Identification and tracking of Addictovigilance signals in general practice: which interactions between the general practitioners and the French Addictovigilance Network?

ASOS, a national monitoring study to assess narcotic prescriptions and indications in France since 2001

INTRODUCTION

Analgesics are among the most widely used drugs worldwide. The French Addictovigilance Network (FAN) established the antalgiques stupéfiants et ordonnances sécurisées (ASOS [narcotic analgesics and secure prescriptions]) survey in order to assess the dissemination of tamper-resistant prescription forms for narcotic analgesic within the medical community, as well as the nature and evolution of the prescriptions. After outlining the missions of the FAN, this article will describe the population treated with narcotic analgesics in France, their therapeutic indications and how the data have evolved since 2007.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, national, multicentre survey study was conducted that included surveys taken every year from 2007 to 2023 in a national sample of 1500 randomly selected dispensing pharmacies.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients, mostly women (around 60%), remained stable over the study period (63.2years in 2007, 67.6years in 2023). Most prescriptions involved morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl. Morphine and fentanyl were the reference molecules for prescribing opioid analgesics, but the sharp increase in oxycodone prescriptions between 2007 and 2015 impacted their usage. Cancer and rheumatologic pains were the main indications, with an increase in neurological indications in recent years. A focus on fentanyl and oxycodone highlights misuse patterns that are difficult to identify in other surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates how narcotic opioids are prescribed in France, thanks to the active participation of health professionals, and confirms the striking increase in the prescription of oxycodone and the misuse of fentanyl.

Analgesic switching in chronic users of dextropropoxyphene in France

BACKGROUND

The combination dextropropoxyphene/paracetamol (DXP/P) was the most prescribed opioid analgesic until its withdrawal in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated dispensations of analgesics in chronic users of DXP/P during the 18 months following its withdrawal.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study repeated yearly was conducted by using the French reimbursement database from 2006 to 2015. Chronic DXP/P users were defined as patients who received at least 40 boxes of DXP/P in the year prior to withdrawal. Data on analgesic dispensing were analyzed at DXP/P withdrawal (T0) and then every 6 months for 18 months.

RESULTS

A total of 63 671 subjects had a DXP/P reimbursement in the year prior to its discontinuation, of whom 7.1% were identified as chronic users (mean age: 71.5 years, women: 68.7%). Among the patients taking DXP/P alone at T0 (74.6%), one fourth switched to a peripheral analgesic, one fourth to a combination of peripheral analgesic/opioid, one fourth to another opioid, and the others mainly discontinued their treatment (14.1%) or died. During the following 12 months, most of the subjects taking only peripheral analgesics continued this treatment, while half of the subjects with a combination of opioid/peripheral analgesic or taking only an analgesic remained on this type of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Eighteen months after DXP/P withdrawal, more than 10% of patients stopped taking an analgesic. Vigilance is required regarding any change in analgesics by regularly reassessing patients' pain and, in the case of opioid treatments, by monitoring the risk of use disorders.

A 13-Year National Monitoring Study to Assess Narcotic Prescriptions and Indications (2007-2019)

INTRODUCTION

Analgesics are among the most widely used drugs worldwide. This study describes the population treated with narcotic analgesics, their therapeutic indications and how the data have evolved over a decade.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, national, multicentre survey study was conducted that included surveys taken every year from 2007 to 2019 in a national sample of 1500 randomly selected dispensing pharmacies.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients, mostly women (around 60%), remained stable over the study period (63.2 ± 17.1 years in 2007, 68.2 ± 17.2 years in 2019). The proportion of patients treated for more than 3 months increased from 2007 to 2019. Most prescriptions involved morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl (98.5% of all prescriptions in 2019). Morphine prescriptions dropped dramatically from 49.6% (2007) to 32.3% (2019) of the total narcotic analgesics. Fentanyl prescriptions varied from 40.1% in 2007 to 32.2% in 2019. Prescriptions of oxycodone, regardless of the indication, increased steadily from 2007, from 8.3 to 34% in 2019, becoming the most prescribed narcotic analgesic for the first time since the beginning of the survey.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates how narcotic opioids are prescribed, thanks to the active participation of health professionals, and confirms the striking increase in the prescription of oxycodone.

Misuse and dependence of dimenhydrinate: A mixed studies systematic review

BACKGROUND

Dimenhydrinate (DMH) is an antihistamine used to treat nausea and vomiting. Although widely available in pharmacies as an over the counter medication, there have been reports of potential DMH tolerance and dependence and a possible euphoric potential accompanying heavy use (>100 mg/day). Despite the potential for misuse, there is a gap in the literature concerning patterns, characteristics, and potential mechanisms of DMH misuse.

AIMS

This review aimed to synthesize evidence on the pharmacology, clinical effects, and management of DMH misuse and dependence to inform clinical decision making and relevant drug policy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and using Cochrane collaboration methods. We searched seven databases from their inception through July 2019. To be included in the review, studies needed to measure or focus on one or more dimensions of morbidity or mortality related to the misuse of DMH. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies were included in order to capture the breadth of possible studies. Studies were excluded if they did not fit into the conceptual framework of the study of if they focused primarily on the misuse of other substances. A narrative synthesis of study findings was pursued given the limited capacity for a quantitative meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

We identified 24 studies, which described a range of neuropsychiatric sequelae related to DMH consumption, including seizures, psychosis, depression, intoxication (resembling anticholinergic syndrome) and withdrawal. The sedative and euphoric properties, readily available nature, and low cost of DMH appear to facilitate DMH dependence, which were more commonly reported among individuals who had concurrent psychiatric disorders, displaying symptoms such as low motivation, poor concentration, and delirium. The overall quality of studies identified by this review was low-largely because the majority of studies were case reports or review articles, with few intervention or cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence to suggest the existence of DMH-related syndromes involving intoxication, withdrawal, and dependence, more commonly among long-term, heavy DMH consumers. However, higher quality studies are needed to confirm preliminary findings that there may be a biological basis for such syndromes.

Mapping of drug-related problems among older adults conciliating medical and pharmaceutical approaches

PURPOSE

To lay the fundamentals of drug-related problems (DRPs) in older adults, and to organize them according to a logical process conciliating medical and pharmaceutical approaches, to better identify the causes and consequences of DRPs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative overview.

RESULTS

The causes of DRPs may be intentional or unintentional. They lie in poor prescription, poor adherence, medication errors (MEs) and substance use disorders (SUD). Poor prescription encompasses sub-optimal or off-label drug choice; this choice is either intentional or unintentional, often within a polypharmacy context and not taking sufficiently into account the patient's clinical condition. Poor adherence is often the consequence of a complicated administration schedule. This review shows that MEs are not the most frequent causes of DRPs. SUD are little studied in older adults and needs to be more investigated because the use of psychoactive substances among older people is frequent. Prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, patients, and caregivers all play a role in different causes of DRPs. The potential deleterious outcomes of DRPs result from adverse drug reactions and therapeutic failures. These can lead to a negative benefit-risk ratio for a given treatment regimen.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary pharmacotherapy programs show significant clinical impacts in preventing or resolving adverse drug events and, suboptimal responses. New technologies also seem to be interesting solutions to prevent MEs. Better communication between healthcare professionals, patients and their caregivers would ensure greater safety and effectiveness of treatments.

Early Detection of Prescription Drug Abuse Using Doctor Shopping Monitoring From Claims Databases: Illustration From the Experience of the French Addictovigilance Network

Opioid analgesics and maintenance treatments, benzodiazepines and z-drugs, and other sedatives and stimulants are increasingly being abused to induce psychoactive effects or alter the effects of other drugs, eventually leading to dependence. Awareness of prescription drug abuse has been increasing in the last two decades, and organizations such as the International Narcotics Control Board has predicted that, worldwide, prescription drug abuse may exceed the use of illicit drugs. Assessment of prescription drug abuse tackles an issue that is hidden by nature, which therefore requires a specific monitoring. The current best practice is to use multiple detection systems to assess prescription drug abuse by various populations in a timely, sensitive, and specific manner. In the early 2000's, we designed a method to detect and quantify doctor shopping for prescription drugs from the French National Health Data System, which is one of the world's largest claims database, and a first-class data source for pharmacoepidemiological studies. Doctor shopping is a well-known behavior that involves overlapping prescriptions from multiple prescribers for the same drug, to obtain higher doses than those prescribed by each prescriber on an individual basis. In addition, doctor shopping may play an important role in supplying the black market. The paper aims to review how doctor shopping monitoring can improve the early detection of prescription drug abuse within a multidimensional monitoring. The paper provides an in-depth overview of two decades of development and validation of the method as a complementary component of the multidimensional monitoring conducted by the French Addictovigilance Network. The process accounted for the relevant determinants of prescription drug abuse, such as pharmacological data (e.g., formulations and doses), chronological and geographical data (e.g., impact of measures and comparison between regions), and epidemiological and outcome data (e.g., profiles of patients and trajectories of care) for several pharmacological classes (e.g., opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and methylphenidate).

Health consequences of cocaine use in France: data from the French Addictovigilance Network

As the number and severity of complications related to cocaine use reported to the French Addictovigilance Network have increased, the French health authorities requested a national epidemiologic study of the data collected by this network from 2010 to 2016. For this purpose, the spontaneous reports (SRs) linked to cocaine notified by health professionals were analyzed as well as the data from the pharmacoepidemiological surveys OPPIDUM (observation of illegal drugs and misuse of psychotropic medications) and DRAMES (deaths related to the abuse of licit and illicit psychoactive substances). In total, 1 265 SRs were analyzed (510% increase from 2010 to 2016). Users were mainly men (952/1 261; 75%), with a median age of 35.0 years [IQ_25-75 : 28-42]. Cocaine was consumed through the intranasal route by 52% of users (416/797), followed by intravenous administration (32%, 253/797) and inhalation (24%, 190/797). The use of cocaine powder and crack cocaine was reported in 70% (475/674) and 23% (154/674) of SRs, respectively. Cocaine was consumed with other psychoactive substances and alcohol in 47% (603/1265) and 60% (387/649) of cases, respectively. The main cocaine-related complications were psychiatric complications (29%), neurologic complications (24%) and cardiovascular complications (23%). Analysis of the OPPIDUM survey data showed that in 2016, 15.9 and 2.4% of the included subjects consumed cocaine or crack cocaine the week preceding the survey, the highest rate for the 2006-2016 period. The DRAMES survey indicated that cocaine-related deaths increased by threefold from 2014 to 2016. These data confirm that cocaine use in France is worrying with an increase in the number of severe complications and deaths.

The cardiovascular health of prisoners who use cannabis: An exploratory study among hospitalised prisoners

OBJECTIVE

It is essential that health professionals who practice medicine in prison rely on accurate knowledge about their patients to provide them with adapted care. The use of cannabis can influence the health status of prisoners, but data are lacking regarding the potentially related adverse health consequences. The objective of this descriptive study was to describe the cardiovascular outcomes related to cannabis use in prisoners from several detention centres hospitalised in a French hospital.

METHODS

In France, prisoners who require a longer than 48-hour hospitalisation are admitted in specific secured polyvalent units called inter-regional secured hospital units (ISHU). Hospitalisations in the ISHU of Toulouse University Hospital between 2012 and 2016 for cardiovascular disorders potentially related to the use of cannabis were extracted from the French hospital database and analysed using a previously validated methodology. Included patients were those hospitalised for an inaugural cardiovascular event or deterioration of a preexisting cardiovascular illness who declared having used cannabis while imprisoned.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 cardiovascular outcomes were identified in cannabis-using hospitalised prisoners among 411 hospitalisations for cardiovascular disorders (all men, mean age 43±SD years old). All used cannabis (daily: 56%) and tobacco (more than 15 PY: 83.3%), 5 used cocaine, and none used alcohol. The most frequent were coronaropathy (n=13), followed by obliterating arteriopathy of the lower limb (OALL, n=7), arrhythmic cardiomyopathy (n=4), venous thrombosis (n=3), infectious cardiopathy (n=2), and ischemic stroke (n=2).

CONCLUSION

This description of serious cardiovascular outcomes in prisoners who use cannabis provides insights into the clinical features possibly observed in this vulnerable population The findings indicate that 7.5% of hospitalizations of prisoners for cardiovascular disorders are potentially linked to cannabis used in prison.

Ten-year trend of opioid and nonopioid analgesic use in the French adult population

AIMS

Analgesics are the most widely used medicines worldwide. In parallel, opioid abuse has increased and is of major concern. The accessibility of pharmacologically powerful medicines and the addictovigilance signals in France about the risk of opiates addiction call for an overview of analgesic use. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of analgesics reimbursed in France over a 10-year period through its prevalence.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study repeated yearly was conducted by using data from the French reimbursement database from 2006 to 2015. Analgesics were classified according to their pharmacological potency: prevalence of use for each category and sociodemographic characteristics of patients treated were analysed.

RESULTS

The annual prevalence of analgesic use was high and increased during the study period (59.8%, 253 976 users in 2015). In 2015, prevalence was always higher in women and increased with age, except for those older than 84 years. Peripheral analgesics were the most used (55.3%, 234 739 users). The prevalence of weak analgesic use decreased (21.3%, 90 257 users), mainly due to the definitive withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene in France in 2011, which was not offset by an increase in the consumption of other weak analgesics. For strong analgesics (1.2%, 5129 users), morphine was the most widely used, with a dramatic increase in oxycodone use, especially in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of analgesic use is high: approximately 31 million adults had at least 1 analgesic reimbursed in 2015. The most widely used analgesics were peripheral analgesics, far ahead of opioid analgesics.

Addictovigilance contribution during COVID-19 epidemic and lockdown in France

Addictovigilance is a safety monitoring targeted at substances with potential for abuse and dependence. This vigilance was involved during the period of COVID-19 epidemic due to the significant changes in access to drugs and psychological disruption caused by the pandemic and lockdown. This article aims to present the different steps implemented by the French Addictovigilance network in collaboration with the French Health authorities from March to May 2020, including monitoring of potential harmful events, and scientific communication. The first events were identified through the continuity of the networking between the French addictovigilance centres and their partners: community pharmacies, general practitioners, specialized structures and emergency wards. As soon as the lockdown began, first cases of overdoses (lethal or not) were reported with opioids, mainly with methadone, and other opioids (heroin, oxycodone, tramadol or antitussive codeine). Lockdown-related noteworthy events consisted in clinical cases or other relevant information for which lockdown clearly played an important role: among the many substances identified at least once, pregabalin, benzodiazepines, cannabis, cocaine and nitrous oxide were the most significant in terms of prevalence, seriousness or particularly specific to the lockdown context. Despite significant decrease in the activity and travel limited to vital needs, community pharmacies continued to identify falsified prescriptions in this period, highlighting an increase in suspicious requests for pregabalin, codeine and tramadol. In parallel, the French addictovigilance network continued its communications efforts in the period, issuing a newsletter on tramadol, a press release on methadone and naloxone, and participating in the COVID-19 frequently asked questions (FAQs) of the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutic website (https://sfpt-fr.org/covid19). COVID-19 epidemic has been an important challenge for addictovigilance, and has proved that this monitoring is highly essential for alerting health professionals and health authorities to points of vigilance in the field of psychoactive substances.

[Community pharmacists, students in pharmacy, and requests of codeine-based medicines: Observational study]

INTRODUCTION

The case of purple drank motivated a study to investigate the way community pharmacists and students in pharmacy managed, with patients, the abuse risk of non-prescription codeine-based medicines.

METHODS

This prospective descriptive study was conducted, between September and October 2016, within a 170 community pharmacies network of Aquitaine and 437 pharmacy students of Bordeaux university (fourth, fifth and sixth year students, without selection of the pharmacies where they were able to work). It used a common survey questionnaire, which was sent to students through their own "Facebook" (Facebook Inc.) groups.

RESULTS

Pharmacists advised codeine-based medicines in self-medication mostly as a second line pain treatment (96.2%), students also (72.1%). The opinions of pharmacists were almost equally shared concerning their ability to identify dependent patients or to raise the subject of addiction with them (57.7% and 53.8% of positive responses). This seemed to be more difficult for students (57.4% doubted about their ability of identification, 73.8% felt unable to address this issue with patients). Successful experiences concerning help to pharmacodependent patients were rare (11.5% of pharmacist, 4.9% of students). All were involved in patient information on these medicines use. Their opinions about an evolution toward a mandatory prescription status for all codeine-based medicines were almost equally split: 50% of pharmacists were favourable to it, 44.3% of students. They expressed the need for information tools in the care of these patients (46.2% of community pharmacists, 63.9% of students).

CONCLUSION

These results illustrated the interest of pharmacists, and students in pharmacy, toward pharmacodependent patients; they also showed the complexity of this relation. Thus, they could help the elaboration of information tools in the care of these patients, with an adaptation for students who nevertheless presented a good maturity about this question.

[Safety signal detection by the French Addictovigilance Network: Innovative methods of investigation, examples and usefulness for public health]

The French Addictovigilance Network aims to monitor all psychoactive substances with abuse potential including prescription drugs and other legal and illegal substances such as new psychoactive substances (NPS) and its consequences in humans. Created in 1990 through a network of regional addictovigilance centres covering the entire country, these pharmacologists with expertise in addictovigilance have developed interface with different partners (physicians, toxicologists, network of community pharmacies, addictology care centers…) and implemented several original tools of pharmacosurveillance (such as DRAMES [death related to the abuse of medicines] in strong collaboration with toxicologists or such OPPIDUM [observation of illegal products and misuse of psychotropic medications]), complementary to the spontaneous reporting. A such multidimensional approach including proactive surveillance by these tools and also among several heterogenous data sources (such as data from hospitals or claims database) is able to detect early addictovigilance signals and warnings as illustrated with three following examples: cannabis use and acute serious cardiovascular disorders, new synthetic opioids (ocfentanil, carfentanil) and severe opiate overdose or deaths, the diverted use of psychoactive drugs (codeine analgesics or sedative H1 antihistamines called purple drank) by adolescents and young adults. The choice of a broad strategy and the multifaceted system implemented by the French Addictovigilance Network using elements of pharmacology (fundamental, clinical, pharmacoepidemiology) expertise is an innovative method to detect early addictovigilance signals, and to describe its characteristics in order to increase awareness of psychoactive substances by patients, users and health professionals.