Modifications to gene body methylation do not alter gene expression plasticity in a reef-building coral

A review of environmental epigenetics in aquatic invertebrates

Aquatic ecosystems face significant challenges due to increasing human-induced environmental stressors. Recent studies emphasize the role of epigenetic mechanisms in the stress responses and adaptations of organisms to those stressors. Epigenetics influences gene expression, enabling phenotypic plasticity and transgenerational effects. Therefore, understanding the epigenetic responses of aquatic invertebrates to environmental stressors is imperative for aquatic ecosystem research. In this study, we organize the mechanisms of epigenetics in aquatic invertebrates and explore their roles in the responses of aquatic invertebrates to environmental stressors. Furthermore, we discuss the inheritance of epigenetic changes and their influence across generations in aquatic invertebrates. A comprehensive understanding of epigenetic responses is crucial for long-term ecosystem management and conservation strategies in the face of irreversible climate change in aquatic environments. In this review, we synthesize existing knowledge about environmental epigenetics in aquatic invertebrates to provide insights and suggest directions for future research.

Decrypting Corals: Does Regulatory Evolution Underlie Environmental Specialisation of Coral Cryptic Lineages?

A recent sequencing study has shown that two common Caribbean corals, Montastraea cavernosa and Siderastrea siderea, each consist of four genetically distinct lineages in the Florida Keys. These lineages are specialised to a certain depth and, to a lesser extent, to nearshore or offshore habitats. We hypothesised that the lineages' environmental specialisation is at least in part due to regulatory evolution, which would manifest as the emergence of groups of coregulated genes ('modules') demonstrating lineage-specific responses to different reef environments. Our hypothesis also predicted that genes belonging to such modules would show greater genetic divergence between lineages than other genes. Contrary to these expectations, responses of cryptic lineages to natural environmental variation were essentially the same at the genome-wide gene coexpression network level, with much fewer differences in gene expression between lineages compared to between habitats. Moreover, none of the identified coregulated gene expression modules exhibit elevated genetic divergence between lineages. Possible explanations of these unexpected results range from the leading role of algal symbionts and/or microbiome in adaptation to strong action of spatially varying selection equalising gene expression patterns despite different genetic background. We discuss how future studies could assist in discriminating between these possibilities.

Epigenetic Diversity and the Evolutionary Potential of Wild Populations

Fast-paced selective pressures imposed by climate change and anthropogenic activities call for adaptive evolutionary responses to emerge at ecological timescales. However, the evolution and heritability of genomic variation underlie mechanistic constraints, which dictate a slower pace of adaptation exclusively relying on standing genetic variation and novel mutations. Environmentally responsive epigenetic mechanisms can allow acclimatisation and adaptive phenotypes to arise faster than DNA sequence-based mechanisms alone. Nevertheless, the knowledge gap between identifying epigenetic marks and effectively deeming them functional is still wide in a natural context and often outside the scope of model organisms. With this Special Issue, we aimed to narrow this gap by presenting a compilation of original research articles, reviews and opinions on the topic of epigenetics in wild populations. We contextualised this collection within the overarching topic of conservation biology, as we firmly propose that epigenetic research can significantly enhance the effectiveness of conservation measures. Contributions highlighted the putative role of epigenetic variation in the acclimatisation and adaptive potential of species and populations directly and indirectly affected by climatic shifts and anthropogenic actions. They further exemplified how epigenetic variation can be used as biomarkers for monitoring variations in physiology, phenology and behaviour. Lastly, reviews and perspective articles illustrated the past and present of epigenetic research in wild populations while suggesting future research avenues.

Patterns of methylation and transcriptional plasticity during thermal acclimation in a reef-building coral

Phenotypic plasticity can buffer organisms against short-term environmental fluctuations. For example, previous exposure to increased temperatures can increase thermal tolerance in many species. Prior studies have found that acclimation to higher temperature can influence the magnitude of transcriptional response to subsequent acute thermal stress (hereafter, "transcriptional response modulation"). However, mechanisms mediating this gene expression response and, ultimately, phenotypic plasticity remain largely unknown. Epigenetic modifications are good candidates for modulating transcriptional response, as they broadly correlate with gene expression. Here, we investigate changes in DNA methylation as a possible mechanism controlling shifts in gene expression plasticity and thermal acclimation in the reef-building coral Acropora nana. We find that gene expression response to acute stress is altered in corals acclimated to different temperatures, with many genes exhibiting a dampened response to heat stress in corals pre-conditioned to higher temperatures. At the same time, we observe shifts in methylation during both acclimation (11 days) and acute heat stress (24 h). We observed that the acute heat stress results in shifts in gene-level methylation and elicits an acute transcriptional response in distinct gene sets. Further, acclimation-induced shifts in gene expression plasticity and differential methylation also largely occur in separate sets of genes. Counter to our initial hypothesis no overall correlation between the magnitude of differential methylation and the change in gene expression plasticity. We do find a small but statistically significant overlap in genes exhibiting both dampened expression response and shifts in methylation (14 genes), which could be candidates for further inquiry. Overall, our results suggest transcriptional response modulation occurs independently from methylation changes induced by thermal acclimation.

Modifications to gene body methylation do not alter gene expression plasticity in a reef-building coral

As coral reefs continue to decline due to climate change, the role of coral epigenetics (specifically, gene body methylation, GBM) in coral acclimatization warrants investigation. The evidence is currently conflicting. In diverse animal phyla, the baseline GBM level is associated with gene function: continuously expressed "housekeeping" genes are typically highly methylated, while inducible context-dependent genes have low or no methylation at all. Some authors report an association between GBM and the environment and interpret this observation as evidence of the GBM's role in acclimatization. Yet, others argue that the correlation between GBM change and gene expression change is typically absent or negligible. Here, we used the reef-building coral, Acropora millepora, to test whether environmentally driven changes in GBM are associated with a gene's ability to respond to environmental changes (plasticity) rather than expression level. We analyzed two cases of modified gene expression plasticity observed in a 3-week-long heat acclimatization experiment. The first one was a group of heat-induced genes that failed to revert their expression after the coral was translocated back to the control tank. The second case involved genes that changed the magnitude of their response to the daily temperature fluctuations over the course of the experiment. In both cases, we found negligible or no association with GBM change. We conclude that although both gene expression plasticity and GBM can change during acclimatization, there is no direct association between the two. This adds to the increasing volume of evidence that the function of GBM in invertebrates is unrelated to acclimatization on physiological timescales.