Marker assessments in ER-positive breast cancers: old markers, new applications?

IL21R hypomethylation as a biomarker for distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumours

Some benign and malignant breast tumours are similar in pathological morphology, which are difficult to be distinguished in clinical diagnosis. In this study, we intended to explore novel biomarkers for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumours. Methylation EPIC 850K beadchip and RNA-sequencing were used to analyse 29 tissue samples from patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) and benign breast tumours for differently methylated and expressed genes. The altered methylation of IL21R was semi-quantitatively validated in an independent study with 566 tissue samples (279 BC vs. 287 benign breast tumours) using mass spectrometry. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between IL21R methylation and BC. BC-associated IL21R hypomethylation and overexpression were identified in the discovery round. In the validation round, BC patients presented significant IL21R hypomethylation compared to women with benign breast tumours (ORs ≥1.29 per-10% methylation, p-values ≤ 5.69E-14), and this hypomethylation was even enhanced in BC patients with ER-negative and PR-negative tumours as well as with triple-negative tumours. The methylation of IL21R showed efficient discriminatory power to distinguish benign breast tumours from BC (area under curve (AUC) = 0.88), and especially from ER-negative BC (AUC = 0.95), PR-negative BC (AUC = 0.93) and triple-negative BC (AUC = 0.96). We disclosed significant IL21R hypomethylation in patients with BC compared to women with benign breast tumours, and revealed the somatic change of DNA methylation could be a potential biomarker for molecular pathology of BC.

Cytokeratin 15 is a novel and independent predictor of poor outcome in luminal B HER2-negative breast carcinomas

Cytokeratin 15 (CK15) has been described as a stem cell marker in human organs and its expression is seen in breast tissue. CK15 expression is associated with aggressive features in endometrial and oesophageal cancers, but data on the breast are lacking. This study aims to investigate the clinicopathological associations and prognostic significance of CK15 in breast carcinomas. A multi-institute cohort of breast carcinomas were retrieved. Clinicopathological and outcome data were obtained and compared with immunohistochemical expression CK15 and a panel of biomarkers. In total, 1,476 cases were included, with an expression rate of 3.5%, preferentially expressed in luminal subtypes (p=0.024), with luminal B carcinomas being the highest (4.7%), as opposed to basal-like (1%) and HER2-overexpressed carcinomas (0%). Except for nodal stage (p=0.013) and nodal metastasis (p=0.048), oestrogen (p=0.035) and progesterone receptor (p=0.001) positivity, there were no associations with other clinicopathological parameters. A trend was observed with shorter breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in CK15-positive luminal B carcinomas (p=0.062). On further subgroup multivariate analysis of luminal B HER2-negative carcinomas, CK15 expression exhibited robust correlation with shorter BCSS (HR=9.004, p=0.001) and disease-free survival (HR=7.085, p<0.001). Restricted to luminal breast carcinomas, specifically luminal B HER2-negative, CK15 is demonstrated to be a robust independent predictor of higher risk of recurrence and shorter survival, with potential as a clinical prognostic marker and an exclusive stem cell marker for this subgroup of carcinomas.

Molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer in the era of precision oncotherapy: Current inspirations and future challenges

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most hackneyed malignancies. Even patients with identical clinical symptoms and the same TNM stage still exhibit radically different clinical outcomes after receiving equivalent treatment regimens, indicating extensive heterogeneity of CRC. Myriad molecular subtypes of CRC have been exploited for decades, including the most compelling consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification that has been broadly applied for patient stratification and biomarker-drug combination formulation. Encountering barriers to clinical translation, however, CMS classification fails to fully reflect inter- or intra-tumor heterogeneity of CRC. As a consequence, addressing heterogeneity and precisely managing CRC patients with unique characteristics remain arduous tasks for clinicians.

REVIEW

In this review, we systematically summarize molecular subtypes of CRC and further elaborate on their clinical applications, limitations, and future orientations.

CONCLUSION

In recent years, exploration of subtypes through cell lines, animal models, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), organoids, and clinical trials contributes to refining biological insights and unraveling subtype-specific therapies in CRC. Therapeutic interventions including nanotechnology, clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (CRISPR/Cas9), gut microbiome, and liquid biopsy are powerful tools with the possibility to shift the immunologic landscape and outlook for CRC precise medicine.

TRPS1 is a promising marker for all subtypes of breast cancer

AIMS

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome-1 (TRPS1) has been proposed as a novel breast marker with equally high expression in breast cancer (BC) subtypes, making it a useful diagnostic tool. Here, its expression was evaluated alongside other commonly used markers [GATA3, GCDFP15, mammaglobin (MGB) and SOX10] in a large cohort of BCs (n = 1852) and their corresponding nodal metastases. Its usefulness as a diagnostic tool and its correlation with clinicopathological features were assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TRPS1 was expressed at 75.8% overall in the BC cohort, with at least 58% expression among BC subtypes. It was less sensitive than GATA3 for luminal and HER2-overexpressing (HER2-OE) cancers (luminal A: 82 versus 97%; luminal B: 80 versus 95%; HER2-OE: 62 versus 76%), but it was the most sensitive for TNBC (60 versus ≤ 41%). It showed a stable expression in nodal metastases (primary tumour 76 versus nodal metastasis 78%), unlike a reduced nodal expression for GATA3 (86 versus 77%). TRPS1 outperformed GATA3 in detecting non-luminal cancers when paired with other breast markers. TRPS1 and GCDFP15 was the most sensitive combination in TNBC detection, with a 76% detection rate. For TRPS1-negative and GCDFP15-negative TNBCs, SOX10 was more sensitive than GATA3 (29 versus 24%).

CONCLUSIONS

TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for all breast cancer subtypes, outperforming GATA3 in non-luminal cancers and displaying the highest sensitivity for TNBC detection when combined with GCDFP15. It is a valuable addition to the breast marker panel for accurate identification of BC.

Immunocytochemical markers, molecular testing and digital cytopathology for aspiration cytology of metastatic breast carcinoma

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a versatile diagnostic procedure uniquely suited for tissue biopsy of breast carcinomas and axillary metastases and/or recurrences. With the expanding treatment options and accompanying theragnostic tests, it is crucial to recognize the developments on ancillary testing and digital cytopathology techniques related to aspiration cytology of metastatic breast carcinoma. In this review, we aim to summarize and update the evidence of immunocytochemistry, for the detection of carcinoma cells (epithelial markers), confirmation of breast primary (breast-specific markers), assessment of surrogate immunostains (hormone receptors, ki-67 proliferative index and HER2) and theragnostic biomarkers, with discussion on potential diagnostic pitfalls, followed by the application of molecular tests, and digital cytopathologic techniques for assessing metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology.

Comparison of GATA3, GCDFP15, Mammaglobin and SOX10 Immunocytochemistry in Aspirates of Metastatic Breast Cancer

Introduction: Metastatic cancers are frequently detected on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, and confirmation of metastatic breast cancer often requires immunocytochemistry. Tissue provisioning for FNA specimens is important. In this study, GATA3, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP15), mammaglobin (MMG), and SOX10 were performed on cell block preparations from aspirates of histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancers. The diagnostic performance of single markers and combinations of these markers were investigated with the aim to construct a tissue-efficient immunopanel. Methodology: Aspirates of metastatic breast cancer with corresponding histology and biomarker (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 and ki67) profile were retrieved. ER, GATA3, GCDFP15, MMG and SOX10 immunostains were performed on cell block sections and their expressions were assessed and compared. Results: Immunostaining was performed on a total of 115 aspirates. GATA3 showed the highest expression, followed by MMG, GCDFP15 and SOX10. Twenty-three, five and five cases expressed GATA3, MMG and SOX10 only. The five cases expressing SOX10 only were ER negative, and SOX10 expression was negatively associated with ER (p = 0.001), MMG (p = 0.001), GCDFP15 (p = 0.010) and GATA3 (p = 0.002), whereas GATA3 expression showed positive correlation with ER positivity (p < 0.001). MMG and GCDFP15 showed association with high Ki67 (p < 0.05), and no correlations were found with HER2 expression. Conclusion: In this cohort, GATA3 was the most sensitive single marker. The addition of MMG and SOX10 increases the sensitivity for detection of ER positive and ER negative breast cancers, respectively. These findings support the use of a combination of GATA3/MMG/SOX10 for confirmation of metastatic breast cancer.