Long‐term efficacy of add‐on stiripentol treatment in children, adolescents, and young adults with refractory epilepsies: A single center prospective observational study

Use of Stiripentol in Patients with Dravet Syndrome: Common Practice Among Experts in Spain

BACKGROUND

Despite considerable evidence for the efficacy and safety of stiripentol in Dravet syndrome (DS), some aspects of stiripentol use remain challenging in clinical practice, such as dose titration and the adjustment of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) to prevent potential adverse effects.

AIM

To (1) provide practical recommendations on the initiation of stiripentol treatment in patients with DS, (2) evaluate its effectiveness in the patient, and (3) guide the management of drug interactions and other aspects of treatment monitoring.

METHODS

Six Spanish neurologists (the authors) with expertise in the management of pediatric and adult patients with DS held a meeting in early 2024 to develop expert recommendations regarding the use of stiripentol in DS, based on a review of the literature and their common clinical experience.

RESULTS

According to these recommendations, stiripentol can be administered to patients with DS of any age, although its initiation and titration vary according to age group. Individualized adjustment of concomitant ASMs, such as valproic acid and clobazam or drugs specifically for DS (i.e., fenfluramine), at initiation and during stiripentol treatment, can mitigate drug interactions, thereby increasing the long-term tolerability of stiripentol treatment. In specific cases, stiripentol doses of > 50 mg/kg/day may be contemplated, and acute stiripentol administration may be considered to control refractory status epilepticus. Blood tests should be performed before starting stiripentol, at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting treatment, and then annually, except in the event of adverse effects, when additional testing may be necessary. Most adverse effects can be adequately managed by adjusting concomitant medications.

CONCLUSION

These practical recommendations may be easily adapted for use in different countries, and should increase physicians' confidence in the initiation and monitoring of stiripentol treatment, thus facilitating effective management of patients with DS and improving clinical outcomes.

Stiripentol for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies and an acutely life-threatening condition characterized by high mortality and morbidity. Despite the well-established staged therapy of status epilepticus, especially stages 1 and 2, more than one third of patients develop (super-) refractory SE. Despite a large variety of potential treatment options for super-refractory SE, there is an unmet clinical need of potential new treatment ideas in this often desperate clinical situation. A number of studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of stiripentol (STP) in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) and in children with focal epilepsy and generalized epilepsies. Some smaller series and case reports have documented the use of STP in the treatment of status epilepticus in adult patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who were admitted to the Department of Neurology at Marburg University Hospital between 2013 and 2023 with a diagnosis of (super)-refractory status epilepticus and who received additional treatment of SE with STP. All patients who received STP during the SE were included, regardless of previous medication.

RESULTS

SE ceased in 64% of 25 patients (13 female and 12 male). The mean age was 58.6 ± 21.9 years (mean ± SD). 72% had a structural epilepsy. In 20% of patients, SE was terminated by the administration of STP alone in 32% of cases, while in a further 32% of patients, the simultaneous administration of multiple anti-seizure medications (ASMs) including STP was potentially responsible for the cessation of the SE, with valproic acid (VPA), benzodiazepines and STP, being the most frequently implicated ASMs. In 12% of patients, there was at least a temporary improvement in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Stiripentol had to be discontinued in three cases due to a reduction in vigilance or hypercalcemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Stiripentol may represent a promising additional treatment option for refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus. The tolerability of this treatment has already been demonstrated in previous studies, and was also reflected in these data. Further prospective investigation in larger patient populations are necessary to ascertain the efficacy of stiripentol in SE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06540378, retrospectively registered.

Efficacy and tolerability of add-on stiripentol in real-world clinical practice: An observational study in Dravet syndrome and non-Dravet developmental and epileptic encephalopathies

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and tolerability of stiripentol (STP) as adjunctive treatment in Dravet syndrome and non-Dravet refractory developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DREEs).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of all children and adults with DREE and prescribed adjunctive STP at Hospital Ruber Internacional from January 2000 to February 2023. Outcomes were retention rate, responder rate (proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in total seizure frequency relative to baseline), seizure freedom rate, responder rate for status epilepticus, rate of adverse event and individual adverse events, reported at 3, 6, and 12 months and at final visit. Seizure outcomes are reported overall, and for Dravet and non-Dravet subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients (55 Dravet syndrome and 27 non-Dravet DREE) were included. Median age was 5 years (range 1-59 years), and median age of epilepsy onset was younger in the Dravet group (4.9 [3.6-6] months) than non-Dravet (17.9 [6-42.3], P < 0.001). Median follow-up time STP was 24.1 months (2 years; range 0.3-164 months) and was longer in the Dravet group (35.9 months; range 0.8-164) than non-Dravet (17 months range 0.3-62.3, P < 0.001). At 12 months, retention rate, responder rate and seizure free rate was 68.3% (56/82), 65% [48-77%] and 18% [5.7-29%], respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between groups on these seizure outcomes. Adverse events were reported in 46.3% of patients (38/82), without differences between groups.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this population of patients with epileptic and developmental encephalopathies, outcomes with adjunctive STP were similar in patients with non-Dravet DREE to patients with Dravet syndrome.

Research Status, Synthesis and Clinical Application of Antiepileptic Drugs

According to the 2017 ILAE's official definition, epilepsy is a slow brain disease state characterized by recurrent episodes. Due to information released by ILAE in 2017, it can be divided into four types, including focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined generalized, and focal epilepsy, and unknown epilepsy. Since 1989, 24 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved to treat different types of epilepsy. Besides, there are a variety of antiepileptic medications under clinical monitoring. These novel antiepileptic drugs have plenty of advantages. Over the past 33 years, there have been many antiepileptic drugs on the mearket, but no one has been found that can completely cure epilepsy. In this paper, the mentioned drugs were classified according to their targets, and the essential information, and clinical studies of each drug were described. The structure-activity relationship of different chemical structures was summarized. This paper provides help for the follow-up research on epilepsy drugs.

Impact of Antiseizure Medications on Appetite and Weight in Children

There are numerous potential factors that may affect growth in children with epilepsy, and these must be evaluated in any child with appetite and weight concerns. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) have potential adverse effects, and many may affect appetite, thus impacting normal growth and weight gain. The aim of this review is to focus on the impact of both epilepsy and ASMs on appetite and weight in children. We systematically reviewed studies using Medline assessing the impact of ASMs on appetite and weight in children. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and open-label studies (open-label extension and interventional) that targeted or included the pediatric population (0-18 years of age). Each study was classified using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence for Therapeutic Studies, and the level of evidence for impact on appetite and weight in children was graded. ASMs associated with decreased appetite and/or weight loss include fenfluramine, topiramate, zonisamide, felbamate, rufinamide, stiripentol, cannabidiol, brivaracetam and ethosuximide; ASMs with minimal impact on weight and appetite in children include oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, carbamazepine, vigabatrin and clobazam. The ASM most robustly associated with increased appetite and/or weight gain is valproic acid; however, both pregabalin and perampanel may also lead to modest weight gain or increased appetite in children. Certain ASMs may impact both appetite and weight, which may lead to increased morbidity of the underlying disease and impaired adherence to the treatment regimen.

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Treatment with Stiripentol in Children and Adults with Drug-Resistant Epilepsies: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 196 Patients

BACKGROUND

Stiripentol is an antiseizure medication with multiple potential mechanisms of action, indicated as adjunctive therapy in people with Dravet syndrome, whose seizures are not adequately controlled with clobazam and valproate. However, there are scattered data on its efficacy in other epilepsy aetiologies and types. We previously reported our single-centre experience on the efficacy of adjunctive stiripentol treatment in a cohort of 132 patients with different types of refractory epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to expand our analysis to a larger cohort of 196 patients with a long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated long-term efficacy, tolerability and predictors of treatment response in 196 patients with a long-term follow-up (range 0.5-232.8 months).

RESULTS

After an initial median follow-up of 3 months after stiripentol introduction, we observed a responder rate of 53% including seizure freedom in 9%. At subsequent follow-ups at 12 and 24 months, responder rates were 29% and 22%, respectively. Aetiology was associated with sustained response over time, with Dravet syndrome being the aetiology with the highest responder rate (64%) at 48 months compared with syndromes with other genetic causes (13%) or unknown aetiology (38%). A higher responder rate over time was also observed in patients with generalised (44%) and combined focal and generalised epilepsies (28%) than in patients with focal epilepsies (20%). The highest relapse free-survival was observed when stiripentol was initiated at the youngest age (0-4 years) or in adulthood. The retention rate (i.e. proportion of patients who continued stiripentol with no change in either pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy) was 53% at 12 months and 33% at 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we suggest that stiripentol is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option not only in Dravet syndrome but also in other epilepsy syndromes with or without an established genetic aetiology. Response duration was influenced by age at stiripentol initiation across different aetiologies.

Monogenic Epilepsies: Disease Mechanisms, Clinical Phenotypes, and Targeted Therapies

A monogenic etiology can be identified in up to 40% of people with severe epilepsy. To address earlier and more appropriate treatment strategies, clinicians are required to know the implications that specific genetic causes might have on pathophysiology, natural history, comorbidities, and treatment choices. In this narrative review, we summarize concepts on the genetic epilepsies based on the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and present the current knowledge on treatment options based on evidence provided by controlled trials or studies with lower classification of evidence. Overall, evidence robust enough to guide antiseizure medication (ASM) choices in genetic epilepsies remains limited to the more frequent conditions for which controlled trials and observational studies have been possible. Most monogenic disorders are very rare and ASM choices for them are still based on inferences drawn from observational studies and early, often anecdotal, experiences with precision therapies. Precision medicine remains applicable to only a narrow number of patients with monogenic epilepsies and may target only part of the actual functional defects. Phenotypic heterogeneity is remarkable, and some genetic mutations activate epileptogenesis through their developmental effects, which may not be reversed postnatally. Other genes seem to have pure functional consequences on excitability, acting through either loss- or gain-of-function effects, and these may have opposite treatment implications. In addition, the functional consequences of missense mutations may be difficult to predict, making precision treatment approaches considerably more complex than estimated by deterministic interpretations. Knowledge of genetic etiologies can influence the approach to surgical treatment of focal epilepsies. Identification of germline mutations in specific genes contraindicates surgery while mutations in other genes do not. Identification, quantification, and functional characterization of specific somatic mutations before surgery using CSF liquid biopsy or after surgery in brain specimens will likely be integrated in planning surgical strategies and reintervention after a first unsuccessful surgery as initial evidence suggests that mutational load may correlate with the epileptogenic zone. Promising future directions include gene manipulation by DNA or mRNA targeting; although most are still far from clinical use, some are in early phase clinical development.

Precision Medicine Approaches for Infantile-Onset Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

Epilepsy is an etiologically heterogeneous condition; however, genetic factors are thought to play a role in most patients. For those with infantile-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE), a genetic diagnosis is now obtained in more than 50% of patients. There is considerable motivation to utilize these molecular diagnostic data to help guide treatment, as children with DEEs often have drug-resistant seizures as well as developmental impairment related to cerebral epileptiform activity. Precision medicine approaches have the potential to dramatically improve the quality of life for these children and their families. At present, treatment can be targeted for patients with diagnoses in many genetic causes of infantile-onset DEE, including genes encoding sodium or potassium channel subunits, tuberous sclerosis, and congenital metabolic diseases. Precision medicine may refer to more intelligent choices of conventional antiseizure medications, repurposed agents previously used for other indications, novel compounds, enzyme replacement, or gene therapy approaches. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Volume 62 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Small Molecule-Based Enzyme Inhibitors in the Treatment of Primary Hyperoxalurias

Primary hyperoxalurias (PHs) are a group of inherited alterations of the hepatic glyoxylate metabolism. PHs classification based on gene mutations parallel a variety of enzymatic defects, and all involve the harmful accumulation of calcium oxalate crystals that produce systemic damage. These geographically widespread rare diseases have a deep impact in the life quality of the patients. Until recently, treatments were limited to palliative measures and kidney/liver transplants in the most severe forms. Efforts made to develop pharmacological treatments succeeded with the biotechnological agent lumasiran, a siRNA product against glycolate oxidase, which has become the first effective therapy to treat PH1. However, small molecule drugs have classically been preferred since they benefit from experience and have better pharmacological properties. The development of small molecule inhibitors designed against key enzymes of glyoxylate metabolism is on the focus of research. Enzyme inhibitors are successful and widely used in several diseases and their pharmacokinetic advantages are well known. In PHs, effective enzymatic targets have been determined and characterized for drug design and interesting inhibitory activities have been achieved both in vitro and in vivo. This review describes the most recent advances towards the development of small molecule enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of PHs, introducing the multi-target approach as a more effective and safe therapeutic option.

Fenfluramine HCl (Fintepla® ) provides long-term clinically meaningful reduction in seizure frequency: Analysis of an ongoing open-label extension study

OBJECTIVE

Fenfluramine has been shown to provide clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in convulsive seizure frequency in children and adolescents (aged 2-18 years) with Dravet syndrome in two randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The objective of this analysis was to assess longer-term safety and efficacy of fenfluramine in patients who completed one of the double-blind studies and entered an open-label extension (OLE) study.

METHODS

Patients enrolling in the OLE study initiated fenfluramine at 0.2 mg/kg/d regardless of their treatment assignment in the double-blind study. After 4 weeks, the fenfluramine dose could be titrated based on efficacy and tolerability to maximum of 0.7 mg/kg/d (absolute maximum 27 mg/d) or maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/d (absolute maximum 17 mg/d) in patients receiving concomitant stiripentol. The number and type of seizures were recorded daily in an electronic diary, and safety, including echocardiography, was assessed at Months 1, 2, and 3, and at 3-month intervals thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients were enrolled as of March 13, 2018. During this analysis period, patients were treated for a median 256 days (range = 46-634 days). Over the entire OLE analysis period, the median decrease in convulsive seizure frequency compared to baseline in the double-blind studies was -66.8% (range = -100% to 234.9%; P < .001). The median reduction in seizure frequency was similar in patients <6 (-75.7%) and ≥6 years old (-64.7%). The most commonly reported adverse events included pyrexia (21.6%), nasopharyngitis (19.4%), and decreased appetite (-15.9%). No valvular heart disease (VHD) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was observed.

SIGNIFICANCE

Study results demonstrate that fenfluramine provides clinically meaningful (≥50%) seizure frequency reduction over an extended period in patients with Dravet syndrome. No patient developed VHD or PAH, and fenfluramine was generally well tolerated.

A retrospective review of changes and challenges in the use of antiseizure medicines in Dravet syndrome in Norway

OBJECTIVE

Dravet syndrome is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by severe and drug-resistant seizures in early childhood, followed by developmental delay. The purpose of this study was to investigate aspects of pharmacological treatment of Norwegian patients with Dravet syndrome, focusing on the use of antiseizure medicines (ASMs) and identifying treatment challenges.

METHODS

Patients were identified through medical registries at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway and National Center for Rare Epilepsy Related Disorders during 2008-2018. Additional clinical data were obtained from medical records and laboratory request forms.

RESULTS

We identified 53 patients with Dravet syndrome, 30/23 males/females, aged 2-50 years. The majority of patients with known seizure frequency experienced frequent seizures, 80% (n = 35/44). Only two patients were seizure-free. Valproate (n = 48), clobazam (n = 45), levetiracetam (n = 30), and stiripentol (n = 38) were most commonly used, previous or current use. More than one-third (n = 20) had tried sodium channel blockers (including lamotrigine), but these drugs were used less during the last decade. Polytherapy was common, 81% (n = 43) used two or more ASMs, and eight of these patients used 4-5 drugs (15%). Several challenges were identified: high seizure frequency, comorbidities, treatment changes with a wide range of ASMs, common use of oral gastro-tubes, extensive polypharmacy, and drug interactions.

SIGNIFICANCE

The use of ASMs has changed over the last decade, in accordance with updated international recommendations. Various treatment challenges were identified. This vulnerable group of patients needs close follow-up for an optimal treatment outcome.

Therapeutic advances in Dravet syndrome: a targeted literature review

INTRODUCTION

Dravet syndrome (DS), a prototypic developmental and genetic epileptic encephalopathy (DEE), is characterized by an early onset of treatment-refractory seizures, together with impairments in motor control, behavior, and cognition. Even with multiple conventional anti-epileptic drugs, seizures remain poorly controlled, and there has been a considerable unmet need for effective and tolerable treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This targeted literature review aims to highlight recent changes to the therapeutic landscape for DS by summarizing the most up-to-date, evidence-based research, including pivotal data from the clinical development of stiripentol, cannabidiol, and fenfluramine, which are important milestones for DS treatment, together with the latest findings of other pharmacotherapies in development. In phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials stiripentol, cannabidiol, and fenfluramine have shown clinically relevant reductions in convulsive seizure frequency, and are generally well tolerated. Stiripentol was associated with responder rates (greater than 50% reduction in convulsive seizure frequency) of 67%-71%, when added to valproic acid and clobazam; cannabidiol was associated with responder rates of 43%-49% (48%-63% in conjunction with clobazam), and fenfluramine of 54%-68% across studies. Therapies in development include soticlestat, ataluren, verapamil, and clemizole, with strategies to treat the underlying cause of DS, including gene therapy and antisense oligonucleotides beginning to emerge from preclinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the challenges of drug development in rare diseases, this is an exciting time for the treatment of DS, with the promise of new efficacious and well-tolerated therapies, which may pave the way for treatment advances in other DEEs.