Esomeprazole 20 mg on-demand is more acceptable to patients than continuous lansoprazole 15 mg in the long-term maintenance of endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux patients: the COMMAND Study

BRAZILIAN CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (BRAZILIAN FEDERATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, FBG)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition in Brazil, affecting 12% to 20% of the urban population, with significant implications for patient quality of life and potential for complications.

OBJECTIVE

This paper focuses on the recent update of the Brazilian guidelines for GERD, a necessary revision due to advancements in knowledge and practice since the last publication over a decade ago. The update pays particular attention to the role and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acknowledging the growing concerns about their long-term use, adverse events, and overprescription.

METHODS

The methodology of the guideline update involved an extensive literature review in multiple languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese), drawing from major databases such as Medline, Embase, and SciELO-Lilacs.

RESULTS

This comprehensive approach resulted in a carefully curated selection of studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, specifically focusing on PPIs and other therapeutic strategies for GERD. The updated guidelines are presented in a user-friendly question-and-answer format, adhering to the PICO system (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) for clarity and ease of interpretation. The recommendations are supported by robust scientific evidence and expert opinions, enhancing their practical applicability in clinical settings. To ensure the reliability and clarity of the recommendations, the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was employed. This system categorizes the strength of recommendations as strong, weak, or conditional and classifies evidence quality as high, moderate, low, or very low. These classifications provide insight into the confidence level of each recommendation and the likelihood of future research impacting these guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The primary aim of these updated guidelines is to offer practical, evidence-based advice for the management of GERD in Brazil, ensuring that healthcare professionals are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to deliver optimal patient care.

BACKGROUND

•Gastrointestinal specialists rely heavily on guidelines to manage digestive pathologies effectively. The Brazilian clinical guideline for therapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an invaluable tool for these specialists.

BACKGROUND

•It critically analyzes practical aspects of therapy through 12 questions covering a wide range of topics, from behavioral measures to surgical and endoscopic indications.

BACKGROUND

•The recommendations in this guideline are justified using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), and experienced experts provide comments and suggestions at the end of each question.

On-demand Versus Continuous Maintenance Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background/Aims

Long-term maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly used to prevent relapse of reflux symptoms; however, due to concerns about safety of long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use, on-demand therapy is recommended as a long-term treatment modality. We compared the efficacy of on-demand and continuous PPI therapy for maintenance treatment of patients with GERD using meta-analysis.

Methods

Core electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing on-demand and continuous therapy in GERD patients. The primary outcome was treatment failure of maintenance therapy, and the secondary outcomes included symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction, and amount of PPI use.

Results

Overall, 11 studies were selected in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared with continuous PPI therapy, on-demand therapy showed similar outcomes for treatment failure (risk ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.07), particularly in the non-erosive esophageal reflux disease and mild erosive reflux disease group (risk ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.39-5.63). In studies including severe esophagitis patients, continuous PPI maintenance treatment was more effective (β, 0.127 [95% CI, 0.066-0.188]; P < 0.001). Severity of esophagitis was associated with higher efficacies of continuous maintenance therapy. The amount of daily PPI use was about half in the on-demand group compared to the continuous group (risk difference −0.52; 95% CI, −0.62-−0.42).

Conclusions

On-demand PPI therapy shows comparable efficacy to the continuous maintenance treatment in the non-erosive esophageal reflux disease and mild erosive reflux disease group, and can remarkably reduce the amount of PPI use. Therefore, on-demand therapy may be preferentially recommended in the maintenance treatment of GERD unaccompanied by severe esophagitis.

On-demand versus half-dose continuous therapy with esomeprazole for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

No consensus has been established regarding optimal long-term maintenance therapy in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of on-demand and continuous therapy with esomeprazole as maintenance treatments for GERD.

METHODS

Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy-proven GERD who received initial proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for 8 weeks were randomized to an on-demand group (esomeprazole 40 mg) or a continuous group (esomeprazole 20 mg). Intensities and frequencies of heartburn and acid regurgitation were assessed using a 6-point Likert scale (0 = no symptoms; 5 = very severe symptoms) and a 6-point frequency scale (0 = none; 5 = symptoms for > 5 days per week) at baseline (start of maintenance treatment) and after 12 weeks of treatment. Alleviation of symptoms was quantified using percentages of patients with a Likert scale or frequency scale of 0 or 1.

RESULTS

Of the 88 patients enrolled, 8 patients were excluded due to follow-up loss in early period of this study, and finally, 39 in the on-demand group and 41 in the continuous group were analyzed. No significant intergroup difference was found between Likert scale or frequency scale of heartburn or regurgitation at baseline. Percentages of symptom alleviations in the on-demand and continuous groups for intensity of heartburn were 56.4%/48.8% at baseline (P = .523) and 82.1%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .471), for frequency of heartburn were 61.5%/46.3% at baseline (P = .173) and 76.9%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .200), for intensity of regurgitation was 53.8%/43.9% at baseline (P = .374) and 82.1%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .471), and for frequency of regurgitation was 61.5%/56.1% at the baseline (P = .621) and 82.1%/82.9% at 12 weeks (P = .918), respectively. Furthermore, no significant intergroup difference was found for convenience of medication or subjective satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensities and frequencies of heartburn and regurgitation responded well to maintenance treatment in patients in the on-demand and continuous groups. On-demand therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg appears to be sufficient for maintenance treatment in GERD patients.

On-Demand Therapy with Proton Pump Inhibitors for Maintenance Treatment of Nonerosive Reflux Disease or Mild Erosive Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, concerns about the cost and/or inconvenience of continuous maintenance PPI treatment have led to the evaluation of various alternative approaches.

Aim

To assess the effectiveness of on-demand PPI therapy in the maintenance treatment of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) or mild erosive esophagitis (EE).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception until October 2, 2017, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing on-demand PPI versus placebo or daily PPI in the management of NERD or mild EE (Savary-Miller grade 1). Discontinuation of therapy during the trial was used as a surrogate for patient dissatisfaction and failure of symptomatic control. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) to evaluate the efficacy of on-demand PPI treatment. Separate analyses were conducted for studies comparing on-demand PPI with daily PPI and with placebo. Subgroup analysis was done based on NERD studies alone and on studies of both NERD and mild EE. These were analyzed using a random effects model.

Results

We included 10 RCTs with 4574 patients. On-demand PPI was superior to daily PPI (pooled OR = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.35, 0.72). On subgroup analysis in NERD patients only, pooled OR was 0.44 (0.29, 0.66). In studies including patients with NERD and mild EE, pooled OR was 0.76 (0.36, 1.60). For studies comparing on-demand PPI with placebo, pooled OR was 0.21 (0.15, 0.29); subgroup analyses of studies evaluating NERD only and studies conducted in NERD and mild EE showed similar results (pooled OR was 0.22 (0.13, 0.36) and 0.18 (0.11, 0.31), resp.).

Conclusions

On-demand PPI treatment is effective for many patients with NERD or mild EE. Although not FDA-approved, it may be adequate for those patients whose symptoms are controlled to their satisfaction.

Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a class of medications that reduce acid secretion and are used for treating many conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dyspepsia, reflux esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, and hypersecretory conditions (e.g. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome), and as part of the eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori bacteria. However, approximately 25% to 70% of people are prescribed a PPI inappropriately. Chronic PPI use without reassessment contributes to polypharmacy and puts people at risk of experiencing drug interactions and adverse events (e.g. Clostridium difficile infection, pneumonia, hypomagnesaemia, and fractures).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects (benefits and harms) associated with deprescribing long-term PPI therapy in adults, compared to chronic daily use (28 days or greater).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 10), MEDLINE, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). The last date of search was November 2016. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant studies. We screened 2357 articles (2317 identified through search strategy, 40 through other resources). Of these articles, we assessed 89 for eligibility.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials comparing at least one deprescribing modality (e.g. stopping PPI or reducing PPI) with a control consisting of no change in continuous daily PPI use in adult chronic users. Outcomes of interest were: change in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, drug burden/PPI use, cost/resource use, negative and positive drug withdrawal events, and participant satisfaction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed and extracted data and completed the risk of bias assessment. A third review author independently confirmed risk of bias assessment. We used Review Manager 5 software for data analysis. We contacted study authors if there was missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included six trials (n = 1758). Trial participants were aged 48 to 57 years, except for one trial that had a mean age of 73 years. All participants were from the outpatient setting and had either nonerosive reflux disease or milder grades of esophagitis (LA grade A or B). Five trials investigated on-demand deprescribing and one trial examined abrupt discontinuation. There was low quality evidence that on-demand use of PPI may increase risk of 'lack of symptom control' compared with continuous PPI use (risk ratio (RR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31 to 2.21), thereby favoring continuous PPI use (five trials, n = 1653). There was a clinically significant reduction in 'drug burden', measured as PPI pill use per week with on-demand therapy (mean difference (MD) -3.79, 95% CI -4.73 to -2.84), favoring deprescribing based on moderate quality evidence (four trials, n = 1152). There was also low quality evidence that on-demand PPI use may be associated with reduced participant satisfaction compared with continuous PPI use. None of the included studies reported cost/resource use or positive drug withdrawal effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people with mild GERD, on-demand deprescribing may lead to an increase in GI symptoms (e.g. dyspepsia, regurgitation) and probably a reduction in pill burden. There was a decline in participant satisfaction, although heterogeneity was high. There were insufficient data to make a conclusion regarding long-term benefits and harms of PPI discontinuation, although two trials (one on-demand trial and one abrupt discontinuation trial) reported endoscopic findings in their intervention groups at study end.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015

As an increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been reported in Japan, and public interest in GERD has been increasing, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology published the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009. Six years have passed since its publication, and there have been a large number of reports in Japan concerning the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and Barrett's esophagus during this period. By incorporating the contents of these reports, the guidelines were completely revised, and a new edition was published in October 2015. The revised edition consists of eight items: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, internal treatment, surgical treatment, esophagitis after surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract, extraesophageal symptoms, and Barrett's esophagus. This paper summarizes these guidelines, particularly the parts related to the treatment for GERD. In the present revision, aggressive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) maintenance therapy is recommended for severe erosive GERD, and on-demand therapy or continuous maintenance therapy is recommended for mild erosive GERD or PPI-responsive non-erosive GERD. Moreover, PPI-resistant GERD (insufficient symptomatic improvement and/or esophageal mucosal break persisting despite the administration of PPI at a standard dose for 8 weeks) is defined, and a standard-dose PPI twice a day, change in PPI, change in the PPI timing of dosing, addition of a prokinetic drug, addition of rikkunshito (traditional Japanese herbal medicine), and addition of histamine H2-receptor antagonist are recommended for its treatment. If no improvement is observed even after these treatments, pathophysiological evaluation with esophageal impedance-pH monitoring or esophageal manometry at an expert facility for diseases of the esophagus is recommended.

Randomized, multicenter study: on-demand versus continuous maintenance treatment with esomeprazole in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background

Most patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease experience symptomatic relapse after stopping acid-suppressive medication. The aim of this study was to compare willingness to continue treatment with esomeprazole on-demand versus continuous maintenance therapy for symptom control in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) after 6 months.

Methods

This multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled adults with NERD who were heartburn-free after 4 weeks’ treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg daily. Patients received esomeprazole 20 mg daily continuously or on-demand for 6 months. The primary variable was discontinuation due to unsatisfactory treatment. On-demand treatment was considered non-inferior if the upper limit of the one-sided 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the difference between treatments was <10 %.

Results

Of 877 patients enrolled, 598 were randomized to maintenance treatment (continuous: n = 297; on-demand: n = 301). Discontinuation due to unsatisfactory treatment was 6.3 % for on-demand and 9.8 % for continuous treatment (difference −3.5 % [90 % CI: −7.1 %, 0.2 %]). In total, 82.1 and 86.2 % of patients taking on-demand and continuous therapy, respectively, were satisfied with the treatment of heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, a secondary variable (P = NS). Mean study drug consumption was 0.41 and 0.91 tablets/day, respectively. Overall, 5 % of the on-demand group developed reflux esophagitis versus none in the continuous group (P < 0.0001). The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale Reflux dimension was also improved for continuous versus on-demand treatment. Esomeprazole was well tolerated.

Conclusions

In terms of willingness to continue treatment, on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to continuous maintenance treatment and reduced medication usage in patients with NERD who had achieved symptom control with initial esomeprazole treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02670642; Date of registration: December 2015.

Esomeprazole regimens for reflux symptoms in Chinese patients with chronic gastritis

AIM: To compare symptom control with esomeprazole regimens for non-erosive reflux disease and chronic gastritis in patients with a negative endoscopy.

METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was designed in line with clinical practice in China. Patients with typical reflux symptoms for ≥ 3 mo and a negative endoscopy who had a Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire score ≥ 8 were randomized to initial treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg once daily either for 8 wk or for 2 wk. Patients with symptom relief could enter another 24 wk of maintenance/on-demand treatment, where further courses of esomeprazole 20 mg once daily were given if symptoms recurred. The primary endpoint was the symptom control rate at week 24 of the maintenance/on-demand treatment period. Secondary endpoints were symptom relief rate, success rate (defined as patients who had symptom relief after initial treatment and after 24 wk of maintenance treatment), time-to-first-relapse and satisfaction rate.

RESULTS: Based on the data collected in the modified intention-to-treat population (MITT; patients in the ITT population with symptom relief after initial esomeprazole treatment, n = 262), the symptom control rate showed a small but statistically significant difference in favor of the 8-wk regimen (94.9% vs 87.3%, P = 0.0473). Among the secondary endpoints, based on the data collected in the ITT population (n = 305), the 8-wk group presented marginally better results in symptom relief after initial esomeprazole treatment (88.3% vs 83.4%, P = 0.2513) and success rate over the whole study (83.8% vs 72.8%, P = 0.0258). The 8-wk regimen was found to provide a 46% reduction in risk of relapse vs the 2-wk regimen (HR = 0.543; 95%CI: 0.388-0.761). In addition, fewer unscheduled visits and higher patient satisfaction supported the therapeutic benefits of the 8-wk regimen over the 2-wk regimen. Safety was comparable between the two groups, with both regimens being well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: Chinese patients diagnosed with chronic gastritis achieved marginally better control of reflux symptoms with an 8-wk vs a 2-wk esomeprazole regimen, with a similar safety profile.

Partnership in optimizing management of reflux symptoms: a treatment algorithm for over-the-counter proton-pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated heartburn and acid regurgitation are increasingly treated and managed using over-the-counter medications. However, with over-the-counter availability of antacids, alginates, histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), consumers need guidance as to appropriate options and how to use them.

METHODS

Relevant guidelines, studies, and reviews were identified via literature searches of PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar, as well as cross-referencing from the identified papers.

RESULTS

Antacids, alginates, and H2RAs are best suited to management of occasional heartburn, taken either before provocative meals or other triggers or on demand when symptoms arise. Over-the-counter PPIs are appropriate options across the range of symptom severity/frequency typically encountered in the pharmacy, but may be particularly appropriate for treatment of those with frequent and/or very bothersome heartburn. A 2-4 week course of daily PPIs can lead to complete resolution of frequent heartburn. Counseling is important to ensure that patients understand that failure of symptoms to resolve or a rapid return of symptoms while taking a PPI is an indication to consult a doctor, whereas a return of symptoms after a period of months may be an indication for just another course of treatment. The need for effective communication and for ensuring use of the correct medication in the over-the-counter setting puts much of the responsibility for management of heartburn and acid regurgitation on the pharmacist. A proposed algorithm that details when and how to use available over-the-counter medications is presented. This algorithm also highlights alarm features and atypical symptoms indicative of other underlying conditions that should be referred directly to a physician.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a simple algorithm will empower pharmacists and consumers alike and ensure consistent and appropriate care.

A randomized prospective study comparing the efficacy of on-demand therapy versus continuous therapy for 6 months for long-term maintenance with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan

AIM

To assess the efficacy of continuous therapy (cont) and on-demand therapy (on-demand) as maintenance therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Patients with upper GI endoscopy (EGD)-proven GERD who completed 8 weeks of initial therapy were randomized to cont (omeprazole 20 mg od) or on-demand (omeprazole 20 mg on-demand) group. Assessments by the Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale at baseline (at the start of maintenance therapy) and at 8-week, 16-week, and 24-week visits were made and EGD was performed at 24 weeks. Symptom relief was defined as percentages of patients whose GOS score of 1 or 2.

RESULTS

Of the 117 enrolled patients, cont/on-demand was 59/58 and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD)/reflux esophagitis (RE) before the initial therapy was 35/82. Symptom relief in cont/on-demand were 57.6%/48.3% at baseline (n.s.), 66.7%/54.7% at 8 week (n.s.), 64.6%/54.7% at 16 weeks (n.s.), and 66.7%/74.0% at 24 weeks (n.s.). When subjects were divided into NERD and RE, symptom relief in cont/on-demand were 33.3%/41.2% at baseline (n.s.), 43.8%/64.3% at 8 weeks (n.s.), 50.0%/42.9% at 16 weeks (n.s.), and 50.0%/69.2% at 24 weeks (n.s.) in NERD, while those were 68.3%/51.2% at baseline (n.s.), 76.3%/51.3% at 8 weeks (p < 0.05), 70.6%/59.0% at 16 weeks (n.s.), and 72.7%/75.7% at 24 weeks (n.s.) in RE, respectively. At 24-week EGD, all patients in NERD remained as NERD but number of healed patients was significantly higher in cont (85.3%) than in on-demand (44.4%) (p < 0.01) in RE.

CONCLUSIONS

Since NERD is defined by symptoms, as a result of the limited efficacy of continuous therapy, on-demand therapy would be sufficient as maintenance therapy in NERD patients. Regarding RE, continuous therapy would be recommended in terms of reduced symptoms and maintaining mucosal healing.

Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment

OBJECTIVES

To assess patients' preferences and estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatments.

METHOD

Patients were randomly selected from a multicenter clinical study to participate in the discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. Relevant treatment attributes were identified through literature review, clinical expert consultation, and focus groups. The DCE included 14 choice tasks composed of six attributes, three treatment profiles, and a "none"option considering orthogonality, D-efficiency, and level balance, while keeping patient response burden reasonable. Individual-level preferences and WTP were estimated by aggregate-level conditional logit and hierarchical Bayes analyses.

RESULTS

Our sample of 361, drawn from a clinical trial, had a mean age of 57 years, were primarily women (53%), and rated their GERD symptoms as mild/moderate (31%) and moderately severe/severe (7%). Most important attributes of GERD treatment were (in order) as follows: avoiding side effects, sleeping discomfort, daytime discomfort, dietary changes, medication cost, and treatment frequency. Simulations found that patients are willing to pay an additional US $36 to reduce susceptibility to side effects from moderate to mild or to decrease the frequency of sleeping discomfort. Patients 65 years or older were willing to pay less for daytime discomfort relief, while women would pay more to avoid sleeping discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Key factors concerning patients with GERD and their preference for treatment features to control GERD symptoms were confirmed. A DCE estimated WTP by GERD sufferers for relief from symptoms and avoidance of side effects using relevant treatment costs. These findings may help guide clinical treatment decisions for individual patients to improve GERD symptom control.

NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) represents the more common phenotypic presentation of GERD and comprises patients who have typical symptoms without any mucosal breaks at endoscopy. However, these patients are markedly heterogeneous from a pathophysiological point of view and should be correctly classified by means of 24 h impedance-pH testing, which enables detection of both acidic and weakly acidic reflux and correlation with symptoms. This technique is able to identify two subsets of NERD (that is, patients with an excess of acid or with a hypersensitive oesophagus to both acid and weakly acidic reflux) and patients with functional heartburn (who do not have any kind of reflux underlying their symptoms and must be excluded from the realm of GERD). The mechanisms of symptom generation are not clear in patients with NERD, but the presence of microscopic oesophagitis, including the dilation of intercellular spaces, seems to have a relevant role. Patients with NERD in whom acid is the main pathogenetic factor respond successfully to PPI therapy, while those with hypersensitive oesophagus to weakly acidic reflux need to be treated with reflux inhibitors or surgery, although the experience in this field is very scant. Patients with functional heartburn should undergo therapy with pain modulators, but large placebo-controlled trials are necessary.

[Updated guidelines 2012 for gastroesophageal reflux disease]

In 2010, a Korean guideline for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was made by the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, in which the definition and diagnosis of GERD were not included. The aim of this guideline was to update the clinical approach to the diagnosis and management of GERD in adult patients. This guideline was developed by the adaptation process of the ADAPTE framework. Twelve guidelines were retrieved from initial queries through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II process. Twenty-seven statements were made as a draft and revised by modified Delphi method. Finally, 24 consensus statements for the definition (n=4), diagnosis (n=7) and management (n=13) of GERD were developed. Multidisciplinary experts participated in the development of the guideline, and the external review of the guideline was conducted at the finalization phase.

Patient satisfaction with medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is increasingly regarded as an important aspect of measuring treatment success in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

OBJECTIVE

To review how satisfied patients with GERD are with their medication, and to analyze the usefulness of patient satisfaction as a clinical end point by comparing it with symptom improvement.

METHODS

Systematic searches of the PubMed and EMBASE databases identified clinical trials and patient surveys published between 1966 and 2009.

RESULTS

Twelve trials reported that 56% to 100% of patients were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment for GERD. Patient satisfaction levels were higher for PPIs than other GERD medications in two trials. The sample-size-weighted average proportion of patients 'satisfied' with their PPI after four weeks of treatment in trials was 93% (95% CI 87% to 99%), with 73% (95% CI 62% to 83%) being 'very satisfied'. In four surveys, the average proportion of patients 'satisfied' with their PPI treatment was 82% (95% CI 73% to 90%) and 62% (95% CI 48% to 75%) were 'very satisfied'. Seven trials found a positive association between patient satisfaction and symptom improvement, and two surveys between satisfaction and improved health-related quality of life. Three trials found that continuous treatment yielded higher rates of satisfaction than on-demand therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-half of patients were satisfied with their PPI medication in trials, and more patients were satisfied with PPIs than other medication types. An association between patient satisfaction and symptom resolution was found, suggesting that patient satisfaction is a useful end point for evaluating GERD treatment success.

On-demand PPI therapy in GERD

OPINION STATEMENT

Considerable clinical experience with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) attests to their efficacy and safety in short-and long-term therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in erosive esophagitis and endoscopy-negative (NERD) patients. One alternative to continuous PPI maintenance is PPI therapy administered noncontinuously (eg, "on demand"). Qualities of good PPI therapy for such a modality should include fast and sustained acid suppression. The newer-generation PPI esomeprazole has provided greater acid inhibition. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing on-demand PPI versus placebo or versus continuous PPI therapy in GERD patients have shown that on-demand therapy with currently available PPIs (esomeprazole in particular) appears to be effective in the long-term management of patients with NERD or mild esophagitis and uninvestigated forms of GERD, who make up the overwhelming majority of patients with GERD. This is because it is safe and provides adequate symptom control and sustains quality of life. However, it is not indicated in patients with severe erosive esophagitis or with complicated esophagitis (ie, Barrett's esophagus or stricture). On-demand PPI therapy is important for economic reasons, as it may save up to two thirds of daily doses of the drugs, with a considerable containment of drug expenses. For a long-term disease whose treatment is aimed primarily at symptom control, it is a sensible and cost-effective approach.

Intragastric acidity during administration of generic omeprazole or esomeprazole - a randomised, two-way crossover study including CYP2C19 genotyping

BACKGROUND

Generic omeprazole has been approved in many countries for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. However, clinical studies comparing generic to original proton pump inhibitors are limited.

AIMS

To compare the effect of generic omeprazole 20 mg/day with esomeprazole 20 mg/day on intragastric acidity and to investigate the influence of the CYP2C19 metabolizer status.

METHODS

In this randomised, single-blinded, two-way crossover study, 24 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative subjects, received generic omeprazole (Omep; Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany) 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for five consecutive days. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was recorded on day 5 of each treatment. CYP2C19 status was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

Over all, there were no statistically significant differences between generic omeprazole and esomeprazole with respect to median intragastric pH (3.5 and 3.9, P = 0.07), the total hours with intragastric pH >4 (10.4 and 11.3, P = 0.29), and during upright (9.6 and 9.1, P = 0.77) or supine (2.2 and 2.2, P = 0.94) position. However, in CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers, esomeprazole was superior to omeprazole, with the percentage of time with intragastric pH >3.0 and pH >3.5 being higher with esomeprazole than with generic omeprazole [Δ = 9% (P = 0.026) and Δ = 8% (P = 0.046), respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, generic omeprazole 20 mg appears to provide a similar intragastric acid control when compared with esomeprazole 20 mg. However, esomeprazole might be advantageous in subjects with a rapid CYP2C19 metabolizer status.

Short and long-term PPI treatment for GERD. Do we need more-potent anti-secretory drugs?

Because the reflux of the acidic gastric content into the esophagus plays a major role in the pathogenesis of symptoms of GERD and lesions of erosive esophagitis, acid suppression with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is currently the mainstay of anti-reflux therapy. There is a strong correlation between the degree of acid suppression provided by a given drug and its efficacy. The superiority of PPIs over other drugs (antacids, prokinetics and H(2)-receptor antagonists) has now been established beyond doubt, both for short- and long-term treatment. However, there are still some unmet therapeutic needs in GERD; hence, patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) are less responsive to PPIs than those with erosive esophagitis. Moreover, the efficacy of PPIs in patients with atypical symptoms is frequently limited to the relief of associated heartburn or regurgitation. With respect to safety, although most studies on short- and long-term PPI use have provided reassuring data, recent reports have drawn attention to potential side effects or drug-drug interference. Better healing rates in the most severe forms of esophagitis, or a faster onset of symptom relief, may require optimization of acid suppressive therapy with regard to the daily course of acid secretion, especially during the night. Different pharmacological approaches can be considered, with the ultimate goals of achieving faster, stronger and more-sustained acid inhibition. How a better pharmacological profile may translate into clinical benefit should now be tested in appropriate, controlled studies.

Esomeprazole: potent acid suppression in the treatment of acid-related disorders

Esomeprazole (S-omeprazole), an enantiomer of the racemate omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an isomer. This confers improved pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared with the racemate R/S-omeprazole. The difference in the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole and the R-isomer is due to reductions in total body clearance and first-pass metabolism in the liver. Pharmacodynamic studies showed that esomeprazole 40 mg provides greater intragastric acid control than respective doses of all the other proton pump inhibitors on the market. Several well-designed clinical trials, employing both endoscopic and symptomatic response criteria, have compared the efficacy of esomeprazole with that of other proton pump inhibitors in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients, and in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. In addition, the efficacy of esomeprazole for the healing and prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated dyspeptic symptoms and ulcers has been established. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and consequent clinical importance of esomeprazole in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: an evidence-based consensus

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common disorders in medical practice. A number of guidelines and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of GERD have been published in different countries, but a Brazilian accepted directive by the standards of evidence-based medicine is still lacking. As such, the aim of the Brazilian GERD Consensus Group was to develop guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GERD, strictly using evidence-based medicine methodology that could be clinically used by primary care physicians and specialists and would encompass the needs of physicians, investigators, insurance and regulatory bodies. A total of 30 questions were proposed. Systematic literature reviews, which defined inclusion and/or exclusion criteria, were conducted to identify and grade the available evidence to support each statement. A total of 11,069 papers on GERD were selected, of which 6,474 addressed the diagnosis and 4,595, therapeutics. Regarding diagnosis, 51 met the requirements for the analysis of evidence-based medicine: 19 of them were classified as grade A and 32 as grade B. As for therapeutics, 158 met the evidence-based medicine criteria; 89 were classified as grade A and 69 as grade B. In the topic Diagnosis, answers supported by publications grade A and B were accepted. In the topic Treatment only publications grade A were accepted: answers supported by publications grade B were submitted to the voting by the Consensus Group. The present publication presents the most representative studies that responded to the proposed questions, followed by pertinent comments. Follow examples. In patients with atypical manifestations, the conventional esophageal pH-metry contributes little to the diagnosis of GERD. The sensitivity, however, increases with the use of double-channel pH-metry. In patients with atypical manifestations, the impedance-pHmetry substantially contributes to the diagnosis of GERD. The examination, however, is costly and scarcely available in our country. The evaluation of the histological signs of esophagitis increases the diagnostic probability of GERD; hence, the observation of the dimensions of the intercellular space of the esophageal mucosa increases the probability of diagnostic certainty and also allows the analysis of the therapeutic response. There is no difference in the clinical response to the treatment with PPI in two separate daily doses when compared to a single daily dose. In the long term (>1 year), the eradication of H. pylori in patients with GERD does not decrease the presence of symptoms or the high recurrence rates of the disease, although it decreases the histological signs of gastric inflammation. It seems very likely that there is no association between the eradication of the H. pylori and the manifestations of GERD. The presence of a hiatal hernia requires larger doses of proton-pump inhibitor for the clinical treatment. The presence of permanent migration from the esophagogastric junction and the hernia dimensions (>2 cm) are factors of worse prognosis in GERD. In this case, hiatal hernias associated to GERD, especially the fixed ones and larger than 2 cm, must be considered for surgical treatment. The outcomes of the laparoscopic fundoplication are adequate.

Maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The aims of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are to cure mucosal breaks, control symptoms, and prevent complications (e.g. stricture, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to be the best drugs to cure esophagitis; however, a highrecurrence rate of about 80% was described after the completion of initial therapy. Regretfully, not so many physicians perform maintenance therapy in clinical practice. Histamine H2 receptor antagonists have an insufficient effect in maintenance therapy compared with PPIs; therefore, they could be prescribed for mild reflux esophagitis. Several clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of continuous PPI administration maintenance therapy for GERD. Among these trials, recent large-scale studies showed that esomeprazole was equal to or superior to other kinds of PPIs. On the other hand, on-demand PPI studies have been conducted, mainly in patients with nonerosive reflux disease or uninvestigated GERD;however, this strategy was less effective than continuous therapy in many studies. Because on-demand therapy is less expensive, it is worth confirming this strategy in further studies. Studies of maintenance therapy with investigations conducted for as long a period as 5 years have described that PPI maintenance therapy could be considered as effective, safe, and well tolerated.

The pharmacology of esomeprazole and its role in gastric acid related diseases

Esomeprazole (S-isomer of omeprazole) demonstrates a better pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile than the racemic product omeprazole. Esomeprazole's pharmacological activity of gastric acid secretion is through proton pump inhibition. The pharmacokinetic properties provide for an enhanced pharmacological effect. Esomeprazole is rapidly absorbed and the extent of absorption is higher resulting in higher systemic absorption of esomeprazole (bioavailability), which coupled with reduced clearance results in greater systemic exposure. This pharmacodynamic profile then provides for a prolongation of inhibition of gastric acid output and correlates well with its more beneficial therapeutic efficacy over omeprazole and some of the other proton-pump inhibitors. It has been well proven as an effective agent in the treatment of gastro-esophagitis reflux disease, (reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease), NSAID-induced gastric-intestinal symptoms and ulcers, Helicobacter pylori infection and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Esomeprazole has a good tolerability profile and a low potential for drug interaction.

Functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and reflux esophagitis are all distinct conditions—A debate: Con

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is currently defined as a condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes recurrent symptoms and/or complications. The clinical presentation of GERD has been recognized to be much broader than before, when the typical symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation were considered as the main clinical presentation. However, now it is recognized that GERD can present with various other mainly extraesophageal symptoms, abdominal pain, and even sleep disturbance. Moreover, there is an important overlap with functional gastrointestinal disorders such as functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. The morphologic spectrum of esophageal involvement in GERD encompasses erosive (erosive reflux disease ), Barrett's esophagus (BE), and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). However, there is still no consensus on whether GERD represents one disease that can progress from NERD to ERD and BE, or whether it is a spectrum of different conditions with its own clinical, pathophysiologic, and endoscopic characteristics. Recently published data suggest that mild erosive esophagitis behaves in a way similar to NERD and that there is considerable movement between these categories. But follow-up data also show that after 2 years, some patients with NERD or GERD Los Angeles A or B went on to develop severe GERD or even BE. A practical approach is to categorize patients with reflux symptoms into "functional heartburn" (ie, reflux symptoms and negative endoscopy and absent objective evidence of acid reflux into the esophagus), NERD (negative endoscopy but positive documentation of acid reflux into the esophagus), and ERD (erosions documented endoscopically). In conclusion, it appears that GERD is a disease with a spectrum of clinical and endoscopic manifestations, with characteristics that make it a continuum and not a categorical condition with separate entities. It is difficult to clearly delineate the spectrum of GERD based on the clinical, endoscopic, and pathophysiologic characteristics, but therapeutic trials and follow-up studies suggest that GERD is not composed of different conditions.

Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the publication of the Asia-Pacific GERD consensus in 2004, more data concerning the epidemiology and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have emerged. An evidence based review and update was needed.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group developed consensus statements using the Delphi approach. Relevant data were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded.

RESULTS

GERD is increasing in frequency in Asia. Risk factors include older age, male sex, race, family history, higher socioeconomic status, increased body mass index, and smoking. Symptomatic response to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test is diagnostic in patients with typical symptoms if alarm symptoms are absent. A negative pH study off therapy excludes GERD if a PPI test fails. The role for narrow band imaging, capsule endoscopy, and wireless pH monitoring has not yet been undefined. Diagnostic strategies in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. Weight loss and elevation of head of bed improve reflux symptoms. PPIs are the most effective medical treatment. On-demand therapy is appropriate for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. Patients with chronic cough, laryngitis, and typical GERD symptoms should be offered twice daily PPI therapy after excluding non-GERD etiologies. Fundoplication could be offered to GERD patients when an experienced surgeon is available. Endoscopic treatment of GERD should not be offered outside clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to clarify the role of newer diagnostic modalities and endoscopic therapy. Diagnostic strategies for GERD in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. PPIs remain the cornerstone of therapy.

Systematic review: maintenance treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitors taken 'on-demand'

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy 'on-demand' is often used as an alternative to continuous maintenance therapy in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

We conducted a systematic review with the specific objectives to ascertain whether on-demand PPI therapy was effective in preventing symptomatic relapse and to assess the relative efficacy of on-demand vs. continuous PPI maintenance strategy.

METHODS

Randomized-controlled clinical trials comparing on-demand PPI vs. placebo or on-demand vs. continuous PPI therapy in GERD patients were identified by searching the Medline database and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were found which met inclusion criteria. Out of the 17 studies: five investigated exclusively patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), four patients with NERD and mild oesophagitis, two patients with erosive oesophagitis only, and two patients with uninvestigated GERD symptoms, respectively. Four further studies were not investigating the effectiveness of the therapies but primarily pharmacoeconomic or quality of life parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the analysis of 17 studies, we can conclude that on-demand therapy with currently available PPI appears to be effective in the long-term management of patients with NERD or mild and uninvestigated forms of GERD, but not in patients with (severe) erosive oesophagitis.

The prevalence of and the clinical and demographic characteristics associated with high-intensity proton pump inhibitor use

INTRODUCTION

High-intensity proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is often recommended by physicians, though there is little proven benefit over standard PPI dosing in many clinical situations. We therefore sought to calculate the prevalence and predictors of high-intensity PPI use.

METHODS

We used a Canadian provincial administrative database to capture all PPI prescriptions between 1996 and 2004. A person was defined as a high-intensity user if he used PPIs at more than 1.5 times the standard PPI dose for greater than 45 of 90 days before the index date. The prevalence of high-intensity use was calculated at four index dates annually. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to determine clinical and demographic factors associated with high-intensity PPI use.

RESULTS

The prevalence of high-intensity PPI use increased from 9.7% in 1997 to 14.2% in 2004. Polypharmacy, concomitant use of antispasmodic/promotility agents, and recent endoscopy were most strongly predictive of high-intensity PPI use. Severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (as assessed by the number of GERD-related physician visits) was relatively weakly predictive of high-intensity PPI use.

CONCLUSIONS

High-intensity PPI use is becoming more prevalent over time, and its use is strongly associated with factors suggestive of a high degree of comorbidity and treatment failure. Further research into factors that drive high-intensity PPI prescription and use are required.

Long-term management of GERD in the elderly with pantoprazole

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases with age and elderly are more likely to develop severe disease. Older patients often complain of less severe or frequent heartburn than younger patients and they may present with atypical symptoms such as dysphagia, weight loss, or extraesophageal symptoms. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are central in the management of GERD and are unchallenged with regards to their efficacy. They are considered safe and more effective than histamine receptor antagonists for healing esophagitis and for preventing its recurrence using a long term maintenance treatment. PPI have minimal side effects and few slight drug interactions and are considered safe for long term treatment. Pantoprazole is significantly effective both for acute and long-term treatment with excellent control of relapse and symptoms. It is well tolerated even for long-term therapy and its tolerability is optimal. Pantoprazole shows to have minimal interactions with other drugs because of a lower affinity for cytocrome P450 than older PPIs. Although the majority of elderly has concomitant illnesses and receive other drugs, this does not adversely effect the efficacy of pantoprazole because of its pharmacokinetics, which are independent of patient age. Clinical practice suggests that a low dose maintenance of PPIs should be used in older patients with GERD.

Management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in primary care. Results from an observational study of 2 474 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to describe the management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) by primary care physicians (PCPs).

METHODS

This prospective survey was conducted in patients with suspected or previously diagnosed GERD. PCPs completed questionnaires at first consultation (M0) and at a 3-month follow-up visit (M3).

RESULTS

2 474 patients were available for analysis at M0 and 1 993 at M3. GERD was the reason for consultation in 84% of patients; 33% were consulting about reflux symptoms for the first time. Symptoms occurred once daily in 55% of patients and were considered very disruptive or incapacitating by 51%. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed at any time in 57% of patients and at M0 in 20%. Only 48% of demands for endoscopy agreed with current recommendations and this rate was not influenced by PCP training in the previous 6 months. Lifestyle measures were recommended in 95% of patients at M0. Proton pump inhibitors were prescribed in 98%, to be taken "on-demand" in 22-57% depending on symptom frequency. Therapeutic management was considered as very satisfactory by 81% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD managed in primary care is severe, leading to expensive, but effective diagnostic investigations and treatments. Agreement with recommendations for endoscopy is poor.

Clinical response (remission of symptoms) in erosive and non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Complete remission of symptoms and prevention of symptomatic recurrence are among the main therapeutic aims in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). In this context, a potent pharmacologic inhibition of gastric acid secretion plays a central role. The goal of antisecretory treatment in GORD is to maintain an intragastric pH greater than 4.0 for the longest possible time. This is best achieved by the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Tolerability and safety of different PPIs are similar and consistently high, but therapeutic efficacy may differ among them. Esomeprazole appears to achieve an intragastric pH greater than 4.0 for a larger number of hours compared with any other PPI. This is associated with a greater therapeutic efficacy of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in both complete remission of symptoms and prevention of symptomatic recurrence in GORD. This review provides evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of GORD-related symptoms in clinical practice.

An update on the available treatments for non-erosive reflux disease

Non-erosive reflux disease is defined as the presence of troublesome reflux symptoms, such as heartburn and regurgitation, in the absence of endoscopically-visible damage of the oesophageal mucosa. In comparison with erosive oesophagitis, non-erosive reflux disease is the most common clinical manifestation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Pathophysiologically, it is not a homogeneous disease as only approximately two-thirds of patients have truly acid-related symptoms. This explains the fact that patients with non-erosive reflux disease consistently show a poorer response to proton pump inhibitor treatment than patients with erosive oesophagitis. Nevertheless, profound acid inhibition by proton pump inhibitors is the recommended first-line treatment in patients suffering from this condition, both in the initial phase and for long-term care. Non-responders to proton pump inhibitor therapy should be subjected to a thorough examination and treated on an individual basis. Emerging data on the long-term course of reflux disease under routine clinical care have led to the adoption of new therapeutic strategies that would have been unthinkable only a few years ago.

Treatment of patients with heartburn without endoscopic evaluation: on-demand treatment after effective continuous administration of lansoprazole 15 mg

BACKGROUND

Relapse is frequent after initial treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux. An alternative strategy to intermittent or continuous therapy may be on-demand treatment.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of on-demand lansoprazole 15 mg and placebo treatment in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind study in two parallel groups of patients. In the acute study phase, all included patients (n = 203) were treated with lansoprazole 15 mg (once per day) for 4 weeks. At week 4, asymptomatic patients entered the 6-month, on-demand, follow-up phase and were randomized to receive either lansoprazole 15 mg (once per day) or placebo.

RESULTS

A higher percentage of patients in the lansoprazole group completed the 6-month follow-up than in the placebo group [81% vs. 61% (P = 0.003)]. Only 16% of patients in the lansoprazole group discontinued the study for insufficient control of heartburn vs. 28% in the placebo group (P = 0.046). The mean daily intake in patients who completed the study was 1-5 capsules/day in the lansoprazole 15 mg group.

CONCLUSIONS

On-demand treatment with lansoprazole 15 mg in symptomatic patients after short-term, continuous treatment is a promising therapeutic alternative to intermittent and continuous treatment to maintain heartburn control in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Pantoprazole 20 mg on demand is effective in the long-term management of patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

A total of 536 patients with endoscopically confirmed GORD grade 0/I were included in this multicentre study. In the acute phase, patients were treated with pantoprazole 20 mg o.d. for 4 weeks to obtain symptom relief. Symptom-free patients were included in the subsequent long-term phase, and were randomly treated on demand with either pantoprazole 20 mg or placebo for 6 months (antacids as rescue medication). After the 4 weeks acute phase, 439 symptom-free patients entered the long-term phase. The perceived average daily symptom load remained significantly lower during the 6-month on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg as compared to placebo. Both the rates for unwillingness to continue and number of additional antacids taken were also significantly lower with pantoprazole 20 mg than with placebo. Hence, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg is safe and effective in maintaining control of the symptoms heartburn, acid regurgitation and pain on swallowing symptoms in patients with GORD grade 0/I with superiority to placebo.

Review article: the long-term use of proton-pump inhibitors

More than 15 years after the launch of omeprazole in 1988, proton-pump inhibitors remain central to the management of acid-suppression disorders and are unchallenged with regard to their efficacy and popularity among doctors and patients. They are considered safe despite early concerns about the possibility of an association with cancer and gastric atrophy; current concerns about long-term proton-pump inhibitor therapy are centred mainly on a possible association with fundic gland polyps and between Helicobacter pylori and gastric atrophic changes. Long-term proton-pump inhibitor usage accounts for the majority of the total proton-pump inhibitor usage. Long-term usage is difficult to define and most patients take proton-pump inhibitors non-continuously. Data indicate that a substantial proportion of long-term users do not have a clear indication for their therapy and there is thus room for reduction or rationalization of treatment. Overall, on-demand therapy is more cost-effective than continuous therapy and should be considered wherever possible.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--the health economic implications

For the vast majority of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease appropriate care involves the management of symptoms with lifestyle advice and drugs. However, there is dissension about the appropriate use of endoscopy, whether drugs should be stepped up or down according to potency, how long drugs should be used for, the role of lifestyle advice, and, related to this, the role of patients' lifestyle choices. This exploration of the economics of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease reviews its cost burden to the UK, assesses published economic models for their strengths and weaknesses and examines current recommendations for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease management from a socioeconomic perspective. Drugs prescribed predominantly for dyspepsia cost the UK National Health Service a projected pound sterling 625 million in 2004, 7% of the primary care prescribing budget. When general practitioners consultations, endoscopies, over-the-counter sales and sickness absences are included the UK cost rises to pound sterling 1.5 billion: approximately half of this cost can be ascribed to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Emphasis upon regular review and stepping down treatment (while maintaining adequate symptom relief) is both clinically appropriate and resource efficient. Other cost-effectiveness issues largely lack objective answers because investment in treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease depends upon how much more, at the margin, society wishes to invest for further but diminishing symptom relief.

Treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease

Uncomplicated reflux disease comprises the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD). The objectives of treatment are the adequate control of symptoms with restoration of quality of life, healing of lesions and prevention of relapse. Treatment of NERD consists in the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for 2-4 wk, although patients with NERD show an overall poorer response to PPI treatment than patients with ERD owing to the fact that patients with NERD do not form a pathophysiologically homogenous group. For long-term management on-demand treatment with a PPI is probably the best option. In patients with ERD, therapy with a standard dose PPI for 4-8 wk is always recommended. Long-term treatment of ERD is applied either intermittently or as continuous maintenance treatment with an attempt to reduce the daily dosage of the PPI (step-down principle). In selected patients requiring long-term PPI treatment, antireflux surgery is an alternative option. In patients with troublesome reflux symptoms and without alarming features empirical PPI therapy is another option for initial management. Therapy should be withdrawn after initial success. In the case of relapse, the long-term care depends on a careful risk assessment and the response to PPI therapy.

Effects of pantoprazole 20 mg in mildgastroesophageal reflux disease: Once-daily treatment in the acute phase, and comparison of on-demand versus continuous treatment in the long term

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disorder,and although effective short-term treatment strategies are known, the rate of relapse within 1 year is as high as 90% despite successful acute treatment. Consequently, most patients with GERD require an effective long-term management strategy to achieve adequate symptom control and maintain mucosal healing.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was undertaken to compare the control ofGERD symptoms during long-term (24-week) treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg used on-demand or continuously in patients with mild GERD after complete relief of acute GERD symptoms.

METHODS

Patients with endoscopically confirmed Savary/Miller grade 0(normal mucosa) or I (patchy red lesions without white coating or with central white coating) GERD were enrolled in this multinational, multicenter study comprising 2 phases. In the first phase, which was open label, patients were treated with pantoprazole 20 mg QD for 4 weeks. The presence and intensity of the symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and pain on swallowing were assessed. In the second phase, which was an open-label, 24-week, randomized design, only patients completely free of GERD symptoms after acute treatment were included. During this phase, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg was directly compared with continuous treatment. The rate of failure to control GERD symptoms after 24 weeks of treatment was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subsequently, the difference between treatments (on-demand minus continuous) and its 95% CI were calculated, and the on-demand treatment was tested for noninferiority using a predefined noninferiority margin of 20%. The mean daily symptom loads were compared between the treatment groups using the 1-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test on a 5% α level. The point estimate of the difference was determined using the Hodges-Lehman estimator and the 1-sided 95% CI according to Moses. The number of patients unwilling to continue due to insufficient control of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and pain on swallowing was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (time-to-event) analysis. Analysis was performed in the same manner as for the rate of failure to control GERD symptoms, but the 95% CI was interpreted for statistical superiority.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients were enrolled in this study. At the end of theacute phase, 82.1% of patients in the per-protocol (PP) population and 79.1% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population were relieved of all GERD symptoms, and subsequently entered the long-term phase. After 24 weeks of treatment, analysis of the failure rates revealed that on-demand treatment was noninferior to continuous treatment because the 95% CI was completely below 20% (ITT, 12.1% difference [95% CI, -∞ to 18.9%]; PP, 10.1% difference [95% CI, -∞ to 17.7%]). The higher perceived mean (SD) daily symptom load in the on-demand group (ITT, 1.26 [1.491 vs 0.82 [1.341) was balanced by the reduced tablet intake in that group (PP, 0.51 [0.31 ] vs 0.97 [0.11 ] tablets/d; P < 0.001). With respect to the rate of patients unwilling to continue treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed between the on-demand and continuous groups (ITT/PP, 0.95/1.13 vs 0.95/1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of pantoprazole 20 mg tablets in patients withmild GERD, patients receiving on-demand treatment benefited despite their higher symptom load. The similar rates of unwillingness to continue treatment in both groups might suggest that patients were satisfied with the on-demand treatment strategy. On-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg was found to be noninferior compared with continuous therapy with regard to symptom control. Both on-demand and continuous treatments were well tolerated.

Systematic review: the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients

AIM

To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with either histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for patients with erosive oesophagitis or symptomatic heartburn.

METHOD

We conducted randomized-controlled trials of non-continuous therapy in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Because of variation in outcome measures statistical pooling of results was not possible. Results were analysed qualitatively. Four studies evaluated intermittent therapy of treatment 3 days a week with omeprazole 20 mg or daily with ranitidine which were not efficacious compared to a daily proton pump inhibitor. Famotidine 10 and 20 mg, ranitidine 75 mg and cimetidine 200 mg were efficacious in five on-demand studies for relief of symptomatic heartburn episodes. In three of four studies, evaluating only non-erosive (endoscopy-negative) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg and omeprazole 10 and 20 mg a day were efficacious using willingness to continue as an endpoint. Lansoprazole 30 mg and omeprazole 20 mg maintained symptom control in 60-70% of healed oesophagitis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist therapy is not effective in maintaining control in oesophagitis patients. H2-receptor antagonists are effective for relief of heartburn episodes. On-demand proton pump inhibitor therapy may work in a proportion of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.