Enteral tube feeding of patients with acute stroke: when does the risk of diarrhoea increase?

Effects of enteral nutrition in stroke: an updated review

Stroke is a leading cause of death and functional decline that places a significant burden on healthcare systems. Malnutrition is a critical clinical concern that complicates the condition of stroke patients and contributes to unfavorable outcomes. Dysphagia is the primary cause of malnutrition in the acute stage after stroke. Enteral nutrition (EN) has been employed to manage the nutritional status of stroke patients to prevent and treat malnutrition. Early EN (EEN) has been shown to reduce mortality and the prevalence of malnutrition while enhancing functional outcomes. In the majority of cases requiring nutritional support, nasogastric tube (NGT) placement is prioritized. However, under specific circumstances, direct enteral tube (DET) feeding that includes percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), offers distinct advantages, particularly for PEG. Compared to intermittent EN, continuous EN demonstrates better tolerance. An EN protocol providing sufficient nutrient supply and energy support can alleviate neurological deficits and reduce the severity of motor dysfunction in stroke patients, thereby improving their prognosis. Energy-rich formulations of EN and EEN may be associated with a lower incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). However, the use of EN may lead to an increased incidence of digestive complications, and hyperglycemia. In this study, we reviewed the indications, opportunities, and management methods for EN application, along with the nutrient composition of nutritional protocols for stroke patients.

Research trends in nutritional interventions for stroke: a bibliometric analysis and literature review

Background

Over the past 23 years, there has been a thorough analysis of literature concerning nutritional interventions, nutrients, and feeding approaches related to stroke. Furthermore, a scientific knowledge map was established, elucidating the current state of research, examining its development and trends, and offering new research viewpoints for the future. This study aimed to investigate global and emerging research trends in nutritional interventions for stroke from 2000 to 2023 through bibliometric analysis.

Methods

A bibliometric analysis of literature from the Core Collection of Scientific Networks for the years 2000-2022 was conducted. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and bibliometric graphical software were used to identify major contributors to publications, including authors, countries, institutions, journals, references, and keywords.

Results

The bibliometric analysis yielded a total of 464 publications. This is a gradually increasing number in terms of the number of publications during the study period. China had the highest number of publications. Clinical Nutrition" was the journal with the highest number of relevant publications, and the most commonly used keywords were "stroke," "nutrition" and "malnutrition."

Conclusion

These analyses reveal research trends in nutritional therapy for stroke from 2000 to 2023 and point to prospective research frontiers. This study provides a deeper understanding of what nutritional treatment of stroke entails and provides guidance and support for future research in this area.

Enteral Nutrition and Hydration in Patients with Acute Stroke: Efficacy of an Automatic Pump System for Water Administration and Flushes-A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition is often prescribed in acute stroke to meet energy and fluid needs in patients with dysphagia. Tubes clogging represent a common complication of enteral formula delivery, requiring substitution and influencing nutrition administration. Frequent water flushes are recommended as one of the most effective procedures to prevent tube occlusion, but it might be time demanding and not consistently performed by the healthcare staff. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of an automatic flush pump, compared to a manual flush system, to prevent tubes' occlusions in acute-stroke patients, as this might affect nutrition and hydration.

METHODS

Gastrointestinal symptoms, nutrition and hydration biomarkers were also monitored to determine the different devices' safety. Sixty-two patients were included in the study and allocated to the "manual" or "automatic" flushes device.

RESULTS

The mean duration of data collection was 7 ± 2 days. Tube occlusions occurred in 22.6% of the patients in the "manual" group, whereas only one tube clogging was reported in the "automatic" group (p = 0.023). No significant differences between groups were reported for constipation and diarrhea frequency nor nutrition and hydration status. When the nurses were asked to simulate manual flush administration at the same frequency of the automatic device, they were able to meet the recommendations only 10% of the time.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests the efficacy of automatic flush systems to prevent enteral tube clogging, without affecting health status compared to standard manual flush systems.

Related Factor Analysis and Nursing Strategies of Diarrhea in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Nutrition

Objective. To explore the related factors of diarrhea in critically ill patients with enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods. This single-center retrospective study analyzed the occurrence of intolerant diarrhea in ICU patients receiving EN treatment in our hospital. By collecting clinical data, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors for diarrhea. Results. Among 120 patients included in the study, 68 (48.33%) had diarrhea. Age (OR = 2.599, $P=0.027$ ), use of antibiotics (OR = 3.496, $P=0.007$ ), ICU hospitalization time (OR = 1.311, $P=0.001$ ), and mechanical ventilation time (OR = 1.273, $P=0.035$ ) were all independent risk factors for diarrhea in EN. Conclusion. Older age, frequent use of antibiotics, long ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation time can lead to diarrhea in ICU patients receiving EN treatment. It is necessary to effectively analyze the above independent factors and implement targeted interventions to improve the incidence of diarrhea in patients.

Risk Factors and Predictive Model of Diarrhea Among Patients with Severe Stroke

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors and predictive model of diarrhea among patients with severe stroke.

METHODS

The study analyzed the retrospective clinical data of patients with new-onset stroke who had been admitted to the intensive care unit at the Department of Neurology of X Hospital, between September 2017 and April 2018. All data were analyzed with a binary logistic regression, and a logistic regression equation was used to build a predictive model of diarrhea among patients with severe stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients with severe stroke were included in this study, including 45 patients (29.41%) with diarrhea. The binary logistic multivariate analysis showed that the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.123; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.016-1.242), the Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission (OR, 1.563; 95% CI, 1.048-2.330), antibiotic use (OR, 2.168; 95% CI, 1.041-4.514), gavage feeding time (OR, 1.260; 95% CI, 1.098-1.445), and hospital stay before the occurrence of diarrhea (OR, 0.652; 95% CI, 0.552-0.770). The receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.862 (95% CI, 0.799-0.925), the specificity was 0.778, and the sensitivity was 0.843.

CONCLUSIONS

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission, the Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission, antibiotic use, gavage feeding time, and hospital stay before the occurrence of diarrhea independently predict diarrhea among patients with severe stroke. This model can be used to predict the risk of diarrhea among patients with severe stroke.

Machine learning analysis to identify the association between risk factors and onset of nosocomial diarrhea: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although several risk factors for nosocomial diarrhea have been identified, the detail of association between these factors and onset of nosocomial diarrhea, such as degree of importance or temporal pattern of influence, remains unclear. We aimed to determine the association between risk factors and onset of nosocomial diarrhea using machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of patients with acute cerebral infarction. Seven variables, including age, sex, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and number of days of antibiotics, tube feeding, proton pump inhibitors, and histamine 2-receptor antagonist use, were used in the analysis. We split the data into a training dataset and independant test dataset. Based on the training dataset, we developed a random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and radial basis function (RBF) network model. By calculating an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve using 5-fold cross-validation, we performed feature selection and hyperparameter optimization in each model. According to their final performances, we selected the optimal model and also validated it in the independent test dataset. Based on the selected model, we visualized the variable importance and the association between each variable and the outcome using partial dependence plots.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and eighteen patients were included. In the cross-validation within the training dataset, the random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.944, which was higher than in the SVM and RBF network models. The random forest model also achieved an AUC of 0.832 in the independent test dataset. Tube feeding use days, mRS score, antibiotic use days, age and sex were strongly associated with the onset of nosocomial diarrhea, in this order. Tube feeding use had an inverse U-shaped association with the outcome. The mRS score and age had a convex downward and increasing association, while antibiotic use had a convex upward association with the outcome.

CONCLUSION

We revealed the degree of importance and temporal pattern of the influence of several risk factors for nosocomial diarrhea, which could help clinicians manage nosocomial diarrhea.

The Effect of Enteral Tube Feeding on Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review

Patients with functional gastrointestinal tract who are unable to meet their nutritional requirements may benefit from the use of enteral nutrition via feeding tubes which could be nasogastric, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Although enteral tube feeding has been shown to promote nutritional status, improve wound healing, and enhance patients’ quality of life (QoL), evidence of tube and feed complications and reduced QoL has also been reported. Despite the increasing prevalence of patients on enteral tube feeding, no systematic review examining the role of enteral tube feeding on patients’ QoL appears to have been published. Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of enteral tube feeding on patients’ QoL. Method: Three databases (EMBASE, Pubmed, and PsycINFO) plus Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) framework. The review was in line with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and involved the use of synonyms and medical subject headings. In addition, search terms were combined using Boolean operators (AND/OR) and all the articles retrieved were exported to EndNote for de-duplication. Results: Fourteen articles which met the criteria were included and three distinct areas were identified: the effect of early versus late enteral tube feeding on QoL; the QoL of patients on gastrostomy versus standard care, and the effect of enteral tube feeding on QoL. Overall, nine studies reported improvement in the QoL of patients on enteral tube feeding, while five studies demonstrated either no significant difference or reduction in QoL. Some factors which may have influenced these outcomes are differences in types of gastrostomy tubes, enteral feeding methods (including time patients spent connected to enteral feed/pump), and patients’ medical conditions, as well as the generic and/or type of QoL measuring instrument used. Conclusion: Most reviewed studies suggest that enteral tube feeding is effective in improving patients’ QoL. The use of enteral tube feeding-specific QoL measuring instruments is recommended for future research, and improved management strategies including use of mobile enteral feeding pumps should further enhance patients’ QoL. More studies on the effect of delivery systems/enteral feeding pumps on QoL are needed as research in this area is limited.

The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

23 trials containing 6478 patients met our inclusion criteria.

INTERVENTION

A systematical literature search was conducted to identify eligible trials in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was mortality, the secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal complications, bloodstream infections, organ failures, length of stay in ICU and hospital. We performed a predefined subgroup analyses to explore the treatment effect by mean age, publication date and disease types.

MAIN RESULTS

The result showed no significant effect on overall mortality rate (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.18, P = 0.83, I2 = 19%) and organ failure rate (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.01, P = 0.06, I2 = 16%). The use of EN had more beneficial effects with fewer bloodstream infections when compared to PN (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.82, P = 0.001, I2 = 27%) and this was more noteworthy in the subgroup analysis for critical surgical patients (OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.59, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). EN was associated with reduction in hospital LOS (MD -0.90, 95%CI -1.63 to -0.17, P = 0.21, I2 = 0%) but had an increase incidence of gastrointestinal complications (OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.76 to 2.27, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

For critically ill patients, the two routes of nutrition support had no different effect on mortality rate. The use of EN could decrease the incidence of bloodstream infections and reduce hospital LOS but was associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications.

The effect of a natural food based tube feeding in minimizing diarrhea in critically ill neurological patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Diarrhea has negative consequences for patients, health care staff and health care costs when neurological patients are fed enterally over long periods. We examined the effect of tube feeding with natural foods in reducing the number of fluid stool evacuations and diarrhea in critically ill neurological patients.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, open-label and randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at facilities in Germany specializing in early rehabilitation after neurological damage. Patients of the INTERVENTION group were fed by tube using a commercially available product based on real foods such as milk, meat, carrots, whereas CONTROL patients received a standard tube-feed made of powdered raw materials. All received enteral nutrition over a maximum of 30 days. The number of defecations and the consistency of each stool according to the Bristol Stool Chart (BSC) were monitored. In addition, daily calories, liquids and antibiotic-use were recorded.

RESULTS

118 Patients who had suffered ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury or hypoxic brain damage and requiring enteral nutrition were enrolled; 59 were randomized to receive the intervention and 59 control feed. There were no significant differences in clinical screening data, age, sex, observation period or days under enteral nutrition between the groups. Patients in both groups received equivalent amount of calories and fluids. In both groups antibiotics were frequently prescribed (69.5% in the INTERVENTION group and 75.7% in the CONTROL group) for 10-11 days on average. In comparison to the CONTROL group, patients in the INTERVENTION group had a significant reduction of the number of watery stool evacuations (type 7 BSC) (minus 61%, IRR = 0.39, p < 0.001). Further statistical evaluations using the following corrections: major diarrhea-associated confounders (number and duration of antibiotics); shorter observation period of 15 days; excluding patients with Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) and the Per Protocol Population, confirmed the primary hypothesis. The number of days with diarrhea was significantly lower in the INTERVENTION group (0.8 ± 1.60 days versus 2.0 ± 3.46 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Tube feeding with natural based food was effective in reducing the number of watery defecations and diarrhea in long term tube-fed critically ill neurological patients, compared to those fed with standard tube feeding.

The Use of Enteral Nutrition in the Management of Stroke

This article discusses the use of enteral nutrition in the management of stroke. Stroke is a major source of disability, including dysphagia. The clinical manifestation of swallowing difficulties in stroke patients may lead to malnutrition which has implications for health status and clinical outcomes including morbidity, mortality and cost to the health service. The prevalence of malnutrition following an acute stroke could range from 8% to 34%. Therefore, the need to develop and implement the use of enteral nutrition support in stroke patients becomes pertinent. A range of enteral feeding tubes and feeding methods may be used to support stroke patients who are unable to meet their nutritional requirements through oral intake alone, although each of these approaches has its merits and limitations. Based on this review, there is evidence that enteral nutrition support is a useful method of providing nutrition for patients with dysphagia following a stroke in order to enhance their nutritional status and promote their health. However, there are challenges in the use of enteral tube feeding in these patients.

Fiber, prebiotics, and diarrhea: what, why, when and how

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dietary fiber and prebiotics have been the focus of research and discussion for decades, but there are still pending concepts and definitions, in particular when addressing their use in the prevention and treatment of diarrhea. The purpose of this review is to present the latest advances in the understanding of dietary fiber and prebiotics, to review their proven role in the management of diarrhea, and to postulate the best timings and optimal doses.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of prebiotics has encompassed not only prevention but also the treatment of distinct types of diarrhea, at different treatment moments, and with regard to various different markers of outcome. Furthermore, the description of soluble fibers claiming to be prebiotics, and vice versa, has too often been the tone in the literature, which has led to misconceptions in classification and, consequently, confusion over the interpretation of results. It remains difficult to establish a consensus about the real impact of fiber and prebiotics on the prevention and therapy of diarrhea.

SUMMARY

The review highlights the overlapping concepts of fiber and prebiotics, and supports the need for adequate individualization of their use, according to the goal - either prevention or treatment of diarrhea - as well as the optimal timing and dose to be used. Nonetheless, viscous soluble fibers seem to be the best option in treating diarrhea, whereas prebiotics are more important in preventing and avoiding recurrence.

Low-FODMAP formula improves diarrhea and nutritional status in hospitalized patients receiving enteral nutrition: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial

Background

Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates that play an important role in inducing functional gut symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet improves abdominal symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. However, there were no study for the effect of FODMAP content on gastrointestinal intolerance and nutritional status in patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN).

Methods

In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 14-day clinical trial, eligible hospitalized patients receiving EN (n = 100) were randomly assigned to three groups; 84 patients completed the trial (low-FODMAP EN, n = 30; moderate-FODMAP EN, n = 28; high-FODMAP EN, n = 26). Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were measured; stool assessment was performed using the King’s Stool Chart and clinical definition.

Results

Baseline values were not significantly different among the three groups. After the 14-day intervention, diarrhea significantly improved in the low-FODMAP group than in the moderate- and high-FODMAP groups (P < 0.05). King’s Stool scores in diarrhea subjects were significantly and steadily reduced in the low-FODMAP group compared with the other two groups (P for time and EN type interaction <0.05). BMI increased significantly in the low- and high-FODMAP groups during the intervention (P < 0.05 for both), and showed a trend toward increasing in the moderate-FODMAP group (P < 0.10). Serum prealbumin increased significantly in all groups by 14-day; by 3-day, it had increased to the levels at 14-day in the low-FODMAP group. At 14-day, serum transferrin had increased significantly in the moderate-FODMAP group. In addition, subjects were classified by final condition (unimproved, normal maintenance, diarrhea only improved, constipation only improved, and recurrent diarrhea/constipation improved). Seventy-five percent of the diarrhea improved group consumed the low-FODMAP EN formula. 38.5 and 46.2 % of recurrent diarrhea/constipation improved group consumed the low- and moderate-FODMAP EN respectively. BMI significantly increased in all groups except the unimproved. Prealbumin levels significantly increased in the diarrhea-improved and recurrent diarrhea/constipation groups at 3-day and continued by 14-day, and in the constipation-improved group at 14-day. Transferrin levels significantly increased in the diarrhea-improved and recurrent diarrhea/constipation groups at 14-day.

Conclusion

Low-FODMAP EN may improve diarrhea, leading to improved nutritional status and facilitating prompt recovery from illness.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12937-015-0106-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Preventing diarrhoea in enteral nutrition: the impact of the delivery set hang time

BACKGROUND

To meet the current recommendations for enteral tube feeding (ETF), we updated our previous practice in 2011 and began to use a 24-h delivery set hang time (DSHT). We evaluated the impact of this update on the risk of diarrhoea and in diarrhoea-free survival.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective study with historical controls on ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke patients undergoing ETF. Diarrhoea occurrence (≥ 3 liquid stools in 24 h) was compared between patients with a 24 h DSHT (2011-2014) and a 72/96 h DSHT (2010-2011). The analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients were included [median age 81 years (IQR = 12), 46.9% males], 103 in the group with a 24 h DSHT and 72 in the group with a 72/96 h DSHT. The group with a 24 h DSHT had a lower diarrhoea frequency (13.6% vs. 34.7%, risk ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.70, p = 0.001) and a lower diarrhoea incidence rate (0.87 vs. 2.32 cases of diarrhoea/100 patient*day, rate ratio: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19-0.72, p = 0.004). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a longer diarrhoea-free survival for this group (p = 0.003, log-rank test). A 24 h DSHT was associated with a lower risk of diarrhoea (HR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.61, p = 0.002), adjusted by albumin, stroke severity, intravenous thrombolysis, the administration of clindamycin and cefotaxime, and the administration of an enteral formula for diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The 24 h DSHT was independently associated with a lower risk of diarrhoea and longer diarrhoea-free survival in hospitalised patients with acute stroke under ETF, compared with a 72/96 h DSHT.