1
|
Ioannou E, Humphreys H, Homer C, Purvis A. Barriers and system improvements for physical activity promotion after gestational diabetes: A qualitative exploration of the views of healthcare professionals. Diabet Med 2024; 41:e15426. [PMID: 39153179 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
AIM Physical activity is an important behaviour for managing the ten times increased risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes. Previous studies exploring physical activity promotion in healthcare focus on general practitioners but have not explored the gestational diabetes pathway. Therefore, this paper explores the barriers to and suggestions for, activity promotion along the gestational diabetes healthcare pathway. METHODS The paper was written in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Patient and Public Involvement with women who had lived experiences of gestational diabetes informed purposeful sampling by identifying which healthcare professional roles should be targeted in participant recruitment. Participants were recruited through word-of-mouth, that is, email and connections with local healthcare service leads. Twelve participants took part in semi-structured one-to-one interviews, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants included a Public Health Midwife (n = 1), Diabetes Midwifes (n = 3), Diabetes Dietitian (n = 1), Diabetes Consultants (n = 2), Diabetes Specialist Nurse (n = 1), general practitioners (n = 2), Practice nurse (n = 1) and a Dietitian from the UK National Diabetes Prevention Program (n = 1). Six themes were generated: 'management of gestational diabetes takes precedent', 'poor continuity of care', 'lack of capacity to promote PA', 'beliefs about the acceptability of PA promotion', 'resources to support conversations about PA' and 'adapting healthcare services for women post-gestational diabetes'. CONCLUSIONS During pregnancy messaging around physical activity is consistent, yet this is specific for managing gestational diabetes and is not followed through postnatally. Improvements in continuity of care are necessary, in addition to ensuring the availability and links with wider exercise and activity schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elysa Ioannou
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Humphreys
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology (CeBSAP), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Catherine Homer
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Purvis
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hewitt RM, Dale C, Purcell C, Pattinson R, Bundy C. A Qualitative Exploration of the Impact, Management, and Existing Psychological Support Available for Adults Living with Skin Conditions. Acta Derm Venereol 2024; 104:adv40657. [PMID: 39175451 PMCID: PMC11358848 DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Skin conditions carry a significant physical, psychological, and social burden. People with skin conditions often engage in health-threatening behaviours that can worsen symptoms and increase cardiovascular disease risk. However, access to dedicated psychological and behaviour-change support is limited. The impact, management, and existing psychological support available to adults living with skin conditions was qualitatively explored to inform the development of a psychologically supportive digital intervention. Qualitative research involving a hybrid inductive- deductive approach was performed. Data collection and analysis were theoretically informed by the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation. Eight synchronous online group interviews with 43 English-speaking adults (≥ 18 years) with a range of skin conditions were conducted. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Three superordinate themes are outlined: (i) visibility underpinning life course impairment, (ii) seeking control amid uncertainty, and (iii) existing support for people with skin conditions. Skin conditions carry a substantial psychological burden, yet dermatology service provision is sub-optimal and patients often resort to seeking support from unreliable sources. Psychological support can have benefits, but barriers exist. This study reinforces the need for high-quality psychological support, and that patients wanted digital means to support effective self- management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carys Dale
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | | | - Rachael Pattinson
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK; School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | - Christine Bundy
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Withers TM, Greaves CJ, Bown MJ, Saratzis A. Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: development of the cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:17. [PMID: 38287363 PMCID: PMC10823620 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an important cardiovascular health problem. Ultrasound screening is proven to reduce AAA mortality and programmes have been implemented in some healthcare systems. Those who are identified as having a small AAA in screening enter into a surveillance programme to monitor AAA size. Individuals in AAA surveillance are at elevated risk of cardiovascular events, which is not currently addressed sufficiently. We aimed to develop a simple intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk, which could be embedded in AAA surveillance pathways. METHODS Intervention mapping methods were used to co-develop the intervention with individuals with AAA, families/carers, and healthcare staff. We identified "targets for change" by synthesising research evidence and international guidelines and consulting with patients, caregivers and health service providers. We conducted a series of workshops to identify barriers to and facilitators of change and used taxonomies of behaviour change theories and techniques to match intervention strategies to each target. Further stakeholder involvement work helped refine the intervention. RESULTS The developed intervention focusses on assessment and individually tailored discussion of risk factors, exchanging information, building motivation and action planning, followed by review of progress and problem-solving. Workbooks covering physical activity, diet, stress management, alcohol, smoking, blood pressure and mental health are provided to support behaviour change. The intervention is facilitated by trained healthcare professionals during the patient's AAA screening appointment for the duration that they are in surveillance. DISCUSSION The developed intervention will now be tested to assess whether it can be integrated with the current AAA screening programme. The developed intervention is a novel approach to reducing cardiovascular disease in the AAA population, it is also the first intervention which tries to do this in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN93993995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom M Withers
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matt J Bown
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Athanasios Saratzis
- University Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pattinson R, Trialonis-Suthakharan N, Hewitt RM, Valencia López MJ, Tahmasebi Gandomkari N, Austin J, FitzGerald A, Courtier N, Augustin M, Bundy C. Evidence of the content validity, acceptability, and feasibility of a new Patient-Reported Impact of Dermatological Diseases measure. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1020523. [PMID: 37215711 PMCID: PMC10196461 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1020523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Global Research on the Impact of Dermatological Diseases (GRIDD) team is developing the new Patient-Reported Impact of Dermatological Diseases (PRIDD) measure of the impact of dermatological conditions on the patient's life, in partnership with patients. To develop PRIDD, we conducted a systematic review, followed by a qualitative interview study with 68 patients worldwide and subsequently a global Delphi survey of 1,154 patients to ensure PRIDD items were meaningful and important to patients. Objective To pilot test PRIDD with patients with dermatological conditions, focusing on its content validity (comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and relevance), acceptability, and feasibility. Methods We conducted a theory-led qualitative study using the Three-Step Test-Interview method of cognitive interviewing. Three rounds of semi-structured interviews were conducted online. Adults (≥ 18 years) living with a dermatological condition and who spoke English sufficiently to take part in the interview were recruited through the International Alliance of Dermatology Patient Organizations' (GlobalSkin) global membership network. The topic guide met the gold-standard COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) standards for cognitive interviewing. Analysis followed the thematic analytical model of cognitive interviewing. Results Twelve people (58% male) representing six dermatological conditions from four countries participated. Overall, patients found PRIDD to be comprehensible, comprehensive, relevant, acceptable, and feasible. Participants were able to discern the conceptual framework domains from the items. Feedback resulted in: the recall period being extended from 1 week to 1 month; removal of the 'not relevant' response option; and changes to the instructions and item ordering and wording to improve clarity and increase respondents' confidence in their ability to respond. These evidence-based adjustments resulted in a 26-item version of PRIDD. Conclusion This study met the gold-standard COSMIN criteria for the pilot testing of health measurement instruments. The data triangulated our previous findings, in particular the conceptual framework of impact. Our findings illuminate how patients understand and respond to PRIDD and other patient-reported measurement instruments. The results of comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of PRIDD provide evidence of content validity from the target population. The next step in the development and validation of PRIDD is psychometric testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Pattinson
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Nirohshah Trialonis-Suthakharan
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachael M. Hewitt
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Maria José Valencia López
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nasim Tahmasebi Gandomkari
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jennifer Austin
- International Alliance of Dermatology Patient Organizations, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Allison FitzGerald
- International Alliance of Dermatology Patient Organizations, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nick Courtier
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Augustin
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chris Bundy
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foster J, Teske NM, Zigler CK, Hamilton A, Jacobe H. Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review. JID INNOVATIONS 2023; 3:100172. [PMID: 36891031 PMCID: PMC9986021 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The focus of this review was to determine how qualitative methods are used in dermatology research and whether published manuscripts meet current standards for qualitative research. A scoping review of manuscripts published in English between January 1, 2016 and September 22, 2021 was conducted. A coding document was developed to collect information on authors, methodology, participants, research theme, and the presence of quality criteria as outlined by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Manuscripts were included if they described original qualitative research about dermatologic conditions or topics of primary interest to dermatology. An adjacency search yielded 372 manuscripts, and after screening, 134 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies utilized interviews or focus groups, and researchers predominantly selected participants on the basis of disease status, including over 30 common and rare dermatologic conditions. Research themes frequently included patient experience of disease, development of patient-reported outcomes, and descriptions of provider and caregiver experiences. Although most authors explained their analysis and sampling strategy and included empirical data, few referenced qualitative data reporting standards. Missed opportunities for qualitative methods in dermatology include examination of health disparities, exploration of surgical and cosmetic dermatology experiences, and determination of the lived experience of and provider attitudes toward diverse patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Foster
- Department of Dermatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Noelle M. Teske
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christina K. Zigler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Hamilton
- Health Science Education and Research Librarian, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Heidi Jacobe
- Department of Dermatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hewitt RM, Ploszajski M, Purcell C, Pattinson R, Jones B, Wren GH, Hughes O, Ridd MJ, Thompson AR, Bundy C. A mixed methods systematic review of digital interventions to support the psychological health and well-being of people living with dermatological conditions. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1024879. [PMID: 36405626 PMCID: PMC9669071 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1024879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dermatological conditions can have a substantial impact on psychological as well as physical health yet dedicated face-to-face psychological support for patients is lacking. Thus, individuals may require additional support to self-manage dermatological conditions effectively. Digital technology can contribute to long-term condition management, but knowledge of the effectiveness of digital interventions addressing psychological (cognitive, emotional, and behavioural) aspects of dermatological conditions is limited. Objectives To identify, determine the effectiveness, and explore people’s views and experiences of digital interventions supporting the psychological health of people with dermatological conditions. Methods A mixed methods systematic review informed by JBI methodology. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Eight electronic databases were searched for papers written between January 2002 and October 2021. Data screening and extraction were conducted in Covidence. The methodological quality of studies were scrutinised against JBI critical appraisal tools. Intervention characteristics were captured using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist and guide. Data were synthesised using a convergent segregated approach. The results were reported in a narrative summary. Results Twenty-three papers were identified from 4,883 references, including 15 randomised controlled trials. Nineteen interventions were condition-specific, 13 were delivered online, 16 involved an educational component, and 7 endorsed established, evidence-based therapeutic approaches. Improvements in knowledge, mood, quality of life, the therapeutic relationship, and reduced disease severity in the short to medium term, were reported, although there was substantial heterogeneity within the literature. Thirteen studies captured feedback from users, who considered various digital interventions as convenient and helpful for improving knowledge, emotion regulation, and personal control, but technical and individual barriers to use were reported. Use of established qualitative methodologies was limited and, in some cases, poorly reported. Conclusion Some web-based digital psychological interventions seem to be acceptable to people living with mainly psoriasis and eczema. Whilst some digital interventions benefitted cognitive and emotional factors, heterogeneity and inconsistencies in the literature meant definitive statements about their effectiveness could not be drawn. Interdisciplinary and patient-centred approaches to research are needed to develop and test quality digital interventions supporting the psychological health of adults living with common and rare dermatological conditions. Systematic review registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=285435], identifier [CRD42021285435].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael M. Hewitt
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care–A JBI Centre of Excellence, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Rachael M. Hewitt,
| | | | - Catherine Purcell
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Pattinson
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Bethan Jones
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Georgina H. Wren
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Hughes
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J. Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew R. Thompson
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- South Wales Clinical Psychology Training Programme, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board – School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Bundy
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hewitt RM, Bundy C, Newi A, Chachos E, Sommer R, Kleyn CE, Augustin M, Griffiths CE, Blome C. How do dermatologists' personal models inform a patient-centred approach to management: a qualitative study using the example of prescribing a new treatment (Apremilast). Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:82-88. [PMID: 35064926 PMCID: PMC9540747 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of dermatology consultations is partly determined by how clinicians approach patient care. The term 'Personal Models' describes the explanatory frameworks of thoughts, feelings and experiences that drive behaviour. One study found that clinicians' personal models, specifically their beliefs about autonomy and patient self-management, influenced the degree to which clinicians engage patients in shared decision making during consultations. Further research is needed to further explore how clinicians' personal models inform and affect the quality of patient care. OBJECTIVES To explore how clinicians' personal models inform shared decision making and consultation style in managing people living with psoriasis in the context of a new treatment, Apremilast. METHODS A framework analysis of qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with 13 dermatologists from the UK and Germany who participated in a novel medicine trial for psoriasis called APPRECIATE. RESULTS Two themes were derived from the data. Theme 1, 'personal working models of patient care', comprised two subthemes: 'patient-centredness: a continuum' and 'stereotypes and assumptions'. Theme 2, 'impact of personal working models on patient care', included three subthemes: 'shared decision making: a continuum', 'consultation skills' and 'impact of concerns about Apremilast on prescribing behaviour'. CONCLUSIONS Although many dermatologists endorsed a patient-centred approach, not all reported working in this way. Clinicians' personal models, their beliefs, stereotypes, personal perceptions and assumptions about patients are likely to affect their prescribing behaviour and shared decision making. Additional specialized training and education could increase patient-centredness and whole-person management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael M. Hewitt
- School of Healthcare SciencesCollege of Biomedical & Lifesciences, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Chris Bundy
- School of Healthcare SciencesCollege of Biomedical & Lifesciences, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Antonia‐Luise Newi
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP)University Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Evangelos Chachos
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental HealthMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Rachel Sommer
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP)University Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - C. Elise Kleyn
- The Dermatology CentreUniversity of Manchester, Barnes Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Matthias Augustin
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP)University Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Christopher E.M. Griffiths
- The Dermatology CentreUniversity of Manchester, Barnes Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Christine Blome
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP)University Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barrett S, Begg S, O'Halloran P, Rodda K, Barrett G, Kingsley M. “Exercise Is My Medicine”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experiences of Non-admitted Patients Receiving Physical Activity Promotion From Hospital Surgeons. Front Public Health 2022; 10:915496. [PMID: 35719636 PMCID: PMC9204139 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.915496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hospital clinicians are increasingly encouraged to use outpatient consultations as an avenue to deliver opportunistic health promotion. There is a dearth of evidence regarding the acceptance of health promotion initiatives from hospital patients themselves. Methods We explored the experiences of non-admitted patients who, during a routine consultation with a hospital surgeon received a recommendation to increase physical activity (PA) and a recommendation to engage in a PA telephone coaching program. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who had received the recommendation and proceeded to enroll in a telephone coaching intervention to identify factors that influenced behavior change. Data were analyzed thematically. Results Participants' age ranged between 42 and 66 years, with the average age being 54 years. Of the participants, 15 (68%) were women and 7 (32%) were men. Three major themes were identified: (1) the hospital visit represented an opportunity for behavior change that is not to be missed; (2) surgeons were influential in promoting PA change contemplation; and (3) patients welcomed a communication style that promoted autonomy. Conclusions Almost all patients considered receiving the recommendation to engage with the telephone coaching as acceptable and helpful toward PA change. Although working in time-restricted consultations, surgeons delivered the recommendation in a patient-centered, autonomy-supportive way, which influenced behavior change. Hospitals should explore avenues to integrate health promotion into routine care, confident of the acceptability and appropriateness of health promotion practice to hospital patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Barrett
- Health Promotion Department, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Begg
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul O'Halloran
- Centre for Sport and Social Impact, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kane Rodda
- Outpatient Rehabilitation Services, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - Gabrielle Barrett
- Health Promotion Department, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Kingsley
- Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
- Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- *Correspondence: Michael Kingsley
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cordingley L, Nelson PA, Davies L, Ashcroft D, Bundy C, Chew-Graham C, Chisholm A, Elvidge J, Hamilton M, Hilton R, Kane K, Keyworth C, Littlewood A, Lovell K, Lunt M, McAteer H, Ntais D, Parisi R, Pearce C, Rutter M, Symmons D, Young H, Griffiths CEM. Identifying and managing psoriasis-associated comorbidities: the IMPACT research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/lvuq5853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Psoriasis is a common, lifelong inflammatory skin disease, the severity of which can range from limited disease involving a small body surface area to extensive skin involvement. It is associated with high levels of physical and psychosocial disability and a range of comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, and it is currently incurable.
Objectives
To (1) confirm which patients with psoriasis are at highest risk of developing additional long-term conditions and identify service use and costs to patient, (2) apply knowledge about risk of comorbid disease to the development of targeted screening services to reduce risk of further disease, (3) learn how patients with psoriasis cope with their condition and about their views of service provision, (4) identify the barriers to provision of best care for patients with psoriasis and (5) develop patient self-management resources and staff training packages to improve the lives of people with psoriasis.
Design
Mixed methods including two systematic reviews, one population cohort study, one primary care screening study, one discrete choice study, four qualitative studies and three mixed-methodology studies.
Setting
Primary care, secondary care and online surveys.
Participants
People with psoriasis and health-care professionals who manage patients with psoriasis.
Results
Prevalence rates for psoriasis vary by geographical location. Incidence in the UK was estimated to be between 1.30% and 2.60%. Knowledge about the cost-effectiveness of therapies is limited because high-quality clinical comparisons of interventions have not been done or involve short-term follow-up. After adjusting for known cardiovascular risk factors, psoriasis (including severe forms) was not found to be an independent risk factor for major cardiovascular events; however, co-occurrence of inflammatory arthritis was a risk factor. Traditional risk factors were high in patients with psoriasis. Large numbers of patients with suboptimal management of known risk factors were found by screening patients in primary care. Risk information was seldom discussed with patients as part of screening consultations, meaning that a traditional screening approach may not be effective in reducing comorbidities associated with psoriasis. Gaps in training of health-care practitioners to manage psoriasis effectively were identified, including knowledge about risk factors for comorbidities and methods of facilitating behavioural change. Theory-based, high-design-quality patient materials broadened patient understanding of psoriasis and self-management. A 1-day training course based on motivational interviewing principles was effective in increasing practitioner knowledge and changing consultation styles. The primary economic analysis indicated a high level of uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis indicated some situations when the interventions may be cost-effective. The interventions need to be assessed for long-term (cost-)effectiveness.
Limitations
The duration of patient follow-up in the study of cardiovascular disease was relatively short; as a result, future studies with longer follow-up are recommended.
Conclusions
Recognition of the nature of the psoriasis and its impact, knowledge of best practice and guideline use are all limited in those most likely to provide care for the majority of patients. Patients and practitioners are likely to benefit from the provision of appropriate support and/or training that broadens understanding of psoriasis as a complex condition and incorporates support for appropriate health behaviour change. Both interventions were feasible and acceptable to patients and practitioners. Cost-effectiveness remains to be explored.
Future work
Patient support materials have been created for patients and NHS providers. A 1-day training programme with training materials for dermatologists, specialist nurses and primary care practitioners has been designed. Spin-off research projects include a national study of responses to psoriasis therapy and a global study of the prevalence and incidence of psoriasis. A new clinical service is being developed locally based on the key findings of the Identification and Management of Psoriasis Associated ComorbidiTy (IMPACT) programme.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 10, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lis Cordingley
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pauline A Nelson
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Davies
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Darren Ashcroft
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine Bundy
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Anna Chisholm
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jamie Elvidge
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Hamilton
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Hilton
- Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Karen Kane
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Alison Littlewood
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Lunt
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Dionysios Ntais
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosa Parisi
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christina Pearce
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Rutter
- Manchester Diabetes Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Deborah Symmons
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Young
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Christopher EM Griffiths
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meade O, O'Brien M, Mc Sharry J, Lawless A, Coughlan S, Hart J, Hayes C, Keyworth C, Lavoie KL, Murphy AW, Murphy P, Noone C, O'Reilly O, Health Psychology Public Advisory Panel, Byrne M. Enhancing the implementation of the Making Every Contact Count brief behavioural intervention programme in Ireland: protocol for the Making MECC Work research programme. HRB Open Res 2022; 5:6. [PMID: 35224443 PMCID: PMC8847722 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13481.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brief behavioural interventions offered by healthcare professionals to target health behavioural risk factors (e.g. physical activity, diet, smoking and drug and alcohol use) can positively impact patient health outcomes. The Irish Health Service Executive (HSE) Making Every Contact Count (MECC) Programme supports healthcare professionals to offer patients brief opportunistic behavioural interventions during routine consultations. The potential for MECC to impact public health depends on its uptake and implementation. Aim: This protocol outlines the 'Making MECC Work' research programme, a HSE/Health Behaviour Change Research Group collaboration to develop an implementation strategy to optimise uptake of MECC in Ireland. The programme will answer three research questions: (1) What determines delivery of MECC brief interventions by healthcare professionals at individual and organisational levels? (2) What are patient attitudes towards, and experiences of, receiving MECC interventions from healthcare professionals? (3) What evidence-informed implementation strategy options can be consensually developed with key stakeholders to optimise MECC implementation? Methods: In Work Package 1, we will examine determinants of MECC delivery by healthcare professionals using a multi-methods approach, including: (WP1.1) a national survey of healthcare professionals who have participated in MECC eLearning training and (WP1.2) a qualitative interview study with relevant healthcare professionals and HSE staff. In Work Package 2, we will examine patient attitudes towards, and experiences of, MECC using qualitative interviews. Work Package 3 will combine findings from Work Packages 1 and 2 using the Behaviour Change Wheel to identify and develop testable implementation strategy options (WP 3.1). Strategies will be refined and prioritised using a key stakeholder consensus process to develop a collaborative implementation blueprint to optimise and scale-up MECC (WP3.2). Discussion: Research programme outputs are expected to positively support the integration of MECC brief behaviour change interventions into the Irish healthcare system and inform the scale-up of behaviour change interventions internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oonagh Meade
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, H91 EV56, Ireland
| | - Maria O'Brien
- National Heart Programme, Integrated Care Programme for Chronic Disease, Clinical Design and Innovation, Office of the Chief Clinical Officer, Health Services Executive, Áras Sláinte, Wilton Road, Cork, T12 XRR0, Ireland
| | - Jenny Mc Sharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, H91 EV56, Ireland
| | - Agatha Lawless
- Health & Wellbeing, Strategy and Research, Healthcare Strategy, c/o Health Promotion and Improvement Office, Health Service Executive, Waterford, X91 T256, Ireland
| | - Sandra Coughlan
- Strategic Planning and Transformation, Health Service Executive, Cork, T12 WP62, Ireland
| | - Jo Hart
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Catherine Hayes
- Public Health and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dubin, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland
| | - Chris Keyworth
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Kim L Lavoie
- Montréal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, QC H4J 1C5, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, QC H2L 2C4, Canada
| | - Andrew W Murphy
- Health Research Board Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, School of Medicine, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patrick Murphy
- Health Research Board Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, School of Medicine, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Chris Noone
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, H91 EV56, Ireland
| | - Orlaith O'Reilly
- Health and Wellbeing Division, HSE South East, Public Health Department, Health Service Executive, Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - Health Psychology Public Advisory Panel
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, H91 EV56, Ireland
- National Heart Programme, Integrated Care Programme for Chronic Disease, Clinical Design and Innovation, Office of the Chief Clinical Officer, Health Services Executive, Áras Sláinte, Wilton Road, Cork, T12 XRR0, Ireland
- Health & Wellbeing, Strategy and Research, Healthcare Strategy, c/o Health Promotion and Improvement Office, Health Service Executive, Waterford, X91 T256, Ireland
- Strategic Planning and Transformation, Health Service Executive, Cork, T12 WP62, Ireland
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Public Health and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dubin, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
- Montréal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, QC H4J 1C5, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, QC H2L 2C4, Canada
- Health Research Board Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, School of Medicine, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Health and Wellbeing Division, HSE South East, Public Health Department, Health Service Executive, Kilkenny, Ireland
| | - Molly Byrne
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, H91 EV56, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iskandar IYK, Lunt M, Thorneloe RJ, Cordingley L, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM. Alcohol misuse is associated with poor response to systemic therapies for psoriasis: findings from a prospective multicentre cohort study. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:952-960. [PMID: 34128222 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Factors that might influence response to systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis are varied, and generally, are poorly understood, aside from high bodyweight, suggesting that other unidentified factors may be relevant in determining response to treatment. The impact of alcohol misuse on treatment response has not been previously investigated. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether alcohol misuse is associated with poor response to treatment for psoriasis. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study in which response to systemic therapies was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). The CAGE (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye opener) questionnaire was used to screen for alcohol misuse. A multivariable factional polynomial linear regression model was used to examine factors associated with change in PASI between baseline and follow-up. RESULTS The cohort comprised 266 patients (biologic cohort, n = 134; conventional systemic cohort, n = 132). For the entire cohort, the median (interquartile range) PASI improved from 13 (10·0-18·3) at baseline to 3 (1·0-7·5) during follow-up. A higher CAGE score [regression coefficient: 1·40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·04-2·77]; obesity (1·84, 95% CI 0·48-3·20); and receiving a conventional systemic rather than a biologic therapy (4·39, 95% CI 2·84-5·95) were significantly associated with poor response to treatment; whereas a higher baseline PASI (-0·83, 95% CI -0·92 to -0·74) was associated with a better response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS The poor response to therapy associated with alcohol misuse and obesity found in people with psoriasis calls for lifestyle behaviour change interventions and support as part of routine clinical care. Targeting interventions to prevent, detect and manage alcohol misuse among people with psoriasis is needed to minimize adverse health consequences and improve treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Y K Iskandar
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M Lunt
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R J Thorneloe
- Centre for Behavioural Science & Applied Psychology, Department of Psychology, Sociology & Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - L Cordingley
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C E M Griffiths
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D M Ashcroft
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
When primary care providers and smokers meet: a systematic review and metasynthesis. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2021; 31:31. [PMID: 34075057 PMCID: PMC8169673 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-021-00245-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary Care Providers (PCPs) often deal with patients on daily clinical practice without knowing anything about their smoking status and willingness to quit. The aim of this metasynthesis is to explore the PCPs and patients who are smokers perspectives regarding the issue of smoking cessation within primary care settings. It relies on the model of meta-ethnography and follows thematic synthesis procedures. Twenty-two studies are included, reporting on the view of 580 participants. Three main themes emerge: (i) What lacks, (ii) Some expectations but no request, and (iii) How to address the issue and induce patients' motivation. Our results reveal a global feeling of a lack of legitimacy among PCPs when it comes to addressing the issue of tobacco and smoking cessation with their patients, even though they have developed creative strategies based on what is at the core of their practice, that is proximity, continuity, long-term and trustworthy relationship.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bull ER, Dale H. Improving community health and social care practitioners' confidence, perceived competence and intention to use behaviour change techniques in health behaviour change conversations. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2021; 29:270-283. [PMID: 32643231 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Community health and social care practitioners play an increasingly important role in the health promotion agenda, but lack confidence in having effective health behaviour change (HBC) conversations with members of the public. This study reports the development and evaluation of a training intervention based on health psychology to improve health and social care practitioner self-rated confidence, competence and intention to use five behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in their HBC conversations. A 2-day behavioural science interprofessional skills training course plus online learning module was designed for health and social care staff across North East Scotland, teaching five evidence-based BCTs (e.g. Action Planning), plus person-centred communication skills. Participants rated confidence, competence and future intention to use the BCTs on likert scales (1-10) pre-course and post-course, and provided acceptability data. 177 participants aged 20-64 took part, qualitative and quantitative data suggested that the course had high acceptability. Paired samples t tests (n = 120 with complete data) showed significant improvements in confidence, competence and intention following the course, which remained significant with a conservative analysis (n = 174) assuming no change for missing data. Perceived competence in Action Planning increased most during the course (mean change 3.09). In conclusion, health psychology-based skills training can improve practitioner confidence, competence and intention to use evidence-based BCTs; further evaluation is needed to assess practice change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor R Bull
- Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- Psychology Services, NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hannah Dale
- Psychology Services, NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ismail D, McAteer H, Majeed-Ariss R, McPhee M, Griffiths CEM, Young HS. Research priorities and identification of a health-service delivery model for psoriasis from the UK Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership. Clin Exp Dermatol 2020; 46:276-285. [PMID: 32748405 DOI: 10.1111/ced.14407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis impacts the health and psychosocial functioning of patients, conferring a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. There remain unmet needs in psoriasis care, which if addressed by research, could improve clinical outcomes. AIM To research priorities and identify a health service delivery model from the UK Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership (PsPSP). METHODS Between July 2017 and November 2018, we invited people with lived experience of psoriasis and healthcare professionals to (i) identify unmet needs, and (ii) prioritize the order in which these should be addressed by research. We collaborated with the Psoriasis Association and used methodology established by the James Lind Alliance, which pioneers the joint setting of research priorities by patients and clinicians worldwide. RESULTS In our initial harvesting survey (Survey 1), 2133 questions were submitted by 805 individuals. Submissions that had not been answered by research (true uncertainties) were supplemented with evidence gaps from systematic reviews/guidelines published in the previous 5 years and refined to produce 55 indicative questions. Voting in Survey 2, by 1154 individuals, enabled a shortlist of questions, which were prioritized during the final workshop to produce a top 20 list of research questions. Submissions on health service delivery (5.8% of the total submissions), which were analysed separately, described a blueprint for psoriasis care. CONCLUSIONS The PsPSP will inform the translational research agenda, ensuring that future research is relevant for the needs of people with psoriasis and those who manage the disease. Submissions on health service delivery describe a model of holistic, patient-focused care providing high-quality, effective management for patients with psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ismail
- Department of Dermatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Stott Lane, Manchester, UK
| | - H McAteer
- Psoriasis Association, Northampton, UK
| | - R Majeed-Ariss
- Centre for Dermatology Research, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M McPhee
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, King's Meadow Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - C E M Griffiths
- Department of Dermatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Stott Lane, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Dermatology Research, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - H S Young
- Department of Dermatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Stott Lane, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Dermatology Research, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Albert FA, Crowe MJ, Malau-Aduli AEO, Malau-Aduli BS. Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review of The Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E4358. [PMID: 32570715 PMCID: PMC7345303 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Physical activity (PA) is a cost-effective and non-pharmacological foundation for the prevention and management of chronic and complex diseases. Healthcare professionals could be viable conduits for PA promotion. However, the evidence regarding the effectiveness and benefits of the current forms of PA promotion are inconclusive. Healthcare professionals' perceptions on key determinants impact on the optimum promotion of PA were explored in this review. Thirty-four (34) studies were identified after systematically searching seven databases for peer-reviewed articles published within the last decade. PA advice or counselling was the most recorded form of PA promotion, limited counselling time was the most reported obstacle while providing incentives was viewed as a key facilitator. There is widespread consensus among healthcare professionals (HCPs) on some aspects of PA promotion. Utilisation of all PA promotional pathways to their full potential could be an essential turning point towards the optimal success of PA promotional goals. Hence, strategies are required to broaden chronic disease treatment methods to include preventive and integrative PA promotion approaches particularly, between frontline HCPs (e.g., GPs) and PA specialists (e.g., EPs). Future studies could explore the functionality of GP to EP referral pathways to determining what currently works and areas requiring further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis A. Albert
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia;
| | - Melissa J. Crowe
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia;
| | - Aduli E. O. Malau-Aduli
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia;
| | - Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, Calam R, Armitage CJ. Perceptions of receiving behaviour change interventions from GPs during routine consultations: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233399. [PMID: 32437462 PMCID: PMC7241720 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
General Practitioners (GPs) are expected to provide patients with health behaviour change interventions, yet little is known about the views of patients themselves. We aimed to understand recent patients': (1) general expectations about GPs delivering health behaviour change interventions during routine consultations (including perceptions of appropriateness and helpfulness for receiving interventions), (2) perceptions of responsibility for GPs to talk about health behaviours, and (3) experiences of receiving behaviour change interventions. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who had recently attended a routine GP consultation. Data were analysed thematically. Three major themes were identified: (1) acceptability of discussions about behaviour change, (2) establishing clinician-patient rapport, and (3) healthcare professionals as a credible source and well placed to offer behaviour change interventions. Most patients were positive about, and were willing to accept behaviour change interventions from their GP during a routine consultation. Although behaviour change was perceived as a sensitive topic for patients, the doctor-patient relationship was perceived to provide an effective platform to discuss behaviour change, with the GP perceived as an appropriate and important healthcare professional from whom to receive advice. Contrary to the views of GPs, behaviour change interventions were perceived by patients as appropriate and helpful during routine medical consultations, particularly where behaviour change could have a positive effect on long-term condition management. Behaviour change interventions delivered by GPs during routine consultations could be used effectively in time-restricted consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Keyworth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tracy Epton
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Goldthorpe
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Calam
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher J. Armitage
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Larsen M, Strumse Y, Borge C, Osborne R, Andersen M, Wahl A. Health literacy: a new piece of the puzzle in psoriasis care? A cross‐sectional study. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:1506-1516. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M.H. Larsen
- Department of Health Sciences Institute of Health and Society Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo OsloNorway
| | - Y.A.S. Strumse
- Section for Climate Therapy Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - C.R. Borge
- Department of Health Sciences Institute of Health and Society Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo OsloNorway
- Department of Patient Safety and Research at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital OsloNorway
| | - R. Osborne
- Deakin University Faculty of Health School of Health and Social Development Geelong VICAustralia
| | - M.H. Andersen
- Department of Health Sciences Institute of Health and Society Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo OsloNorway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - A.K. Wahl
- Department of Health Sciences Institute of Health and Society Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo OsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu Y, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Zong S, Tian Y, Chen S, Li M, Liu H, Zhang Q, Jing X, Sun B, Wang H, Sun T, Yang C. Therapeutic effects of lentinan on inflammatory bowel disease and colitis-associated cancer. J Cell Mol Med 2019; 23:750-760. [PMID: 30472806 PMCID: PMC6349230 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the therapeutic potential of lentinan in mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colitis-associated cancer (CAC). Lentinan decreased the disease activity index and macroscopic and microscopic colon tissue damage in dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced or TNBS-induced models of colitis. High-dose lentinan was more effective than salicylazosulfapyridine in the mouse models of colitis. Lentinan decreased the number of tumours, inflammatory cell infiltration, atypical hyperplasia and nuclear atypia in azoxymethane/DSS-induced CAC model. It also decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-13 and CD30L, in IBD and CAC model mice possibly by inhibiting Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/NF-κB signalling and the expression of colon cancer markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 8, CK18 and p53, in CAC model mice. In addition, lentinan restored the intestinal bacterial microbiotal community structure in IBD model mice. Thus, it shows therapeutic potential in IBD and CAC model mice possibly by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB signalling-mediated inflammatory responses and disruption of the intestinal microbiotal structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanrong Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,Drug Safety Evaluation CenterTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina
| | - Jianmin Zhao
- Department of PathologyHospital of Shun Yi DistrictBeijingChina
| | - Yali Zhao
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Shumin Zong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Yixuan Tian
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Shuang Chen
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina
| | - Meng Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Huijuan Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Xueshuang Jing
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina
| | - Bo Sun
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Tao Sun
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Cheng Yang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug ResearchTianjin International Joint Academy of BiomedicineTianjinChina,State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shared Decision Making in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol 2019; 20:13-29. [PMID: 30324563 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0390-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with psoriasis face numerous treatment and self-management decisions. Shared decision making is a novel approach where patients' preferences and values are considered in cooperation with healthcare professionals before making treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review was to explore what is illuminated in psoriasis research regarding shared decision making, and to estimate the effects of shared decision-making interventions in this context. METHODS Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies were eligible for inclusion. We searched six electronic databases up to January 2018. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and quality criteria. The SPIDER framework was used to identify eligibility criteria for study inclusion. Narrative and thematic syntheses were utilized to identify prominent themes emerging from the data. RESULTS A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Of these, we included 18 studies (19 papers) to describe what was illuminated with regard to shared decision making in psoriasis research. Four major themes emerged: interpersonal communication; exchange of competence and knowledge; different world view; and involvement and preference, organized under two analytical themes; "Co-creation of decisions" and "Organization of treatment and treatment needs". For shared decision-making effects, we included four controlled studies. These varied in scope and interventional length and showed limited use of shared decision making-specific outcome measures, reflecting the early stage of the literature. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-synthesis was not justified. CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a need to strengthen the relationship between medical doctors and patients with psoriasis. The evident lack of knowledge about each other's competence and the lack of self-efficacy for both patients and providers challenges the basic principles of shared decision making. The effects of shared decision making in psoriasis are inconclusive, and more research appears necessary to determine the possible benefits of shared decision-making interventions.
Collapse
|
20
|
Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, Calam R, Armitage CJ. Are healthcare professionals delivering opportunistic behaviour change interventions? A multi-professional survey of engagement with public health policy. Implement Sci 2018; 13:122. [PMID: 30241557 PMCID: PMC6151030 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0814-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Making Every Contact Count" (MECC), a public health policy in the UK, compels healthcare professionals to deliver opportunistic health behaviour change interventions to patients during routine medical consultations. Professionals' awareness of, and engagement with, the policy is unclear. This study examined (1) awareness of the MECC policy, and (2) the prevalence of MECC-related practice in relation to (a) perceived patient benefit, (b) how often healthcare professionals deliver interventions during routine consultations, and (c) the time spent on this activity. METHODS Cross-sectional national survey was administered in 2017 of 1387 healthcare professionals working in the UK's National Health Service (NHS). Descriptive statistics were used to assess awareness and practice consistent with the MECC policy. Chi-square was used to gauge the potential representativeness of our sample compared to NHS employment data. RESULTS 31.4% of healthcare professionals reported having heard of the policy; nevertheless, healthcare professionals perceived a need to provide patients with opportunistic behaviour change interventions in 55.9% (32,946/58,906) of consultations. However, healthcare professionals did not deliver interventions on 50.0% of occasions in which they perceived a need. Where behaviour change interventions were delivered to patients, this constituted 35.3% of the appointment time. CONCLUSIONS Policy makers must address the gap between the proportion of patients that healthcare professionals perceive would benefit from opportunistic behaviour change interventions and those receiving them (an estimated 50.0%; 16,473 additional patients could have benefited). Future research should consider how healthcare professionals identify patients who might benefit from opportunistic behaviour change interventions and developing training for efficient delivery of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Keyworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Coupland 1 Building-Room G3, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Joanna Goldthorpe
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rachel Calam
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Christopher J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Warren RB, Marsden A, Tomenson B, Mason KJ, Soliman MM, Burden AD, Reynolds NJ, Stocken D, Emsley R, Griffiths CEM, Smith C. Identifying demographic, social and clinical predictors of biologic therapy effectiveness in psoriasis: a multicentre longitudinal cohort study. Br J Dermatol 2018; 180:1069-1076. [PMID: 30155885 PMCID: PMC6519065 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. However, for reasons largely unknown, many patients do not respond or lose response to these drugs. Objectives To evaluate demographic, social and clinical factors that could be used to predict effectiveness and stratify response to biologic therapies in psoriasis. Methods Using a multicentre, observational, prospective pharmacovigilance study (BADBIR), we identified biologic‐naive patients starting biologics with outcome data at 6 (n = 3079) and 12 (n = 3110) months. Associations between 31 putative predictors and outcomes were investigated in univariate and multivariable regression analyses. Potential stratifiers of treatment response were investigated with statistical interactions. Results Eight factors associated with reduced odds of achieving ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at 6 months were identified (described as odds ratio and 95% confidence interval): demographic (female sex, 0·78, 0·66–0·93); social (unemployment, 0·67, 0·45–0·99); unemployment due to ill health (0·62, 0·48–0·82); ex‐ and current smoking (0·81, 0·66–0·99 and 0·79, 0·63–0·99, respectively); clinical factors (high weight, 0·99, 0·99–0·99); psoriasis of the palms and/or soles (0·75, 0·61–0·91); and presence of small plaques only compared with small and large plaques (0·78, 0·62–0·96). White ethnicity (1·48, 1·12–1·97) and higher baseline PASI (1·04, 1·03–1·04) were associated with increased odds of achieving PASI 90. The findings were largely consistent at 12 months. There was little evidence for predictors of differential treatment response. Conclusions Psoriasis phenotype and potentially modifiable factors are associated with poor outcomes with biologics, underscoring the need for lifestyle management. Effect sizes suggest that these factors alone cannot inform treatment selection. What's already known about this topic? Biologic therapy used in the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis differs in its effectiveness across patients. Previous research has indicated that patients with a higher body mass index, who smoke or who have smoked, and with a lower baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) are less likely to have a good outcome with biologic therapy for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.
What does this study add? This large‐scale study in a real‐world setting confirms that weight, smoking status and baseline PASI are associated with effectiveness of biologic therapy. There is evidence that non‐white ethnicity, female sex, unemployment, psoriasis of the palms and soles and the presence of small chronic plaques are associated with poor outcomes with biologics. There is some evidence that men have a comparatively worse response to etanercept, relative to adalimumab, than women. Otherwise, most factors do not appear to be predictors of differential treatment response.
Respond to this article
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R B Warren
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - A Marsden
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - B Tomenson
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - K J Mason
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K
| | - M M Soliman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - A D Burden
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K
| | - N J Reynolds
- Dermatological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle University, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre and Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
| | - D Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
| | - R Emsley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, U.K
| | - C E M Griffiths
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - C Smith
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Keyworth C, Nelson PA, Bundy C, Pye SR, Griffiths CEM, Cordingley L. Does message framing affect changes in behavioural intentions in people with psoriasis? A randomized exploratory study examining health risk communication. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2018; 23:763-778. [PMID: 29380626 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1427876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Message framing is important in health communication research to encourage behaviour change. Psoriasis, a long-term inflammatory skin condition, has additional comorbidities including high levels of anxiety and cardiovascular disease (CVD), making message framing particularly important. This experimental study aimed to: (1) identify whether health messages about psoriasis presented as either gain- or loss-framed were more effective for prompting changes in behavioural intentions (BI), (2) examine whether BI were driven by a desire to improve psoriasis or reduce CVD risk; (3) examine emotional reactions to message frame; and (4) examine predictors of BI. A two by two experiment examined the effects on BI of message frame (loss vs. gain) and message focus (psoriasis symptom reduction vs. CVD risk reduction). Participants with psoriasis (n = 217) were randomly allocated to one of four evidence-based health messages related to either smoking, alcohol, diet or physical activity, using an online questionnaire. BI was the primary outcome. Analysis of variance tests and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted. A significant frame by focus interaction was found for BI to reduce alcohol intake (p = .023); loss-framed messages were more effective for CVD risk reduction information, whilst gain-framed messages were more effective for psoriasis symptom reduction information. Message framing effects were not found for BI for increased physical activity and improving diet. High CVD risk was a significant predictor of increased BI for both alcohol reduction (β = .290, p < .01) and increased physical activity (β = -.231, p < .001). Message framing may be an important factor to consider depending on the health benefit emphasised (disease symptom reduction or CVD risk reduction) and patient-stated priorities. Condition-specific health messages in psoriasis populations may increase the likelihood of message effectiveness for alcohol reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Keyworth
- a Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| | - P A Nelson
- b Centre for Dermatology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.,c NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| | - C Bundy
- d School of Healthcare Sciences , Cardiff University , Cardiff , UK
| | - S R Pye
- e Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| | - C E M Griffiths
- b Centre for Dermatology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.,c NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.,f Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , UK
| | - L Cordingley
- c NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.,g Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nelson PA, Kane K, Pearce CJ, Bundy C, Chisholm A, Hilton R, Thorneloe R, Young H, Griffiths CEM, Cordingley L. 'New to me': changing patient understanding of psoriasis and identifying mechanisms of change. The Pso Well ® patient materials mixed-methods feasibility study. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:758-770. [PMID: 28403510 PMCID: PMC5637913 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Psoriasis is an inflammatory long‐term condition involving comorbidities, unhealthy lifestyle and significant life impact. Patients’ understanding of psoriasis is limited and support lacking. The Common‐Sense Model of Self‐Regulation of Health and Illness emphasizes the role of illness and treatment beliefs on coping and self‐management. New ‘Pso Well®’ patient materials informed by the model, addressed psoriasis as a long‐term condition, medication management and lifestyle behaviours. Objectives To investigate whether Pso Well® materials (i) broaden understanding of psoriasis without increasing anxiety; (ii) are acceptable; and (iii) comprise features that appear to effect change. Methods The Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ‐R modified) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were administered in patients before and after intervention. Numerical rating scales assessed perceptions of change in understanding and anxiety resulting from engagement with the materials. Qualitative interviews explored acceptability and perceived ‘active ingredients’. Results Fifty‐five patients completed pre‐ and postintervention questionnaires (56% female; median age 59 years). Postintervention, a large effect size was indicated in two IPQ‐R domains – illness coherence [t(55) = −3·48, P = 0·001 (two‐tailed), η2 = 0·19] and personal control [t(55) = −2·98, P = 0·004 (two‐tailed), η2 = 0·14] – and a medium effect in one, treatment control [t(55) = −2·08, P = 0·042 (two‐tailed), η2 = 0·08]. HADS scores did not change. For numerical rating scales, 80% of participants reported increased understanding of psoriasis and none reported increased anxiety. Interviews with 19 patients indicated the materials were acceptable and usable. Factors reported to broaden understanding and promote engagement with self‐management included linking of related disease aspects, personally relevant content and high‐quality design. Conclusions High‐quality, theory‐based psoriasis materials are acceptable to patients and can improve understanding and sense of control without increasing anxiety. What's already known about this topic? Psoriasis is associated with comorbidities, unhealthy lifestyle and significant life impact. Patients’ understanding of psoriasis is limited, self‐management support is lacking and disengagement from healthcare services is common.
What does this study add? The new, theory‐informed Pso Well® patient materials address psoriasis as a long‐term condition; medications management and lifestyle behaviour. The Pso Well® patient materials can increase understanding of psoriasis, promote feelings of self‐worth and encourage a desire to engage in self‐management and behaviour change, without increasing anxiety or depression.
What are the clinical implications of this work? The Pso Well® patient materials could support clinical consultations by helping patients recognize the remitting–relapsing nature of psoriasis. This will help to improve understanding of the disease, as well as providing a clearer rationale for treatment adherence and lifestyle behaviour change.
Linked Comment: Prinsen. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:616–617
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Nelson
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - K Kane
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - C J Pearce
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K
| | - C Bundy
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K
| | - A Chisholm
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K
| | - R Hilton
- Bridgewater Community Healthcare Trust, Wigan, U.K
| | - R Thorneloe
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K
| | - H Young
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, U.K
| | - C E M Griffiths
- Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, U.K
| | - L Cordingley
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.,Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chisholm A, Nelson P, Pearce C, Littlewood A, Kane K, Henry A, Thorneloe R, Hamilton M, Lavallee J, Lunt M, Griffiths C, Cordingley L, Bundy C. Motivational interviewing-based training enhances clinicians’ skills and knowledge in psoriasis: findings from the Pso Well®
study. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:677-686. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Chisholm
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - P.A. Nelson
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - C.J. Pearce
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - A.J. Littlewood
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - K. Kane
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - A.L. Henry
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - R. Thorneloe
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - M.P. Hamilton
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - J. Lavallee
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - M. Lunt
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - C.E.M. Griffiths
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester U.K
| | - L. Cordingley
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | - C. Bundy
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology; University of Manchester; Manchester U.K
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rutter MK, Kane K, Lunt M, Cordingley L, Littlewood A, Young HS, Chew-Graham CA, Hilton R, Symmons DPM, Griffiths CEM. Primary care-based screening for cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2016; 175:348-56. [PMID: 26990294 PMCID: PMC5113692 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Studies assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in patients with psoriasis have been limited by selection bias, inappropriate controls or a reliance on data collected for clinical reasons. Objectives To investigate whether screening for CVD risk factors in patients with psoriasis in primary care augments the known prevalence of CVD risk factors in a cross‐sectional study. Methods Patients listed as having psoriasis in primary care were recruited, screened and risk assessed by QRISK2. Results In total, 287 patients attended (mean age 53 years, 57% women, 94% white British, 22% severe disease, 33% self‐reported psoriatic arthritis). The proportion with known and screen‐detected (previously unknown) risk factors was as follows: hypertension 35% known and 13% screen‐detected; hypercholesterolaemia 32% and 37%; diabetes 6·6% and 3·1% and chronic kidney disease 1·1% and 4·5%. At least one screen‐detected risk factor was found in 48% and two or more risk factors were found in 21% of patients. One in three patients (37%) not previously known to be at high risk were found to have a high (> 10%) 10‐year CVD risk. Among the participants receiving treatment for known CVD risk factors, nearly half had suboptimal levels for blood pressure (46%) and cholesterol (46%). Conclusions Cardiovascular risk factor screening of primary care‐based adults with psoriasis identified a high proportion of patients (i) at high CVD risk, (ii) with screen‐detected risk factors and (iii) with suboptimally managed known risk factors. These findings need to be considered alongside reports that detected limited responses of clinicians to identified risk factors before universal CVD screening can be recommended. What's already known about this topic? Several studies have suggested that patients with psoriasis have a greater number of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and a higher risk for vascular events compared with the general population. However, the prevalence data used to support systematic CVD risk factor screening in psoriasis have been limited by selection bias, inappropriate choice of control groups or reliance on risk factors measured for other clinical reasons.
What does this study add? Cardiovascular risk factor screening of primary care‐based adults with psoriasis identified a high proportion of patients (i) at high CVD risk, (ii) with screen‐detected risk factors and (iii) with suboptimally managed known risk factors. These findings need to be considered alongside reports that detected limited responses of clinicians to identified risk factors before universal CVD screening can be recommended.
Plain language summary available online
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Rutter
- The Endocrinology and Diabetes Research Group, Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Diabetes Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - K Kane
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - M Lunt
- Arthritis Research U.K. Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester, U.K
| | - L Cordingley
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - A Littlewood
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - H S Young
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Centre for Dermatology Research, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| | - C A Chew-Graham
- Research Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, U.K.,South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, U.K
| | - R Hilton
- Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Wigan, U.K
| | - D P M Symmons
- Arthritis Research U.K. Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester, U.K
| | - C E M Griffiths
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.,Centre for Dermatology Research, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nelson PA. Getting under the skin: qualitative methods in dermatology research. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172:841-3. [PMID: 25827724 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P A Nelson
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research, Institute of Inflammation & Repair, University of Manchester, 1·762a Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Communicating Cardiovascular Disease Risk to People with Psoriasis: What Techniques do Practitioners Use? Int J Behav Med 2015; 23:168-78. [DOI: 10.1007/s12529-015-9517-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|