A pharmacokinetic study of cilazapril in elderly and young volunteers

Simultaneously Predicting the Pharmacokinetics of CES1-Metabolized Drugs and Their Metabolites Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model in Cirrhosis Subjects

Hepatic carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) metabolizes numerous prodrugs into active ingredients or direct-acting drugs into inactive metabolites. We aimed to develop a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (semi-PBPK) model to simultaneously predict the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their active metabolites in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. Six prodrugs (enalapril, benazepril, cilazapril, temocapril, perindopril and oseltamivir) and three direct-acting drugs (flumazenil, pethidine and remimazolam) were selected. Parameters such as organ blood flows, plasma-binding protein concentrations, functional liver volume, hepatic enzymatic activity, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and gastrointestinal transit rate were integrated into the simulation. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs and their active metabolites were simulated for 1000 virtual individuals. The developed semi-PBPK model, after validation in healthy individuals, was extrapolated to LC patients. Most of the observations fell within the 5th and 95th percentiles of simulations from 1000 virtual patients. The estimated AUC and Cmax were within 0.5-2-fold of the observed values. The sensitivity analysis showed that the decreased plasma exposure of active metabolites due to the decreased CES1 was partly attenuated by the decreased GFR. Conclusion: The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their metabolites in healthy individuals and LC patients, facilitating tailored dosing of CES1 substrates in LC patients.

Impact of Disease States on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) in elderly patients and patients with renal and hepatic impairment were examined, and a role for an AUC/EC50 ratio to guide dosing was evaluated. A Medline and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts search was used to identify human studies and abstracts. Relevant data were evaluated and summarized. Dosing regimens were compared using an AUC/EC50 ratio. Most studies evaluating ACE inhibitors in renal impairment report a strong linear correlation between creatine clearance and drug elimination. AUC and EC50 values for these drugs in elderly subjects appear similar to younger and hypertensive patients. There is increased AUC in some patients with hepatic impairment. Pharmacodynamic data are conflicting. Prolonged ACE inhibition is evident in renal impairment but not necessarily other disease states. ACE inhibitor dosing for hypertension is reasonable based on pharmacokinetics and EC50 values. Further individualization of therapy may improve outcomes, and using the threshold AUC/EC50 ratio may help guide appropriate dosing.

Pharmacodynamics in older adults: a review

BACKGROUND

Older individuals experience physiologic changes in organ function related to aging or to specific disease processes. These changes can affect drug pharmacodynamics in older adults.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article was to review age-related changes in pharmacodynamics and their clinical relevance.

METHODS

PubMed and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched (January 1980-June 2006) for the following combination of terms: pharmacodynamic and elderly, geriatric or aged. References cited in other reviews were also evaluated. The current review focused on age-related pharmacodynamic changes in agents affecting the central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular, and endocrine functions.

RESULTS

Older adults frequently demonstrate an exaggerated response to CNS-active drugs. This is in part due to an underlying age-related decline in CNS function and in part due to increased pharmacodynamic sensitivity for some benzodiazepines, anesthetics, and opioids. The most important pharmacodynamic differences with age for cardiovascular agents are the decrease in effect for beta-adrenergic agents. This decline in response in vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary tissue may be due to a decrease in Gs protein interactions. Most studies indicate there is no decrease in cx-receptor sensitivity with age. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors do not show age-related differences in elderly patients. With the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, there was a slight increase in effect for older adults, but this was only for treatment-naive patients and was transient. Nondihydropyridines did not show an age- associated change in pharmacodynamic effect; however, in the elderly, there appeared to be a decrease in the PR interval prolongation normally seen with these agents. Studies of diuretics indicated that the changes in diuretic and natriuretic effects seen in the elderly were associated with pharmacokinetic changes and were not pharmacodynamic in nature. There was a lack of consistent evidence regarding whether sulfonylureas show age-related changes in pharmacodynamic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a general trend of greater pharmacodynamic sensitivity in the elderly; however, this is not universal, and these age-related changes must be investigated agent-by-agent until further research yields greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the aging process.

Single dose and steady state pharmacokinetics of temocapril and temocaprilat in young and elderly hypertensive patients

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the potential impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of temocapril and its pharmacologically active diacid metabolite, temocaprilat, in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Male and female patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (DBP 95-114 mmHg inclusive) were allocated to two age groups: young, < or = 40 years; elderly, > or = 69 years, (n = 18 per group). In Part I of the study, subjects took a single oral tablet dose of 20 mg temocapril hydrochloride following an overnight fast. In Part II they took seven once daily oral tablet doses of 20 mg temocapril hydrochloride. Pharmacokinetic profiles were determined after the single and the last dose. Trough plasma samples were taken before each dose in Part II. Urine was collected for 24 h following the single and the last dose.

RESULTS

Steady state was reached within 1 week in both groups. Statistically significant differences were detected in AUC and AUCss for temocaprilat as well as in CL(R) for temocapril and temocaprilat, respectively, after a single dose and at steady state. All other pharmacokinetic parameters for temocapril and temocaprilat did not show any significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic differences detected in the elderly do not require a dose adjustment per se. Nonetheless, a lower starting dose may be appropriate as elderly hypertensive patients are usually considered to be at an increased risk of first dose hypotension at the onset of treatment with an ACE inhibitor.

Optimal dosage of ACE inhibitors in older patients

Despite having lower levels of plasma renin activity than younger individuals, elderly patients with hypertension respond well to ACE inhibitors and the drugs have few adverse effects. Plasma concentrations of the active ACE inhibitor are generally higher in the elderly because of decreased renal clearance. These altered pharmacokinetics, combined with impairment of cardiovascular reflexes and the increasing prevalence of heart failure and renal impairment with age, render elderly patients more susceptible to first-dose hypotension. Although many studies have shown that standard dosages are well tolerated it is safer to use lower initial dosages of ACE inhibitors in elderly hypertensive patients because hypotensive reactions are not always predictable. The maintenance dosage may be determined more by the presence of renal disease or heart failure than by age per se. In elderly patients with heart failure, ACE inhibitors should be introduced even more cautiously, using low dosages and preferably under supervision. It may also be necessary to interrupt diuretic treatment for a few days to prevent severe hypotension. The ACE inhibitor dosage should then be titrated up to the maximum that is well tolerated, as this appears to offer the greatest benefit.

ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension

High blood pressure (BP) in the elderly must not be ignored as a normal consequence of aging. The criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension and the necessity to treat it are the same in elderly and younger patients. The aim of treatment of elderly hypertensive patients is to decrease BP safely and to reduce risk factors associated with cerebrovascular, cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. The treatment of elderly hypertensive patients should be adjusted according to the needs of the individual, based upon age, race, severity of hypertension, co-existing medical problems, other cardiovascular risk factors, target-organ damage, risk-benefit considerations and costs. In addition to the elevated BP, other cardiovascular risk factors include smoking, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypercreatininaemia, peripheral vascular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and microalbuminuria (or albuminuria). Thus, the choice of initial antihypertensive therapy in elderly hypertensive patients should be based not only on the expected response, but also on the effects of therapy on lipid, potassium, glucose and uric acid levels, and left ventricular anatomy and function. Co-existing medical conditions (such as asthma, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, renal failure, gout, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidaemia and peripheral vascular disease) are major determinants for the selection of antihypertensive medications. With previous therapies (diuretics, beta-blockers, etc.), good BP control in the elderly was associated with clear and statistically significant reductions in stroke-related morbidity and mortality, but the overall effects on cardiovascular and renal complications of hypertension was either more variable or less obvious. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are not only efficacious antihypertensive agents in the elderly, but also appear promising in counteracting some of the cardiovascular and renal consequences of hypertension. They are well tolerated and have a relatively low incidence of adverse effects. ACE inhibitors possess ancillary characteristics that are potentially beneficial for many elderly patients, including reduction of left ventricular mass, lack of metabolic and lipid disturbances, no adverse CNS effects, no risk of induction of heart failure, and a low risk of orthostatic hypotension. Since ACE inhibitors may improve perfusion to the heart, kidney and brain, they are well worth considering for the treatment of elderly patients with hypertensive target organ damage, especially in patients with heart failure, and diabetic patients with early nephropathy.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibition in cirrhosis. Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the ACE-inhibitor cilazapril (Ro 31-2848)

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor, cilazapril, is converted to its active metabolite, cilazaprilat, by ester hydrolysis in the liver. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 1 mg oral dose of cilazapril were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers and in 9 cirrhotic patients with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension. A significantly increased mean plasma peak concentration (40.0 +/- 13.6 ng/ml vs. 25.5 +/- 7.9 ng/ml; p < 0.05) and a decreased apparent oral clearance (7.8 +/- 6.0 l/h vs. 16.4 +/- 5.4 l/h; p < 0.05) of cilazapril were found in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy volunteers. The plasma concentration of cilazaprilat declined in 2 phases. In both phases the plasma half-life was significantly longer in patients with cirrhosis (1st phase: 2.5 +/- 0.8 h vs. 1.7 +/- 0.6 h; p < 0.05; 2nd phase: 46.2 +/- 16.6 h vs. 28.8 +/- 4.7 h; p < 0.001). Consequently, cilazaprilat concentrations at 24 h were higher in patients than in volunteers (1.42 +/- 0.33 ng/ml vs. 0.87 +/- 0.14 ng/ml; p < 0.001). The predose activity of the ACE (26.3 +/- 7.3 U/l vs. 16.8 +/- 4.5 U/l; p < 0.005) and plasma renin activity (3.3 +/- 3.2 ng/ml/h vs. 1.4 +/- 1.0 ng/ml/h) were higher in patients than in volunteers. Maximum ACE-inhibition occurred at similar times in patients (2.7 h) and volunteers (2.3 h). Maximum ACE-inhibition was slightly higher in volunteers (94.6%) than in patients (90.6%). At later time points (> 24 h), however, ACE-inhibition was more pronounced in patients (at 72 h: 39.6 +/- 6.9% vs. 23.5 +/- 8.2%; p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Physiological changes due to age. Implications for cardiovascular drug therapy

Cardiovascular disease is the single largest cause of death in the elderly. Many of the published studies concerning the physiology and pharmacology of the aging cardiovascular system are seriously flawed. Problems include failure to measure the drug bioavailability and the selection of subjects with overt or subclinical disease. With exercise, the rise in heart rate is inversely proportional to age and maximum heart rate is reduced. Baroreceptor reflex activity appears to decline with age. Cardiac output is maintained in the elderly, with a slower heart rate and a greater stroke volume than in the young. Plasma noradrenaline (norepinephrine) levels increase in the elderly but there is no change in the sensitivity of the vasoconstrictor alpha 1-adrenoceptor. There is evidence for a decline in the activity of the vasodilator beta 2-adrenoceptor with age. It is difficult to make general rules about the effect of aging on the disposition and elimination of drugs. Each drug must be tested separately.

Cilazapril. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cardiovascular disease

Cilazapril is an orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which lowers peripheral vascular resistance without affecting heart rate. Like enalapril and ramipril it is a prodrug, and is hydrolysed after absorption to cilazaprilat, which has a long terminal phase elimination half-life permitting once daily administration. Given once daily at doses between 2.5 and 5 mg, cilazapril reduces arterial blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential and renal hypertension. Patients who do not respond adequately to cilazapril monotherapy usually respond with the addition of a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide. Preliminary data suggest that cilazapril is of comparable antihypertensive efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of hydrochlorothiazide, slow release propranolol, nitrendipine, captopril and enalapril. In small studies cilazapril has produced sustained beneficial haemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure. Cilazapril has been well tolerated and exhibits tolerability typical of ACE inhibitors as a class, including their lack of detrimental effect on glucose or lipid metabolism. Cilazapril should provide an effective alternative in the treatment of hypertension and, if preliminary data are confirmed, in congestive heart failure.

Antihypertensive therapy in the aged patient. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations

The incidence of both systolic and diastolic hypertension is increased in elderly patients, therefore antihypertensive drugs are commonly used in this population. In addition to changes in blood pressure, the aging process also causes numerous changes in other physiological parameters, resulting in altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to the drugs. The dosage regimens for thiazide diuretics and amiloride must be individually titrated in the elderly patient, since the elimination of these agents decreases concurrently with decreased renal function, as indicated by compromised creatinine clearance. The initial doses of the calcium antagonists should be decreased in elderly patients, since representative compounds from all 3 chemically heterogeneous classes have been shown to have decreased clearance in these patients which appears to be primarily due to the status of hepatic function in the patient. However, with verapamil, the dosage should be further decreased in association with compromised renal function. The dosage of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be adjusted according to renal function rather than age. Lisinopril, which is primarily eliminated unchanged, is usually given in lower doses in the elderly, and doses of both captopril and enalapril may need to be reduced, depending on renal function. While there is no need to adjust the dosage regimen for the alpha-adrenoceptor blocking drugs (prazosin, terazosin), caution should be used with the beta-adrenergic blockers, particularly the hydrophilic agents, since they are renally eliminated. Labetalol may be a suitable alternative beta-blocker for the elderly patient, since its pharmacodynamic properties of decreased systemic vascular resistance without changes in heart rate or stroke volume are preferential for the elderly patient, and its pharmacokinetics are relatively unchanged in this population. Drugs that act primarily through the central nervous system, such as clonidine, methyldopa and guanfacine, require smaller doses in the presence of renal dysfunction. In contrast, guanabenz is metabolised primarily by the liver, so it would appear to be useful in elderly patients with renal dysfunction despite the lack of studies in this population. Guanadrel, an adrenergic neuron blocking drug, also requires a dosage reduction in patients with impaired renal function. In addition to the pharmacokinetic changes that occur in the elderly patient, pharmacodynamic changes may also be anticipated due to receptor modifications. Older patients have a decrease in beta-receptor sensitivity, while alpha-receptor sensitivity does not change. When designing the dosage regimen for a senior patient with hypertension, the combination of all these variables must be considered.

Clinical pharmacology of cilazapril

In clinical pharmacology studies, cilazapril, after its bioactivation to cilazaprilat, was characterised as a potent, reversible angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with a terminal half-life of 30 to 50 hours, which is consistent with saturable binding to ACE. Despite the arterial vasodilatation, only slight increases in heart rate occurred during cilazapril administration. Cilazapril had no acute effect on cardiovascular reflexes, and increased effective renal plasma flow slightly. Glomerular filtration rate remained unaltered. A close positive correlation was found between the cilazaprilat plasma concentration and degree of ACE inhibition. The potency of cilazaprit, defined as the concentration of cilazaprilat causing 50% inhibition of ACE, was approximately 1 microgram/L plasma. In short term studies in patients with hypertension, it appeared that more than 90% inhibition of plasma ACE was needed to obtain blood pressure reduction. Results of various dose-response studies established the indirect relationship between dose, the plasma concentration of the drug, and the blood pressure response, and identified the dose producing the maximal effect to be 5mg. Cilazapril inhibited ACE for a relatively long period which was extended in patients with severe chronic renal impairment or hepatic failure. In these patients a reduction of the dose and/or less frequent administration is recommended. There was no clinically relevant interaction of cilazapril with food, furosemide (frusemide), digoxin or coumarins. The effects of hydrochlorothiazide on sodium and chloride excretion were potentiated by cilazapril, and an additive effect of propranolol and nitrendipine on the blood pressure response to cilazapril was observed. An interaction with indomethacin and cilazapril might occur, potentially reducing the blood pressure-lowering effect of cilazapril. In general, cilazapril was well tolerated.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer ACE inhibitors. A review

The orally active angiotensin-converting inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) such as captopril and enalapril represent a significant therapeutic advance in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril differs from captopril in several respects. It is a prodrug converted by hepatic esterolysis to the active (but more poorly absorbed) diacid, enalaprilat. Enalaprilat is more potent than captopril, more slowly eliminated and does not possess a sulfhydryl (SH) group. Enalapril was rapidly followed by a number of newer ACE inhibitors, the majority of which are similar to enalapril in that they are prodrugs, converted by hepatic esterolysis to a major active but poorly absorbed diacid metabolite. In one case (delapril) there are 2 active metabolites; in another (alacepril) the prodrug is converted in vivo to captopril. Lisinopril is an exception in that it is an enalaprilat-like diacid but with acceptable oral bioavailability, so that the prodrug route is not employed. The newer ACE inhibitors are at widely different stages of development, and it is not yet clear how many will reach regular clinical use. Of these newer drugs, lisinopril is the longest established and is the subject of the widest published literature. For a number there is as yet little published pharmacokinetic information. A variety of assay methods have been employed to characterise the pharmacokinetics of the ACE inhibitors, including enzymatic techniques, radioimmunoassay and chromatography. The peak plasma concentrations of the prodrugs are generally observed at around 1 hour and those of the diacid metabolites at about 2 to 4 hours. However, there is considerable variation within and between drugs, with benazepril and benazeprilat reaching peak concentrations early and enalapril and enalaprilat typical of later times to peak. Absorption of the active diacids is generally poor, and moderate (typically 30 to 70%) for the prodrugs. The bioavailability of lisinopril is about 25%. It is difficult to talk meaningfully about half-lives of the active drugs. The declines in their plasma concentrations are polyphasic and, if analytical sensitivity allows, active drug may be found at 48 hours or more following administration. This may reflect binding to ACE in plasma. Half-lives of accumulation are of the order of 12 hours; protein binding varies from little (lisinopril) to 90% (benazeprilat). Elimination is mostly renal but there may be biliary elimination for some, such as benazeprilat and fosinopril. The half-lives of the prodrugs are short. Impaired renal function decreases the elimination rate of the diacids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A pharmacokinetic study of cilazapril in patients with congestive heart failure

1. The pharmacokinetics of cilazapril and the inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) were investigated in 10 patients with congestive heart failure, NYHA class II-III, receiving diuretics with or without digoxin. 2. Patients received 0.5 mg and 1 mg cilazapril on the first 2 days, followed by 0.5 mg or 1 mg daily for the next 8 weeks, in a single-blind study. Plasma cilazaprilat concentrations and plasma ACE activities were measured by radioenzymatic methods up to 24 h after the first and last doses. 3. After the initial 0.5 mg dose of cilazapril, a mean maximum plasma concentration of cilazaprilat of 6.8 ng ml-1 was observed at 2.3 h. Concentrations declined up to 8 h with a mean half-life of 5.8 h, followed by slower decrease to 24 h. Total clearance, based on data to 24 h, was estimated at 8.5 l h-1, with three-fold inter-individual variation. Mean maximum plasma ACE inhibition was 87%, decreasing to 65% at 24 h. 4. In the multiple dose phase of the study, four patients received cilazapril 0.5 mg daily, and six patients 1 mg daily. Cilazapril accumulation for the 0.5 mg group averaged 77%, but steady state concentrations for the 1 mg group were less than double those of the 0.5 mg group. ACE inhibition profiles at steady state were similar for both groups, and they differed from first dose data only in a somewhat lower inhibition at 24 h. 5. Historical comparison of the first-dose data with those for healthy young volunteers at identical dosage revealed only minor differences in kinetic parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)