Effectiveness of acute in-hospital occupational therapy for older patients with hip fracture

Is there a relationship between intensity of occupational therapy and functional outcomes in hospitalised older patients? A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Delivering high-intensity occupational therapy can improve functional outcomes for patients and reduce length of stay. However, there is little published evidence of this in the aged rehabilitation setting. This study aims to explore the association between intensity of occupational therapy interventions and functional outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted with adult inpatients admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation program. The intervention was the intensity of occupational therapy measured as high (≥30 minutes per day) versus low (<30 minutes per day). The primary outcome measured was change in functional performance, defined as a minimum of half a point improvement in the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and/or the Lawton and Brody Scale of Instrumental ADL (IADL) at admission to rehabilitation, discharge and 3months post-discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 693 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 82.2 years (standard deviation [SD] = 7.9), 57% were females, and 64% had cognitive impairment. Patients (n = 210) who received greater than or equal to 30 minutes of occupational therapy daily were more likely to have clinically relevant functional improvements.; for both ADL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-2.83) and IADL (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.96-4.61), after adjusting for age, sex, severity of function (ADL ≤ 2) at admission, frailty and cognitive impairment. Improvements in ADL and IADL were maintained for at least 3 months following discharge.

CONCLUSION

This study found that geriatric rehabilitation inpatients who received higher intensity of occupational therapy interventions were more likely to functionally improve than those who received lower intensity. Further research is required to determine if other factors, such as therapy type, influence functional outcomes.

Economic Effects of Occupational Therapy Services for Adults in Acute and Subacute Care Settings: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Research supports the clinical effectiveness of hospital-based occupational therapy to improve functional outcomes, but no synthesis of economic evaluations of occupational therapy services provided in these settings has been published.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the economic value of occupational therapy services in acute and subacute care settings.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, EconLit, Embase, National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database, PsycINFO, ProQuest (Health and Medicine and Social Science subsets only), OTseeker, and gray literature. Study Selection and Data Collection: Eligible studies used trial-based or modeled economic analyses and included an adult population (ages ≥18 yr) and occupational therapy assessments or interventions provided in acute and subacute care. Two authors independently assessed abstracts and then full text. Articles were then appraised using the Evers Consensus on Health Economic Criteria.

FINDINGS

The authors identified 13,176 unique abstracts and assessed 190 full-text articles for eligibility. Ten studies were included in the systematic review; they varied in their primary objectives, methodology, costs, and outcomes. Studies examined the cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost minimization of a range of occupational therapy services. Five studies suggested that occupational therapy services offer value for money (lower cost, higher benefit); 4 suggested that they offer higher cost and benefits. One study that investigated upper limb rehabilitation did not indicate value for money.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings suggest that occupational therapy for adults poststroke and post-traumatic brain injury, acute discharge planning, and pre- and post-hip replacement is cost-effective, but further research is needed to substantiate these findings. What This Article Adds: The findings provide preliminary evidence of the economic effectiveness of occupational therapy in acute and subacute care.

Experiences and effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions delivered in the acute setting: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to synthesize and integrate the best available evidence on the experiences and effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions delivered in the acute setting.

INTRODUCTION

Occupational therapy is a client-centered health profession promoting health and well-being through occupation. In acute hospital settings, occupational therapy interventions are provided to patients to maximize function, prevent readmission, and promote safe discharge. Recent studies have demonstrated that occupational therapy has modified its practice in acute settings to include advocacy, team facilitation, and rapid clinical reasoning. This review will investigate not only the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, but also the experiences of patients, caregivers, and clinicians in the acute setting.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies on the experiences and effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions delivered in acute settings. For the qualitative component, the experiences of patients and caregivers receiving any occupational therapy intervention, and clinicians directly or indirectly involved in delivering occupational therapy interventions, will be investigated. For the quantitative component, occupational therapy interventions will be compared with non-occupational therapy interventions, no intervention, wait-list, or other inactive or active (usual care) control interventions. Patient outcomes will include impairment, activities of daily living, psychological outcomes, and quality of life, while health system outcomes will include health care utilization and patient flow.

METHODS

The databases to be searched include CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE (Ovid), OT Seeker, PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis and integration will utilize the JBI segregated approach to mixed methods systematic reviews.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020206363.

Does the type of hip fracture affect functional recovery in elderly patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation?

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures should not be considered as a single, homogeneous condition. Various determinants of functional recovery of patients with hip fracture have been proposed, such as age or type of fracture. The aim of this study was to determine if patients with an intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) had lower functional recovery characteristics with respect to those with a femoral neck fracture (FNF).

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out on 531 elderly patients with hip fracture, surgically treated, admitted to a rehabilitation institute between December 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. Patients underwent an individualized rehabilitation program for improving their physical function. The outcome measures of this study were the length of stay (LOS) in the rehabilitation institute, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, i.e. the difference in FIM score between discharge and admission, and the FIM efficiency, which represents the daily gain. Patients were also stratified by age categories and by different levels of functional independence, as evaluated with the FIM total score at baseline.

RESULTS

Age (p<0.05), LOS (p<0.005) and rehabilitation outcomes (FIM score and efficiency; p<0.05) differed significantly between patients with FNF and ITF. In particular, patients with ITF were older and more dependent at baseline. Moreover, they showed a lower FIM efficiency with respect to patients with FNF (p<0.05), which obtained a similar improvement in FIM total score of about 26 points but were discharged on average 3 days before. With aging, FIM efficiency decreased, while LOS increased. Patients highly dependent at baseline (FIM total score <40) had the lowest FIM gain and efficiency and the longest LOS respect to the more independent patients. Moreover, in older (85+ years) and in higher dependent patients the differences in the outcome measures between ITF and FNF were reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of hip fracture could affect the LOS and FIM efficiency of younger and more independent patients with hip fracture during inpatient rehabilitation. In particular, patients with ITF require a longer rehabilitation period to achieve a similar functional gain as those with FNF.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Rehabilitation in Older Patients With Hip Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of hip fractures is increasing worldwide with the aging population, causing a challenge to healthcare systems due to the associated morbidities and high risk of mortality. After hip fractures in frail geriatric patients, existing comorbidities worsen and new complications are prone to occur. Comprehensive rehabilitation is essential for promoting physical function recovery and minimizing complications, which can be achieved through a multidisciplinary approach. Recommendations are required to assist healthcare providers in making decisions on rehabilitation post-surgery. Clinical practice guidelines regarding rehabilitation (physical and occupational therapies) and management of comorbidities/complications in the postoperative phase of hip fractures have not been developed. This guideline aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for various treatment items required for proper recovery after hip fracture surgeries.

METHODS

Reflecting the complex perspectives associated with rehabilitation post-hip surgeries, 15 key questions (KQs) reflecting the complex perspectives associated with post-hip surgery rehabilitation were categorized into four areas: multidisciplinary, rehabilitation, community-care, and comorbidities/complications. Relevant literature from four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was searched for articles published up to February 2020. The evidence level and recommended grade were determined according to the grade of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation method.

RESULTS

A multidisciplinary approach, progressive resistance exercises, and balance training are strongly recommended. Early ambulation, weigh-bearing exercises, activities of daily living training, community-level rehabilitation, management of comorbidities/complication prevention, and nutritional support were also suggested. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the total healthcare cost.

CONCLUSION

This guideline presents comprehensive recommendations for the rehabilitation of adult patients after hip fracture surgery.

Not Just Mortality and Morbidity but Also Function: Opportunities and Challenges for Occupational Therapy in the World Health Organization's Rehabilitation 2030 Initiative

The World Health Organization's (WHO's) new focus on rehabilitation offers great opportunities for occupational therapy. Recognizing that the problems in daily function created by the aging of the world's population and the increasing prevalence of chronic health conditions require rehabilitation to be a vital part of health systems, the World Health Organization brought a variety of stakeholders together in 2017 and 2019 to help them develop the Rehabilitation 2030 initiative. Occupational therapy was represented by the World Federation of Occupational Therapists, the American Journal of Occupational Therapy, the Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, editorial board members of several occupational therapy journals, and other occupational therapy researchers. A major challenge to meeting the goal of sufficient rehabilitation services to meet global need is the worldwide shortage of occupational therapists. This shortage can be attributed to a paucity of knowledge about occupational therapy as a health care profession, lack of understanding of the occupational therapy scope of practice, the cost of education required to become an occupational therapist, and the need for occupational therapy salaries to offset educational costs. Nonetheless, ongoing success in research and clinical outcomes will increase knowledge of the value of occupational therapy and increase the size of the profession. WHO's focus on function is to be lauded. Yet, occupational therapists must not be content with an emphasis on function. They also need to advocate for contextual changes that eliminate barriers to participation and engagement experienced by people with disability.