Antimicrobial stewardship opportunities among inpatients with diabetic foot infections: microbiology results from a tertiary hospital multidisciplinary unit

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous cefazolin as an alternative to intravenous administration

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous (SC) administration of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Cefazolin is widely used for skin and soft tissue infections and other complex infections by IV administration.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-over self-controlled study, a single dose of SC cefazolin was administered to 15 stable inpatients established on IV cefazolin as part of their management plan. The equivalent dose of cefazolin was diluted in 50 mL of normal saline via gravity feed over 30 min. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following both the SC and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were evaluated.

RESULTS

SC cefazolin was well tolerated. The bioavailability of SC administration was 74.8% (95% CI 66.7%-81.7%). Slower absorption from SC tissue was associated with a BMI of ≥30. Lower peak, and higher trough concentrations were observed with SC administration. Although lower bioavailability was observed with SC administration, the PTA for unbound drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 90% of the time between doses was higher for SC compared with IV administration at MICs between 0.25 and 4 mg/L. Simulated SC doses of 3 g twice daily had similar PTA to standard IV dosing of 2 g three times daily. A simulated 6 g continuous 24 h infusion of SC cefazolin had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile.

CONCLUSION

SC cefazolin appears to be well tolerated, with an improved pharmacokinetic profile compared with IV administration. Either 3 g twice daily, or 6 g as a 24 h SC infusion could be considered for future evaluation.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous meropenem as an alternative to intravenous administration

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous delivery of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Meropenem is commonly used to treat infections caused by resistant Gram-negative organisms.

METHODS

This was a prospective, crossover self-controlled study in 11 stable inpatients established on meropenem. Participants received a single dose of subcutaneous meropenem, in 50 mL normal saline via gravity feed. Venous blood sampling was performed at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following the subcutaneous and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were assessed.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous meropenem was well tolerated. The bioavailability of subcutaneous administration was 81.5% (95% CI 71.6%-93.2%). Increasing BMI was associated with slower absorption from subcutaneous tissue. Compared with IV, subcutaneous administration resulted in lower peak and higher trough concentrations. Despite the lower bioavailability observed, the PTA for free drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 40% of the time between doses was higher for subcutaneous than IV administration at MIC values between 0.03 and 8 mg/L. Simulated subcutaneous doses of 1.5 g twice daily, or 3 g continuous 24 h infusion had improved PTA relative to standard IV dosing of 1 g three times daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous meropenem appears to be well tolerated and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Either 1.5 g twice daily or 3 g as a 24 h subcutaneous infusion could be considered for future evaluation.

Evaluation of empirical antibiotic use in diabetic foot infections at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam: A retrospective study

Empirical antibiotic prescription guidelines were developed at the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City in 2020, which included recommendations for the use of antibiotics to treat diabetic foot infections (DFIs). This study investigated the treatment outcomes when implementing empirical antibiotic guidelines. This retrospective study included 120 inpatients with DFIs at the Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City. This study had 2 periods (before and after implementation of hospital antibiotic guidelines): Period 1 from July 2019 to June 2020 and Period 2 from July 2021 to June 2022, with 60 random patients in each period. Treatment outcomes were assessed as follows: improvement (defined as the absence of fever and a white blood cell count within the normal range) at 72 hours and 7 days; duration of hospitalization; and clinical status at hospital discharge. After implementing empirical antibiotic guidelines, a greater proportion of improvement in the first 7 days of hospitalization (75.0% vs 56.7%, P = .03), and a shorter median duration of hospitalization (12.5 days vs 15.0 days, P = .02) were observed in patients with DFIs. All the patients showed improvement at the time of hospital discharge. The study findings revealed the encouraging effects of implementing empirical antibiotic prescription guidelines for DFI treatment.

Fear of Missing Organisms (FOMO): the discordance among broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic therapy, microbiologic results, and definitive antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections and lower extremity osteomyelitis

Objective

Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is commonly prescribed for patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infections (DFI) and lower extremity osteomyelitis (OM). The primary objective was to evaluate the concordance between empiric antibiotic therapy, microbiologic results, and definitive antibiotic therapy with a focus on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and resistant gram-negative organisms. The secondary objective was to evaluate the negative predictive values (NPV) of select risk factors for MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms for microbiologic results with these organisms.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Safety-net health system in Ohio.

Patients

Adults hospitalized and receiving antibiotic therapy for DFI or lower extremity OM in 2021.

Results

For 259 unique patients, empiric therapies with activity against MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms were administered to 224 (86.5%) and 217 (83.8%) patients, respectively. Definitive therapies with activity against MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms were administered to 91 (35%) and 74 (28.6%) patients, respectively. Of 234 patients with microbiologic testing, 29 (12.4%) had positive cultures with MRSA and 41 (17.5%) with resistant gram-negative organisms. The NPVs of risk factors for MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms for the absence of these organisms in culture were 91% and 85%, respectively.

Conclusions

For patients hospitalized with DFI and lower extremity OM, our data suggest opportunities for substantial reductions in empiric therapies with activity against MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms. The absence of risk factors for these organisms was reasonably good at predicting negative cultures with these organisms.

Prevalence and Predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa among Hospitalized Patients with Diabetic Foot Infections

Background

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are commonly associated with antibiotic overuse. Empiric DFI treatment often includes coverage for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA), but the frequency of PsA DFIs is poorly understood. The study objectives were to quantify the prevalence of and determine predictors for PsA DFIs.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective cohort included hospitalized patients with DFI from 2013 through 2020 who were age ≥18 years; diabetes mellitus diagnosis; and DFI based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision coding, antibiotic treatment, and DFI culture with organism growth. Osteomyelitis was excluded. Patient characteristics were described and compared; the primary outcome was presence of PsA on DFI culture. Predictors of PsA DFI were identified using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Two hundred ninety-two patients were included. The median age was 61 (interquartile range [IQR], 53–69) years; the majority were men (201 [69%]) and White (163 [56%]). The most commonly isolated organisms were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (35%) and streptococci (32%); 147 (54%) cultures were polymicrobial. Two hundred fifty-seven (88%) patients received empiric antibiotics active against PsA, but only 27 (9%) patients had PsA DFI. Immunocompromised status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.3–16.7]) and previous outpatient DFI antibiotic treatment failure (aOR, 4.8 [95% CI, 1.9–11.9]) were associated with PsA DFI.

Conclusions

PsA DFI is uncommon, but most patients receive empiric antipseudomonal antibiotics. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics are warranted given the frequency of mixed infections, but patient-specific risk factors should be considered before adding antipseudomonal coverage.

Emerging Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome Analysis Using Cutting Edge Technologies

One of the most prevalent complications of diabetes mellitus are diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Diabetic foot ulcers represent a complex condition placing individuals at-risk for major lower extremity amputations and are an independent predictor of patient mortality. DFU heal poorly when standard of care therapy is applied. In fact, wound healing occurs only approximately 30% within 12 weeks and only 45% regardless of time when standard of care is utilized. Similarly, diabetic foot infections occur in half of all DFU and conventional microbiologic cultures can take several days to process before a result is known. DFU represent a significant challenge in this regard because DFU often demonstrate polymicrobial growth, become resistant to preferred antibiotic therapy, and do not inform providers about long-term prognosis. In addition, conventional culture yields may be affected by the timing of antibiotic administration and collection of tissue for analysis. This may lead to suboptimal antibiotic administration or debilitating amputations. The microbiome of DFU is a new frontier to better understand the interactions between host organisms and pathogenic ones. Newer molecular techniques are readily available to assist in analyzing the constituency of the microbiome of DFU. These emerging techniques have already been used to study the microbiome of DFU and have clinical implications that may alter standard of care practice in the near future. Here emerging molecular techniques that can provide clinicians with rapid DFU-related-information and help prognosticate outcomes in this vulnerable patient population are presented.

Correlation of MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) wound swab testing and wound cultures in skin and soft tissue infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a considerable pathogen in the setting of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). MRSA PCR swab testing is widely used in the setting of respiratory tract infections, however little data exists relating to the use of MRSA PCR swab testing in SSTIs. Three thousand, nine hundred and ninety-five patients were included in this retrospective study that aimed to validate the clinical correlation of MRSA PCR wound swab testing in SSTIs through sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) analysis. From this review, MRSA PCR wound swabs were found to have a sensitivity of 97.6% (97.5-98.5), a specificity of 94.9% (94.3-95.7), a PPV of 92.3% (91.4-93.2), and a NPV of 98.4% (98.0-98.8). The study results demonstrate that the MRSA SSTI PCR assays have a high NPV and the potential to be a vital tool in de-escalating antimicrobial therapy associated with SSTIs.