Lymphedema rehabilitation: Provision and practice patterns among service providers: National survey

Knowledge, attitude and practice of physiotherapists about lymphedema: A Turkish perspective

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapists are important members of the healthcare team in the management of lymphedema. Therefore, the level of knowledge and awareness of physiotherapists on this disease is substantial. This study was planned to investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice of physiotherapists about lymphedema in Turkey.

METHOD

This study was a qualitative, prospective, and cross-sectional research. Data were collected with the web-survey which consisted of the demographical characteristics information, evaluation of their own knowledge and practice in lymphedema management, and current knowledge of physiotherapists about lymphedema based on the current literature.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-four physiotherapists (174 Female: 100 Male; mean age: 29.87 ± 6.9 years) completed the web-survey. From 274 physiotherapists, 52.60% of them had no education about lymphedema, 13.90% of them had never seen any patient with lymphedema, and 57.70% of them had not taken part in the management of a patient with lymphedema. 71.90% of the physiotherapists did not think they have enough knowledge about lymphedema. It was identified that physiotherapists' general and risk factors knowledge about lymphedema was sufficient. However, physiotherapists showed a lack of knowledge on the evaluation, treatment, and recommendations for lymphedema.

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapists' education and experience in lymphedema management are crucial as they are important members of the multidisciplinary team. To raise qualified physiotherapists in this field, from undergraduate education, special training programs about lymphedema should be added to their lifelong learning process.

Integrating molecular biomarkers in breast cancer rehabilitation. What is the current evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Background: Quality of life issues is a crucial burden in breast cancer (BC) survivors with relevant implications in terms of survivorship and health-care costs. The increasing long-term survival of these patients provides new challenges, with translational research now focusing on innovative and tailored approaches to improve their complex management. In this scenario, several emerging biomarkers have the potential to improve the clinical rehabilitative management of patients with BC. However, to date, guidelines supporting biomarker implementation in this area are still lacking. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize the currently available biomarkers that might be potentially integrated into rehabilitation practice to promote a precision medicine approach to BC survivorship issues.

Methods: On 9th March 2022, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and PEDro were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing rehabilitation interventions in BC patients. Molecular biomarker modifications induced by physical exercise have been assessed through the review of the study protocols and published results. The Jadad scale was used to assess the quality of the studies included.

Results: Out of 2,224 records, 22 studies were included in the present systematic review. Exercise therapy showed significant results in 15 RCTs, in terms of metabolic biomarkers, including glycemic and insulin profile, and lipid profile (p ≤ 0.05). Similarly, 12 studies underlined significant effects in inflammation and immune response biomarkers, including TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, C-reactive protein, leptin, and adiponectin (p ≤ 0.05). On the other hand, cardiac biomarkers were assessed in three studies without reporting significant differences after exercise therapy (p = NS). The quality assessment identified 19 RCTs as high-quality studies and three RCTs of low quality.

Conclusion: Our findings reveal significant biochemical perturbations in key molecules induced by physical exercise in patients with BC, suggesting room for the implementation of actionable biomarkers. Future research might clarify the role of biomarkers on treatment effectiveness monitoring, to optimize rehabilitative strategies tailored to patient’s needs.

Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge of Lymphedema

Objectives

Lymphedema is neglected in medical education, and a review on healthcare practitioners' (HCPs) knowledge is necessary to shed light on gaps and to provide evidence for establishing educational programs on lymphedema.

Methods

This systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA guideline in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. There was no limitation on the type of lymphedema or HCPs. The quality assessment was performed based on QATSDD. Data regarding study characteristics, questionnaire context, and findings of the study were summarized from each article.

Results

After the screening, 16 articles were included that 12 were cross-sectional, two were qualitative, and two were interventional pilot studies. Breast cancer and other cancer-related lymphedema, lymphatic filariasis, and podoconiosis were included, and the majority of articles were focused on primary HCPs. The overall knowledge was low and average in five and 11 articles, respectively, and prior education was a significant factor related to higher knowledge of lymphedema in two studies.

Conclusion

Structured education of lymphedema is needed to increase the knowledge of HCPs and to enhance their collaboration in multidisciplinary care teams. Improvement of HCPs' knowledge may lead to better outcomes of lymphedema patients' management which are neglected.