Specific growth inhibition of small-cell lung cancer cells by adenovirus vector expressing antisense c-kit transcripts

Molecular classification of small cell lung cancer subtypes: Characteristics, prognostic factors, and clinical translation

ABSTRACT

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly malignant tumor with a very poor prognosis; therefore, more effective treatments are urgently needed for patients afflicted with the disease. In recent years, emerging molecular classifications based on key transcription factors of SCLC have provided more information on the tumor pathophysiology, metastasis, immune microenvironment, and acquired therapeutic resistance and reflected the intertumoral heterogeneity of the various SCLC phenotypes. Additionally, advances in genomics and single-cell sequencing analysis have further revealed the high intratumoral heterogeneity and plasticity of the disease. Herein, we review and summarize these recent lines of evidence and discuss the possible pathogenesis of SCLC.

[Advances on Driver Mutations of Small Cell Lung Cancer]

小细胞肺癌是一类具有高度侵袭性的肺恶性肿瘤，预后极差，近30年来，其治疗策略无明显进展。积极研究小细胞肺癌分子生物学特征，并筛选潜在驱动基因，有助于为小细胞肺癌开拓新的治疗途径，改善疾病预后。本文将对小细胞肺癌驱动基因研究相关进展进行综述。

Irinotecan, Carboplatin, and Imatinib in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

INTRODUCTION

The tyrosine kinase KIT has variable expression in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and may be a prognostic factor. Imatinib targets KIT expression, providing rationale for studying its role in combination with chemotherapy in SCLC in a multicenter phase II trial.

METHODS

Patients with untreated extensive-stage SCLC received carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 4 on day 1; irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15; and imatinib 600 mg/day. Treatment cycles were 28 days. Patients remained on imatinib until progressive disease or significant toxicity.

RESULTS

Between September 2002 and May 2004, 68 patients were enrolled in this multicenter trial. Median age was 60 years (range, 37-81). The objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval: 54%-76%). Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.0 months). Median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.5 months). Thirty-five percent of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (43%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included diarrhea (19%), fatigue (24%), and nausea (26%). Forty-eight of 56 patients (86%) with available tumor specimens had KIT expression detected. KIT expression did not appear to correlate with progression-free survival or overall survival in a retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan, carboplatin, and imatinib is a safe and generally well-tolerated regimen in patients with SCLC. However, the addition of imatinib did not improve results from those expected with chemotherapy alone.

Prognostic value of KIT expression in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive disease, with poor survival rates despite standard treatment with combination chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Further insights into the molecular biology of this malignant tumour are needed to improve the therapeutic approaches and outcome. KIT protein is expressed in SCLC, and its kinase activity has been implicated in the pathophysiology of many tumours, including SCLC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of KIT expression in patients with SCLC and its prognostic value.

METHODS

We performed an inmunohistochemical analysis of 204 SCLC samples to determine KIT protein expression. The relationship between KIT expression and clinicopathological parameters was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define its prognostic significance.

RESULTS

KIT expression was observed in 149 of 204 tumour tissues (73%). KIT expression was associated with advanced disease and with decreased incidence of bone metastases. No significant differences were observed for time to disease progression (TTP) (9.1% versus 6.2% at 3 years, p=0.6) or overall survival (OS) (10.7% versus 6.9% at 3 years, p=0.37) among patients with KIT positive versus negative tumours, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that sex, tumour stage, albumin levels and response to therapy were the only independent predictors for survival.

CONCLUSION

KIT protein is expressed in a high percentage of SCLC tumours. In our study population, however, the expression of KIT had no significant impact on survival.

Adenovirus-mediated transfer of human papillomavirus 16 E6/E7 antisense RNA and induction of apoptosis in cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

In most cervical cancers, human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are identified. The E6 and E7 genes of HPVs encode proteins, that interfere with the function of the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and Rb. We are exploring the potential use of antisense HPV RNA transcripts for gene therapy for HPV-positive cervical cancers.

METHODS

Via a recombinant adenoviral vector, Ad5CMV-HPV 16 AS, we introduced the antisense RNA transcripts of the E6 and E7 genes of HPV type 16 into human cervical cancer SiHa cells harboring HPV 16. We then analyzed the effects of expression of these genes on cell and tumor growth.

RESULTS

HPV 16 E6/E7 antisense RNA was detected for 14 days in Ad5CMV-HPV 16 AS-infected cells. After infection, E6 and E7 protein expression was suppressed, and p53 and Rb protein expression increased. The Ad5CMV-HPV 16 AS-infected cells underwent apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Cell growth and tumorigenicity were greatly suppressed. Ad5CMV-HPV 16 AS treatment significantly reduced the volumes of established subcutaneous tumors.

CONCLUSION

Transfection of cervical cancer cells with HPV 16 E6/E7 antisense RNA in a form such as Ad5CMV-HPV 16 AS might be a potentially useful approach to the therapy of HPV 16-positive cervical cancer.

Coexpression of Fragile Histidine Triad and c-kit Is Relevant for Prediction of Survival in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

In a retrospective analysis of 195 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), we examined the prognostic value of a coexpression of fragile histidine triad (FHIT) protein and c-kit on patient's survival.

METHODS

As assessed by immunohistochemistry using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, tumors of 195 patients with SCLC were evaluated for FHIT and c-kit coexpression.

RESULTS

Coexpression of FHIT and c-kit was observed in 53.3%; a positive expression of either FHIT or c-kit was found in 40.5%. Complete lack of FHIT and c-kit (6.2%) was associated with a significantly shorter survival time for the patients with a mean of 122 +/- 45 days compared with 468 +/- 89 days for patients with lung cancer coexpressing FHIT and c-kit (P = 0.0011). The proportion of FHIT- and c-kit-positive cells within a tumor was also related to survival time. Patients with tumors with a proportion between 0% to 25% of FHIT- and c-kit-positive cells had the worst survival of 157 +/- 34 days compared with 496 +/- 95 days for patients showing >25% FHIT- and c-kit-positive cells (P = 0.0002). Further, variables associated with shorter survival times were low performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, and advanced tumor stage according to tumor-node-metastasis classification. Multivariate analysis using Cox regression model, including 11 variables, confirmed the prognostic significance of a combined expression of FHIT and c-kit next to tumor stage, performance status, and lactate dehydrogenase level.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential FHIT and c-kit expression was of prognostic relevance for survival in patients with SCLC and therefore provide useful variables for therapeutic decisions.

KIT (CD117): a review on expression in normal and neoplastic tissues, and mutations and their clinicopathologic correlation

CD117 (KIT) is a type III receptor tyrosine kinase operating in cell signal transduction in several cell types. Normally KIT is activated (phosphorylated) by binding of its ligand, the stem cell factor. This leads to a phosphorylation cascade ultimately activating various transcription factors in different cell types. Such activation regulates apoptosis, cell differentiation, proliferation, chemotaxis, and cell adhesion. KIT-dependent cell types include mast cells, some hematopoietic stem cells, germ cells, melanocytes, and Cajal cells of the gastrointestinal tract, and neoplasms of these cells are examples of KIT-positive tumors. Other KIT-positive normal cells include epithelial cells in skin adnexa, breast, and subsets of cerebellar neurons. KIT positivity has been variably reported in sarcomas such as angiosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and MFH; results of the last three are controversial. The variations in published data may result from incomplete specificity of some polyclonal antibodies, possibly contributed by too high dilutions. Also, KIT is expressed in pulmonary and other small cell carcinomas, adenoid cystic carcinoma, renal chromophobe carcinoma, thymic, and some ovarian and few breast carcinomas. A good KIT antibody reacts with known KIT positive cells, and smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts are negative. KIT deficiency due to hereditary nonsense/missense mutations leads to disruption of KIT-dependent functions such as erythropoiesis, skin pigmentation, fertility, and gastrointestinal motility. Conversely, pathologic activation of KIT through gain-of-function mutations leads to neoplasia of KIT-dependent and KIT-positive cell types at least in three different systems: mast cells/myeloid cells--mastocytosis/acute myeloid leukemia, germ cells--seminoma, and Cajal cells--gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib mesylate are the generally accepted treatment of metastatic GISTs, and their availability has prompted an active search for other treatment targets among KIT-positive tumors such as myeloid leukemias and small cell carcinoma of the lung, with variable and often nonconvincing results.

In vivo efficacy of STI571 in xenografted human small cell lung cancer alone or combined with chemotherapy

STI571, or imatinib, selectively inhibits BCR/ABL, PDGFR and c-kit kinase activity. It has been reported that a large proportion of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines and tumors express c-kit and that STI571 inhibits tumor cell growth. We therefore investigated the therapeutic efficacy of STI571, alone or combined with chemotherapy, in human SCLC cells or tumors xenografted into nude mice. The level of c-kit mRNA expression was variable in SCLC tumors (positive for 2 of 4 xenografts), and c-kit protein was not detected by immunohistochemistry. On the 4 xenografted tumors, PDGFRalpha and PDGFRbeta were not detected by immunohistochemistry. STI571 induced inhibition of proliferation of the SCLC6 cell line without inducing apoptosis; in contrast, in combination with etoposide or topotecan, the growth inhibition of SCLC6 cells induced by STI571 was increased, with apoptotic DNA fragmentation. Four human SCLC xenografts (SCLC6, SCLC61, SCLC74 and SCLC108) were transplanted into mice. After intraperitoneal injection of STI571, we observed 80%, 40% and 78% growth inhibition of SCLC6, SCLC61 and SCLC108 tumors, respectively, without any significant inhibition of SCLC74 tumor growth. In mice bearing responsive SCLC tumors, we observed an increase of growth inhibition induced by chemotherapy (etoposide + ifosfamide or topotecan) by concomitant and continuous administration of STI571, associated with an increase of toxic deaths. In SCLC6-bearing mice receiving sequential treatments, we observed a reduction of toxic deaths but a decrease of synergistic antitumor efficacy. In conclusion, the efficacy of STI571 alone in SCLC xenografted tumors was variable and did not depend on c-kit expression. Moreover, a significant increase of chemotherapy-induced growth inhibition was obtained by concomitant administration of STI571 that should be carefully investigated in SCLC patients.

Oncogenes as Novel Targets for Cancer Therapy (Part I)

In the past 10 years, progress made in cancer biology, genetics, and biotechnology has led to a major transition in cancer drug design and development. There has been a change from an emphasis on non-specific, cytotoxic agents to specific, molecular-based therapeutics. Mechanism-based therapy is designed to act on cellular and molecular targets that are causally involved in the formation, growth, and progression of human cancers. These agents, which may have greater selectivity for cancer versus normal cells, and which may produce better anti-tumor efficacy and lower host toxicity, can be small molecules, natural or engineered peptides, proteins, antibodies, or synthetic nucleic acids (e.g. antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, and siRNAs). Novel targets are identified and validated by state-of-the-art approaches, including high-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry, and gene expression arrays, which increase the speed and efficiency of drug discovery and development. Examples of oncogene-based, molecular therapeutics that show promising clinical activity include trastuzumab (Herceptin), imatinib (Gleevec), and gefitinib (Iressa). However, the full potential of oncogenes as novel targets for cancer therapy has not been realized and many challenges remain, from the validation of novel targets, to the design of specific agents, to the evaluation of these agents in both preclinical and clinical settings. In maximizing the benefits of molecular therapeutics in monotherapy or combination therapy of cancer, it is necessary to have an understanding of the underlying molecular abnormalities and mechanisms involved. This is the first part of a four-part review in which we discuss progress made in the last decade as it relates to the discovery of novel oncogenes and signal transduction pathways, in the context of their potential as targets for cancer therapy. This part delineates the latest discoveries about the potential use of growth factors and protein tyrosine kinases as targets for therapy. Later parts focus on intermediate signaling pathways, transcription factors, and proteins involved in cell cycle, DNA damage, and apoptotic pathways.

Expression of the tyrosine kinase c-kit is an independent prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer

In a retrospective analysis of 203 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), we examined the prognostic value of c-kit expression on survival. Expression of c-kit was examined immunohistochemically in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. c-kit was observed in 87.7% of SCLC tumors. Using the Kaplan-Meier model, we found that lack of c-kit expression was associated with significantly shorter survival time compared to the presence of c-kit expression (mean survival 151 +/- 27 vs. 358 +/- 49 days, p = 0.0084). Moreover, the proportion of c-kit(+) cells within the tumor was also related to survival time. Patients with tumors in which >75% of cells stained positive for c-kit had a mean overall survival time of 424 (+/-72) compared to 295 (+/-67) days for patients with 25-75% c-kit(+) tumor cells. Patients with tumors containing <25% c-kit(+) cells had the worst survival, with 164 (+/-24) days (p = 0.0033). Further parameters associated with short survival times were low performance status, elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase and higher stage according to the TNM classification. Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model showed that the proportion of c-kit(+) cells within the tumor specimen was one of 3 independent prognostic parameters (p = 0.004) for overall survival next to TNM classification (p = 0.001) and performance status (p < 0.001).

Small cell lung cancer: from molecular biology to novel therapeutics

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor which metastasizes early. Patients with this disease have a poor prognosis even with immediate treatment. Because of the aggressive nature of this disease, all aspects of this tumor are studied extensively. This review will provide an update of the biology of SCLC at both the molecular and cellular levels. Cellular pathways and their relationship to cellular function will also be discussed. Treatment of both primary limited- and extensive-stage diseases as well as recurrent disease will be discussed including chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy, and surgery. The role of novel therapeutics being investigated will also be addressed.

Molecular and cellular biology of small cell lung cancer

For any tumor to become cancerous, various genetic mutations and biologic alterations must occur in the cell that in combination render it a malignant neoplasm. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a neoplasm associated with several molecular and cellular abnormalities. SCLC is associated with early and frequent metastasis as well as a poor ultimate response to chemotherapy. New and novel therapies based on understanding the mechanisms of transformation are needed. SCLC is associated with multiple chromosomal abnormalities, the most common of which is chromosome 3p deletion, as well as with abnormal oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. Along with the genetic alterations, SCLC has been shown to overexpress various cell surface receptors, including receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein-coupled receptors, integrins, and others. Some downstream molecules are also activated, such as phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase, and would serve as good candidates for therapeutic strategies.

Antisense therapy for malignant mesothelioma with oligonucleotides targeting the bcl-xl gene product

OBJECTIVE

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is resistant to conventional therapies and to apoptosis. The bcl-2 family genes are major determinants of apoptotic homeostasis. Malignant pleural mesothelioma lines and tumors rarely express the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein but routinely express the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xl and the proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bak. We have previously shown pharmacologic inhibition of bcl-xl expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma can lead to apoptosis, so we sought to determine whether antisense oligonucleotides directed at bcl-xl messenger RNA would engender apoptosis, possibly through a "forced imbalance" of bcl-2 family proteins.

METHODS

Malignant pleural mesothelioma lines REN (epithelial) and I-45 (sarcomatous) were exposed to modified bcl-xl antissense oligonecleotides directed near the messenger RNA initiation sequence with and without a liposomal delivery system. Untreated cells and bcl-xl sense oligonucleotides were controls. Cell viability was measured by colorimetric assay, and apoptosis was evaluated with Hoechst staining and sub-G(1) fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis.

RESULTS

Bcl-xl protein expression after antisense oligonucleotides was downwardly regulated in both cell lines relative to sense oligonucleotides (>65%). Significant cellular killing in both the I-45 and REN cell lines was achieved with antisense oligonucleotides (compared with sense oligonucleotides) without (P =.003 and.006, respectively) and with (P =.006 and.0005, respectively) liposomal delivery. Hoechst staining and sub-G(1) fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis demonstrated apoptosis to be the mechanism of cellular death. Use of a liposomal delivery system increased therapeutic effect and allowed lower doses of antisense oligonucleotides.

CONCLUSION

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at the bcl-xl gene product engender apoptosis in mesothelioma cell lines. The therapeutic potential of inhibiting expression of this protein in mesothelioma should be evaluated.

Therapeutic advances in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterised by neuroendocrine differentiation, early metastatic potential and initial responsiveness to cytotoxic therapy. Unfortunately, despite recent therapeutic advances, most patients relapse and the overall five-year survival rate is only 5%. Standard treatment of SCLC consists of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, with thoracic irradiation added for patients with limited-stage disease. Several newer chemotherapeutic drugs have recently been shown to have significant activity in patients with untreated or relapsed SCLC. These agents include: the topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan; the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel; the pyrimidine analogue, gemcitabine; and the vinca alkaloid, vinorelbine. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular events involved in the pathogenesis and progression of SCLC have led to the identification of a variety of potential targets for novel therapeutic interventions. Strategies aimed at inhibiting the myriad of growth factor pathways that control the proliferation of SCLC cells, include: broad spectrum neuropeptide antagonists (e.g., substance P analogues); growth factor/receptor-specific inhibitors (e.g., anti-GRP monoclonal antibodies, bradykinin antagonist dimers); and a variety of selective protein kinase inhibitors. The importance of cell death pathways in carcinogenesis and treatment-resistance has led to several novel strategies targeting apoptotic mediators, such as bcl-2, that are frequently dysregulated in SCLC (e.g., bcl-2 antisense). Our current challenges are to further refine these promising therapeutic strategies, efficiently evaluate their activity in the clinical setting and integrate them into more effective treatment regimens to improve the overall prognosis of patients with SCLC.