Low adherence to Helicobacter pylori testing in hospitalized patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease

Real-Time Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori Infection by Convolution Neural Network During White-Light Endoscopy: A Prospective, Multicenter Study (With Video)

INTRODUCTION

Convolutional neural network during endoscopy may facilitate evaluation of Helicobacter pylori infection without obtaining gastric biopsies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of a computer-aided decision support system for H. pylori infection (CADSS-HP) based on convolutional neural network under white-light endoscopy.

METHODS

Archived video recordings of upper endoscopy with white-light examinations performed at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (January 2019-September 2020) were used to develop CADSS-HP. Patients receiving endoscopy were prospectively enrolled (August 2021-August 2022) from 3 centers to calculate the diagnostic property. Accuracy of CADSS-HP for H. pylori infection was also compared with endoscopic impression, urea breath test (URT), and histopathology. H. pylori infection was defined by positive test on histopathology and/or URT.

RESULTS

Video recordings of 599 patients who received endoscopy were used to develop CADSS-HP. Subsequently, 456 patients participated in the prospective evaluation including 189 (41.4%) with H. pylori infection. With a threshold of 0.5, CADSS-HP achieved an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.97) with sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% (95% CI 86.4%-94.9%) and 88.8% (95% CI 84.2%-92.2%), respectively. CADSS-HP demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.5% vs 78.3%; mean difference = 13.2%, 95% CI 5.7%-20.7%) and accuracy (89.9% vs 83.8%, mean difference = 6.1%, 95% CI 1.6%-10.7%) compared with endoscopic diagnosis by endoscopists. Sensitivity of CADSS-HP in diagnosing H. pylori was comparable with URT (91.5% vs 95.2%; mean difference = 3.7%, 95% CI -1.8% to 9.4%), better than histopathology (91.5% vs 82.0%; mean difference = 9.5%, 95% CI 2.3%-16.8%).

DISCUSSION

CADSS-HP achieved high sensitivity in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in the real-time test, outperforming endoscopic diagnosis by endoscopists and comparable with URT. Clinicaltrials.gov ; ChiCTR2000030724.

A standardized protocol improves testing rates for Helicobacter Pylori among inpatients with peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Despite a strong link between Helicobacter Pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), rates of testing for H. Pylori in hospitalized patients with PUD remain largely unexplored. We aimed to determine H. Pylori testing practices at our institution among inpatients with PUD, and to implement a protocol to improve testing rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this quality improvement initiative, baseline H. Pylori testing practices were determined by analysis of historical data on 100 subsequent inpatients with PUD from January 2016 to June 2017 at a tertiary care hospital undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Subsequently, a division-wide testing protocol was implemented, and data were analyzed from 43 consecutive inpatients with PUD from October 2019-March 2020 to determine the protocol's effects.

RESULTS

The analysis of baseline testing practices showed a 57% testing rate for H. Pylori. Gastric biopsies were less likely to be performed during EGDs done outside the endoscopy unit (5.9% vs 32.7%, P = 0.001), outside of usual business hours (6.7% vs 24.3%, P = 0.04), and in cases where endoscopic therapy was administered (6% vs 32%, P = 0.02). After implementation of the new division-wide testing protocol, testing rates increased to 93% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Low baseline inpatient testing for H. Pylori represents a missed opportunity to test a substantial number of high-risk patients with PUD. Implementation of a conceptually simple protocol aimed at increasing rates of gastric biopsy significantly improved testing rates in a prospective follow-up. Widespread standardization of H. Pylori testing for inpatients with PUD may improve important patient outcomes related to complicated PUD.

Accuracy of the Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Some studies suggest that the accuracy of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests is decreased in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). We aimed to assess the accuracy of diagnostic tests for H. pylori in patients with PUB in a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) network meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out in seven databases until November 2019. We collected or calculated true and false positive and negative values, and constructed 2×2 diagnostic contingency tables with reference standards including histology, rapid urease test, urea breath test, serology, stool antigen test, culture, and polymerase chain reaction. We ranked the index tests by the superiority indices (SI) and calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity of each test.

DISCUSSION

Our search yielded 40 eligible studies with 27 different diagnostic strategies for H. pylori. In 32 articles, the reference standard was a combination of multiple tests. In 12 studies, the index tests were compared with a single testing method. We analyzed seven networks with the reference standards against a single or a combination of diagnostic index tests. None of the index tests had better diagnostic accuracy (SI between 9.94 and 2.17) compared with the individual index tests as all the confidence intervals included 1. Combined testing strategies had higher sensitivities (0.92-0.62) and lower specificities (0.85-0.46) while single tests proved to have higher specificities (0.83-0.77) and lower sensitivities (0.73-0.42).

CONCLUSION

Use of combined tests may have a rationale in clinical practice due to their higher sensitivities. The differences between the included DTA studies limited the comparison of the testing strategies.

Gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcers and erosions - a prospective observational study (BLUE study)

OBJECTIVES

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a well-recognized complication of peptic ulcers and erosions. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence rate and identify risk factors for this complication in southeastern Norway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2015 and December 2017, a prospective observational study was conducted at two Norwegian hospitals with a total catchment area of approximately 800,000 inhabitants. Information regarding patient characteristics, comorbidities, drug use, H. pylori status and 30-day mortality was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 543 adult patients were included. The incidence was 30/100,000 inhabitants per year. Altogether, 434 (80%) of the study patients used risk medication. Only 46 patients (8.5%) used proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for more than 2 weeks before the bleeding episode. H. pylori testing was performed in 527 (97%) patients, of whom 195 (37%) were H. pylori-positive. The main comorbidity was cardiovascular disease. Gastric and duodenal ulcers were found in 183 (34%) and 275 (51%) patients, respectively. Simultaneous ulcerations at both locations were present in 58 (10%) patients, and 27 (5%) had only erosions. Overall, the 30-day mortality rate was 7.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcers and erosions was found to be lower than previously demonstrated in comparable studies, but the overall mortality rate was unchanged. The consumption of risk medication was high, and only a few patients had used prophylactic PPIs. Concurrent H. pylori infection was present in only one-third of the patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Bleeding Ulcer and Erosions Study 'BLUE Study', ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier. NCT03367897.

Factors Associated With Adherence to Helicobacter pylori Testing During Hospitalization for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines recommend testing patients with peptic ulcer disease for Helicobacter pylori infection. We sought to identify factors associated with adherence to testing for H pylori in patients hospitalized for bleeding ulcers and to evaluate whether performing these tests affect risk for rebleeding.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 830 inpatients who underwent endoscopy from 2011 through 2016 for gastrointestinal bleeding from gastric or duodenal ulcers. We searched electronic medical records for evidence of tests to detect H pylori by biopsy, serologic, or stool antigen analyses. We used multivariable models to identify clinical, demographic, and endoscopic factors associated with testing for H pylori. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine whether H pylori testing altered risk for the composite outcome of rebleeding or death within 1 year of admission.

RESULTS

Among the patients hospitalized for bleeding peptic ulcer disease during the 6-year period, 19% were not tested for H pylori within 60 days of index endoscopy. Hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) was the factor most frequently associated with nonadherence to H pylori testing guidelines (only 66% of patients in the ICU were tested vs 90% of patients not in the ICU; P < .01), even after we adjusted for ulcer severity, coagulation status, extent of blood loss, and additional factors (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.66). Testing for H pylori was associated with a 51% decreased risk of rebleeding or death during the year after admission (adjusted hazard ratio 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of hospitalized patients who underwent endoscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding from gastric or duodenal ulcers, we found admission to the ICU to be associated with failure to test for H pylori infection. Failure to test for H pylori was independently associated with increased risk of rebleeding or death within 1 year of hospital admission. We need strategies to increase testing for H pylori among inpatients with bleeding ulcers.

Predictors and outcomes of delayed plastic biliary stent removal following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

OBJECTIVE

Plastic biliary stents are commonly placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and should be removed or replaced within 3 months to reduce the risk of stent obstruction. The aim of the study was to identify predictors and outcomes of patients who had delayed plastic biliary stent removal following ERCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who received ERCP with plastic biliary stent placement at Loma Linda University Medical Center (10/2004-6/2013) were identified. Delayed removal was defined as presence of stent >3 months after index ERCP. Multivariable regression analysis to identify baseline characteristics associated with delayed removal was performed. Clinical outcomes of stent obstruction (e.g., cholangitis, hospitalization, intensive care) were also collected for those with delayed removal.

RESULTS

Among 374 patients undergoing ERCP with plastic biliary stent, 71 (19%) had delayed stent removal. Patients who had anesthesia assistance (AOR = 3.8, 95%CI 1.2-11.4), non-English primary language (AOR = 3.0, 95%CI 1.5-6.2), and outpatient ERCP (AOR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.1-3.4) had increased while choledocholithiasis (AOR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.99) had lower odds of delayed stent removal. Among those with delayed removal, 13 (18%) were hospitalized for stent obstruction (5 (7%) had cholangitis, 8 (11%) were hospitalized for more than a week, and 3 (4%) required intensive care).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-fifth of patients who underwent ERCP with plastic biliary stent placement had delayed removal with nearly one-fifth of these patients requiring hospitalization for stent obstruction. Targeting patients at risk by improving communication and ease of scheduling an ERCP may reduce preventable adverse events associated with delayed biliary stent removal.

Early Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Vietnamese Patients with Acute Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Prospective Study

Aims. To investigate H. pylori infection rate and evaluate a combined set of tests for H. pylori diagnosis in Vietnamese patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding (PUD). Methods. Consecutive patients with acute PUB were enrolled prospectively. Rapid urease test (RUT) with 3 biopsies was carried out randomly. Patients without RUT or with negative RUT received urea breath test (UBT) and serological and urinary H. pylori antibody tests. H. pylori was considered positive if RUT or any noninvasive test was positive. Patients were divided into group A (RUT plus noninvasive tests) and group B (only noninvasive tests). Results. The overall H. pylori infection rate was 94.2% (161/171). Groups A and B had no differences in demographic characteristics, bleeding severity, endoscopic findings, and proton pump inhibitor use. H. pylori-positive rate in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (98.2% versus 86.7%, p = 0.004). The positive rate of RUT was similar at each biopsy site but significantly increased if RUT results from 2 or 3 sites were combined (p < 0.05). Conclusions. H. pylori infection rate in Vietnamese patients with acute PUB is high. RUT is an excellent test if at least 2 biopsies are taken.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current options and developments

Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a crucial part in the effective management of many gastroduodenal diseases. Several invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests are available for the detection of H. pylori and each test has its usefulness and limitations in different clinical situations. Although none can be considered as a single gold standard in clinical practice, several techniques have been developed to give the more reliable results. Invasive tests are performed via endoscopic biopsy specimens and these tests include histology, culture, rapid urease test as well as molecular methods. Developments of endoscopic equipment also contribute to the real-time diagnosis of H. pylori during endoscopy. Urea breathing test and stool antigen test are most widely used non-invasive tests, whereas serology is useful in screening and epidemiological studies. Molecular methods have been used in variable specimens other than gastric mucosa. More than detection of H. pylori infection, several tests are introduced into the evaluation of virulence factors and antibiotic sensitivity of H. pylori, as well as screening precancerous lesions and gastric cancer. The aim of this article is to review the current options and novel developments of diagnostic tests and their applications in different clinical conditions or for specific purposes.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current options and developments

Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a crucial part in the effective management of many gastroduodenal diseases. Several invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests are available for the detection of H. pylori and each test has its usefulness and limitations in different clinical situations. Although none can be considered as a single gold standard in clinical practice, several techniques have been developed to give the more reliable results. Invasive tests are performed via endoscopic biopsy specimens and these tests include histology, culture, rapid urease test as well as molecular methods. Developments of endoscopic equipment also contribute to the real-time diagnosis of H. pylori during endoscopy. Urea breathing test and stool antigen test are most widely used non-invasive tests, whereas serology is useful in screening and epidemiological studies. Molecular methods have been used in variable specimens other than gastric mucosa. More than detection of H. pylori infection, several tests are introduced into the evaluation of virulence factors and antibiotic sensitivity of H. pylori, as well as screening precancerous lesions and gastric cancer. The aim of this article is to review the current options and novel developments of diagnostic tests and their applications in different clinical conditions or for specific purposes.

Helicobacter pylori and nonmalignant diseases

Peptic ulcer bleeding and recurrence rate are strongly linked to Helicobacter pylori infection even if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play a relevant role in this setting. Further studies confirm that H. pylori eradication lowers the risk of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding. Therefore, a test-and-treat strategy appears to be mandatory for patients with a history of ulcer bleeding and NSAIDs and/or aspirin use. Concerning gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), evidence clearly shows that H. pylori status has no effect on symptoms and treatment. Therefore, H. pylori treatment is not contraindicated in patients with GERD. The exact role of H. pylori in functional dyspepsia (FD) remains controversial. Novel possible mechanisms by which H. pylori may elicit dyspeptic symptoms include alterations of gastric motility, as well as endocrine and acid-secretory abnormalities. Hunger sensations, acid secretion, and gastrointestinal motility are regulated by ghrelin, particularly produced by the gastric enteroendocrine cell compartment. The improvement of symptoms correlates with enhanced plasma ghrelin levels. Apart from the need for more trials on this topic, these findings may give insight into the underlying pathophysiology of FD symptoms. Recent reports suggest that the presence of bacterial DNA in the oral cavity may be relevant to its transmission. A potential protective role of H. pylori on inflammatory bowel diseases needs to be better elucidated.