European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and European Academy of Neurology consensus on vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: Improving immunization strategies in the era of highly active immunotherapeutic drugs

Risk of MS relapse and deterioration after COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Upper respiratory viral infections have long been considered triggers for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and exacerbation. The possible effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on MS relapse and deterioration remain controversial.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to find relevant studies assessing changes in relapse rates or Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) following COVID-19 in people with MS. Meta-analyses were performed, and to investigate sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that COVID-19 was not associated with a rise in relapse rate (risk ratio (RR): 0.97, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.67, 1.41, p-value: 0.87) or a rise in EDSS (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.09, 95 % CI: -0.22, 0.03, p-value: 0.13). The analysis of EDSS changes indicated a significant heterogeneity (I2: 55 %, p-value: 0.01). Other analyses were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 infection was not associated with an increased risk of relapse and clinical deterioration in people with MS.

Immunogenicity and safety of vaccines in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Seroconversion rate of vaccines varies and requires further elucidation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) under treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We aimed to investigate this in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE(PubMed) and Cochrane databases were searched based on a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020202018). Studies reporting on patients with MS, diagnosed with McDonald criteria getting vaccinated with any type of vaccine were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of patients being seropositive and experience adverse events after vaccination. Outcomes were expressed as proportions with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Two reviewers independently screened and reviewed existing literature and assessed study quality with the Methodological index for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Of 295 articles, 45 studies were analyzed. Seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccines was 76% (95% CI, 70-80; I2 = 95%; 20 studies including 5601 patients. Protection was lower in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators compared to untreated patients or treatment with other DMTs. Relapse occurred in 2% (95% CI, 1-3; I2 = 86%; 16 studies including 7235 patients). Seroconversion after seasonal influenza vaccines was 82% (95% CI, 65-91; I2 = 90%; 6 studies including 490 patients). Relapse rate was similar to this after COVID-19 vaccination.

CONCLUSION

The majority of MS patients vaccinated for COVID-19 or seasonal influenza mount an adequate immune response without safety concerns. Data on other vaccines are limited.

A single-dose strategy for immunization with live attenuated vaccines is an effective option before treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Mumps-Measles-Rubella (MMR) and Varicella zoster vaccines (VAR) are live attenuated vaccines, usually administered in a two-dose scheme at least 4 weeks apart. However, single-dose immunization schemes may also be effective and can reduce delays in immunosuppressive treatment initiation in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) who need to be immunized.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the immunogenicity of a single-dose attempt (SDA) versus the standard immunization scheme (SIS) with VAR and/or MMR in pwMS.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study in pwMS vaccinated against VAR and/or MMR. We compared seroprotection rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) between the two strategies.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were included. Thirty-one patients received VAR and 67 MMR. In the SDA group, the seroprotection rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.3-78.3) versus 97.2% (95% CI: 85.5-99.9) in the SIS (p < 0.001). For the seroprotected patients, GMTs were similar for both schemes.

CONCLUSION

An SDA of VAR and/or MMR vaccines could be sufficient to protect almost two-thirds of patients. Testing immunogenicity after a single dose of VZ and/or MMR could be included in routine clinical practice to achieve rapid immunization.