Sex-based differences in screening and recognition of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes in pediatric primary care

Paediatric obesity: Documentation, screening, and pharmacotherapy in a national cohort

BACKGROUND

Multiple organizations have published guidelines for the screening and treatment of obesity and related comorbidities in youth, including the use of anti-obesity medications (AOM). This study aimed to determine which paediatric patients: (1) receive a diagnostic code for obesity; (2) are most likely to be screened for hyperlipidaemia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus; and (3) are most likely to be prescribed AOM.

METHODS

A cohort of 35 898 patients 9 years 4 months to 17 years 6 months of age with a BMI > 30 or greater than the 95th% on three separate outpatient encounters was generated using the TriNetX database. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between demographics in the study population and the likelihood of diagnosis of obesity, screening for comorbidities, and prescription of AOMs.

RESULTS

Asian, Black, and Hispanic youths had increased odds of having a diagnosis of obesity and being screened for all three comorbidities. Documentation of obesity was associated with increased odds of screening for all comorbidities. Female sex, documentation of obesity, and higher BMIs were associated with increased odds of being prescribed AOMs. Black and Native American races decreased the likelihood of being prescribed AOM.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of obesity in terms of documentation of disease, screening for comorbidities, and initiation of AOM continues to fall short of the guidelines put forth by multiple organizations. Race/ethnicity, sex, and BMI correlate with differences in care provided to obese paediatric patients. Further research is needed to identify the barriers to and causes of these disparities.

Prospective Test Performance of Nonfasting Biomarkers to Identify Dysglycemia in Children and Adolescents

INTRODUCTION

Test performance screening measures for dysglycemia have not been evaluated prospectively in youth. This study evaluated the prospective test performance of random glucose (RG), 1-h nonfasting glucose challenge test (1-h GCT), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fructosamine (FA), and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) for identifying dysglycemia.

METHODS

Youth ages 8-17 years with overweight or obesity (body mass index, BMI, ≥85th percentile) without known diabetes completed nonfasting tests at baseline (n = 176) and returned an average of 1.1 years later for two formal fasting 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests. Outcomes included glucose-defined dysglycemia (fasting plasma glucose ≥100 mg/dL or 2-h plasma glucose ≥140 mg/dL) or elevated HbA1c (≥5.7%). Longitudinal test performance was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculation of area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Glucose-defined dysglycemia, elevated HbA1c, and either dysglycemia or elevated HbA1c were present in 15 (8.5%), 11 (6.3%), and 23 (13.1%) participants at baseline, and 16 (9.1%), 18 (10.3%), and 28 (15.9%) participants at follow-up. For prediction of glucose-defined dysglycemia at follow-up, RG, 1-h GCT, and HbA1c had similar performance (0.68 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.84)), while FA and 1,5-AG performed poorly. For prediction of HbA1c at follow-up, baseline HbA1c had strong performance (AUC 0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.98]), RG had moderate performance (AUC 0.67 [95% CI: 0.54-0.79]), while 1-h GCT, FA, and 1,5-AG performed poorly.

CONCLUSION

HbA1c and nonfasting glucose tests had reasonable longitudinal discrimination identifying adolescents at risk for dysglycemia, but performance depended on outcome definition.

Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults

Background

National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also examined the incidence of prediabetes and diabetes in adherent and non-adherent individuals.

Methods

Our study is based on a retrospective population-level inception cohort of adults aged 40-79 years without pre-existing diabetes or cardiovascular disease on April 1, 2013. Adherence during a 3-year screening period (2013-2016) and prediabetes and diabetes during a 4-year follow-up period were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the adjusted association between sex and adherence.

Findings

Among 1,380,697 individuals (49·2% male, 50·8% female) adherence rates were 69·9% in males and 79·8% in females. Sex-differences in adherence were largest in younger individuals (58·0% and 72·6% and in males and females aged 40-44 years, respectively) and consistent across rural/urban residence and material deprivation. Females were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio 1·92; 95% confidence interval 1·89 to 1·95) than males. Prediabetes and diabetes rates among individuals who adhered to screening guidelines were 15·7% and 2·6% among males and 13·4% and 1·5% among females. During the follow-up period, an additional 3·2% and 1·9% of adherent males and females had diabetes. Incidence rates of prediabetes and diabetes during the follow-up period among individuals who did not adhere to screening guidelines were 8·8% and 2·1% among males and 7·3% and 1·3% among females.

Interpretation

Adherence to diabetes screening guidelines is sub-optimal, especially among young males. Despite lower rates of adherence to screening, males have higher rates of prediabetes and diabetes compared to females. There is a need for education campaigns to improve diabetes screening rates in young adults, especially males.

Funding

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Sex and Gender Science Chair (Recipient: Kaul).