Building a sustainable clinical academic workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of Australia and New Zealand: report from the first summit meeting

Barriers to Clinical Academic Surgical Training and Career Development in the United Kingdom: A Review from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) Group

Clinical academics play a vital role in advancing medical research, knowledge and treatments within the National Health System (NHS), but this career's sustainability is at risk due to barriers to accessing and pursuing research opportunities throughout a surgeon's training and career. Despite the diversification of surgical training with integrated opportunities, challenges such as limited training opportunities, lack of protected research time, and financial constraints persist. This paper from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) group highlights these issues, addressing the competitiveness of academic pathways, workload balance, mentorship importance, and the need for standardised assessments. It highlights the need for greater accountability from healthcare employers and academic institutions. Additionally, the paper focuses on increasing diversity and inclusion in clinical academia, addressing systemic discrimination, and changing the NHS culture. This paper calls for collective efforts from the medical profession, government, and institutions to address these issues.

Students' and educators' perceptions of clinical academic pathways in the UK: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to understand the experiences and perceptions of medical students and medical educators regarding barriers and facilitators for pursuing clinical academic pathways.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups was conducted. A reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Theoretical and snowball sampling approaches were applied for participant recruitment.

SETTING

University of Manchester and NHS Trusts in the Greater Manchester region.

PARTICIPANTS

The sample of this study was composed of 43 participants, including medical and dental students, clinical academics, clinicians and stakeholders.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: Theme 1: Knowledge of the CA pathway; Theme 2: The costs linked to pursuing a clinical academic pathway; Theme 3: Exposure to and time for research.

CONCLUSIONS

While institutions offer opportunities for research experience, there is a need for extended and more tailored opportunities and information, and the overall cost of training for students reduces the attractiveness of the clinical academic pathway.

Patient Complexity, Social Factors, and Hospitalization Outcomes at Academic and Community Hospitals

Importance

There have been limited evaluations of the patients treated at academic and community hospitals. Understanding differences between academic and community hospitals has relevance for the design of clinical models of care, remuneration for clinical services, and health professional training programs.

Objective

To evaluate differences in complexity and clinical outcomes between patients admitted to general medical wards at academic and community hospitals.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to general medicine at 28 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, was conducted between April 2015 and December 2021. All patients admitted to or discharged from general medicine during the study period who were older than 18 years were included. Data analysis occurred between February 2023 and June 2024.

Exposures

Patient admission to a general medicine inpatient service at an academic or community hospital.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, modified Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score [mLAPS], discharge diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, frailty risk score, and disability), social factors (neighborhood-level markers of income, material deprivation, immigrant status, and racial and ethnic minority status) and clinical outcomes and processes (patient volume per physician, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, readmission rates, and intensive care unit [ICU] admission rates).

Results

There were 947 070 admissions, including 609 696 at 17 community hospitals (median [IQR] age, 73 [58-84] years) and 337 374 at 11 academic hospitals (median [IQR] age, 70 [56-82] years). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar at community and academic hospitals, including female sex (307 381 [50.4%] vs 168 033 [49.8%]; standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.012), median (IQR) mLAPS (21 [11-36] vs 21 [10-34]; SMD = 0.001), and Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2 or greater (182 171 [29.9%] vs 105 502 [31.3%]; SMD = 0.038). Social characteristics, including income, education, and neighborhood proportion of racial and ethnic minority and immigrant residents were also similar. The number of unique discharge diagnoses was similar at academic and community hospitals. Patient volumes per attending physician were higher at academic hospitals (median [IQR] daily census, 20 [19-22] vs 17 [15-19]; SMD = 1.086). After multivariable regression adjusting for baseline factors, mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.17), ICU admission rate (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.79) and length of stay (β =  -0.001; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.10) were not significantly different, while 7-day readmission (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.43) and 30-day readmission (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.42) were significantly higher at academic hospitals than community hospitals.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, patients admitted to general medicine at academic and community hospitals had similar baseline clinical characteristics and generally similar clinical outcomes, with greater readmission rates in academic hospitals. These findings suggest that the patient case mix in general internal medicine that trainees would be exposed to during their residency training at academic hospitals is largely representative of the case mix they would encounter at community hospitals, and has important implications for health services planning and funding.

Academic dermatology in Australia and New Zealand between 2017 and 2022: A cross‐sectional bibliometric analysis

INTRODUCTION

Academic dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand provide high-quality and meaningful contributions to the understanding of disease and therapeutic translational research. Concerns have been raised by the Australian Medical Association regarding the decline of clinical academics in Australia as a whole, however, such trends in scholarly output have not previously been analysed for Australasian dermatologists.

METHODS

A bibliometric analysis of dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand was conducted in January and February 2023. Available Scopus profiles for all dermatologists were used to measure lifetime H index, scholarly output, citation counts and field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) in the last 5 years (2017-2022). Trends in output over time were measured using non-parametric tests. Differences in output between subgroups stratified by gender and academic leadership positions (associate professor or professor) were measured using Wilcoxon rank-sum and one-way ANOVA tests. The scholarly output of recent College graduates was also analysed as a subgroup, comparing the same bibliographic variables in the 5 years preceding and 5 years following awarding of their fellowships.

RESULTS

From the 463 practising dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand, 372 (80%) were successfully matched to Scopus researcher profiles. Of these dermatologists, 167 were male (45%) and 205 (55%) were female, and 31 (8%) held academic leadership positions. Most dermatologists (67%) published at least one paper in the last 5 years. The median lifetime H index was 4, and between 2017 and 2022 median scholarly output was 3, the median citations were 14 and the median FWCI was 0.64. There was a non-significant trend towards fewer publications per year, however, citation count and FWCI decreased significantly. By subgroups, female dermatologists published significantly more papers between 2017 and 2022, and other bibliographic variables were comparable to male dermatologists. However, women were underrepresented in positions of academic leadership-comprising only 32% of this cohort despite representing 55% of dermatologists. Professors were also significantly more likely to have higher bibliographic outcomes than associate professors. Finally, analysis of recent College graduates highlighted a significant decline in bibliometric outcomes pre- and post-fellowship.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our analysis identifies a trend towards decreased research output by dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand in the last 5 years. Strategies to support dermatologists in research endeavours, particularly women and recent graduates, will be essential in maintaining strong scholarly output among Australasian dermatologists and thereby sustaining optimal evidence-based patient care.

Publication in the Australian medical student journal is associated with future academic success: a matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND

Medical student journals (MSJs) help to introduce the fundamentals of academic research and publication to future doctors. It has recently been shown that MSJs can influence doctors' future academic and professional success, however these findings have not been replicated in an Australian cohort. The aim of this study was to examine the association between publication in the Australian Medical Student Journal (AMSJ) and markers of a student's future academic trajectory, including future publication, attainment of higher academic degree or entry into specialist training.

METHODS

Articles authored by medical students in the AMSJ from 2010 to 2015 were retrospectively identified. A list of these student authors was made, with university- and year- matched control students randomly selected from university graduation databases. For all students, data related to academic success were obtained from multiple sources including PubMed®, Google, university databases and author affiliation information from publications. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model was used to assess correlation between variables. The primary outcome measure was the number of postgraduate PubMed®-indexed publications. Secondary outcome measures included attainment of higher degree or faculty position. Clinical speciality was also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-five AMSJ authors (14 case reports, 17 original research, 21 review articles) from 14 Australian universities were included. Publication in the AMSJ was associated with future PubMed® indexed publications (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.74-6.77, P < 0.001) and higher degree attainment (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.99-8.22, P = 0.0001). AMSJ authors were also significantly more likely to enter into surgical training (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.10-5.84, P = 0.029). A multivariable conditional logistic regression model demonstrated that publication in the AMSJ was predictive of future PubMed indexed publication, independent of higher degree or faculty position attainment (OR 2.56, CI 1.22-5.39, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We have shown that publication in a MSJ is associated with markers of academic success in an Australian cohort. PubMed®-indexed publications, attainment of a Masters degree, and entry in to surgical training were all significantly correlated to AMSJ publication. A conditional logistic regression model demonstrated that medical student publication in the AMSJ influences the number of future PubMed®-indexed publications, independent of major academic confounding variables.

A Survey of Resources and Nursing Workforce for Clinical Research Delivery in Paediatric Intensive Care Within the UK / Ireland

Introduction

Clinical research within Paediatric Intensive Care (PICU) is necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality associated within this resource-intensive environment. With UK PICUs encouraged to be research-active there was a drive to understand how centres support research delivery.

Aim

To identify the research workforce available within UK/Ireland PICUs to support clinical research delivery.

Method

An electronic survey, endorsed by the Paediatric Critical Care Society (PCCS), was designed and reported in accordance with CHERRIES guidelines. The survey was distributed by email to all UK/Ireland Nurse Managers and Medical/ Nursing Research leads, aiming for one response per site during the period of April-June 2021. Only one response per site was included in analysis.

Results

44 responses were received, representing 24/30 UK/Ireland sites (80% response rate). Responses from n = 21/30 units are included (three excluded for insufficient data). 90% (n = 19/21) units were research active, although only 52% (n = 11) had permanent research roles funded within their staffing establishment. The majority of units (n = 18, 86%) had less than two WTE research nurses. Resources were felt to be sufficient for current research delivery by 43% of units (n = 9), but this confidence diminished to 19% (n = 4) when considering their ability to support future research. The top barriers to research conduct were insufficiently funded/unfunded studies (52%; n = 11), clinical staff too busy to support research activity (52%; n = 11) and short-term/fixed-term contracts for research staff (38%; n = 8).

Conclusion

Despite the perceived importance of research and 90% of responding UK/Ireland PICUs being research active, the majority have limited resources to support research delivery. This has implications for their ability to participate in future multi-centre trials and opportunities to support the development of future medical/nursing clinical academics. Further work is required to identify optimum models of clinical research delivery.

Interventions and strategies aimed at clinical academic pathway development for nurses in the United Kingdom: A systematised review of the literature

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To review interventions and strategies designed to progress UK clinical academic career pathways in nursing and identify barriers and facilitators to aid wider implementation.

BACKGROUND

For over a decade, the UK political agenda has promoted the entry of nurses into clinical academic roles. Partnerships between the National Health Service and academia are known to increase nursing recruitment, retention and quality of care. However, there remains a lack of nurses working in these partnership roles.

DESIGN

A systematised review was conducted. An electronic database search was carried out in PubMed, CINAHL, the British Nursing Database and PsychInfo for articles published between September 2006 to June 2020. A narrative approach to data synthesis was used, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Ten papers were included in the review. The authors reported a range of programmes, pathways and toolkits. Pathway outcome measures included numbers of nurses recruited onto clinical academic programmes, clinical academic programmes completed, nursing research outputs, impact on clinical practice and impact on nursing recruitment. Barriers and facilitators to pathway development included funding, clinical and research time constraints, infrastructure, strong and strategic clinical academic leadership and effective partnership working. The quality of the included studies was mixed; more high-quality, evidence-based programmes need to be developed and rigorously evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings can inform nursing clinical academic research pathway development internationally, by identifying key drivers for success. Sustained and cohesive implementation of clinical academic research pathways is lacking across the UK.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Strong, strategic leadership is required to enable progression of clinical academic nursing research pathway opportunities. Clinical nursing practitioners need to collaborate with external partners to enable development of clinical academic pathways within the nursing profession; this can lead to improvements in patient care and high-quality clinical outcomes.

Clinical academic research internships for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals: a qualitative evaluation

BACKGROUND

Nurses, midwives and allied health professionals are integral to research, yet rarely engage simultaneously in research and clinical practice. Clinical academic internships offer a route for accessing academic research training.

AIM

To determine facilitators and barriers to nurses' participation and engagement in research internships, and to suggest improvements for future programmes.

DISCUSSION

The experiences of ten health professional research interns were explored, using a method based on a synthesis between grounded theory and content analysis. Four categories emerged: integrating clinical and research aspirations; support - or lack of it; the hidden curriculum; and the legacy effect. Respondents identified facilitators and barriers to engagement in these categories, including unforeseen challenges.

CONCLUSION

Formal support is necessary but is insufficient for fostering engagement and maximising benefits. Participation must be supported by colleagues and enabled by institutional structures. The potential effects of internships on engagement with research is considerable but requires collaboration between all stakeholders.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Deeper institutional engagement is needed so that internship opportunities are fully supported by all colleagues and practically enabled by institutional structures. Future schemes should attempt to promote opportunities to collaborate through group projects to reduce researchers' isolation.

Factors impacting on retention, success and equitable participation in clinical academic careers: a scoping review and meta-thematic synthesis

OBJECTIVES

To examine and synthesise current evidence on the factors that affect recruitment, retention, participation and progression within the clinical academic pathway, focusing on equitable participation across protected characteristics including gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation.

DESIGN

Scoping review and meta-thematic synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

Web of Science, Google Scholar.

ARTICLE SELECTION

We conducted a scoping review of English language articles on factors affecting recruitment, retention, progression and equitable participation in clinical academic careers published in North America, Australasia and Western Europe between January 2005 and April 2019. The most recent and relevant 39 articles were selected for meta-thematic synthesis using detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were purposively sampled to cover protected characteristics and career stages and coded for factors related to equitable participation. 17 articles were fully coded. No new themes arose after nine papers. Themes and higher level categories were derived through an iterative consensual process.

RESULTS

13 discrete themes of factors impacting on equitable participation were identified including societal attitudes and expectations; national and organisational policies, priorities and resourcing; academic and clinical workplace cultures; supportive, discriminatory and compensatory interpersonal behaviours and personal factors related to social capital, finances, competing priorities, confidence and ambition, and orientation to clinical, academic and leadership roles.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad and often interconnected nature of these factors suggests that interventions will need to address structural and cultural factors as well as individual needs. In addition to standard good practice on equality and diversity, we suggest that organisations provide equitable support towards early publication success and targeted mentoring; address financial and role insecurity; address the clinical workplace culture; mitigate clinical-academic-personal role conflicts and overload; ensure that promotional structures and processes encourage diverse applicants and promote family-friendly, coherent and transparent national career pathways.

Reshaping the critical role of surgeons in oncology research

Surgery remains a mainstay in the treatment of most solid cancers. Surgeons have always engaged in various forms of high-quality cancer research to optimize outcomes for their patients, for example, contributing to clinical research and outcomes research as well as health education and public health policy. Over the past decade, however, concerns have been raised about a global decline in the number of surgeons performing basic science research alongside clinical activity - so-called surgeon scientists. Herein, we describe some of the unique obstacles faced by contemporary trainee and practising surgeons engaged in research, as well as providing a perspective on the implications of the diminishing prominence of the surgeon scientist. Finally, we offer some thoughts on potential strategies and future directions for surgical engagement in oncology research to increase the number of research-active surgeons.

Junior clinical academic psychiatrists in Australia: The University of New South Wales initiative

OBJECTIVE

We examined current pathways of training for junior clinical academic psychiatrists in Australia. An initiative of the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, is described from the perspective of two junior clinical academics.

CONCLUSIONS

Australia has limited defined clinical academic pathways for psychiatrists when compared internationally. Numerous challenges for junior psychiatrists entering academia include tensions between clinical and academic roles, reduced remuneration, difficulty building a competitive track record and a scarcity of funding. Potential solutions lie with universities and local health districts partnering to fund clinical academic roles and offering flexible entry points across specialty training. Fostering research engagement in junior psychiatrists will develop the next generation of clinical academics with benefit for clinical and academic domains.

The clinician-scientist track: an approach addressing Australia's need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce

BACKGROUND

Clinician-scientist training represents the epitome of preparation for biomedical scientific discovery. The significance of, and need for, clinician-scientists is universally recognised as essential to progress medical research across what is regarded as the 'translational gap'. Despite a rich history of cutting-edge biomedical research, Australia has no infrastructure or career pathway for training clinician-scientists.

DISCUSSION

The Clinician-scientist Track (CST) was developed to address this concern at the University of Queensland. The CST concept began in 2010 with the Concurrent MD-Masters that allowed students to undertake a research Masters concurrently with their medical program. The rationale was to offer an attractive and realistic option to recruit our highest performing students into a research higher degree, with the underlying aim of encouraging those most capable, to transfer to the MD-PhD. The Concurrent MD-Masters was immediately popular and remains so. Over 8 years, enrolments rose seven-fold (60 MD-Masters, 36 MD-PhDs). The transfer rate from MD-Masters to MD-PhD is 28% supporting our original aim.

CONCLUSIONS

Many challenges remain for the future of the program. These challenges are underpinned by a culture that values clinician-scientists as crucial to ensuring that high quality health and medical research is undertaken and translated to patient care, but lags behind in establishing an infrastructure to develop and maintain a new generation of this vital workforce. A future challenge is to develop a coordinated approach to a supported Australian MD-PhD pathway for our most talented and committed students beginning in the undergraduate Bachelor's degree into the medical degree and throughout specialty training. Shared responsibility is necessary between institutions and stakeholders to support and nurture newly trained MD-PhDs into the post-graduate years. Flexibility across this medical training continuum that allows integration of both degrees will help ensure students make the most meaningful connections between the research and the medicine. What is paramount will be acknowledging the career expectations of an emerging cohort of medical students, in particular females, wishing to pursue research. Without these considerations we risk losing our next generation of potential clinician-scientists.

New graduate doctors' preparedness for practice: a multistakeholder, multicentre narrative study

OBJECTIVE

While previous studies have begun to explore newly graduated junior doctors' preparedness for practice, findings are largely based on simplistic survey data or perceptions of newly graduated junior doctors and their clinical supervisors alone. This study explores, in a deeper manner, multiple stakeholders' conceptualisations of what it means to be prepared for practice and their perceptions about newly graduated junior doctors' preparedness (or unpreparedness) using innovative qualitative methods.

DESIGN

A multistakeholder, multicentre qualitative study including narrative interviews and longitudinal audio diaries.

SETTING

Four UK settings: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight stakeholder groups comprising n=185 participants engaged in 101 narrative interviews (27 group and 84 individual). Twenty-six junior doctors in their first year postgraduation also provided audio diaries over a 3-month period.

RESULTS

We identified 2186 narratives across all participants (506 classified as 'prepared', 663 as 'unprepared', 951 as 'general'). Seven themes were identified; this paper focuses on two themes pertinent to our research questions: (1) explicit conceptualisations of preparedness for practice; and (2) newly graduated junior doctors' preparedness for the General Medical Council's (GMC) outcomes for graduates. Stakeholders' conceptualisations of preparedness for practice included short-term (hitting the ground running) and long-term preparedness, alongside being prepared for practical and emotional aspects. Stakeholders' perceptions of medical graduates' preparedness for practice varied across different GMC outcomes for graduates (eg, Doctor as Scholar and Scientist, as Practitioner, as Professional) and across stakeholders (eg, newly graduated doctors sometimes perceived themselves as prepared but others did not).

CONCLUSION

Our narrative findings highlight the complexities and nuances surrounding new medical graduates' preparedness for practice. We encourage stakeholders to develop a shared understanding (and realistic expectations) of new medical graduates' preparedness. We invite medical school leaders to increase the proportion of time that medical students spend participating meaningfully in multiprofessional teams during workplace learning.

The clinical academic workforce in Australia and New Zealand: report on the second binational summit to implement a sustainable training pathway

There has been a decline in the proportion of clinical academics compared with full-time clinicians, since 2004. A Working Party was established to help develop and implement a model for the training of clinical academics. After a highly successful first summit in 2014 that summarised the challenges faced by clinical academics in Australia and New Zealand, a second summit was convened late in 2015 to report on progress and to identify key areas for further action. The second summit provided survey results that identified the varied training pathways currently offered to clinical academics and the institutions willing to be involved in developing improved pathways. A literature review also described the contributions that clinical academics make to the health sector and the challenges faced by this workforce sector. Current training pathways created for clinical academics by Australasian institutions were presented as examples of what can be done. The perspectives of government and research organisations presented at the summit helped define how key stakeholders can contribute. Following the summit, there was a strong commitment to continue to work towards developing a sustainable and defined training pathway for clinical academics. The need for a coordinated and integrated approach was highlighted. Some key objectives were agreed upon for the next phase, including identifying and engaging key advocates within government and leading institutions; publishing and profiling the contributions of successful clinical academics to healthcare outcomes; defining the stages of a clinical academic training pathway; and establishing a mentoring programme for training clinical academics.

The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities

OBJECTIVES

To examine clinical doctoral students' demographic and training characteristics, career intentions, career preparedness and what influences them as they plan their future careers.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Online cross-sectional census surveys at two research-intensive medical schools in England in 2015-2016.

PARTICIPANTS

All medically qualified PhD students (N=523) enrolled at the University of Oxford and University College London were invited to participate. We report on data from 320 participants (54% male and 44% female), who were representative by gender of the invited population.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Career intentions.

RESULTS

Respondents were mainly in specialty training, including close to training completion (25%, n=80), and 18% (n=57) had completed training. Half (50%, n=159) intended to pursue a clinical academic career (CAC) and 62% (n=198) were at least moderately likely to seek a clinical lectureship (CL). However, 51% (n=163) had little or no knowledge about CL posts. Those wanting a CAC tended to have the most predoctoral medical research experience (χ² (2, N=305)=22.19, p=0.0005). Key reasons cited for not pursuing a CAC were the small number of senior academic appointments available, the difficulty of obtaining research grants and work-life balance.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that urging predoctoral clinicians to gain varied research experience while ensuring availability of opportunities, and introducing more flexible recruitment criteria for CL appointments, would foster CACs. As CL posts are often only open to those still in training, the many postdoctoral clinicians who have completed training, or nearly done so, do not currently gain the opportunity the post offers to develop as independent researchers. Better opportunities should be accompanied by enhanced career support for clinical doctoral students (eg, to increase knowledge of CLs). Finally, ways to increase the number of senior clinical academic appointments should be explored since their lack seems to significantly influence career decisions.