Inability of ibuprofen to alter single dose phenytoin disposition

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between antiseizure medications and drugs for comorbid diseases in children with epilepsy

Introduction: Nearly 80% of children with epilepsy have one or more chronic comorbidities that require specific drug treatments in several cases. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiseizure medications (ASMs) and all other drugs (NON-ASMs) used to treat comorbid diseases may have serious consequences.Areas covered: All potential DDIs between 27 ASMs and all NON-ASMs used for oral chronic treatment of those disorders most often comorbid with epilepsy in children were searched for drug compendia. Clinical evidence of the identified DDIs was also searched in the literature. Forty-eight drugs have been identified as potential DDIs with at least one ASM. Most important DDIs are between some ASMs and omeprazole and pantoprazole (drugs for gastrointestinal disorders), ibuprofen and cyclobenzaprine (drugs for musculoskeletal disorders), loratidine, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, montelukast, and theophylline (drugs for respiratory system), levothyroxine, liothyronine and several corticosteroids (systemic hormonal preparations), almotriptan, dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, and several antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics (drugs for nervous diseases). Clinical evidence of the predicted DDIs was found in a minority of cases.Expert opinion: Treatment of children with epilepsy should be decided considering treatment of both seizures and comorbid diseases and aimed at minimizing the risk of DDIs between ASMs and NON-ASMs.

Prediction of plasma protein binding displacement and its implications for quantitative assessment of metabolic drug-drug interactions from in vitro data

Although displacement from plasma protein binding (dPB) is usually of little clinical significance, it should be taken into account when interpreting changes in total plasma concentrations of drugs subject to metabolically based drug-drug interactions (mDDI). The aim of this study was to develop an approach to predict changes in the free fractions (fu) of pairs of drugs that compete for plasma binding, knowing their binding affinity constants, and to consider the implications of associated concentration- and time-dependence of such changes with respect to drug exposure. Experimental fu values of valproic acid and phenytoin in the presence of ibuprofen, diflunisal, or naproxen were predicted successfully (within 0.99- to 1.36-fold) by the model. In addition, the simulation of time-dependent changes in fu of valproic acid following administration of ibuprofen indicated different extents of dPB during 'first-pass' through the liver after oral absorption and on systemic recirculation. To understand the impact of the time-dependent change in fu, a full physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, that accounts for concentration-time profile of displacee and displacer and their mutual effect on each other, is required. The approach developed in this study is a first step towards the development of such a model.

Disposition, elimination, and bioavailability of phenytoin and its major metabolite in horses

OBJECTIVE

To determine pharmacokinetics and excretion of phenytoin in horses.

ANIMALS

6 adult horses.

PROCEDURE

Using a crossover design, phenytoin was administered (8.8 mg/kg of body weight, IV and PO) to 6 horses to determine bioavailability (F). Phenytoin also was administered orally twice daily for 5 days to those same 6 horses to determine steady-state concentrations and excretion patterns. Blood and urine samples were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- SD) elimination half-life following a single IV or PO administration was 12.6+/-2.8 and 13.9+/-6.3 hours, respectively, and was 11.2+/-4.0 hours following twice-daily administration for 5 days. Values for F ranged from 14.5 to 84.7%. Mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) following single oral administration was 1.8+/-0.68 microg/ml. Steady-state plasma concentrations following twice-daily administration for 5 days was 4.0+/-1.8 microg/ml. Of the 12.0+/-5.4% of the drug excreted during the 36-hour collection period, 0.78+/-0.39% was the parent drug phenytoin, and 11.2+/-5.3% was 5-(phydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (p-HPPH). Following twice-daily administration for 5 days, phenytoin was quantified in plasma and urine for up to 72 and 96 hours, respectively, and p-HPPH was quantified in urine for up to 144 hours after administration. This excretion pattern was not consistent in all horses.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Variability in F, terminal elimination-phase half-life, and Cmax following single or multiple oral administration of phenytoin was considerable. This variability makes it difficult to predict plasma concentrations in horses after phenytoin administration.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen. The first 30 years

Ibuprofen is a chiral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the 2 arylpropionic acid (2-APA) class. A common structural feature of 2-APANSAIDs is a sp3-hybridised tetrahedral chiral carbon atom within the propionic acid side chain moiety with the S-(+)-enantiomer possessing most of the beneficial anti-inflammatory activity. Ibuprofen demonstrates marked stereoselectivity in its pharmacokinetics. Substantial unidirectional inversion of the R-(-) to the S-(+) enantiomer occurs and thus, data generated using nonstereospecific assays may not be extrapolated to explain the disposition of the individual enantiomers. The absorption of ibuprofen is rapid and complete when given orally. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of ibuprofen is dose-dependent. Ibuprofen binds extensively, in a concentration-dependent manner, to plasma albumin. At doses greater than 600mg there is an increase in the unbound fraction of the drug, leading to an increased clearance of ibuprofen and a reduced AUC of the total drug. Substantial concentrations of ibuprofen are attained in synovial fluid, which is a proposed site of action for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ibuprofen is eliminated following biotransformation to glucuronide conjugate metabolites that are excreted in urine, with little of the drug being eliminated unchanged. The excretion of conjugates may be tied to renal function and the accumulation of conjugates occurs in end-stage renal disease. Hepatic disease and cystic fibrosis can alter the disposition kinetics of ibuprofen. Ibuprofen is not excreted in substantial concentrations into breast milk. Significant drug interactions have been demonstrated for aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), cholestyramine and methotrexate. A relationship between ibuprofen plasma concentrations and analgesic and antipyretic effects has been elucidated.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interaction between bromfenac and phenytoin in healthy males

An open-label, nonrandomized, multiple-dose, inpatient study was conducted in healthy male volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetics of bromfenac and phenytoin when the drugs are given individually and concomitantly. Twelve men received multiple oral doses of bromfenac for 4 days and then oral phenytoin for up to 14 days followed by concomitant administration of bromfenac and phenytoin for 8 days. Concomitant administration of the two drugs caused an approximate 40% decrease in the mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the interdose area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of bromfenac. The oral clearance (Clpo) of bromfenac doubled and the volume of distribution increased by 77%. For phenytoin, the mean peak serum concentration and the AUC increased by 9% and 11%, respectively, in the presence of bromfenac. The only change in unbound phenytoin was a 16% increase in the AUC. Although statistically significant, the changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of phenytoin and unbound phenytoin were small. Adjustments in the dose of phenytoin should not be required during concomitant administration of bromfenac, although each patient's clinical status should be evaluated individually.

In vitro displacement of phenytoin from protein binding by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs tolmetin, ibuprofen, and naproxen in normal and uremic sera

Displacement of phenytoin (90% bound to albumin) by other highly albumin-bound drugs like salicylate has been well documented. Other widely used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs like tolmetin, ibuprofen, and naproxen are also strongly bound to albumin and can potentially displace phenytoin. However, phenytoin-ibuprofen interaction has been poorly studied in the past, and interaction of phenytoin with tolmetin or naproxen has not been studied before. For normal serum pool (albumin 3.7 g/dl), we observed significant increases in free phenytoin concentrations only with antiinflammatory drug concentrations at the upper end of therapeutic or above therapeutic concentrations. However, for the uremic pool (albumin 2.9 g/dl), displacement of phenytoin was significant even at the lower end of therapeutic concentrations of those antiinflammatory drugs. Of the three antiinflammatory drugs we studied, ibuprofen caused the highest displacement of phenytoin.

Adverse drug interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Recognition, management and avoidance

The prevalence and incidence of adverse drug interactions involving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remains unknown. To identify those proposed drug interactions of greatest clinical significance, it is appropriate to focus on interactions between commonly used and/or commonly coprescribed drugs, interactions for which there are numerous well documented case reports in reputable journals, interactions validated by well designed in vivo human studies and those affecting high-risk drugs and/or high-risk patients. While most interactions between NSAIDs and other drugs are pharmacokinetic, NSAID-related pharmacodynamic interactions may be considerably more important in the clinical context, and prescriber ignorance is likely to be a major determinant of many adverse drug interactions. Prescribing NSAIDs is relatively contraindicated for patients on oral anticoagulants due to the risk of haemorrhage, and for patients taking high-dose methotrexate due to the dangers of bone marrow toxicity, renal failure and hepatic dysfunction. Combination NSAID therapy cannot be justified as toxicity may be increased without any improvement in efficacy. Where lithium or anti-hypertensives are coprescribed with NSAIDs, close monitoring is mandatory for lithium toxicity and hypertension, respectively, and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or sulindac are preferred. Phenytoin or oral hypoglycaemic agents may be administered with NSAIDs other than pyrazoles and salicylates provided that patients are monitored carefully at the initiation and cessation of NSAID treatment. Digoxin, aminoglycosides and probenecid may be coprescribed with NSAIDs, but close monitoring is required, particularly for high-risk patients such as the elderly. Indomethacin and triamterene should be avoided due to the risk of renal failure. High dose aspirin should be replaced by naproxen in patients on valproic acid (sodium valproate) and care is required when corticosteroids are administered to patients taking salicylates long term in high dosage. Interactions between NSAIDs and antacids or cholestyramine are generally avoidable. Adverse drug interactions involving NSAIDs may be limited by rational prescribing and by careful monitoring, particularly for high-risk patients, drugs and therapy periods.

The problems and pitfalls of NSAID therapy in the elderly (Part II)

The elderly are most susceptible to pharmacokinetic drug interactions between various NSAIDs and anticoagulants, sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents, certain anticonvulsants, methotrexate, digoxin, aminoglycosides and lithium. Pharmacodynamic interactions between some NSAIDs and antihypertensive drugs, anticoagulants, sulphonylurea agents and other NSAIDs are also potentially significant in the elderly. Despite the finding that mean therapeutic responses of large groups of patients have been generally equivalent for the wide range of NSAIDs studied thus far, it is also apparent that marked variability exists in the response of individual patients to different NSAIDs. Subsequent dosage increments may predispose 'nonresponders' and some less sensitive 'responders' to toxicity from NSAIDs. This interindividual variability in response to NSAIDs may be contributed to by the differing physicochemical properties of NSAIDs, physician prescribing habits and patient expectations, variations in NSAID pharmacokinetics, and the differing effects of NSAIDs other than their common ability to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. The principles for drug prescribing in the elderly are no different from those that should be applied to the prescribing of medication in any patient. The clinician should strive to make a diagnosis and should avoid treating symptoms in isolation. Critical assessment of the indication for prescribing NSAID therapy must include consideration of the available effective and safe alternatives. If an NSAID is commenced the lowest effective dose should be the desired goal, but after an appropriate trial it is acceptable clinical practice to employ an alternative NSAID. There is no justification for combination NSAID therapy. The progress of each patient must be carefully monitored, particularly during the first few months of treatment, while periodic review of the ongoing need for the NSAID is essential.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used drugs. Drug interactions with this class of compounds are frequently reported and can be pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic in nature. The pharmacokinetic interactions can be divided into 3 classes: (1) drugs affecting the pharmacokinetics of an NSAID. (2) an NSAID interfering with the pharmacokinetics of another NSAID and (3) NSAIDs altering the pharmacokinetics of another drug. Although the pharmacokinetics of some NSAIDs may be significantly affected by the concurrent administration of certain other drugs (including other NSAIDs), this type of interaction only occasionally leads to serious complications. Concurrent administration of antacids or sucralfate may delay the rate of oral absorption of NSAIDs but generally has little effect on the extent. Use of antacids increases urinary pH, leading to increased renal excretion of unchanged salicylic acid and decreased plasma concentrations of this antirheumatic agent. The H2-receptor blocking agent cimetidine inhibits the oxidative metabolism of many concurrently administered drugs, including certain NSAIDs. Probenecid inhibits the renal secretion of drug glucuronides and this will lead to accumulation in plasma of those NSAIDs eliminated primarily by the formation of labile acyl glucuronides such as naproxen, ketoprofen, indomethacin, carprofen. Cholestyramine decreases the oral absorption of many concurrently administered drugs, including NSAIDs. It may also decrease plasma concentrations of those NSAIDs undergoing enterohepatic circulation (e.g. piroxicam, tenoxicam) by interrupting the enterohepatic cycle. Corticosteroids stimulate the clearance of salicylic acid, leading to low plasma salicylate concentrations. Plasma concentrations of many NSAIDs are significantly reduced when the NSAID is coadministered with aspirin. The clinical relevance of most of these interactions is not well established. However, in those cases where the interaction results in elevated plasma concentrations of the NSAID, special caution should be exercised to avoid excessive accumulation of the NSAID especially in elderly and/or very sick patients who may be more sensitive to the more serious gastroduodenal and renal side-effects of these agents. By virtue of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, NSAIDs may significantly affect the disposition kinetics of a number of other drugs. They can displace other drugs from their plasma protein binding sites, inhibit their metabolism or interfere with their renal excretion. If the affected drug has a narrow therapeutic index, the interaction may be clinically significant. The pyrazole NSAIDs (phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, azapropazone) inhibit the metabolism of many drugs such as the coumarin anticoagulants, oral antidiabetics and anticonvulsants such as phenytoin. Salicylates displace oral anticoagulants from their plasma protein binding sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Interactions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

As NSAIDs are commonly used in patients receiving concomitant drug therapy, there is a risk of clinically significant drug interactions. Important interactions with NSAIDs involve one or both of two major mechanisms: pharmacokinetic (e.g. lithium, phenytoin and barbiturates) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. antihypertensive agents, diuretics). Prescription of a NSAID should be preceded by a careful evaluation of any coexisting pathology (such as renal dysfunction or hypertension) or concurrent drug therapy (such as anticonvulsant or anticoagulant agents) which may predispose a patient to the development of an interaction with potentially severe effects.