Observational cohort study of outcomes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Analysis of the total serum IgE levels in patients with acute exacerbations chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective study

Currently, few studies have demonstrated the relationship between total serum IgE (T-IgE) and acute exacerbation chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). In this study, T-IgE in AECOPD patients were investigated and jointly analyzed with the clinical characteristics. AECOPD patients hospitalized from July 2018 to July 2019 were included in this study. In this patient cohort, clinical information was investigated. Routine blood tests, C-reactive protein and T-IgE levels of patients were determined along with blood gas analysis. The length of hospital stays, mechanical ventilation during hospitalization, ICU admission, glucocorticoid related clinical information were recorded. A total of 285 AECOPD patients were included in this study, which consisted of a high proportion of males. Of all patients, 49.82% patients exhibited higher T-IgE levels. Based on the reference T-IgE value 60 kU/L, patients were divided into high T-IgE group with T-IgE > 60 kU/L, and low T-IgE group with T-IgE ≤ 60 kU/L. There was no significant difference in the dosage of glucocorticoid between the two groups. Patients in the high T-IgE group had shorter hospital stays and lower probability of mechanical ventilation compared to the low T-IgE group. After adjustment for confounding factors, T-IgE was negatively correlated with the length of hospital stays. AECOPD patients with elevated T-IgE had shorter hospital stays and lower risks of mechanical ventilation and ICU admission. Our results showed that T-IgE might play an important role on evaluating the condition and guiding for treatment decisions in AECOPD patients.

Fast Prediction of Deterioration and Death Risk in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Vital Signs and Admission History: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has 2 courses with different options for medical treatment: the acute exacerbation phase and the stable phase. Stable patients can use the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) to guide treatment strategies. However, GOLD could not classify and guide the treatment of acute exacerbation as acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is a complex process.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to propose a fast severity assessment and risk prediction approach in order to strengthen monitoring and medical interventions in advance.

METHODS

The proposed method uses a classification and regression tree (CART) and had been validated using the AECOPD inpatient's medical history and first measured vital signs at admission that can be collected within minutes. We identified 552 inpatients with AECOPD from February 2011 to June 2018 retrospectively and used the classifier to predict the outcome and prognosis of this hospitalization.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of the proposed CART classifier was 76.2% (83/109 participants) with 95% CI 0.67-0.84. The precision, recall, and F-measure for the mild AECOPD were 76% (50/65 participants), 82% (50/61 participants), and 0.79, respectively, and those with severe AECOPD were 75% (33/44 participants), 68% (33/48 participants), and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This fast prediction CART classifier for early exacerbation detection could trigger the initiation of timely treatment, thereby potentially reducing exacerbation severity and recovery time and improving the patients' health.

Differences between COPD patients and their families regarding willingness toward life-sustaining treatments

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive more life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) than those with other diseases. The aims of this study were to explore the willingness of COPD patients and their families to consent to LSTs and compare the differences between their levels of willingness.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and structured questionnaires were used for data collection.

RESULTS

A total of 219 valid samples were collected, including 109 patients and 110 families. Sixty percent of family members indicated that they did not know the intentions of the patient. Families were significantly more willing for patients to receive LSTs than the patients themselves. The level of willingness of patients and families varied according to the situation and LST interventions. When patients were in a vegetative state or medical treatments were futile, the willingness of COPD patients and their families to receive LSTs significantly decreased. Endotracheal intubation and external defibrillation were the least likely to be requested, whereas the willingness to receive medication injections and noninvasive ventilation was greatest.

CONCLUSION

Communication between families and patients on the issue of LST should be facilitated. Adequate information on the patient's condition and possible LSTs should be provided to avoid COPD patients receiving inappropriate LSTs.