Rate of unintended Helicobacter pylori eradication in the Vietnamese

Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Previous Helicobacter pylori Infection-Induced Atrophic Gastritis

AIMS

Patients with atrophic gastritis unrelated to autoimmune gastritis (AIG) and without active Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection or previous eradication therapy are considered to have previous Helicobacter pylori infection-induced atrophic gastritis (PHIG). This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of patients with PHIG.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the study period were enrolled in the study. Pepsinogen and gastrin levels, H. pylori serology, and endoscopic atrophic grade were assessed. Patients were divided into five groups based on their H. pylori status and disease history (PHIG, without H. pylori infection, with active H. pylori infection, with successful H. pylori eradication, and AIG). Their gastric cancer risk status was classified according to the ABC method of serological gastric cancer screening.

RESULTS

Of 536 consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the study period, 318 were included (31 with PHIG, 77 without H. pylori infection, 101 with active H. pylori infection, 80 with successful H. pylori eradication, and 29 with AIG). Of the 31 patients with PHIG, 21 (68%) were H. pylori-seronegative, and 20 (65%) were classified as group A (normal pepsinogen, H. pylori-seronegative). Patients with PHIG accounted for 90.1% of the patients at high risk for gastric cancer misclassified as group A. The pepsinogen and H. pylori serological profiles of patients with PHIG were similar to those of patients with successful H. pylori eradication more than six years previously. A receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis that included 13 patients with AIG and without active H. pylori infection and no previous eradication therapy and 31 patients with PHIG revealed that an endoscopic atrophy grade of O-III or greater according to the Kimura-Takemoto classification can predict AIG.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of the patients with PHIG were misclassified as being at low risk (group A) according to the ABC method, suggesting that endoscopy is necessary for group A patients. The results of the serological evaluation of PHIG indicated that patients with PHIG may have experienced spontaneous H. pylori eradication, possibly because of the use of antibiotics for other conditions. Autoimmune gastritis should be considered in the presence of grade 0-III or greater gastric mucosal atrophy in patients with suspected PHIG, even if the autoantibody and histological findings are not available.

Vietnam Association of Gastroenterology (VNAGE) consensus on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is prevalent and has a rapidly increasing antibiotic resistance rate in Vietnam. Reinfection is quite common, and gastric carcinoma remains one of the most common malignancies, which is not uncommon to develop after successful eradication. The purpose of this consensus is to provide updated recommendations on the management of H. pylori infection in the country. The consensus panel consisted of 32 experts from 14 major universities and institutions in Vietnam who were invited to review the evidence and develop the statements using the Delphi method. The process followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The consensus level was defined as ≥80% for agreement on the proposed statements. Due to the limited availability of high-quality local evidence, this consensus was also based on high-quality evidence from international studies, especially those conducted in other populations in the Asia-Pacific region. The panel finally reached a consensus on 27 statements after two voting rounds, which consisted of four sections (1) indications for testing and selection of diagnostic tests (2), treatment regimens, (3) post-treatment confirmation of H. pylori status, and (4) reinfection prevention methods and follow-up after eradication. Important issues that require further evidence include studies on third-line regimens, strategies to prevent H. pylori reinfection, and post-eradication follow-up for precancerous gastric lesions. We hope this consensus will help guide the current clinical practice in Vietnam and promote multicenter studies in the country and international collaborations.

Diagnostic Accuracy of H. pylori Status by Conventional Endoscopy: Time-Trend Change After Eradication and Impact of Endoscopic Image Quality

AIM

To assess the time trend of diagnostic accuracy of pre- and post-eradication H. pylori status and interobserver agreement of gastric atrophy grading.

METHODS

A series 100 of conventional endoscopic image sets taken from subjects undergoing gastric cancer screening at a polyclinic were evaluated by 5 experienced assessors. Each assessor independently examined endoscopic findings according to the Kyoto classification and then determined the H. pylori status (never, current, or past infected). Gastric atrophy was assessed according to the Kimura-Takemoto classification and classified into 3 grades (none/mild, moderate, or severe). The image series that ≥3 assessors considered to have good quality were arbitrarily defined as high-quality image (HQI) series, and the rest were defined as low-quality image (LQI) series.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic accuracy of H. pylori status was 83.0%. It was lowest in subjects with current infection (54%), gradually increased at 1 year (79%, P < 0.001) and 3 years (94.0%, P = 0.002), but then did not significantly change at 5 years (91.0%, P = 0.420) after eradication. The rate of LQI series was 28%. The overall diagnostic accuracy of H. pylori status dropped from 88.9% to 67.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean kappa value on gastric atrophy grading dropped from 0.730 to 0.580 (P = 0.002) in the HQI and LQI series, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy of H. pylori status increased over time after eradication. LQI series badly affected the diagnostic accuracy of H. pylori status and the level of agreement when grading gastric atrophy.

Serum Anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG Antibody Titer in H. pylori-negative Cases with a Different Gastric Mucosal Atrophy Status

Objective This retrospective study was performed to investigate the anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody serum titers in H. pylori-negative subjects with different degrees of gastric mucosal atrophy including C0 grade atrophy. Methods The absence of H. pylori infection was determined based on both negative serum anti-H. pylori IgG antibody test findings and no endoscopic evidence of that infection. Cases negative for the antibody and with positive endoscopic findings of H. pylori infection were defined as H. pylori-positive. The serum anti-H. pylori IgG antibody titers were analyzed in H. pylori-negative (n=1,087), -positive (n=69), and post-eradicated (n=278) subjects. Results The serum antibody titer in subjects with H. pylori-positive endoscopy findings was significantly higher than that in H. pylori-negative subjects, even when the serum titer indicated a negative result. In addition, the anti-H. pylori IgG antibody serum titer was higher in H. pylori-negative subjects with a greater degree of gastric mucosal atrophy. In a comparison between H. pylori-negative C0 and C1 gastric mucosal atrophy cases, the antibody serum titer in those classified as C0 was significantly lower. An analysis of H. pylori post-eradicated cases showed that the serum antibody titer decreased over time after successful eradication. Conclusion The disappearance of H. pylori infection in H. pylori-negative individuals may occur later in those with a greater degree of gastric mucosal atrophy. The serum antibody titer difference between the H. pylori-negative C0 and C1 groups might have been caused by the differences in distribution between H. pylori-uninfected subjects and those in whom the infection had disappeared, thus additional investigation is needed to clarify the significance of gastric mucosal classification including the C0 grade.

Previous Helicobacter pylori infection-induced atrophic gastritis: A distinct disease entity in an understudied population without a history of eradication

Individuals with chronic atrophic gastritis who are negative for active H. pylori infection with no history of eradication therapy have been identified in clinical practice. By excluding false-negative and autoimmune gastritis cases, it can be surmised that most of these patients have experienced unintentional eradication of H. pylori after antibiotic treatment for other infectious disease, unreported successful eradication, or H. pylori that spontaneously disappeared. These patients are considered to have previous H. pylori infection-induced atrophic gastritis. In this work, we define these cases based on the following criteria: absence of previous H. pylori eradication; atrophic changes on endoscopy or histologic confirmation of glandular atrophy; negative for a current H. pylori infection diagnosed in the absence of proton-pump inhibitors or antibiotics; and absence of localized corpus atrophy, positivity for autoantibodies, or characteristic histologic findings suggestive of autoimmune gastritis. The risk of developing gastric cancer depends on the atrophic grade. The reported rate of developing gastric cancer is 0.31%-0.62% per year for successfully eradicated severely atrophic cases (pathophysiologically equal to unintentionally eradicated cases and unreported eradicated cases), and 0.53%-0.87% per year for spontaneously resolved cases due to severe atrophy. Therefore, for previous H. pylori infection-induced atrophic gastritis cases, we recommend endoscopic surveillance every 3 years for high-risk patients, including those with endoscopically severe atrophy or intestinal metaplasia. Because of the difficulty involved in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer in cases of previous infection, appropriate monitoring of the high-risk subgroup of this understudied population is especially important.

Helicobacter pylori Infection and Related Gastrointestinal Diseases in Southeast Asian Countries: An Expert Opinion Survey

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is currently considered as an infectious disease irrespective of symptoms and stage of disease. This study aimed to survey the impact of H. pylori infection and the current management approaches in Southeast Asian countries. Materials and methods: This is a survey among 26 experts from 9 Southeast Asian countries (Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam), who attended a meeting to develop the ASEAN consensus on H. pylori management in November 2015. Results: The prevalence of H. pylori varied significantly from 20% to 69% among countries, highest in Myanmar and lowest in Malaysia. The rate of H. pylori infection in patients with gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer (GC) also varied significantly, not only among countries but also among regions within the same country. The most common method for H. pylori diagnosis before treatment was rapid urease test, followed by urea breath test. In multi-ethnic countries, some ethnic groups including Chinese, Batak and Minahasanese were considered as having higher risk of GC. There have been no national screening programs for GC in all countries, and a majority of patients with GC were diagnosed in advanced stages with very poor 5-year survival. Conclusions: The prevalence of H. pylori infection and its infection rates in related gastrointestinal diseases were significantly different among Southeast Asian countries. The prognosis of patients with GC in the region was very poor. The result of this survey is a platform for future international and regional research collaboration.

Cutoff Pepsinogen Level for Predicting Unintendedly Eradicated Cases of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Subjects with Seemingly Normal Pepsinogen Levels

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

In the ABC method, which is a method for risk stratification of gastric cancer using serum anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen (PG) test, subjects with normal PG and seronegative for H. pylori are named as "Group A" and are regarded as having a low risk of gastric cancer. These "Group A" subjects include unintentionally eradicated cases at relatively high risk, and this study aimed to identify these subjects.

METHODS

Of the 109 subjects, 76 were classified as uninfected Group A subjects with negative histologic H. pylori infection and no histologic and endoscopic atrophy, and 33 subjects were classified serologically as Group A after successful eradication, which are serologically equal to the unintendedly eradicated cases in Group A. The usefulness of measuring PG levels to detect post-eradication cases was validated by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve for PGI level was 0.736 ± 0.06 (p < 0.01; cutoff value, 37.0 ng/mL; sensitivity, 77.6%; specificity, 72.7%), and that for the PGI/II ratio was 0.660 ± 0.06 (p < 0.01; cutoff value, 5.1; sensitivity, 84.2%; specificity, 43.4%).

CONCLUSION

PGI levels of ≤37 ng/mL and PGI/II ratios of ≤5.1 effectively identified unintendedly eradicated cases in Group A.

Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer: advanced-stage undifferentiated adenocarcinoma located in the pyloric gland area

The incidence of Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer (HpNGC) is extremely low. A 78-year old female without H. pylori infection was diagnosed with type 4 advanced-stage gastric prepylorus cancer. Distal gastrectomy was performed as for HpNGC (cT3N0M0). Histological findings of the resected specimen showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma, which were located in the pyloric gland area, diffusely invaded beyond the serosa without lymph node metastasis (pT4aN0M0). Most cases of undifferentiated-type HpNGC are diagnosed in the early stage and are located in the fundic gland area. We report the first case of advanced-stage undifferentiated HpNGC located in the pyloric gland area.