Complicated appendiceal diverticulosis versus low‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a major diagnostic dilemma

Incidence and outcomes of delayed presentation and surgery in peritoneal surface malignancies

Background

Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) present insidiously and often pose diagnostic challenges. There is a paucity of literature quantifying the frequency and extent of therapeutic delays in PSM and its impact on oncological outcomes.

Methods

A review of a prospectively maintained registry of PSM patients undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) was conducted. Causes for treatment delays were identified. We evaluate the impact of delayed presentation and treatment delays on oncological outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

319 patients underwent CRS-HIPEC over a 6-years duration. 58 patients were eventually included in this study. Mean duration between symptom onset and CRS-HIPEC was 186.0 ± 37.1 days (range 18-1494 days) and mean duration of between patient-reported symptom onset and initial presentation was 56.7 ± 16.8 days. Delayed presentation (> 60 days between symptom onset and presentation) was seen in 20.7% (n=12) of patients and 50.0% (n=29) experienced a significant treatment delay of > 90 days between 1^st presentation and CRS-HIPEC. Common causes for treatment delays were healthcare provider-related i.e. delayed or inappropriate referrals (43.1%) and delayed presentation to care (31.0%). Delayed presentation was a significantly associated with poorer disease free survival (DFS) (HR 4.67, 95% CI 1.11-19.69, p=0.036).

Conclusion

Delayed presentation and treatment delays are common and may have an impact on oncological outcomes. There is an urgent need to improve patient education and streamline healthcare delivery processes in the management of PSM.

A case of diverticulum of the appendiceal base resembling a submucosal tumor of the cecum under colonoscopy: a hitherto undescribed lesion

BACKGROUND

Diverticulosis of the appendix is an uncommon clinical entity, and a preoperative diagnosis is often difficult. Herein we report an unusual case of appendiceal diverticulosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old male was referred to our hospital to examine the cause of hematochezia. A colonoscopy study showed a protruding lesion resembling a submucosal tumor (SMT), approximately 20 mm in diameter, at the site around the appendiceal orifice of the cecum. An abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a cystic lesion at the appendiceal base. The lesion was clinically diagnosed as a cystic tumor of the appendix, but the possibility of a malignant tumor could not be excluded. Therefore, a laparoscopic ileocecal resection with lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological examination of the resected specimen revealed that the lesion was a diverticulum (pseudodiverticulum) occurring solitarily at the appendiceal base, in which the mucosal layer of the appendix was invaginated into the submucosa of the adjacent cecum, thus forming an SMT-like lesion.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case report in the English literature showing that an appendiceal diverticulum can manifest as an SMT-like lesion in the cecum. This condition should be recognized as a differential diagnosis for such lesions.

Significance of the Entire Appendiceal Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Serrated Lesions, Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm, and Appendiceal Diverticulosis Disease

Objective

This study was conducted in order to investigate the significance of the entire appendiceal evaluation in the pathological diagnosis of appendiceal serrated lesions, low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), and appendiceal diverticulosis disease (ADD).

Methods

A total of 702 appendectomy specimens diagnosed from 2017 to 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The specimens were divided into two groups according to the different sampling procedures. In group 1, the vast majority of 337 specimens were partially submitted by routine sampling within 18 months from October 2017 to March 2019. In group 2, 365 of specimens were entirely submitted and examined within 18 months from April 2019 to October 2020. The incidence and pathological features of serrated lesions, LAMN, and ADD in the two groups were compared and analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics between different entities were also studied.

Results

Forty appendiceal serrated lesions, 8 LAMNs, and 21 diverticula were accidentally detected in 702 appendectomy specimens. As compared with group 1, the incidence of appendiceal serrated lesions in group 2 was significantly increased (9.3% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.01), especially for the serrated lesions without dysplasia (7.4% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.01). The entire sampling revealed that loss of lamina propria and replacement with dysplastic mucinous epithelium were statistically significantly associated with LAMN rather than serrated lesions and ADD (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Mural mucin deposition and fibrosis were useful features to distinguish LAMN from simple serrated lesions (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), but mucin deposition was useless for the distinction between LAMN and ADD (P > 0.05) or serrated lesions combined with ADD.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the importance and necessity of careful gross assessment and histologic examination of the entire appendectomy specimen, since the association with unexpected appendiceal lesions is significant and cannot be ignored. The entirely submitted appendix is more sensitive for the detection of appendiceal serrated lesions. In addition, thorough examination and evaluation are essential to distinguish the key pathological features between appendiceal serrated lesions, LAMN, and ADD.

LAMN as a differential diagnosis for abdominal pain: a case report from Syria

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are papillary or flat mucinous tumors with low-grade cytologic atypia found in &lt;0.3% of appendectomy specimens among older population. They are the most frequent source of pseudomyxoma peritonei. They can be easily misdiagnosed, due to unspecific symptoms, with acute appendicitis, retroperitoneal tumors or adnexal mass. Macroscopically, the appendix may appear normal or be variably dilated. Microscopic study determines whether the studied specimen is LAMN or mucinous adenocarcinomas. We report a 77-year-old patient presented with 15-day abdominal pain accompanied with chills and hyperthermia. Decision was made for right hemicolectomy as a result of the findings on ultrasound and computed tomography scan. Diagnosis was made after the pathologic study, which revealedLAMN.

Controversies in appendiceal pathology: Mucinous and goblet cell neoplasms

Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinomas and mucinous neoplasms are uncommon compared with other epithelial tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Both tumour types have been subjected to terminology that belies their biological risk and leads to confusion. Goblet cell adenocarcinomas display patchy staining for endocrine markers and, thus, were previously classified as goblet cell carcinoids. Unlike well-differentiated endocrine neoplasms, however, they often contain high-grade glandular elements and pursue an aggressive course akin to that of conventional adenocarcinoma. Although several authors have recently proposed grading schemes to predict behaviour among goblet cell neoplasms, most that contain high-grade components have already spread beyond the appendix at the time of diagnosis, whereas those confined to the appendix almost always have low-grade features; the added value of grading these tumours is limited. Contradictions also surround the nomenclature of mucinous neoplasms. The World Health Organization and others promote non-malignant terminology to describe metastatic mucinous neoplasms of the peritoneum and eliminate a benign category entirely, even though virtually all neoplasms confined to the appendix pose no recurrence risk following appendectomy. 'Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm' now encompasses a spectrum of benign tumours and malignant neoplasms in the appendix and peritoneum. Although using an umbrella term in this fashion simplifies the roles of pathologists, it provides essentially no actionable information beyond that which is already clinically apparent. Broad strokes nomenclature also ensures that many patients with no risk of recurrence will receive unnecessary surveillance while others will undergo inappropriate surgical procedures due to lapses in communication. Moreover, a surprising number of non-neoplastic mucinous lesions are misclassified as low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, which can result in unwarranted patient concern or even mismanagement. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the literature and describe an approach to appendiceal neoplasms that more clearly denotes their biologic risk.

The Frontiers of Appendiceal Controversies: Mucinous Neoplasms and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms show a range of morphologic features and biological risk. At one end of the spectrum, high-grade adenocarcinomas are cytologically malignant with infiltrative invasion, lymph node metastases, and behavior similar to that of extra-appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinomas. At the other end, mucinous neoplasms confined to the mucosa are uniformly benign. Some cases lying between these extremes have potential risk to metastasize within the abdomen despite a lack of malignant histologic features. They show "diverticulum-like," pushing invasion of mostly low-grade epithelium through the appendix with, or without, concomitant organizing intra-abdominal mucin. The latter condition, widely termed "pseudomyxoma peritonei," tends to pursue a relentless course punctuated by multiple recurrences despite cytoreductive therapy, culminating in death for many patients. The combination of bland histologic features and protracted behavior of peritoneal disease has led some authors to question whether these metastatic tumors even represent malignancies. The World Health Organization and its cadre of experts widely promote usage of "low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm" as an umbrella term to encompass benign and malignant conditions, as well as those that have uncertain biological potential. Although this practice greatly simplifies tumor classification, it causes confusion and consternation among pathologists, clinical colleagues, and patients. It also increases the likelihood that at least some patients will undergo unnecessary surveillance for, and treatment of, benign neoplasms and non-neoplastic conditions. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the relevant literature and discuss a practical approach to classifying appendiceal mucinous neoplasms that more closely approximates their biological risk.

Updated staging and patient outcomes in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) exhibit drastically different clinical course and prognosis depending on tumor stage, particularly as it relates to the extent and cellularity of peritoneal involvement. In this context, recent changes in staging guidelines have sought to clarify criteria for pT and pM categories. This study's aim was to identify clinicopathological features associated with patient outcomes, especially as they pertain to updated stage groups. We reviewed LAMNs from 192 patients (mean age: 56.9 years, 119 (62.0%) women). The tumors consisted of 66 (34.4%) pTisM0, 16 (8.3%) pT3M0, 16 (8.3%) pT4aM0, 27 (14.1%) pTxM1a, and 67 (34.9%) pTxM1b cases. In multivariate analysis, only gross perforation was significantly associated with higher TNM group stage (p = 0.001; OR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.7-6.4). Of 165 (85.9%) patients with clinical follow-up, 51 (30.9%) had disease progression (over a mean 33.7 months, range: 4.7-121.7), whereas over significantly longer follow-up (mean 48.7 months, range: 3.1-143.9; p = 0.004), 114 (69.1%) patients did not. In multivariate analysis, higher TNM stage was significantly associated with disease progression (p = 0.029; OR 18.3, 95% CI: 1.4-246.0). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, none of 74 patients with disease limited to the appendix (pM0), 6 of 27 (22.2%) cases with peritoneal involvement by acellular mucin only (pM1a), and 45 of 64 (70.3%) tumors with intraperitoneal deposits containing neoplastic cells (pM1b) showed disease progression (p < 0.001). These differences in progression-free survival among TNM groups persisted when limiting the analysis to patients who had undergone successful cytoreductive surgery (p = 0.050). Finally, in four patients (all with pM1b disease) death was attributed to disease progression whereas there was no disease-specific mortality in the pM0 and pM1a groups (p = 0.020). These data support the designation of LAMNs with acellular peritoneal mucin as having an intermediate prognosis between cases limited to the appendix and those with intraperitoneal deposits containing neoplastic epithelium.

Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) on appendectomy specimens and correlations with pseudomyxoma peritonei development risk

Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is the primary source of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). PMP may develop after seemingly complete resection of primary tumor by appendectomy, which is unpredictable due to lack of reliable prognostic indicators. We retrospectively reviewed 154 surgically resected LAMNs to explore if any of the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics may be associated with increasing risk of PMP development. Our major findings include: (1) As compared to those without PMP, the cases that developed PMP were more frequent to have (a) smaller luminal diameter (<1 cm) and thicker wall, separate mucin aggregations, and microscopic perforation/rupture, all suggestive of luminal mucin leakage; (b) microscopic acellular mucin presenting on serosal surface and not being confined to mucosa; and (c) neoplastic epithelium dissecting outward beyond mucosa, however, with similar frequency of neoplastic cells being present in muscularis propria. (2) Involvement of neoplastic cells or/and acellular mucin at surgical margin did not necessarily lead to tumor recurrence or subsequent PMP, and clear margin did not absolutely prevent PMP development. (3) Coexisting diverticulum, resulted from neoplastic or non-neoplastic mucosa being herniated through muscle-lacking vascular hiatus of appendiceal wall, was seen in a quarter of LAMN cases, regardless of PMP. The diverticular portion of tumor involvement was often the weakest point where rupture occurred. In conclusion, proper evaluation of surgical specimens with search for mucin and neoplastic cells on serosa and for microscopic perforation, which are of prognostic significance, should be emphasized.

Updates in Appendix Pathology: The Precarious Cutting Edge

Mucinous appendiceal tumors include low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, and mucinous adenocarcinoma. Nonmucinous adenocarcinomas are less frequent. Recent consensus guidelines and the latest edition of the World Health Organization classification will allow consistent use of agreed nomenclature. Accurate diagnosis is important not only for patient management but also to allow comparison of results between centers and tumor registries. Serrated polyps are the most common benign polyp in the appendix. They need to be distinguished from low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, which can also mimic other benign conditions. Goblet cell adenocarcinomas are a distinctive type of appendiceal neoplasm.

Post-inflammatory mucosal hyperplasia and appendiceal diverticula simulate features of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms

Post-inflammatory mucosal hyperplasia and appendiceal diverticulosis simulate mucinous neoplasms, causing diagnostic confusion. Distinction between neoplasia and its mimics is particularly important since many authorities now consider all appendiceal mucinous neoplasms to be potentially malignant. The purpose of this study was to identify clinicopathologic and molecular features that may distinguish appendiceal mucinous neoplasms from non-neoplastic mimics. We retrospectively identified 92 mucinous lesions confined to the right lower quadrant, including 55 non-neoplastic examples of mucosal hyperplasia and/or diverticulosis and 37 low-grade neoplasms. Presenting symptoms, radiographic findings, appendiceal diameter, appearances of the lamina propria, non-neoplastic crypts, and epithelium, as well as mural changes were recorded. Twenty non-neoplastic lesions were subjected to KRAS mutational testing. Non-neoplastic appendices were smaller (p < 0.05) and more likely to present with symptoms of appendicitis (p < 0.05) than neoplasms. While post-inflammatory mucosal hyperplasia and diverticula often showed goblet cell-rich epithelium, extruded mucin pools, and patchy mural alterations with fibrosis, they always contained non-neoplastic crypts lined by mixed epithelial cell types and separated by lamina propria with predominantly preserved wall architecture. On the other hand, mucinous neoplasms lacked normal crypts (p < 0.05) and showed decreased lamina propria (p < 0.05) with diffusely thickened muscularis mucosae and lymphoid atrophy. Six (30%) non-neoplastic lesions contained KRAS mutations, particularly those containing goblet cell-rich hyperplastic epithelium. We conclude that distinction between neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucinous appendiceal lesions requires recognition of key morphologic features; KRAS mutational testing is an unreliable biomarker that cannot be used to assess biologic risk or confirm a diagnosis of neoplasia.