Incorporation of dimethyl sulfoxide into experimental hydrophilic and hydrophobic adhesive resins: evaluation of cytotoxic activities

Effects of different surface treatments on surface topography and bond strength in the repair of fiber-reinforced dentin composite

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength between a fiber-reinforced dentin composite and a posterior composite.

METHODS

Forty fiber-reinforced dentin composite resin blocks (4 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm) were separated into eight groups (n = 5) according to the surface preparation methods: (G1) negative control group, (G2) adhesive application, (G3) 50% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) application, (G4) 50% DMSO + adhesive application, (G5) 37% phosphoric acid etch + adhesive application, (G6) air abrasion + adhesive application, (G7) 37% phosphoric acid etch + 50% DMSO application + adhesive application, and (G8) air abrasion +50% DMSO application + adhesive application group. The composite surfaces were repaired in two layers with a posterior composite. Composite sticks were subjected to a micro tensile bond strength (μTBS) test. Fractured surfaces were evaluated using a stereomicroscope (×25). Short fiber-reinforced composite samples' surfaces were investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Shapiro Wilk, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

The highest average (μTBS) values were observed in G8, whereas the lowest mean μTBS values were evident in the G1 group. Statistically significant μTBS values were found in all adhesive-applied groups when compared with the negative control group. Notably, the application of 50% DMSO without adhesive did not lead to a statistically significant increase in μTBS values. SEM images demonstrated that acid etching partially eliminated residues on the composite surface, while air abrasion had a detrimental effect on the integrity of fiber structures.

CONCLUSION

In the repair of fiber-reinforced dentin composite with a posterior composite, adhesive application is an effective approach. The treatment of 50% DMSO without adhesive did not confer a statistically significant advantage, and the supplemental use of acid etch or air abrasion did not show an additional benefit compared to adhesive-only repairs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Adhesive application emerges as a potent and effective strategy for the repair of bur-roughened fiber-reinforced dentin composites. With its limitations, the study highlights the efficacy of adhesive-only repairs without the necessity for additional surface treatments.

A critical review of the material properties guiding the clinician's choice of root canal sealers

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of hydraulic cement sealers has increased the popularity of single cone obturation where the chemistry and properties of hydraulic cement sealers are crucial. This article has investigated the materials present on the market by reviewing the chemistry aiming at understanding whether these materials are optimized or have been tested appropriately.

METHODOLOGY

A market search on materials called bioceramic and hydraulic sealers was undertaken. The safety data sheet and manufacturer details for every material were searched and the components were checked. The literature was searched for information about the properties of these materials based on their composition.

RESULTS

The safety data sheets and manufacturer details were imprecise with some manufacturers providing little detail on composition. From the publications reviewed, it is apparent that the materials used clinically are not optimized, and there is little evidence that the material chemistry and presentation aid the clinical technique in any way.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a rapid increase in materials identifying as bioceramics on the market. These materials have diverse chemistries, and some of the constituents are not declared. This may affect the clinical performance of these materials.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Smart materials developed on the clinical need which are appropriately tested are necessary for a paradigm shift in root canal obturation. It is important to use reputable materials that have been adequately researched in clinical practice.

Solvation role of dimethyl sulfoxide on the interaction with dentin bonding systems after 30 months

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether DMSO could serve as an effective pretreatment to improve the mechanical properties and minimize the degradation of the adhesive interface, through the degree of conversion (DC) and bond strength to dentin of different categories of dentin bonding systems (DBSs) after 30 months.

METHODS

DMSO (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 vol%) were incorporated into four categories of DBSs: Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (MP), Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and Adper Scotchbond Universal (SU). DC was evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). For microtensile bond strength test (µTBS), 1 % DMSO were applied on dentin as pretreatment before DBSs. For SU, both strategies were tested. Specimens for µTBS were tested after 24 h, 6 and 30 months. DC and µTBS data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α < 0.05).

RESULTS

Incorporating 5 %/10 % DMSO increased the DC of CSE. Controversially, when combined with SU, 2 % and 10 % DMSO jeopardized the DC. Regarding µTBS, 1 % DMSO pre-treatment increased the bond strength for MP, SB, SU-ER and SU-SE. After 30 months, MP, SU-ER and SU-SE showed a decrease compared to baseline but remained higher than the control.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

DMSO pretreatment may be a useful strategy to improve the bond interface over time. Its incorporation seems to favor the non-solvated systems regarding DC while it seems to show long-term benefits for bond strength using 1 % DMSO for MP and SU systems.