A diagnostic score for anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein neuropathy or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein antibody

Anti-MAG neuropathy: historical aspects, clinical-pathological correlations, and considerations for future therapeutical trials

BACKGROUND

 Patients with anti-MAG neuropathy present with distal demyelinating polyneuropathy, IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and elevated titers of anti-MAG antibodies.

OBJECTIVE

 This paper reviews what is known about the clinical presentation, course, pathophysiology, and treatment of anti-MAG neuropathy, with considerations for the design of therapeutic trials.

METHODS

 A literature review of the medical and scientific literature related to anti-MAG neuropathy, and the design of therapeutic clinical trials in peripheral neuropathy.

RESULTS

 Anti-MAG neuropathy can remain indolent for many years but then enter a progressive phase. Highly elevated antibody titers are diagnostic, but intermediate titers can also occur in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The peripheral nerves can become inexcitable, thereby masking the demyelinating abnormalities. There is good evidence that the anti-MAG antibodies cause neuropathy. Reduction of the autoantibody concentration by agents that target B-cells was reported to result in clinical improvement in case series and uncontrolled trials, but not in controlled clinical trials, probably due to inadequate trial design.

CONCLUSION

 We propose that therapeutic trials for anti-MAG neuropathy include patients with the typical presentation, some degree of weakness, highly elevated anti-MAG antibody titers, and at least one nerve exhibiting demyelinating range abnormalities. Treatment with one or a combination of anti-B-cell agents would aim at reducing the autoantibody concentration by at least 60%. A trial duration of 2 years may be required to show efficacy. The neuropathy impairment score of the lower extremities (NIS-LL) plus the Lower Limb Function (LLF) score would be a suitable primary outcome measure.

Therapeutic Outcomes and Electrophysiological Biomarkers in Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: A Multicenter Cohort Study in South Korea

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Unlike other immune-mediated neuropathies, anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is often refractory to immunotherapy. It is necessary to compare the relative efficacies of various immunotherapies and develop objective biomarkers in order to optimize its clinical management.

METHODS

This study recruited 91 patients with high anti-MAG antibody titers from 7 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. We analyzed the baseline characteristics, therapeutic outcomes, and nerve conduction study (NCS) findings of 68 patients and excluded 23 false positive cases.

RESULTS

The rate of positive responses to treatment was highest using zanubrutinib (50%) and rituximab (36.4%), followed by corticosteroids (16.7%), immunosuppressants (9.5%), intravenous immunoglobulin (5%), and plasma exchange (0%). Disability and weakness were significantly associated with multiple NCS parameters at the time of diagnosis, especially distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes. Moreover, the longitudinal trajectory of the average CMAP amplitudes paralleled the clinical courses, with a 16.2 percentile decrease as an optimal cutoff for predicting a clinical exacerbation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.792).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the use of NCS as an objective marker for estimating disease burden and tracking clinical changes in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. We have described the beneficial effects of rituximab and a new drug, zanubrutinib, compared with conventional immunotherapies.

Mutational Profile in 75 Patients With Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Clinical and Hematologic Therapy Response and Hints on New Therapeutic Targets

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neuropathy with antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) is the most common paraproteinemic IgM neuropathy. Recently, the mutational profile of the MYD88 and CXCR4 genes has been included in the diagnostic workup of IgM monoclonal gammopathies. The objective of our study was to assess the prevalence of MYD88 ^L265P and CXCR4 ^S338X gene variants in patients with anti-MAG antibody neuropathy. Secondary aims were to evaluate possible correlations between the mutational profile and neuropathy severity, antibody titers, and treatment response.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients (47 men, mean age at molecular analysis 70.8 ± 10.2 years; mean disease duration 5.1 ± 4.9 years) with anti-MAG antibody neuropathy were recruited. Among them, 38 (50.7%) had IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, 29 (38.7%) Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM), and 8 (10.6%) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/marginal zone lymphoma/hairy cell leukemia variant. Molecular analysis was performed on DNA from the bone marrow mononuclear cells in 55 of 75 patients and from peripheral mononuclear cells in 18 of 75 patients. Forty-five patients were treated with rituximab, 6 with ibrutinib, 2 with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil, and 3 with venetoclax-based therapy. All the patients were assessed with the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Scale, INCAT Sensory Sum Score, and MRC Sum Score at baseline and follow-up. We considered as responders, patients who improved by at least 1 point in 2 clinical scales.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (66.7%) carried the MYD88^L265P variant, with a higher frequency in WM and naive patients (77.2% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0012). No patients harbored the CXCR4^S338X variant. There were no significant differences in hematologic data (IgM levels, M protein, and anti-MAG antibody titers), neuropathy severity, or response to rituximab in MYD88-altered and MYD88 wild-type patients. Nine of 11 (81.8%) patients treated with novel targeted drug, according to the MYD88 status, responded to treatments.

DISCUSSION

MYD88^L265P variant has a high prevalence (66.7%) in anti-MAG antibody neuropathy representing a potential effective mutational target for Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. MYD88^L265P variant, however, does not seem to be a prognostic factor of neuropathy severity or response to rituximab. In patients not responding or becoming refractory to rituximab, a tailored therapy with new effective target therapies should be considered.

Value of Antibody Determinations in Chronic Dysimmune Neuropathies

Chronic dysimmune neuropathies encompass a group of neuropathies that share immune-mediated pathomechanism. Chronic dysimmune antibody-related neuropathies include anti-MAG neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and neuropathies related to immune attack against paranodal antigens. Such neuropathies exhibit distinguishing pathomechanism, clinical and response to therapy features with respect to chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and its variants, which represent the most frequent form of chronic dysimmune neuropathy. This narrative review provides an overview of pathomechanism; clinical, electrophysiological, and biochemical features; and treatment response of the antibody-mediated neuropathies, aiming to establish when and why to look for antibodies in chronic dysimmune neuropathies.

Tips in navigating the diagnostic complexities of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The 2021 guideline of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) includes important revisions to the previous 2010 guideline. This article highlights the new criteria and recommendations for the differential diagnosis of CIDP. In the revised guideline, the CIDP spectrum has been modified to include typical CIDP and four well-characterized CIDP variants, namely distal, multifocal/focal, motor and sensory CIDP, replacing the term 'atypical' CIDP. To improve the diagnosis of CIDP, the revised guideline attempts to improve the specificity of the diagnostic criteria for typical CIDP and the four CIDP variants. Specific clinical and electrodiagnostic (including both motor and sensory conduction) criteria are provided for typical CIDP and each of the CIDP variants. The levels of diagnostic certainty have been changed to CIDP and possible CIDP, with the removal of probable CIDP (due to the lack of difference in the accuracy of the electrodiagnostic criteria for probable CIDP) and definite CIDP (due to the lack of a gold standard for diagnosis). If the clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria allow only for a diagnosis of possible CIDP, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound, nerve magnetic resonance imaging, objective treatment response, and nerve biopsy can be used as supportive criteria to upgrade the diagnosis to CIDP. Although the revised guideline needs to be validated and its strengths and weaknesses assessed, using the guideline will likely improve the accuracy of diagnosis of CIDP and variants of CIDP, and aid in distinguishing CIDP from conditions with similar features.