Portal vein resection using the no-touch technique with a hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers

Backgrounds/Aims

Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021.

Methods

Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop.

Results

In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing.

Conclusions

The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Vascular reconstruction provides short-term and long-term survival benefits for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

In patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), radical resection can be achieved by resection and reconstruction of the vasculature. However, whether vascular reconstruction (VR) improves long-term and short-term prognosis has not been demonstrated comprehensively.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who received surgery for HCCA with or without VR. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified based on Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to explore the impact of VR. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used for comparisons of short-term survival between the groups. Patients' intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

Totally 447 patients were enrolled. We divided these patients into 3 groups: VR with radical resections (n = 84); non-VR radical resections (n = 309) and non-radical resection (we pooled VR-nonradical and non-VR nonradical together, n = 54). Cox regression revealed that carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for OS and RFS. There was no significant difference of RMST between the VR and non-VR radical groups within 12 months after surgery (10.18 vs. 10.76 mon, P = 0.179), although the 5-year OS (P < 0.001) and RFS (P < 0.001) were worse in the VR radical group. The incidences of most complications were not significantly different, but those of bile leakage (P < 0.001) and postoperative infection (P = 0.009) were higher in the VR radical group than in the non-VR radical group. Additionally, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) up to 7 days after surgery tended to decrease in all groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative liver failure between the VR and non-VR radical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical resection can be achieved with VR to improve the survival rate without worsening short-term survival compared with resection with non-VR. After adequate assessment of the patient's general condition, VR can be considered in the resection.

Time to surgery is not an oncological risk factor in patients with cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative-intent liver surgery

Surgical resection is the only option to achieve long-term survival in cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA). Due to limitations of health care systems and unforeseeable events, e.g., the COVID pandemic, the time from diagnosis to surgery (time-to-surgery (TTS)) has gained great interest in malignancies. Thus, we investigated whether TTS is associated with the oncological outcome in patients who underwent surgery for CCA. A cohort of 276 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic and perihilar CCA excluding individuals with neoadjuvant therapy and perioperative mortality between 2010 and 2021 were eligible for analysis. Patients were grouped according to TTS (≤ 30; 31-60; 61-90; > 90 days) and compared by Kruskal-Wallis-analysis. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and characteristics associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regressions. The median CSS was 39 months (3-year-CSS = 52%, 5-year-CSS = 42%) and the median RFS 20 months (3-year-CSS = 38%, 5-year-CSS = 33%). In univariable Cox regressions, TTS was not associated with CSS (p = 0.971) or RFS (p = 0.855), respectively. A grouped analysis with respect to TTS (≤ 30 days, n = 106; 31-60 days, n = 134; 61-90 days, n = 44; > 90 days, n = 29) displayed a median CSS of 38, 33, 51 and 41 months and median RFS of 17, 22, 28 and 20 months (p = 0.971 log rank; p = 0.520 log rank). No statistical difference regarding oncological risk factors were observed between the groups. This study is the first comprehensive analysis of TTS in CCA patients. Within a representative European cohort, TTS was not associated with earlier tumor recurrence or reduced CCS.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma

These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma—A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

Background

Radical resection remains the most effective treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, due to the complex anatomy of the hilar region, the tumor is prone to invade portal vein and hepatic arteries, making the surgical treatment of HCCA particularly difficult. Successful laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA(IIIA, IIIB) requires excellent surgical skills and rich experience. Furthermore, the safety and effectiveness of this operation are still controversial.

Aim

To retrospectively analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open surgery for patients with HCCA.

Methods

Clinical imaging and postoperative pathological data of 89 patients diagnosed with HCCA (IIIA, IIIB) and undergoing radical resection in our center from January 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 6 patients (4 were lost to follow-up and 2 were pathologically confirmed to have other diseases after surgery) were ruled out, and clinical data was collected from the remaining 83 patients for statistical analysis. These patients were divided into an open surgery group (n=62) and a laparoscopic surgery group (n=21) according to the surgical methods used, and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), 32 and 16 patients respectively in the open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group were remained. The demographic data, Bismuth type, perioperative data, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, pathological findings, and long-term survivals were compared between these two groups.

Results

After 1:2 PSM, 32 patients in the open surgery group and 16 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group were included for further analysis. Baseline characteristics and pathological outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in intraoperative blood loss and operative time, as it were 400-800 mL vs 200-400 mL (P=0.012) and (407.97 ± 76.06) min vs (489.69 ± 79.17) min (P=0.001) in the open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group, respectively. The R0 resection rate of the open group was 28 cases (87.5%), and the R0 resection rate of the laparoscopic group was 15 cases (93.75%). The two groups showed no significant difference in terms of surgical approach, intraoperative blood transfusion, incidence of postoperative complications, and short- and long-term efficacy (P&gt;0.05).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA has comparable perioperative safety compared to open surgery group, as it has less bleeding and shorter operation time. Although it is a promising procedure with the improvement of surgical skills and further accumulation of experience, further investigations are warranted before its wider application.

Establishment of rat allogenic vein replacement model and pathological characteristics of the replaced vessels

Background

With the advancement of vascular anastomosis techniques in recent years, radical surgery for tumors combined with venous vascular resection and reconstruction has been widely used. This study intends to establish two different rat vein replacement models, and further analyze the pathological changes of blood vessels after replacement.

Methods

Brown-Norway (BN) rats were selected as donors and recipients, randomly divided into control group, cuff group (1-week group, 2-week group, and 4-week group), and suture group (1-week group, 2-week group, and 4-week group), with 6 rats in each group. The perioperative conditions, inner diameter, flow velocity and histopathological changes of the replaced vessels at different time points were analyzed.

Results

Both cuff group and suture group can safely establish the rat vein replacement model. From the surgical operation, the operation time and venous cross-clamp time in the cuff group were shorter than those in the suture group (P &lt; 0.05). At 2 and 4 weeks after operation, the diameter of suture group was wider than that of cuff group, and the flow rate was faster (P &lt; 0.05). With prolonged postoperative survival, the wall of the replaced vessels underwent infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes and high TGF-β1 gene expression. This leads to the proliferation of blood vessels and intimal layer. The results of vascular pathological staining showed that the infiltration degree of CD4+ lymphocytes at 2 weeks after operation and CD8+ lymphocytes at 4 weeks after operation in the suture group was lighter than that in the cuff group (P &lt; 0.05). Meanwhile, TGF-β1 gene content at 4 weeks after operation in suture group was significantly lower than that in cuff group (P &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with cuff method, suture method is more suitable for the study of long-term pathological changes after vein replacement in rats. The main pathological changes in the long term after venous replacement in syngeneic background may be vascular fibrosis caused by inflammatory cell infiltration.

Effects of portal vein resection and hepatic artery resection on long-term survival in Klatskin tumor: a meta-analysis

Background

Surgical treatment is currently the only way to achieve the clinical cure for Klatskin tumor. However, whether combined vascular resection should be combined during surgeries is still controversial. The aim of this article was to analyze the effect of portal vein resection (PVR) and hepatic artery resection (HAR) on the long-term survival after surgery for Klatskin tumor.

Methods

Articles about Klatskin tumor with PVR and HAR, which were published from 2000 to 2020, were searched using PubMed, Embase, and EBSCO. HR with a 95% CI of overall survival, recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, 3- and 5-year survival rate, and median survival time were reported to evaluate prognosis.

Results

A total of 17 articles were included. The total case number of these studies was 3150 (685 in the PVR group, 345 in the HAR group, and 2120 in the control group). Survival analyses showed that both vascular resection types were poor prognostic factors (PVR: HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.24–1.81, P < 0.001; HAR: HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.26–2.24, P < 0.001; the pooled effect size of the two groups: HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.32–1.82, P < 0.001). In general, the analyses of 3- and 5-year survival and median survival time showed that both vascular resection types tended to be poor prognostic factors, but most of recent researches showed that the PVR did not lead to a poor prognosis.

Conclusion

PVR should be used when necessary to achieve R0 resection of Klatskin tumor and improve the long-term survival of patients. Whether HAR should be performed or not is still need to be evaluated.

Bacteremia after hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction for biliary cancer: the characteristics of bacteremia according to occurrence time and associated complications

PURPOSE

Bacteremia occurring after extensive hepatic resection and biliary reconstruction (Hx + Bx) for biliary cancer is a critical infectious complication. This study evaluated postoperative bacteremia and examined the potential usefulness of surveillance cultures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 179 patients who underwent Hx + Bx for biliary cancer from January 2008 to December 2018 in our department.

RESULTS

Bacteremia occurred in 41 (23.0%) patients. Patients with bacteremia had a longer operation time and more frequent intraoperative transfusion and more frequently developed organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) than those without bacteremia. The most frequently isolated bacterial species from blood cultures were Enterococcus faecium (29.3%), Enterobacter cloacae (24.4%), and Enterococcus faecalis (22.0%). The SIRS duration of bacteremia associated with organ/space SSI was significantly longer than that of other infectious complications (median 96 h vs. 48 h; p = 0.043). Bacteremia associated with organ/space SSI occurred most often by postoperative day (POD) 30. The concordance rate of bacterial species between blood and surveillance cultures within POD 30 was 67-82%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacteremia associated with organ/space SSI required treatment for a long time and typically occurred by POD 30. Postoperative surveillance cultures obtained during this period may be useful for selecting initial antibiotic therapy because of their high concordance rate with blood cultures.

Clinical and oncological benefits of left hepatectomy for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to clarify whether the postoperative prognosis differs between right and left hepatectomy for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Preoperative images of 195 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were reexamined. Patients with Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma without a difference in extraductal tumor invasion between the right and left sides of the hepatic portal region were classified into those undergoing left (L group) or right (R group) hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (11.8%) were classified into the L group and 33 (16.9%) into the R group. All eight patients with pTis/1 belonged to the L group. The L group had significantly less liver failure than the R group (p = 0.001). One patient (4.3%) in the L group and four patients (12.1%) in the R group died from postoperative complications. Among 48 patients with pT2, the L group tended to have better overall survival (median, 12.2 vs. 5.6 years; p = 0.072), but not recurrence-free survival (median, 9.1 vs. 3.6 years; p = 0.477), in comparison to the R group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative survival after left hepatectomy for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is expected to be as long as that after right hepatectomy.

The prognostic role of tumor-associated unilateral portal vein occlusion in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

While a certain degree of tumor infiltration of the portal vein is common in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) scheduled for surgery, complete tumor-associated portal vein occlusion (PVO) is less frequently observed. Here, we analyzed the impact of PVO on perioperative and oncological outcomes in pCCA patients.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2019, 127 patients with pCCA underwent surgery in curative intent at our department of which 17.3% (22/127) presented with PVO. Extensive group comparisons were conducted and the association of cancer-specific (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with PVO and other clinico-pathological characteristics were assessed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Patients without PVO showed a median CSS of 65 months (3-year-CSS = 64%, 5-year-CSS = 53%) compared to 31 months (3-year-CSS = 43%, 5-year-CSS = 17%) in patients with PVO (p = 0.025 log rank). Patients with PVO did also display significant perioperative mortality (22.7%, 5/22) compared to patients without PVO (14.3%, 15/105, p = 0.323). Further, PVO (CSS: HR = 5.25, p = 0.001; DFS: HR = 5.53, p = 0.001) was identified as independent predictors of oncological outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

PVO has been identified as an important prognostic marker playing a role in inferior oncological outcome in patients with pCCA. As PVO is also associated with notable perioperative mortality, surgical therapy should be considered carefully in pCCA patients.

Effect of vascular resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of vascular resection (VR), including portal vein resection (PVR) and hepatic artery resection (HAR), on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC).

BACKGROUND

Resection surgery and transplantation are the main treatment methods for PHC that provide a chance of long-term survival. However, the efficacy and safety of VR, including PVR and HAR, for treating PHC remain controversial.

METHODS

This study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020223330). The EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were used to search for eligible studies published through November 28, 2020. Studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes between patients who underwent hepatectomy with or without PVR and/or HAR were included. Random- and fixed-effects models were applied to assess the outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and R0 resection rate, as well as the impact of PVR and HAR on long-term survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies including 4,091 patients were deemed eligible and included in this study. The meta-analysis showed that PVR did not increase the postoperative morbidity rate (odds ratio (OR): 1.03, 95% confidenceinterval (CI): [0.74-1.42], P = 0.88) and slightly increased the postoperative mortality rate (OR: 1.61, 95% CI [1.02-2.54], P = 0.04). HAR did not increase the postoperative morbidity rate (OR: 1.32, 95% CI [0.83-2.11], P = 0.24) and significantly increased the postoperative mortality rate (OR: 4.20, 95% CI [1.88-9.39], P = 0.0005). Neither PVR nor HAR improved the R0 resection rate (OR: 0.70, 95% CI [0.47-1.03], P = 0.07; OR: 0.77, 95% CI [0.37-1.61], P = 0.49, respectively) or long-term survival (OR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.35-0.76], P = 0.0008; OR: 0.43, 95% CI [0.32-0.57], P < 0.00001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PVR is relatively safe and might benefit certain patients with advanced PHC in terms of long-term survival, but it is not routinely recommended. HAR results in a higher mortality rate and lower overall survival rate, with no proven benefit.

Vascular Involvements in Cholangiocarcinoma: Tips and Tricks

Simple Summary

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common liver primary malignancy and its gold-standard treatment is surgery. Unfortunately, CCA is seldom amenable to curative resection due to late-stage diagnosis and frequent major vascular invasion. Major vascular invasion has historically been considered a contraindication to resection, but lately aggressive surgeries for CCA with vascular involvement have been shown to improve outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and up to date summary of the strategies for CCA resection, focusing on the surgical techniques and results of complex procedures with tumour vascular involvements. The current review shows that satisfactory results can be achieved in patients with CCA and tumoral vascular invasion by aggressive surgical resection and challenging vascular reconstruction, ensuring a meticulous evaluation of patients in a multidisciplinary setting by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy of the biliary tract. To date, surgical treatment remains the only hope for definitive cure of CCA patients. Involvement of major vascular structures was traditionally considered a contraindication for resection. Nowadays, selected cases of CCA with vascular involvement can be successfully approached. Intrahepatic CCA often involves the major hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava and might necessitate complete vascular exclusion, in situ hypothermic perfusion, ex situ surgery and reconstruction with autologous, heterologous or synthetic grafts. Hilar CCA more frequently involves the portal vein and hepatic artery. Resection and reconstruction of the portal vein is now considered a relatively safe and beneficial technique, and it is accepted as a standard option either with direct anastomosis or jump grafts. However, hepatic artery resection remains controversial; despite accumulating positive reports, the procedure remains technically challenging with increased rates of morbidity. When arterial reconstruction is not possible, arterio-portal shunting may offer salvage, while sometimes an efficient collateral system could bypass the need for arterial reconstructions. Keys to achieve success are represented by accurate selection of patients in high-volume referral centres, adequate technical skills and eclectic knowledge of the various possibilities for vascular reconstruction.

Nerve Fibers in the Tumor Microenvironment as a Novel Biomarker for Oncological Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a biliary tract cancer with a dismal prognosis, with surgery being the only chance of cure. A characteristic aggressive biological feature of pCCA is perineural growth which is defined by the invasion of cancer cells to nerves and nerve fibers. Recently, nerve fiber density (NFD) was linked to oncological outcomes in various malignancies; however, its prognostic role in pCCA remains to be elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 101 pCCA patients who underwent curative-intent surgery between 2010 and 2019 were included in this study. Extensive group comparisons between patients with high and low NFD were carried out, and the association of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival with NFD and other clinicopathological characteristics was assessed using univariate and multivariable cox regression models.

RESULTS

Patients with high NFD showed a median CSS of 90 months (95% CI: 48-132, 3-year CSS = 77%, 5-year CSS = 72%) compared to 33 months (95% CI: 19-47, 3-year CSS = 46%, 5-year CSS = 32%) in patients with low NFD (p = 0.006 log rank). Further, N1 category (HR = 2.84, p = 0.001) and high NFD (HR = 0.41, p = 0.024) were identified as independent predictors of CSS in multivariable analysis. Patients with high NFD and negative lymph nodes showed a median CSS of 90 months (3-year CSS = 88%, 5-year CSS = 80%), while patients with either positive lymph nodes or low NFD displayed a median CSS of 51 months (3-year CSS = 59%, 5-year CSS = 45%) and patients with both positive lymph nodes and low NFD a median CSS of 24 months (3-year CSS = 26%, 5-year CSS = 16%, p = 0.001 log rank).

CONCLUSION

NFD has been identified as an important novel prognostic biomarker in pCCA patients. NFD alone and in combination with nodal status in particular allows to stratify pCCA patients based on their risk for inferior oncological outcomes after curative-intent surgery.

Bacterial bile duct colonization in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and its clinical significance

Abdominal infections including cholangitis represent a major problem in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Thus, we investigated bacterial colonization of the bile ducts and determined its impact on postoperative outcome focusing on abdominal infections. A cohort of 95 pCCA patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2019 with available intraoperative microbial bile cultures were analyzed regarding bile duct colonization and postoperative abdominal infection by group comparisons and logistic regressions. 84.2% (80/95) showed bacterial colonization of the bile ducts and 54.7% (52/95) developed postoperative abdominal infections. Enterococcus faecalis (38.8%, 31/80), Enterococcus faecium (32.5%, 26/80), Enterobacter cloacae (16.3%, 13/80) and Escherichia coli (11.3%, 9/80) were the most common bacteria colonizing the bile ducts and Enterococcus faecium (71.2%, 37/52), Enterococcus faecalis (30.8%, 16/52), Enterobacter cloacae (25.0%, 13/52) and Escherichia coli (19.2%, 10/52) the most common causes of postoperative abdominal infection. Further, reduced susceptibility to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (OR = 10.10, p = .007) was identified as independent predictor of postoperative abdominal infection. Bacterial colonization is common in pCCA patients and reduced susceptibility of the bacteria to the intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is an independent predictor of postoperative abdominal infections. Adapting antibiotic prophylaxis might therefore have the potential to improve surgical outcome pCCA patients.

Insufficient future liver remnant and preoperative cholangitis predict perioperative outcome in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Major liver resection has evolved as the mainstay of treatment for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Here we assessed the suitability of preoperative future liver remnant (FLR) measurement to predict perioperative complications, since surgical morbidity and mortality are high compared to other malignancies.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 91 patients with pCCA underwent surgery in curative intent at our institution. The associations of surgical complications with FLR and clinico-pathological characteristics were assessed using logistic regression analyses. Different methods of FLR assessment, the calculated-FLR (cFLR; ratio of FLR to total liver volume), standardized FLR (sFLR; ratio of FLR to liver volume estimated by body surface area) and FLR to bodyweight ratio (FLR/BW) were tested for validity.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis identified preoperative cholangitis (Exp(B) = 0.236; p = 0.030) as the single significant predictor of postoperative mortality and cFLR (Exp(B) = 0.009, p = 0.004) as the single significant predictor of major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b). Based on these findings we designed a futility criterion (cFLR<40% OR preoperative cholangitis) predicting in-house mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pCCA, the preoperative FLR<40% as well as preoperative cholangitis are two risk factors to independently predict perioperative morbidity and mortality. The cFLR should be the preferred method of liver volumetry.

Minimally invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 158 patients

BACKGROUND

Curative resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is typically carried out using open surgery. In the present study, we examined the safety (postoperative complication) and effectiveness (resection margin status and patient survival) of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for HC.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 158 patients receiving MIS for HC at 10 participating centers between December 2013 and November 2019. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Clinical information obtained from 10 different clinical centers did not show any evident cohort-bias clustering. One hundred and twenty-six (79.7%) patients underwent LRHC, 12 (7.6%) patients underwent RARHC, conversion to an open procedure occurred in 20 (12.7%) patients. The operation time and estimated blood loss were 410.8 ± 128.9 min and 477.8 ± 706.3 mL, respectively. The surgical radicality of the 158 patients was R0, 129 (81.6%); R1, 20 (18.4%) and R2, 9 (5.7%). Grades I-II complications was occurred in 68 (43.0%) patients. Severe morbidity (grade III-V) occurred in 14 (8.7%) patients. The median overall survival in whole cohort was 25.4 months. The overall survival rate was 67.6% at year 1, 28.8% at year 3, and 19.2% at year 5. Comparing the first half of MISHC performed by each center with the following cases, the operation time and postoperative hospital stay does not decrease with the increasing cases. On literature review, MISHC is non-inferior to open surgery at least in perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Chinese MIS for HC multicenter study, the largest to date, long-term overall survival rates after MIS appear comparable to those reported in current open series. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to assess the global impact of MISHC.

Vascular resection and reconstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aggressive approach of vascular resection plus reconstruction in curative resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) remains controversial. This retrospective study investigated its short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Data of HC patients from 1989 to 2016 were reviewed. Operated patients were divided into two groups (with and without vascular resection) and compared in terms of perioperative results. Patients who had unresectable HC were also compared with patients who had been operated.

RESULTS

Ninety patients underwent curative HC resection. They were divided into group A (without aggressive approach, n = 68) and group B (with aggressive approach, n = 22). The groups were comparable in all parameters including rates of overall and major complication and in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality except that group B had more patients with more advanced disease (P = 0.008), more patients with tumour invasion of the vasculature (40.9% versus 7.4%, P = 0.001), and fewer patients with blood transfusion (27.3% versus 52.9%, P = 0.036). The groups had similar disease-free survival (group A: median, 17.9 months, 5 years, 27.4%; group B: median, 11.7 months, 5 years, 14.3%; P = 0.427) and overall survival (group A: median, 22.0 months, 5 years, 26.5%; group B: median, 26.5 months, 5 years, 14.7%; P = 0.90). Two hundred patients with unresectable HC were compared with patients who had received operation and found to have worse survival outcomes (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular resection plus reconstruction in HC resection was feasible and safe and might improve the long-term survival of patients with advanced HC. This aggressive approach should be adopted if the expertise is available and the patient's condition allows.

Leakage and Stenosis of the Hepaticojejunostomy Following Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

This study aims to provide a deep insight into the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) and anastomotic stenosis (AS) of the hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) after curative-intent liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Between 2011 and mid-2019, 114 patients with pCCA underwent surgery in curative intent at our institution and were analyzed regarding the postoperative incidence of AL and AS. Further, associations between AL and AS and clinical characteristics were assessed using multiple univariate logistic regression analyses. AL was diagnosed in 11.4% (13/114) of the patients resulting in postoperative mortality in the minority of patients (23.0%, 3/13). AS occurred in 11.0% (11/100) of the individuals eligible for follow-up with local tumor recurrence being the underlying pathology in 72.7% (8/11) of the cases. None of the investigated clinical factors including surgical difficulty of the HJ showed a meaningful association with AL or AS. AL and AS are frequent complications and can be treated by conservative, interventional or surgical therapy with a high success rate. Also, technical difficulty of the HJ appears not to be not associated with the occurrence of AL or AS. Moreover, AS is associated with tumor recurrence in the majority of cases.

Left- versus right-sided hepatectomy with hilar en-bloc resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Major liver resections with portal vein resection (PVR) have emerged as the preferred treatment for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Whether the resection of the liver should be preferably performed as left- (LH) or right-sided hepatectomy (RH) with or without hilar en-bloc technique is still subject of ongoing debate.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 91 patients with pCCA underwent surgery in curative intent at our institution. Perioperative, pathological and survival data from all consecutive patients undergoing hilar en-bloc resection for pCCA were analyzed retrospectively. Patients undergoing hepatoduodenectomy (n = 8) or ALPPS (Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) (n = 2) were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

Tumor grading, microvascular invasion, lymphovascular invasion, N-category, T-category, R-status and UICC-tumor staging were similar in the RH (n = 45) and LH (n = 36) groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were higher after RH compared to LH (mortality: 15.6% (7/45) vs. 8.3% (3/36) p = 0.003). Three-year (62% vs. 51%) and the 5-year OS (30% vs. 46%) were comparable between LH and RH groups respectively (p = 0.519, log rank).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the concept of surgically aggressive therapy in pCCA. LH and RH hilar en-bloc resection demonstrate a comparable long-term survival, suggesting that LH hilar en-bloc resections are feasible and safe in high-volume centers.

Surgical Outcomes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Vascular Invasion

PURPOSE

To investigate short- and long-term surgical outcomes for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and vascular invasion.

METHODS

Data from 249 patients who underwent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient evaluations included short-term surgical outcomes following vascular resection and long-term outcomes in cases with histopathological vascular invasion.

RESULTS

Mortality was 3.6% overall; 16% for hepatic artery resections, 5.4% for portal vein resections, and 1.7% in the absence of vascular resection (p = 0.029). No between-group differences were observed in the incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications. The factors related to perioperative mortality were hepatic artery resection (odds ratio [OR] = 25.5), right trisectionectomy (OR = 13.0), and central bisectionectomy (OR = 13.8). Multivariate analysis for overall survival identified several prognostic factors: carcinoembryonic antigen level ≥ 5 ng/mL (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68), poor differentiation (HR = 2.39), distant metastasis (HR = 1.97), and R1 invasive resection (HR = 2.13). Five-year overall survival for patients with portal vein invasion and M0R0/1cis was 35.6%, significantly worse than the 53.4% for patients with no portal vein invasion and M0R/1cis but better than the 0% for patients with portal vein invasion and M1 or R1. Those with hepatic arterial invasion and M0R0/1cis were 24.7%, significantly worse than the 53.4% for patients with no hepatic arterial invasion and M0R0/1cis but significantly better than the 0% for patients with hepatic arterial invasion and M1 or R1.

CONCLUSION

Short-term outcomes for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and undergoing vascular resection were poor compared to those without vascular resection. Long-term survival in R0M0 disease was more favorable; aggressive surgery is recommended.

Our Rationale of Initiating Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Proposal of Criteria for "Borderline Resectable" in the Field of Surgery for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The concept of "borderline resectable" was recently introduced to the field of surgery for pancreatic cancer, and surgical outcomes for this disease with extremely dismal prognosis have improved since the introduction of this concept. However, no such concept has yet been introduced to the field of surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCca).

AIM

To determine a definition and criteria for "borderline resectable" in the field of surgery for HCca.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 88 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCca at our institution between May 1992 and December 2008 to clarify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Survival outcomes were obtained for these 88 patients, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 31.8%. Independent factors predictive of cancer death were determined by multivariate analysis to be the presence of regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) and pathological confirmed vascular invasion (VI). Cumulative survival rates of 23 patients with both LNM and VI who underwent surgery were significantly worse than those of the remaining 65 surgically treated patients and similar to those of 26 patients who were considered to have unresectable disease and treated with non-surgical multidisciplinary treatment during the same study period.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of surgery for cases of HCca showing regional LNM and VI were no better than those of non-surgical treatment for unresectable disease. Coexistence of these two factors indicates oncologically dismal condition and thus such cases should be considered "borderline resectable." Treatments additional to surgery are required for "borderline resectable" cases to obtain better outcomes.

Perilesional Resection of Glioblastoma Is Independently Associated With Improved Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Resection is a critical component in the initial treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Often GBMs are resected using an intralesional method. Circumferential perilesional resection of GBMs has been described, but with limited data.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an observational retrospective analysis to test whether perilesional resection produced a greater extent of resection.

METHODS

We identified all patients with newly diagnosed GBM who underwent resection at our institution from June 1, 1993 to December 31, 2015. Demographics, presenting symptoms, intraoperative data, method of resection (perilesional or intralesional), volumetric imaging data, and postoperative outcomes were obtained. Complete resection (CR) was defined as 100% resection of all contrast-enhancing disease. Univariate analyses employed analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analyses used propensity score-weighted multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Newly diagnosed GBMs were resected in 1204 patients, 436 tumors (36%) perilesionally and 766 (64%) intralesionally. Radiographic CR was achieved in 69% of cases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that perilesional tumor resection was associated with a significantly higher rate of CR than intralesional resection (81% vs 62%, multivariate odds ratio = 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-3.4, P < .001). Among tumors in eloquent cortex, multivariate analysis showed that patients who underwent perilesional resection had a higher rate of CR (79% vs 58%, respectively, P < .001) and a lower rate of neurological complications (11% vs 20%, respectively, P = .018) than those who underwent intralesional resection.

CONCLUSION

Circumferential perilesional resection of GBM is associated with significantly higher rates of CR and lower rates of neurological complications than intralesional resection, even for tumors arising in eloquent locations. Perilesional resection, when feasible, should be considered as a preferred option.

Outcomes after vascular resection during curative-intent resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative-intent therapy for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). The role of vascular resection (VR) in the treatment of HC in western centres is not well defined.

METHODS

Utilizing data from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium, patients were grouped into those who underwent resection for HC based on VR status: no VR, portal vein resection (PVR), or hepatic artery resection (HAR). Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2015, 201 patients underwent resection for HC, of which 31 (15%) underwent VR: 19 patients (9%) underwent PVR alone and 12 patients (6%) underwent HAR either with (n = 2) or without PVR (n = 10). Patients selected for VR tended to be younger with higher stage disease. Rates of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were similar when stratified by vascular resection status. On multivariate analysis, receipt of PVR or HAR did not significantly affect OS or RFS.

CONCLUSION

In a modern, multi-institutional cohort of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for HC, VR appears to be a safe procedure in a highly selected subset, although long-term survival outcomes appear equivalent. VR should be considered only in select patients based on tumor and patient characteristics.

Resection for Klatskin tumors: technical complexities and results

Klatskin's tumors, actually-redefined as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA) do represent 50-70% of all CCAs and develop in a context of chronic inflammation and cholestasis of bile ducts. Surgical resection provides the only chance of cure for this disease but is technically challenging because of the complex, intimate and variable relationship between biliary and vascular structures at this location. Five years survival rates range between 25-45% (median 27-58 months) in case of R0 resection and 0-23% (median 12-21 months) in case of R1 resection respectively. It should be noted that the major costs of high radicality are represented by relative high morbidity and mortality rates (i.e., 20-66% and 0-9% respectively). Considering the fact that radical resection may represent the only curative treatment of phCCA, we focused our review on surgical planning and techniques that may improve resectability rates and outcomes for locally advanced phCCA. The surgical treatment of phCCA can be successful when following aspects have been fulfilled: (I) accurate preoperative diagnostic aimed to identify the tumor in all its details (localization and extension) and to study all the risk factors influencing a posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF): i.e., liver volume, liver function, liver quality, haemodynamics and patient characteristics; (II) High end surgical skills taking in consideration the local extension of the tumor and the vascular invasion which usually require an extended hepatic resection and often a vascular resection; (III) adequate postoperative management aimed to avoid major complications (i.e., PHLF and biliary complications). These are technically challenging operations and must be performed in a high volume centres by hepato-biliary-pancreas (HBP)-surgeons with experience in microsurgical vascular techniques.

Total Hilar En Bloc Resection with Left Hemihepatectomy and Caudate Lobectomy: a Novel Approach for Treatment of Left-Sided Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (with Video)

BACKGROUND

"Hilar en bloc resection" using a no-touch technique has been advocated as a standard procedure in right-sided hepatectomies for treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). In principle, it has never been reported for left-sided tumors. The aim is to describe the procedures of total hilar en bloc resection with left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy (THER-LH) for advanced PHC and discuss feasibility and clinical significance of this novel technique.

METHODS

A retrospective study using a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify eight patients who had received THER-LH for advanced PHC from January 2013 to December 2015. The clinicopathological features, surgical procedures, and outcomes of these patients form the basis this study.

RESULTS

The operative time was 546 ± 158 (380-870) min, and estimated blood loss was 875 ± 690 (400-2500) ml. Time of vessel resection and reconstruction was 25.6 ± 12.3 min for the portal vein and 19.1 ± 4.9 min for the hepatic artery. Time of hilum clamping was 27.3 ± 11.9 (15-41) min. Two patients had Clavien-Dindo grade II and IVa complications of bile leakage with one developing intraabdominal abscess and bleeding. There was no perioperative mortality. Histopathologic examination revealed that all of eight patients had tubular adenocarcinoma with microscopic invasion to the resected hepatic arteries and portal veins in seven patients. Negative bile duct margins were achieved in all of them. Three patients developed recurrence and died at 11, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. The remaining patients were alive at the time of last follow-up. The median survival was 24 months with one patient achieving a disease-free survival of 50 months.

CONCLUSION

THER-LH is a technically demanding procedure that is safe and feasible that may have some beneficial effects on the prognosis of these patients with advanced PHC. Further studies are required to confirm the oncological superiority and survival benefits of this novel technique.

Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: early results of en bloc portal vein resection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyse the safety, feasibility and survival outcomes of our treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) since the introduction of more aggressive approaches (en bloc, vascular and extended liver resections) in 2007.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From July 2007 to December 2014, 32 consecutive patients with PHC underwent surgery with curative intent. Surgery with resection and reconstruction of the portal vein bifurcation and right hepatic artery was performed if necessary for a complete removal of the tumour. Perioperative data and postoperative histological findings, tumour recurrence rates and survival rates were recorded. Seventeen (53%) of the patients presented with stage IIIb or IV according to the UICC classification system.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate in our series was 45%, and this percentage increased to 65% when patients with advanced stage cancer (stage IIIb or higher) were excluded. We performed 3 arterials and 23 portal vein reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent extended hemihepatectomy. We achieved cancer-free margins in 19 patients (60%). Tumour stage and nodal involvement were the most important prognostic factors. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates of this cohort were 72% (23) and 15.6% (5), respectively; these results were similar to data published by other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive approach involving en bloc or extended liver resection combined with vascular reconstruction provides acceptable morbidity and mortality and increases the 5-year survival rate of PHC.

The Surgical Management of Klatskin Tumours: Has Anything Changed in the Last Decade?

Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinomas requires complex pre-, intra- and post-operative decision-making. Despite the significant progress in liver surgery over the years, several issues such as the role of pre-operative biliary drainage, portal vein embolisation, staging laparoscopy and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remain unresolved. Operative strategies such as vascular resection, caudate lobe resection and liver transplant have also been practiced in order to improve R0 resectability and improved survival. The review aims to consolidate evidence from major studies in the last 11 years. Survival data were only included from studies that reported the results in at least 30 patients with 1-year follow-up. A significant number of patients may be prevented an unnecessary laparotomy if they underwent a staging laparoscopy. There remain no guidelines as to when portal vein embolisation or pre-operative biliary drainage should be employed but most studies agree with pre-operative biliary drainage being an absolute indication if portal vein embolisation is performed. Concomitant hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy increases R0 resection but vascular resection cannot be routinely recommended. Liver transplant at specialised centres in selective patients has had impressive results. Guidelines are required for pre-operative biliary drainage and portal vein embolisation and randomised trials are required in order to define the role of vascular resection in achieving a R0 resection and increasing survival.

Prognostic impact of the site of portal vein invasion in patients with surgically resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the site of portal vein invasion on survival after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

This study classified 168 patients undergoing resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma histologically as without portal vein resection or tumor invasion to the portal vein (PV0), with tumor invasion to unilateral branches of the portal vein (PVt3), or with tumor invasion to the main portal vein or its bilateral branches, or to unilateral second-order biliary radicals with contralateral portal vein involvement (PVt4). Patients in PVt4 were subclassified into the A-M group (cancer invasion limited to the tunica adventitia or media) or the I group (cancer invasion reaching the tunica intima).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 121 were in PV0, 21 were in PVt3, and 26 were in PVt4. There was no difference in survival between the PV0 and PVt3 groups (P = .267). The PVt4 group had a worse prognosis than the PVt3 group (P = .046). In addition, the A-M (n = 19) and I subgroups (n = 7) of PVt4 had worse prognoses than the PV0 or PVt3 groups (P = .005 and < .001, respectively). All patients in the I subgroup of PVt4 died within 9 months after resection. On multivariate analysis, PVt4 (P = .029) was identified as an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

In perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, postoperative survival was no different between patients with and without ipsilateral portal vein invasion, although patients with tumor invasion to the main or contralateral branches of the portal vein, especially with tunica intima invasion, had extremely poor prognoses.

Combined vascular resection and analysis of prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is a devastating malignancy arising from the bifurcation of the hepatic duct, whether combined vascular resection benefits HCCA patients is controversial. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of combined vascular resection in HCCA patients and to analyze the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Clinical data of 154 HCCA patients who had been treated from January 2005 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups based on vascular resection: those without vascular resection; those with portal vein resection alone and those with hepatic artery resection. The survival and complication rates were compared among the three groups. Multivariate analysis was made to determine prognostic factors.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in survival and complication rates among the three groups (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that 3 factors were related to survival: lymph node metastasis, tumor size (>2.5 cm), and positive resection margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular resection improved the survival rate of patients with HCCA involving the hepatic artery or portal vein. Lymph node metastasis, tumor size (>2.5 cm) and positive resection margin were poor prognostic factors in patients with HCCA.

Bile duct surgery in the treatment of hepatobiliary and gallbladder malignancies: effects of hepatic and vascular resection on outcomes

BACKGROUND

Resection of the bile duct is required for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma and is sometimes indicated in resections of liver and gallbladder malignancies. The goal of this retrospective review was to characterize surgical outcomes in patients submitted to bile duct resection for malignancy when additional procedures, specifically hepatic or vascular resections, were performed.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was searched to identify a total of 747 patients who underwent: (i) biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA) only (Group 1, n = 266); (ii) BEA with hepatic resection (Group 2, n = 439), or (iii) BEA with hepatic and vascular resection (Group 3, n = 42). Postoperative outcomes were compared and regression-adjusted risk factors were analysed to produce observed and expected (O/E) morbidity and mortality ratios.

RESULTS

The performance of hepatic and vascular resections significantly increased rates of overall morbidity (P < 0.001) and mortality (P = 0.021). Risk-adjusted O/E mortality ratios in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-2.30], 2.16 (95% CI 1.51-2.98) and 5.92 (95% CI 2.54-11.66), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Group 2 (P < 0.001) and Group 3 (P = 0.001) status as independent predictors of morbidity, and Group 3 status (P = 0.008) as independently associated with mortality. More than 30% of deaths were associated with pulmonary complications and septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of hepatic and vascular resections to bile duct resection significantly increased morbidity and mortality. The high O/E mortality ratios for patients in Groups 2 and 3 suggest these outcomes can be improved.

Combined portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the only curative therapy for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). Combined portal vein resection (PVR) could achieve negative resection margins in HCCA patients with portal vein invasion. This systematic review aimed to analysis the efficiency of combined PVR for HCCA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and clinical trial registries were searched through April 2015. Risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The analysis included 21 retrospective studies, altogether involving 2403 patients (patients with PVR, n=637; patients without PVR, n=1766). Patients with PVR were likely to have more advanced HCCA (lymphatic invasion: RR=1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.28; perineural invasion: RR=1.31, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.63) and suffered less curative resections (RR=0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). Postoperative morbidity was similar between patients with or without PVR (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.02). Patients with PVR suffered higher mortality rate (RR=1.52, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.18), and worse 5-year survival rate (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.91).

CONCLUSION

Combined PVR for HCCA patients would not increase postoperative morbidity rate. However, ascribed to PVR group concluded more advanced HCCA patients; patients with PVR had increased postoperative mortality rate and worse survival rate. The results still need further high quality trails for validation.

Curative effect of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Analysis of 41 cases

AIM: To explore the curative effect of surgery in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the clinical data for 41 HC patients treated from October 2007 to March 2010 in Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College.

RESULTS: In the 41 patients, the incidence of postoperative complications was 36.59%, including incision infection in 2 cases, pulmonary infection in 3 cases, bile leakage in 3 cases, and pleural effusion in 7 cases. After radical resection, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 78.6%, 42.9% and 21.4%, respectively. After palliative resection, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 41.7%, 16.7% and 0.0%, respectively. In the conservative treatment (jaundice control) group, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 25.0%, 8.3% and 0.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Radical resection can obviously improve the survival of HC patients.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor affecting the extrahepatic bile duct. Surgical treatment offers the only possibility of cure, and it requires removal of all tumoral tissues with adequate resection margins. The aims of this review are to summarize the findings and to discuss the controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The English medical literatures on hilar cholangiocarcinoma were studied to review on the relevance of adequate resection margins, routine caudate lobe resection, extent of liver resection, and combined vascular resection on perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Complete resection of tumor represents the most important prognostic factor of long-term survival for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The primary aim of surgery is to achieve R0 resection. When R1 resection is shown intraoperatively, further resection is recommended. Combined hepatic resection is now generally accepted as a standard procedure even for Bismuth type I/II tumors. Routine caudate lobe resection is also advocated for cure. The extent of hepatic resection remains controversial. Most surgeons recommend major hepatic resection. However, minor hepatic resection has also been advocated in most patients. The decision to carry out right- or left-sided hepatectomy is made according to the predominant site of the lesion. Portal vein resection should be considered when its involvement by tumor is suspected.

CONCLUSION

The curative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains challenging. Advances in hepatobiliary techniques have improved the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of this tumor.

Surgical technique of hepatectomy combined with simultaneous resection of hepatic artery and portal vein for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (with video)

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas often involve the bifurcation of the portal vein and the hepatic artery at initial presentation. Previously, vascular invasion was a major obstacle for R0 resection; therefore, such tumors were regarded as locally advanced, unresectable disease. Recently, in leading centers, these tumors have been resected using a specific technique, vascular resection and reconstruction. Vascular resection is classified into three types: portal vein resection alone, hepatic artery resection alone, and simultaneous resection of both the portal vein and hepatic artery. Of these, portal vein resection is widely performed, whereas hepatic artery resection remains controversial. Therefore, hepatectomy combined with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery represents one of the most complicated and challenging procedures in hepatobiliary surgery. The survival benefit of this extended procedure remains unproven, and there is only a single study reporting an unexpectedly favorable outcome in 50 patients. Considering the dismal survival in patients with unresectable disease, hepatic artery resection and/or portal vein resection may be a promising option of choice. However, the technique is highly demanding and has not been standardized. Therefore, this extended surgery may be allowed only in selected hepatobiliary centers.

Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has largely evolved, and increased resectability rates are reported. Large series of patients with resections for HC were published in the last years, and potential predictors for survival were explored. However, the usefulness of these predictors in clinical decision making is controversial.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present review is to explore the main prognostic factors after curative-intent surgery for HC, as emerged from the current literature. Furthermore, the impact of these predictors on clinical decision making is assessed.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach has improved the survival rates in patients with HC and implies bile duct resection associated with liver resection and loco-regional lymph node dissection. The AJCC staging system remains the main tool to assess the prognosis after resection of HC. Margin-negative resections and absence of lymph node metastases are the main prognostic factor after curative-intent surgery for HC. Response to chemotherapy is also a prognostic factor. Markers of systemic inflammatory response might predict prognosis of patients with HC, but their usefulness in clinical decision making remains unclear.

Novel en-bloc resection of locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Rex recess approach

Loco-regional recurrence after potentially curative resection remains a problem in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hilar dissection risks local spillage of tumor cells leading to suboptimal disease free survival. We have developed a new technique of radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma based on the distinctive anatomy of the Rex recess of the liver, which has been assessed in two patients with locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. This technique included a right hepatectomy with en-bloc resection of the hepatoduodenal ligament and portal venous reconstruction to the left portal vein at the Rex recess. Both patients had R0 resection and have been disease-free for 26 and 38 months, respectively.