Introduction to use of an acute seizure action plan for seizure clusters and guidance for implementation

Use of an Electronic Medical Record Alert to Prevent Iatrogenic Interventions in Patients With Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures

Background and Objectives

Seizures are a common presentation to the emergency department and the hospital setting. Psychogenic or functional seizures are often misdiagnosed as epileptic seizures or status epilepticus, and patients are subject to aggressive interventions including sedation, intubations, and prolonged hospital admissions. An electronic medical record (EMR) best practice alert (BPA) was implemented in 2016 for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) at Rush University Medical Center. It informs health care providers of the diagnosis and provides education on interacting with the patient's chart. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an EMR BPA in preventing iatrogenic interventions for patients with a diagnosis of PNES.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who presented to Rush University Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2019 and had a PNES BPA triggered. Data on emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient admissions for these patients from the year before and the year after the first BPA trigger were compared. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used for analysis.

Results

A PNES BPA was triggered in 178 patients. One hundred and forty-three (80%) were female. The mean age was 41 (18-81) years. There was a decrease in the number of ED visits; hospital admissions; intensive care unit (ICU) admissions; and interventions such as intubations and rescue benzodiazepine use in the year after the BPA was first triggered compared with the previous year (p < 0.05). No adverse events were identified in relation to the BPA.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that the use of an EMR BPA can be safe and effective in preventing potential iatrogenic interventions and reducing acute health care utilization in patients with PNES. These BPAs can also be used as an educational tool to communicate the presentation, risks, and needs of these patients within the hospital setting.

Community-onset pediatric status epilepticus: Barriers to care and outcomes in a real-world setting

OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency in childhood, often leading to neuronal damage and long-term outcomes. The study aims to identify barriers in the pre-hospital and in-hospital management of community-onset pediatric SE and to evaluate the effectiveness of pediatric scores on outcomes prediction.

METHODS

This monocentric observational retrospective cohort study included patients treated for community-onset pediatric SE in a tertiary care hospital between 2010 and 2021. Data were extracted following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were community-onset SE (according to the International League Against Epilepsy [ILAE] Task Force on SE Classification), admission to the pediatric emergency department (PED), age: 1 month to 18 years. Pre-hospital, in-hospital management and outcomes were analyzed. Pediatric scores for prediction of clinical worsening (Pediatric Early Warning Score - PEWS) and SE outcome (Status Epilepticus in Pediatric patients Severity Score - STEPSS; Pre-status Epilepticus PCPCS, background Electroencephalographic abnormalities, Drug refractoriness, Semiology and critical Sickness Score - PEDSS) were retrospectively assessed for their accuracy in predicting short-term and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 103 consecutive episodes of SE were included. Out-of-hospital rescue medications administration occurred in 54.4% of cases and was associated with higher SE resolution rate before PED admission (48.2% vs 27.6%, p = .033). Longer in-PED time to treatment was observed in case of delay to PED referral (r = 0.268, p = .048) or non-red triage labels (12 vs 5 min, p = 0.032), and was associated with longer in-PED duration of SE (r = 0.645, p < .001). Longer SE duration was observed in episodes leading to hospitalization compared to those discharged (50 vs 16 min, p < .001). In-PED electroencephalography (EEG) recordings were available in 39.8% of events. Predictive scores varied in accuracy, with PEWS ≥5 showing high sensitivity for intensive care unit (ICU) admission but low specificity. No patients died, 6.3% of SE was refractory.

SIGNIFICANCE

Effective pre-hospital administration of rescue medications and prompt PED management are crucial to reduce SE duration and improve outcomes. Predictive scores can aid in assessment of the severity and prognosis of SE; their utility is still not defined. Identifying and addressing actionable care barriers in SE management pathways is essential to enhance patient outcomes in pediatric SE.

Hope for the Best but Plan for the Worst: Seizure Action Plans in Adult Epilepsy Clinics

Evaluation of a Seizure Action Plan in an Adult Epilepsy Center Long L, Reynolds SS, Lewis LS, Webb MA, Epley C, Maturu S. Neurol: Clin Pract 2024;14:e200275. doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200275 Background: Seizure action plans (SAPs) provide valuable information for patients to manage seizure emergencies, but are underutilized in adult epilepsy centers. The purpose of this project was to implement a structured SAP for adult patients with epilepsy. Methods: A pre-/post-implementation design was used. Provider SAP utilization rates were analyzed over a 16-week period. A pre- and post-implementation survey assessed participants' perceived impact of the SAP on knowledge and comfort associated with managing seizure emergencies. Provider barriers and facilitators were also assessed. Results: The average provider SAP utilization rate was 51.45%. A total of 204 participants completed the surveys, which showed a significant increase in knowledge and comfort for all items, P  < .001. At post-survey analysis, 98% of participants felt that all patients with epilepsy should have an SAP regardless of seizure burden. Discussion: Implementing a structured SAP increased provider utilization and patient and care partner knowledge and comfort in managing seizure emergencies.

Emergency management of pediatric epileptic seizures in non-hospital settings in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current management of pediatric epileptic seizures in non-hospital settings and the efficacy of early therapeutic intervention with rescue medication in Japan.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was based on an online survey of caregivers of pediatric patients with epilepsy. The survey consisted of questions regarding seizure frequency and symptoms, the use of rescue medication, and emergency medical care. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the time to rescue medication administration and seizure resolution.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 1147 caregivers of pediatric patients with epilepsy. Of the patients described in the study, 98.5 % had been prescribed anti-seizure medication, 95.3 % had more than a few seizures per year, and 90.3 % used rescue medication. The time to seizure resolution was significantly reduced when rescue medication was administered early. Overall, 28.4 % of the patients required emergency transport to hospital, which increased disruption to the lives of caregivers, who returned to their normal activities after an average of 17.2 h.

CONCLUSION

Emergency transport of patients places a significant burden on caregivers. Earlier administration of rescue medications is associated with a reduction in the need for emergency room visits, which reduces the burden on the patient as well as the caregiver.

Global modified Delphi consensus on diagnosis, phenotypes, and treatment of SCN8A-related epilepsy and/or neurodevelopmental disorders

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop consensus for diagnosis/management of SCN8A-related disorders. Utilizing a modified Delphi process, a global cohort of experienced clinicians and caregivers provided input on diagnosis, phenotypes, treatment, and management of SCN8A-related disorders.

METHODS

A Core Panel (13 clinicians, one researcher, six caregivers), divided into three subgroups (diagnosis/phenotypes, treatment, comorbidities/prognosis), performed a literature review and developed questions for the modified Delphi process. Twenty-eight expert clinicians, one researcher, and 13 caregivers from 16 countries participated in the subsequent three survey rounds. We defined consensus as follows: strong consensus, ≥80% fully agree; moderate consensus, ≥80% fully/partially agree, <10% disagree; and modest consensus, 67%-79% fully/partially agree, <10% disagree.

RESULTS

Early diagnosis is important for long-term clinical outcomes in SCN8A-related disorders. There are five phenotypes: three with early seizure onset (severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy [DEE], mild/moderate DEE, self-limited (familial) infantile epilepsy [SeL(F)IE]) and two with later/no seizure onset (neurodevelopmental delay with generalized epilepsy [NDDwGE], NDD without epilepsy [NDDwoE]). Caregivers represented six patients with severe DEE, five mild/moderate DEE, one NDDwGE, and one NDDwoE. Phenotypes vary by age at seizures/developmental delay onset, seizure type, electroencephalographic/magnetic resonance imaging findings, and first-line treatment. Gain of function (GOF) versus loss of function (LOF) is valuable for informing treatment. Sodium channel blockers are optimal first-line treatment for GOF, severe DEE, mild/moderate DEE, and SeL(F)IE; levetiracetam is relatively contraindicated in GOF patients. First-line treatment for NDDwGE is valproate, ethosuximide, or lamotrigine; sodium channel blockers are relatively contraindicated in LOF patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first-ever global consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of SCN8A-related disorders. This consensus will reduce knowledge gaps in disease recognition and inform preferred treatment across this heterogeneous disorder. Consensus of this type allows more clinicians to provide evidence-based care and empowers SCN8A families to advocate for their children.

Evaluation of a Seizure Action Plan in an Adult Epilepsy Center

Background

Seizure action plans (SAPs) provide valuable information for patients to manage seizure emergencies, but are underutilized in adult epilepsy centers. The purpose of this project was to implement a structured SAP for adult patients with epilepsy.

Methods

A pre/postimplementation design was used. Provider SAP utilization rates were analyzed over a 16-week period. A pre and postimplementation survey assessed participant perceived impact of the SAP on knowledge and comfort associated with managing seizure emergencies. Provider barriers and facilitators were also assessed.

Results

Average provider SAP utilization rate was 51.45%. A total of 204 participants completed the surveys, which showed a significant increase in knowledge and comfort for all items, p < 0.001. At postsurvey analysis, 98% of participants felt that all patients with epilepsy should have a SAP regardless of seizure burden.

Discussion

Implementing a structured SAP increased provider utilization and patient and care partner knowledge and comfort of managing seizure emergencies.

Practical Questions About Rescue Medications for Acute Treatment of Seizure Clusters in Children and Adolescents with Epilepsy in the USA: Expanding Treatment Options to Address Unmet Needs

Epilepsy is a common pediatric neurological condition, affecting approximately 470,000 children in the USA and having a prevalence of 0.9% in the global population of approximately 2.6 billion children. Epilepsy is associated with disruptions in several areas of a child's life, including medical burden, quality of life, cognitive outcomes, and higher risk of mortality. Additionally, some pediatric patients may experience acute seizure emergencies such as seizure clusters (also called acute repetitive seizures), which are intermittent increases in seizure activity that differ from the patient's usual seizure pattern and may occur despite daily antiseizure drug administration. Seizure clusters increase a patient's risk for status epilepticus and emergency room visits. Benzodiazepines are the main category of drugs used as acute seizure therapies for seizure clusters. This narrative review provides a practical discussion of care for pediatric patients with epilepsy and seizure clusters exploring such topics as details about the US Food and Drug Administration-approved acute seizure therapies, safety and ease of use of these medications, benefits of seizure action plans to help ensure optimal treatment, and considerations for transitioning a pediatric patient with acute seizure therapy to adult healthcare management.

Written seizure action plans for adult patients with epilepsy: Distilling insights from emergency action plans for other chronic conditions

Seizure emergencies and potential emergencies, ranging from seizure clusters to prolonged seizure and status epilepticus, may affect adults with epilepsy despite stable antiseizure therapy. Seizure action plans (SAPs) are designed for patients and their caregivers/care partners to provide guidance on the individualized treatment plan, including response to potential seizure emergencies and appropriate use of rescue therapy. The use of pediatric SAPs is common (typically required by schools), however, most adults with epilepsy do not have a plan. Patient-centered action plans are integral to care for other chronic conditions and may offer insights applicable to the care of adults with epilepsy. This review analyzes the potential benefits of action plans for medical conditions by exploring their utility in conditions such as asthma, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, and opioid overdose. Evidence across these conditions substantiates the value of action plans for patients, and the benefits of adult SAPs in epilepsy are emerging. Because wide implementation of SAPs has faced barriers, other conditions may provide insights that are relevant to implementing SAPs in epilepsy. Based on these analyses, we propose concrete steps to improve the use of SAPs among adults. A recent consensus statement promoting the use of formal SAPs in epilepsy and advances in rescue therapy delivery methods provides support to engage patients around the value of SAPs. The precedent for use of SAPs for pediatric epilepsy patients serves as the foundation to support increased usage in adults. Seizure action plans in the context of improved clinical outcomes are expected to reduce healthcare utilization, improve patient quality of life, and optimize epilepsy management.