Does adherence to epilepsy quality measures correlate with reduced epilepsy-related adverse hospitalizations? A retrospective experience

Adherence to epilepsy quality indicators in a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Quality indicators play an important role in healthcare quality and patient safety. The aim of this study is to identify specific clinical pharmacy interventions to improve adherence to quality indicators and minimize risks among patients with epilepsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, two-phase, observational study was conducted in a neurology outpatient clinic of a tertiary university hospital. In the first phase of the study, the rate of adherence to the quality indicators was evaluated with a checklist containing the quality indicators. In the second phase of the study, an expert panel meeting was convened to identify clinical pharmacist interventions to reduce the risks associated with non-adherence. The Fine-Kinney method was used to prioritize risks, and adherence rates with each quality improvement indicator (QI) were calculated.

RESULTS

The study found that adherence rates were highest for QIs involving estimating the number and type of seizures, providing medical treatment or referring patients with evidence of mood disorders to mental healthcare, and co-managing prenatal care for women with epilepsy. The most non-adherence rates were found in QIs involving quality-of-life assessment, daily folate supplementation, and addressing the decreased effectiveness of oral contraception. The annual review of information about educational issues was also poorly provided. An expert panel decided to integrate a clinical pharmacist into the outpatient clinic to improve medication adherence, side-effect assessment, drug interaction assessment, patient education, lifestyle-modification education, depression/suicide-related behavior screening, quality-of-life assessment, and effectiveness evaluation of oral contraceptives for female patients using enzyme-inducing ASM.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that medication adherence, assessment of side effects, drug interactions, and patient education are inadequately provided by neurologists in patients with epilepsy. Clinical pharmacists have a crucial role in reducing potential risks of non-adherence with quality indicators. By integrating clinical pharmacy services into routine epilepsy care processes, the quality of care can be improved. Future studies should focus on implementing these interventions and evaluating their impact on patient outcomes.

Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for epilepsy in China: A Delphi consensus study

OBJECTIVE

The quality and safety of epilepsy care are of great importance because seizures are unpredictable. The aim of this study was to develop a set of nursing-sensitive quality indicators (NSQIs) for assessing and improving the quality of epilepsy nursing care in China.

METHODS

An international literature review, a cross-sectional survey and a qualitative study were conducted to identify candidate NSQIs for epilepsy care and compile a questionnaire. Then, two rounds of electronic Delphi studies were conducted with a panel of 27 independent experts to identify the final NSQIs for epilepsy.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine candidate NSQIs were extracted for the Delphi process. The recovery rates in the first and second rounds of expert consultations were 92.6% and 96.2%, respectively. The experts' authority coefficients of the two rounds were 0.876 and 0.878, respectively. The Kendall W value of the two rounds ranged between 0.094 and 0.200 (p<0.001). Eight structure indicators, 9 process indicators and 7 outcome indicators that represented the following three domains were included in the set of NSQIs for epilepsy: nursing resource allocation, implementation of nursing care, and outcomes of patients with epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

These NSQIs for epilepsy provide a primary foundation for monitoring and improving the quality of epilepsy nursing care in China. However, the effects of these indicators on improvements in epilepsy care and outcomes in patients need to be verified in clinical practice.

Challenges of patients with epilepsy and measures for improving epilepsy care in western China: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the challenges that patients with epilepsy (PWEs) face and the opportunities or areas where changes in nursing care may improve epilepsy care in western China.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions based on a review of the literature were conducted at the epilepsy center of a tertiary hospital in western China. A total of 18 PWEs, 18 caregivers and 11 neurology nurses were interviewed by using purposive sampling. The data were transcribed verbatim, and a content analysis was used to conduct the framework analysis.

RESULTS

Three key themes were identified, namely, the impact of epilepsy, barriers to epilepsy management, and measures in nursing care for improving epilepsy care. Psychological stress, the side effects of drugs and accidental injury related to seizures were reported to be the main negative impacts on patients. Limited knowledge about epilepsy, poor adherence to therapy, and a lack of effective communication between patients and medical staff were the major barriers to epilepsy management. Strengthening health education, assessing the frequency and type of seizures, screening for psychological disorders and mental intervention, and maintaining continuity of care were identified as crucial measures for nurses to improve epilepsy care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the challenges among PWEs and opportunities for improving the quality of epilepsy care in western China. Limited knowledge and poor drug adherence are the main barriers to epilepsy management, which might be improved by more health education and continuing care provided by nurses. Assessing seizures, screening for psychological disorders and providing appropriate psychological care would help improve epilepsy care.

Epilepsy quality performance in a national sample of neurologists and primary care providers: Characterizing trends in acute and chronic care management

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy-specific quality indicators and performance measures have been published and revised multiple times. The application of epilepsy-specific quality measures has been demonstrated in a few healthcare systems. However, there is no information to date on changes in epilepsy performance measures over time, and across settings, in a national sample. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system provides an opportunity to study the changes in epilepsy-specific performance over time, in acute versus chronic epilepsy care, as well as in primary versus specialty care.

METHODS

Chart extractions of newly diagnosed epilepsy and chronic care of Veterans with epilepsy within the VA system were performed. Veterans with ICD-9-CM diagnosis 345.XX and 780.39 from 2007-2014 were identified. Epilepsy-specific performance measures based on the Quality Indicators in Epilepsy Treatment (QUIET) VA measurement were ascertained for each Veteran with epilepsy. Difference in care across time (2009, 2012, and 2014), source of epilepsy care (primary care only, neurology only, and shared care between neurology and primary care) was analyzed. Differences in proportion of care measures across variables were compared using chi-square statistics.

RESULTS

Chart reviews of 2386 Veterans with epilepsy included 297 women (11.2%), 281 (10.5%) receiving acute care and 2105 (89.5%) receiving chronic care. Across all years 203 (72.5%) had electroencephalograph ordered/performed, 225 (80.4%) had neuroimaging ordered/performed, 106 (37.9%) were instructed about driving precautions, 71 (25.4%) were educated about safety and injury prevention, and 251 (89.6%) had anti-seizure medication monotherapy initiated. The proportion of people with new-onset seizures educated about diagnosis and type of seizure increased over time 30 (34.9%) in 2008, 42 (43.8%) in 2012, and 52 (53.1%). Of the 2105 Veterans receiving chronic care 864 (41.1%) encounters documented compliance of anti-seizure medication, 361 (17.15%) encounters addressed driving restrictions, 1345 (63.9%) encounters documented general education and counseling, 250 (11.9%) of encounters documented safety and injury prevention, 488 (23.2%) of encounters documented medication side effects, and 463 (22.0%) of encounters documented discussion of treatment options. With chronic epilepsy care, documentation of quality measures did not change with time. Veterans who were co-managed by primary care and neurology had a higher proportion of driving instruction and safety instructions compared to neurology or primary care alone.

DISCUSSION

In general, the epilepsy performance measures were high (>70% of new-onset epilepsy) for documentation diagnostic procedures (such as EEG and neuroimaging) and low across key educational and counseling measures (<50%). Despite the emphasis on the importance of psychosocial education and holistic management in the academic literature, through advocacy work, and during professional meetings, there was not a significant improvement in education and counseling over time. Some aspects of psychosocial education were performed better among primary care providers compared to neurologists. However, more attention and work need to be dedicated on implementing and documenting education and counseling people with epilepsy in the clinical setting.

Measuring the impact of epilepsy on families

OBJECTIVE

Caring for a child with illness or a child with disability impacts family in various ways. The ability to assess the impact of this care on families is one way to proactively provide the necessary support and resources for impacted families. Accordingly, the goal of the current study was to assess the impact of pediatric epilepsy on individual families in a comprehensive epilepsy clinic using a slightly modified version of the Impact on Families Scale (IFS).

METHODS

Families of patients with epilepsy completed the IFS up to three times. The IFS score and the six categories (i.e., total impact, financial impact, general impact, family/social impact, coping, and sibling impact) were assessed using Student's two sample t-test to determine the differences between binary groups and Pearson's correlation to assess the associations with continuous variables. Linear regression modeling was used to develop a model to predict IFS score.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-one patients completed the scale at one time point, 314 at two time points, and 61 at three time points. The overall impact of epilepsy on families was 109 (95% confidence interval (CI): 106-112) at time point 1, 111 (95% CI: 108-114) at time point 2, and 112 (95% CI: 105-119) at time point 3. There was no statistical difference in IFS score among the three time points. There were no associations with age or gender. Multivariable modeling using stepwise regression indicated that treatment resistance and seizure-free status were associated with IFS score. No interaction effects were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the current study suggest that the impact of epilepsy is highest for families that have children with active seizures at the time of their clinical visit and for those with children having treatment-resistant epilepsy. Although intuitive, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that has empirically verified these findings.

Assessment of Parkinson disease quality measures on 12-month patient outcomes

Background

Quality measures (QMs) exist to operationalize guidelines by measuring adherence to guidelines through documentation, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Studies are rare looking at the relationship between adherence to Parkinson disease (PD) QMs and patient outcomes.

Methods

We assessed adherence of our movement disorders specialists (MDSs) to the American Academy of Neurology's 2010 PD QM set through chart review using the measure set work group's criteria of documentation. We then evaluated patient outcomes to see whether there was a correlation with adherence to these QMs.

Results

Ninety-seven consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean disease duration was 9.3 (5.8) years. All patients were assessed by 1 of 4 MDSs. A total of 68% of QMs were documented across all patients. There was a small positive correlation between the number of documented QMs the year before the index visit and the number of calls/emails both the year before and after the index visit (r = 0.20, p = 0.04 and r = 0.26, p = 0.01, respectively.) There was a small negative correlation between the number of documented QMs and the number of PD follow-up visits the year after the index visit (r = -0.19, p = 0.05.) No other outcome showed a statistically significant correlation with the adherence to documented QMs.

Conclusions

We found no clinically important improvement in patient outcomes with higher adherence levels. It is important that QM developers validate QMs to ensure that they fulfill the intended goal of improved patient outcomes.

Improving Folic Acid Supplementation Rates in Women of Childbearing Age With Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

This study aims to improve the rate of folic acid supplementation to adolescent women with epilepsy on an antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen seen by the pediatric neurology providers at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore, in compliance with the 2009 American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society practice parameter.

METHODS

We designed a quality improvement study with implementation of a series of interventions and compared folic acid supplementation rates before and after intervention. We made additional comparisons based on specific age groups (12 to 15 years and 16 to 21 years) and a diagnosis with or without developmental impairment.

RESULTS

A review of 1850 charts from 2004 to 2015 showed an average folic acid prescription rate of 41%. Supplementation rates gradually increased to 52.2%, 58.5%, 60.3%, and finally up to 81.6% after this respective intervention: initial email reminder, provider education, posting signs in examination rooms, and implementation of an electronic medical record best practice advisory. There was improvement across all categories, in both age groups (12 to 15 years and 16 to 21 years) and in those with or without developmental impairment. There was a trend for higher compliance rates in adolescents without developmental impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our interventions resulted in an increase in folic acid supplementation rates of adolescent women with epilepsy. These results are encouraging. We plan to extend education about the recommendations for folic acid supplementation to non-neurology providers, as well as expand to apply our interventions and assess adherence to other defined epilepsy quality measures.

Improved availability and quality of care with epilepsy nurse practitioners

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the quality of care delivered by nurse practitioner (NP)-physician teams employed to expand clinic appointment availability for patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with epilepsy presenting to the Penn Epilepsy Center for a new patient appointment in 2014. During this time, patients were seen either by an NP-physician team care model or a more traditional physician-only care model. These care models were compared with regard to adherence to the 2014 American Academy of Neurology epilepsy quality measures at the initial visit. Clinical outcomes of seizure frequency, presentations to the Emergency Department, injury, and death were assessed over the subsequent year.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients were identified by our inclusion and exclusion criteria: 65 patients in the NP-physician team care model cohort and 104 patients in the physician-only care model cohort. The NP-physician team care model saw, on average, 3 more patients per clinic session. There were no meaningful differences between these cohorts in baseline characteristics. The NP-physician team care model showed equivalent adherence to the physician-only care model for the epilepsy quality measures, with superior adherence to the counseling measures of querying for side effects, provision of personalized epilepsy safety education, and screening for behavioral health disorders. The 2 care models performed similarly in all clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An NP-physician team care model employed to increase availability of care could also improve quality of care delivered.

Neurologist adherence to clinical practice guidelines and costs in patients with newly diagnosed and chronic epilepsy in Germany

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate physician adherence to the German Neurological Society guidelines of 2008 regarding initial monotherapy and to determine the cost-of-illness in epilepsy.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study using health data routinely collected at 55 outpatient neurology practices throughout Germany (NeuroTransData network). Data on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, anticonvulsive treatment, and direct and indirect costs were recorded using practice software-based questionnaires.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred eighty-four patients with epilepsy (785 male (49.6%); mean age: 51.3±18.1years) were enrolled, of whom 507 were newly diagnosed. Initial monotherapy was started according to authorization status in 85.9%, with nonenzyme-inducing drugs in 94.3% of all AEDs. Drugs of first choice by guideline recommendations were used in 66.5%. Total annual direct costs in the first year amounted to €2194 (SD: €4273; range: €55-43,896) per patient, with hospitalization (59% of total direct costs) and anticonvulsants (30%) as the main cost factors. Annual total direct costs decreased by 29% to €1572 in the second year, mainly because of a 59% decrease in hospitalization costs. The use of first choice AEDs did not influence costs. Chronic epilepsy was present in 1077 patients, and total annual direct costs amounted to €1847 per patient, with anticonvulsants (51.0%) and hospitalization (41.0%) as the main cost factors. Potential cost-driving factors in these patients were active epilepsy and focal epilepsy syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This study shows excellent physician adherence to guidelines regarding initial monotherapy in adults with epilepsy. Newly diagnosed patients show higher total direct and hospital costs in the first year upon diagnosis, but these are not influenced by adherence to treatment guidelines.

Educational Intervention Improves Compliance With AAN Guidelines for Return Epilepsy Visits: A Quality Improvement Project

In 2011, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) released guidelines for return seizure visits detailing 8 points that should be addressed during such visits. These guidelines are designed to improve routine follow-up care for epilepsy patients. The authors performed a quality improvement project aimed at increasing compliance with these guidelines after educating providers about them. The authors performed a chart review before and after an intervention which included: education regarding the guidelines, providing materials to remind providers of the guidelines, and templates to facilitate compliance. The authors reviewed charts at 2 and 6 months after the intervention. Significant improvement in documentation of 4 of the 8 measures was observed after this educational intervention. This suggests that simple educational interventions may help providers change practice and can improve compliance with new guidelines while requiring minimal time and resources to implement.

Patient perceptions of physician-documented quality care in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare physician encounter documentation with patient perceptions of quality of epilepsy care and examine the association between quality and patient assessment of provider communication.

METHODS

We identified 505 adult patients with epilepsy aged 18years or older over a 3-year period in two large academic medical centers. We abstracted individual, clinical, and care measures from 2723 electronic clinical notes written by physicians. We then randomly selected 245 patients for a phone interview. We compared patient perceptions of care with the documented care for several established epilepsy quality measures. We also explored the association of patient's perception of provider communication with provider documentation of key encounter interventions.

RESULTS

There were 88 patients (36%) who completed the interviews. Fifty-seven (24%) refused to participate, and 100 (40%) could not be contacted. Participants and nonparticipants were comparable in their demographic and clinical characteristics; however, participants were more often seen by epilepsy specialists than nonparticipants (75% vs. 61.9%, p<0.01). Quality scores based on patient perceptions differed from those determined by assessing the documentation in the medical record for several quality measures, e.g., documentation of side effects of antiseizure therapy (p=0.05), safety counseling (p<0.01), and counseling for women of childbearing potential with epilepsy (McNemar's p=0.03; intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC=0.07). There was a significant, positive association between patient-reported counseling during the encounter (e.g., personalized safety counseling) and patient-reported scores of provider communication (p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between the patient's recollection of counseling during the visit and his/her positive perception of the provider's communication skills highlights the importance of spending time counseling patients about their epilepsy and not just determining if seizures are controlled.

Guidelines and Quality Standards for Adults with Epilepsy

Guidelines and quality measures for epilepsy care have the potential to improve the quality of epilepsy care. Quality measures are increasingly used for pay-for-performance. This article describes different guidelines and quality measures that have been used to identify best practices, types of best practices for use in clinical care developed using each of these approaches, and information on how to interpret the recommendations in specific guidelines and quality measures described elsewhere in this issue.

Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications

OBJECTIVE

To determine the adherence status to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among epilepsy patients; to observe the association between adherence status and age, sex, active ingredient prescribed, treatment period, and number of comorbidities; and to determine the effect of nonadherence on direct medicine treatment cost of AEDs.

METHODS

A retrospective study analyzing medicine claims data obtained from a South African pharmaceutical benefit management company was performed. Patients of all ages (N=19,168), who received more than one prescription for an AED, were observed from 2008 to 2013. The modified medicine possession ratio (MPRm) was used as proxy to determine the adherence status to AED treatment. The MPRm was considered acceptable (adherent) if the calculated value was ≥80%, but ≤110%, whereas an MPRm of <80% (unacceptably low) or >110% (unacceptably high) was considered nonadherent. Direct medicine treatment cost was calculated by summing the medical scheme contribution and patient co-payment associated with each AED prescription.

RESULTS

Only 55% of AEDs prescribed to 19,168 patients during the study period had an acceptable MPRm. MPRm categories depended on the treatment period (P>0.0001; Cramer's V=0.208) but were independent of sex (P<0.182; Cramer's V=0.009). Age group (P<0.0001; Cramer's V=0.067), active ingredient (P<0.0001; Cramer's V=0.071), and number of comor-bidities (P<0.0001; Cramer's V=0.050) were statistically but not practically significantly associated with MPRm categories. AEDs with an unacceptably high MPRm contributed to 3.74% (US$736,376.23) of the total direct cost of all AEDs included in the study, whereas those with an unacceptably low MPRm amounted to US$3,227,894.85 (16.38%).

CONCLUSION

Nonadherence to antiepileptic treatment is a major problem, encompassing ~20% of cost in our study. Adherence, however, is likely to improve with the treatment period. Further research is needed to determine the factors influencing epileptic patients' prescription refill adherence.