Value of genetic testing for pediatric epilepsy: Driving earlier diagnosis of CLN2 Batten disease

A needle in a haystack? The impact of a targeted epilepsy gene panel in the identification of a treatable but rapidly progressive metabolic epilepsy: CLN2 disease

BACKGROUND

 Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL) are a group of autosomal recessive, inherited, lysosomal, and neurodegenerative diseases that causes progressive dementia, seizures, movement disorders, language delay/regression, progressive visual failure, and early death. Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2), caused by biallelic pathogenic variants of the TPP1 gene, is the only NCL with an approved targeted therapy. The laboratory diagnosis of CLN2 is established through highly specific tests, leading to diagnostic delays and eventually hampering the provision of specific treatment for patients with CLN2. Epilepsy is a common and clinically-identifiable feature among NCLs, and seizure onset is the main driver for families to seek medical care.

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the results of the Latin America Epilepsy and Genetics Program, an epilepsy gene panel, as a comprehensive tool for the investigation of CLN2 among other genetic causes of epilepsy.

METHODS

 A total of 1,284 patients with epilepsy without a specific cause who had at least 1 symptom associated with CLN2 were screened for variants in 160 genes associated with epilepsy or metabolic disorders presenting with epilepsy through an epilepsy gene panel.

RESULTS

 Variants of the TPP1 gene were identified in 25 individuals (1.9%), 21 of them with 2 variants. The 2 most frequently reported variants were p.Arg208* and p.Asp276Val, and 2 novel variants were detected in the present study: p.Leu308Pro and c.89 + 3G > C Intron 2.

CONCLUSION

 The results suggest that these genetic panels can be very useful tools to confirm or exclude CLN2 diagnosis and, if confirmed, provide disease-specific treatment for the patients.

Next generation of free? Points to consider when navigating sponsored genetic testing

Genetics has been integrated into patient care across many subspecialties. However, genetic and genomic testing (GT) remain expensive with disparities in access both within Canada and internationally. It is, therefore, not surprising that sponsored GT has emerged as one alternative. Sponsored GT, for the purpose of this document, refers to clinical-grade GT partially or fully subsidised by industry. In return, industry sponsors-usually pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies-may have access to patients' genetic data, practitioner information, DNA and/or other information. The availability of sponsored GT options in the Canadian healthcare landscape has appeared to simplify patient and practitioner access to GT, but the potential ethical and legal considerations, as well as the nuances of a publicly funded healthcare system, must also be considered. This document offers preliminary guidance for Canadian healthcare practitioners encountering sponsored GT in practice. Further research and dialogue is urgently needed to explore this issue to provide fulsome considerations that one must be aware of when availing such options.

Classic and Atypical Late Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis in Latin America: Clinical and Genetic Aspects, and Treatment Outcome with Cerliponase Alfa

Introduction

Late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2), is a neurodegenerative autosomal recessive disease caused by TPP1 gene variants, with a spectrum of classic and atypical phenotypes. The aim of treatment is to slow functional decline as early as possible in an attempt to improve quality of life and survival. This study describes the clinical characteristics as well as the response to treatment with cerliponase alfa.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was conducted in five Latin-American countries, using clinical records from patients with CLN2. Clinical follow-up and treatment variables are described. A descriptive and bivariate statistical analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 36 patients were observed (range of follow-up of 61-110 weeks post-treatment). At presentation, patients with the classic phenotype (n = 16) exhibited regression in language (90%), while seizures were the predominant symptom (87%) in patients with the atypical phenotype (n = 20). Median age of symptom onset and time to first specialized consultation was 3 (classical) and 7 (atypical) years, while the median time interval between onset of symptoms and treatment initiation was 4 years (classical) and 7.5 (atypical). The most frequent variant was c.827 A > T in 17/72 alleles, followed by c.622C > T in 6/72 alleles. All patients were treated with cerliponase alfa, and either remained functionally stable or had a loss of 1 point on the CLN2 scale, or up to 2 points on the Wells Cornel and Hamburg scales, when compared to pretreatment values.

Discussion and conclusion

This study reports the largest number of patients with CLN2 currently on treatment with cerliponase alfa in the world. Data show a higher frequency of patients with atypical phenotypes and a high allelic proportion of intron variants in our region. There was evidence of long intervals until first specialized consultation, diagnosis, and enzyme replacement therapy. Follow-up after the initiation of cerliponase alfa showed slower progression or stabilization of the disease, associated with adequate clinical outcomes and stable functional scores. These improvements were consistent in both clinical phenotypes.

Yield and Utility of Routine Epilepsy Panel Genetic Testing Among Young Patients With Seizures

Objective: We examined the yield of routine epilepsy panel genetic testing in pediatric patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed epilepsy genetic panel results routinely performed in the hospital or clinic on patients <8 years old from July 2021 to July 2023. We evaluated demographics, family history, seizure type, severity, and frequency, development, tone and movement abnormalities, dysmorphism, and electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results as predictors of results. Results: 65 patients were included with mean age 4.5 years. Sixty percent of patients were male; 11 patients had pathogenic variants (16.9%), 7 were carriers for autosomal recessive conditions (10.8%), 36 had variants of uncertain significance (55.4%), and 11 tested negative (16.9%). Pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance were unassociated with demographics, clinical features, imaging, or family history. Conclusion: Variants identified have potential implications for treatment (SCN1), comorbidity screening (TSC1), reproduction (ATAD1, PSAT1, and CLN8), and prognostication (FOXG1). Patients not routinely screened for a genetic cause of epilepsy by our standard practices had clinically relevant results.

Early genetic testing in pediatric epilepsy: Diagnostic and cost implications

The identification of numerous genetically based epilepsies has resulted in the widespread use of genetic testing to inform epilepsy etiology. Our study aims to investigate whether a difference exists in the diagnostic evaluation and healthcare-related cost expenditures of pediatric patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology who receive a genetic diagnosis through multigene epilepsy panel (MEP) testing and comparing those who underwent early (EGT) versus late genetic testing (LGT). Testing was defined as early (less than 1 year), or late (more than 1 year), following clinical epilepsy diagnosis. A retrospective chart review of pediatric individuals (1-17 years) with epilepsy of unknown etiology who underwent multigene epilepsy panel (MEP) testing identified 28 of 226 (12%) individuals with a pathogenic epilepsy variant [EGT n = 8 (29%); LGT n = 20 (71%)]. The average time from clinical epilepsy diagnosis to genetic diagnosis was 0.25 years (EGT), compared with 7.1 years (LGT). The EGT cohort underwent fewer metabolic tests [EGT n = 0 (0%); LGT n = 16 (80%) (P < 0.01)] and invasive procedures [EGT n = 0 (0%); LGT n = 5 (25%) (P = 0.06)]. Clinical management changes implemented due to genetic diagnosis occurred in 10 (36%) patients [EGT n = 2 (25%); LGT n = 8 (40%) (P = 0.76)]. Early genetic testing with a MEP in pediatric patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology who receive a genetic diagnosis is associated with fewer non-diagnostic tests and invasive procedures and reduced estimated overall healthcare-related costs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study aims to investigate whether a difference exists in the diagnostic evaluation and cost expenditures of pediatric patients (1-17 years) with epilepsy of unknown cause who are ultimately diagnosed with a genetic cause of epilepsy through multigene epilepsy panel testing and comparing those who underwent early testing (less than 1 year) versus late testing (more than 1 year) after clinical epilepsy diagnosis. Of the 28 of 226 individuals with a confirmed genetic cause of epilepsy on multigene epilepsy panel testing, performing early testing was associated with fewer non-diagnostic tests, fewer invasive procedures and reduced estimated overall healthcare-related costs.