Prediction of individual factor VIII or IX level for the correction of thrombin generation in haemophilic patients

In patients with hemophilia, a decreased thrombin generation profile is associated with a severe bleeding phenotype

Background

Heterogeneity in clinical bleeding phenotype has been observed in hemophilia patients with similar FVIII or FIX activity levels. Thrombin generation and plasmin generation, as a global hemostasis assay, may contribute to a better prediction of which patients are at an increased risk of bleeding.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to describe the association between clinical bleeding phenotype and thrombin generation and plasmin generation profiles in patients with hemophilia.

Methods

The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay, which simultaneously measures thrombin and plasmin generation, was performed in plasma samples of patients with hemophilia participating in the sixth Hemophilia in the Netherlands study (HiN6). Patients receiving prophylaxis underwent a washout period. A severe clinical bleeding phenotype was defined as a self-reported annual bleeding rate of ≥5, a self-reported annual joint bleeding rate of ≥3, or the use of secondary/tertiary prophylaxis.

Results

In total, 446 patients, with a median age of 44 years, were included in this substudy. Thrombin generation and plasmin generation parameters differed between patients with hemophilia and healthy individuals. The median thrombin peak height was 1.0 nM, 25.9 nM, 47.1 nM, and 143.9 nM in patients with severe, moderate, and mild hemophilia and healthy individuals, respectively. A severe bleeding phenotype was observed in patients with a thrombin peak height of <49% and a thrombin potential of <72% compared to healthy individuals, and was independent of the hemophilia severity. The median thrombin peak height was 0.70% in patients with a severe clinical bleeding phenotype and 30.3% in patients with a mild clinical bleeding phenotype. The median thrombin potentials for these patients were 0.06% and 59.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

A decreased thrombin generation profile is associated with a severe clinical bleeding phenotype in patients with hemophilia. Thrombin generation in combination with bleeding severity may be a better tool to personalize prophylactic replacement therapy irrespective of hemophilia severity.

Thrombin generation and implications for hemophilia therapies: A narrative review

Thrombin plays an essential role in achieving and maintaining effective hemostasis and stable clot formation. In people with hemophilia, deficiency of procoagulant factor (F)VIII or FIX results in insufficient thrombin generation, leading to reduced clot stability and various bleeding manifestations. A correlation has been found between the bleeding phenotype of people with hemophilia and the extent of thrombin generation, with individuals with increased thrombin generation being protected from bleeding and those with lower thrombin generation having increased bleeding tendency. The amount, location, and timing of thrombin generation have been found to affect the formation and stability of the resulting clot. The goal of all therapies for hemophilia is to enhance the generation of thrombin with the aim of restoring effective hemostasis and preventing or controlling bleeding; current treatment approaches rely on either replacing or mimicking the missing procoagulant (ie, FVIII or FIX) or rebalancing hemostasis through lowering natural anticoagulants, such as antithrombin. Global coagulation assays, such as the thrombin generation assay, may help guide the overall management of hemostasis by measuring and monitoring the hemostatic potential of patients and, thus, assessing the efficacy of treatment in people with hemophilia. Nevertheless, standardization of the thrombin generation assay is needed before it can be adopted in routine clinical practice.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

Relationships between coagulation factors and thrombin generation in a general population with arterial and venous disease background

Background

The current study aims to identify the relationships between coagulation factors and plasma thrombin generation in a large population-based study by comparing individuals with a history of arterial or venous thrombosis to cardiovascular healthy individuals.

Methods

This study comprised 502 individuals with a history of arterial disease, 195 with history of venous thrombosis and 1402 cardiovascular healthy individuals (reference group) from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). Calibrated Automated Thrombography was assessed and coagulation factors were measured by means of BCS XP Systems. To assess the biochemical determinants of TG variables, a multiple linear regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex and antithrombotic therapy, was conducted.

Results

The lag time, the time to form the first thrombin, was mainly positively associated with the natural coagulant and anti-coagulant factors in the reference group, i.e. higher factors result in a longer lag time. The same determinants were negative for individuals with a history of arterial or venous thrombosis, with a 10 times higher effect size. Endogenous thrombin potential, or area under the curve, was predominantly positively determined by factor II, VIII, X and IX in all groups. However, the effect sizes of the reported associations were 4 times higher for the arterial and venous disease groups in comparison to the reference group.

Conclusion

This large-scale analysis demonstrated a stronger effect of the coagulant and natural anti-coagulant factors on the thrombin potential in individuals with a history of arterial or venous thrombosis as compared to healthy individuals, which implicates sustained alterations in the plasma coagulome in subjects with a history of thrombotic vascular disease, despite intake of antithrombotic therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-022-00392-0.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.

Clinical use of thrombin generation assays

Determining patient's coagulation profile, i.e. detecting a bleeding tendency or the opposite, a thrombotic risk, is crucial for clinicians in many situations. Routine coagulation assays and even more specialized tests may not allow a relevant characterization of the hemostatic balance. In contrast, thrombin generation assay (TGA) is a global assay allowing the dynamic continuous and simultaneous recording of the combined effects of both thrombin generation and thrombin inactivation. TGA thus reflects the result of procoagulant and anticoagulant activities in blood and plasma. Because of this unique feature, TGA has been widely used in a wide array of settings from both research, clinical and pharmaceutical perspectives. This includes diagnosis, prognosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of inherited and acquired bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In addition, TGA has been shown to provide relevant information for the diagnosis of coagulopathies induced by infectious diseases, comprising also disturbance of the coagulation system in COVID-19, or for the assessment of early recurrence in breast cancer. This review article aims to document most clinical applications of TGA.

Laboratory monitoring of hemophilia A treatments: new challenges

Monitoring factor VIII (FVIII) activity has traditionally been complicated by discrepancies between assays for the various sorts of FVIII molecules. The advent of novel nonfactor therapies (emicizumab, fitusiran, and anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibodies) in hemophilia A poses a new level of difficulty on the laboratory monitoring of these patients. To use the correct assays and for a proper interpretation of their results, it is pertinent to understand the mode of action of these nonfactor agents. Furthermore, the biochemical consequences for the different types of activity assays (whether it be specific FVIII activity assays or global coagulation assays) should be taken into account as well. In this review, these aspects will be discussed. In addition, the use of various animal models to estimate FVIII-equivalence of the nonfactor therapies will be presented.

Use of population PK/PD approach to model the thrombin generation assay: assessment in haemophilia A plasma samples spiked by a TFPI antibody

The thrombin generation (TG) assay is a well-established tool to capture the clotting potential of any healthy or haemophiliac subject. It measures ex vivo the kinetics of thrombin activation throughout the coagulation. Clinical studies allowed to create two databases gathering the coagulation factor levels and the thrombin generation profile of 40 healthy and 40 haemophiliac A (HA) subjects. Besides, portions of all HA samples were spiked with increasing levels of a TFPI antibody (considered as a possible therapeutic target) and corresponding TG profiles were determined. The non-linear mixed-effect (NLME) modelling aims at describing and explaining the experimentally observed important variability of the TG curves between subjects and the individual effects of spiking with a TFPI antibody. The models consist of an empirical description of the TG kinetics, accounting for an additive residual error and between-subject variability on its parameters. Factor VIII and TFPI were found to significantly explain and reduce the variability of the TG of haemophilia A samples. Besides, the model is shown to correctly reproduce the variability in the response to the ex vivo spiking with the TFPI antibody, by combining the empirical description of TG to a simple Hill equation that accounts for the binding between TFPI and different doses of its antibody. Such models can be useful for clinical practice, with the analysis and comparison of the distributions of TG profiles in healthy and haemophilia populations; and also for research, with the analysis of the effect of TFPI and its neutralization on individual TG profiles.

Pharmacodynamic monitoring of factor VIII replacement therapy in hemophilia A: Combining thrombin and plasmin generation

BACKGROUND

Clinical severity of hemophilia A (HA) varies, possibly due to interplay of many factors in the hemostatic pathway. Pharmacokinetic monitoring of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in HA patients consists of measuring FVIII activity levels and subsequent dose adjustment. The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay (NHA) measures thrombin generation (TG) and plasmin generation (PG).

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in TG and PG between HA patients before and during a pharmacokinetic study and identify best parameters to develop a pharmacodynamic model.

METHODS

Twenty-five HA patients (baseline FVIII < 1-9 IU/dL) underwent a pharmacokinetic study with a single dose of 25-50 IU/kg standard half-life FVIII concentrate. At baseline and after administration of FVIII TG and PG parameters were measured with the NHA.

RESULTS

FVIII activity level increased from median 1.0 IU/dL (interquartile range < 1.0-6.0) to 71 IU/dL (62-82) 15 minutes after administration and decreased to 15 IU/dL (10-26) at 24 hours. TG was enhanced simultaneously, with thrombin peak height (TPH) increasing from 22nM (15-35) to 222nM (159-255), and thrombin potential (TP) from 404nM/min (undetectable-876) to 1834nM/min (1546-2353). Twenty-four hours after infusion, TG parameters remained high (TPH 73nM [58.5-126.3]; TP 1394nM/min [1066-1677]) compared to FVIII activity level. PG showed hyperfibrinolysis in severe HA patients compared to mild patients and controls, which normalized after FVIII supplementation.

CONCLUSION

HA patients showed clear differences in baseline TG and PG despite having comparable FVIII activity levels. These results reveal a discrepancy between FVIII activity level and TG, in which the latter may be a better parameter to monitor individualized treatment in HA patients.

Diagnostic Values of Inflammatory and Angiogenic Factors for Acute Joint Bleeding in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

This study was conducted to assess the levels of inflammatory factors and angiogenic factors in patients with severe hemophilia A and evaluate their diagnostic values for acute joint bleeding. This study included a total of 144 patients with severe hemophilia A. Of them, 66 had acute joint bleeding. Ninety healthy volunteers were recruited as control. The levels of leukocytes, monocytes, platelets, hemoglobin, phagocyte migration inhibitory factor (MIF), plasminogen, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, d-dimer, and α2 antifibrinolytic enzyme were measured using hematology analyzer. Thrombomodulin, endostatin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting acute joint bleeding. Compared with healthy volunteers, the levels of leukocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), MIF, and VEGF were significantly (P < .05) elevated in the patients with severe hemophilia A and were significantly higher in patients with joint bleeding than in patients with nonbleeding (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that CRP and VEGF were independent risk factors for acute joint bleeding (P < .05). The area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of CRP for the diagnosis of acute joint bleeding were 0.829, 88.43%, and 67.87%, respectively, and those of VEGF were 0.758, 82.8%, and 68.3%, respectively. The levels of inflammatory factors and angiogenesis factors are elevated in patients with severe hemophilia A and both CRP and VEGF are closely related to acute joint bleeding and may be used as potential biomarkers for predicting acute joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A.