US experience with recombinant factor VIIa for surgery and other invasive procedures in acquired haemophilia: analysis from the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society Registry

Surgery and Prophylaxis with Susoctocog-Alfa in Acquired Hemophilia: Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disease due to autoantibodies directed against clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Treatment of AHA consists of inhibitor eradication with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and prompt control of bleeding obtained with bypassing agents or recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII). The latter has recently been licensed for management of acute bleeding in AHA. Unlike treatment with bypassing agents, rpFVIII can be monitored to provide a successful hemostatic effect and avoid overtreatment. Correlation between rpFVIII inhibitor titers and efficacy of rpFVIII treatment remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

We report three cases of AHA in which rpFVIII was successfully used with an unconventional schedule despite the presence of medium-high titers of the rpFVIII. The modified Nijmegen-Bethesda inhibitor assay (NBA) was used to dose porcine FVIII inhibitors.

RESULT

The presence of rpFVIII inhibitors prior to the exposition to susoctocog-alfa, that may suggest a cross-reactivity with human FVIII inhibitors, did not affect hemostasis.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, rpFVIII demonstrates safety and efficacy in the presence of rpFVIII inhibitors and using an unconventional schedule in both the perioperative and outpatient settings. Laboratory measurement of inhibitors against rpFVIII during treatment is described for the first time.

Current status and future prospects of activated recombinant coagulation factor VIIa, NovoSeven®, in the treatment of haemophilia and rare bleeding disorders

rFVIIa, a human recombinant activated coagulation factor VII, has been used worldwide for more than two decades for the treatment of bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in patients undergoing surgery/invasive procedures with congenital haemophilia A or B with inhibitors (CHwI A or B), acquired haemophilia (AH), congenital factor VII deficiency and Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT), refractory to platelet transfusion. The approved dosage, administration and indication of rFVIIa in the US, Europe and Japan differ, depending on the needs of the patient population and regulatory practices. This review presents an overview of the current status and future prospects, including that from a Japanese perspective, of using rFVIIa in the treatment of approved indications. The efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in the approved indications has been demonstrated in several randomised and observational studies and data from registries. The overall incidence of thrombosis across all approved indications in a retrospective safety assessment of clinical trials and registries, prelicensure studies and postmarketing surveillance studies of rFVIIa use was 0.17%. Specifically, the risk of thrombotic events was 0.11% for CHwI, 1.77% for AH, 0.82% for congenital factor VII deficiency and 0.19% for GT. Emerging non-factor therapies such as emicizumab have changed the treatment landscape of haemophilia A, including preventing bleeding in patients with CHwI. However, rFVIIa will continue to play a significant role in the treatment of such patients, particularly during breakthrough bleeding or surgical procedures.

Non‐factor therapies for bleeding disorders: A primer for the general haematologist

Management of patients with severe bleeding disorders, particularly haemophilia A and B, and to a lesser extent, von Willebrand disease, has come on leaps and bounds over the past decade. Until recently, patients relied upon the administration of factor concentrates to prevent or treat bleeding episodes. Factor administration requires intravenous access and, in up to one‐third of patients, leads to the development of neutralising antibodies, or inhibitors, which are associated with more frequent bleeding episodes and higher morbidity. Novel non‐factor therapies may offer a solution to these unmet needs. In this review, we discuss the factor mimetics, particularly emicizumab, and the rebalancing agents, which inhibit antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and activated protein C, and novel treatments to enhance von Willebrand factor levels. We review the available trial data, unanswered questions and challenges associated with these new treatment modalities. Finally, we provide practical management algorithms to aid the general haematologist when faced with a patient receiving emicizumab who requires surgery or may develop bleeding.

Factor-mimetic and rebalancing therapies in hemophilia A and B: the end of factor concentrates?

Hemophilia A (HA) and B are inherited bleeding disorders caused by a deficiency of factor VIII or factor IX, respectively. The current standard of care is the administration of recombinant or purified factor. However, this treatment strategy still results in a high economic and personal burden to patients, which is further exacerbated by the development of inhibitors—alloantibodies to factor. The treatment landscape is changing, with nonfactor therapeutics playing an increasing role in what we consider to be the standard of care. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of factor VIIIa, is the first such nonfactor therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval and is rapidly changing the paradigm for HA treatment. Other therapies on the horizon seek to target anticoagulant proteins in the coagulation cascade, thus “rebalancing” a hemorrhagic tendency by introducing a thrombotic tendency. This intricate hemostatic balancing act promises great things for patients in need of more treatment options, but are these other therapies going to replace factor therapy? In light of the many challenges facing these therapies, should they be viewed as a replacement of our current standard of care? This review discusses the background, rationale, and potential of nonfactor therapies as well as the anticipated pitfalls and limitations. This is done in the context of a review of our current understanding of the many aspects of the coagulation system.

Forearm compartment syndrome due to acquired hemophilia that required massive blood transfusions after fasciotomy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Acquired hemophilia is rare. In some cases, the bleeding in muscle causes compartment syndrome. However, it is not clear whether fasciotomy should be performed for the compartment syndrome caused by acquired hemophilia because of the risk of bleeding and the unknown functional results.

CASE SUMMARY

A 75-year-old woman was admitted with severe pain of the right forearm with no preceding traumatic event. The right forearm was obviously swollen, and stretch pain was observed. Subcutaneous hematomas were suspected in various parts of the body. Compartment pressure was 110 mmHg on the volar side. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was prolonged to 54.9 s. Fasciotomy was performed, and hematoma was observed in the volar compartment. Postoperative laboratory examinations revealed a low level of factor VIII (FVIII) activity (12.5%) and a high level of FVIII inhibitor (15.2 bethesda units/mL). Acquired hemophilia A was diagnosed. Though recombinant clotting factors were administered, transfusion of red blood cells reached 46 units (140 mL/unit). Hemostasis was achieved 9 d after fasciotomy. The total cost of the clotting factor concentrates administered reached 28834600 yen. With prednisolone, FVIII activity and aPTT recovered gradually. Final function of the hand was good in the index finger and excellent in the others.

CONCLUSION

Fasciotomy resulted in good function of the hand in a case of non-traumatic compartment syndrome caused by acquired hemophilia, but life-threatening bleeding occurred, and the cost of clotting factor treatment was high. Preparation of sufficient blood transfusion, preoperative administration of recombinant activated clotting factor VII, and prompt fasciotomy could be ideal for such cases.

Characteristics of Acquired Inhibitors to Factor VIII and Von Willebrand Factor Secondary to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Experiences From a Chinese Tertiary Medical Center

OBJECTIVE

Because acquired hemophilia (AH) is a rare entity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we aimed to investigate the clinical features of SLE-related AH in Chinese patients.

METHODS

This is a medical records review study carried out at a large tertiary care hospital in China from years 1986 to 2018. We searched the case database in Peking Union Medical College Hospital using the International Classification of Diseases. The clinical data on SLE-related AH patients were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 9282 SLE patients had been hospitalized. Six female SLE-related AH patients were identified. Four patients had acquired hemophilia A (AHA), and 2 patients had acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Their mean age was 33.67 ± 13.77 years. Five patients had active disease. The mean SLE disease activity index measured at the time of diagnosis of AH was 10.50 ± 5.28. The average level of activated partial thromboplastin time was 86.5 seconds. Coexistence of secondary antiphospholipid syndrome and AHA was found in one case, and pulmonary embolism was observed 3 years later. After immunosuppressive therapy and symptomatic treatment, an overall remission rate of 83.3% was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of SLE-related AH was low. The development of AH in SLE patients frequently occurs with active disease. The AH could be the first clinical presentation of SLE. Secondary antiphospholipid syndrome and AHA could appear in the same SLE patient. Early and aggressive treatment contributes to a favorable prognosis.

Recombinant porcine FVIII for bleed treatment in acquired hemophilia A: findings from a single-center, 18-patient cohort

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired autoantibodies to endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) decrease FVIII activity and lead to a bleeding phenotype. A substantial majority of individuals who develop AHA present with severe bleeding. Effective treatment requires both immunosuppressive therapy and prompt hemostatic treatment. Bleeding is commonly treated with bypassing agents (BPAs) such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates Disadvantages to BPAs include the inability to monitor response with standard laboratory assays, inconsistent hemostatic efficacy, and thrombosis. Recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII: Obizur, Baxter, Deerfield, IL) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bleed treatment in AHA in 2014, and has the advantage of laboratory monitoring of FVIII activity levels and known hemostatic efficacy in the presence of anti-human FVIII inhibitors and after failure of BPAs. Using an algorithm-based approach, rpFVIII has been used to successfully treat 18 patients with AHA at our center with substantially lower doses than the current FDA-recommended dosing. Additionally, data from our cohort show that the preexposure anti-porcine Bethesda titer does not reliably predict the clinical response to rpFVIII treatment and is not correlated with the anti-human Bethesda titer. We also present data showing lower total rpFVIII use for initial bleed resolution when rpVIII is used upfront, as compared with use as rescue therapy. We validated our dosing algorithm, which uses much lower than FDA-recommended doses with 14 more patients than in our previously reported patient series.

Gastric ulcer bleeding in acquired hemophilia A patient and persistent inhibitor successfully treated with endoscopic methods of hemostasis

ABSTRACT: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is extremely rare, life-threatening bleeding disorder caused by sudden development of autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII. Invasive procedures in AHA patients with persistent inhibitor, resistant to eradication therapies, pose an extreme threat of life due to uncontrolled bleeding poorly respond to surgical methods of hemostasis and bypassing agents. We report a case of idiopathic AHA 71-year-old patient with persistent high-titer inhibitor (104 BU) resistant to immunosuppressive treatment and immune tolerance induction. The patient was admitted with severe bleeding gastric ulcer complicated by gastric mucosal lacerations (Mallory-Weiss tears). Repeated endoscopic treatment with injection therapy and argon plasma coagulation were applied resulting in bleeding arrest. As bypassing agent recombinant active factor VII (rFVIIa) was applied with an average dose of 91.26 µg/kg (administering cumulatively of 134 doses during 14 days) and the total dose of 855.82 mg. In conclusion, gastric ulcer bleeding in AHA patient with persistent inhibitor can be successfully arrested with the use of endoscopic hemostasis methods and proper doses of rFVIIa.

Acquired hemophilia A that required surgical hemostasis of hematomas occupying oral cavity: a case report

Background

Acquired hemophilia A is a rare coagulopathy caused by inhibitors of blood coagulation factor VIII. Patients with acquired hemophilia A have a higher mortality risk (5–10%) than those with congenital hemophilia. Moreover, there is no established evidence of management recommended for patients with acquired hemophilia A. Previous studies have reported the presence of hematomas in the oral cavities of patients with acquired hemophilia A, which were treated conservatively. Here, we describe the case of a patient with acquired hemophilia A, where emergency surgical hemostasis was required for large intraoral hematomas.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old Japanese man was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of bleeding from large intraoral hematomas. On examination, he could not close his mouth because of the hematomas, which were bleeding spontaneously. Computed tomography angiography revealed no evidence of arteriovenous malformation, and blood test results showed that the activated partial thromboplastin time was elevated beyond the normal limit. To avoid a life-threatening hemorrhage from hematomas, emergency surgical hemostasis was performed with nasotracheal intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Hemostasis was successfully performed, as the hematomas were carefully removed. Moreover, the clinical course was successfully completed using intravenously administered activated prothrombin complex concentrate for hemostasis after operation.

Conclusions

Acquired hemophilia A can cause a life-threatening hemorrhage without predictive factors. Intraoral hematoma may cause airway obstruction. There is no consensus regarding the management of hemorrhage in patients with acquired hemophilia A. As shown here, exophytic hematomas in the oral cavity can be safely removed and nasotracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscopy may be useful in patients with coagulopathy disease.

Perioperative Bypassing Agent Therapy for Pulmonary Pleomorphic Carcinoma with Acquired Hemophilia

A 74-year-old man was admitted with lung cancer, and preoperative blood test showed abnormal activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Coagulation factor screening and APTT mixing test achieved a diagnosis of acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Bypassing agent therapy was indicated and lobectomy was successfully performed without bleeding complications. APTT returned to normal after the operation without any additional treatment for AHA. The pathogenesis of AHA is still unknown and there is no evidence for hemostatic strategy for AHA patients requiring surgery. This study supports the importance of hemostatic therapy and suggests that malignancy might cause AHA.

Perioperative laboratory monitoring in congenital haemophilia patients with inhibitors: a systematic literature review

: Although the use of clotting factor concentrates is the mainstay of haemophilia care, the development of inhibitors complicates disease management. Perioperative management of patients with inhibitors is therefore a challenge. A systematic literature review was performed to identify literature reporting on the perioperative monitoring and management of haemophilia. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from database inception to 26 March 2018. Recent congress proceedings were also searched. Titles and abstracts, then full texts, were screened for relevance by two reviewers. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Of the 2033 individual entries identified, 86 articles met the inclusion criteria. The identified studies were screened again to find articles reporting perioperative laboratory monitoring in patients with congenital haemophilia A or B, resulting in 24 articles undergoing data extraction. Routine perioperative assay monitoring practices were the most commonly reported (n = 20/24); thrombin generation assay was the least commonly reported (n = 2/24). Other monitoring practices described were factor VII and factor VIII coagulation activity (n = 8/24, n = 5/24, respectively), and thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry assessments (n = 3/24). The impact of monitoring on treatment decisions was, however, rarely reported. In conclusion, many methods of perioperative monitoring of haemophilia patients with inhibitors have been identified in this review, yet there is a lack of reporting in larger scale cohort studies. More detailed reporting on the impact of monitoring outcomes on treatment decisions is also needed to share best practice, particularly as new therapeutic agents emerge.

Management of acquired hemophilia A: Review of current evidence

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare acquired bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies against autologous factor VIII (FVIII). It is a disease that most commonly affects the elderly, but it has been described in children and during the post-partum period. It is idiopathic in 50% of cases and is associated with autoimmune disease, malignancy, pregnancy, infection or certain medications in the other 50%. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with an isolated prolonged aPPT without previous personal or familial bleeding history. Treating the bleeding and eradication of the inhibitor is the mainstay of treatment. The first line of treatment for acute bleeding is the use of bypassing agents. The most commonly used method for eradicating the inhibitor is immunosuppression, namely corticosteroids alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide. This review summarises current knowledge and reviews management options and guidelines.

Acquired haemophilia in cancer: A systematic and critical literature review

AIM

There is a paucity of data on the clinical presentation and management of cancer patients with acquired haemophilia (AH), we here report a systematic literature review on acquired haemophilia in the context of cancer.

METHODS

Treatment outcomes of AH were defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or no response (NR), based on inhibitor eradication, coagulation factor VIII levels and bleeding control. Reported deaths were either related to cancer or bleeding.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 cases were collected and analyzed according to classification of cancer and efficacy of treatments for inhibitor and malignancy. The mean age was 68 years for both males (range 37-86 years) and females (range 43-89 years), 39 patients were female subjects and 66 were males. A solid cancer was diagnosed in 60 subjects, while 45 patients suffered a haematological malignancy. Solid cancers affected mainly males; however, the incidence of solid tumours vs haematological malignancies was not statistically significant (P = .09). Not all patients were treated for their underlying cancer, bleeding and/or inhibitor, in two cases outcome is unavailable. CR was reported in 62.1% (64/103) cases, PR in 9.7% (10/103) cases, NR with or without death was reported in 28.1% (29/103) cases.

CONCLUSION

CR was best achieved when successful and complete elimination of autoantibodies occurred contemporaneously with the successful treatment of the underlying malignancy. In some cases, recurrent autoantibodies were harbingers of relapsed cancer. Type of cancer, inhibitor titer, treatments administered for bleeding control and inhibitor eradication did not significantly affect clinical outcome of analyzed cases.

A global quantitative survey of hemostatic assessment in postpartum hemorrhage and experience with associated bleeding disorders

Purpose

Coagulopathy may be a serious complicating or contributing factor to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and should be promptly recognized to ensure proper bleeding management. This study aims to evaluate the approaches of obstetrician-gynecologists worldwide towards assessing massive PPH caused by underlying bleeding disorders.

Methods

A quantitative survey was completed by 302 obstetrician-gynecologists from 6 countries (the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan). The survey included questions on the use of hematologic laboratory studies, interpretation of results, laboratory’s role in coagulation assessments, and experience with bleeding disorders.

Results

Overall, the most common definitions of “massive” PPH were >2,000 mL (39%) and >1,500 mL (34%) blood loss. The most common criteria for rechecking a “stat” complete blood count and for performing coagulation studies were a drop in blood pressure (73%) and ongoing visible bleeding (78%), respectively. Laboratory coagulation (prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time [PT/aPTT]) and factor VIII/IX assays were performed on-site more often than were mixing studies (laboratory coagulation studies, 93%; factor VIII/IX assays, 63%; mixing studies, 22%). Most commonly consulted sources of additional information were colleagues within one’s own specialty (68%) and other specialists (67%). Most respondents had consulted with a hematologist (78%; least, Germany [56%]; greatest, UK [98%]). The most common reason for not consulting was hematologist unavailability (44%). The most commonly reported thresholds for concern with PT and aPTT were 13 to 20 seconds (36%) and 30 to 45 seconds (50%), respectively. Most respondents reported having discovered an underlying bleeding disorder (58%; least, Japan [35%]; greatest, Spain [74%]).

Conclusion

Global survey results highlight similarities and differences between countries in how PPH is assessed and varying levels of obstetrician-gynecologist experience with identification of underlying bleeding disorders and engagement of hematology consultants. Opportunities to improve patient management of PPH associated with bleeding disorders include greater familiarity with interpreting PT/aPTT test results and identification of and consistent consultation with hematologists with relevant expertise.

Hemostatic assessment, treatment strategies, and hematology consultation in massive postpartum hemorrhage: results of a quantitative survey of obstetrician-gynecologists

Objective

To assess potential diagnostic and practice barriers to successful management of massive postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), emphasizing recognition and management of contributing coagulation disorders.

Study design

A quantitative survey was conducted to assess practice patterns of US obstetrician-gynecologists in managing massive PPH, including assessment of coagulation.

Results

Nearly all (98%) of the 50 obstetrician-gynecologists participating in the survey reported having encountered at least one patient with “massive” PPH in the past 5 years. Approximately half (52%) reported having previously discovered an underlying bleeding disorder in a patient with PPH, with disseminated intravascular coagulation (88%, n=23/26) being identified more often than von Willebrand disease (73%, n=19/26). All reported having used methylergonovine and packed red blood cells in managing massive PPH, while 90% reported performing a hysterectomy. A drop in blood pressure and ongoing visible bleeding were the most commonly accepted indications for rechecking a “stat” complete blood count and coagulation studies, respectively, in patients with PPH; however, 4% of respondents reported that they would not routinely order coagulation studies. Forty-two percent reported having never consulted a hematologist for massive PPH.

Conclusion

The survey findings highlight potential areas for improved practice in managing massive PPH, including earlier and more consistent assessment, monitoring of coagulation studies, and consultation with a hematologist.