1
|
Barriers to an effective voucher programme for community-based aged care: a professional perspective. AGEING & SOCIETY 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x22000502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Long-term care for older people is increasingly turning to consumer-directed approaches. As a case in point, the Hong Kong Government recently implemented a new voucher programme for community-based aged care based on a consumer-directed approach: the Community Care Service Voucher for the Elderly (CCSV). The objectives of this study were to explore the lived experience of professional workers vis-à-vis the new programme and to identify barriers to effective voucher use by older people in Hong Kong. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 16 professionals who had primary responsibility for the voucher programme for community-based aged care. The interview guide covered five main areas: (a) professional's perception and experience on the voucher programme; (b) the decision-making process around the voucher programme; (c) personal capacities of older people; (d) family support and social networks; and (e) institutional support. Findings indicate several barriers to effective use of the CCSV including: lack of self-awareness of service needs, lower education level, poor health condition, lack of financial resources, lack of family support, inadequate family involvement in decision-making, lack of peer and professional support, lack of available services and poor service accessibility. Suggestions for strengthening the voucher programme include institution of a case management model and public education. Different factors or elements are required to facilitate older people to make sound and informed choices, and a case manager can assist in combining different resources and forms of support towards effective use of the CCSV.
Collapse
|
2
|
Siette J, Jorgensen ML, Georgiou A, Dodds L, McClean T, Westbrook JI. Quality of life measurement in community-based aged care - understanding variation between clients and between care service providers. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:390. [PMID: 34182935 PMCID: PMC8240205 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring person-centred outcomes and using this information to improve service delivery is a challenge for many care providers. We aimed to identify predictors of QoL among older adults receiving community-based aged care services and examine variation across different community care service outlets. METHODS A retrospective sample of 1141 Australians aged ≥60 years receiving community-based care services from a large service provider within 19 service outlets. Clients' QoL was captured using the ICEpop CAPability Index. QoL scores and predictors of QoL (i.e. sociodemographic, social participation and service use) were extracted from clients' electronic records and examined using multivariable regression. Funnel plots were used to examine variation in risk-adjusted QoL scores across service outlets. RESULTS Mean age was 81.5 years (SD = 8) and 75.5% were women. Clients had a mean QoL score of 0.81 (range 0-1, SD = 0.15). After accounting for other factors, being older (p < 0.01), having lower-level care needs (p < 0.01), receiving services which met needs for assistance with activities of daily living (p < 0.01), and having higher levels of social participation (p < 0.001) were associated with higher QoL scores. Of the 19 service outlets, 21% (n = 4) had lower mean risk-adjusted QoL scores than expected (< 95% control limits) and 16% (n = 3) had higher mean scores than expected. CONCLUSION Using QoL as an indicator to compare care quality may be feasible, with appropriate risk adjustment. Implementing QoL tools allows providers to measure and monitor their performance and service outcomes, as well as identify clients with poor quality of life who may need extra support. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand clinical trial registry number: ACTRN12617001212347 . Registered 18/08/2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Siette
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| | - Mikaela L Jorgensen
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
| | - Laura Dodds
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
| | - Tom McClean
- Uniting, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia
| | - Johanna I Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The regional effect of the consumer directed care model for older people in Australia. Soc Sci Med 2021; 280:114017. [PMID: 34029861 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of Consumer Directed Care (CDC), an internationally recognized means to promote autonomy and choices in the delivery of health in community aged care, is growing, but little is known about the spatial implications of such policy. With differences in the utilisation of home care services across locations, the introduction of a national CDC program may affect different regions to different extents. This paper explores the regional effect of the CDC introduction on older Australians' mental health. We analyse data on 1780 individuals aged 65 years and over, from 11 waves (2007-2017) of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. We find that older adults' mental health is worse after the introduction of the CDC in 2013. Moreover, older adults, who lived in the areas with higher utilisation of Home Care Packages, experienced worse mental stress than the same individuals who lived in the areas with lower utilisation of home care services. This pattern may reflect regional differences in Government funding, community aged care waiting time and provider service fees. Therefore, it is important for health policies that aim to promote choices to older consumers, such as CDC, to consider regional differences in its implementation, to minimise unwarranted variations in the population health and well-being.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bulamu NB, Kaambwa B, Gill L, Lancsar E, Cameron ID, Ratcliffe J. Has consumer-directed care improved the quality of life of older Australians? An exploratory empirical assessment. Australas J Ageing 2021; 40:413-422. [PMID: 33945198 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of a Consumer Directed Care (CDC) model of service delivery on the quality of life of older people receiving home care packages. METHODS Quality of life was assessed using validated instruments. The relationship between quality of life and length of time exposed to CDC was examined using descriptive statistical and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS Consenting older adults (n = 150) in receipt of home care packages participated. Quality of life and capability scores were higher for older people in receipt of a CDC model of service delivery for <12 months compared to those receiving the model of care for longer, although this difference was not statistically significant. However, older people with more recent exposure to CDC indicated a stronger capability to do things that made them feel valued. CONCLUSION Extended longitudinal follow-up is needed to facilitate a detailed examination of the relationship between the evolution of CDC and its longer-term influences on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Bulamu
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Billingsley Kaambwa
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Liz Gill
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cleland J, Hutchinson C, McBain C, Walker R, Milte R, Khadka J, Ratcliffe J. Developing dimensions for a new preference-based quality of life instrument for older people receiving aged care services in the community. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:555-565. [PMID: 32989683 PMCID: PMC7886721 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02649-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the salient quality of life characteristics relevant to older people in receipt of community aged care services in order to develop dimensions for a draft descriptive system for a new preference-based quality of life instrument. METHODS Forty-one in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with older people (65 years and over) receiving community aged care services across three Australian states to explore quality of life characteristics of importance to them. The data were analysed using framework analysis to extract broader themes which were organised into a conceptual framework. The data were then summarised into a thematic chart to develop a framework matrix which was used to interpret and synthesise the data. Care was taken throughout to retain the language that older people had adopted during the interviews to ensure that appropriate language was used when identifying and developing the quality of life dimensions. RESULTS The analysis resulted in the identification of five salient quality of life dimensions: independence, social connections, emotional well-being, mobility, and activities. CONCLUSION This research finds that quality of life for older people accessing aged care services goes beyond health-related quality of life and incorporates broader aspects that transcend health. The findings represent the first stage in a multiphase project working in partnership with older people to develop a new preference-based instrument of quality of life for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in community aged care. In future work, draft items will be developed from these dimensions and tested in face validity interviews before progressing to further psychometric testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Cleland
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Claire Hutchinson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Candice McBain
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ruth Walker
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jyoti Khadka
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Healthy Ageing Research Consortium, Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davey V. Influences of service characteristics and older people's attributes on outcomes from direct payments. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:1. [PMID: 33388045 PMCID: PMC7777219 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01943-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Direct payments (DPs) are cash-payments that eligible individuals can receive to purchase care services by themselves. DPs are central to current social care policy in England, but their advantages remain controversial. This controversy is partly due to their lack of historical visibility: DPs were deployed in stages, bundled with other policy instruments (first individual budgets, then personal budgets), and amidst increasing budgetary constraints. As a result, little unequivocal evidence is available about the effectiveness of DPs as an instrument for older people’s care. This study aims to partially fill that gap using data obtained during an early evaluation of DP’s that took place between 2005 and 07. Methods Semi-structured 81 face-to-face interviews with older people (and their proxies) using DPs are analyzed. DPs contribution to outcomes was measured using a standardized utility scale. Data on individual characteristics (dependency, informal support) and received services (types and amount of services) was also gathered. Multiple regression analyses were performed between measured outcome gains and individual and service characteristics. A Poisson log-functional form was selected to account for the low mean and positive skew of outcome gains. Results Levels of met need compared very favorably to average social care outcomes in the domains of social participation, control over daily living and safety, and user satisfaction was high. Benefit from DPs was particularly affected by the role and function of unpaid care and availability of recruitment support. The freedom to combine funded care packages with self-funded care enhanced the positive impact of the former. The ability to purchase care that deviated from standardized care inputs improved service benefits. Large discrepancies between total care input and that supported through DPs negatively affected outcomes. Conclusions The results offer clarity regarding the benefit derived from receiving DPs. They also clarify contested aspects of the policy such as the influence of unpaid care, types of care received, funding levels and the role of wider support arrangements. Tangible benefits may results from direct payments but those benefits are highly dependent on policy implementation practices. Implementation of DPs should pay special attention to the balance between DP funded care and unpaid care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-020-01943-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Davey
- Research Fellow, Re-FIT Research Group, Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili & Vall d'Hebrón Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. .,Formerly at Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE), London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choice and quality in home-based and community-based aged care: insights from two rapid evidence reviews. AGEING & SOCIETY 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x19001065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAs consumer-directed care programmes become increasingly common in aged care provision, there is a heightened requirement for literature summarising the experience and perspectives of recipients. We conducted rapid evidence reviews on two components of consumer experience of home- and community-based aged care: (a) drivers of choice when looking for a service (Question 1 (Q1)); and (b) perceptions of quality of services (Question 2 (Q2)). We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, and conducted manual (non-systematic) searches of primary and grey literature (e.g. government reports) across CINAHL, Scopus, PsychINFO, and Web of Science, Trove and OpenGrey databases. Articles deemed eligible after abstract/full-text screening subsequently underwent risk-of-bias assessment to ensure their quality. The final included studies (Q1: N = 21; Q2: N = 19) comprised both quantitative and qualitative articles, which highlighted that consumer choices of services are driven by a combination of: desire for flexibility in service provision; optimising mobility; need for personal assistance, security and safety, interaction, and social/leisure activities; and to target and address previously unmet needs. Similarly, consumer perspectives of quality include control and autonomy, interpersonal interactions, flexibility of choice, and safety and affordability. Our reviews suggest that future model development should take into account consumers’ freedom to choose services in a flexible manner, and the value they place on interpersonal relationships and social interaction.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cleland J, Hutchinson C, Khadka J, Milte R, Ratcliffe J. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2019; 17:781-801. [PMID: 31512086 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00512-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Older people (aged 65 years and over) are the fastest growing age cohort in the majority of developed countries, and the proportion of individuals defined as the oldest old (aged 80 years and over) living with physical frailty and cognitive impairment is rising. These population changes put increasing pressure on health and aged care services, thus it is important to assess the cost effectiveness of interventions targeted for older people across health and aged care sectors to identify interventions with the strongest capacity to enhance older peoples' quality of life and provide value for money. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of economic evaluation that typically uses preference-based instruments to measure and value health-related quality of life for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYS) to enable comparisons of the cost effectiveness of different interventions. A variety of generic preference-based instruments have been used to measure older people's quality of life, including the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT); Health Utility Index Mark 2 (HUI2); Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3); Short-Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D); Assessment of Quality of Life-6 dimensions (AQoL-6D); Assessment of Quality of Life-8 dimensions (AQoL-8D); Quality of Wellbeing Scale-Self-Administered (QWB-SA); 15 Dimensions (15D); EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D); and an older person specific preference-based instrument-the Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure for older people (ICECAP-O). This article reviews the development and application of these instruments within the older population and discusses the issues surrounding their use with this population. Areas for further research relating to the development and application of generic preference-based instruments with populations of older people are also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Cleland
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Claire Hutchinson
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Jyoti Khadka
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia
- Healthy Ageing Research Consortium, Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bulamu NB, Kaambwa B, Gill L, Cameron ID, Ratcliffe J. An early investigation of individual budget expenditures in the era of consumer-directed care. Australas J Ageing 2019; 39:e145-e152. [PMID: 31397534 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the key categories of consumer expenditures following the introduction of consumer-directed care (CDC) in the Australian community aged care sector. METHODS Income and expenditure data were extracted from monthly budget statements and categorised. Expenditures by category were examined by home care package level, length of time receiving CDC and socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS A total of 150 older people in receipt of CDC in South Australia and New South Wales were approached, of whom 95 (63%) consented to participate. Hours of formal care support received was a key driver of expenditure. On average, approximately 53% of total expenditure was allocated to care services, 20% to administration and 17% to case management. CONCLUSIONS This study was undertaken during the initial stages of the transition to CDC. Further research should investigate the longer-term budgetary impacts of the transition to CDC for consumers and the sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Bulamu
- Health Economics Unit, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Billingsley Kaambwa
- Health Economics Unit, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Liz Gill
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health Economics Unit, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Proud L, McLoughlin C, Kinghorn P. ICECAP-O, the current state of play: a systematic review of studies reporting the psychometric properties and use of the instrument over the decade since its publication. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:1429-1439. [PMID: 30666550 PMCID: PMC6522451 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02114-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A paper reporting the development of the ICECAP-O was published in 2006. Since then, there has been increasing interest in the use of capability-based measures within health economics and the ICECAP-O has been suggested for use in economic evaluation by decision-making bodies in the Netherlands and UK. METHODS A systematic review of studies published between January 2006 and October 2018 which have assessed the psychometric properties of ICECAP-O or utilised the measure within economic evaluation. RESULTS Twenty-four studies explored the psychometric properties of ICECAP-O and 21 have utilised the measure within economic evaluation; one study reported psychometric properties as well as utilising the measure within economic evaluation. The ICECAP-O has good construct validity and responsiveness, but there is evidence of some issues relating to content validity. In the context of economic evaluation, the ICECAP-O has, to date, mainly been included as a secondary economic measure and the reporting of results is brief with minimal detail and often no discussion. Five of the economic evaluation studies combined scores from ICECAP-O with time, but each used different terminology to describe this result. CONCLUSION Focus, in terms of publications, appears to have shifted now from assessment of psychometric properties to the utilisation of the ICECAP-O within economic evaluation. Further research is needed with respect to a decision-rule for the ICECAP measures. This additional research should also guide users in terms of appropriate analysis, terminology and presentation of results, which are in-keeping with the conceptual framework underpinning the ICECAP-O.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Proud
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Carol McLoughlin
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Philip Kinghorn
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gill L, Bradley SL, Cameron ID, Ratcliffe J. How do clients in Australia experience Consumer Directed Care? BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:148. [PMID: 29940873 PMCID: PMC6019791 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0838-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study explored client experience of Australian Consumer Directed Care. This evolving funding model enables consumer autonomy and choice, allowing older people to remain in their community as they age and need support through the creation of a personalised support service. Consumer Directed Care focuses on providing services that the consumer self-determines to meeting their needs including identifying their types of services, from whom, when and how these services are delivered. METHODS Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in two Australian states between August 2015 and April 2016 with 14 participants, preferably in receipt of CDC services for at least the previous 12 months. Questions explored how the participant first learned about this service; the types of services they received; whether services met their needs; and any additional support services they personally purchased. Interviews were transcribed, coded and thematically analysed. RESULTS Four main themes related to consumer experience emerged. Knowledge: Unsure what Consumer Directed Care Means. Acceptance: Happily taking any prescriptive service that is offered. Compliance: Unhappily acceding to the prescriptive service that is offered. External Influences: Previous aged care service experience, financial position, and cultural differences. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the anticipated outcomes of Consumer Directed Care providing a better service experience were limited by existing client knowledge of these services, how best to utilise their funding allocation, and their acceptance or compliance with what was offered, even if this was not personalised or sufficient. External influences, such as service experience, finances, cultural difference, impacted the way clients managed their allocation. Our study identified that ongoing engagement and discussion with the client is required to ensure that services are specific, directly relevant and effective to achieving a consumer directed care service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Gill
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Sandra L. Bradley
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001 Australia
| | - Ian D. Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Institute for Choice, UniSA Business School, Way Lee Building, Room WL3-65, City West Campus, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|