Lisinopril dose-response relationship in essential hypertension

Once-Daily Low Inflammatory Foods Everyday (LIFE) Smoothie or the Full LIFE Diet Lowers C-Reactive Protein and Raises Plasma Beta-Carotene in 7 Days

Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, is associated with increased risk for numerous inflammation-driven chronic diseases. A prior longitudinal study showed that the Low Inflammatory Foods Everyday (LIFE) diet, which is rich in dark green leafy vegetables (DGLV), lowered CRP over a mean follow-up period of 6 months. In this retrospective study, we investigate whether patients who consume the LIFE diet or their regular diet plus one component of the LIFE diet (LIFE smoothie), experience reductions in high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) in 7 days. Sixteen patients in a community practice met inclusion criteria. Patient compliance was assessed by patient interviews and measurements of beta-carotene, which is abundant in DGLV. Following the interventions, CRP decreased in both the LIFE diet (−0.47 mg/L, P = .02) and smoothie groups (−1.2 mg/L, P = .04). No statistically significant difference in reduction was observed between groups ( P = .18). Plasma beta-carotene increased in both groups (+23.2, P = .02; +20.6, P = .006, respectively). These findings suggest that the LIFE diet or a regular American diet supplemented with the LIFE smoothie may quickly reduce systemic inflammation and the risk of many chronic diseases.

Randomized Dose-Response Study of the New Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Aprocitentan in Hypertension

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

This study examined the dose-response characteristics of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin A/endothelin B receptor antagonist, in patients with essential hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, parallel study design, eligible patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 90–109 mm Hg received aprocitentan 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg, placebo, or lisinopril 20 mg as a positive control once daily for 8 weeks. Multiple automated office BP readings were obtained with patients resting unattended (unattended automated office BP) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8. Ambulatory BP was monitored for 24 hours at baseline and week 8. After a single-blind placebo run-in period, 490 eligible patients were randomized to the double-blind phase, with 409 patients completing 8 weeks of therapy per protocol. Aprocitentan 10, 25, and 50 mg decreased sitting systolic/diastolic unattended automated office BP from baseline to week 8 (placebo-corrected decreases: 7.05/4.93, 9.90/6.99, and 7.58/4.95 mm Hg, respectively, P≤0.014 versus placebo), compared with an unattended automated office BP reduction of 4.84/3.81 mm Hg with lisinopril 20 mg. For patients with valid ambulatory BP, aprocitentan 10, 25, and 50 mg significantly decreased placebo-corrected 24-hour BP by 3.99/4.04, 4.83/5.89, and 3.67/4.45 mm Hg, respectively. Incidence of adverse events was similar in the aprocitentan groups (22.0%–40.2%) and the placebo group (36.6%). Aprocitentan produced dose-dependent decreases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, albumin, and uric acid, an increase in estimated plasma volume, but no change in weight versus placebo. These findings support further investigation of aprocitentan at doses of 10 to 25 mg in hypertension.

Fast parameters estimation in medication efficacy assessment model for heart failure treatment

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a common and potentially fatal condition. Cardiovascular research has focused on medical therapy for HF. Theoretical modelling could enable simulation and evaluation of the effectiveness of medications. Furthermore, the models could also help predict patients' cardiac response to the treatment which will be valuable for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This study presents a fast parameters estimation algorithm for constructing a cardiovascular model for medicine evaluation. The outcome of HF treatment is assessed by hemodynamic parameters and a comprehensive index furnished by the model. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were used as a model drug in this study.

RESULTS

Our simulation results showed different treatment responses to enalapril and lisinopril, which are both ACEI drugs. A dose-effect was also observed in the model simulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results agreed well with the findings from clinical trials and previous literature, suggesting the validity of the model.

Blood pressure control in patients receiving bevacizumab in an outpatient cancer center

Purpose. Hypertension is a common adverse effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling inhibitors, such as bevacizumab, with an incidence upwards of 35%. The management of bevacizumab-induced hypertension is important in order to avoid dose interruption/discontinuation and/or end organ damage. The efficacy of antihypertensive medications for this cause of hypertension has not been demonstrated. This study seeks to determine if antihypertensives are effective in treating anti-VEGF-induced hypertension from bevacizumab and determine which classes of antihypertensive agents are effective.

Methods. A retrospective review of all patients who received bevacizumab between January 2007 and September 2009 at two medical centers was conducted. Patients were included if they experienced new onset or exacerbation of preexisting hypertension, during bevacizumab treatment. Efficacy of antihypertensives was determined by recording a 28-day change in systolic blood pressure from the initiation or dose increase of individual antihypertensive medications. Secondary endpoints included an efficacy analysis of antihypertensive classes.

Results. Five-hundred thirteen patients were identified as receiving bevacizumab during the indicated time period. Fifty-seven patients met the full inclusion/exclusion criteria for analysis. The average systolic blood pressure declined by 23 mm Hg with 4 weeks of treatment ( p < 0.0001). Each class had a statistically significant decline in systolic blood pressure of 15.5–57 mm Hg with the exception of diuretics and a group of miscellaneous antihypertensives.

Conclusions. This is the first data that demonstrates individual classes of antihypertensives are effective in bevacizumab-induced hypertension. Most antihypertensives were effective in reducing blood pressure, with the exception of diuretics and miscellaneous antihypertensives, which may be due to a limited sample size.

Optimal dose of lisinopril for renoprotection in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy: a randomised crossover trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimal renoprotective effect of ultrahigh doses of lisinopril, as reflected by short-term changes in urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

At the Steno Diabetes Center, 49 type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy completed this double-masked randomised crossover trial consisting of an initial washout period followed by three treatment periods each lasting 2 months, where all patients received lisinopril 20, 40 and 60 mg once daily in randomised order in addition to slow-release furosemide. Allocation was concealed by sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. UAER, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and estimated GFR were determined at baseline and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

All 49 patients completed all three treatment periods. Baseline values were: UAER (geometric mean [95% CI]) 362 (240-545) mg/24 h, 24 h ABP (mean [SD]) 142 (14)/74 (8) mmHg and estimated GFR 75 (29) ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2). Reductions in UAER from baseline were 63%, 71% and 70%, respectively, with the increasing doses of lisinopril (p < 0.001). Compared with lisinopril 20 mg there was a further reduction in UAER of 23% with lisinopril 40 mg and 19% with 60 mg, p < 0.05. ABP was reduced from baseline by 10/5, 13/7 and 12/7 mmHg (p < 0.001 vs baseline, p < 0.05 for diastolic ABP 20 vs 40 mg, otherwise NS between doses). The difference in UAER between 20 and 40 mg lisinopril was significant after adjustment for changes in ABP (p < 0.01). Two patients were excluded from the study because of an increase in plasma creatinine and one because of high BP; otherwise the study medication was well tolerated with few, mild, dose-independent adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Lisinopril 40 mg once daily is generally safe and offers additional reductions in BP and UAER in comparison with the currently recommended dose of 20 mg. Lisinopril 60 mg offers no further beneficial effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00118976.

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension

BACKGROUND

ACE inhibitors are widely prescribed for hypertension so it is essential to determine and compare their effects on blood pressure (BP), heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related systolic and/or diastolic BP lowering efficacy of ACE inhibitors versus placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2007), EMBASE (1988 to February 2007) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed-dose monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. WDAE information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety two trials evaluated the dose-related trough BP lowering efficacy of 14 different ACE inhibitors in 12 954 participants with a baseline BP of 157/101 mm Hg. The data do not suggest that any one ACE inhibitor is better or worse at lowering BP. A dose of 1/8 or 1/4 of the manufacturer's maximum recommended daily dose (Max) achieved a BP lowering effect that was 60 to 70% of the BP lowering effect of Max. A dose of 1/2 Max achieved a BP lowering effect that was 90% of Max. ACE inhibitor doses above Max did not significantly lower BP more than Max. Combining the effects of 1/2 Max and higher doses gives an estimate of the average trough BP lowering efficacy for ACE inhibitors as a class of drugs of -8 mm Hg for SBP and -5 mm Hg for DBP. ACE inhibitors reduced BP measured 1 to 12 hours after the dose by about 11/6 mm Hg.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different ACE inhibitors. The BP lowering effect of ACE inhibitors is modest; the magnitude of trough BP lowering at one-half the manufacturers' maximum recommended dose and above is -8/-5 mm Hg. Furthermore, 60 to 70% of this trough BP lowering effect occurs with recommended starting doses. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with ACE inhibitors because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.

Redefining the ACE-inhibitor dose-response relationship: substantial blood pressure lowering after massive doses

OBJECTIVES

The blood pressure-lowering dose-response relationship for angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is assumed to flatten at doses higher than those conventionally used in clinical practice. However, existing clinical trial data do not adequately address the haemodynamic effects of high ACE inhibitor dosages. Therefore, we examined the blood pressure responses in patients presenting to hospital following a deliberate ACE inhibitor overdose.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective case review, and included all patients who presented to our hospital in the past 5 years after an ACE inhibitor overdose. The data collected were heart rate and systemic blood pressure at various times after ingestion and maximum haemodynamic derangement; these were compared to baseline or recovered values.

RESULTS

Data from 33 patients (24 men) were evaluated. The median (inter-quartile range, IQR) age of the patients was 49 years (IQR: 42-56 years). The median stated dose ingested was 140 mg (IQR: 60-280 mg), which is 20x (IQR: 7-42) the defined daily dose. The maximum fall in systolic blood pressure was 50 mmHg (IQR: 40-64 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure was 35 mmHg (IQR: 26-43 mmHg) and mean blood pressure was 39 mmHg (IQR: 30-47 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed reduction in blood pressure following an overdose of an ACE inhibitor was greater than anticipated based on data from therapeutic doses. We conclude that a blood pressure-lowering dose-response relationship extends to higher ACE inhibitor doses than those conventionally used in clinical practice.

Preventing end-stage renal disease in diabetic patients - dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (Part II)

Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of diabetes related morbidity and mortality. The first part of the current review was published in the last issue of this journal and discussed the important role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in diabetic nephropathy and the genetic influence on development of endstage renal disease (ESRD) in diabetic patients. This second part of the review focus on the potential improvement of the current treatment strategy to slow down the loss of kidney function using dual blockade of the RAS with both ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Substantial evidence from short-term studies using surrogate endpoints indicates a beneficial impact of dual blockade of the RAS, not obtainable with single agent blockade alone, both in diabetic and non-diabetic renal disease. This conclusion has been confirmed and extended in a longterm trial with regard to prevention of ESRD in non-diabetic renal disease. Results indicate that dual blockade of the RAS may further slow down, but not arrest progressive loss of renal function. However, studies defining the optimal dose of ACE-I / ARBs without additional adverse effects are essential to ensure relevant comparison with dual blockade therapy. Trials using primary renal endpoints in diabetic nephropathy are still needed, and will finally establish the role of dual blockade of the RAS in a clinical setting.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system versus maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. We tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibitor in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN).

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with 8 weeks treatment with placebo and irbesartan 300 mg (once daily), added on top of enalapril 40 mg (once daily). We included 24 type 1 patients with DN. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-hour blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured.

RESULTS

Values on ACE inhibitors + placebo were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 519 (342 to 789) mg/24 hours; blood pressure [mean (SEM)], 131 (3)/74 (1) mm Hg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 65 (5) mL/min/1.73 m2. Dual blockade of the RAS induced a reduction in albuminuria [mean (95% CI)] of 25% (15, 34) (P < 0.001), a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 8 mm Hg (4, 12) (P = 0.002), and a reduction of 4 mm Hg (2, 7) (P = 0.003) in diastolic blood pressure. GFR and plasma potassium remained unchanged during both treatment regimes. Dual blockade was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Dual blockade of the RAS is superior to maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibitors with regard to lowering of albuminuria and blood pressure in type 1 patients with DN. Long-term trials are needed to further establish the role of dual blockade of the RAS in renal and cardiovascular protection.

Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy

Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. This study tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-I) and an Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to either drug alone in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). A randomized double-blind crossover trial was performed with 8-wk treatment with placebo, 20 mg of benazepril once daily, 80 mg of valsartan once daily, and the combination of 20 mg of benazepril and 80 mg of valsartan. Twenty type I diabetic patients with DN were included. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-h BP, and GFR were measured. Eighteen patients completed the study. Placebo values were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 701 (490 to 1002) mg/24 h; BP [mean (SEM)], 144 (4)/79 (2) mmHg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 82 (7) ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Treatment with benazepril, valsartan, or dual blockade significantly reduced albuminuria and BP compared with placebo. Benazepril and valsartan were equally effective. Dual blockade induced an additional reduction in albuminuria of 43 % (29 to 54 %) compared with any type of monotherapy, and a reduction in systolic BP of 6 (0 to 13) mmHg and 7 (1 to 14) mmHg (versus benazepril and valsartan, respectively) and a reduction of 7 (4 to 10) mmHg diastolic compared with both monotherapies. GFR was reversibly reduced on dual blockade compared with monotherapy and placebo. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, dual blockade of the RAS may offer additional renal and cardiovascular protection in type I diabetic patients with DN.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and selective pharmacodynamics of new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: an update

The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely used in the management of essential hypertension, stable chronic heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI) and diabetic nephropathy. There is an increasing number of new agents to add to the nine ACE inhibitors (benazepril, cilazapril, delapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, pentopril, perindopril, quinapril and ramipril) reviewed in this journal in 1990. The pharmacokinetic properties of five newer ACE inhibitors (trandolapril, moexipril, spirapril, temocapril and imidapril) are reviewed in this update. All of these new agents are characterised by having a carboxyl functional groups and requiring hepatic activation to form pharmacologically active metabolites. They achieve peak plasma concentrations at similar times (t(max)) to those of established agents. Three of these agents (trandolapril, moexipril and imidapril) require dosage reductions in patients with renal impairment. Dosage reductions of moexipril and temocapril are recommended for elderly patients, and dosages of moexipril should be lower in patients who are hepatically impaired. Moexipril should be taken 1 hour before meals, whereas other ACE inhibitors can be taken without regard to meals. The pharmacokinetics of warfarin are not altered by concomitant administration with trandolapril or moexipril. Although imidapril and spirapril have no effect on digoxin pharmacokinetics, the area under the concentration-time curve of imidapril and the peak plasma concentration of the active metabolite imidaprilat are decreased when imidapril is given together with digoxin. Although six ACE inhibitors (captopril, enalapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, quinapril and ramipril) have been approved for use in heart failure by the US Food and Drug Administration, an overview of 32 clinical trials of ACE inhibitors in heart failure showed that no significant heterogeneity in mortality was found among enalapril, ramipril, quinapril, captopril, lisinopril, benazepril, perindopril and cilazapril. Initiation of therapy with captopril, ramipril, and trandolapril at least 3 days after an acute MI resulted in all-cause mortality risk reductions of 18 to 27%. Captopril has been shown to have similar morbidity and mortality benefits to those of diuretics and beta-blockers in hypertensive patients. Captopril has been shown to delay the progression of diabetic nephropathy, and enalapril and lisinopril prevent the development of nephropathy in normoalbuminuric patients with diabetes. ACE inhibitors are generally characterised by flat dose-response curves. Lisinopril is the only ACE inhibitor that exhibits a linear dose-response curve. Despite the fact that most ACE inhibitors are recommended for once-daily administration, only fosinopril, ramipril, and trandolapril have trough-to-peak effect ratios in excess of 50%.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in diabetic nephropathy: a randomized double-blind crossover study

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) have levels of albuminuria > 1 g/day and blood pressure >135/85 mmHg, despite antihypertensive combination therapy, including recommended doses of ACE inhibitors, e.g., lisinopril/enalapril at 20 mg daily. We tested the concept that such patients might benefit from dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a randomized double-blind crossover study of 2 months treatment with candesartan cilexetil 8 mg once daily and placebo in addition to previous antihypertensive treatment. We included 18 type 2 diabetic patients with DN fulfilling the above-mentioned criteria. All received recommended doses of ACE inhibitor and, in addition, 15 patients received diuretics, 11 received a calcium channel antagonist, and 3 received a beta-blocker. At the end of each treatment period, we measured the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 24-h blood pressure, albuminuria, and IgGuria.

RESULTS

The addition of candesartan to usual antihypertensive therapy induced a mean (95% CI) reduction in albuminuria of 25% (2-58), P = 0.036 (geometric mean [95% CI] from 1,764 mg/24 h [1,225-2,540] to 1,334 mg/24 h [890-1,998]). It also produced a mean reduction of 35% (9-53) in the fractional clearance of albumin (P = 0.016), a reduction of 32% (1-54) in fractional clearance of IgG (P = 0.046), a reduction in 24-h systolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg (2-18) (P = 0.019) (mean +/- +/- SE) from 148 +/- 3 to 138 +/- 5 mmHg, and a mean reduction in GFR of 5 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) (0.1-9) (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual blockade of the RAS reduces albuminuria and blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with DN responding insufficiently to previous antihypertensive therapy, including ACE inhibitors in recommended doses.

Once-daily trandolapril compared with the twice-daily formulation in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: assessment by conventional and ambulatory blood pressures

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of the long-acting ACE inhibitor trandolapril 1 mg administered once daily and 0.5 mg twice daily in 31 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After randomization, patients entered a single-blind placebo period of 4 weeks. After a double-blind treatment of 4 weeks with either of the dosage regimens, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen for the last 4 weeks of the study. Conventional BP and heart rate were measured on each visit and ambulatory BP monitoring was done at baseline and at the end of each treatment phase. Conventional as well as 24-hour and awake ambulatory systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) and almost identically decreased by both once- and twice-daily formulations. Moreover, the clinical response rates (reduction in seated diastolic BP > or = 10% or diastolic BP < or = 90 mm Hg) were similar with both treatment regimens (42% vs. 45% with the once- and twice-daily formulations, respectively). However, trandolapril twice daily exerted a significantly (P = 0.03) greater antihypertensive effect on systolic BP during sleep as compared with the once-daily formulation. Due to the fact that the minimal effective dose was used in this trial, further studies with higher doses should demonstrate effective 24-hour control of BP as described with other long-acting ACE inhibitors. In addition, our results suggest that ambulatory BP measurements should be done in dose-response studies.

Fosinopril monotherapy: relationship between blood pressure reduction and time of administration

The time to peak antihypertensive effect and the trough-to-peak ratio were determined in 64 Caucasian patients (19 men, 45 women) with mild to moderate hypertension [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95 to 115 mmHg]. They received placebo or fosinopril 10, 20, or 40 mg once daily for 4 weeks. The study consisted of a 4-week placebo lead-in, 4 weeks' double-blind treatment, and a 1-week placebo washout period. Vital signs were determined biweekly before dosing, and blood pressures were measured every 1 to 2 h during two 27-h periods at the beginning and end of treatment. After the first and last doses of all three regimens, the peak effect on blood pressure occurred 5 to 7 h after all three dosages. Neither peak nor trough blood pressure changes showed a clear dose-response relationship. Trough to peak ratios for the first dose, corrected for placebo effects, were 79% for fosinopril 10 mg, 48% for fosinopril 20 mg, and 74% for fosinopril 40 mg, and the trough-to-peak ratios for the last dose were 41% for fosinopril 10 mg, 32% for fosinopril 20 mg, and 44% for fosinopril 40 mg. In the 38 responders among the 48 patients receiving fosinopril (supine DBP decrease of at least 5 mmHg at 24 h postdose), trough-to-peak ratios ranged from 50 to 81%, and the range indicates that fosinopril is efficacious when administered once daily. Adverse effects were mild to moderate, and no patient discontinued treatment. Changes in the laboratory test results, electrocardiograms, or the results of physical examinations were unremarkable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose-response studies with benazepril in mild to moderate hypertension

The dose-response curve for benazepril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, has been established from a systematic series of controlled clinical studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The studies included a dose-ranging study, four dose-response studies (placebo-controlled or crossover), and four titration trials. The dose-response studies involved 803 patients and evaluated doses from 2 to 80 mg. Analysis of the data revealed the existence of a dose-response relationship over the dosage range of 10 to 80 mg given once daily. Efficacy of once-daily administration was shown by the persistence of significant blood pressure reduction over the 24-h dosing interval. In addition, the net trough-to-peak ratio (an indicator of net antihypertensive effect at the end of the dosing interval) was generally greater than 50%. The dose-determination studies with benazepril were conducted according to a well-designed strategy in which parameters were carefully defined. Based on these trials, the initial dosage for benazepril appears to be 10 mg once daily. Additional response may be observed at dosages up to 80 mg once daily.