Solvation role of dimethyl sulfoxide on the interaction with dentin bonding systems after 30 months

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether DMSO could serve as an effective pretreatment to improve the mechanical properties and minimize the degradation of the adhesive interface, through the degree of conversion (DC) and bond strength to dentin of different categories of dentin bonding systems (DBSs) after 30 months.

METHODS

DMSO (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 vol%) were incorporated into four categories of DBSs: Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (MP), Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and Adper Scotchbond Universal (SU). DC was evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). For microtensile bond strength test (µTBS), 1 % DMSO were applied on dentin as pretreatment before DBSs. For SU, both strategies were tested. Specimens for µTBS were tested after 24 h, 6 and 30 months. DC and µTBS data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α < 0.05).

RESULTS

Incorporating 5 %/10 % DMSO increased the DC of CSE. Controversially, when combined with SU, 2 % and 10 % DMSO jeopardized the DC. Regarding µTBS, 1 % DMSO pre-treatment increased the bond strength for MP, SB, SU-ER and SU-SE. After 30 months, MP, SU-ER and SU-SE showed a decrease compared to baseline but remained higher than the control.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

DMSO pretreatment may be a useful strategy to improve the bond interface over time. Its incorporation seems to favor the non-solvated systems regarding DC while it seems to show long-term benefits for bond strength using 1 % DMSO for MP and SU systems.

In vitro performance of 2-step, total etch adhesives modified by thiourethane additives

OBJECTIVES

Thio-urethane oligomeric additives have been shown to improve the mechanical properties of dental composites and resin cements. To try to harness those same properties in dental adhesives, in this study, these oligomers (TU) were added to the matrix and/or as filler functionalization of experimental adhesives, and the effects on conversion and mechanical properties were analyzed.

METHODS

BisGMA and HEMA (60/40 wt%) were used as the monomer matrix, made polymerizable by the addition of 0.2 wt% 2,2-dimethoxy-2- phenylacetophenone. 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol was added at 0.5 wt% as the inhibitor. This material was used as the unfilled control (BH). TU oligomers were added at 20 wt % to the matrix (BH+20%TU, unfilled) and/or used as filler functionalization (TF, 10 wt%). Fillers functionalized with methacrylate (MF, 10 wt%) served as the control. The experimental adhesives groups containing fillers were: BH+10%MF; BH+10%TF; BH+20%TU+10%MF; BH+20%TU+10%TF. Flexural properties were tested in three-point bending (wet and dry). Polymerization kinetics was followed in real-time in near-IR. Water Sorption/Solubility (WS/SL, ISO 4049) and Viscosity (rotational rheometry) were also evaluated. For Microtensile bond strength 40 vol% ethanol was added to adhesives, which was applied onto sound dentin from third human molars. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test, and test t for the comparison between storage time of the microtensile bond strength test (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups when yield strength (YS) and flexural modulus (FM) were evaluated in dry conditions. After water storage, all the groups containing TU in the matrix showed statistically lower YS/FM values. This was true in spite of the statistically higher conversion for those same groups. The maximum rate of polymerization (Rpmax) was higher for BH+10%TF and no significant difference was found for the groups BH and BH+10% MF. The lowest Rpmax values were found for BH+20%TU+10%TF and BH+20%TU. BH+20%TU+10%TF showed the highest viscosity values followed by BH+20%TU+10%MF and BH+20%TU, with statistically significant difference between them. For the microtensile bond strength test at 24h (p = 0.13) and 6 months (p = 0.11) and WS/SL (p > 0.05), no significant difference was found among groups. The storage time (24 h and 6 months) did not affect the microtensile bond strength results.

CONCLUSION

In spite of improving the conversion, the addition of TU in the matrix reduced the mechanical properties of the adhesives tested after water storage. This did not affect the bond strength at 24 h or 6 months.

Development of a micro-scale method to assess the effect of corrosion on the mechanical properties of a biodegradable Fe-316L stent material

The application of biodegradable materials to stent design has the potential to transform coronary artery disease treatment. It is critical that biodegradable stents have sustained strength during degradation and vessel healing to prevent re-occlusion. Proper assessment of the impact of corrosion on the mechanical behaviour of potential biomaterials is important. Investigations within literature frequently implement simplified testing conditions to understand this behaviour and fail to consider size effects associated with strut thickness, or the increase in corrosion due to blood flow, both of which can impact material properties. A protocol was developed that utilizes micro-scale specimens, in conjunction with dynamic degradation, to assess the effect of corrosion on the mechanical properties of a novel Fe-316L material. Dynamic degradation led to increased specimen corrosion, resulting in a greater reduction in strength after 48 h of degradation in comparison to samples statically corroded. It was found that thicker micro-tensile samples (h > 200 μm) had a greater loss of strength in comparison to its thinner counterpart (h < 200 μm), due to increased corrosion of the thicker samples (203 MPa versus 260 MPa after 48 h, p = 0.0017). This investigation emphasizes the necessity of implementing physiologically relevant testing conditions, including dynamic corrosion and stent strut thickness, when evaluating potential biomaterials for biodegradable stent application.

Assessment of Bonding Effectiveness of Adhesive Materials to Tooth Structure using Bond Strength Test Methods: A Review of Literature

Background

The rapid developments in the field of adhesive dental materials have led to improvements in many aspects of clinical dentistry. Adhesive bond strength plays an important role in determining the clinical performance and longevity of dental restorations. Nevertheless, bond strength tests have never been well-standardized, although a number of important recommendations have been made.

Objective

The aim of this paper is to critically review the validity of different bond strength testing methods for assessment of bonding effectiveness of adhesive materials to tooth structure and discuss factors that may affect bond strength measurement.

Data Collection

Relevant literature published between 1983 and 2018 was collected and reviewed from the PubMed database and Google scholar resources.

Review Results

Results of the current bond testing methods should be used to compare materials tested under the same laboratory settings, but they shouldn't be used to make direct inferences on their clinical behaviour. Shear and micro-shear tests, result in non-uniform stress distribution, stress concentration at the substrate area, and predominantly tensile stresses rather than shear stresses. Micro-tensile bond tests provide many advantages over the shear tests, although these methods are technique sensitive and labour intensive.

Conclusion

Bond strength testing methods should be well-standardized, but there are many factors that cannot be fully controlled which leads to variation and misinterpretation of the data about the bonding abilities of adhesives.

Clinical Significance

New adhesive materials should be subjected to a combination of testing protocols to properly assess their bonding effectiveness.