Successful living donor liver retransplantation for graft failure within 7 days due to acute de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody-mediated rejection

Dual Antibody Treatment for Simultaneous Acute Cellular Rejection and Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is uncommon but sometimes has a grave prognosis. We herein describe a 40-year-old man who developed simultaneous acute cellular rejection and acute AMR due to de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after living donor liver transplantation. He underwent living donor liver transplantation with his brother-in-law as the donor. Hepatic function deteriorated on postoperative day 6, and a liver biopsy revealed histologic findings of typical acute cellular rejection. However, steroid pulse therapy and thymoglobulin did not produce a clinical response, and his liver function dramatically deteriorated on postoperative day 13 (aspartate aminotransferase, 2787 IU/L; total bilirubin, 14.1 mg/dL). We diagnosed acute AMR based on positive immunohistochemical staining for C4d in portal areas and added plasma exchange and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin after rituximab. The patient's clinical state improved and ultimately resolved. To our knowledge, this is the first report of dual antibody treatment for simultaneous acute cellular rejection and acute AMR induced by de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Despite his fulminant clinical course, we successfully rescued the recipient with immediate anti-humoral therapy. The rapid treatment decision and adequate understanding of the mechanisms of anti-humoral therapy were crucial to overcoming acute AMR in this case.

Successful management to prevent early graft loss due to Seventh-day Syndrome after liver retransplantation: A case report and literature review

Graft loss characterized by sudden deterioration after initial favorable recovery of the allograft function within the first week after liver transplantation was reported as "seventh-day syndrome." The outcome of seventh-day syndrome is extremely poor, and its etiology and management are not still established. We herein reported a seventh-day syndrome case who was successfully managed by immediate desensitization after liver retransplantation and reviewed by English literature. A 19-year-old woman who had underwent the first liver transplantation when she was 2-year-old. She developed graft failure due to chronic rejection and was on the waiting list for retransplantation. An evaluation of panel-reactive antibody showed high positivity, but there were no preformed donor-specific antibodies. Plasma exchange was performed one-time just before retransplantation and the mean fluorescence intensity significantly decreased. The second liver was successfully transplanted, and post-operative course was uneventful. However, on post-operative day 5, her body temperature elevated and thereafter, her liver enzymes dramatically elevated. We immediately started a desensitization consisted of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-CD20 antibody. The peak level of AST and ALT was 5799 IU/L and 3960 IU/L, respectively. The pathological findings of liver biopsy revealed some central venous endotheliitis and massive centrilobular hemorrhagic hepatocellular necrosis. These findings were not typical for antibody-mediated rejection, but the desensitization was effective and liver graft was successfully rescued. The only way to prevent early graft loss due to seventh-day syndrome is thought to be an immediate decision to start intensive desensitization.

Rituximab Desensitization in Liver Transplant Recipients With Preformed Donor-specific HLA Antibodies: A Japanese Nationwide Survey

Background.

The significance of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplant recipients is controversial. Moreover, there has been no established desensitization protocol for DSA-positive recipients.

Methods.

A Japanese nationwide survey was performed to investigate the clinical practice among preformed DSA-positive patients with special reference to rituximab desensitization.

Results.

There was a total of 47 cases, including 2 pediatric cases, in which rituximab (287 ± 159 mg [319 (50–916)/m²]) was administered to desensitize preformed DSA. The decision for the indication of rituximab desensitization was based on a single-antigen assay in the majority of cases (83%, 39/47), and the most frequent protocol was rituximab monotherapy (n = 12) followed by quadruple treatment with rituximab tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and plasmapheresis (n = 11). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft and patient survival rates among adult patients were 85%, 83%, 83%, and 81%, 77%, 74%, respectively, while neither graft loss nor death was observed in the 2 pediatric cases. The 1-, 3-, and 12-mo cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was 11%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. The incidence of AMR was significantly higher in the lower rituximab dose group than in the higher rituximab dose group (cutoff 300 mg/m², 4% versus 24%, P = 0.041). The rate of infusion-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.4%, and all ADRs were mild and self-limiting. A total of 99 ADRs among 27 patients were reported, none of which were severe adverse events associated with rituximab.

Conclusions.

The rituximab induction was well tolerated among DSA-positive liver transplant recipients with a satisfactory outcome. A rituximab dose >300 mg/m² was observed to achieve less incidence of the development of AMR.

HLA matching and rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy to avoid multiple forms of rejection after a third liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite immunosuppressive drug regimens, T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection with donor-specific antibodies, and chronic rejection occur after liver transplantation (LTx). Rejection may significantly impact allograft survival and often a standard re-LTx is required. However, in some cases rejection recurs. Little is known on how to approach this and which aspects to consider.

CASE

Here we describe a case in which two successive liver grafts where lost due to T cell-mediated rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection with de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and chronic rejection that occurred within a month. In an attempt to avoid recurrence with the third graft, we decided to administer a more rigorous immunosuppressive drug induction regimen with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, while applying HLA matching between recipient and donor. This resulted in rejection free survival for 337 days until a mild T cell-mediated rejection occurred, which could then be easily treated with high dose steroids. Graft survival is now at least 683 days without chronic rejection, antibody-mediated rejection or de novo donor-specific antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, when a liver graft is lost due to multiple forms of rejection short after LTx, the combination applied in this case could be considered as a viable option to improve graft and patient survival instead of a standard re-LTx.

Preformed donor-specific antibodies are associated with 90-day mortality in living-donor liver transplantation

AIM

The impact of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between DSAs and short-term outcomes in LDLT recipients, and to clarify the clinical impact of DSAs.

METHOD

Anti-HLA antibodies were screened in preoperative serum samples taken from 40 liver transplant recipients at Ehime University (Toon, Japan) between August 2001 and July 2015. Screening was carried out using the Flow-PRA method, and DSAs were detected in anti-HLA antibody-positive recipients using the Luminex single-antigen identification test. A mean fluorescence intensity of 1000 was used as the cut-off for positivity. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of patients who were DSA-positive to elucidate early clinical manifestations in LDLT recipients.

RESULTS

Fifteen (12 female and 3 male) patients (38%) had anti-HLA antibodies. Eight of the 15 anti-HLA antibody-positive patients were positive for DSAs, and all were women. The 90-day survival rate of DSA-positive patients (50%) was significantly lower than that of DSA-negative patients (84.4%) (0.0112; Wilcoxon test). On univariate analysis, the DSA-positive rate was significantly higher in the 90-day mortality group. Postoperatively, the incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in DSA-positive than DSA-negative patients. Thrombotic microangiopathy developed only in DSA-positive patients. We found no relationship between DSA status and bile duct stricture.

CONCLUSION

Preformed DSAs could be associated with elevated 90-day mortality in LDLT recipients. Further large-scale studies are required to verify the risk associated with DSAs in LDLT.