Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

The management of Chronic Hand Eczema: A retrospective patient record review

BACKGROUND

Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE) is a heterogeneous fluctuating inflammatory disease that represents a significant burden. Effective treatment options for moderate to severe CHE are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To assess how patients with moderate to severe CHE are treated in clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective, physician-led patient record review assessed the demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics of patients aged ≥18 years with CHE across seven countries. Each participating physician was requested to review records for their three most recent patients with moderate to severe CHE treated with a topical or systemic therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 264 physicians, of whom 88.6% were dermatologists and 70.1% were predominantly or partly hospital-based, reviewed the records of 792 patients. Signs were present on hands only in 56.4% of patients and the mean time on current treatment was 16.7 months. Overall, 62.9% of patients received systemic therapy and almost one-quarter (23.4%) were treated with a biologic; 28.6% of patients were only treated with topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

In patients with moderate to severe CHE, most received systemic therapy with one-quarter on biologic therapy. However, given that many of these treatments have limited evidence of efficacy in CHE, there is a need for studies specifically in patients with CHE as well as new therapeutic options.

Transcriptomics- and Genomics-Guided Drug Repurposing for the Treatment of Vesicular Hand Eczema

Vesicular hand eczema (VHE), a clinical subtype of hand eczema (HE), showed limited responsiveness to alitretinoin, the only approved systemic treatment for severe chronic HE. This emphasizes the need for alternative treatment approaches. Therefore, our study aimed to identify drug repurposing opportunities for VHE using transcriptomics and genomics data. We constructed a gene network by combining 52 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from a VHE transcriptomics study with 3 quantitative trait locus (QTL) genes associated with HE. Through network analysis, clustering, and functional enrichment analyses, we investigated the underlying biological mechanisms of this network. Next, we leveraged drug-gene interactions and retrieved pharmaco-transcriptomics data from the DrugBank database to identify drug repurposing opportunities for (V)HE. We developed a drug ranking system, primarily based on efficacy, safety, and practical and pricing factors, to select the most promising drug repurposing candidates. Our results revealed that the (V)HE network comprised 78 genes that yielded several biological pathways underlying the disease. The drug-gene interaction search together with pharmaco-transcriptomics lookups revealed 123 unique drug repurposing opportunities. Based on our drug ranking system, our study identified the most promising drug repurposing opportunities (e.g., vitamin D analogues, retinoids, and immunomodulating drugs) that might be effective in treating (V)HE.

Validation of the Investigator Global Assessment of Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA-CHE): a new clinician reported outcome measure of CHE severity

The Investigator Global Assessment of Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA-CHE) is a novel Clinician-Reported Outcome measure that allows investigators to assess cross-sectional CHE global disease severity using clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, oedema, and fissures as guidelines for overall severity assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the IGA-CHE for use as an outcome measure in CHE clinical trials and clinical practice. Psychometric analyses were performed using data from a sample of 280 patients with moderate to severe CHE from a phase 3 trial of delgocitinib cream, pooled across treatment groups. Test-retest reliability results were moderate to strong with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.76. Correlations with measures assessing related concepts were moderate or strong (range 0.65-0.72) and exceeded a priori hypotheses, providing evidence of convergent validity. Known-groups validity was supported by statistically significant differences between severity groups (< 0.001). Within-group effect sizes were consistently larger for improved groups compared to stable groups, providing evidence of ability to detect change. Anchor-based analyses generated within-subject meaningful change estimates ranging from - 0.8 to - 2.3. A correlation weighted average suggested a single value of - 1.7 in change from baseline. These findings provide evidence the IGA-CHE scale has strong reliability, construct validity, and ability to detect change, supporting its use as an endpoint in CHE clinical trials and clinical practice. Based on the evidence, 2-level changes in IGA-CHE score are considered a conservative meaningful change threshold; however, findings also indicate 1-level change in IGA-CHE scores reflects a clinically meaningful improvement for patients.Clinical trial registration: NCT04871711.

Dupilumab treatment improves signs, symptoms, quality of life, and work productivity in patients with atopic hand and foot dermatitis: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite high disease burden, systemic treatment options for patients with atopic hand and/or foot dermatitis (H/F AD) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate efficacy and safety of dupilumab in H/F AD using specific instruments for assessing disease severity on hands and feet.

METHODS

In this multicenter phase 3 trial, adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe H/F AD were randomized to dupilumab monotherapy (regimen approved for generalized AD), or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment score 0 or 1 at week 16. Secondary prespecified endpoints assessed the severity and extent of signs, symptom intensity (itch, pain), quality of life, and sleep.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (adults = 106, adolescents = 27) were randomized to dupilumab (n = 67) or placebo (n = 66). At week 16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab (n = 27) than placebo (n = 11) achieved Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment score 0 or 1 (40.3% vs 16.7%; P = .003). All other prespecified endpoints were met. Safety was consistent with the known AD dupilumab profile.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term, 16-week treatment period.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab monotherapy resulted in significant improvements across different domains of H/F AD with acceptable safety, supporting dupilumab as a systemic treatment approach for this often difficult to treat condition.

Cream versus ointment: Randomized single-blinded study on the adherence to treatment with topical methylprednisolone aceponate

BACKGROUND

Overall adherence in the treatment of chronic dermatoses is poor. Textbooks state an adherence dependence on galenics.

TRIAL DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, parallel-grouped, single-blinded (investigator), monocentric clinical trial (phase IV) on the adherence to treatment of chronic mild to moderate hand eczema with topical methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA, Advantan®) in different vehicles.

OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS

Primary objective was the assessment of the adherence depending on vehicle type in patients with chronic hand eczema. Secondary objective was improvement after a 4-week treatment period. Primary Endpoint Adherence is defined as the percentage of patients applying at least aimed daily dose. Prescribed daily dose was defined as the planned number of applications per day (1) * surface (measured) * aimed amount per application (mg/cm2 ). Truly applicated daily dose was evaluated as individual mean amount per dose * individual mean number of applications per day. Adherence was assumed, if truly applicated daily dose is at least 75% of the prescribed daily dose and the individual mean number of applications per day is at least 0.85. Secondary Endpoint Efficacy was measured by improvement of Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) after a 4-week treatment period and in addition to Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pruritus.

METHODS

Number of participants randomized to each group 40, 80 total. Group 1 MPA-C: Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream and barrier repair emollient (Bepanthen® Sensiderm). Group 2 MPA-FO: Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% fatty ointment and barrier repair emollient (Bepanthen® Sensiderm). Adherence to treatment was compared via Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 48% were adherent according to our definition. There was no significant difference between MPA-C (42.1%) and MPA-FO (54.1%; p = 0.36; group difference-12.0%, 95% CI-34.3%-11.5%). Generalized-linear-model-analysis of adherence to study treatment with factors emollient use, treatment, time and treatment-time interaction showed a parallel between adherence and amount of emollient use (odds ratio 1.74, p = 0.0038; 95% CI-1.22-2.52). Improvement of hand eczema was seen according to clinical scores without remarkable differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No dependence of adherence on galenics of topical treatment of chronic hand eczema could be proved. Patients who use more emollient tend to be more adherent to the topical treatment.

Real-World Clinical Experience of Dupilumab in the Treatment of Chronic Palmo-Plantar Eczema in Patients with Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Follow-Up

Background: Hand-foot eczema (HFE) are special locations of dermatitis, which are often associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) and have a significant negative impact on the quality of life, demanding a clinically relevant improvement. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of eczema localized in hands and/or feet in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study of adult patients with HFE treated with dupilumab for their AD. Patients with other concomitantly systemic immunosuppressive treatments did not undergo a washout period. The severity of palmar and/or plantar involvement was assessed using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scale on a scale of 0 ( = clear) to 5 ( = very severe). Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and NRS-pruritus scales were also evaluated. One hundred percent of patients reached week 16, while 67/84 reached week 52 of follow-up. Results: A total of 84 patients were included 86.69% of patients showed a reduction in PGA-Hand, and 80.34% in PGA-Foot at week 52, EASI improvement was reached by 83.55% of patients at week 16 and 87.35% at week 52. Reduction of pruritus (≥4 points in NRS-pruritus scale) was 73.01% at week 16 and 80.67% at week 52. No differences in response to dupilumab were observed in the different subtypes of palmo-plantar dermatitis. Conclusions: The results obtained in our study suggest that dupilumab may be an effective and safe therapeutic option for the treatment of dermatitis localized in hands and/or feet.

Efficacy of Oral Alitretinoin in Treatment of Mycosis Fungoides Palmaris et Plantaris

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Comparative Study of Efficacy Between Cyclosporine and Alitretinoin in Patients With Chronic Hand Eczema

Background: Systemic remedies such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, and retinoids are off-license treatment options that are considered for severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) that is resistant to first-line treatment. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal treatment of CHE patients, including those with atopic dermatitis, and to compare the efficacy between cyclosporine and alitretinoin. Methods: This study was retrospective and included CHE patients who visited the Department of Dermatology at Hanyang University Seoul Hospital in Korea between March 2013 and February 2020. Results: A total of 95 CHE patients was included in this study. In the cyclosporine treatment group, there were more patients with severe baseline Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) (P = 0.033) and higher immunoglobulin E (IgE) level (P = 0.019). The mean recurrence duration was 15.9 weeks in the alitretinoin group and 22.9 weeks in the cyclosporine group, the difference between which was not statistically significant. In a subgroup analysis according to treatment drug, only the low IgE group showed a better recurrence profile for alitretinoin treatment compared to cyclosporine treatment (P = 0.039). When comparing the cumulative recurrence rate during the treatment period and subsequent follow-up periods, the cyclosporine group showed a greater incidence of recurrence than the alitretinoin group in all follow-up periods. The results of our study are consistent with the previously reported efficacy of alitretinoin. Despite the rapid response in the cyclosporine group, 12 weeks of CHE treatment with alitretinoin showed superior efficacy compared to cyclosporine treatment. Conclusions: Both alitretinoin and cyclosporine groups showed efficacy in patients with CHE. Cyclosporine is an alternative treatment of CHE that is refractory to alitretinoin or relapses after its use, especially in the presence of atopic dermatitis.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic hand eczema with inadequate response or intolerance to alitretinoin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment options for patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE) are scarce. Dupilumab is licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and has shown promising results for the treatment of hand eczema in other studies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with severe CHE (subtypes recurrent vesicular hand eczema or chronic fissured hand eczema) who have an inadequate response/intolerance to alitretinoin, or when alitretinoin is medically inadvisable.

METHODS

In this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept phase IIb trial, patients with severe CHE were randomized 2 : 1 to dupilumab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Patients visited the outpatient clinic at the initiation of the study drug, and every 4 weeks until 16 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 75% improvement on the Hand Eczema Severity Index score (HECSI-75) at week 16. Adverse events were monitored during each visit. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04512339).

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients were randomized, and 29 patients received the assigned study drug (dupilumab n = 20, placebo n = 9). At week 16, more patients achieved HECSI-75 in the dupilumab group than in the placebo group {95% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1-99.7] vs. 33% [95% CI 9.0-69.1]}. Dupilumab also showed greater least square mean percentage change from baseline to week 16 in peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale compared with placebo [-66.5 ± 10.7 (95% CI -88.6 to -44.5) vs. -25.3 ± 17.0 (95% CI -60.1-9.4)]. Adverse events were similar for the dupilumab and placebo groups and were mostly mild. There were no serious adverse events, nor did any of the adverse events lead to discontinuation of the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to provide more evidence on the -efficacy of dupilumab in CHE. Moreover, larger studies could also enable comparisons between clinical subtypes or aetiological -diagnoses.

Alitretinoin as a Treatment Modality for Ichthyosis in Women of Childbearing Age: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Acitretin, a synthetic vitamin A derivative, is the most studied and widely used oral retinoid for ichthyoses. Its major disadvantage is the need for contraceptive measures during 3 years after discontinuation. An alternative is needed for women of childbearing age. With alitretinoin, another retinoid, pregnancy is considered safe 1 month after discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to provide evidence for alitretinoin as an alternative for acitretin for ichthyosis in women of childbearing age. Our experience is shared in a case series combined with an overview of the current literature.

METHODS

Nine women of childbearing age (19-31 years, median 21) with different subtypes of ichthyosis (autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis, (superficial) epidermolytic ichthyosis, erythrokeratoderma variabilis, and epidermolytic epidermal nevi, a mosaic form of epidermolytic ichthyosis) were included and treated with 30 mg alitretinoin during 2-28 months. Severity was measured by Ichthyosis Area Severity Index (IASI) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA). A literature search in Pubmed using the Mesh terms "alitretinoin," "skin diseases, genetic" and "ichthyosis" was performed.

RESULTS

Significant reduction in the mean scores of IGA, IASI-erythema, IASI-scaling, and IASI-total was seen. Seven patients are still being treated, 1 patient stopped to become pregnant, 1 patient discontinued due to financial reasons. Observed side effects were reversible headache (n = 6), asteatotic eczema (n = 1), "not feeling well" temporarily (n = 1), and easier blistering of the feet (n = 1). The literature search resulted in six case reports and case series about alitretinoin in ichthyosis and ichthyosis syndromes with in total 29 patients. The vast majority of articles (21/29) reported significant improvement or even complete remission of skin symptoms. However, validated outcome measures to support these results were lacking. Side effects (n = 16) were relatively mild, except for benign intracranial hypertension (n = 1) and autoimmune hypothyroidism (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows, with validated outcome measures, that alitretinoin is effective to mitigate the symptoms of ichthyosis in women of childbearing age and a suitable alternative to acitretin.

Psychosocial Consequences of Hand Eczema-A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Hand eczema (HE) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a high prevalence, negatively influencing patients' quality of life (QoL). It may also affect patients' psychological status. The aim of this study was to assess and characterize the psychological burden of HE, its influence on patients' QoL, and the presence and severity of anxiety and depressive disorders in HE patients.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 100 adult HE individuals. To assess the severity of the disease, two instruments were used: the Investigator Global Assessment for Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA-CHE) scale and the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI). Assessment of patients' quality of life (QoL) was obtained with the use of the DLQI tool. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaires were employed to assess depression and anxiety, respectively, as well as a modified version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-M).

RESULTS

The mean DLQI value for the whole group reached 11.62 ± 6.35 points (13.27 ± 6.67 points in females and 9.15 ± 4.95 points in males; p = 0.023). A decrease in QoL correlated positively with the severity of the disease and the severity of itch and pain. In 17 patients (17%), a possible diagnosis of depressive disorder was found. Patients scoring higher results on the PHQ-9 and HADS-M depression (D) questionnaires reported greater intensity of the itch (r = 0.363, p < 0.001, and r = 0.237, p = 0.017, respectively) and the pain (r = 0.445, p < 0.001, and r = 0.287, p = 0.004, respectively). The anxiety disorder might possibly be diagnosed in 25% of patients (n = 25). This study revealed a positive correlation between the severity of the anxiety symptoms, measured with the use of both GAD-7 and HADS-M anxiety (A) tools, and the intensity of the pain (r = 0.248, p = 0.013, and r = 0.342, p = 0.001, respectively). The severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms correlated positively with the severity of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychosocial burden of HE is an undeniable phenomenon. The disorder influences patients' QoL and may cause mental disturbances such as depression and anxiety disorders.

Effect of upadacitinib on atopic hand eczema in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from two randomized phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Approximately 60% of patients with atopic dermatitis have involvement of the hands adding to the burden of disease.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aims to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib monotherapy on atopic hand eczema in patients with moderate-to-severe AD over 16 weeks in the Measure Up 1 and 2 studies.

METHODS

Data from patients (ages 12-75) randomized 1:1:1 to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, or placebo once daily in the Measure Up 1 and 2 studies were analysed for impact on atopic hand eczema assessed using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI). The percent change from baseline in HECSI score was a prespecified additional endpoint at all visits. The proportion of patients with at least a 75% improvement in HECSI score (HECSI 75) was evaluated post hoc.

RESULTS

Patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg experienced greater improvement in HECSI score compared with placebo as early as Week 1, which was maintained through Week 16. At Week 16, the mean change from baseline in HECSI score for patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, and placebo was -68%, -74%, and -15% in Measure Up 1 and -68%, -74% and +21% (positive change indicates worsening for placebo) in Measure Up 2, respectively. A greater proportion of upadacitinib-treated patients achieved HECSI 75 compared with placebo at all timepoints beginning at Week 1 through Week 16.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg monotherapy provided rapid and sustained improvement in atopic hand eczema compared with placebo through Week 16 in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. At Week 16, the observed mean improvements in HECSI score in upadacitinib-treated patients were clinically meaningful based on previous interpretability studies. These results suggest that upadacitinib may be an effective treatment option for atopic hand eczema in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

S2k-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Prävention und Therapie des Handekzems: S2k guideline diagnosis, prevention and therapy of hand eczema

Die S2k‐Leitlinie „Diagnostik, Prävention und Therapie des Handekzems (HE)“ gibt auf der Grundlage eines evidenz‐ und konsensbasierten Ansatzes konkrete Handlungsanweisungen und Empfehlungen für die Diagnostik, Prävention und Therapie des HE. Die Leitlinie wurde auf der Grundlage der deutschen Leitlinie „Management von Handekzemen“ aus dem Jahr 2009 und der aktuellen Leitlinie der European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) „Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hand eczema“ aus dem Jahr 2022 erstellt. Allgemeines Ziel der Leitlinie ist es, Dermatologen und Allergologen in der Praxis und Klinik eine akzeptierte, evidenzbasierte Entscheidungshilfe für die Auswahl sowie Durchführung einer geeigneten und suffizienten Therapie für Patienten mit Handekzemen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die Leitlinie basiert auf zwei Cochrane‐Reviews zu therapeutischen und präventiven Interventionen beim HE. Die übrigen Kapitel wurden überwiegend basierend auf nicht systematischen Literaturrecherchen durch die Expertengruppe erarbeitet und konsentiert. Die Expertenkommission bestand aus Mitgliedern von allergologischen und berufsdermatologischen Fachgesellschaften und Arbeitsgruppen, einer Patientenvertretung und Methodikern. Im Rahmen einer Konsensuskonferenz am 15.09.2022 wurden die Vorschläge für die Empfehlungen und Kernaussagen unter Verwendung eines nominalen Gruppenprozesses konsentiert. Der strukturierte Konsensfindungsprozess wurde professionell moderiert. Die vorliegende Leitlinie hat eine Gültigkeit bis zum 22.02.2028.

A Review of Existing and New Treatments for the Management of Hand Eczema

Hand eczema is a chronic condition that affects an estimated 14.5% of the general population. It has severe quality of life ramifications in those that struggle with it, including days missed from work or school, productivity loss and impaired work functioning. For years, the standard of care included topical moisturizing creams, topical steroids and more recently systemic agents. As new therapeutic targets emerge and recent advances are being developed, it is now more possible than ever that hand eczema can be managed via the underlying mechanisms. A review of the literature was conducted to identify current treatment options for hand eczema and chronic hand eczema. The terms 'hand eczema', 'hand dermatitis' were used to search PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase. To identify new therapies still undergoing investigation, we used the terms 'hand eczema', 'hand dermatitis', 'atopic dermatitis', and 'vesicular eczema of hands and/or feet' to search Clinicaltrials.gov for all studies until December 2022. There were 56 ongoing clinical trials identified for pharmacological treatments for hand eczema on Clinicaltrials.gov from 2000 - 2022, with 16 that are new or ongoing. These included studies for dupilumab, ruxolitinib, delgocitinib (LEO124249), gusacitinib (ASN002), AFX 5931, and roflumilast (ARQ-252). Two major classes of drugs emerging for the treatment of hand eczema include IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors. With the increase in efficacy seen with these new drugs, we are also noting improved adverse effect profiles, making them attractive options to add to a clinician's management toolbox for patients with hand eczema.

S2k guideline diagnosis, prevention, and therapy of hand eczema

The consensus-based guideline "Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema (HE)" provides concrete instructions and recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, and therapy of HE based on an evidence- and consensus-based approach. The guideline was created based on the German guideline "Management von Handekzemen" from 2009 and the current guideline of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) "Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema" from 2022. The general goal of the guideline is to provide dermatologists and allergologists in practice and clinics with an accepted, evidence-based decision-making tool for selecting and conducting suitable and sufficient therapy for patients with hand eczema. The guideline is based on two Cochrane reviews of therapeutic and preventive interventions for HE. The remaining chapters were mainly developed and consented based on non-systematic literature research by the expert group. The expert group consisted of members of allergological and occupational dermatological professional associations and working groups, a patient representative, and methodologists. The proposals for recommendations and key statements were consented by using a nominal group process during a consensus conference on September 15, 2022. The structured consensus-building process was professionally moderated. This guideline is valid until February 22, 2028.

Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO2 Laser Combined with Halometasone Cream for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Hand Eczema: A Prospective, Single-Center, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fractional CO₂ laser combined with halometasone cream in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic hand eczema (CHE).

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial including 67 patients with moderate-to-severe CHE was carried out. Patients were randomly assigned to group A (n = 33, fractional CO₂ laser once every 4 weeks 1-2 times and halometasone cream twice daily for 8 weeks) or group B (n = 34, halometasone cream alone twice daily for 8 weeks). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving treatment success at week 12 in each group. Secondary endpoints included differences between groups in the change of hand eczema severity index (HECSI), patient global assessment (PaGA), dermatology life quality index (DLQI), and quality of life in hand eczema questionnaire (QOLHEQ) from baseline to week 12. Relapse rate and adverse effects were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients in each group completed the trial. At week 12, the treatment success rate was 62.1% (18/29) in group A and 27.6% (8/29) in group B (p = 0.009). At week 12, HECSI, PaGA, DLQI, and QOLHEQ all decreased compared with baseline in both groups (p < 0.05). HECSI, DLQI, and QOLHEQ decreased more in group A than group B (p = 0.014, 0.010, and 0.014, respectively), but there was no significant difference in change of PaGA between the two groups (1.0 versus 3.0, p = 0.419). Among patients achieving treatment success, 11.1% (2/18) patients in group A and 50.0% (4/8) patients in group B relapsed at week 24 (p = 0.011). Skin pigmentation was the most common adverse effect.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with moderate-to-severe CHE, fractional CO₂ laser combined with halometasone cream is more effective than halometasone cream alone, with few adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100051948.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Itch and Pain in Patients Suffering from Chronic Hand Eczema

BACKGROUND

Hand eczema (HE) is a frequent chronic inflammatory dermatosis. Itch and pain are considered two of the most common and burdensome symptoms of the disease. Yet, the data related to these symptoms are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of itch and pain in adults suffering from HE.

METHODS

The study group comprised 100 adult HE patients. An original questionnaire designed by the authors was used to survey the patients. It included questions regarding demographic characteristics such as the duration of the disease, exacerbation count, past diagnostics and treatment, as well as atopic predispositions. Additionally, the itch and pain intensity (numerical rating scale-NRS) during '3 days prior to the study' and the 'entire disease' period was implemented. The clinical assessment of the disease severity was performed according to two specific measurement instruments: Investigator Global Assessment for Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA-CHE) scale and Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI). To assess patient quality of life (QoL), the DLQI tool was used and to determine the level of stigmatization and for its impact on patients' life the 6-Item Stigmatization Scale (6-ISS) was employed.

RESULTS

Within the period of 3 days prior to the examination, itch was reported by 81.0% of patients (n = 81), whereas 53.0% (n = 53) of them experienced pain. Both symptoms were reported more frequently in females (itch: p = 0.022; pain: p = 0.033). When sexes were compared, females reached higher scores in both IGA-CHE and HECSI. Itch and pain intensity correlated positively with disease severity. The intensity of itch and pain significantly influences HE patients' QoL. A positive correlation between the 6-ISS score and the intensity of itch in the 'last 3 days' period was revealed (r = 0.221; p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Itch and pain are common symptoms in HE patients, significantly contributing to the feeling of stigmatization. Providing characteristics of itch and pain may improve HE management. Symptom-decreasing treatment would definitely have a positive influence on patients' well-being.

Achieving consensus on patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for inflammatory skin disorders

BACKGROUND

International Dermatology Outcome Measures and the American Academy of Dermatology recently agreed on a physician-reported global severity measure to demonstrate quality of care in inflammatory dermatoses.

OBJECTIVE

Because patient-reported outcome measures are also important, we aimed to achieve consensus on 1 of these measures for clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients and providers participated in a consensus-building study involving a modified-Delphi technique. Voting was focused on identifying a minimal set of assessments for clinical practice, patient global assessments (PtGAs), Skindex instruments, and final instrument selection for quality improvement.

RESULTS

Among 53 stakeholders, >70% agreed that identification of patient goals, assessment of treatment harm, and assessment of the adequacy of treatment response were the minimal assessments needed for clinical practice. The most preferred PtGA was a 5-point PtGA (scale 0-4; 0 = clear, 4 = severe) having an optional check-box for worst ever. A new metric to assess change since treatment initiation, which we called a trajectory measure, was proposed. Stakeholders preferred Skindex instruments over PtGAs and a trajectory measure for clinical practice.

LIMITATIONS

A small number of patients and caregivers were involved and a consensus was not reached on all items.

CONCLUSION

PtGAs as standalone measures do not adequately capture the patient's assessment of disease severity or the effect of care. The combination of a PtGA with a Skindex instrument or another measure of health-related quality of life might provide a more comprehensive evaluation of patients in clinical practice.

Bioanalysis of Endogenous Isotretinoin in Altered and Unaltered Human Plasma by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Electrospray Ionization

Bioanalytical method development and validation of endogenous Isotretinoin with Isotretinoin D5 as internal standard was done as per current regulatory guidelines. The method is simple, rugged and sensitive enough to estimate endogenous Isotretinoin using the chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. An alternative approach has been adopted for quantitative analysis of endogenous Isotretinoin in human plasma. Isotretinoin free matrix (surrogate matrix) was prepared and further used for the development and validation of Isotretinoin. The method was validated in altered and unaltered plasma. The chromatographic optimization was done with column (ACE C18, 100 × 4.6 mm I.D. 5 μm particle size), using a mobile phase containing 1 mM ammonium acetate, pH 3.0 as a solvent A and solvent B (1 mM ammonium acetate (pH 3.0) with acetonitrile in a ratio of 10:90). A flow rate was set at 0.75 mL/min in a binary gradient mode. The analyte was recovered by liquid-liquid extraction method with diethyl ether as an extraction solvent. Multi-reaction monitoring mode in negative polarity was implemented for the quantification of endogenous Isotretinoin in plasma. The calibration curve of Isotretinoin was linear (r2 > 0.9992) over the concentration range of 0.5-1000 ng/mL. The intra-day precision was found in a range of 2.0-3.9% CV for altered samples and 0.9-3.7% CV for unaltered samples. The inter-day precision was found 2.6-6.1% CV for altered samples and 1.3-3.8% CV for unaltered samples. The average recovery of the extraction procedure was found 64.6% for altered samples and 62.2% for unaltered samples.

European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

Current emerging and investigational drugs for the treatment of chronic hand eczema

INTRODUCTION

: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent, burdensome condition associated with functional impairment. Currently, topical therapeutics are the mainstay of CHE management. However, many cases are refractory to existing topical therapeutics, and the few existing systemic options are often limited in efficacy and by their side effect profiles.

AREAS COVERED

: Following a brief overview of CHE pathogenesis and existing treatments, this review will outline the mechanisms and available data on emerging and investigational drugs currently being studied in clinical trials for the treatment of CHE.

EXPERT OPINION

: Immunomodulatory drugs such as topical and systemic JAK inhibitors and Th2-targeting antibodies such as dupilumab are currently under investigation for CHE treatment, with early promise. Management of CHE will likely move toward more targeted treatments through clinical trials and away from broad immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine and methotrexate, which have previously been investigated for CHE and have more side effects. In coming years, CHE patients may benefit from a wider range of both topical and systemic therapeutics that target immune pathways relevant to the various CHE subtypes.

The long-term effect of dupilumab on chronic hand eczema in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis - 52 week results from the Dutch BioDay registry

Background

The hands are a common predilection site of atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab is licensed for the treatment of AD but not for chronic hand eczema (CHE), while CHE is challenging to treat.

Objectives

To evaluate the long‐term effect of dupilumab on hand eczema (HE) in patients with AD from the BioDay Registry.

Methods

A prospective observational study of adult patients with HE, treated for AD with dupilumab. Patients with a HE severity of at least moderate at baseline were considered for analysis. Patients with other concomitantly systemic immunosuppressive treatments were excluded. Clinical effectiveness on HE severity, using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and photographic guide, and health‐related quality of life, using the Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ), were evaluated.

Results

A total of 72 patients were included. HECSI‐75 was achieved by 54/62 patients (87.1%) and HECSI‐90 by 39/72 (62.9%) at 52 weeks. Based on the photographic guide, 56/62 patients (90.3%) achieved the endpoint of ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’. Mean QOLHEQ reduction was −63.5% (95% confidence interval −38.23 to −27.41). There was no difference in response between HE subtypes.

Conclusions

The results from this study hold promise for dupilumab to be a suitable treatment option for isolated CHE.

Comparison of ALitretinoin with PUVA as the first-line treatment in patients with severe chronic HAnd eczema (ALPHA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Hand eczema (HE) is one of the most common skin disorders and an important cause for morbidity and occupational disability. The 1-year prevalence of HE is estimated to be up to 10% and it is estimated that 5%-7% of those develop severe chronic HE. However, current clinical evidence is not compelling enough to guide clinical practice. In a survey among 194 UK dermatologists the most frequent first choice approaches were psoralen combined with ultraviolet A (UVA) treatment (PUVA), oral steroids and alitretinoin (AL). When asked which strategy was most efficient for long-term outcome 20% of clinicians indicated they did not know; 43% of clinicians reported AL and 30% reported PUVA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

ALPHA is a multicentre, open, prospective, two-arm parallel group, randomised controlled trial comparing PUVA and AL with a planned sample size re-estimation. Between 500 and 780 participants will be randomised on a 1:1 basis. The physician's global assessment (PGA) will direct treatment after randomisation, non-responders will be treated according to usual clinical practice; providing valuable pilot data on second line therapeutic approaches to inform future trials.Assessments will be conducted up to 52 weeks post randomisation. The primary outcome measure is the Hand Eczema Severity Index at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include modified Total Lesion Symptom Score, PGA, time to relapse, patient reported outcome measures and DNA extraction and assessment of genetic variants. A substudy on molecular inflammatory mediators will provide information on subgroup specific treatment responses. Photographs will be taken and HE severity assessed by a central review panel.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from Leeds West Research Ethics Committee (14/YH/1259).Trial results will be disseminated at relevant clinical conferences and societies, published in peer-reviewed journals and through relevant patient groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN80206075.

The pan-JAK inhibitor delgocitinib in a cream formulation demonstrates dose-response in chronic hand eczema in a 16-week randomised phase 2b trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a burdensome disease, and new well-documented, safe, and efficacious treatments are warranted. In a recent CHE phase 2a trial, the pan-Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor delgocitinib in an ointment formulation was found to be efficacious and well-tolerated.

OBJECTIVES

This trial assessed the dose-response, efficacy, and safety of delgocitinib cream in CHE.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase 2b dose-ranging trial, adults with CHE and a recent history of inadequate response or contraindication to topical corticosteroids were randomised to delgocitinib cream 1, 3, 8, 20 mg/g or vehicle treatment twice daily for 16 weeks. Primary endpoint was Investigator's Global Assessment for CHE (IGA-CHE) treatment success (0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline to Week 16). Secondary endpoints were time to IGA-CHE treatment success and changes in Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI); other endpoints were itch and pain NRS scores, and Patient's Global Assessment (PaGA) at Week 16.

RESULTS

258 patients were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to delgocitinib cream 1, 3, 8, 20 mg/g or vehicle. A significant dose-response relationship was established for IGA-CHE (p<0.025). IGA-CHE treatment success at Week 16 was achieved in 21.2% (1 mg/g), 7.8% (3 mg/g), 36.5% (8 mg/g), 37.7% (20 mg/g), and 8.0% (vehicle) of patients. Delgocitinib 8 and 20 mg/g showed a treatment effect against vehicle (p<0.001). Similarly, there were improvements in HECSI, itch and pain NRS scores, and PaGA. Delgocitinib cream was well-tolerated with majority of adverse events being mild or moderate and considered unrelated to treatment. Most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis (17.3%-29.4% in delgocitinib groups vs 40% in vehicle group), eczema (5.8%-11.3% in delgocitinib groups vs 16.0% in vehicle group) and headache (3.8%-11.5% in delgocitinib groups vs 4.0% in vehicle group).

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, delgocitinib cream showed a dose-response relationship in terms of efficacy and was well-tolerated.

Low Dose Oral Alitretinoin With Narrowband Ultraviolet B Therapy for Chronic Hand Dermatitis

Background

Chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) is difficult to treat and has high individual and societal burdens. Phototherapy and oral alitretinoin are safe monotherapies for CHD, but their combination has not been assessed.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of low dose oral alitretinoin combined with phototherapy versus high dose oral alitretinoin for CHD refractory to topical corticosteroids.

Methods

This retrospective study of adult patients with CHD refractory to topical corticosteroid therapy compared low dose oral alitretinoin (10 mg three times weekly) combined with narrowband ultraviolet B therapy (three times weekly; LDA-UVB) to high dose oral alitretinoin (30 mg daily; HDA) for 16 weeks. Outcomes were improvement in disease severity measured by the Physician’s Global Assessment and quality of life measured with the Dermatology Life Quality Index.

Results

The mean age of the study population (n = 64) was 41.25 years and 57.8% were male. Both cohorts experienced improvements in disease severity and quality of life after 16 weeks, however, significantly more participants who received LDA-UVB (n = 21/33, 63.6%) achieved “clear” or “almost clear” assessments compared to those who received HDA (n = 12/31, 38.7%; P < .05). Adverse effects were significantly more prevalent in the HDA group (P < .0001) and included headache, elevated cholesterol, and dry lips.

Conclusions

The combination of low dose oral alitretinoin with narrowband-UVB therapy was more effective and had fewer adverse effects compared to high dose oral alitretinoin for participants with CHD refractory to topical corticosteroid therapy.

Alitretinoin for the treatment of severe chronic eczema of the hands

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a frequent skin disorder affecting up to 10% of the population and strongly reduces Quality of Life (QoL). The first-line therapeutic strategies for the management of CHE include a change of lifestyle, an education program for the skin and the application of specific emollients. Topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors are the most used anti-inflammatory drugs. However, up to 65% of patients require systemic options. Alitretinoin, a retinoid structurally related to vitamin A, is the first systemic treatment approved in the European Union (EU) for severe CHE refractory to potent topical corticosteroids.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the available data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety profile of oral alitretinoin for the treatment of CHE.

EXPERT OPINION

Alitretinoin can be considered as a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of CHE in patients not responding to ordinary treatments. Clinical trials and real-life experiences showed that it acts effectively on both objective and subjective clinical signs, resulting in a significant improvement in QoL of patients. As for other retinoids, caution should be taken in patients with certain chronic diseases (hepatopathies, kidney failure, hyperlipidemia, thyroid dysfunction) or childbearing potential women.

2020 Korean Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Hand Eczema

Background

Hand eczema refers to eczema located on the hands, regardless of its etiology or morphology. Despite its high prevalence and significant impact on patients' quality of life, treatment is frequently challenging because of its heterogeneity, chronic and recurrent course, and lack of well-organized randomized controlled trials of the various treatment options.

Objective

These consensus guidelines aim to provide evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and management of hand eczema to improve patient care by helping physicians make more efficient and transparent decisions.

Methods

A modified Delphi method, comprising two rounds of email questionnaires with face-to-face meetings in between, was adopted for the consensus process that took place between February and September 2020. Forty experts in the field of skin allergy and contact dermatitis were invited to participate in the expert panel.

Results

Consensus was reached for the domains of classification, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment; and a therapeutic ladder to manage chronic hand eczema was developed.

Conclusion

These are the first consensus guidelines for chronic hand eczema in the Asian population, which will help standardize care and assist clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic hand eczema.

Treatment with alitretinoin in patients taking part in a tertiary individual prevention program for work-related skin diseases

BACKGROUND

Patients taking part in a tertiary individual prevention program (TIP) for work-related skin diseases frequently have chronic hand eczema (HE) for which alitretinoin is a treatment option.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate treatment with alitretinoin before and during the TIP and related factors.

METHODS

Data of 1614 patients taking part in the TIP between January 2015 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-eight patients (21.6%) reported treatment with alitretinoin prior to the TIP showing an increase over time, particularly in men. In 45 patients (2.8%), alitretinoin treatment was initiated during the TIP. Treatment with alitretinoin was significantly less common among female than male patients, both prior to (P < .001) and during the TIP (P = .015). Female patients who had received alitretinoin in the past were significantly older than the other female patients (P < .001). Among patients treated with alitretinoin prior to the TIP, women had a significantly higher disease severity at admission than men (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

About twenty percent of patients reported treatment with alitretinoin prior to the TIP. The data indicate that treatment of female TIP patients with alitretinoin is less frequent than among male patients and depends on age and disease severity.

[Pitfalls in occupational dermatology]

Occupational dermatology has become a vibrant and interesting specialty, particularly in recent years. This includes more than hand eczema (HE). The increasing prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) has led to an increase of atopic hand eczema which can be worsened in certain occupations. New systemic therapies have improved the range of treatments for HE. The current guideline on hand eczema includes a variety of topical and systemic therapies. Nevertheless, in daily occupational dermatological practice, there are still chronic cases, especially vesicular hand eczema. They can often not be assigned to a clear cause, which is often a problem for those who are affected. In addition, co-factors such as chronic infectious comorbidities and psychological factors/illnesses must be considered. We present challenges in occupational dermatology by reporting special cases.

Handekzem – Gleiche Therapie für alle Formen?

Es gibt nicht einen einzigen Typ des chronischen Handekzems (CHE) – weder morphologisch noch immunologisch. Schutz und Präventionsmaßnahmen können für alle Typen des CHE definiert werden. Die Therapie muss passen und zielgerichtet sein. Einige Therapien können jedoch für alle Typen des Handekzems angeboten werden wie topische Kortikosteroide, Calcineurinantagonisten, UV-Therapie und Alitretinoin, ggf. auch Dupilumab, was in größeren Studien untersucht werden sollte. Die Wahrnehmung des Handekzems sollte gerade in Zeiten der Irritation durch Desinfektion der Hände erhöht werden, damit Prävention und frühzeitige Therapie erfolgen können.

The cardiovascular safety of oral alitretinoin: a population-based cohort study involving 19 513 patients exposed to oral alitretinoin

BACKGROUND

Oral alitretinoin is a retinoid used for severe chronic hand eczema. Although caution is recommended for patients with uncontrolled dyslipidaemia or cardiovascular risk factors, the actual atherothrombotic risk has not been investigated thus far.

OBJECTIVES

To detect any excess of atherothrombotic events among patients exposed to alitretinoin, during treatment or in the 2 years following initiation.

METHODS

Using the French Health Insurance database, we compared the number of patients who had an atherothrombotic event (coronary artery disease, ischaemic stroke or peripheral artery disease requiring revascularization) in the population exposed to oral alitretinoin vs. the general population of the same age, sex and baseline cardiovascular risk, using standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs).

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2017, 19 513 patients were exposed to oral alitretinoin in France. Sixty-four (0·3%) patients had an atherothrombotic event while on alitretinoin. Patients receiving alitretinoin experienced no more atherothrombotic events than the general population: patients without cardiovascular risk factors or previous atherothrombotic events had a SMR of 0·65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·26-1·34] during alitretinoin treatment, and 1·21 (95% CI 0·90-1·59) in the 2 years following initiation; patients with cardiovascular risk factors or previous atherothrombotic events had a SMR of 0·82 (95% CI 0·60-1·08) during alitretinoin treatment and 0·95 (95% CI 0·82-1·09) in the 2 years following initiation. Taken separately, SMRs for each outcome did not increase either.

CONCLUSIONS

These data from an exhaustive nationwide population-based study do not support an increase in the incidence of atherothrombotic events with alitretinoin use, regardless of the baseline cardiovascular risk of the patient.

DECISA Project (DErmatology Clinics in Italy: Survey on Alitretinoin): A real-life retrospective cohort multicenter study on 438 subjects with chronic hand eczema

Alitretinoin is the only systemic agent approved to treat moderate-severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. No nationwide Italian data regarding real-life efficacy, safety, and tolerability of treatment are available. The DECISA project (DErmatology Clinics in Italy: Survey on Alitretinoin) retrospectively examined data from a registry including 15 Dermatology Clinics authorized to prescription of alitretinoin for CHE patients. Disease severity was assessed at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of treatment, using the 5-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and the modified Total Lesion-Symptoms-Severity (mTLSS) scores. Between November 2010 and July 2018, data of 248 male and 190 female patients (mean age 49.71 ± 13.20 years) treated with alitretinoin were collected. Of them, 43.2% had irritant contact dermatitis, 22.2% allergic contact dermatitis, 18.0% atopic dermatitis, 16.7% mixed (irritant/allergic) type of eczema. At 3 months, the 420 re-evaluated patients showed significantly reduced mTLSS and PGA (P < .0000001 vs baseline for both); PGA was clear/almost clear in 35.6% of cases. At 6 months, the 341 re-evaluated patients showed significant (P < .0000001) improvement of mTLSS and PGA vs baseline and 3 months (PGA clear/almost clear: 41.4%). Relapses occurred in 125 patients; 58 underwent an additional course of alitretinoin, with similarly good results. No relevant safety issues were reported; 86 patients experienced adverse effects, which forced 40 to prematurely stop treatment. The DECISA project results confirm the real-life efficacy, safety and tolerability of alitretinoin in the treatment of moderate to severe CHE refractory to standard topical therapies.

Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Hand Eczema

Hand eczema is a common condition associated with significantly impaired quality of life and high social and occupational costs. Managing hand eczema is particularly challenging for primary care and occupational health physicians as the condition has varying causes and both disease progression and response to treatment are difficult to predict. Early diagnosis and appropriate protective measures are essential to prevent progression to chronic eczema, which is much more difficult to treat. Appropriate referral to a specialist and opportune evaluation of the need for sick leave are crucial to the good management of these patients. These guidelines cover the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic hand eczema and highlight the role that primary care and occupational health physicians can play in the early management of this disease.

Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Hand Eczema: Successes and Key Challenges

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a common and burdensome inflammatory skin condition seen in up to 10% of the population, more often in high-risk occupational workers. Topical therapeutics comprise the standard of care, but up to 65% of cases do not resolve after treatment, and moderate-to-severe cases are often resistant to topical therapeutics and require systemic options instead. To date, there are no systemic therapeutics approved to treat CHE in the United States, but several drugs are under investigation as potential treatments for CHE. The primary focus of this review is on the novel therapeutics, topical and systemic, that are under investigation in recently completed or currently ongoing trials. This review also briefly outlines the existing treatments utilized for CHE, often with limited success or extensive adverse effects. CHE represents a major challenge for physicians and patients alike, and efforts to improve the minimally invasive diagnostic tools and treatment paradigms are ongoing. In the near future, CHE patients may benefit from new topical and systemic therapeutics that specifically target abnormally expressed immune markers.

Alitretinoin Compliance in Patients with Chronic Hand Eczema

Background

Oral alitretinoin is effective in the treatment of chronic hand eczema (CHE), and ≥12 weeks of alitretinoin treatment has been shown to be effective in Korean patients. However, in the real world, a considerable number of patients discontinue alitretinoin, which leads to treatment failure.

Objective

To evaluate the compliance rate of alitretinoin treatment and explore common reasons for poor compliance in patients with CHE in the real world.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of CHE patients treated with alitretinoin. We defined ‘poor-compliance’ as subjects who were treated with alitretinoin for <12 weeks and ‘good-compliance’ as subjects who were treated with alitretinoin for ≥12 weeks. We reviewed the demographics, dose, and duration of alitretinoin usage, efficacy, and reasons for poor compliance.

Results

A total of 137 subjects were enrolled, and 77 (56.2%) did not complete the 12-week treatment with alitretinoin. Among them, the non-improvement rate was significantly higher in the poor-compliance group than in the good-compliance group (p<0.01). The main reasons for the alitretinoin cessation in the poor-compliance group were insufficient response (40.8%), followed by high cost (34.7%), and adverse events (24.5%).

Conclusion

Alitretinoin appears the preferred long-term treatment option for CHE. Although there are complaints about late efficacy, cost, and side effects, following proper explanation, these should not justify discontinuation. Physicians need to recognize the reasons for poor compliance with alitretinoin for each patient and suggest continuing alitretinoin for the successful treatment of CHE.

Management of chronic hand and foot eczema. An Australia/New Zealand Clinical narrative

Chronic hand/foot eczemas are common, but treatment is often challenging, with widespread dissatisfaction over current available options. Detailed history is important, particularly with regard to potential exposure to irritants and allergens. Patch testing should be regarded as a standard investigation. Individual treatment outcomes and targets, including systemic therapy, should be discussed early with patients, restoring function being the primary goal, with clearing the skin a secondary outcome. Each new treatment, where appropriate, should be considered additive or overlapping to any previous therapy. Management extends beyond mere pharmacological or physical treatment, and requires an encompassing approach including removal or avoidance of causative factors, behavioural changes and social support. To date, there is little evidence to guide sequences or combinations of therapies. Moderately symptomatic patients (e.g. DLQI ≥ 10) should be started on a potent/super-potent topical corticosteroid applied once or twice per day for 4 weeks, with tapering to twice weekly application. If response is inadequate, consider phototherapy, and then a 12-week trial of a retinoid (alitretinoin or acitretin). Second line systemic treatments include methotrexate, ciclosporin and azathioprine. For patients presenting with severe symptomatic disease (DLQI ≥ 15), consider predniso(lo)ne 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day (or ciclosporin 3 - 5 mg/kg/day) for 4-6 weeks with tapering, and then treating as for moderate disease as above. In non-responders, botulinum toxin and/or iontophoresis, if associated with hyperhidrosis, may sometimes help. Some patients only respond to long-term systemic corticosteroids. The data on sequencing of newer agents, such as dupilumab or JAK inhibitors, are immature.

COVID‐19 und Auswirkungen auf dermatologische und allergologische Erkrankungen

Die durch das Coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 verursachte Krankheit COVID‐19 hat sich zu einer Pandemie entwickelt. Bei der Betrachtung von dermatologischen und allergologischen Krankheiten, die potenziell von COVID‐19 betroffen sind, stehen wir vor komplexen Herausforderungen, die Pathogenese und Beeinflussung verschiedener immunologischer Signalwege einschließen. Medizinische Behandlungen müssen daher im Zusammenhang mit dieser Infektion oft neu bewertet und in Frage gestellt werden.

Dieser Übersichtsartikel fasst den aktuellen Wissensstand zu COVID‐19 hinsichtlich der wichtigsten dermatologischen und allergologischen Erkrankungen zusammen. Es werden aber auch die medizinischen Bereiche beschrieben, für die keine ausreichenden Daten vorliegen. Unter Zusammenfassung der publizierten Daten und grundsätzlicher pathophysiologischer Überlegungen werden hier Schlussfolgerungen für das Management unserer Patienten während der Pandemie gezogen. Wir konzentrieren uns auf häufige Hauterkrankungen mit komplexer immunologischer Pathogenese: Psoriasis, Ekzeme einschließlich atopischer Dermatitis, Typ‐I‐Allergien, blasenbildende Autoimmundermatosen, Kollagenosen, Vaskulitiden und Hautkrebserkrankung. Da viele weitere Hauterkrankungen verwandte oder vergleichbare immunologische Reaktionsmuster aufweisen, können pathophysiologisch ähnliche entzündliche Dermatosen möglicherweise auch mit ähnlichen therapeutischen Überlegungen und Schlussfolgerungen während der Pandemie behandelt werden. Daher soll diese Übersicht Behandlungsempfehlungen auf der Basis bisher publizierter Daten und Empfehlungen zu Therapieentscheidungen auch über die hier diskutierten, häufigsten Erkrankungen hinaus liefern.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Hand Eczema in Adults

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide an important complement to physician-assessed clinical outcome measures in dermatologic diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and chronic hand eczema (CHE). AD and CHE are chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin conditions that often co-occur. While both diseases result in various signs and symptoms that are burdensome and can negatively affect patients’ lives, there may be distinct differences in the signs, symptoms, burden, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impact of these diseases. The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate PROMs used in studies of AD and CHE. The aim was to explore the assessment of key symptoms and impacts, and identify any gaps in the measures in use. A structured review of the PubMed database was conducted to identify PROMs used or developed for use in AD or CHE. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Pruritus/Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and the Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) were identified and reviewed in detail. With these measures, the AD and CHE symptoms and impacts most commonly evaluated in the literature include dermatology-related HRQOL in the domains of symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and adverse effects; pruritus; sleep disturbance; AD-specific symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, bleeding, and weeping/oozing); and CHE-specific symptoms (pain, itch, fissuring, redness, bleeding, and dryness). A review of regulatory labels of drugs approved for AD by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) found that, among the four measures reviewed, the Pruritus NRS was included in the FDA and EMA labels for dupilumab, the DLQI was included in the EMA labels for dupilumab and tacrolimus, and the POEM was included in the EMA label for dupilumab. Key symptoms of AD (e.g. itching, flaking, cracking) and CHE (e.g. pain, itching, fissuring) are increasingly being assessed with PROMs; however, primary endpoints in clinical trials are often based on clinician-reported outcome measures. As therapeutic strategies in dermatology are targeted at specific dermatologic symptoms and diseases affecting specific sites (e.g. CHE), future research should explore patients’ experiences with these symptoms and sites and the changes with treatment that are most meaningful to them.

COVID-19 and implications for dermatological and allergological diseases

COVID-19, caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has become pandemic. A further level of complexity opens up as soon as we look at diseases whose pathogenesis and therapy involve different immunological signaling pathways, which are potentially affected by COVID-19. Medical treatments must often be reassessed and questioned in connection with this infection. This article summarizes the current knowledge of COVID-19 in the light of major dermatological and allergological diseases. It identifies medical areas lacking sufficient data and draws conclusions for the management of our patients during the pandemic. We focus on common chronic inflammatory skin diseases with complex immunological pathogenesis: psoriasis, eczema including atopic dermatitis, type I allergies, autoimmune blistering and inflammatory connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, and skin cancers. Since several other inflammatory skin diseases display related or comparable immunological reactions, clustering of the various inflammatory dermatoses into different disease patterns may help with therapeutic decisions. Thus, following these patterns of skin inflammation, our review may supply treatment recommendations and thoughtful considerations for disease management even beyond the most frequent diseases discussed here.

Expression of retinoid receptors in hand eczema

BACKGROUND

Hand eczema is the most common occupational skin disease. The etiology is multifactorial. Systemic alitretinoin, a pan-retinoic receptor agonist, has proven efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic hand eczema; however, its precise mechanism of action in hand eczema is not fully understood.

AIMS

Assessment of the level of expression of retinoid receptors (RAR and RXR) in the skin of patients with hand eczema in an attempt to explain their possible role in the pathogenesis of the disease.

METHODS

Thirty patients with hand eczema and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included. Full clinical examination was done, and tissue levels of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoid x receptor (RXR) were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

RESULTS

The levels of RAR and RXR expression were significantly downregulated in the patient group compared to the control group; (P < 0.001) for both. In addition, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI) and the levels of RAR and RXR expression (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Deficient retinoid receptor expression has a primary role in the pathogenesis, clinical phenotype, and severity of hand eczema and sheds light on the mechanism of action of retinoids in the treatment of chronic hand eczema.