Efficacy of bismuth for antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Modified Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding bismuth to conventional triple therapy (modified bismuth quadruple therapy [mBQT]) for Helicobacter pylori treatment-naïve patients in an era of increasing eradication failure. We performed a comprehensive literature search up to December 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to investigate mBQT's benefits. The comparative treatments were as follows: (1) triple therapy without bismuth (TT), (2) non-BQTs (sequential and concomitant), and (3) classic BQT (cBQT) containing metronidazole and tetracycline. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed to compare eradication rates, adverse drug events, and patient compliance between the mBQT and comparison groups. In total, 9162 and 8449 patients from 43 trials in 35 RCTs were included in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. The mBQT group had a superior pooled eradication rate compared to the TT group (84.8% vs. 74.1%, p < 0.00001, and odds ratio [OR] = 2.02 [1.61-2.55]). The mBQT showed a similar eradication rate to the non-BQT and cBQT groups (80.8% vs. 80.2%, p = 0.55, and OR = 1.09 [0.83-1.43] in the non-BQT group; 81.5% vs. 83.0%, p = 0.36, and OR = 0.84 [0.59-1.21] in the cBQT group). Regarding adverse drug events, there was no significant difference between the mBQT and comparison groups (25.4% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.53, and OR = 0.95 [0.80-1.12]). The subgroup analysis showed that patient adherence to mBQT was significantly higher than to cBQT (96.4% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.004, and OR = 1.83 [1.21-2.77]). Our meta-analysis showed that mBQT was an effective and tolerable first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication.

Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Guided Eradication Therapy in the Southeast Region of China: A Retrospective Study

Background and Aim

Antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori is increasing worldwide, lowering its efficacy in eradication therapy and posing a serious threat to human health. This study evaluated H. pylori resistance to antibiotics in the southeast region of China and explored factors related to eradication failure guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients who tested positive underwent gastroscopy, and H. pylori infection was confirmed by histological staining and H. pylori culture. We determined the rate of H. pylori antibiotic resistance, success rate of AST-guided eradication therapy, and risk factors associated with treatment failure.

Results

Among the 210 enrolled patients, 188 (89.5%) had successful cultures, and 183 (87.1%) underwent AST. The most common antibiotic resistance was to metronidazole and clarithromycin (89.6%), followed by levofloxacin (68.3%), and amoxicillin (14.2%). Furazolidone (3.0%) and tetracycline (0.5%) showed relatively low resistance rates. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of resistance to MET, LEV, or AMX between naive and non-naive patients. However, CLA resistance rates in non-naive patients were significantly higher than those in naive patients. The overall success rate of AST-guided therapy was high and showed no significant difference between first-line and rescue therapy. Sex, age, prior therapy, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) use were not significantly associated with an increased risk of eradication failure in AST-guided therapy.

Helicobacter pylori Management in Africa: A Survey of Diagnostic, Treatment, and Related Resources

BACKGROUND

Although Helicobacter pylori infection (H. pylori) prevalence in Africa has declined in the last decade, it remains concerningly high. H. pylori is asymptomatic in the majority of patients but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in 10%-20%.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an online survey of 21 African countries, with the link distributed to members of the African Helicobacter Microbiota Study Group. The survey was completed by 562 respondents; the majority were from Nigeria (27.2%), South Africa (18.1%), Tanzania (17.6%), Egypt (16.9%), and Cameroon (14.2%).

RESULTS

The most common reason for H. pylori testing was dyspepsia in 83.9% of the cases. Abnormal findings at gastroscopy (62.3%) and heartburn (61.7%) were also common indications. Stool antigen testing and histological examination of gastric biopsies using Giemsa were the two most used methods for H. pylori testing at 62.3% and 50.3%, respectively. Most respondents reported the use of standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy as first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSION

This survey has demonstrated the diversity of practice and resource availability within the African continent. Several international guidelines exist on the management of H. pylori, but little data is available in Africa on how this condition is managed in every day clinical practice. There is an urgent need to formulate evidence-based and locally relevant practice guidelines on the African continent. In this context, the African Helicobacter and Microbiota study group was formed to coordinate efforts across the continent on H. pylori research to provide guidance on its management. This paper, therefore, aimed to evaluate the practice of H. pylori diagnostics and management, as well as related resources in representative countries in Africa, to facilitate the development of such guidelines.

Modern approaches to the eradication of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>: a spectrum of perspectives

Helicobacter pylori is one of the most widespread infections, affecting approximately 50% of the global population, with the Russian Federation ranking among the regions with a relatively high prevalence. Eradication therapy remains the primary strategy, not only for the treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal diseases but also for reducing the risk of stomach cancer, highlighting the medical and social impact of this infection. A key factor contributing to the reduced effectiveness of eradication therapy is the microorganism’s primary or secondary resistance to antibacterial drugs, a problem recognized worldwide. It is widely acknowledged that national treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection must be adapted based on systematic antimicrobial sensitivity testing to curb the rise of global antibiotic resistance. Despite decades of research and clinical practice, identifying the most effective, safe, and straightforward therapy remains a significant challenge for clinicians. This review provides a comparative analysis of current treatment recommendations for Helicobacter pylori infection, as presented by various national and regional gastroenterological societies, including those relevant in the Russian Federation.

Real-world efficacy of second-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

With the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, real-world data on the optimal empirical second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori are still limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the real-world efficacy of various second-line therapies for H. pylori.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all H. pylori-infected patients who had received the second-line treatment after the failure of primary clarithromycin triple therapy in Hong Kong between 2003 and 2018. The retreatment success rates of different second-line therapies were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 7591 patients who received second-line treatment were included. Notably, the most commonly prescribed regimen was still clarithromycin triple therapy, but the frequency of use had decreased from 59.5% in 2003-06 to 28.7% in 2015-18. Concomitant non-bismuth quadruple therapy had emerged as the commonest regimen (from 3.3% to 43.9%). In a validation analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of retreatment-inferred second-line treatment failure were 88.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The overall success rate of second-line therapies was 73.6%. Bismuth quadruple therapy had the highest success rate of 85.6%, while clarithromycin triple therapy had the lowest success rate of 63.5%. Specifically, bismuth/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, metronidazole/tetracycline triple, levofloxacin/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, rifabutin/amoxicillin triple and amoxicillin/levofloxacin triple therapies had relatively higher success rates over 80%. Age, treatment duration, baseline conditions and first-line treatment used were associated with success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Bismuth quadruple therapy was the most effective second-line regimen for H. pylori in this real-world study. Despite a very low success rate, clarithromycin-containing triple therapies were still commonly used as second-line regimens.

Bismuth add-on improves the efficacy of 2-week tegoprazan-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a real-world evidence study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of bismuth added to a 2-week triple therapy consisting of tegoprazan (TPZ), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the retrospective data of patients who received a 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy with or without 300 mg bismuth twice daily. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate of adding bismuth to the TPZ-based triple regimen (TAC-B group), compared to no bismuth added (TAC group).

RESULTS

In total, 306 and 256 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. The eradication success rates were significantly higher in the TAC-B group than in the TAC group (ITT, 82.9% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.029; PP, 95.8% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.027, respectively). The adherence rate to the eradication regimen was 100% in the TAC-B group and 97.0% in the TAC group. The adverse drug event rate in the TAC-B group was comparable to that in the TAC group (29.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.742). No use of bismuth was significantly associated with eradication failure (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The bismuth add-on increased the first-line H. pylori eradication rate of 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05453994.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Bismuth Enhances the Efficacy for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

In the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, the efficacy of bismuth remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the efficacy of bismuth on various H. pylori eradication regimens.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were collected to compare the efficacy of bismuth to nonbismuth regimens in H. pylori eradication. We pooled information to study eradication, adverse events, and drug compliance. In addition, subgroup analyses for eradication efficacy were performed according to high or low clarithromycin-resistance area, bismuth drug form, and amount of bismuth element.

RESULTS

Records for a total of 2506 patients in 15 trials from 13 randomized controlled studies were included. The eradication of H. pylori was superior when bismuth compared to nonbismuth regimen (odds ratio [OR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.00 in intention-to-treat [ITT]; OR = 2.05, 95% CI, 1.58-2.68 in per-protocol [PP] analyses), without significant difference in drug compliance or adverse events. Bismuth regimens in the high clarithromycin resistance area tend to enhance the eradication rate (OR = 1.66, 95% CI, 1.34-2.05 in ITT; OR = 2.22, 95% CI, 1.67-2.95 in PP analyses). Bismuth potassium citrate and bismuth subcitrate were more effective drug forms in regard to eradication rate. Bismuth at a dosage of < 500 mg/day was significantly higher for the eradication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Bismuth to the H. pylori eradication regimens achieve a higher eradication rate, especially in the high clarithromycin resistance area. It could be an eradication option achieving sufficient resistance rates without increasing antibiotic resistance, side effects, or poor compliance.

Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial of 10 and 14 Days

BACKGROUND

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is the first-line treatment for eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The optimal duration for H. pylori eradication using bismuth-containing quadruple therapy remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical effects of the 10- and 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple treatment regimen to eradicate H. pylori.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with H. pylori infection (n = 1300) were enrolled in this multicenter randomized controlled study across five hospitals in China. They were randomized into 10- or 14-day treatment groups to receive bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as follows: vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily; bismuth 220 mg twice daily; amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily; and either clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily or tetracycline 500 mg four times daily. At least 6 weeks after treatment, we performed a 13C-urea breath test to evaluate H. pylori eradication.

RESULTS

The per-protocol eradication rates were 93.22% (564/605) and 93.74% (569/607) (p < 0.001) and the intention-to-treat eradication rates were 88.62% (576/650) and 89.38% (581/650) (p = 0.007) for the 10- and 14-day regimens, respectively. Incidence of adverse effects was lower in patients who received 10- vs. 14 days of treatment (22.59% vs. 28.50%, p = 0.016). We observed no significant differences in the compliance to treatment or the discontinuation of therapy because of severe adverse effects between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple regimens, the 10-day regimen demonstrated a non-inferior efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects. Therefore, the 10-day regimen is safe and tolerated and could be recommended for H. pylori eradication (NCT05049902).

Diagnostics and Treatment of Peptic Ulcer in Adults (Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Gastroenterological Association, the Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons, the Russian Endoscopic Society and the Scientific Society for the Clinical Study of Human Microbiome)

Aim. The guidelines set out the modern methods of diagnostics and treatment of peptic ulcer and are created for gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, general practitioners, surgeons, endoscopists.

Key points. The clinical guidelines contain modern views on the etiology and pathogenesis of peptic ulcer, its clinical features, methods of laboratory and instrumental diagnostics, the main approaches to conservative and surgical treatment. They include the criteria for assessment of the quality of medical care, the algorithm of the doctor's actions, as well as information for the patient.

Conclusion. Knowledge of modern methods of diagnostics and therapy of peptic ulcers will contribute to improving the results of its treatment.

Egg yolk antibody combined with bismuth-based quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection rescue treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled study

Background

The increasing antibiotic resistance is the main issue causing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. As a nutritional supplement, Egg Yolk Antibody (Ig Y) provides a new approach for H. pylori infection rescue therapy.

Methods

In this randomized, controlled study, 100 H. pylori-positive patients with previous H. pylori eradication treatment were included. All individuals received standard bismuth-containing quadruple therapy twice daily (5 mg ilaprazole, 100 mg doxycycline, 500 mg clarithromycin or 1 g amoxicillin or 100 mg furazolidone, and 220 mg colloidal bismuth tartrate) for 14 days and were randomized to receive either twice daily 7 g Ig Y-H. pylori treatment (study group) or not (control group). 4 weeks after the end of treatment, urea breath tests were used to assess the H. pylori eradication rate. All participants scored by the Global Overall Symptom scale (GOS) and recorded adverse events during the trial.

Results

The H. pylori eradication rates were 84.0% (95% CI 73.5-94.5%) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 68.5-91.5%) in the study and control groups at intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 85.7% (95% CI 75.6-95.9%) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 68.5-91.5%) at per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The number of over 80% symptom relief after treatment in the two groups was 27 (60%) and 12 (29.2%) (p < 0.05), and the incidences of adverse events were 4 (8%) and 6 (12%), respectively.

Conclusion

Both groups achieved satisfactory eradication efficiency in H. pylori rescue therapy and Ig Y-H. pylori effectively alleviates the symptoms with good compliance and fewer adverse effects.

Clinical Practice Guidelines of Russian Gastroenterological Association, Scientific Society for the Clinical Study of Human Microbiome, Russian Society for the Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy for <i>H. pylori</i> Diagnostics and Treatment in Adults

Aim: bring to the attention of practitioners indications for anti-Helicobacter therapy, methods and procedure for diagnostics and eradication therapy of Н. pylori infection.

Key points. Chronic gastritis caused by Н. pylori infection, including asymptomatic persons, may be considered as an indication for eradication therapy of Н. pylori as etiological therapy and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer prevention. Indications, for obligatory anti-Helicobacter therapy include peptic ulcer, gastric MALT lymphoma, early gastric cancer (EGC) with endoscopic resection. H. pylori primary diagnostics methods include 13C-urea breath test, H. pylori stool antigen lab test, rapid urease test and serological method. The serological method cannot be used after anti-Helicobacter therapy.

In Russia H. pylori strains' resistance to clarithromycin does not exceed 15 % in most regional studies. The first line therapy for Н. pylori infection eradication is the standard triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and amoxicillin, enhanced with bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate. A classic four-component therapy based on bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate or quadrotherapy without bismuth drug products which includes PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole, may be used as alternative to the first line eradication therapy. The standard triple therapy may be prescribed for 14 days only in those regions, where it has been proven to be effective. Quadrotherapy with bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate is also used as main second line therapy in case of standard triple therapy, bismuth enhanced standard triple therapy or combined therapy failure. Another second line therapy includes PPI, levofloxacin and amoxicillin, to which a bismuth-containing drug product may be added. The third line therapy is selected individually based on previously used treatment settings.

Conclusion. In each case of H. pylori infection the decision for eradication therapy should be made, which is especially relevant as eradication of H. pylori has been recognized as an effective measure for the prevention of gastric cancer.

Clinical Practice Guidelines of Russian Gastroenterological Association, Scientific Society for the Clinical Study of Human Microbiome, Russian Society for the Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy for <i>H. pylori</i> Diagnostics and Treatment in Adults

Aim: bring to the attention of practitioners indications for anti-Helicobacter therapy, methods and procedure for diagnostics and eradication therapy of Н. pylori infection.

Key points. Chronic gastritis caused by Н. pylori infection, including asymptomatic persons, may be considered as an indication for eradication therapy of Н. pylori as etiological therapy and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer prevention. Indications, for obligatory anti-Helicobacter therapy include peptic ulcer, gastric MALT lymphoma, early gastric cancer (EGC) with endoscopic resection. H. pylori primary diagnostics methods include 13C-urea breath test, H. pylori stool antigen lab test, rapid urease test and serological method. The serological method cannot be used after anti-Helicobacter therapy.

In Russia H. pylori strains' resistance to clarithromycin does not exceed 15 % in most regional studies. The first line therapy for Н. pylori infection eradication is the standard triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and amoxicillin, enhanced with bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate. A classic four-component therapy based on bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate or quadrotherapy without bismuth drug products which includes PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole, may be used as alternative to the first line eradication therapy. The standard triple therapy may be prescribed for 14 days only in those regions, where it has been proven to be effective. Quadrotherapy with bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate is also used as main second line therapy in case of standard triple therapy, bismuth enhanced standard triple therapy or combined therapy failure. Another second line therapy includes PPI, levofloxacin and amoxicillin, to which a bismuth-containing drug product may be added. The third line therapy is selected individually based on previously used treatment settings.

Conclusion. In each case of H. pylori infection the decision for eradication therapy should be made, which is especially relevant as eradication of H. pylori has been recognized as an effective measure for the prevention of gastric cancer.