Factors affecting the profitability of surgical procedures under ‘Payment by Results’

Time-driven cost analysis of pediatric liver biopsy completed in pediatric sedation clinic and operating room

BACKGROUND

Pediatric ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is a commonly performed procedure in children, and may be performed in a variety of clinical settings. However, there is little research on the relative costs associated with different sedation methods and locations.

OBJECTIVE

This study uses time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to identify relevant costs associated with different biopsy sedation techniques and locations to help inform providers and patients as well as guide value-conscious care. This study analyzes the direct costs associated with pediatric liver biopsy performed in an OR versus a dedicated pediatric sedation clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective review including data from consecutive procedures all completed by one board-certified interventional radiology physician between June 2021 and April 2024 was performed. Exclusion criteria included procedures with lack of timestamps (N = 3), and multiple procedures being completed causing a deviation from the standard pathway process (N = 19). Direct costs were calculated using cost capacity rates (CCR) and TDABC methodology. Propensity score matching between procedures performed in a sedation clinic versus an operating room (OR) was performed adjusting for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, and inpatient status, and subsequent matches were analyzed via paired t-test in SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 111 procedures performed in the OR (N = 71) or sedation clinic (N = 40) were found and considered for analysis (N = 55 male, N = 56 female; mean age = 9.13, SD = 6.69 years). A technical success rate of 100% and a complication frequency of 5% (N = 3, mean = 13.67, SD = 2.05, all grade 1) were observed. Complication frequency was not statistically significant between the sedation clinic (N = 1) and OR (N = 2) groups (P = 0.28). After propensity matching, N = 58 matched procedures (OR, N = 29; sedation clinic, N = 29) were included. Pre-procedure times in the sedation clinic were shorter in duration (62.11 ± 42.25) than in the OR (111.96 ± 62.11, P < 0.001). Total procedure times were also shorter in duration in the sedation clinic (14.07 ± 4.99) than in the OR (21.76 ± 18.22, P = 0.03). In addition, procedures completed in the OR utilized additional anesthesia staff for an average of 72 min, contributing to overall cost. The average total included costs for matched liver biopsy procedures were $1,089.51 ± 384.34 in the sedation clinic and $2,801.36 ± 1,201.52 in the OR (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biopsies completed in the sedation clinic were associated with significantly lower direct costs and were not associated with higher complication rates. These findings provide evidence for promoting pediatric sedation clinics as a safe and cost-effective location to perform liver biopsies in appropriate patients.

PitRSDNet: Predicting intra-operative remaining surgery duration in endoscopic pituitary surgery

Accurate intra-operative Remaining Surgery Duration (RSD) predictions allow for anaesthetists to more accurately decide when to administer anaesthetic agents and drugs, as well as to notify hospital staff to send in the next patient. Therefore, RSD plays an important role in improved patient care and minimising surgical theatre costs via efficient scheduling. In endoscopic pituitary surgery, it is uniquely challenging due to variable workflow sequences with a selection of optional steps contributing to high variability in surgery duration. This article presents PitRSDNet for predicting RSD during pituitary surgery, a spatio-temporal neural network model that learns from historical data focusing on workflow sequences. PitRSDNet integrates workflow knowledge into RSD prediction in two forms: (1) multi-task learning for concurrently predicting step and RSD; and (2) incorporating prior steps as context in temporal learning and inference. PitRSDNet is trained and evaluated on a new endoscopic pituitary surgery dataset with 88 videos to show competitive performance improvements over previous statistical and machine learning methods. The findings also highlight how PitRSDNet improves RSD precision on outlier cases utilising the knowledge of prior steps.

The Gap Between the Actual Cost and Tariffs of Global Surgical Procedures: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study in Qazvin Province, Iran

BACKGROUND

Iran's healthcare system has a significant discrepancy between the national tariff and the cost of global surgical procedures (GSPs). This study aimed to compare the actual costs of GSPs with national tariffs in Iran's public hospitals.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017. Using the census method, 6126 GSPs performed in three public hospitals were investigated in this study. Additionally, national tariffs from the Supreme Council of Health Insurance were obtained. The tariff-cost gap was the discrepancy between a GSP's actual costs and tariff. Multiple linear regression analysis determined factors affecting the tariff-cost gap.

RESULTS

The average actual cost of GSPs was 637 USD, while the average tariff was 495 USD. The reimbursement covered only 78% of the costs. The gap was higher in older (B=1.05, 95% CI: 0.76-1.35, P<0.001), females (B=26.7, 95% CI: 15.5-37.9, P<0.001), patients with a longer stay (B=81.2, 95% CI: 77.5-84.8, P<0.001), and procedures performed by full-time surgeons (B=67.3, 95% CI: 56.9-77.5, P<0.001). Furthermore, neurosurgery had the highest effect on forecasting the gap between actual costs and tariffs among surgical specialties (B=346.9, 95% CI: 214.3-479.5, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Public hospitals suffer from large financial losses due to the national tariff for many GSPs not covering their actual costs. It is suggested that tariffs be increased for certain customer segments that can bear higher costs and global tariffs be adjusted to match actual service delivery costs.

Modelling the economic constraints and consequences of anaesthesia associate expansion in the UK National Health Service: a narrative review

Shortages in the physician anaesthesia workforce have led to proposals to introduce new staff groups, notably in the UK National Health Service (NHS) Anaesthesia Associates (AAs) who have shorter training periods than doctors and could potentially contribute to workflow efficiencies in several ways. We analysed the economic viability of the most efficient staffing model, previously endorsed by both the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists, wherein one physician supervises two AAs across two operating lists (1:2 model). For this model to be economically rational (something which neither national organisation considered), the employment cost of the two AAs should be equal to or less than that of a single supervisor physician (i.e. AAs should be paid <50% of the supervisor's salary). As the supervisor can be an autonomous specialty and specialist (SAS) doctor, this sets the economically viable AA salary envelope at less than £40,000 per year. However, we report that actual advertised AA salaries greatly exceed this, with even student AAs paid up to £48,472. Economically, one way to justify such salaries is for AAs to become autonomous such that they eventually replace SAS doctors at a lower cost. We discuss some other options that might increase AA productivity to justify these salaries (e.g. ≥1:3 staffing ratios), but the medico-political consequences of each of them are also profound. Alternatively, the AA programme should be terminated as economically nonviable. These results have implications for any country seeking to introduce new models of working in anaesthesia.

Cost-effectiveness of the ADVISE trial: An intraoperative OCT protocol in DMEK surgery

The intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) is recently introduced in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery, which aims to increase clinical performance and surgery safety. However, the acquisition of this modality is a substantial investment. The objective of this paper is to report on the cost-effectiveness of an iOCT-protocol in DMEK surgery with the Advanced Visualization in Corneal Surgery Evaluation (ADVISE) trial. This cost-effectiveness analysis uses data 6 months postoperatively from the multicentre prospective randomized clinical ADVISE trial. Sixty-five patients were randomized to usual care (n = 33) or the iOCT-protocol (n = 32). Quality-Adjusted Life Years (EQ-5D-5L), Vision-related Quality of Life (NEI-VFQ-25) and self-administered resources questionnaires were administered. Main outcome is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and sensitivity analyses. The iOCT protocol reports no statistical difference in ICER. For the usual care group compared with the iOCT protocol, respectively, the mean societal costs are €5027 compared with €4920 (Δ€107). The sensitivity analyses report the highest variability on time variables. This economic evaluation learned that there is no added value in quality of life or cost-effectiveness in using the iOCT protocol in DMEK surgery. The variability of cost variables depends on the characteristics of an eye clinic. The added value of iOCT could gain incrementally by increasing surgical efficiency, and aiding in surgical decision-making.

A timeline of surgical lighting - Is automated lighting the future?

High quality surgical lighting is central to successful performance in the operating room and therefore to both patient care and treatment. This article discusses the origins of surgical lighting from the 1800s to today, with a focus on the four main forms. Their uses, advantages, and disadvantages are evaluated in an effort to identify the improvements required to improve today's current state of surgical lighting. Whilst these four mainstream types have served well for the past thirty years, the literature exposes opportunities for improvement and can be used to guide the pathway to transition from manual conventional methods to a more automated lighting (AL) approach. The concept of AL has been proposed using established and known technical approaches such as artificial intelligence (AI), 3D sensor tracking algorithms and thermal imaging. Whilst AL seems incredibly promising, further focused research must be undertaken to maximise its' effectiveness and allow for successful integration of this new technology into operating rooms today.

Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy may be superior to laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in terms of costs and profit: a retrospective pair-matched cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

A direct comparison of the cost-benefit analysis of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RPA) versus the minimally invasive transperitoneal access (LTA) approach is currently lacking. We hypothesized that RPA is more cost effective than LTA; promising significant savings for the healthcare system in an era of ever more limited resources.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective observational cohort study based on data from our Endocrine Surgery Registry. Patients who were operated upon between 2019 and 2022 were included. After pair-matching, both cohorts (RPA vs. LTA) were compared for perioperative variables and treatment costs (process cost calculation), revenue and profit.

RESULTS

Two homogenous cohorts of 43 patients each (RPA vs. LTA) were identified following matching. Patient characteristics between the cohorts were comparable. In terms of both treatment-associated costs and profit, the RPA procedure was superior to LTA (costs: US$5789.99 for RPA vs. US$6617.75 for LTA, P = 0.043; profit: US$1235.59 for RPA vs. US$653.33 for LTA, P = 0.027). The duration of inpatient treatment and comorbidities significantly influenced the cost of treatment and the overall profit.

CONCLUSIONS

RPA appears not only to offer benefits over LTA in terms of perioperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, but also has a superior financial cost/benefit profile.

The Golden Patient Initiative: A Systematic Review

Operating theatres and surgical resource consumption comprise a significant proportion of healthcare costs. Inefficiencies in theatre lists remain an important focus for cost management, along with reducing patient morbidity and mortality. With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number of patients on theatre waiting lists has surged. Hence, there is a pressing need to utilise the already limited theatre time and fraught resources with innovative methods. In this systematic review, we discuss the Golden Patient Initiative (GPI), in which the first patient on the operating list is pre-assessed the day prior to surgery, and we aim to assess its impact and overall efficacy. A literature search using the following four databases was conducted to identify and select all clinical research concerning the GPI: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and the Cochrane library. Two independent authors screened articles against the eligibility criteria, using a process adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extracted included outcomes measured, follow-up period, and study design. The results showed significant heterogeneity, and hence a narrative review was conducted; 13 of the 73 eligible articles were included for analysis. Outcomes included delay in theatre start time, number of surgical case cancellations, and changes to total case numbers. Across the studies, a 19-30-minute improvement in theatre start time was reported (p<0.05), as well as a statistically significant decrease in case cancellations. Our analysis provides encouraging conclusions with regard to greater theatre efficiency following the application of GPI, a low-cost solution that can easily be implemented to help improve patient safety and lead to cost savings. However, at present, it is largely implemented among local trusts, and hence larger multi-centre studies are required to gather conclusive evidence about the efficacy of the initiative.

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Mesh Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Incisional Hernias following Stoma Closure Surgery

BACKGROUND

Stoma closure is a widely performed surgical procedure, with 6295 undertaken in England in 2018 alone. This procedure is associated with significant complications; incisional hernias are the most severe, occurring in 30% of patients. Complications place considerable financial burden on the NHS; hernia costs are estimated at GBP 114 million annually. As recent evidence (ROCSS, 2020) found that prophylactic meshes significantly reduce rates of incisional hernias following stoma closure surgery, an evaluation of this intervention vs. standard procedure is essential.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was conducted using data from the ROCSS prospective multi-centre trial, which followed 790 patients, randomly assigned to mesh closure (n = 394) and standard closure (n = 396). Quality of life was assessed using mean EQ-5D-3L scores from the trial, and costs in GBP using UK-based sources over a 2-year time horizon.

RESULTS

The CUA yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of GBP 128,356.25 per QALY. Additionally, three univariate sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate an increased benefit with mesh prophylaxis, but at an increased cost. Although the intervention is cost-ineffective and greater than the ICER threshold of GBP 30,000/QALY (NICE), further investigation into mesh prophylaxis for at risk population groups is needed.

The effect of overlapping surgical scheduling on operating theatre productivity: a narrative review

This article reviews the background to overlapping surgery, in which a single senior surgeon operates across two parallel operating theatres; anaesthesia is induced and surgery commenced by junior surgeons in the second operating theatre while the lead surgeon completes the operation in the first. We assess whether there is any theoretical basis to expect increased productivity in terms of number of operations completed. A review of observational studies found that while there is a perception of increased surgical output for one surgeon, there is no evidence of increased productivity compared with two surgeons working in parallel. There is potential for overlapping surgery to have some positive impact in situations where turnover times between cases are long, operations are short (<2 h) and where 'critical portions' of surgery constitute about half of the total operation time. However, any advantages must be balanced against safety, ethical and training concerns.

The process of estimating the cost of surgery: Providing a practical framework for surgeons

Over the last decades, health care costs have been increasing at an alarming, exponential rate which is considered unsustainable. Surgical care utilizes one-third of health care costs. Estimating, evaluating, and understanding the cost of surgery is a vital step towards cost management and reduction. Current cost estimation studies and cost-effectiveness studies have vast disparities in their methodology, with published costs of Operating Room varying from as low as $7 and as high as $113 per minute. Costs in surgery are distinguished as direct and indirect. Allocation of direct costs involves identification, measurement, and valuation processes. Allocation of indirect costs involves the allocation of capital and overhead costs and of indirect department costs. Annualised capital costs and overhead hospital costs are then allocated to surgery by either the cost-centre allocation or the activity-based allocation frameworks. Indirect department costs are allocated to a specific surgery by weighted service allocation or hourly rate allocation or inpatient day allocation, or marginal markup allocation. The growing societal, financial and political pressure for cost reduction has brought cost analysis to the forefront of healthcare discussions. Thus, we believe that almost every single surgeon will eventually enter the field of healthcare economics by necessity. This review aims to provide surgeons with a practical framework for engaging in cost estimation studies.

Productivity in relation to organization of a surgical department: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Responsible and efficient resource utilization are important factors in healthcare. The aim of this study was to investigate how total case time differs between two differently organized surgical departments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of a cohort of patients undergoing elective surgery for breast cancer or malignant melanoma in a university hospital setting in Sweden. All patients were operated on by the same set of surgeons but in two different surgical departments: a general surgery (GS) and a cardiothoracic (CT) surgery department. Patients were selected to the two departments from a waiting list in the order of referral for surgery. The effect of being operated on at the CT department compared to the GS department was estimated by linear regression.

RESULTS

The final study cohort comprised 349 patients in the GS department and 177 patients in the CT department. Both groups were similar regarding surgical procedures, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, body mass index, age, sex, and the skill level of the operating surgeon. These covariates were included in the linear regression model. The total case time, defined by the Procedural Time Glossary as room set-up start to room clean-up finish, was significantly shorter for the patients who underwent a surgical procedure at the CT department compared to the GS department, even after adjusting for the background characteristics of the patients and surgeon. After adjusting for the selected covariates, the average difference in total case time between the two departments was - 30.67 min (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly shorter total case time was measured for operations in the CT department. Plausible explanations may be more beneficial organizational factors, such as staffing ratio, skill mix in the operating room team, and working behavioral aspects regarding resource utilization.

[Time management in operating rooms-a cross-sectional study to evaluate estimated and objective durations of otorhinolaryngologic surgical procedures]

Hintergrund

Die Gestaltung des Operations(Op.)-Programms im klinischen Alltag ist von hoher Wichtigkeit für die Wirtschaftlichkeit. Gleichzeitig muss die Einhaltung von Arbeitszeiten unterschiedlicher Berufsgruppen berücksichtigt werden.

Ziel der Arbeit

Um Fehlerquellen bei der Planung aufzudecken, wurden durch Chirurgen geschätzte mit objektiv erhobenen Zeiten (u. a. Schnitt-Naht-Zeit) verglichen.

Material und Methoden

In einer retrospektiven Analyse wurden 1809 Operationen im Jahr 2018 (22 verschiedene Op.-Arten) durch 31 Operateure (12 Fach- [FÄ] und 19 Assistenzärzte [AÄ]) hinsichtlich ihrer Dauer verglichen und mittels Mann-Whitney-U-Test auf Signifikanz geprüft.

Ergebnisse

Der Vergleich der objektiven Zeiten von FÄ und AÄ zeigt signifikante Unterschiede in der Schnitt-Naht-Zeit bzw. der Summe aus Schnitt-Naht-Zeit und Zeit der chirurgischen Maßnahmen für 6 von 15 Op.-Arten (p < 0,001). Die durch FÄ geschätzte Nachbereitungszeit wich bei 2 von 22 Op.-Arten von der objektiven Zeit ab (p < 0,05), die durch AÄ geschätzte Zeit bei 7 von 15 Op.-Arten (p < 0,05). Hinsichtlich der Schnitt-Naht-Zeit verschätzten sich FÄ bei 7 von 22 (p < 0,05), AÄ bei 3 von 15 (p < 0,05) Op.-Arten. Die durch FÄ geschätzte Vorbereitungszeit wich bei 16 von 22 Op.-Arten signifikant von der objektiven Zeit ab (p < 0,05), bei AÄ bei 7 von 15 (p < 0,001). Vor- und Nachbereitungszeiten wurden durch FÄ unter‑, Schnitt-Naht-Zeiten überschätzt. AÄ unterschätzten alle Zeiten.

Schlussfolgerung

Bei der OP-Planung muss die Erfahrung des durchführenden Chirurgen berücksichtigt werden. Eine Verbesserung durch verminderte subjektive Fehleinschätzung kann möglicherweise mithilfe spezieller Algorithmen gelingen.

Rational performance metrics for operating theatres, principles of efficiency, and how to achieve it

BACKGROUND

Several performance metrics are commonly used by National Health Service (NHS) organizations to measure the efficiency and productivity of operating lists. These include: start time, utilization, cancellations, number of operations and gap time between operations. The authors describe reasons why these metrics are flawed, and use clinical evidence and mathematics to define a rational, balanced efficiency metric.

METHODS

A narrative review of literature on the efficiency and productivity of elective NHS operating lists was undertaken. The aim was to rationalize how best to define and measure the efficiency of an operating list, and describe strategies to achieve it.

RESULTS

There is now a wealth of literature on how optimally to measure the performance of elective surgical lists. Efficiency may be defined as the completion of all scheduled operations within the allocated time with no over- or under-runs.

CONCLUSION

Achieving efficiency requires appropriate scheduling using specific procedure mean (or median) times and their associated variance (standard deviation or interquartile range) to calculate the probability they can be completed on time. The case mix may be adjusted to yield better time management. This review outlines common misconceptions applied to managing scheduled operating theatre lists and the challenges of measuring unscheduled operations in emergency settings.

Shortened cataract surgery by standardisation of the perioperative protocol according to the Joint Commission International accreditation: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of standardisation of the perioperative protocol based on the Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation guidelines for operating time in cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Single centre in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Between March 2014 and June 2016, 3127 patients underwent cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia including 2581 and 546 patients before and after JCI accreditation, respectively.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

We compared three time periods, comprising the preprocedure/surgery time (pre-PT), PT and post-PT, and total PT (TPT) of cataract surgery between patients before and after JCI accreditation, by regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and cataract surgery-associated confounders.

RESULTS

The main outcomes were pre-PT, PT, post-PT and TPT. Pre-PT (19.8±10.5 vs 13.9±8.5 min, p<0.001) and post-PT (3.5±4.6 vs 2.6±2.1 min, p<0.001) significantly decreased after JCI accreditation, while PT did not significantly change (16.8±6.7 vs 16.2±6.3 min, p=0.065). Consequently, TPT decreased on average by 7.3 min per person after JCI accreditation (40.1±13.4 vs 32.8±10.9 min, p<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, pre-PT (β=-5.82 min, 95% CI -6.75 to -4.88), PT (β=-0.76 min, 95% CI -1.34 to -1.71), post-PT (β=-0.85 min, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.45) and TPT (β=-7.43 min, 95% CI -8.61 to -6.24) were significantly shortened after JCI accreditation.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative protocol standardisation, based on JCI accreditation, shortened TPT in cataract surgery under local anaesthesia.

What Factors Influence Reimbursement for 1 to 2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine reimbursement associated with an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and the demographic factors influencing reimbursement for an ACDF.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ACDF has been shown to be a cost-effective procedure. However, there has been minimal analysis of factors influencing reimbursement for this procedure.

METHODS

Clinical and financial data were retrospectively reviewed for 176 patients undergoing an ACDF procedure in 2013 and 2014. Patients were included if they had primary ACDF and excluded if they were treated for a traumatic cervical spine fracture, infection, failed primary procedure, front/back procedure, or total disc replacement procedure. Clinical factors analyzed included number of levels fused, surgical time, length of stay in the hospital, estimated blood loss, implant type, Charleson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and preoperative diagnosis. Payer type and reimbursement associated with physician and hospital fees were collected for each patient. A multiple linear regression model determined the factors influencing reimbursement data using a backward conditional stepwise methodology. Variables were only included in multivariate analysis if there was a significant (P < 0.05) impact on reimbursement within univariate analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The average reimbursement per patient was $24,622 (+/- standard deviation of 14,616). The only significant factors influencing reimbursement was payer type (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). These two independent multivariate determinants of reimbursement only accounted for 18.6% of reimbursement variability.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial variability in reimbursement for ACDF procedures. Multivariate analysis indicates that payer type and length of hospital stay significantly influence reimbursement. Our model, however, only explained a small proportion of reimbursement variability indicating that factors outside our analysis may significantly affect hospital reimbursement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Trauma theatre productivity - Does the individual surgeon, anaesthetist or consultant presence matter?

INTRODUCTION

With rising NHS clinical and financial demands, improving theatre efficiency is essential to maintain quality of patient care. Consistent teams and consultant presence have been shown to improve outcomes and productivity in elective orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on trauma theatre productivity of different surgeons and anaesthetists working together in a Major Trauma Centre. The influence of consultant presence and weekend operating on productivity was also considered.

METHODS

Data relating to a single orthopaedic trauma theatre was gathered retrospectively for a two-year period. Variables including orthopaedic and anaesthetic consultant presence, number and complexity of operations performed and procedure start times were collected for daily trauma lists. Individual anaesthetic and orthopaedic consultants were compared by productivity outcomes. The impact of surgeons operating more frequently with one anaesthetist was also examined.

RESULTS

Data relating to 2384 patients undergoing a total of 2787 procedures was collected. Orthopaedic consultant presence at the first surgical case (p < 0.05) and for 50% or greater of cases (p < 0.05) lead to higher mean number of cases performed per list and reduced turnaround time. Despite working with a significantly higher number of different consultant anaesthetists (p < 0.001) in year two, the productivity of surgeons as judged by list start time, total cases per list and total operating time was not significantly affected. Significantly earlier start times (p < 0.001) and shorter turnaround times (p < 0.001) at weekends led to maintained productivity despite shorter theatre time. No significant difference in productivity was found when comparing individual anaesthetic and orthopaedic consultants. Productivity was not significantly increased by surgeons operating more frequently with one individual anaesthetist.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of an acute trauma theatre, orthopaedic consultant presence led to increased productivity. Furthermore, individual surgeon and anaesthetist pairings had no effect on overall productivity. Future efforts to improve productivity should focus on achieving earlier start times, consultant supervision of lists and reduced turnaround times between cases.

Measuring skin necrosis in a randomised controlled feasibility trial of heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the PREHEAT trial

Background

Essential strategies are needed to help reduce the number of post-operative complications and associated costs for breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery. Evidence suggests that local heat preconditioning could help improve the provision of this procedure by reducing skin necrosis. Before testing the effectiveness of heat preconditioning in a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT), we must first establish the best way to measure skin necrosis and estimate the event rate using this definition.

Methods

PREHEAT is a single-blind randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing local heat preconditioning, using a hot water bottle, against standard care on skin necrosis among breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery. The primary objective of this study is to determine the best way to measure skin necrosis and to estimate the event rate using this definition in each trial arm. Secondary feasibility objectives include estimating recruitment and 30 day follow-up retention rates, levels of compliance with the heating protocol, length of stay in hospital and the rates of surgical versus conservative management of skin necrosis. The information from these objectives will inform the design of a larger definitive effectiveness and cost-effectiveness RCT.

Discussion

This article describes the PREHEAT trial protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan, which includes the pre-specified criteria and process for establishing the best way to measure necrosis. This study will provide the evidence needed to establish the best way to measure skin necrosis, to use as the primary outcome in a future RCT to definitively test the effectiveness of local heat preconditioning. The pre-specified statistical analysis plan, developed prior to unblinded data extraction, sets out the analysis strategy and a comparative framework to support a committee evaluation of skin necrosis measurements. It will increase the transparency of the data analysis for the PREHEAT trial.

Trial registration

ISRCTN ISRCTN15744669. Registered 25 February 2015

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-017-0223-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of two surgical suture techniques in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty

BACKGROUND

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) are two standard surgical procedures for treatment of snoring and sleep apnea. In a prospective clinical trial, we compared a standard simple interrupted suture technique for closure of the tonsillar pillars with a running locked suture.

METHODS

Each suture technique was randomly assigned either to the left or the right tonsillar pillars in 28 patients. During the first week, patients were daily checked for suture dehiscence and again on days 10 and 21, the end of followup. Time to perform the sutures was measured intraoperative and surgical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

During followup, suture dehiscence was observed in 15/28 interrupted and 16/28 running sutures (p > 0.5). If a dehiscence occurred during the observation period, the median day of dehiscence was 10 (1 and 3 quartile: 5.75 and 17) days for the interrupted suture and 10 (5-11) days for the running locked suture technique (p > 0.05). The mean (± SD) surgical time for the interrupted suture was 5.2 ± 1.9 and 3.5 ± 1.8 min for the running locked suture (p < 0.001). Postoperative bleedings occurred in 4/28 running sutures and 2/28 interrupted sutures.

CONCLUSION

The running locked suture technique is an equally safe and time saving way of wound closure in UPPP and ESP.

Truncal varicose vein diameter and patient-reported outcome measures

Background

Varicose veins and chronic venous disease are common, and some funding bodies ration treatment based on a minimum diameter of the incompetent truncal vein. This study assessed the effect of maximum vein diameter on clinical status and patient symptoms.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study of patients presenting with symptomatic varicose veins to a tertiary referral public hospital vascular clinic between January 2011 and July 2012. Patients underwent standardized assessment with venous duplex ultrasonography, and completed questionnaires assessing quality of life (QoL) and symptoms (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, EuroQol Five Domain QoL assessment and EuroQol visual analogue scale). Clinical scores (Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) class) were also calculated. Regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between QoL, symptoms and vein diameter.

Results

Some 330 patients were assessed before surgery. The median maximum vein diameter was 7·0 (i.q.r. 5·3–9·2) mm overall, 7·9 (6·0–9·8) mm for great saphenous vein and 6·0 (5·2–8·9) mm for small saphenous vein. In linear regression analysis, vein diameter was shown to have a significant association with VCSS (P = 0·041). For every 1-mm increase in vein diameter, there was a 2·75-fold increase in risk of being in CEAP class C4 compared with C2. No other QoL or symptom measures were related to vein diameter.

Conclusion

Incompetent truncal vein diameter was associated with increasing VCSS, but not a variety of other varicose vein disease-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measures.

Pensions, tax and the anaesthetist: significant implications for workforce planning

This paper shows how recent tax changes to pensions (i.e. new lifetime and annual allowance contribution limits) mean that NHS consultants will need to adopt one of four rational strategies to work and financial planning. Two of those strategies (termed 'Earn Fast, Drop Out' and 'Never Enter') involve a break between work and pensions. The logical consequence of this break is that consultants may exercise options to maximise their total income, which in turn will result in less work within the NHS and more work in alternative higher paying (e.g. private) sectors. A third strategy ('Go Slow, Stay Low') also involves less-than-full-time NHS work. Only one option ('Do Nothing' as a result of the tax changes) has no effect. In short, the tax changes will predictably lead to future senior consultants devoting proportionately much less of their time to NHS work than before. The article discusses the important implications of this conclusion for NHS workforce planning.

Theater Cost Is £16/Minute So What Are You Doing Just Standing There?

The purpose of this study was to measure the time to perform particular activities in the operating room and calculate the cost per minute to perform each activity. We timed how long it takes to perform 15 individual activities carried out by orthopedic trainees during total hip and knee arthroplasty. We developed an algorithm, and then measured the time taken for the preparation of 20 consecutive patients using it. With the algorithm, overall preparation time was reduced by 25.32% for each hip arthroplasty and by 27.60% (P < .0001) for each knee arthroplasty, saving £84.32 and £93.44 per case, respectively. Coordination between surgeons and theater staff is essential to reduce the time spent performing activities, and this will help improve theater efficiency.

A break-even analysis of major ear surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine variables which affect cost and profit for major ear surgery and perform a break-even analysis.

DESIGN

Retrospective financial analysis.

SETTING

UK teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent major ear surgery under general anaesthesia performed by the senior author in main theatre over a 2-year period between dates of 07 September 2010 and 07 September 2012.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Income, cost and profit for each major ear patient spell. Variables that affect major ear surgery profitability.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients met inclusion criteria. Wide variation in earnings, with a median net loss of £-1345.50 was observed. Income was relatively uniform across all patient spells; however, theatre time of major ear surgery at a cost of £953.24 per hour varied between patients and was the main determinant of cost and profit for the patient spell. Bivariate linear regression of earnings on theatre time identified 94% of variation in earnings was due to variation in theatre time (r = -0.969; P < 0.0001) and derived a break-even time for major ear surgery of 110.6 min. Theatre time was dependent on complexity of procedure and number of OPCS4 procedures performed, with a significant increase in theatre time when three or more procedures were performed during major ear surgery (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

For major ear surgery to either break-even or return a profit, total theatre time should not exceed 110 min and 36 s.

Local heat preconditioning in skin sparing mastectomy: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Experimental data has shown an association with a reduction of flap necrosis after local heat-application to a supraphysiological level resulting from the up-regulation of heat shock proteins, such as HSP-32. The proteins maintained capillary perfusion and increased tissue tolerance to ischaemia. The purpose of this translational study was to evaluate the effect of local heat preconditioning before skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A prospective non-randomised trial was performed from July 2009-April 2010. 50 consecutive patients at risk of skin flap necrosis (BMI >30, sternal-to-nipple distance>26 cm or breast size>C-cup) were included. Twenty-five patients were asked to heat-precondition their breast 24-h prior to surgery using a hot water bottle with a water temperature of 43 °C (thermometers provided), in three 30-min cycles interrupted by spontaneous cooling to room temperature. Skin flap necrosis was defined by the need for surgical debridement. LDI images were taken pre- and post-mastectomy to demonstrate an increase in tissue vascularity.

RESULTS

36% of women (n=25) without local heat-treatment developed skin flap necrosis, 12% developed skin flap necrosis in the treatment group, resulting in a 24% difference (n=25; p=0.047 (95%CI 1%-47%)). LDI scanning of the heated breast demonstrated an increase in vascularity compared to the contralateral non-heated breast. Median length of inpatient stay for treatment group was 4 days (95%CI(4, 7)), controls 8 days (95%CI(8, 9) (p=<0.001)).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggests that in selected cases, local heat preconditioning is a simple and non-invasive method of reducing skin necrosis and length of hospital stay following skin sparing mastectomy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12612001197820.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Implementation of a fast-track-pathway including analgo-sedation with local anaesthesia for outpatient varicose vein surgery: a cohort study

Objective

To evaluate the clinical and economical impact of a fast-track anaesthesia protocol in the management of primary varicose vein (VV) surgery.

Methods

Over a 10-month period (from 1 December 2009 to 30 September 2011), all patients eligible for open VV surgery ( N = 176) were enrolled in a fast-track clinical pathway including titrated analgo-sedation combined with local anaesthesia. This fast-track cohort was compared with a historical cohort undergoing similar procedures and receiving general anaesthesia (GA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA) (between 1 December 2009 to 30 September 2011, N = 200). The length of stay in the operating facilities and postoperative recovery areas were reported and hospital costs were estimated. In addition, the occurrence of adverse events and unplanned hospital admission were compared between the two consecutive periods.

Results

Patients characteristics and surgical procedure were not different in the two cohorts. After implementation of the fast-track pathway, the incidence of postoperative adverse events decreased from 41% to 2.3%, with no need for overnight hospital stay (0% versus 7%). The reduction in anaesthesia-controlled time (-47%) and in postoperative recovery time (-61%) were associated with an increased operating capacity (1 extra case per day) and with substantial cost-savings (mean reduction of €312 per case, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Implementation of a fast-track pathway for outpatient VV surgery was successful, safe and efficient. Analgo-sedation combined with infiltrative anaesthesia (instead of GA or SA) contributed to increase the operating capacity and to reduce the workload of nursing personnel.

Financial impact of surgical training on hospital economics: an income analysis of 1184 out-patient clinic consultations

INTRODUCTION

In many countries healthcare commissioning bodies (state or insurance-based) reimburse hospitals for their activity. The costs associated with post-graduate clinical training as part of this are poorly understood. This study quantified the financial revenue generated by surgical trainees in the out-patient clinic setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of surgical out-patient ambulatory care appointments under 6 full-time equivalent Consultants (Attendings) in one hospital over 2 months. Clinic attendance lists were generated from the Patient Access System. Appointments were categorised as: 'new', 'review' or 'procedure' as per the Department of Health Payment by Results (PbR) Outpatient Tariff (Outpatient Treatment Function Code 104; Outpatient Procedure Code OPRSI1).

RESULTS

During the study period 78 clinics offered 1184 appointments; 133 of these were not attended (11.2%). Of those attended 1029 had sufficient detail for analysis (98%). 261 (25.4%) patients were seen by a trainee. Applying PbR reimbursement criteria to these gave a projected annual income of £GBP 218,712 (€EU 266,527; $USD 353,657) generated by 6 surgical trainees (Residents). This is equivalent to approximately £GBP 36,452 (€EU 44,415; $USD 58,943) per trainee annually compared to £GBP 48,732 (€EU 59,378; $USD 78,800) per Consultant. This projected yearly income off-set 95% of the trainee's basic salary.

CONCLUSION

Surgical trainees generated a quarter of the out-patient clinic activity related income in this study, with each trainee producing three-quarters of that generated by a Consultant. This offers considerable commercial value to hospitals. Although this must offset productivity differences and overall running costs, training bodies should ensure hospitals offer an appropriate return. In a competitive market hospitals could be invited to compete for trainees, with preference given to those providing excellence in training.

Incidence and estimated annual cost of emergency laparotomy in England: is there a major funding shortfall?

Significant recent interest has focussed on improving outcomes after emergency laparotomy. This retrospective database analysis estimated the annual incidence and associated inpatient costs of emergency laparotomy in England. Demographic, process and outcome data were collected for all patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Brighton for two calendar years (2009-2010). Cost analysis assumed £16 per minute theatre time, and £282 per day ward bed and £1382 per day critical care bed costs. National incidence was confirmed from Hospital Episode Statistics and Office of National Statistics mid-year population data. In total, 768 patients underwent 850 emergency laparotomies. The incidence of emergency laparotomy was estimated as ∼1:1100 population. Thirty-six percent (276 patients) were admitted for a median (IQR [range]) of 5 (3-11 [1-76]) days of critical care. Postoperative median (IQR [range]) length of stay was 13 (8-24 [1-176]) days. Our estimated annual inpatient cost of emergency laparotomy for Brighton was ∼£5 million, equivalent to ∼£13 000 per patient, and for England, an annual estimated cost of ∼£650 million. However, 'Payment by Results' reimbursement amounted to a mean (SD) hospital income of just £6905 (2639) per patient, a net financial loss of ∼£6100 per patient, equivalent to a reimbursement shortfall nationally of ∼£300 million. We also found that patients > 70 years (46%) had significantly higher 30-day postoperative mortality (18% vs 6%, p < 0.0001), significantly prolonged median (IQR [range]) length of stay (15 (10-26 [1-123]) days vs 12 (7-22 [1-176]) days, p < 0.001) and incurred higher costs (median (IQR [range]) £9667 (6620-15 732 [1920-103 624]) vs £7467 (4975-14 251 [1178-118 060]), p < 0.001). Emergency laparotomy is a common procedure associated with considerable cost, particularly among elderly patients. A National Emergency Laparotomy Database will help provide an evidence base on which to improve clinical outcome and cost efficiency.