1
|
Rodman KC, Bradford JB, Formanack AM, Fulé PZ, Huffman DW, Kolb TE, Miller‐ter Kuile AT, Normandin DP, Ogle K, Pedersen RJ, Schlaepfer DR, Stoddard MT, Waltz AEM. Restoration treatments enhance tree growth and alter climatic constraints during extreme drought. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2025; 35:e3072. [PMID: 39627996 PMCID: PMC11726003 DOI: 10.1002/eap.3072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2025]
Abstract
The frequency and severity of drought events are predicted to increase due to anthropogenic climate change, with cascading effects across forested ecosystems. Management activities such as forest thinning and prescribed burning, which are often intended to mitigate fire hazard and restore ecosystem processes, may also help promote tree resistance to drought. However, it is unclear whether these treatments remain effective during the most severe drought conditions or whether their impacts differ across environmental gradients. We used tree-ring data from a system of replicated, long-term (>20 years) experiments in the southwestern United States to evaluate the effects of forest restoration treatments (i.e., evidence-based thinning and burning) on annual growth rates (i.e., basal area increment; BAI) of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), a broadly distributed and heavily managed species in western North America. The study sites were established at the onset of the most extreme drought event in at least 1200 years and span much of the climatic niche of Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine. Across sites, tree-level BAI increased due to treatment, where trees in treated units grew 133.1% faster than trees in paired, untreated units. Likewise, trees in treated units grew an average of 85.6% faster than their pre-treatment baseline levels (1985 to ca. 2000), despite warm, dry conditions in the post-treatment period (ca. 2000-2018). Variation in the local competitive environment promoted variation in BAI, and larger trees were the fastest-growing individuals, irrespective of treatment. Tree thinning and prescribed fire altered the climatic constraints on growth, decreasing the effects of belowground moisture availability and increasing the effects of atmospheric evaporative demand over multi-year timescales. Our results illustrate that restoration treatments can enhance tree-level growth across sites spanning ponderosa pine's climatic niche, even during recent, extreme drought events. However, shifting climatic constraints, combined with predicted increases in evaporative demand in the southwestern United States, suggest that the beneficial effects of such treatments on tree growth may wane over the upcoming decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle C. Rodman
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - John B. Bradford
- US Geological Survey, Northwest Climate Adaptation Science CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
- US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science CenterFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Alicia M. Formanack
- School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber SystemsNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Peter Z. Fulé
- School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - David W. Huffman
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Thomas E. Kolb
- School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Ana T. Miller‐ter Kuile
- School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber SystemsNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Donald P. Normandin
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Kiona Ogle
- School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber SystemsNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Rory J. Pedersen
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Daniel R. Schlaepfer
- US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science CenterFlagstaffArizonaUSA
- Center for Adaptable Western LandscapesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Michael T. Stoddard
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| | - Amy E. M. Waltz
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizonaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mehryar S, Yazdanpanah V, Tong J. AI and climate resilience governance. iScience 2024; 27:109812. [PMID: 38784017 PMCID: PMC11112607 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
While artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions to address climate change impacts, it also raises many application limitations and challenges. A risk governance perspective is used to analyze the role of AI in supporting decision-making for climate adaptation, spanning risk assessment, policy analysis, and implementation. This comprehensive review combines expert insights and systematic literature review. The study's findings indicate a large emphasis on applying AI to climate "risk assessments," particularly regarding hazard and exposure assessment, but a lack of innovative approaches and tools to evaluate resilience and vulnerability as well as prioritization and implementation process, all of which involve subjective, qualitative, and context-specific elements. Additionally, the study points out challenges such as difficulty of simulating complex long-term changes, and evolving policies and human behavior, reliance on data quality and computational resources, and the need for improved interpretability of results as areas requiring further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Mehryar
- Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Vahid Yazdanpanah
- Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jeffrey Tong
- Intensel – Climate Risk Solutions, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang C, Li S, He HS, Liang Y, Xu W, Wu MM, Wu Z, Huang C, Chen F. Effects of forest management practices on carbon dynamics of China's boreal forests under changing climates. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 335:117497. [PMID: 36812687 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Climate change and forest management practices influence forest productivity and carbon budgets, and understanding their interactions is necessary to develop accurate predictions of carbon dynamics as many countries in the world strive towards carbon neutrality. Here, we developed a model-coupling framework to simulate the carbon dynamics of boreal forests in China. The expected dynamics of forest recovery and change following intense timber harvesting in the recent past and projected carbon dynamics into the future under different climate change scenarios and forest management practices (e.g., restoration, afforestation, tending, and fuel management). We predict that under current management strategies, climate change would lead to increased fire frequency and intensity, eventually shifting these forests from carbon sinks towards being carbon sources. This study suggests that future boreal forest management should be altered to reduce the probability of fire occurrence and carbon losses caused by catastrophic fires through planting deciduous species, mechanical removal, and prescribed fire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Huang
- Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China.
| | - Shun Li
- Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, 330022, PR China.
| | - Hong S He
- School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203 ABNR Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Yu Liang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
| | - Wenru Xu
- School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203 ABNR Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Mia M Wu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
| | - Zhiwei Wu
- Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, 330022, PR China
| | - Cheng Huang
- Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China
| | - Fusheng Chen
- Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A Systematic Review of Applications of Machine Learning Techniques for Wildfire Management Decision Support. INVENTIONS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/inventions7010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Wildfires threaten and kill people, destroy urban and rural property, degrade air quality, ravage forest ecosystems, and contribute to global warming. Wildfire management decision support models are thus important for avoiding or mitigating the effects of these events. In this context, this paper aims at providing a review of recent applications of machine learning methods for wildfire management decision support. The emphasis is on providing a summary of these applications with a classification according to the case study type, machine learning method, case study location, and performance metrics. The review considers documents published in the last four years, using a sample of 135 documents (review articles and research articles). It is concluded that the adoption of machine learning methods may contribute to enhancing support in different fire management phases.
Collapse
|