Chronic immunoglobulin maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis

Efficacy and safety of maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin in generalized myasthenia gravis patients with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Prospective, randomized, controlled trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are lacking. In this trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of caprylate/chromatography-purified IVIG; (IGIV-C) in patients with generalized MG undergoing standard care.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients enrolled in this phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized trial (1:1 IGIV-C [2 g/kg loading dose; 1 g/kg every 3 weeks through week 21] or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by changes in Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 24 versus baseline (primary endpoint) and percentage of patients with clinical improvement in QMG, MG Composite (MGC), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (secondary endpoints). Safety assessments reported all adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The change in QMG at 24 weeks was -5.1 for IGIV-C and -3.1 for placebo (p = .187). Seventy percent of patients in the IGIV-C group had improvement in MG-ADL (≥2-point decrease) versus 40.6% in the placebo group (p = .025). Patients showing clinical improvement in QMG and MGC (≥3-point decrease) were 70.0% for IGIV-C versus 59.4% for placebo (p = .442) and 60.0% for IGIV-C versus 53.1% for placebo (p = .610). IGIV-C was well tolerated; serious AEs were similar between arms. Three of four MG exacerbations requiring hospitalizations occurred in the IGIV-C arm with one death.

DISCUSSION

Several efficacy parameters showed numerical results greater than those seen in the placebo group. This was a small study and may have been underpowered to see significant differences. Additional studies may be warranted to fully determine the efficacy of IVIG maintenance therapy in MG.

Medical costs of treating myasthenia gravis in patients who need intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) - a register-based study

BACKGROUND

Several innovative treatments are expected for myasthenia gravis (MG) in the coming years. Healthcare payers usually require cost-effectiveness analyses before reimbursement. We aimed to investigate resource utilization and direct medical costs for patients with MG treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to inform such analyses.

METHODS

We identified patients with MG in the Norwegian Patient Registry based on at least two hospital encounters with an MG diagnosis (ICD-10 G70.0) from 1 Jan 2010 to 31 Dec 2021. IVIg treatment was identified by medical procedure and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes (RPGM05 and J06BA02). Using Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) cost weights, we estimated direct medical costs for each year following the first MG diagnosis.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 1083 patients were diagnosed with MG in Norway, of whom 155 (14.3%) were treated with IVIg. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between IVIg and non-IVIg patients. Compared with non-IVIg patients, IVIg-patients had 2.3 times higher direct medical costs during the first year after MG diagnosis (EUR 35,714 vs. EUR 15,457) and 3.1 times higher costs during the second year (EUR 19,119 vs. EUR 6256). In the fifth year after diagnosis, IVIg-patients still had higher costs and resource utilization than non-IVIg patients (EUR 9953 vs. EUR 5634).

CONCLUSION

IVIg treatment represents an important marker for high direct medical costs among patients with MG. The costs continue to be high during the first five years after MG diagnosis.

Patient-reported preferences for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of parenteral drug treatments in adults with immune disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: Several studies have found subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of similar drugs for long-lasting immunological and autoimmune diseases to have similar clinical effectiveness, meaning that what patients report they prefer is, or should be, a major factor in treatment choices. Therefore, it is important to systematically compile evidence regarding patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using SC or IV administration of the same drug. Materials & methods: PubMed database searches were run on 15 October 2021. Studies involving patients with experience of both home-based SC and hospital-based IV administration of immunoglobulins or biological therapies for the treatment of any autoimmune disease or primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) were included. The outcomes assessed were patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and HRQL. Preference data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 3504 citations were screened, and 46 publications describing 37 studies were included in the review. There was a strong overall preference for SC over IV administration, with similar results seen for PIDs and autoimmune diseases: PID, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-94%) preferred SC; autoimmune diseases, 83% (95% CI: 73-92%); overall, 82% (95% CI: 75-89%). The meta-analysis also found that 84% (95% CI: 75-92%) of patients preferred administration at home to treatment in hospital. Analysis of treatment satisfaction using the life quality index found consistently better treatment interference and treatment setting scores with SC administration than with IV administration. Conclusion: Compared with IV infusions in hospital, patients tend to prefer, to be more satisfied with and to report better HRQL with SC administration of the same drug at home, primarily due to the greater convenience. This study contributes to evidence-based care of patients with autoimmune diseases or PIDs.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment

BACKGROUND

Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research.

METHODS

MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings.

RESULTS

Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: From Old Drugs to Innovative Therapies with a Glimpse into the Future

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes debilitating muscle weakness due to impaired neuromuscular transmission. Since most (about 80-90%) MG patients present autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor, standard medical therapy consists of symptomatic treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine). In addition, considering the autoimmune basis of MG, standard therapy includes immunomodulating agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporine A, and cyclophosphamide. New strategies have been proposed for the treatment of MG and include complement blockade (i.e., eculizumab, ravulizumab, and zilucoplan) and neonatal Fc receptor antagonism (i.e., efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab). The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the five pharmacological treatments most recently approved for the treatment of MG, by identifying both preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov. A description of the molecules currently under evaluation for the treatment of MG is also provided.

Myasthenia gravis-Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction resulting in skeletal muscle weakness. It is equally prevalent in males and females, but debuts at a younger age in females and at an older age in males. Ptosis, diplopia, facial bulbar weakness, and limb weakness are the most common symptoms. MG can be classified based on the presence of serum autoantibodies. Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies are found in 80%-85% of patients, muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies in 5%-8%, and <1% may have low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (Lrp4) antibodies. Approximately 10% of patients are seronegative for antibodies binding the known disease-related antigens. In patients with AChR MG, 10%-20% have a thymoma, which is usually detected at the onset of the disease. Important differences between clinical presentation, treatment responsiveness, and disease mechanisms have been observed between these different serologic MG classes. Besides the typical clinical features and serologic testing, the diagnosis can be established with additional tests, including repetitive nerve stimulation, single fiber EMG, and the ice pack test. Treatment options for MG consist of symptomatic treatment (such as pyridostigmine), immunosuppressive treatment, or thymectomy. Despite the treatment with symptomatic drugs, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy, a large proportion of patients remain chronically dependent on corticosteroids (CS). In the past decade, the number of treatment options for MG has considerably increased. Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology have led to new treatment options targeting B or T cells, the complement cascade, the neonatal Fc receptor or cytokines. In the future, these new treatments are likely to reduce the chronic use of CS, diminish side effects, and decrease the number of patients with refractory disease.

Myasthenia gravis: Molecular mechanisms and promising therapeutic strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a type of autoimmune disease caused by the blockage of neuromuscular junction transmission owing to the attack of autoantibodies on transmission-related proteins. Related antibodies, such as anti-AChR, anti-MuSK and anti-LRP4 antibodies, can be detected in most patients with MG. Although traditional therapies can control most symptoms, several challenges remain to be addressed, necessitating the development of more effective and safe treatment strategies for MG. With the in-depth exploration on the mechanism and immune targets of MG, effective therapies, especially therapies using biologicals, have been reported recently. Given the important roles of immune cells, cytokines and intercellular interactions in the pathological process of MG, B-cell targeted therapy, T-cell targeted therapy, proteasome inhibitors targeting plasma cell, complement inhibitors, FcRn inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of MG. Although these novel therapies exert good therapeutic effects, they may weaken the immunity and increase the risk of infection in MG patients. This review elaborates on the pathogenesis of MG and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the strategies of traditional treatment and biologicals. In addition, this review emphasises that combined therapy may have better therapeutic effects and reducing the risk of side effects of treatments, which has great prospects for the treatment of MG. With the deepening of research on immunotherapy targets in MG, novel opportunities and challenges in the treatment of MG will be introduced.

Low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in different immune-mediated conditions

IVIg has been used for a long time as a replacement therapy for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. Beside this supplementary role, when used at higher doses (i.e., 2 g/kg/monthly) it exerts an immunomodulatory role able to control multiple autoimmune and systemic inflammatory diseases. Several mechanisms of action have been described and hypothesized, nonetheless a synergistic action on the different component of the immune response seems to be crucial. The other side of the coin are the costs which showed an increase during the years due to the production of highly purified preparations which limit side reactions. This renders the product not easily accessible especially for low-income countries. Moreover, it is based on plasma donations that experienced a significant shrinkage after the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequences are still impactful. Due to the above-mentioned problems different authors tried to find out if a lower dosage of IVIg (< 2 g/kg/monthly) might exert an immunoregulatory role. In this review we aimed to summarize the current literature about a possible beneficial effect of a lower dosage of IVIg in multiple conditions that would help to treat a vast majority of patients. Even though in some cases (e.g., Kawasaki disease and immune thrombocytopenia) results are promising, for other conditions more research is needed.

Immunoglobulin utilization in Canada: a comparative analysis of provincial guidelines and a scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Canada has high immunoglobulin (IG) product utilization, raising concerns about appropriate utilization, cost and risk of shortages. Currently, there is no national set of standardized IG guidelines, and considerable variations exist among the existing provincial guidelines. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare the existing Canadian provincial guidelines on the use of IG products to identify their consistencies and differences and (2) to examine the existing research in Canada on IG supply and utilization following the establishment of IG guidelines to understand the scope of research and pinpoint the gaps.

METHODS

A comparative analysis accounted for the differences across provincial IG guidelines. We highlighted similarities and differences in recommendations for medical conditions. A scoping review of citations from MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases was conducted for studies published from January 01, 2014, to April 12, 2023.

RESULTS

While provincial guidelines represented a considerable overlap in the medical conditions delineated and relatively uniform dose calculations, numerous differences were observed, including in recommendation categories, provision of pediatric dosing, and divergent recommendations for identical conditions based on patient demographics. The scoping review identified 29 studies that focused on the use of IG in Canada. The themes of the studies included: IVIG utilization and audits, the switch from IVIG to SCIG, patient satisfaction with IVIG and/or SCIG, the economic impact of self-administered SCIG versus clinically administered IVIG therapy, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of alternative medications to IG treatment.

CONCLUSION

The differences in guidelines across provinces and the factors influencing IVIG/SCIG use, patient satisfaction, and cost savings are highlighted. Future research may focus on clarifying costs and comparative effectiveness, exploring factors influencing guideline adherence, and evaluating the impact of updated guidelines on IG use and patient outcomes.

FcRN receptor antagonists in the management of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibodies specifically directed against proteins located within the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. These pathogenic autoantibodies can be reduced by therapies such as plasma exchange, IVIG infusions and other immunosuppressive agents. However, there are significant side effects associated with most of these therapies. Since there is a better understanding of the molecular structure and the biological properties of the neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn), it possesses an attractive profile in treating myasthenia gravis. FcRn receptors prevent the catabolism of IgG by impeding their lysosomal degradation and facilitating their extracellular release at physiological pH, consequently extending the IgG half-life. Thus, the catabolism of IgG can be enhanced by blocking the FcRn, leading to outcomes similar to those achieved through plasma exchange with no significant safety concerns. The available studies suggest that FcRn holds promise as a versatile therapeutic intervention, capable of delivering beneficial outcomes in patients with distinct characteristics and varying degrees of MG severity. Efgartigimod is already approved for the treatment of generalized MG, rozanolixizumab is under review by health authorities, and phase 3 trials of nipocalimab and batoclimab are underway. Here, we will review the available data on FcRn therapeutic agents in the management of MG.

Practise of Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Primary and Secondary Immunodeficiencies: A Single Centre Experience from Malaysia

Background

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement therapy is increasingly in demand. This study focused on the characteristics of IVIG usage and associated factors toward the frequency status of IVIG among patients in Hospital Kuala Lumpur.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on patients who received IVIG in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Data were extracted from the request forms for IVIG recorded in the Pharmacy Department from January 2018 until December 2019. Chi-squared test and t-test analysis were used for statistical analysis, and a P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 482 patients received IVIG in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. There were 243 (50.4%) females and 228 (47.3%) males with median age of the patients was 27 years old. The highest indications for IVIG among all patients were hypogammaglobulinemia and other deficiency states in 127 patients (26.3%). The most common indication for one-off treatment in adults was hypogammaglobulinemia and other deficiency states, 35%; whereas in paediatrics, it was Kawasaki disease, 20.3%. The highest indication for regular therapy among adult patients was chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (23.4%), while in paediatrics it was sepsis (31.1%). The clinical category was associated with the frequency status of IVIG usage in both adult and paediatric cohorts with P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively.

Conclusion

There were significant differences between the indication of one-off treatment and regular therapy among adult and paediatric patients. A national guideline on the prescription of IVIG for patients is instantly needed to help clinicians in prescribing IVIG appropriately.

Treatment patterns in myasthenia gravis: A United States health claims analysis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Limited knowledge exists on treatment patterns in clinical practice in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). In this study we examined MG treatment patterns in the United States.

METHODS

Adult patients newly diagnosed with MG were identified from the IBM MarketScan insurance claims database. Patients with ≥2 MG International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes ≥3 months apart were retrospectively followed from the date of their first MG diagnosis record or start of treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI), intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulin (Ig), or plasma exchange (PLEx) therapy. Based on treatment received at any time during the follow-up period, patients were segmented into six main treatment cohorts. Exacerbations and use of IVIg, SCIg, or PLEx after the index date were identified.

RESULTS

During 2010 to 2019, 7,194 patients were followed for up to 10 (median, 2.3) years. Of 6,539 treated patients, 6,462 (99%) were ever treated with AChEI and/or corticosteroids (CS); 95% were first treated with AChEI and/or CS only; 33% received ≥1 nonsteroid immunosuppressive treatment (IST) and 2% received a biologic. During treatment with first IST (n = 2,166), patients experienced 42% and 94% higher incidence rates of exacerbations and IVIg, respectively, compared with AChEI and/or CS (n = 6,242), and 33% and 23% higher, respectively, compared with a second IST (n = 353).

DISCUSSION

Many patients experienced exacerbations and received rescue therapy despite treatment, suggesting current treatments may not provide adequate disease control for some patients and that additional treatment options should be explored.

Short-term outcome prediction for myasthenia gravis: an explainable machine learning model

Background

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. The fluctuating nature of the disease course impedes the clinical management.

Objective

The purpose of the study was to establish and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the short-term clinical outcome in MG patients with different antibody types.

Methods

We studied 890 MG patients who had regular follow-ups at 11 tertiary centers in China from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2021 (653 patients for derivation and 237 for validation). The short-term outcome was the modified post-intervention status (PIS) at a 6-month visit. A two-step variable screening was used to determine the factors for model construction and 14 ML algorithms were used for model optimisation.

Results

The derivation cohort included 653 patients from Huashan hospital [age 44.24 (17.22) years, female 57.6%, generalized MG 73.5%], and the validation cohort included 237 patients from 10 independent centers [age 44.24 (17.22) years, female 55.0%, generalized MG 81.2%]. The ML model identified patients who were improved with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 [0.89-0.93], 'Unchanged' 0.89 [0.87-0.91], and 'Worse' 0.89 [0.85-0.92] in the derivation cohort, whereas identified patients who were improved with an AUC of 0.84 [0.79-0.89], 'Unchanged' 0.74 [0.67-0.82], and 'Worse' 0.79 [0.70-0.88] in the validation cohort. Both datasets presented a good calibration ability by fitting the expectation slopes. The model is finally explained by 25 simple predictors and transferred to a feasible web tool for an initial assessment.

Conclusion

The explainable, ML-based predictive model can aid in forecasting the short-term outcome for MG with good accuracy in clinical practice.

Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Corticosteroid-Sparing Effects of Immunoglobulin in Myasthenia Gravis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction at the neuromuscular junction. Treatment frequently includes corticosteroids (CSs) and IV immunoglobulin (IVIG). This study was conducted to determine whether immune globulin (human), 10% caprylate/chromatography purified (IGIV-C) could facilitate CS dose reduction in CS-dependent patients with MG.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, CS-dependent patients with MG (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Class II-Iva; AChR+) received a loading dose of 2 g/kg IGIV-C over 2 days (maximum 80 g/d) or placebo at week 0 (baseline). Maintenance doses (1 g/kg IGIV-C or placebo) were administered every 3 weeks through week 36. Tapering of CS was initiated at week 9 and continued through week 36 unless the patient worsened (quantitative MG score ≥4 points from baseline). CS doses were increased (based on the current CS dose) in patients who worsened. Patients were withdrawn if worsening failed to improve within 6 weeks or if a second CS increase was required. The primary efficacy end point (at week 39) was a ≥50% reduction in CS dose. Secondary and safety end points were assessed throughout the study and follow-up (weeks 42 and 45). The study results and full protocol are available at clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02473965.

RESULTS

The primary end point (≥50% reduction in CS dose) showed no significant difference between the IGIV-C treatment (60.0% of patients) and placebo (63.3%). There were no significant differences for secondary end points. Safety data indicated that IGIV-C was well tolerated.

DISCUSSION

In this study, IGIV-C was not more effective than placebo in reducing daily CS dose. These results suggest that the effects of IGIV-C and CS are not synergistic and may be mechanistically different.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

The trial was registered on clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EudraCT #: 2013-005099-17) and clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02473965).

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that IVIG infusions in adult patients with MG do not increase the percentage of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in corticosteroid dose compared with placebo.

Healthcare resource use in myasthenia gravis: a US health claims analysis

Background

There are limited data on the impact of myasthenia gravis (MG) on real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) and patient burden in the United States.

Objectives

This study aims to assess HCRU in patients with MG using data from a US health claims database.

Design

A retrospective, database study of adult patients newly diagnosed with MG, using the IBM^® MarketScan^® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare supplemental health insurance claims database.

Methods

Patients with ⩾2 MG International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes ⩾3 months apart were followed from the date of their first MG diagnosis record or start of treatment. HCRU and use of immunoglobulins and plasma exchange during follow-up was assessed, as well as comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and specialist visits per year after diagnosis, and compared with age- and sex-matched non-MG controls.

Results

During 2010-2019, 7194 patients were followed for up to 10 years (median = 2.3 years). During follow-up, patients with MG were 2.6-fold more likely than controls to be hospitalized, and 4.5-fold more likely to be admitted to an ICU. Risk and numbers of ER admission, hospitalization, and ICU visits were the highest in the 12 months post-diagnosis of MG and were consistently higher than controls during follow-up. MG was the main cause for most hospitalizations.

Conclusion

Patients with MG have higher HCRU, compared with the age- and sex-matched non-MG controls. The early years after MG diagnosis are a period of particularly high healthcare burden, with many patients requiring hospitalization and ICU care to manage serious exacerbations.

Myasthenia gravis and congenital myasthenic syndromes

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies against elements in the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction, which leads to muscle weakness. Congenital myasthenic syndromes are rare and caused by mutations affecting pre- or postsynaptic function at the neuromuscular synapse and resulting in muscle weakness. MG has a prevalence of 150-250 and an annual incidence of 8-10 individuals per million. The majority has disease onset after age 50 years. Juvenile MG with onset in early childhood is more common in East Asia. MG is subgrouped according to type of pathogenic autoantibodies, age of onset, thymus pathology, and generalization of muscle weakness. More than 80% have antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor. The remaining have antibodies against MuSK, LRP4, or postsynaptic membrane antigens not yet identified. A thymoma is present in 10% of MG patients, and more than one-third of thymoma patients develop MG as a paraneoplastic condition. Immunosuppressive drug therapy, thymectomy, and symptomatic drug therapy with acetylcholine esterase inhibitors represent cornerstones in the treatment. The prognosis is good, with the majority of patients having mild or moderate symptoms only. Most congenital myasthenic syndromes are due to dysfunction in the postsynaptic membrane. Symptom debut is in early life. Symptomatic drug treatment has sometimes a positive effect.

Real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) among patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) over 3 years post-IVIg initiation.

METHODS

Patients with gMG who initiated IVIg treatment were identified from a United States claims database (Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse [IDV]®, January 1, 2014 - December 31, 2019). The frequency of subsequent IVIg treatment and associated cost during the year post-IVIg initiation were analyzed. Usage patterns of IVIg and concomitant gMG treatments during the year preceding and 3 years post-IVIg initiation were compared.

RESULTS

Among 1225 patients with gMG who initiated IVIg treatment, 706 patients (57.6%) received 1 to 5 IVIg treatment courses (intermittent IVIg users), and 519 patients (42.4%) received ≥6 IVIg treatment courses (chronic IVIg users) within the subsequent year. Mean annual medical cost per patient was nearly 2.5-fold higher for chronic vs. intermittent IVIg users ($161,478 vs. $64,888, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients using corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive treatments (NSISTs) was not reduced over the 3-year follow-up period following IVIg initiation, even for patients who continued annual chronic IVIg for 3 consecutive years post-initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients with gMG received chronic and multiple IVIg treatment courses within the first year once initiating IVIg treatment, indicating higher usage than expected. For all IVIg initiators, the proportion of patients using corticosteroids and NSISTs did not decrease over 3 years despite IVIg initiation.

One-year follow-up of disease burden and medication changes in patients with myasthenia gravis: From the MG Patient Registry

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

We studied the progression of myasthenia gravis (MG) disease burden and medication adjustment among MG Patient Registry participants.

METHODS

Participants diagnosed with MG (age ≥18 years), registered between July 1, 2013 and July 31, 2018 and completing both 6- and 12-month follow-up surveys, were included in this investigation. Participants were grouped into high-burden (Myasthenia Gravis Activity of Daily Living scale [MG-ADL] score ≥6) and low-burden (MG-ADL <6) groups based on MG-ADL scores at enrollment. Demographics and disease history were compared between groups. MG-ADL score change and medication changes (escalation, no change, de-escalation) between enrollment and 12-month follow-up were compared between groups. Minimal symptom expression (MSE, MG-ADL <2) at 12 months was compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to study factors associated with MSE at 12 months.

RESULTS

In total, 520 participants (56% female) were included in high-burden (n = 248) and low-burden (n = 272) groups. Those in the high-burden group were more likely to be younger, female, and have shorter disease duration. At 12 months, MSE was achieved in 6% of the high-burden group and newly achieved (42 of 201, 21%) or maintained (52 of 71, 73%) in the low-burden group. In the multivariable analysis, being in the high-burden group and use of pyridostigmine were associated with less likelihood of MSE, whereas MG-ADL score improvement (>2 or >20%) at 6 months significantly increased the likelihood of achieving MSE at 12 months (P = .0004).

DISCUSSION

In both groups, but more so in the high-burden group, patients infrequently achieved MSE after 1 year of MG treatment. Baseline low disease burden, improvement at 6 months and no pyridostigmine use were associated with a higher likelihood of MSE at 12 months.

Usefulness of subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in the management of myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

To describe the efficacy of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in the neuromuscular referral center of Bordeaux (between January 1, 2014 and March 31, 2021) with MG patients treated with SCIg. The main outcome was SCIg efficacy assessed by the before and after SCIg Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification, the duration of hospitalization and the number of days of orotracheal intubation (OTI).

Results

Sixteen patients were included in the study (11 females; 5 males). Nine patients were still treated with SCIg at the end of the study (March 31, 2021) and then underwent prospective follow-up. The average age of the patients was 56.1 (19–83) years. The median duration of MG at onset of SCIg was 37.4 months. Eight patients (50%) remained stable (4 in stage MGFA-IV and 4 in MGFA-III). Eight patients (50%) improved: 3 from MGFA-IV to MGFA-III, 1 from MGFA-IV to MGFA-II, 1 from MGFA-IV to MGFA-I, 2 from MGFA-III to MGFA-II and 1 from MGFA-III to MGFA-I (no patient worsened). The duration of disease progression did not appear to affect the response to SCIg therapy. The number of hospital days per month was significantly reduced after SCIg compared to before, and the number of days in intensive care unit and the number of days of OTI were also reduced. Only minor adverse effects were noted, and 80% of patients were in favor of continuing SCIg.

Conclusions

SCIg is a well-tolerated and useful treatment in MG, offering interesting perspectives in the management of MG patients. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

An update on the use of immunoglobulins as treatment for myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody mediated disease where pathogenic antibodies interact with the acetylcholine receptor or other proteins at the post-synaptic neuromuscular junction. There is growing evidence that immunoglobulin infusions are beneficial for clinical exacerbations and chronic refractory disease and may be an option for patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies.

AREAS COVERED

We performed an extensive literature review, looking for evidence on the use of immunoglobulins for the treatment of MG, by conducting a search in MEDLINE (1946 to present), EMBASE (1947 to present) and Clinicaltrials.gov. We have included studies on the use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIG) for acute deterioration and chronic disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of IVIG in MG provides an option for rapid improvement in critical deterioration, being preferred over more invasive and less available therapies such as plasmapheresis. For refractory MG, the addition of IVIG can improve a patient's status and reduce the dosage of immunosuppressive medications. The alternative of SCIG is also effective and has advantages of infusion time flexibility, fewer side-effects, and patient independence. The safety and efficacy of both interventions, patient preferences and quality of life may direct therapeutic choices in the future.

Pharmacotherapy of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis with Special Emphasis on Newer Biologicals

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic, fluctuating, antibody-mediated autoimmune disorder directed against the post-synaptic neuromuscular junctions of skeletal muscles, resulting in a wide spectrum of manifestations ranging from mild to potentially fatal. Given its unique natural course, designing an ideal trial design for MG has been wrought with difficulties and evidence in favour of several of the conventional agents is weak as per current standards. Despite this, acetylcholinesterases and corticosteroids have remained the cornerstones of treatment for several decades with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) offering rapid treatment response, especially in crises. However, the treatment of MG entails long-term immunosuppression and conventional agents are viable options but take longer to act and have a number of class-specific adverse effects. Advances in immunology, translational medicine and drug development have seen the emergence of several newer biological agents which offer selective, target-specific immunotherapy with fewer side effects and rapid onset of action. Eculizumab is one of the newer agents that belong to the class of complement inhibitors and has been approved for the treatment of refractory general MG. Zilucoplan and ravulizumab are other agents in this group in clinical trials. Neisseria meningitis is a concern with all complement inhibitors, mandating vaccination. Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors prevent immunoglobulin recycling and cause rapid reduction in antibody levels. Efgartigimod is an FcRn inhibitor recently approved for MG treatment, and rozanolixizumab, nipocalimab and batoclimab are other agents in clinical trial development. Although lacking high quality evidence from randomized clinical trials, clinical experience with the use of anti-CD20 rituximab has led to its use in refractory MG. Among novel targets, interleukin 6 (IL6) inhibitors such as satralizumab are promising and currently undergoing evaluation. Cutting-edge therapies include genetically modifying T cells to recognise chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) and chimeric autoantibody receptors (CAAR). These may offer sustained and long-term remissions, but are still in very early stages of evaluation. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) allows immune resetting and offers sustained remission, but the induction regimens often involve serious systemic toxicity. While MG treatment is moving beyond conventional agents towards target-specific biologicals, lack of knowledge as to the initiation, maintenance, switching, tapering and long-term safety profile necessitates further research. These concerns and the high financial burden of novel agents may hamper widespread clinical use in the near future.

Advances and challenges in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease with fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Standard immunomodulatory treatment may fail to achieve sufficient improvement with minimal symptom expression or remission of myasthenic symptoms, despite adequate dosing and duration of treatment. Treatment-resistant MG poses a challenge for both patients and treating neurologists and requires new therapeutic approaches. The spectrum of upcoming immunotherapies that more specifically address distinct targets of the main immunological players in MG pathogenesis includes T-cell directed monoclonal antibodies that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation, monoclonal antibodies directed against key B-cell molecules, as well as monoclonal antibodies against the fragment crystallizable neonatal receptor (FcRn), cytokines and transmigration molecules, and also drugs that inhibit distinct elements of the complement system activated by the pathogenic MG antibodies. The review gives an overview on new drugs being evaluated in still ongoing or recently finished controlled clinical trials and drugs of potential benefit in MG due to their mechanisms of action and positive effects in other autoimmune disorders. Also, the challenges associated with the new therapeutic options are discussed briefly.

Treatment of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease with subcutaneous immune globulin

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody associated disease (MOGAD) is a distinct demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that often exhibits a relapsing course. Immune globulin (Ig) therapy has been proposed as maintenance therapy to prevent relapses in MOGAD, but existing reports are limited to the use of intravenous Ig (IVIG). Subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) may exhibit several advantages over IVIG, including self-administration and less systemic adverse effects. Herein, we report six patients with MOGAD who were treated with subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) with good tolerability and without any relapses during follow-up. This supports the rationale for prospective randomized studies of SCIG in MOGAD.

Current and Upcoming Treatment Modalities in Myasthenia Gravis

ABSTRACT

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is one of the extensively studied autoimmune disorder. There has been a dramatic increase in research to further understand molecular pathogenesis of MG and clinical trials for new drugs in MG treatment in the past decade. This review article is to consolidate the available information in simple terms with students, residents, and fellows as target audience for easy learning and help application of this knowledge to clinical practice.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Introduction: Advances in understanding the immune pathomechanisms in myasthenia gravis (MG) allow for the development of novel targeted immune therapies. By working at specific points in the immunopathogenesis, these agents have the potential to provide rapid and efficacious responses compared to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (IST), addressing unmet needs and consequently are a research priority.Areas covered: This paper reviews the advances in MG treatment modalities with their scientific rationale. A search of clinicaltrials.gov and a literature search of PubMed from January 2015 to the end of June 2021 was done using the search terms: MG, treatment, immune targets to obtain information on recent developments of complement inhibitors, FcRn receptor inhibitors, direct and indirect B cell inhibitors, CAR and CAAR- T cell therapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Specific agents in various phases of clinical development, evidence from ongoing trials and potential roadblocks are examined.Expert opinion: Despite several promising novel agents, existing data as to the timing of initiation and duration of treatment, long-term safety profile and utility in certain patient subsets are limited and require further research. Despite these considerations, the future of MG treatment is transitioning from broad-spectrum IST toward precise, target-driven and personalized immunotherapy.

Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proven beneficial in myasthenic crisis, but their role as maintenance therapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if maintenance therapy with low-dose IVIg improves clinical outcome and may be used as a steroid-sparing agent in myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of all MG patients treated with IVIg from January 2006 to December 2019. Long-term treatment response to IVIg was assessed by improvement in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification scale as primary end point, as well as the ability to reduce the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone as secondary end-point, in a follow-up period of 36 months.

RESULTS

109 patients were treated with IVIg. The mean follow-up time was 34.03 ± 5.5 months. Sixty-seven patients (61.4%) responded to therapy with at least one-point improvement of the MGFA scale. There was no statistical difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between IVIg responders and non-responders. The mean prednisone dose decreased significantly from 33.1 ± 14.5 mg at baseline to 7.2 ± 7.8 mg after 36 months of IVIg treatment (P < 0.0001), with the greatest effect after 6 months (33.1 ± 14.5 mg Vs. 17.9 ± 11.7 mg; P < 0.0001). In the follow-up period of 36 months, most patients (92.5%) remained clinically and pharmacologically stable under chronic IVIg treatment.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study demonstrates that chronic low-dose IVIg treatment in patients with MG improves clinical outcomes and has a prolonged and significant steroid-sparing effect over a period of 3 years.

Practical Aspects of Transitioning from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Neuromuscular Disorders

Recent evidence shows that subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is as efficacious as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and has a better safety profile and acceptance rate among patients with neuromuscular disorders who require maintenance IVIG treatment. Awareness of the practical aspects of patient selection, enrollment, dose calculation, administration, and follow-up would help physicians coordinate a smooth and seamless transition from IVIG to SCIG. SCIG is ideally offered to patients having intolerable side effects during IVIG or wearing-off effect and in those keen for treatment autonomy. The weekly dose of SCIG is calculated by multiplying the maintenance dose of IVIG by the dose adjustment factor and dividing by the interval between IVIG in weeks and is initiated 1 week after the last dose of IVIG. The physician places the order for the SCIG and the clinic nurse or the physician refers the patient to the home care nursing program for further education and training. The necessary supplies are dispatched to the patient who would also collect the SCIG from the transfusion center of the nearest hospital. The patient is educated on assembling and administering the infusion, and home visits are continued until the patient or caregiver is confident. Regular follow-up with the patient is maintained to assess treatment response and side effects if any. With a smooth transition, most patients have excellent tolerance to SCIG and in our experience seldom request switching back to IVIG. Transitioning patients from IVIG to SCIG offers several advantages and thus, in general, is preferable for multiple stakeholders.