Risk stratification using Bmi-1 and Snail expression is a useful prognostic tool for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma

E-Cadherin expression in human tumors: a tissue microarray study on 10,851 tumors

BACKGROUND

The E-Cadherin gene (CDH1, Cadherin 1), located at 16q22.1 encodes for a calcium-dependent membranous glycoprotein with an important role in cellular adhesion and polarity maintenance.

METHODS

To systematically determine E-Cadherin protein expression in normal and cancerous tissues, 14,637 tumor samples from 112 different tumor types and subtypes as well as 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format.

RESULTS

E-Cadherin was strongly expressed in normal epithelial cells of most organs. From 77 tumor entities derived from cell types normally positive for E-Cadherin, 35 (45.5%) retained at least a weak E-Cadherin immunostaining in ≥99% of cases and 61 (79.2%) in ≥90% of cases. Tumors with the highest rates of E-Cadherin loss included Merkel cell carcinoma, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, lobular carcinoma of the breast, and sarcomatoid and small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Reduced E-Cadherin expression was linked to higher grade (p = 0.0009), triple negative receptor status (p = 0.0336), and poor prognosis (p = 0.0466) in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type, triple negative receptor status in lobular carcinoma of the breast (p = 0.0454), advanced pT stage (p = 0.0047) and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer (p < 0.0001), and was more common in recurrent than in primary prostate cancer (p < 0.0001). Of 29 tumor entities derived from E-Cadherin negative normal tissues, a weak to strong E-Cadherin staining could be detected in at least 10% of cases in 15 different tumor entities (51.7%). Tumors with the highest frequency of E-Cadherin upregulation included various subtypes of testicular germ cell tumors and renal cell carcinomas (RCC). E-Cadherin upregulation was more commonly seen in malignant than in benign soft tissue tumors (p = 0.0104) and was associated with advanced tumor stage (p = 0.0276) and higher grade (p = 0.0035) in clear cell RCC, and linked to advanced tumor stage (p = 0.0424) and poor prognosis in papillary RCC (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

E-Cadherin is consistently expressed in various epithelial cancers. Down-regulation or loss of E-Cadherin expression in cancers arising from E-Cadherin positive tissues as well as E-Cadherin neo-expression in cancers arising from E-Cadherin negative tissues is linked to cancer progression and may reflect tumor dedifferentiation.

Does reduced E-cadherin expression correlate with poor prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

E-cadherin has emerged as a prognostic factor of urothelial cell carcinoma. In the present work we investigate the relationship between expression of E-cadherin and clinical outcomes, following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies published until July 2017.

RESULT

Six studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 1014 patients. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence-free survivor was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.09, I = 63%, P = .04). Also, reduced E-cadherin was not significantly associated with poor cancer-specific survivor (pooled HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.66-1.43, I = 54%, P = .11). The pooled HR for overall survivor was not statistically significant (pooled HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.32-1.46, I = 80%, P = .007). The results of the Begg and Egger tests suggested that publication bias was not evident in this meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced E-cadherin expression did not appear to be significantly associated with disease prognosis after nephroureterectomy in the meta-analysis. However, further high quality, prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.

Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study was performed to identify the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant studies. The outcomes of interest, including progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were extracted, and the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for effect size estimation. Subgroup, metaregression, and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore potential origins of heterogeneity. Publication bias was estimated by Egger's linear regression and funnel plot. Our meta-analysis included a total of 27 studies involving 17,453 patients. The pooled HRs were statistically significant for PFS (HR = 1.73, 95%CI = 1.41–2.11), CSS (HR = 1.87, 95%CI = 1.54–2.27), and OS (HR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.29–1.87), with high heterogeneity (I² = 77.8%, 70.3%, and 59.2%, respectively). Four studies explored the prognostic value of LVI in patients with advanced tumor stages (T3–T4). The fixed effects model (I² = 33.9%) showed that the pooled HR was 1.64 (95%CI = 1.35–1.99) for CSS. Egger's plots showed no significant publication bias (PFS: P = 0.443, CSS: P = 0.096, and OS: P = 0.894). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that LVI is a poor prognostic factor for UTUC and is strongly associated with disease recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality.