Evaluation of a new thromboplastin reagent STA‐NeoPTimal on a STA R Max analyzer for the measurement of prothrombin time, international normalized ratio and extrinsic factor levels

M6229 Protects against Extracellular-Histone-Induced Liver Injury, Kidney Dysfunction, and Mortality in a Rat Model of Acute Hyperinflammation

Extracellular histones have been shown to act as DAMPs in a variety of inflammatory diseases. Moreover, they have the ability to induce cell death. In this study, we show that M6229, a low-anticoagulant fraction of unfractionated heparin (UFH), rescues rats that were challenged by continuous infusion of calf thymus histones at a rate of 25 mg histones/kg/h. Histone infusion by itself induced hepatic and homeostatic dysfunction characterized by elevated activity of hepatic enzymes (ASAT and ALAT) and serum lactate levels as well as by a renal dysfunction, which contributed to the significantly increased mortality rate. M6229 was able to restore normal levels of both hepatic and renal parameters at 3 and 9 mg M6229/kg/h and prevented mortality of the animals. We conclude that M6229 is a promising therapeutic agent to treat histone-mediated disease.

Effect of conventional hemodialysis on the apixaban plasma concentration

PURPOSE

Apixaban is a factor Xa inhibitor used in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of hemodialysis on apixaban plasma concentrations.

METHODS

This observational study is on patients treated with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily on conventional hemodialysis with standard low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) anticoagulation (nadroparin 3800-7600 IU). Plasma blood samples were collected before starting dialysis (t1), 2 h after starting dialysis (t2), and directly after dialysis (t3). Apixaban concentration was measured before and after dialysis. Anti-Xa activity was measured for all three samples.

RESULTS

A significant difference was observed between the apixaban concentration before and after dialysis (mean before dialysis 141.03 ng/mL; mean after dialysis 102.71 ng/mL; p = 0.003). Nonetheless, both apixaban plasma concentrations and anti-Xa levels remained within the reference range. Anti-Xa levels had a strong correlation with the apixaban concentrations (r = 0.935, p = 0.000). Thus, anti-Xa activity might be used as a surrogate for apixaban plasma concentration.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be no need for dose adjustments of apixaban; co-administration of LMWH next to apixaban might also be unnecessary.

Performance evaluation of the Sysmex CN-6000-automated coagulation analyzers for routine coagulation tests

The Sysmex CN-6000 is a novel automated multiparameter coagulometer that performs clotting, chromogenic and immunological assays, and platelet aggregation tests in a single system. Here we evaluated its performance of routine coagulation assays. The precision, linearity, carryover and establishment of reference ranges of the CN-6000, as well as correlations between it and the currently used Diagnostica Stago STA-R Max were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The evaluated parameters included prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (FBG), antithrombin (AT), d-dimers (DDi), and fibrin and FBG degradation products (FDP). The intra-run and inter-run precisions of the six tests were determined using normal and pathological control materials; all coefficients of variation were acceptable and within the allowable ranges. The CN-6000 showed excellent linearity for FBG, AT, DDi, and FDP (R = 0.999-1.00). Passing-Bablok regression (R2 > 0.95) demonstrated good agreement between the analyzers. In the carryover study, APTT, PT, FBG, AT, DDi, and FDP values were all acceptable. The establishing reference intervals revealed that each manufacturer's range was acceptable. Significant differences were observed in the APTT reference range because of using different detection systems and reagents. The CN-6000 analyzer showed reliable performance and good correlation with the currently used STA-R Max automated hemostatic analyzer. As CN-6000 uses an optical clot-detection method, its reference ranges for PT and APTT are lower than those of the STA-R Max; thus, the difference should be considered before its use.

Performance evaluation of coaguchek pro II in comparison with coaguchek XS plus and sta-r Max using a sta-neoplastine CI plus

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the analytical performance of CoaguChek Pro II (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), a new point-of-care device measuring the international normalized ratio (INR) values, in comparison with CoaguChek XS Plus (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (Diagnostica Stago SAS, Asnières-sur-Seine, France).

METHODS

The precision of Pro II was analyzed, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI POCT14-A2 and EP15-A3). In 105 clinical samples, the Pro II INR values were compared with those of XS Plus and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (CLSI EP09-A3 and EP35). We also compared the Pro II INR values between capillary blood (CB) and venous blood (VB; CLSI EP35).

RESULTS

The precision of Pro II was acceptable (within-run and between-run CV%: 2.71% and 3.28% at normal level; 1.52% and 4.47% at abnormal level, respectively). The Pro II INR values showed very high correlation and almost perfect agreement with those of XS Plus and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (r = .97 and κ = .94; r = .95 and κ = .91). The mean difference between Pro II and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus increased as INR values increased, with 60% of samples showing differences >0.5 in the supratherapeutic range. The Pro II INR values showed very high correlation between CB and VB (r = .98).

CONCLUSION

Pro II INR values are accurate and reliable using both CB and VB; however, they should be confirmed by laboratory analyzers in the supratherapeutic range.

Prothrombotic hemostasis disturbances in patients with severe COVID-19: Individual daily data

This data article accompanies the manuscript entitled: “Prothrombotic Disturbances of hemostasis of Patients with Severe COVID-19: a Prospective Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study” submitted to Thrombosis Research by the same authors. We report temporal changes of plasma levels of an extended set of laboratory parameters during the ICU stay of the 21 COVID-19 patients included in the monocentre cohort: CRP, platelet count, prothrombin time; Clauss fibrinogen and clotting factors II, V and VIII levels, D-dimers, antithrombin activity, protein C, free protein S, total and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor, PAI-1 levels, von Willebrand factor antigen and activity, ADAMTS-13 (plasma levels); and of two integrative tests of coagulation (thrombin generation with ST Genesia) and fibrinolysis (global fibrinolytic capacity - GFC). Regarding hemostasis, we used double-centrifuged frozen citrated plasma prospectively collected after daily performance of usual coagulation tests. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications were also collected from patient's electronic medical reports.

Evaluation of STA-NeoPTimal, an extraction thromboplastin reagent with ISI close to 1

INTRODUCTION

The prothrombin time (PT) is the most requested test to investigate patients with congenital or acquired coagulopathies or to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy. However, thromboplastins can show markedly different responsiveness to the defects induced by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy and are thus characterized by their ISI (International Sensitivity Index). INR results are optimal for patients under VKA but for patients screened for other reasons expressing PT results as ratio can be more appropriate. As it is very difficult to define the PT results reporting unit from the PT testing request, it would be ideal to use a thromboplastin with ISI = 1. The study aims to compare our reference PT reagent with two candidate thromboplastins with ISI close to 1.

METHODS

We compared 3 different thromplastins: two rabbit brain extracted based reagents (STA-Neoplastine CI Plus, with ISI = 1.26, routinely used in our laboratory and STA-NeoPTimal with ISI = 1.01) and a recombinant thromboplastin (STA-Neoplastine R with ISI = 0.97). The comparison was done on 175 samples: 75 from individuals without coagulation defects and 100 from patients under VKA.

RESULTS

STA-NeoPTimal and STA-Neoplastine R well correlate to our reference, STA-Neoplastine CI Plus: regression equations are y = 1.186x-0.1351, r²  = .9454 and y = 1.1432x-0.1554, r²  = .9951, respectively. The lowest bias on INR results was obtained with STA-NeoPTimal reagent (interval: -0.7/+0.4).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that STA-NeoPTimal can be used in the laboratory as it gives results comparable to those obtained with STA-Neoplastine CI Plus. Besides, thanks to its ISI = 1, it guarantees reporting a PT ratio equal to INR which avoids errors.