Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

IL-34 attenuates acute T cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation by upregulating M2 macrophages polarization

Objective

To investigate the role of Interleukin-34 (IL-34) in acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) following renal transplantation.

Methods

The mice acute TCMR model of renal transplantation was established and identified by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Then, IHC staining of IL-34 was also performed to determine the expression of IL-34 in allografts. Recipients were infected with IL-34 overexpression adeno-associated virus, infection efficiency of which was estimated by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blot, and immunofluorescence. HE and IHC staining were used to estimate the grades of TCMR. Flow cytometry was performed on lymphocytes in spleens of recipients including regulatory T cells (Tregs) and M2 macrophages. The expression of cytokines in vivo was analyzed by Mouse Cytokine Grp I Panel. Finally, Tregs and M2 macrophages were cultured in vitro and treated with IL-34 to observe the effects of IL-34 on the differentiation of the cells.

Results

The mouse TCMR model was successfully established by HE, periodic acid shiff (PAS), CD4 and CD8 IHC staining. The expression of IL-34 was significantly decreased in allografts with TCMR. BALB/c mice were successfully infected with IL-34 overexpression adeno-associated virus. Subsequently, the grade of rejection in mice TCMR model was evaluated by HE and IHC staining according to Banff criteria. It is suggested that the grade of TCMR in IL-34 overexpressed mice was significantly decreased. IHC staining and Flow cytometry showed that the proportion of Tregs and M2 macrophages in the spleens and allografts were significantly increased in IL-34 overexpressed mice. Serum levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), IL-17 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were downregulated in IL-34 overexpressed mice. Moreover, IL-34 could promote macrophage M2 polarization, while failed to promote differentiation of naïve T cells into Tregs in vitro.

Conclusion

Overexpression of IL-34 may attenuate the progression of TCMR episodes in allografts by increasing the polarization of M2 macrophages in the spleens and allografts, which may become a potential therapeutic strategy for TCMR.

Difficult-to-Treat Rejections in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Our Experience with Everolimus-Based Quadruple Maintenance Therapy

All chronic and treatment-resistant acute rejections are "difficult-to-treat" and lead to progressive loss of graft function in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), as no effective treatment exists for such rejections to date. We review our experience with a novel strategy to treat such rejections by adding everolimus as a "rescue" to conventional triple maintenance therapy with prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor. We retrospectively analysed data in 28 KTR who received everolimus-based quadruple therapy at our institution for biopsy-proven chronic active T cell-mediated or antibody-mediated rejection (n = 19) or treatment-resistant acute rejections (n = 9) between 2011-2017. The primary outcome was 5-year death-censored graft survival. Main secondary outcomes were response to treatment defined by stable or improved graft function, 5-year patient survival and discontinuation rate of treatment. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for 5-year death-censored graft survival was 79% in all patients, 90% for patients with chronic active T cell-mediated rejections, 78% for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection and 67% for acute rejections. Response to treatment was achieved in 43% and 5-year patient survival was 94%. Treatment was stopped in 12 (43%) patients due to adverse events. Everolimus-based maintenance quadruple therapy, despite high rate of everolimus discontinuation due to adverse events, may be a valid approach in a subset of kidney transplant recipients with such difficult-to-treat rejections, which otherwise would lead to a high rate of graft loss.

Lowering maintenance immune suppression in elderly kidney transplant recipients; connecting the immunological and clinical dots

The management of long-term immune suppressive medication in kidney transplant recipients is a poorly explored field in the area of transplant medicine. In particular, older recipients are at an increased risk for side effects and have an exponentially increased risk of infection-related death. In contrast, an aged immune system decreases the risk of acute T-cell-mediated rejection in older recipients. Recent advances in alloimmunity research have shown a rapid and substantial decline in polyfunctional, high-risk CD4⁺ T cells post-transplantation. This lowers the direct alloreactivity responsible for T-cell-mediated rejection, also known as donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is the most frequent cause of kidney graft loss in the long term. However, in older adults, c-aABMR as a cause of graft loss is outnumbered by death with a functioning graft. In addition, DSA development and a diagnosis of c-aABMR plateau ~10 years after transplantation, resulting in a very low risk for rejection thereafter. The intensity of immune suppression regimes could likely be reduced accordingly, but trials in this area are scarce. Tacrolimus monotherapy for 1 year after transplantation seems feasible in older kidney transplant recipients with standard immunological risk, showing the expected benefits of fewer infections and better vaccination responses.

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

IL-10-producing memory B regulatory cells as a novel target for HLA-G to prolong human kidney allograft survival

Despite the growing interest in the role of regulatory B cells (Bregs) in autoimmunity, their distinct role and function in kidney transplant outcomes remain elusive. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the proportion of Bregs, transitional Bregs (tBregs) and memory Bregs (mBregs) and their capacity to produce IL-10 in non-rejected (NR) versus rejected (RJ) kidney transplant recipients. In the NR group, we observed a significant increase in the proportion of mBregs (CD19⁺CD24^hiCD27⁺) but no difference in tBregs (CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38⁺), as compared to the RJ group. We also observed a significant increase in IL-10-producing mBregs (CD19⁺CD24^hiCD27⁺IL-10⁺) in the NR group. As our group and others have previously reported a potential role of the human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) in human renal allograft survival, notably through IL-10, we then investigated possible crosstalk between HLA-G and IL-10⁺ mBregs. Our ex vivo data suggest a role of HLA-G in enhancing IL-10⁺ mBreg expansion upon stimulation, which further decreased CD3⁺ T cell proliferation capability. Using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), we identified potential key signaling pathways involved in HLA-G-driven IL-10⁺ mBreg expansion, such as the MAPK, TNF and chemokine signaling pathways. Together, our study highlights a novel HLA-G-mediated IL-10-producing mBreg pathway that may serve as a therapeutic target to improve kidney allograft survival.

Perturbations of the T-cell immune repertoire in kidney transplant rejection

In this cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of mapping the T-cell repertoire in kidney transplant recipients, we have investigated and validated T-cell clonality, immune repertoire chronology at rejection, and contemporaneous allograft biopsy quantitative tissue injury, to better understand the pathobiology of acute T-cell fraction, T-cell repertoire and antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection. To follow the dynamic evolution of T-cell repertoire changes before and after engraftment and during biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, we sequenced 323 peripheral blood samples from 200 unique kidney transplant recipients, with (n=100) and without (n=100) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. We report that patients who develop acute allograft rejection, have lower (p=0.01) T-cell fraction even before transplantation, followed by its rise after transplantation and at the time of acute rejection accompanied by high TCR repertoire turnover (p=0.004). Acute rejection episodes occurring after the first 6 months post-transplantation, and those with a component of antibody-mediated rejection, had the highest turnover; p=0.0016) of their T-cell repertoire. In conclusion, we validated that detecting repertoire changes in kidney transplantation correlates with post-transplant rejection episodes suggesting that T-cell receptor sequencing may provide recipient pre-transplant and post-transplant predictors of rejection risk.

Genome-wide association study biomarkers in T-cell mediated rejection: selective effect according to the Banff classification

BACKGROUND

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) in kidney transplant recipients reported the association of two polymorphisms located in the PTPRO gene and upstream of the CCDC67 (DEUP1) gene with increased risk of acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). We aimed at replicating the assessment of mentioned associations and additionally ascertaining the influence of treatment and clinical features of the patients.

METHODS

The polymorphisms, PTPRO-rs7976329 and CCDC67-rs10765602 were genotyped by TaqMan chemistry in 641 consecutive kidney transplant recipients. The diagnosis of rejection was confirmed by biopsy and categorized according to the Banff classification. Associations were evaluated by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when necessary and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Considering the GWAS study we only replicated the association of the PTPRO-rs7976329*C allele in the Banff grade < II subjects. However, the homozygous mutant genotypes of both polymorphism seemed to increase the risk of TCMR Banff grade < II in the overall cohort and after stratification by Thymoglobulin induction therapy. In the multivariate analysis, we confirmed the association of PTPRO-rs7976329 with TCMR Banff grade < II, independently of the Thymoglobulin induction therapy and of CCDC67-rs10765602 only in the group of patients not receiving Thymoglobulin induction therapy. No association of these polymorphisms with TCMR Banff grade ≥ II was observed in either the overall cohort or in the subgroups stratified by Thymoglobulin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the increased risk of TCMR related to polymorphisms PTPRO-rs7976329 and CCDC67-rs10765602 previously reported in a GWAS was replicated only in homozygous patients who presented TCMR Banff grade < II and for the minor allele of either polymorphism.

The impact of methodological choices when developing predictive models using urinary metabolite data

The continuous evolution of metabolomics over the past two decades has stimulated the search for metabolic biomarkers of many diseases. Metabolomic data measured from urinary samples can provide rich information of the biological events triggered by organ rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. With additional validation, metabolic markers can be used to build clinically useful diagnostic tools. However, there are many methodological steps ranging from data processing to modeling that can influence the performance of the resulting metabolomic classifiers. In this study we focus on the comparison of various classification methods that can handle the complex structure of metabolomic data, including regularized classifiers, partial least squares discriminant analysis, and nonlinear classification models. We also examine the effectiveness of a physiological normalization technique widely used in the clinical and biochemical literature but not extensively analyzed and compared in urine metabolomic studies. While the main objective of this work is to interrogate metabolomic data of pediatric kidney transplant recipients to improve the diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), we also analyze three independent datasets from other disease conditions to investigate the generalizability of our findings.

Diagnostic Biomarkers and Immune Infiltration in Patients With T Cell-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is an important rejection type in kidney transplantation, characterized by T cells and macrophages infiltration. The application of bioinformatic analysis in genomic research has been widely used. In the present study, Microarray data was analyzed to identify the potential diagnostic markers of TCMR in kidney transplantation. Cell-type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcript (CIBERSORT) was performed to determine the distribution of immune cell infiltration in the pathology. Totally 129 upregulated differently expressed genes (DEGs) and 378 downregulated DEGs were identified. The GO and KEGG results demonstrated that DEGs were mainly associated with pathways and diseases involved in immune response. The intersection of the two algorithms (PPI network and LASSO) contains three overlapping genes (CXCR6, CXCL13 and FCGR1A). After verification in GSE69677, only CXCR6 and CXCL13 were selected. Immune cells Infiltration analysis demonstrated that CXCR6 and CXCL13 were positively correlated with gamma delta T cells (p < 0.001), CD4⁺ memory activated T cells (p < 0.001), CD8⁺ T cells (p < 0.001) and M1 macrophages (p = 0.006), and negatively correlated with M2 macrophages (p < 0.001) and regulatory T cells (p < 0.001). Immunohistochemical staining and image analysis confirmed the overexpression of CXCR6 and CXCL13 in human allograft TCMR samples. CXCR6 and CXCL13 could be diagnostic biomarkers of TCMR and potential targets for immunotherapy in patients with TCMR.

The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era

The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.

The Biology and Molecular Basis of Organ Transplant Rejection

Allograft rejection is defined as tissue injury in a transplanted allogeneic organ produced by the effector mechanisms of the adaptive alloimmune response. Effector T lymphocytes and IgG alloantibodies cause two different types of rejection that can occur either individually or simultaneously: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In TCMR, cognate effector T cells infiltrate the graft and orchestrate an interstitial inflammatory response in the kidney interstitium in which effector T cells engage antigen-presenting myeloid cells, activating the T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and macrophages. The result is intense expression of IFNG and IFNG-induced molecules, expression of effector T cell molecules and macrophage molecules and checkpoints, and deterioration of parenchymal function. The diagnostic lesions of TCMR follow, i.e. interstitial inflammation, parenchymal deterioration, and intimal arteritis. In ABMR, HLA IgG alloantibodies produced by plasma cells bind to the donor antigens on graft microcirculation, leading to complement activation, margination, and activation of NK cells and neutrophils and monocytes, and endothelial injury, sometimes with intimal arteritis. TCMR becomes infrequent after 5-10 years post-transplant, probably reflecting adaptive mechanisms such as checkpoints, but ABMR can present even decades post-transplant. Some rejection is triggered by inadequate immunosuppression and non-adherence, challenging the clinician to target effective immunosuppression even decades post-transplant.

Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora’s box

Chronic rejection (CR) of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation. Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy, CR still represents an important cause of graft injury, which might be irreversible, leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation. To date, we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process. In addition to T cell-mediated CR, which was initially the only recognized type of CR, recently a new form of liver allograft CR, antibody-mediated CR, has been identified. This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field. Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR, but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation. Moreover, the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury, which should not be disregarded. Therapies for CR may only be effective in the “early” phases, and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR, focusing on early detection, identification of non-invasive biomarkers, immunosuppressive management, re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.

Non-invasive alloimmune risk stratification of long-term liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Management of long-term immunosuppression following liver transplantation (LT) remains empirical. Surveillance liver biopsies in combination with transcriptional profiling could overcome this challenge by identifying recipients with active alloimmune-mediated liver damage despite normal liver tests, but this approach lacks applicability. Our aim was to investigate the utility of non-invasive tools for the stratification of stable long-term survivors of LT, according to their immunological risk and need for immunosuppression.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study of 190 adult LT recipients assessed to determine their eligibility to participate in an immunosuppression withdrawal trial. Patients had stable liver allograft function and had been transplanted for non-autoimmune non-replicative viral liver disease >3 years before inclusion. We performed histological, immunogenetic and serological studies and measured the intrahepatic transcript levels of an 11-gene classifier highly specific for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR).

RESULTS

In this cohort, 35.8% of patients harboured clinically silent fibro-inflammatory liver lesions (13.7% had mild damage and 22.1% had moderate-to-severe damage). The severity of liver allograft damage was positively associated with TCMR-related transcripts, class II donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), ALT, AST, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and negatively correlated with serum creatinine and tacrolimus trough levels. Liver biopsies were stratified according to their TCMR transcript levels using a cut-off derived from biopsies with clinically significant TCMR. Two multivariable prediction models, integrating ALT+LSM or ALT+class II DSAs, had a high discriminative capacity for classifying patients with or without alloimmune damage. The latter model performed well in an independent cohort of 156 liver biopsies obtained from paediatric liver recipients with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

ALT, class II DSAs and LSM are valuable tools to non-invasively identify stable LT recipients without significant underlying alloimmunity who could benefit from minimisation of immunosuppression.

LAY SUMMARY

A large proportion of liver transplant patients with normal liver tests have inflammatory liver lesions, which in 17% of cases are molecularly indistinguishable from those seen at the time of rejection. ALT, class II donor-specific antibodies and liver stiffness are useful in identifying patients with this form of subclinical rejection. We propose these markers as a useful tool to help clinicians determine if the immunosuppression administered is adequate.

Clinical Validation of an Immune Quiescence Gene Expression Signature in Kidney Transplantation

Background

Despite advances in immune suppression, kidney allograft rejection and other injuries remain a significant clinical concern, particularly with regards to long-term allograft survival. Evaluation of immune activity can provide information about rejection status and help guide interventions to extend allograft life. Here, we describe the validation of a blood gene expression classifier developed to differentiate immune quiescence from both T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).

Methods

A five-gene classifier (DCAF12, MARCH8, FLT3, IL1R2, and PDCD1) was developed on 56 peripheral blood samples and validated on two sample sets independent of the training cohort. The primary validation set comprised 98 quiescence samples and 18 rejection samples: seven TCMR, ten ABMR, and one mixed rejection. The second validation set included eight quiescence and 11 rejection samples: seven TCMR, two ABMR, and two mixed rejection. AlloSure donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was also evaluated.

Results

AlloMap Kidney classifier scores in the primary validation set differed significantly between quiescence (median, 9.49; IQR, 7.68-11.53) and rejection (median, 13.09; IQR, 11.25-15.28), with P<0.001. In the second validation set, the cohorts were statistically different (P=0.03) and the medians were similar to the primary validation set. The AUC for discriminating rejection from quiescence was 0.786 for the primary validation and 0.800 for the second validation. AlloMap Kidney results were not significantly correlated with AlloSure, although both were elevated in rejection. The ability to discriminate rejection from quiescence was improved when AlloSure and AlloMap Kidney were used together (AUC, 0.894).

Conclusion

Validation of AlloMap Kidney demonstrated the ability to differentiate between rejection and immune quiescence using a range of scores. The diagnostic performance suggests that assessment of the mechanisms of immunologic activity is complementary to allograft injury information derived from AlloSure dd-cfDNA. Together, these biomarkers offer a more comprehensive assessment of allograft health and immune quiescence.

HLA matching and rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy to avoid multiple forms of rejection after a third liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite immunosuppressive drug regimens, T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection with donor-specific antibodies, and chronic rejection occur after liver transplantation (LTx). Rejection may significantly impact allograft survival and often a standard re-LTx is required. However, in some cases rejection recurs. Little is known on how to approach this and which aspects to consider.

CASE

Here we describe a case in which two successive liver grafts where lost due to T cell-mediated rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection with de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and chronic rejection that occurred within a month. In an attempt to avoid recurrence with the third graft, we decided to administer a more rigorous immunosuppressive drug induction regimen with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, while applying HLA matching between recipient and donor. This resulted in rejection free survival for 337 days until a mild T cell-mediated rejection occurred, which could then be easily treated with high dose steroids. Graft survival is now at least 683 days without chronic rejection, antibody-mediated rejection or de novo donor-specific antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, when a liver graft is lost due to multiple forms of rejection short after LTx, the combination applied in this case could be considered as a viable option to improve graft and patient survival instead of a standard re-LTx.

Artemisinin Attenuates Transplant Rejection by Inhibiting Multiple Lymphocytes and Prolongs Cardiac Allograft Survival

Immunological rejection is an important factor resulting in allograft dysfunction, and more valid therapeutic methods need to be explored to improve allograft outcomes. Many researches have indicated that artemisinin and its derivative exhibits immunosuppressive functions, apart from serving as a traditional anti-malarial drug. In this assay, we further explored the therapeutic effects of artemisinin for transplant rejection in a rat cardiac transplantation model. We found that it markedly attenuated allograft rejection and histological injury and significantly prolonged the survival of allograft. Upon further exploring the mechanism, we demonstrated that artemisinin not only attenuated T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by reducing effector T cell infiltration and inflammatory cytokine secretion and increasing regulatory T cell infiltration and immunoregulatory cytokine levels, but also attenuated antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) through inhibition of B cells activation and antibody production. Furthermore, artemisinin also reduced macrophage infiltration in allografts, which was determined to be important for TCMR and ABMR. Moreover, we demonstrated that artemisinin significantly inhibited the function of pure T cells, B cells, and macrophages in vitro. All in all, this study provide evidence that artemisinin significantly attenuates TCMR and ABMR by targeting multiple effectors. Therefore, this agent might have potential for use in clinical settings to protect against transplant rejection.

Clinical and Analytical Validation of a Novel Urine-Based Test for the Detection of Allograft Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients

In this clinical validation study, we developed and validated a urinary Q-Score generated from the quantitative test QSant, formerly known as QiSant, for the detection of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in kidney transplants. Using a cohort of 223 distinct urine samples collected from three independent sites and from both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients, we examined the diagnostic utility of the urinary Q-Score for detection of acute rejection in renal allografts. Statistical models based upon the measurements of the six QSant biomarkers (cell-free DNA, methylated-cell-free DNA, clusterin, CXCL10, creatinine, and total protein) generated a renal transplant Q-Score that reliably differentiated stable allografts from acute rejections in both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients. The composite Q-Score was able to detect both T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection patients and differentiate them from stable non-rejecting patients with a receiver–operator characteristic curve area under the curve of 99.8% and an accuracy of 98.2%. Q-Scores < 32 indicated the absence of active rejection and Q-Scores ≥ 32 indicated an increased risk of active rejection. At the Q-Score cutoff of 32, the overall sensitivity was 95.8% and specificity was 99.3%. At a prevalence of 25%, positive and negative predictive values for active rejection were 98.0% and 98.6%, respectively. The Q-Score also detected subclinical rejection in patients without an elevated serum creatinine level but identified by a protocol biopsy. This study confirms that QSant is an accurate and quantitative measurement suitable for routine monitoring of renal allograft status.

Suppressor of cytokine signaling genes in renal transplant receivers: Association with transplant fate

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins have acknowledged roles in regulation of immune responses. Moreover, their role in the evolution of allograft rejection is being elucidated. In the current investigation, we measured transcript levels of SOCS1-4 in the peripheral blood of a group of renal transplant recipients including both rejected and non-rejected allografts. Expression analyses showed that relative expression of SOCS2 was significantly higher in transplant-rejected male patients compared to non-rejected group. However, such significant difference was not detected between female subjects. Expression of SOCS2 was significantly higher in T-cell-mediated rejection group compared with non-rejected individuals with creatinine rise (Relative expression difference [95% CrI] =6.74 [0.94, 12.65], P = 0.043). Conversely, SOCS4 expression was significantly lower in T-cell-mediated rejection group compared with non-rejected individuals with creatinine rise (Relative expression difference [95% CrI] = -0.35 [-0.63, -0.1], P = 0.008). Patterns of correlations between expression levels of SOCS genes were different in non-rejected group. The obtained results indicate the role SOCS genes in development of allograft rejection.

Chemokine CXCL13 as a New Systemic Biomarker for B-Cell Involvement in Acute T Cell-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection

The presence of B-cell clusters in allogenic T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) of kidney allografts is linked to more severe disease entities. In this study we characterized B-cell infiltrates in patients with TCMR and examined the role of serum CXCL-13 in these patients and experimentally. CXCL-13 serum levels were analyzed in 73 kidney allograft recipients at the time of allograft biopsy. In addition, four patients were evaluated for CXCL13 levels during the first week after transplantation. ELISA was done to measure CXCL-13 serum levels. For further mechanistic understanding, a translational allogenic kidney transplant (ktx) mouse model for TCMR was studied in BalbC recipients of fully mismatched transplants with C57BL/6 donor kidneys. CXCL-13 serum levels were measured longitudinally, CD20 and CD3 composition and CXCL13 mRNA in tissue were examined by flow cytometry and kidneys were examined by histology and immunohistochemistry. We found significantly higher serum levels of the B-cell chemoattractant CXCL13 in patients with TCMR compared to controls and patients with borderline TCMR. Moreover, in patients with acute rejection within the first week after ktx, a >5-fold CXCL13 increase was measured and correlated with B-cell infiltrates in the biopsies. In line with the clinical findings, TCMR in mice correlated with increased systemic serum-CXCL13 levels. Moreover, renal allografts had significantly higher CXCL13 mRNA expression than isogenic controls and showed interstitial CD20+ B-cell clusters and CD3+ cell infiltrates accumulating in the vicinity of renal vessels. CXCL13 blood levels correlate with B-cell involvement in TCMR and might help to identify patients at risk of a more severe clinical course of rejection.

False Elevation of the Blood Tacrolimus Concentration, as Assessed by an Affinity Column-mediated Immunoassay (ACMIA), Led to Acute T Cell-mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

Tacrolimus is the most commonly used immunosuppressant. Because of its narrow therapeutic range, it is necessary to frequently monitor its concentration. We report the case of a 25-year-old man who underwent kidney transplantation whose tacrolimus concentrations, as measured by an affinity column-mediated immunoassay, were falsely elevated. As we reduced the dose of tacrolimus, the recipient developed T cell-mediated rejection. Using the same blood samples, an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique showed that the patient's levels of tacrolimus were extremely low. A further examination indicated that the false increase in the tacrolimus concentration was likely due to an unknown interfering substance. We administered methylprednisolone and antithymocyte-globulin. The patient's serum creatinine level decreased and remained stable after these treatments.

Proteomics for rejection diagnosis in renal transplant patients: Where are we now?

Rejection is one of the key factors that determine the long-term allograft function and survival in renal transplant patients. Reliable and timely diagnosis is important to treat rejection as early as possible. Allograft biopsies are not suitable for continuous monitoring of rejection. Thus, there is an unmet need for non-invasive methods to diagnose acute and chronic rejection. Proteomics in urine and blood samples has been explored for this purpose in 29 studies conducted since 2003. This review describes the different proteomic approaches and summarizes the results from the studies that examined proteomics for the rejection diagnoses. The potential limitations and open questions in establishing proteomic markers for rejection are discussed, including ongoing trials and future challenges to this topic.

Preventing T cell rejection of pig xenografts

Xenotransplantation is a potential solution to the limited supply of donor organs. While early barriers to xenograft acceptance, such as hyperacute rejection, are now largely avoided through genetic engineering, the next frontier in successful xenograft survival will require prevention of T cell-mediated rejection. Most successful immunosuppressive regimens in xenotransplantation utilize T cell depletion with antibody therapy. Additionally, the use of T cell costimulatory blockade - specifically blockade of the CD40-CD154 pathway - shows promise with several reports of long-term xenograft survival. Additional therapies, such as transgenic expression of T cell coinhibitory molecules or transfer of immunomodulatory cells to promote tolerance, may be necessary to achieve reliable long-term xenograft acceptance. Further studies in pre-clinical models are essential in order to optimize these regimens prior to trials in patients.

Key role for CD4 T cells during mixed antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts

We utilized mouse models to elucidate the immunologic mechanisms of functional graft loss during mixed antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts (mixed AMR), in which humoral and cellular responses to the graft occur concomitantly. Although the majority of T cells in the graft at the time of rejection were CD8 T cells with only a minor population of CD4 T cells, depletion of CD4 but not CD8 cells prevented acute graft loss during mixed AMR. CD4 depletion eliminated antidonor alloantibodies and conferred protection from destruction of renal allografts. ELISPOT revealed that CD4 T effectors responded to donor alloantigens by both the direct and indirect pathways of allorecognition. In transfer studies, CD4 T effectors primed to donor alloantigens were highly effective at promoting acute graft dysfunction, and exhibited the attributes of effector T cells. Laser capture microdissection and confirmatory immunostaining studies revealed that CD4 T cells infiltrating the graft produced effector molecules with graft destructive potential. Bioluminescent imaging confirmed that CD4 T effectors traffic to the graft site in immune replete hosts. These data document that host CD4 T cells can promote acute dysfunction of renal allografts by directly mediating graft injury in addition to facilitating antidonor alloantibody responses.

Potential impact of microarray diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplants: The INTERCOM study

We previously developed a microarray-based test for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in a reference set of 403 biopsies. To determine the potential impact of this test in clinical practice, we undertook INTERCOM, a prospective international study of 300 indication biopsies from 264 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01299168). Biopsies from six centers-Baltimore, Barcelona, Edmonton, Hannover, Manchester and Minneapolis-were analyzed by microarrays, assigning TCMR scores by an algorithm developed in the reference set and comparing TCMR scores to local histology assessment. The TCMR score correlated with histologic TCMR lesions-tubulitis and interstitial infiltration. The accuracy for primary histologic diagnoses (0.87) was similar to the reference set (0.89). The TCMR scores reclassified 77/300 biopsies (26%): 16 histologic TCMR were molecularly non-TCMR; 15 histologic non-TCMR were molecularly TCMR, including 6 with polyoma virus nephropathy; and all 46 "borderline" biopsies were reclassified as TCMR (8) or non-TCMR (38). Like the reference set, discrepancies were primarily in situations where histology has known limitations, for example, in biopsies with scarring and inflammation/tubulitis potentially from other diseases. Neither the TCMR score nor histologic TCMR was associated with graft loss. Thus the molecular TCMR score has potential to add new insight, particularly in situations where histology is ambiguous or potentially misleading.