The evolution to stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer

A pilot study on faecal MMP-9: a new noninvasive diagnostic marker of colorectal cancer

Background:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading malignancies worldwide, therefore cheap noninvasive screening methods are of great importance. Matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) has a role in the progression of CRC, and its level is elevated in tumour biopsies. Faecal MMP-9 levels are increased in active ulcerative colitis patients, but in CRC patients, they have never been measured. We aimed to assess the faecal MMP-9 levels in patients undergoing total colonoscopy according to endoscopic and histological diagnosis.

Methods:

One hundred and nine patients provided faecal samples for MMP-9 analysis. A total colonoscopy was performed; suspicious lesions were evaluated by histology. Faecal MMP-9 levels were measured by ELISA.

Results:

The number of patients allocated to different groups were: negative/diverticulosis: 34 (referred to as controls); hyperplastic polyps: 15; adenomas: 32 (22 at high risk); and CRC: 28. Faecal MMP-9 was significantly increased in CRC compared with all other groups (P<0.001). Faecal MMP-9 was suitable to distinguish CRC patients from controls (sensitivity: 89.3% specificity: 91.2%). By means of a lower cutoff level, faecal MMP-9 identified high-risk adenomas besides CRC (sensitivity: 76% specificity: 85.3%). This lower cutoff level screened 59% of high-risk adenomas.

Conclusions:

Faecal MMP-9 may be a promising new noninvasive marker in CRC.

Accuracy of early detection of colorectal tumours by stool methylation markers: A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of methylation of genes in stool samples for diagnosing colorectal tumours.

METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Journals Full-Text Database and Wanfang Journals Full-Text Database were searched to find relevant original articles about methylated genes to be used in diagnosing colorectal tumours. A quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool (QADAS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included articles, and the Meta-disc 1.4 and SPSS 13.0 software programs were used for data analysis.

RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, and 4484 patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) were 73% (95%CI: 71%-75%) and 92% (95%CI: 90%-93%), respectively. For adenoma, the sensitivity and specificity were 51% (95%CI: 47%-54%) and 92% (95%CI: 90%-93%), respectively. Pooled diagnostic performance of SFRP2 methylation for CRC provided the following results: the sensitivity was 79% (95%CI: 75%-82%), the specificity was 93% (95%CI: 90%-96%), the diagnostic OR was 47.57 (95%CI: 20.08-112.72), the area under the curve was 0.9565. Additionally, the results of accuracy of SFRP2 methylation for detecting colorectal adenomas were as follows: sensitivity was 43% (95%CI: 38%-49%), specificity was 94% (95%CI: 91%-97%), the diagnostic OR was 11.06 (95%CI: 5.77-21.18), and the area under the curve was 0.9563.

CONCLUSION: Stool-based DNA testing may be useful for noninvasively diagnosing colorectal tumours and SFRP2 methylation is a promising marker that has great potential in early CRC diagnosis.

Accuracy of early detection of colorectal tumours using stool methylation markers: A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of methylation of genes in stool samples for diagnosing colorectal tumours.

METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Journal Full Text Database and Wanfang Journals Full-text Database were searched to find relevant original articles about methylated genes used in diagnosing colorectal tumours. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies items were used to evaluate the quality of the included articles, and the Meta-disc 1.4 and SPSS 13.0 software programs were used for data analysis.

RESULTS: Thirty-four articles met the inclusion criteria, and 4151 patients were included. Pooled diagnostic performances of SFRP2 methylation for colorectal cancer (CRC) provided the following results: the sensitivity was 79% (95%CI: 75%-82%), the specificity was 93% (95%CI: 90%-96%), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 47.57 (95%CI: 20.08-112.72), and the area under the curve was 0.9565. Additionally, the results of accuracy of SFRP2 methylation for detecting colorectal adenomas were as follows: the sensitivity was 43% (95%CI: 38%-49%), the specificity was 94% (95%CI: 91%-97%), the DOR was 11.06 (95%CI: 5.77-21.18), and the area under the curve was 0.9563.

CONCLUSION: Stool-based DNA testing may be useful for non-invasively diagnosing colorectal tumours, and SFRP2 methylation is a promising marker that has great potential in early CRC diagnosis.

DNA quantification of exfoliated colonocytes as a novel screening tool for colorectal cancer

AIMS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) sheds viable cells in the mucocelluar layer overlaying the colonic mucosa which travels distally alongside the faecal stream. These cells can be retrieved from the surface of the rectal mucosa. DNA quantification of these cells may be a marker of CRC, assessment of which was aim of this study.

METHODS

A prospective double-blinded study of 467 consecutive patients referred with symptoms suggestive of CRC. Cells were collected from the surface of the rectal mucosa and total DNA quantified. DNA scores were compared with outcome after subjects had completed bowel investigations. Analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed to determine the optimum cut-off point for a positive result.

RESULTS

107 of the 467 patients were excluded due to; excessive faecal contamination of samples (n = 84); declined investigations (n = 17); inappropriate referral (n = 5); unfit (n = 1). 263 patients had lower GI endoscopy; 89 CT colonography and 8 barium enema. The diagnosis were; CRC (n = 23), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 7), adenomatous polyps (AP) (n = 20) and no significant abnormality detected (n = 310). ROC analysis revealed that sensitivities at a specificity of 60% for detecting CRC were 91.3%; for CRC and IBD 86.7%; and for CRC, IBD and AP 72.0%.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients DNA quantification of cells retrieved from the surface of the rectal mucosa is sensitive for the detection of CRC. Although faecal contamination is a limitation of this technique, refinement and application of other molecular tests hold promise for a better non invasive method for the detection of CRC.

Fecal molecular markers for colorectal cancer screening

Despite multiple screening techniques, including colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, radiological imaging, and fecal occult blood testing, colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of death. As these techniques improve, their sensitivity to detect malignant lesions is increasing; however, detection of precursor lesions remains problematic and has generated a lack of general acceptance for their widespread usage. Early detection by an accurate, noninvasive, cost-effective, simple-to-use screening technique is central to decreasing the incidence and mortality of this disease. Recent advances in the development of molecular markers in faecal specimens are encouraging for its use as a screening tool. Genetic mutations and epigenetic alterations that result from the carcinogenetic process can be detected by coprocytobiology in the colonocytes exfoliated from the lesion into the fecal matter. These markers have shown promising sensitivity and specificity in the detection of both malignant and premalignant lesions and are gaining popularity as a noninvasive technique that is representative of the entire colon. In this paper, we summarize the genetic and epigenetic fecal molecular markers that have been identified as potential targets in the screening of colorectal cancer.

Epigenomic analysis of aberrantly methylated genes in colorectal cancer identifies genes commonly affected by epigenetic alterations

BACKGROUND

Determination of the profile of genes that are commonly methylated aberrantly in colorectal cancer (CRC) will have substantial value for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. However, there is limited knowledge of the DNA methylation pattern in CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the methylation profile of 27,578 CpG sites spanning more than 14,000 genes in CRC and in the adjacent normal mucosa with bead-chip array-based technology.

RESULTS

We identified 621 CpG sites located in promoter regions and CpG islands that were greatly hypermethylated in CRC compared to normal mucosa. The genes on chromosome 18 showed promoter hypermethylation most frequently. According to gene ontology analysis, the most common biologically relevant class of genes affected by methylation was the class associated with the cadherin signaling pathway. Compared to the genome-wide expression array, mRNA expression was more likely to be downregulated in the genes demonstrating promoter hypermethylation, even though this was not statistically significant. We validated ten CpG sites that were hypermethylated (ADHFE1, BOLL, SLC6A15, ADAMTS5, TFPI2, EYA4, NPY, TWIST1, LAMA1, GAS7) and 2 CpG sites showing hypomethylation (MAEL, SFT2D3) in CRC compared to the normal mucosa in the array studies using pyrosequencing. The methylation status measured by pyrosequencing was consistent with the methylation array data.

CONCLUSIONS

Methylation profiling based on bead-chip arrays is an effective method for screening aberrantly methylated genes in CRC. In addition, we identified novel methylated genes that are candidate diagnostic or prognostic markers for CRC.

Colorectal cancer prevention: choosing the most effective population strategy using bio-mathematical approaches

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally, though in theory at least, it is eminently preventable in many cases. Preventive strategies are either primary or secondary, but for population strategists, choosing the 'best' approach is not straightforward. Here, we summarize the potential role of bio-mathematical modelling, specifically focusing on a model that combines known details of crypt cell kinetics with stochastic models of cell birth and death processes. Examples are discussed of the potential population effects of an agent that modulates cell kinetics, such as aspirin, vs one that merely reduces mutational rates.

Fecal Adnab-9 binding as a risk marker for colorectal neoplasia

Adnab-9 binding in colonic tissue and effluent has been associated with an increased risk for colorectal neoplasia. We investigated if fecal binding by Adnab-9 may be used as a marker for colorectal neoplasia. A fecal-Adnab-9 ELISA was performed on samples of 249 patients and colonoscopic pathology results correlated. Fecal Adnab-9 binding was seen in 63% of patients with colorectal neoplasia (59% with colorectal cancer and 83% with adenoma), 33% with inflammatory bowel disease, 0% with hyperplastic polyps and 10% of controls. We conclude that fecal Adnab-9 binding is a promising risk marker for colorectal neoplasia.

Colorectal cancer screening in average risk individuals

Colorectal cancer is the third leading type of cancer, and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Prevention of colorectal cancer should be achievable by screening programs that detect adenomas in asymptomatic patients and lead to their removal. In this manuscript, we review the major screening modalities, the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, the data supporting their use, and various issues affecting the implementation of each test. Screening guidelines will be reviewed, and future techniques for colorectal cancer screening examined.

Non-invasive detection of colorectal tumours by the combined application of molecular diagnosis and the faecal occult blood test

The treatment of early-stage tumours decreases the overall mortality of colorectal tumour patients. In this retrospective study we determined the sensitivity and the specificity of the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and the molecular diagnosis (MD). We analysed 57 stool samples from patients with colorectal carcinomas for the presence of occult blood using a standard FOBT and for alterations in the three different tumour relevant markers APC, BAT26 and L-DNA. Stool samples from 44 control donors were analysed to determine the specificity of the applied methods. Twenty-nine (51%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 38-63%) stool samples of the cancer patients gave positive FOBT results. Thirty-seven (65%; CI: 52-76%) samples showed alterations in at least one DNA marker. Sixteen (28%) samples were positive only in the FOBT, and 24 (42%) samples showed a positive result exclusively in MD. The combined application of both methods resulted in a sensitivity of 93% (CI: 83-97%) and an overall specificity of 89% (CI: 76-95%). The combined application of FOBT and MD resulted in an overall sensitivity, which could not be achieved by any of the methods alone and which is in the range of invasive diagnostic methods.

A survey of individual preference for colorectal cancer screening technique

BACKGROUND

Due to the low participation in colorectal cancer screening, public preference for colorectal cancer screening modality was determined.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was performed of healthy ambulatory adults in a pediatrics primary care office and neighboring church. Overall preference was ranked for each of four colorectal cancer screening modalities: Faecal Occult Blood, Fiberoptic Sigmoidoscopy, Barium Enema and Colonoscopy. Four additional domains of preference also were ranked: suspected discomfort, embarrassment, inconvenience and danger of each exam.

RESULTS

80 surveys were analyzed, 57 of which were received from participants who had experienced none of the screening tests. Fecal Occult Blood Testing is significantly preferred over each other screening modality in overall preference and every domain of preference, among all subjects and those who had experienced none of the tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to increase public participation in colorectal cancer screening may be more effective if undertaken in the context of public perceptions of screening choices.