Kreuth III: European consensus proposals for treatment of haemophilia with coagulation factor concentrates

Predicting joint involvement through tailored prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A, is it possible?

INTRODUCTION

Tailored prophylaxis is the current treatment regimen for patients with severe haemophilia A. Recently, published guidelines describe two possible approaches, based on clinical characteristics or estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters. However, both have strengths and weaknesses, and their characteristics need to be integrated to optimize treatment appropriately. In this paper, we present a model that considers together the characteristics of prophylaxis and the relevance of each.

METHODS

The age at initiation of prophylaxis, number of bleeding events, treatment regimen, therapeutic adherence, FVIII trough levels, and joint status were analyzed in 59 patients followed at La Paz University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2019.

RESULTS

The mean duration of primary prophylaxis of 113.37 ± 57.79 months. Eighty-three percent (n = 49) had no joint status involvement at the end of follow-up (HJHS and HEAD-US = 0). The median ABR was 0.7 (IQR 0.2 -1.0) and 54.2% presented trough levels of FVIII during follow-up >1 IU/dL. 72,9% engaged in some type of physical activity and overall adherence was over 85% in all patients evaluated. The regression analysis performed, considering all these factors, showed that the initiation of prophylaxis before 21 months of age was the most relevant protective factor against the appearance of joint involvement (OR 88.33 p.031 CI 95% 1.49-5224.40) CONCLUSION: Early initiation of prophylaxis was the most relevant factor in the protection of joint status. More comprehensive analysis models adapted to the characteristics of each population, are needed to adequately individualize treatment.

Plasma-derived human factor X concentrate for the treatment of patients with hereditary factor X deficiency

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary factor X (FX) deficiency (HFXD) is an autosomal recessive rare bleeding disorder that leads to defects in the FX protein. Depending on the degree of deficiency, patients may be at risk of life-threatening bleeding episodes. Historical treatments for FX deficiency include prothrombin complex concentrates, which can increase the risk of thrombosis, and fresh frozen plasma, which can cause volume overload and transfusion reactions. Plasma-derived FX (pdFX), a single-factor, high-purity, high-potency human FX treatment, was approved in 2015 in the United States and in 2016 in Europe for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding episodes and perioperative management of patients with HFXD.

METHODS

Five studies that examined the use of pdFX in patients with mild (plasma FX activity [FX:C] ≥5 IU/dL), moderate (FX:C ≥1 and <5 IU/dL), or severe (FX:C < 1 IU/dL) HFXD were reviewed: TEN01, TEN02 and TEN03 were prospective, open-label, multicentre, nonrandomised studies, and TEN05 and TEN06 were multicentre retrospective studies.

RESULTS

When used as an on-demand treatment, pdFX was judged by investigators to be successful in treating 41/42 (97.6%), 2/3 (66.6%) and 79/79 (100%) bleeds in TEN01, TEN02 and TEN05, respectively. When used prophylactically, pdFX was judged 'excellent' for the prevention of bleeds in nine (100%) and eight (100%) patients in TEN02 and TEN05, respectively. Perioperative treatment and pharmacokinetics were also assessed. pdFX was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these studies support the use of pdFX for on-demand treatment of bleeding, routine prophylaxis, and perioperative management of bleeding in patients with HFXD.

Long-term impact of primary prophylaxis on joint status in patients with severe hemophilia A

Background

Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII concentrates is the therapeutic gold standard for severe hemophilia A. Although this approach will change substantially with the use of nonsubstitutive therapies, the long-term effects of primary prophylaxis remain unclear. We present information on joint health with tailored primary prophylaxis in a consecutive series at a single center.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients who did not develop early inhibitors. The annual bleeding rate and annual joint bleeding rate, prophylaxis characteristics, physical activity, adherence, and development of inhibitors were compared between those with and without joint involvement at the end of follow-up. Joint involvement was defined as a Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with an ultrasound score ≥1.

Results

Among 60 patients with median follow-up of 113 ± 6 months after starting prophylaxis, 76.7% had no joint involvement at the end of the follow-up. Those without joint involvement started prophylaxis at a younger median age (1 [IQR 1-1] year vs 3 [IQR 2-4.3] years). They also had lower annual joint bleeding rate (0.0 [IQR 0-0.2] vs 0.2 [IQR 0.1-0.5]), were more often physically active (70% vs 50%), and had lower trough factor VIII levels. Adherence to treatment was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion

Initiation of primary prophylaxis at a younger age was the main factor associated with long-term preservation of joint status in patients with severe hemophilia A.

A review of the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of high‐purity factor X for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary factor X deficiency

Introduction

Hereditary factor X (FX) deficiency (FXD) is a rare autosomal recessive bleeding disorder. Plasma‐derived FX (pdFX) is a high‐purity FX concentrate approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding episodes and for peri‐operative management in patients with hereditary FXD (HFXD).

Aim

To review pharmacokinetic dosing, efficacy, and safety data for pdFX as routine prophylaxis for HFXD.

Methods

Summary of the published pharmacokinetic and safety data from TEN01, TEN02, TEN05, and real‐world publications of pdFX for prophylaxis.

Results

Pharmacokinetic modelling data from the phase 3 TEN01 study supported administration of pdFX 25 IU/kg twice weekly for routine prophylaxis in adolescents/adults (aged ≥12 years). Results from nine paediatric patients in the phase 3 TEN02 study and eight adolescents/adults (aged ≥12 years) in the retrospective data‐collection TEN05 study, along with real‐world evidence, showed that routine prophylaxis with pdFX ≈40 IU/kg twice weekly in patients aged <12 years and pdFX ≈25 IU/kg twice weekly in patients aged ≥12 years was effective in bleeding prevention.

Conclusions

pdFX was well tolerated in clinical studies, with no new safety signals identified during routine prophylactic use. Based on current evidence, it is recommended that routine prophylaxis with pdFX be initiated at 25 IU/kg twice weekly in adults/adolescents ≥12 years of age, and at a dosage of 40 IU/kg twice weekly in children <12 years of age. Thereafter, FX levels should be closely monitored, and dosages should be adjusted according to clinical response and to maintain trough levels ≥5 IU/dl.

The Cost of Von Willebrand Disease in Europe: The CVESS Study

Background

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is one of the most common inherited bleeding disorders, imposing a substantial health impact and financial burden. The Cost of von Willebrand disease in Europe: A Socioeconomic Study (CVESS) characterises the socio-economic cost of VWD across Germany, Spain, Italy, France, and the UK.

Methods

A retrospective, cross-sectional design captured 12 months of patient disease management, collected from August-December 2018, for 974 patients. This enabled estimation of direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs, utilising prevalence estimates to extrapolate to population level.

Results

Total annual direct medical cost (including/excluding von Willebrand factor [VWF]) across all countries was the highest cost (€2 845 510 345/€444 446 023), followed by indirect costs (€367 330 271) and direct non-medical costs (€60 223 234). Differences were seen between countries: the UK had the highest direct medical costs excluding VWF (€159 791 064), Italy the highest direct-non medical (€26 564 496), and Germany the highest indirect cost burden (€197 036 052). Total direct medical costs per adult patient increased across VWD types with Type 1 having the lowest cost (€23 287) and Type 3 having the highest cost (€133 518).

Conclusion

A substantial financial burden arises from the prevalence of VWD for the European healthcare systems considered.

[Congenital factor X deficiency: a retrospective analysis of 11 cases]

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics, laboratory examination, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of hereditary factor Ⅹ (FⅩ) deficiency. Methods: Clinical data of 11 patients with congenital FⅩ deficiency were retrospectively analyzed from July 2009 to February 2021. Results: There were 3 males and 8 females. Median age was 39 (5-55) years. The media duration of follow-up was 81.67 (1.87-142.73) months. Of the 11 patients, 10 had bleeding symptoms, 7 had ecchymosis or hemorrhage after skin bump, 7 had nosebleed, 6 had gingival hemorrhage, and 1 had muscle hematoma. Among the female patients, 6 had menorrhagia and 1 experienced bleeding after vaginal delivery. Family history of FⅩ deficiency was found in one case. Eight patients had a history of surgery, and four had postoperative bleeding. Laboratory findings were characterized by significantly prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and decreased FⅩ activity (FⅩ∶C) . Four cases underwent gene mutation analysis and five new mutations were found. Four cases were treated with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and seven cases with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) . One female patient had significantly reduced menstrual volume after PCC prophylactic therapy. One patient received FFP for prophylactic infusion with no bleeding during and after the operation. Conclusion: Most patients with congenital FⅩ deficiency had bleeding symptoms and there was no significant correlation between severity of bleeding symptoms and FⅩ∶C. Prophylaxis should be applied in patients with severe bleeding tendencies. Gene mutation test is significant for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis prediction of congenital FX deficiency.

Plasma-derived factor X concentrate compassionate use for hereditary factor X deficiency: Long-term safety and efficacy in a retrospective data-collection study

BACKGROUND

Coagadex is a high-purity plasma-derived factor X concentrate (pdFX) developed to treat hereditary factor X deficiency (FXD).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of pdFX administered to patients with hereditary FXD.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients receiving pdFX for compassionate use. Efficacy end points included treatments administered, the number and treatment of bleeds, and investigator assessments. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included: seven received routine prophylaxis, seven received on-demand treatment, and one alternated. Most were aged ≥12 years (n = 13) and had severe hereditary FXD (n = 12). The median follow-up time was 19.2 months (range, 3.5-48.8). The number of infusions per patient per month was higher for the routine prophylaxis group (median [range], 5.4 [1.4-10.1]) than for the on-demand group (0.8 [0.1-2.3]), as was the dose per infusion (27.9 [21.9-53.6] IU/kg vs 20.0 [13.6-27.7] IU/kg). Patients experienced 88 bleeds (34 minor, 7 major, 47 unclassified). The monthly bleed rate per patient was 0.04 in the routine prophylaxis group (based on 17 bleeds in four patients) and 0.8 in the on-demand group (based on 71 bleeds in eight patients). pdFX was used to treat 79 bleeds and was rated effective in all instances. In an overall assessment, investigators rated pdFX as excellent for 14 patients (93.3%) and good for 1 patient (6.3%). No ADRs or safety concerns were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports the use of pdFX as a safe, effective treatment for hereditary FXD. Routine prophylaxis with pdFX may reduce bleed frequency.

Converting factor and nonfactor usage into a single metric to facilitate benchmarking the resources consumed for haemophilia care across jurisdictions and over time

INTRODUCTION

The World Federation of Hemophilia started measuring factor utilization at the country level as IU/capita (International Units of factor concentrates used per country population) in 2001 for its Annual Global Survey. IU/capita have been used to benchmark a country's usage over time and for advocacy. The introduction of a common metric usage spanning across standard half-life (SHL), and extended half-life (EHL) clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) and emicizumab would be a valuable simplification for national healthcare policymaking and industrial production planning.

AIM

Develop and examine a method of converting IU of SHL or EHL, and milligrams of emicizumab into a single metric.

METHODS

We developed conversion factors from manufacturer's recommended dose for prophylaxis with SHL, EHL, and emicizumab as reported on the licensing information for the United States and Europe. We validate the accuracy of these conversion factors against real-world usage data.

RESULTS

The prescribing information in the United States and Europe is marginally different. The SHL/EHL conversion factors are higher when calculated based on the prescribing information than on real-world studies, which are considered more representative of clinical practice. The best estimate of the SHL/EHL conversion factors for FVIII and FIX were 1.04 and 1.87. The conversion factor for emicizumab to SHL is 70 IU/mg.

CONCLUSION

We have generated robust estimates of conversion factors for currently used treatment options for prophylaxis in haemophilia. Usage of a single, harmonized metric will facilitate benchmarking across different countries or longitudinally irrespective of the case-mix of treatment options.

Diagnosis, therapeutic advances, and key recommendations for the management of factor X deficiency

Factor X deficiency is a rare coagulation disorder that can be hereditary or acquired. The typology and severity of the associated bleeding symptoms are highly heterogeneous, adding to the difficulties of diagnosis and management. Evidence-based guidelines and reviews on factor X deficiency are generally limited to publications covering a range of rare bleeding disorders. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on factor X deficiency, focusing on the hereditary form, and discuss the evolution in disease management and the evidence associated with available treatment options. Current recommendations advise clinicians to use single-factor replacement therapy for hereditary disease rather than multifactor therapies such as fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and prothrombin complex concentrates. Consensus in treatment guidelines is still urgently needed to ensure optimal management of patients with factor X deficiency across the spectrum of disease severity.

Kreuth V initiative: European consensus proposals for treatment of hemophilia using standard products, extended half-life coagulation factor concentrates and non-replacement therapies

This report contains the updated consensus recommendations for optimal hemophilia care produced in 2019 by three Working Groups (WG) on behalf of the European Directorate for Quality of Medicines and Healthcare in the frame of the Kreuth V Initiative. WG1 recommended access to prophylaxis for all patients, the achievement of plasma factor trough levels of at least 3-5% when extended half-life factor VIII (FVIII) and FIX products are used, a personalized treatment regimen, and a choice of chromogenic assays for treatment monitoring. It was also emphasized that innovative therapies should be supervised by hemophilia comprehensive care centers. WG2 recommended mandatory collection of postmarketing data to assure the long-term safety and efficacy of new hemophilia therapies, the establishment of national patient registries including the core data recommended by the European Medicines Agency and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, with adequate support under public control, and greater collaboration to facilitate a comprehensive data evaluation throughout Europe. WG3 discussed methodological aspects of hemophilia care in the context of access decisions, particularly for innovative therapies, and recommended that clinical studies should be designed to provide the quality of evidence needed by regulatory authorities, HTA bodies and healthcare providers. The dialogue between all stakeholders in hemophilia care and patient organizations should be fostered to implement these recommendations.

'Do not Do' Recommendations in Hemophilia

BACKGROUND

It is important to discard those practices that do not add value. As a result, several initiatives have emerged. All of them try to improve patient safety and the use of health resources.

PURPOSE

To present a compendium of "do not do recommendations" in the context of hemophilia.

METHODS

A review of the literature and current clinical guidelines has been made, based on the best evidence available to date.

RESULTS

The following 13 recommendations stand out: 1) Do not delay the administration of factor after trauma; 2) do not use fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate; 3) do not use desmopressin in case of hematuria; 4) do not change the product in the first 50 prophylaxis exposures; 5) do not interrupt immunotolerance; 6) do not administer aspirin or NSAIDs; 7) do not administer intramuscular injections; 8) do not do routine radiographs of the joint in case of acute hemarthrosis; 9) Do not apply closed casts for fractures; 10) do not discourage the performance of physical activities; 11) do not deny surgery to a patient with an inhibitor; 12) do not perform instrumental deliveries in fetuses with hemophilia; 13) do not use factor IX (FIX) in patients with hemophilia B with inhibitor and a history of anaphylaxis after administration of FIX.

CONCLUSION

The information mentioned previously can be useful in the management of hemophilia, from different levels of care. As far as we know, this is the first initiative of this type regarding hemophilia.

Plasma-derived Factor X therapy for treatment of intracranial bleeding in a patient with Factor X deficiency: a case report

BACKGROUND

Factor X (FX) deficiency (FXD) is an extremely rare autosomal recessive hereditary hematologic disorder, affecting approximately one in 1,000,000 of the general population.

CASE REPORT

This case report describes an infant with hereditary severe FXD who presented with a spontaneous, life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage and was treated with the first licensed plasma-derived FX (pdFX) concentrate. On admission, laboratory assays showed severe coagulopathy of unknown cause; the patient was empirically treated using a multimodal hemostatic approach with prothrombin complex concentrate, fresh-frozen plasma, and tranexamic acid. Subsequent single-factor coagulation and genetic analyses confirmed the hereditary FXD diagnosis, and the therapeutic regimen was changed to a targeted regimen of 250 IU pdFX daily. Based on careful monitoring of the coagulation profile, pdFX administration frequency was increased to twice daily, followed by a reduction to once every 18 hours. The patient was discharged after 7 weeks of hospitalization in good clinical condition and now receives prophylactic pdFX three times weekly.

Clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety study of a triple-secured fibrinogen concentrate in adults and adolescent patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency

Essentials A novel fibrinogen concentrate was evaluated in patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency. An open-label, phase 2-3 trial studied pharmacology, efficacy, and safety in patients >6 years. The product offers safe and effective therapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding. Data in recovery show the need of adjusted treatment and further investigation in children. SUMMARY: Background Single-factor replacement therapy is considered the most suitable treatment option for hereditary fibrinogen deficiency. A triple-secured plasma-derived human fibrinogen product was developed to increase the safety of the former fibrinogen concentrate. Objectives This non-randomized, open-label, prospective study investigated pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a novel fibrinogen concentrate (FibCLOT® /CLOTTAFACT® LFB, France) in inherited deficiency. Patients/Methods Fourteen patients ≥40 kg received fibrinogen concentrate for pharmacology and 16 ≥ 23 kg received treatment for bleeding or surgery. Each treatment was followed by a 3-week safety observation period. Key outcomes included number of infusions, dose, bleeding control, daily assessment, hemoglobin, blood loss, transfusions, and physicians' global assessment of response. Results Incremental recovery was 2.35 mg mL-1  per mg kg-1 and maximal concentration 1.41 g L-1 (geometric mean) after 0.060 g kg-1 infusion in 14 afibrinogenemic patients. Terminal half-life was 69.3 h (non-compartmental analysis). The maximum clot firmness was increased by a mean of 10.3 mm from baseline to maximal effect. Sixteen patients participated to the efficacy phase: 32 bleeding episodes were treated in 9 patients, and 15 patients underwent 38 surgical/invasive procedures. All patients achieved appropriate hemostasis: response to treatment was successful in all bleeds (95% CI, 0.89-1.00) and procedures (95% CI, 0.91-1.00). Most (94%) bleeds were controlled with a single infusion (median 0.050 g kg-1 ). Two patients experienced asymptomatic distal venous thromboses identified by systematic ultrasound. Conclusion FibCLOT® /CLOTTAFACT® showed a pharmacokinetic profile comparable to that of other fibrinogen concentrates and provides safe and clinically effective substitution therapy for fibrinogen-deficient patients.

Patient-centred value framework for haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Growing budgetary demands have led to increased scrutiny of healthcare spending for rare diseases, leading to a unified goal within the haemophilia community to define objectively patient-centred value in haemophilia care.

AIM

To develop a patient-centred outcomes framework with global applicability for assessing value in haemophilia healthcare.

METHODS

An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to identify the range of patient impacts of haemophilia health care and organize these into a three-tiered, patient-centred outcomes framework based on Porter's model for assessing value.

RESULTS

In addition to measures common to other chronic diseases (eg survival and quality of life), Tier 1, health status achieved or retained, includes haemophilia-specific outcomes of bleeding frequency, musculoskeletal complications and life-threatening bleeds, as well as measures of function or activity. Tier 2, process of recovery, includes such outcomes as time to initial treatment, time to recovery and time missed at education/work; also included are disutility of care, measured by inhibitor development, pathogen transmission/infections, orthopaedic intervention and difficult venous access. Tier 3, sustainability of health, is measured by bleed avoidance, maintenance of productive lives and good health over time; potential long-term negative consequences include insufficient or inappropriate therapy and age-related complications. The applicability of the outcomes framework for different types of haemophilia healthcare interventions is described.

CONCLUSION

Haemophilia health care can affect multiple patient-centred outcomes across diverse patient types and healthcare systems. This framework organizes those outcomes for informing value-based decision making by multiple stakeholders and provides the basis for further refinement and development of a standardized outcomes set.

Use of a High-Purity Factor X Concentrate in Turkish Subjects with Hereditary Factor X Deficiency: Post Hoc Cohort Subanalysis of a Phase 3 Study

Hereditary factor X (FX) deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder more prevalent in countries with high rates of consanguineous marriage. In a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study, 25 IU/kg plasma-derived factor X (pdFX) was administered as on-demand treatment or short-term prophylaxis for 6 months to 2 years. In Turkish subjects (n=6), 60.7% of bleeds were minor. A mean of 1.03 infusions were used to treat each bleed, and mean total dose per bleed was 25.38 IU/kg. Turkish subjects rated pdFX efficacy as excellent or good for all 84 assessable bleeds; investigators judged overall pdFX efficacy to be excellent or good for all subjects. Turkish subjects had 51 adverse events; 96% with known severity were mild/moderate, and 1 (infusion-site pain) was possibly pdFX-related. These results demonstrate that 25 IU/kg pdFX is safe and effective in this Turkish cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00930176).

Congenital Factor Deficiencies in Children: A Report of a Single-Center Experience

Congenital factor deficiencies (CFDs) refer to inherited deficiency of coagulation factors in the blood. A total of 481 patients with CFDs, who were diagnosed and followed at our Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Clinic between 1990 and 2015, were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 481 cases, 134 (27.8%) were hemophilia A, 38 (7.9%) were hemophilia B, 57 (11.8%) were von Willebrand disease (vWD), and 252 (52.3%) were rare bleeding disorders (RBDs). The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis and at the time of the study was 4.1 years (range: 2 months to 20.4 years) and 13.4 years (range: 7 months to 31.3 years), respectively. The median duration of the follow-up time was 6.8 years (range: 2.5 months to 24.8 years). One hundred nineteen (47.2%) of 252 patients with RBDs were asymptomatic, 49 (41.1%) of whom diagnosed by family histories, 65 (54.6%) through preoperative laboratory studies, and 5 (4.2%) after prolonged bleeding during surgeries. Consanguinity rate for the RBDs was 47.2%. Prophylactic treatment was initiated in 80 patients, 58 of whom were hemophilia A, 7 were hemophilia B, 13 were RBDs, and 2 were vWD. Significant advances have been achieved during the past 2 decades in the treatment of patients with CFDs, particularly in patients with hemophilias. The rarity and clinical heterogeneity of RBDs lead to significant diagnostic challenges and improper management. In this regard, multinational collaborative efforts are needed with the hope that can improve the management of patients with RBDs.

Kreuth IV: European consensus proposals for treatment of haemophilia with coagulation factor concentrates

INTRODUCTION

This report summarizes recommendations relating to haemophilia therapy arising from discussions among experts from 36 European countries during the 'Kreuth IV' meeting in May 2016.

AIM

The objective of the meeting was for experts in the field of haemophilia from across Europe to draft resolutions regarding current issues relating to the treatment of haemophilia.

RESULTS

Hospitals providing clinical care for people with haemophilia and related disorders are strongly recommended to seek formal designation as either European Haemophilia Treatment Centres (EHTC) or European Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centres (EHCCC). There should be agreed national protocols or guidelines on management of the ageing patient with haemophilia. The minimum consumption of factor VIII and IX concentrate in any country should be 4 IU and 0.5 IU per capita of general population respectively. Treatment for hepatitis C with direct-acting antiviral agents should be provided to all people with haemophilia on a priority basis. Genotype analysis should be offered to all patients with severe haemophilia. Genetic counselling, when given, should encompass the recommendation that genetic relatives of the affected person be advised to seek genetic counselling. People with inhibitors should have access to bypassing agents, immune tolerance and elective surgery. National or regional tenders for factor concentrates are encouraged. Outcome data including health related quality of life should be collected. Treatment with extended half-life factors should be individualized and protection against bleeding should be improved by increasing trough levels. Steps should be taken to understand and minimize the risk of inhibitor development.

CONCLUSION

It is hoped that these recommendations will help to foster equity of haemophilia care throughout Europe.

Aspects of prophylactic treatment of hemophilia

Retrospective and prospective studies unambiguously show that prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A or B should be started as primary prophylaxis at 1–2 years’ of age and ideally before the first joint bleed. The dose and dose frequency should be individually tailored depending on the goal of treatment, venous access and the bleeding phenotype. The circumstances during the first exposures of factor VIII concentrates in hemophilia A may have an impact on the risk of developing inhibitors. Enhanced half-life products, in particular in hemophilia B, will facilitate treatment in patients with difficult venous access but also in achieving a higher trough level. Evidence accumulate that prophylactic treatment is beneficial also in adults and in patients with inhibitors.