Can an online mental health training program improve physician supervisors' behaviour towards trainees?

Mental health training for physicians supervising resident physicians: a cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an online training program for physician supervisors with the aim of promoting a mentally healthy workplace by improving their use of both responsive and preventive mental health support strategies.

STUDY DESIGN

Cluster randomised, waitlist-controlled trial.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

Royal Australasian College of Physicians fellows who were supervising at least one resident physician in any of the 31 primary health networks in Australia and 20 district health boards in New Zealand (health network clusters).

INTERVENTION

A brief online skills-based mental health training program, comprising twelve modules grouped into three topics: common mental illnesses; helping trainees you are concerned about (responsive strategies); and minimising mental health risks at work (preventive strategies).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change between baseline and the 3-month assessment in self-reported recommended supervisor behaviours; differences between intervention and control groups in recommended behaviour scores three weeks, three months, and six months after the program.

RESULTS

Ninety physicians from 20 health network clusters were allocated to the intervention group, 88 physicians from 22 clusters to the control group. Intervention group participants reported greater positive change in behaviour across the study period than those in the control group (mixed model repeated measures analysis, group × time interaction: P < 0.001). The mean change in self-reported supervisory behaviour score was higher for the intervention than the control group at the 3-week (mean difference in score, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.4), 3-month (0.9; 95% CI, 0.2-1.6), and 6-month assessments (1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7). The mean change in self-reported responsive behaviour score was also greater for the intervention group at the 3-week (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.1), 3-month (1.0; 95% CI, 0.2-1.9), and 6-month assessments (2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9); differences in the mean change in preventive behaviour scores were statistically significant at the 3-week (mean difference, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.1-2.2) and 6-month assessments (1.8; 95% CI, 0.8-2.8), but not the 3-month assessment (0.8; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Brief online mental health training for senior physicians can lead to changes in their self-reported behaviour for supporting the mental health needs of resident physicians. Whether this leads to better mental health for resident physicians should be investigated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619001496101 (prospective).

Effectiveness of a multi-modal hospital-wide doctor mental health and wellness intervention

BACKGROUND

Doctors report high rates of workplace stress and are at increased risk of mental health disorders. However, there are few real-world studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at addressing workplace risk factors and improving doctors' mental health in a hospital setting. This study was conducted over two years (2017-2019) to assess the effects of a multi-modal intervention on working conditions doctors' mental health and help-seeking for mental health problems in two Australian teaching hospitals.

METHODS

The multimodal intervention consisted of organisational changes, such as reducing unrostered overtime, as well as strategies for individual doctors, such as mental health training programs. Hospital-based doctors at all career stages were eligible to participate in two cross-sectional surveys. 279 doctors completed the baseline survey (19.2% response rate) and 344 doctors completed the follow-up survey (31.3% response rate). A range of workplace risk and protective factors, mental health (psychological distress and suicidal ideation) and help-seeking outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in key workplace protective factors, with small effects found for doctors' job satisfaction, stress, work-life balance and perceived workplace support and a significant reduction in workplace risk factors including a moderate reduction in reported bullying behaviour between baseline to follow-up (job satisfaction p < 0.05, all other outcomes p < 0.01). However, no significant changes in doctors' mental health or help-seeking outcomes were found over the intervention period.

CONCLUSION

Following the implementation of individual and organisational-level strategies in two Australian tertiary hospitals, doctors reported a reduction in some key workplace stressors, but no significant changes to their mental health or help-seeking for mental health problems. Further research is warranted, particularly to determine if these workplace changes will lead to improved mental health outcomes for doctors once maintained for a longer period.

'The hardest job I've ever done': a qualitative exploration of the factors affecting junior doctors' mental health and well-being during medical training in Australia

Background

Medical practitioners can experience considerable stress and poor mental health during their careers, with doctors in training known to be particularly vulnerable. Previous research has documented work-related factors that may play a role in the mental health status of junior doctors. However, these and additional factors, need to be explored further by considering theory-driven, social, structural and contextual issues. This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of junior doctors working in Australian hospitals to identify factors that impact their mental health during medical training.

Method

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 junior medical officers (JMOs) employed across six hospitals in Australia. Transcribed de-identified interviews were analysed thematically using a data-driven inductive approach.

Results

Four interrelated main themes were identified: i) professional hierarchies; ii) occupational stress; iii) emotional labour, and iv) taking distress home; which detail the complex affective, relational and professional experiences of JMOs. The accounts demonstrate how the social, professional and organisational dimensions of these experiences impact upon trainee’s well-being and mental health, both positively and negatively. Together, the findings document the dynamic, nuanced aspects of junior doctors’ experiences of medical training and practice and highlights the importance of relational connections and the workplace environment in shaping JMOs’ social and emotional well-being.

Conclusion

The current study adds to the understanding of how junior doctors navigate medical training in Australian hospitals and highlights the complexities of this experience, particularly the ways in which mental health and well-being are shaped by different elements. These findings have important implications to inform new strategies to improve JMO mental health and to leverage work and non-work contexts to better support JMOs during medical training.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07381-5.