African American race is a risk factor for severe hidradenitis suppurativa

High-throughput proteomics identifies inflammatory proteins associated with disease severity and genetic ancestry in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with a greater prevalence and disease burden in patients who identify as African American and those with a family history of HS, suggesting a strong genetic component to its pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between plasma inflammatory protein expression, HS disease severity and genetic ancestry in a diverse cohort of patients with HS.

METHODS

We performed a case-control, single-centre study of patients with HS and age-, sex- and ethnicity-matched healthy control participants. We profiled circulating inflammatory proteins using Olink® high-throughput proteomics and determined genetic ancestry from whole-genome sequencing data.

RESULTS

Using linear regression, we identified novel proteins associated with HS, after adjusting for age, sex and ethnicity. Our analysis also revealed differences in the inflammatory proteome linked to disease severity. Specifically, we found that plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6 can distinguish between different Hurley stages, indicating that IL-6 may serve as a marker of disease severity. Additionally, we found variations in inflammatory protein levels based on genetic ancestry: patients with predominantly African ancestry exhibited higher levels of inflammatory proteins associated with neutrophilic inflammation, while those with predominantly European ancestry showed increased levels of T helper 1-related inflammatory proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we were unable to account for treatment status or comorbidities that may influence the level of inflammatory cytokines, genetic ancestry and disease severity may influence the plasma inflammatory profile in patients with HS.

Racial Differences in Disease Characteristics of Pediatric Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Understanding the potential racial differences in presentation, severity, and outcomes of pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can help deliver equitable and individualized care, especially as this condition is increasingly being acknowledged in this population. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 70 pediatric patients diagnosed with HS who were seen at our institution. There was no statistically significant difference in biologic treatments between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients when compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, although NHW patients overall received biologic therapy more frequently (17.4%) than NHB patients (12.8%). The observed racial differences in pediatric HS highlight the need for further investigation of possible underlying factors contributing to disease heterogeneity and treatment response to optimize the care provided and patient outcomes.

Exploring racial and ethnic disparities in the hidradenitis suppurativa patient disease journey: Results from a real-world study in Europe and the USA

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease associated with high morbidity and disability that has limited treatment options. People from racial and ethnic minority groups may experience greater disease severity and delay to diagnosis. This study assessed the impact of race/ethnicity on HS diagnosis and management in real-world clinical settings. Data were derived from the Adelphi Real World Hidradenitis Suppurativa Disease Specific Programme, a survey of dermatologists and their consulting HS patients in five European countries and the USA in 2020/2021. Dermatologists returned demographic and clinical data, and treatment goals and satisfaction for their next five to seven consulting patients. Patients completed a questionnaire on disease history and diagnosis, disease burden, and treatment satisfaction. Groups were compared with bivariate tests. In total, 312 physicians returned data on 1787 patients; 57.6% were female and 77.7% White. People from racial and ethnic minority groups were younger than White patients (32.9 ± 11.6 vs. 34.9 ± 12.4, mean ± standard deviation) and reported symptoms at a younger age (23.3 ± 10.8 vs. 26.2 ± 11.1), but their time to first consultation was longer than for White patients (2.6 ± 5.7 vs. 1.2 ± 2.5 years). People from racial and ethnic minority groups took longer to receive a correct diagnosis following first consultation (2.7 ± 5.3 vs. 1.5 ± 4.1 years) and were more likely to be misdiagnosed with boils (73.5% vs. 40.4%). People from racial and ethnic minority groups had a greater disease awareness at diagnosis and reported wanting greater support. People from racial and ethnic minority groups reported a greater impact on life, more severe pain, and a greater level of activity impairment in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (27.0 ± 25.2 vs. 20.0 ± 20.6). All P values were ≤0.05. These data show evidence of delayed diagnosis and higher HS symptom burden amongst people from racial and ethnic minority groups, highlighting health disparities in HS.

Equity and Outcome Events in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Exploring Effect Modifiers Associated with Diagnostic Delay in the Real World

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) experience significantly delayed diagnoses of 7-10 years from symptom onset on average, but the reasons for this remain largely unknown. This study investigated drivers of diagnostic delay from the perspective of healthcare system equity.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify published factors associated with delayed HS diagnosis to inform data analysis. Clinical and demographic data from the Adelphi HS Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a real-world cross-sectional survey of dermatologists and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA in 2020/2021, were used to model factors influencing delay to diagnosis from onset of symptoms and first consultation.

RESULTS

Factors influencing delay to HS diagnosis in the literature with the most available evidence were misdiagnosis, delay in specialist referral and patient embarrassment. Data analysis revealed that increasing age was associated with reduced diagnostic delay after symptom onset. Patients with HS who were White or in Germany were also more likely to receive a faster diagnosis. Smokers, patients with concomitant conditions, or a family history of HS were slower to be diagnosed. When time to diagnosis following first consultation was assessed, increasing age was associated with quicker diagnosis. Moreover, patients with a family history of HS were diagnosed quicker, whereas those with high body mass index, more concomitant conditions, in employment, managed by multiple physicians or European were more delayed.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of a thorough analysis of real-world data, multiple factors that potentially influenced the timely diagnosis of HS have been identified. For the first time, this study quantifies the relative impact of these modifiers, providing valuable insights into areas that require attention for faster diagnoses and improved disease outcomes.

The Global Hidradenitis Suppurativa Atlas Methodology: Combining Global Proportions in a Pooled Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Data concerning the global burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are limited. Reported prevalence estimates vary between 0.0003% and 4.1%, and data from various geographical regions are still to be collected. Previously reported prevalences have been limited by the methodological approach and source of data. This has resulted in great heterogeneity as prevalence data from physician-diagnosed cases poorly match those of self-reported apparent HS disease.

METHODS

The Global Hidradenitis Suppurativa Atlas (GHiSA) introduces an innovative approach to determine the global prevalence of HS. This approach involves using a previously validated questionnaire to screen apparently healthy adults accompanying a patient to a non-dermatological outpatient clinic visit in a hospital or a private/family medicine clinic. The screening questionnaire (i.e., the index test) is combined with a subsequent physician-based in-person validation (i.e., the reference standard) of the participants who screen positive. Approximately ten percent of the screen-negative participants are also clinically assessed to verify the diagnostic precision of the test. The local prevalence (pi) will be estimated from each country that submits the number of patients who are HS positive according to the index test and clinical examination (n), and the corresponding total number of observations (N).

CONCLUSION

The GHiSA Global Prevalence studies are currently running simultaneously in 58 countries across six continents (Africa, Europe, Australia, North America, South America, and Asia). The goal of the combined global proportion is the generation of a single summary (i.e., proportional meta-analysis), which will be done after a logit transformation and synthesized using a random-effects model. The novel standardization of the Global Prevalence Studies conducted through GHiSA enables direct international comparisons, which were previously not possible due to substantial heterogeneity in past HS prevalence studies.

The Influence of Pain on Reduced Quality of Life in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pain and itch are impactful and burdensome symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Elucidating factors associated with pain and itch severity may identify groups disproportionally affected by HS-related pain and itch and further our understanding of how pain and itch impact quality of life (QoL) in patients with HS.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine factors associated with pain severity, itch severity, and reduced QoL in patients with HS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 257 adults with HS who received care in an HS Specialty Clinic from January 2019 to August 2021. Multivariable mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine the relationships between clinical and demographic patient factors and the outcomes of pain severity, itch severity, and skin-specific QoL.

RESULTS

Factors associated with reduced QoL were Hurley stage II (β = 19.66, 95% CI: 1.40-37.93) and III (β = 21.98, 95% CI: 1.57-42.39) disease as well as severity of pain (β = 13.74, 95% CI: 11.93-15.55), itch (β = 4.57, 95% CI: 2.59-6.55), anxiety (β = 2.55 95% CI: 1.29-3.81), and depression (β = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.30-2.56). Increasing HS pain severity was associated with Hurley stage III disease (β = 2.04, 95% Cl: 0.99-3.09), black race (β = 1.23, 95% Cl: 0.40, 2.06), depression severity (β = 0.08, 95% Cl: 0.02, 0.14), and anxiety severity (β = 0.10 95% Cl: 0.04, 0.17). Factors associated with HS itch severity were Hurley stage III disease (β = 2.23, 95% Cl: 1.19, 3.27), black race (β = 0.92, 95% Cl: 0.07, 1.78), depression severity (β = 0.09, 95% Cl: 0.04, 0.14), and anxiety severity (β = 0.07, 95% Cl: 0.01, 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Pain is one of the largest contributors to QoL in patients with HS; on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, a 2-point increase in HS pain had a similar independent effect on QoL as having Hurley stage III disease compared to Hurley stage I.

Patient perspectives of wound care management in hidradenitis suppurativa

Wound care management and costs in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are unmet needs. This study explored patient perspectives of at-home management of acute flares of HS and chronic daily wounds, their satisfaction with current wound care methods, and the financial burden of wound care supplies. An anonymous, multiple choice, cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed among online HS-related forums between August and October 2022. Participants 18 years or older with a diagnosis of HS who live in the United States were included. In total, 302 participants completed the questionnaire: 168 White (55.6%), 76 Black (25.2%), 33 Hispanic (10.9%), 7 Asian (2.3%), 12 multiracial (4.0%), and 6 other (2.0%). Dressings commonly reported included gauze, panty liners or menstrual pads, tissues or toilet paper, antiseptic dressing, abdominal pads, and adhesive bandages. Commonly reported topical remedies for acute flares of HS included warm compresses, Epsom salt baths, Vicks VapoRub, tea tree oil, witch hazel, and bleach baths. One-third of participants (n = 102) reported dissatisfaction with current wound care methods, and 48.8% (n = 103) believed that their dermatologist does not meet their wound care needs. Nearly half (n = 135) reported being unable to afford the type and quantity of dressings and wound care supplies they would ideally want. Black participants were more likely than White participants to report being unable to afford their dressings and find the cost as very burdensome. Overall, dermatologists must improve patient education of wound care methods in HS and address the financial burden of wound care supplies by exploring insurance-funded options.