Azithromycin monthly pulse vs daily doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Efficacy of Azithromycin in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Mini Review

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Considering the rise of antibiotic resistance, alternative medications may be used in the main anti-acne armamentarium. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of oral azithromycin in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

METHODS

Database searches were performed in PubMed and Scopus using the keywords “azithromycin” and “acne”.

RESULTS

Azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days per week or in cycles of 10 days for 12 weeks are the most commonly used regimens.

CONCLUSION

Available experimental data suggest that oral azithromycin is an effective and well-tolerated option for treatment of acne vulgaris.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Acne Vulgaris: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Acne vulgaris is one of the most common disorders of the pilosebaceous unit. Although doxycycline is considered to be a first-line anti-acne antibiotic, various other antibiotics have been tried due to its adverse effects and contraindications. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of oral azithromycin pulse therapy with that of oral daily doxycycline in the management of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.

Methods

Five scientific databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) were searched to identify relevant studies. A review of 1,341 publications produced six RCTs that met our predefined inclusion criteria. The clinical outcome measures were remaining acne lesion counts, patients' self-assessment of treatment, and the investigators' assessment of treatment after 12 weeks.

Results

We included six studies assessing 906 patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Meta-analyses of clinical outcome measures revealed no significant difference between the two groups regarding remaining acne lesion counts (p=0.27), patients' self-assessment of treatment (p=0.67), and the investigators' assessment of treatment (p=0.32). The incidence of severe adverse events leading to the discontinuation of therapy was higher in the doxycycline daily therapy group when compared with the azithromycin pulse therapy group.

Conclusion

This study indicates that azithromycin pulse therapy is equivalent to doxycycline at 12 weeks in the efficacy of the treatment for moderate to severe acne vulgaris Therefore, oral azithromycin pulse therapy may be a good alternative to doxycycline in the management of acne for those unable to tolerate doxycycline.

A review of diagnosis and treatment of acne in adult female patients

This review focuses on the treatment options for adult female patients with acne. Acne in adult female patients may start during adolescence and persist or have an onset in adulthood. Acne has various psychosocial effects that impact patients’ quality of life. Treatment of acne in adult women specifically has its challenges due to the considerations of patient preferences, pregnancy, and lactation. Treatments vary widely and treatment should be tailored specifically for each individual woman. We review conventional therapies with high levels of evidence, additional treatments with support from cohort studies and case reports, complementary and/or alternative therapies, and new agents under development for the treatment of patients with acne.

Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris

Acne is one of the most common disorders treated by dermatologists and other health care providers. While it most often affects adolescents, it is not uncommon in adults and can also be seen in children. This evidence-based guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in its management. Issues from grading of acne to the topical and systemic management of the disease are reviewed. Suggestions on use are provided based on available evidence.

Treatment of acne in children

Acne is a common skin condition in adolescents. It is not uncommon in childhood and it persists into adulthood. A broad range of acne treatments are available and have been shown to be safe and effective in adolescents and adults. However, there is limited literature regarding acne treatment in childhood and its available therapeutic options. It seems reasonable to extrapolate findings of the various studies reported on treatment of acne in the adolescent and adult age group, with the exclusion of the use of tetracycline derivatives. As clinicians, we must be more familiar with the clinical presentation of acne and available treatment options in our younger patients. Early recognition of acne with prompt and appropriate initiation of therapy in childhood will help prevent severe scarring in children.

New antibiotic therapies for acne and rosacea

Acne and rosacea compromise a substantial portion of the dermatology clinical practice. Over the past century, many treatment modalities have been introduced with antibiotics playing a major role. Today, both oral and topical antibiotics are used in the management of acne and rosacea, with several novel formulations and/or combination regimens recently introduced. The latest studies suggest anti-inflammatory actions to be the most likely mechanism of antibiotics in acne and rosacea, shifting the focus to subantimicrobial-dose oral antibiotics and/or topical antibiotic regimens as the preferred first-line agents. Here we will discuss the most recent oral and topical antibiotic therapies available for treatment of acne and rosacea, with special focus on efficacy data, indication, dosing, and mechanism of action.

Approach to pediatric acne treatment: an update

By late adolescence, almost all individuals have experienced some degree of acne. A broad range of acne treatments has been shown to be safe and effective in adults. While still sparse, emerging data now also document similar safety and efficacy of these agents for children >12 years of age. For younger children with preadolescent acne, where data are more limited or unavailable, it seems reasonable to extrapolate from the findings of studies involving older children >12 years of age. This article reviews the latest evidence and current expert opinions on acne therapies in the pediatric age group.

Acne vulgaris treatment : the current scenario

Acne Vulgaris is one of the most common skin disorders which dermatologists have to treat. It mainly affect adolescent, though may present at any age. In recent years, due to better understanding of the pathogenesis of acne, new therapeutic modalities and various permutation and combinations have been designed. In topical agents; benzoyl peroxide, antibiotics, retinoids, etc are the mainstay of treatment; can be given in combinations. While systemic therapy includes oral antibiotics, hormonal therapy, and isotretinoin, depending upon the need of patients it has to be selected. Physical treatment in the form of lesion removal, photo-therapy is also helpful in few of them. Since various old and new topical and systemic agents are available to treat acne, it sometime confuse treating dermatologist. To overcome this, panel of physicians and researchers worked together as a global alliance and task force to improve outcomes in acne treatment. They have tried to give consensus recommendation for the treatment of acne. Successful management of acne needs careful selection of anti-acne agents according to clinical presentation and individual patient needs.

Comparison of therapeutic effects of oral doxycycline and azithromycin in patients with moderate acne vulgaris: What is the role of age?

BACKGROUND

Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder in adolescence and young adults. In past decades, systemic antibiotics have had the main role in the treatment of acne patients with inflammatory papules and cysts. They are sometimes associated with side effects, contributing to reduced compliance.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin and doxycycline in the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris, considering the age of patients as an influencing parameter.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, 100 patients with moderate acne vulgaris who attended the outpatient dermatology clinic were evaluated during a 15-month period. They were randomized into two equal groups: A and D. Patients in group A received oral azithromycin (500 mg daily, 4 consecutive days per month for 3 consecutive months) and patients in group D took doxycycline (100 mg daily for 3 consecutive months). The number and types of lesions (all over the body) were determined at baseline and at the end of each month for 90 days afterwards. Michaelson's acne severity score was also determined at baseline and at the end of the third month after initiating treatment. Patients were followed up for another 3 months after discontinuation of treatment to determine the recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Both antibiotics were comparably effective in the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris. There was no significant side effect in the A group and the complications were minor in the D group. Doxycycline was significantly more effective in patients older than 18 years.

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin is at least as effective as doxycycline in the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris; however, in patients older than 18 years doxycycline is better.

Pharmacotherapy of acne

BACKGROUND

Acne results from the interplay of several pathophysiologic factors, in particular seborrhoea, follicular hyperkeratosis, propionibacteria and inflammation. Recently, it has become clear that inflammatory events are important not only in the course, but also in the initiation of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

The study undertook an evaluation of the effectiveness of currently available pharmacotherapeutic treatment options for acne.

METHODS

After a Medline-based literature search, this article critically reviewed substances used topically (among others, retinoids, antimicrobials, salicylic acid and azelaic acid) and systemically (antibiotics, isotretinoin, hormones and zinc) as well as their combinations with respect to pharmacology, clinical efficacy and side effects.

RESULTS

Modern acne pharmacotherapy provides substances that antagonize one or more of the major pathophysiologic factors of acne. When the clinical picture but also patients' motivation and wishes are appropriately considered, current pharmacotherapy of acne is rational and effective.

Efficacy of tetracyclines in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a review

BACKGROUND

Oral tetracyclines are routinely used for the management of inflammatory acne. However, there is a lack of evidence-based data on their relative effectiveness and appropriate dosages.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative effectiveness and the optimal dosage of tetracyclines for the treatment of inflammatory acne.

METHODS

We designed a systematic review of the clinical trials (1962-2006) investigating oral tetracyclines for the treatment of inflammatory acne. We obtained data from MEDLINE, PubMed, Current Contents, reference lists and specialist textbooks.

RESULTS

There was substantial heterogeneity in the design of the trials. We identified only seven randomized trials which were set up to compare the efficacy of tetracyclines in reducing acne lesion counts. These showed no evidence of superiority of one tetracycline over another. Overall, there was also no significant difference between the available tetracyclines in terms of improvement in inflammatory (32 trials, P=0.898) and noninflammatory (23 trials, P=0.429) lesions. In the range of investigated dosages, the antibiotic dosage had no impact on efficacy in inflammatory (P=0.609) and noninflammatory (P=0.654) lesions. There was no decrease in efficacy during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support one tetracycline rather than another in terms of efficacy. In the range of investigated dosages, the antibiotic dosage seems to have no impact on efficacy. Despite increased resistance to antibiotics, oral tetracycline formulations displayed no change in efficacy during the study period. Further studies are, however, required to determine if the anti-inflammatory properties of tetracyclines are sufficient in managing acne.

Guidelines of care for acne vulgaris management

DISCLAIMER

Adherence to these guidelines will not ensure successful treatment in every situation. Furthermore, these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific therapy must be made by the physician and the patient in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient.

Systemic antibiotic therapy of acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory, medium to severe acne vulgaris is treated with systemic antibiotics worldwide. The rationale is an effect on Propionibacterium acnes as well as the intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties of these antibiotics. Although there are no correlations between the number of P. acnes and the severity of the disease, associations between the degree of humoral and cellular immune responses towards P. acnes and the severity of acne have been reported. Exact data on practical use of these compounds, such as differential efficacy or side effects are unavailable. A summary of currently available studies is presented.

METHODS

The data of studies of systemic antibiotic therapy of acne vulgaris up to 1975, the summary of literature in English up to 1999, a systematic review of minocycline from 2002 as well as the data of randomized controlled studies published and listed in Medline thereafter were reviewed.

RESULTS

Tetracyclines [tetracycline 1,000 mg daily, doxycycline 100 (-200) mg daily, minocycline 100 (-200) mg daily, lymecycline 300 (-600) mg] and erythromycin 1 000 mg daily are significantly more effective than placebo in the systemic treatment of inflammatory acne. The data for tetracycline are best founded. Clindamycin is similarly effective. Co-trimoxazole and trimethoprim are likely to be effective. Clear differences between the tetracyclines or between tetracycline and erythromycin cannot be ascertained. The data for the combination with topical treatments [topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) or retinoids] suggest synergistic effects. Therefore systemic antibiotics should not be used as monotherapy. In case of similar efficacy, other criteria, such as pharmacokinetics (doxycycline, minocycline, lymecycline have longer half-lives than tetracyclines), the rate of side-effects (tetracycline: side effect-rate approximately 4 % mild side effects; erythromycin: frequent gastrointestinal complaints; minocycline: rare, but potentially severe hypersensitivity reactions; doxycycline: dose-dependent phototoxic reactions), the resistance rate [percentage of resistant bacteria higher with erythromycin (approximately 50 %) than with tetracycline-therapy (approximately 20 %)], and the costs of therapy have to be taken into account.

CONCLUSIONS

The systemic antibiotic therapy of widespread papulo-pustular acne not amenable to a topical therapy is effective and well-tolerated. In general therapy can be carried out for 3 months and should be combined with BPO to prevent resistance.

Comparison of efficacy of azithromycin vs. doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory disorder of the skin. Oral antibiotics are known to be effective in its treatment. A randomized, investigator-blinded study was performed to compare the efficacy of azithromycin with doxycycline. Fifty-one patients were randomized to receive either azithromycin 500 mg/day on 3 consecutive days per week in the first, on 2 consecutive days per week in the second, and on 1 day per week in the third month. The other group was given doxycycline twice a day for the first month and once a day for the second and third months. Clinical assessment was made at baseline, at the end of first, second, third, and post-treatment first and second months. Side effects were recorded. Statistically significant improvement for the facial lesions were obtained with both drugs. Neither drug was shown to be more effective than the other. The beneficial effect continued until 2 months after treatment. In the azithromycin group three patients had diarrohea, while photosensitivity was seen in two patients using doxycycline. This study indicates that azithromycin is at least as effective as doxycycline in the treatment of acne.