Quality of life evaluation in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) through the development of the QOLEB questionnaire: an EB-specific quality of life instrument

Facing the complex challenges of people with epidermolysis bullosa in Austria: a mixed methods study on burdens and helpful practices

BACKGROUND

With approximately 500 people affected in Austria, epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic skin disease reducing the quality of life of those affected and their relatives. The intensive efforts of the patient organisation DEBRA Austria during the last decades have led to a unique situation of those affected and their relatives, with increased support and broader knowledge about the disease in the general population. The aim of the study is to evaluate the current situation of patients and their relatives living in Austria, with a focus on burdens and helpful practices.

RESULTS

The mixed-methods study consisted of two parts: a qualitative interview study to identify psychosocial aspects of EB in those affected and their relatives, and a subsequent online survey to further assess those aspects in a larger sample, resulting in a total of n=78 Austrian participants. The impact of EB on the quality of life of EB patients and their relatives in Austria is related to the current health status, psychological burden, mobility, visibility, financial situation as well as job prospects. Personal and social resources and external support have a significant influence on the individual situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome is mapped to concrete implications regarding targeted support for EB patients and their relatives on an individual level and their needs in regard to the Austrian health care system.

"Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa" and "Epidermolysis Bullosa Burden of Disease": Italian translation, cultural adaptation, and pilot testing of two disease-specific questionnaires

BACKGROUND

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of skin fragility disorders characterized by blister formation following minor trauma. Four major types are distinguished based on the level of cleavage within the skin. Most EB forms present severely disabling cutaneous and systemic signs and symptoms. Management relies on daily time-consuming and distressing topical medications, and symptomatic treatment of systemic findings. Disease manifestations, symptoms, and daily care strongly affect patient and caregiver quality of life (QoL). To date, there are two validated EB-specific questionnaires, the "Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa" (QOLEB) and the "Epidermolysis Bullosa Burden of Disease" (EB-BoD) for the evaluation of patient and family disease burden, respectively. The aim of our study was to develop an Italian translation of the two questionnaires and to pilot-test them.

METHODS

The guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of health-related QoL measures were followed. Initially, two separate translations were generated for each questionnaire, and subsequently reconciled by an expert committee. This was followed by a back-translation process. The original texts and all translations underwent revision by the expert committee, resulting in definitive versions. The final versions were then tested in a pilot study involving cognitive debriefing in a group of 17 families, representative of all EB major types.

RESULTS

The translation and reconciliation process led to minor changes to obtain semantic/idiomatic/cultural equivalence of the Italian versions with the original ones and to reconcile the questions with the answer options. The cognitive debriefing process showed a good understanding and did not require text modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian versions of the QOLEB and EB-BoD provide valuable tools in everyday clinical practice of reference centers, and they allow the participation in multicenter international real-life observational studies as well as in controlled clinical trials. They enable the identification of disease-specific psychological and socioeconomic challenges for EB patients and their families, guiding targeted interventions to ensure appropriate and timely care.

Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the German Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare disease characterised by skin fragility and a wide variety of symptoms. The Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) score is an English 17-item EB-specific validated measurement tool with two dimensions: functioning and emotions. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to develop and validate a culturally adapted German QOLEB. The following steps were carried out: translation, expert evaluation, back translation, linguistic and cultural adaptation, sample-based psychometric testing and evaluation. Data analysis was performed with n = 46 patients across all EB types. The reliability and internal consistency of the translated German QOLEB were excellent (α = 0.901). Regarding convergent validity, the QOLEB correlated highly with the iscorEB (r = 0.879; p < 0.001). Structural similarity with the English original version was confirmed through exploratory factor analysis. In conclusion, the German QOLEB demonstrates internal reliability and construct validity and is suitable to assess the quality of life in German-speaking EB patients.

Health-related quality of life and clinical severity in people with epidermolysis bullosa - A proposal for assessing nutritional compromise by body mass index (Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disease characterised by skin fragility with blisters and erosions on the skin and/or mucous membranes. People with EB often experience several extracutaneous manifestations, including clinical and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) complications. Herein, we evaluate their HRQoL and clinical severity and propose an objective criterion for estimating nutritional compromise using the Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score (BEBS) tool.

METHODS

this series of cases included people with EB, monitored by a multi-professional team. Clinical severity was assessed with the BEBS, using body mass index ranges by age, as an objective proposal, to estimate the degree of nutritional compromise. To assess HRQoL, the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (individuals aged 4-16 years) and the Quality of Life Evaluation in Epidermolysis Bullosa - Brazilian Portuguese (individuals 17 years and over) were used.

RESULTS

of the nine individuals with recessive dystrophic EB (88.9 % female and 12.91 (SD = 11.71) years), the mean total BEBS score was 24.47 (SD = 12.80) points on a scale of 0 to 100 points. Six participants had significant nutritional compromise according to the proposed criteria. Five of the six participants evaluated for HRQoL reported experiencing some impact, with individuals aged 17 and over being more affected and with greater clinical severity.

CONCLUSIONS

individuals with greater clinical severity of EB experience a more significant impact on their HRQoL. The proposed quantitative criteria for assessing nutritional compromise may help standardise assessments by professionals monitoring the nutritional status of individuals with EB.

Consensus-based guidelines for the provision of palliative and end-of-life care for people living with epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a cluster of rare, genetic skin and mucosal fragility disorders with multi-system and secondary effects, in which blistering and erosions occur in response to friction/mechanical trauma. Considering the incurable and potentially life-limiting nature of the condition and the challenges posed by its symptoms, a palliative approach to EB-related care is necessary. However, knowledge and experience related to the provision of EB palliative care is minimal. Evidence-based, best care guidelines are needed to establish a base of knowledge for practitioners to prevent or ease suffering while improving comfort at all stages of the illness, not just the end of life.

METHODS

This consensus guideline (CG) was begun at the request of DEBRA International, an international organization dedicated to improvement of care, research, and dissemination of knowledge for EB patients, and represents the work of an international panel of medical experts in palliative care and EB, people living with EB, and people who provide care for individuals living with EB. Following a rigorous, evidence-based guideline development process, the author panel identified six clinical outcomes based on the results of a survey of people living with EB, carers, and medical experts in the field, as well as an exhaustive and systematic evaluation of literature. Recommendations for the best clinical provision of palliative care for people living with EB for each of the outcomes were reached through panel consensus of the available literature.

RESULTS

This article presents evidence-based recommendations for the provision of palliative healthcare services that establishes a base of knowledge and practice for an interdisciplinary team approach to ease suffering and improve the quality of life for all people living with EB. Any specific differences in the provision of care between EB subtypes are noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Because there is yet no cure for EB, this evidence-based CG is a means of optimizing and standardizing the IDT care needed to reduce suffering while improving comfort and overall quality of life for people living with this rare and often devastating condition.

Itch in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: findings of PEBLES, a prospective register study

BACKGROUND

Itch is common and distressing in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) but has not previously been studied in depth in different recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) subtypes.

OBJECTIVES

As part of a prospective register study of the natural history of RDEB we explored features of itch, medications used, and correlation with disease severity and quality of life.

METHODS

Fifty individuals with RDEB aged 8 years and above completed the Leuven Itch Scale (LIS) (total 243 reviews over a 7-year period). Data included itch frequency, severity, duration, distress, circumstances, consequences, itch surface area and medications for itch. The iscorEB disease severity score and the validated EB quality of life tool, QOLEB, were compared to LIS domains and analysed by RDEB subtype.

RESULTS

Itch was frequent, present in the preceding month in 93% of reviews. Itch severity and distress were significantly greater in severe (RDEB-S) and pruriginosa (RDEB-Pru) subtypes compared to intermediate RDEB (RDEB-I). Itch medications were reported in just over half of reviews including emollients, topical corticosteroids and antihistamines; the proportion of participants not using medication despite frequent pruritus suggests limited efficacy. In inversa RDEB (RDEB-Inv) and RDEB-I, LIS domains correlated with iscorEB and QOLEB. In contrast to previous studies, correlations were lacking in RDEB-S suggesting that global disease burden relatively reduces the contribution of itch.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive study of RDEB-associated itch highlights differences between RDEB subtypes, suggests an unmet need for effective treatments and could serve as control data for future clinical trials incorporating itch as an endpoint.

The impact of epidermolysis bullosa on the family and healthcare practitioners: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an inherited genodermatosis that results in mucocutaneous fragility. There is a lack of data on the impact of this disease on parents. There are no studies on the impact on siblings and few on healthcare professionals in dealing with this devastating disease.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed using the Arksey and O'Malley and PRISMA-ScR framework. Twenty-seven articles were reviewed, and a data-charting sheet was formulated.

RESULTS

Parents make great sacrifices and are resilient in caring for their sick children but are at risk of depression. Siblings play a vital role in caring for their siblings, but their needs may be overlooked because the main focus is on the sibling with EB. Healthcare professionals may suffer burnout and compassion fatigue in caring for patients and their families with EB.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive care of the family and the awareness of the challenges experienced by healthcare professionals is essential to the holistic care of a patient with EB.

Validation and Repeatability of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

PURPOSE

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a devastating condition that causes painful corneal abrasions and vision loss. Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI) for the first time captures and quantifies EB-specific assessment of ocular symptoms and activities of daily living scales. This survey will become critical in developing new interventions on patients' quality of life.

METHODS

Three-part set of the EB-EDI baseline, EB-EDI interval, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) survey was distributed to 92 patients with DEB who previously reported eye symptoms on previous surveys. It was then posted online through several EB patient organizations. We compared the EB-EDI with the gold standard OSDI and examined the repeatability of the EB-EDI over a 7- to 15-day interval.

RESULTS

Of the 45 individuals who initially responded, 30 of 45 (67%) completed the surveys sent 7 to 15 days later. The age of participants ranged from 6 to 51 years (mean 21 ± 15 years), and 60% (18 of 30) of participants were younger than 18 years. The overall Cronbach alpha values for the subscales of EB-EDI baseline and interval tools presented a good internal consistency (≥0.7). From 2 visits, the domain scores of EB-EDI baseline (0.94) and interval tools (0.83) were shown to have excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.8). By comparison, OSDI had the intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.72 ± 0.11. The convergent validation analysis showed that correlations between the domain scores of EB-EDI baseline and interval tools and the subscales of the OSDI reached the hypothesized strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a 30-person repeated-measures study, we found that the EB-EDI has excellent reliability and validity specifically in patients with DEB.

Understanding the socioeconomic costs of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in Europe: a costing and health-related quality of life study

Background

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a family of rare genetic dermatological conditions. Recent evidence indicated that in addition to its detrimental implications on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL), there are substantial socioeconomic cost implications, especially regarding direct non-medical costs. This study aims to understand the burden of dystrophic EB (DEB) in Europe, using a primary EB patient-level dataset.

Methods

A bottom-up, cross-sectional, study design was adopted for non-institutionalised patients diagnosed with EB who received outpatient care across EU5 countries: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. A prevalence-based approach was used to estimate resource utilisation from a societal perspective, including direct (medical and non-medical) and indirect costs for patients and caregivers. Patient and caregiver outcomes were obtained using the EQ-5D questionnaire.

Results

A sample of 91 DEB patients was analysed. Overall, average EU5 annual cost per patient was estimated at €53,359, ranging from €18,783 (France) to €79,405 (Germany). Average EU5 annual direct medical costs were estimated at €8357 (15.7% of total), ranging from €5658 (France) to €12,576 (Germany); average direct non-medical costs were estimated at €41,353 (77.5% of total), ranging from €11,961 (France) to €57,000 (Germany); and average indirect costs were estimated at €3649 (6.8% of total), ranging from €1025 (Italy) to €9930 (United Kingdom). Costs varied across patients with different disability but also between children and adults. The mean EQ-5D index score for adult DEB patients ranged between 0.304 (United Kingdom) and 0.541 (Germany), with an EU5 average of 0.456, whereas the mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale score ranged between 47.5 (Germany) and 70.0 (France), with an EU5 average of 61.9. Limitations included potential patient selection bias, recall bias, and exclusion of bandaging and related costs.

Conclusions

The study revealed a substantial socioeconomic burden for DEB in Europe, attributable mostly to high direct non-medical costs, with the majority of patients requiring support from caregivers at home. Compared to the average economic burden of the overall EB patient population, costs for DEB patients are higher across all components of direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02419-1.

Patients' and parents' experiences during wound care of epidermolysis bullosa from a dyadic perspective: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa is a rare, often severe, genetic disorder characterized by fragility of the skin and mucous membranes. Despite the important role of parents during wound care, an essential factor in adapting to this disease, studies focusing on the parent-child relationship during wound care are scarce. The current study is aimed at addressing this gap.

METHODS

A quantitative study among 31 children (n = 21 ≤ 17 years; n = 10 17-25 years) and 34 parents (including 27 parent-child dyads) was conducted to examine the relationship between pain, itch, anxiety, positive and negative feelings, and coping strategies assessed with the newly developed Epidermolysis Bullosa Wound Care List. The majority of the analyses were descriptive and the results were interpreted qualitatively because of the small sample size.

RESULTS

Children and parents both showed significantly more positive (i.e. 'protected', 'proud', 'calm', 'connected to each other' and 'courageous') than negative feelings (i.e. 'helpless', 'angry', 'insecure', 'guilty', 'gloomy' and 'sad') during wound care, with parents reporting both feelings more than children. The more children experienced pain, the more they were anxious, had negative feelings, were inclined to use distraction, to postpone wound care and to cry. The more parents experienced feelings (either positive or negative), the more likely they sought distraction. With regard to child-parent dyads the results showed that the more children expressed anxiety, the more parents experienced negative feelings. Furthermore, those who reported more negative feelings were more likely to hide their feelings, while those who reported more positive feelings were more inclined to show their feelings. Pain, itch and anxiety in the child were associated with more distraction or postponement of wound care by the parent.

CONCLUSION

This study underlines the importance of paying attention to the relationship between feelings and coping strategies in child-parent dyads in the management of pain and anxiety during wound care. Further research could provide more insight how these feelings and coping strategies are related to the psychological well-being of both the child and the parent in the short term as well as in the long term.

A prospective short-term study to evaluate methodologies for the assessment of disease extent, impact, and wound evolution in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Standardized assessments for dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) are needed. This prospective, multicenter, 4-week, observational study was designed to evaluate DEB assessments for suitability as clinical trial endpoints.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed DEB diagnosis and ≥ 5 measurable wounds were included. The primary outcome was change from baseline in wound surface area (WSA) of 5 selected wounds by 3-dimensional imaging. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in clinician global assessment (CGA) of WSA, wound characteristics, disease-related questionnaires and instruments (disease severity, quality of life [QoL], pain and disability, and itch), and tolerability of procedures.

RESULTS

Of 30 enrolled patients, 29 completed the study (of whom, 28 had recessive DEB). Median age was 17.8 years (range, 3.8-58.7). All patients developed new or recurrent wounds during the 4-week study. Of the wounds selected at baseline, 45/150 (30.0%) healed by week 2; an additional 38 healed by week 4, while 8 of those healed at week 2 had recurred by week 4 for a total of 75/150 (50.0%) healed wounds at week 4. Mean values for WSA, CGA, and disease-related questionnaire and instrument scores remained steady during this 4-week observational study. Of the 10 disease-related questionnaires and instruments assessed, the scores for the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) did not substantially overlap between moderate and severe disease. Between mild and moderate disease, only the EBDASI scores did not substantially overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

These results stress the dynamic nature of wounds, even during a 4-week period of observation, and suggest that a combination of clinician-assessed outcomes and patient-/caregiver-reported outcomes is needed to provide a comprehensive assessment of DEB severity and impact. In addition, these results support the use of EBDASI and iscorEB to monitor disease severity as both produced scores that did not substantially overlap between disease severity strata. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02178969 . Registered 4 June 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02178969 .

A global, cross-sectional survey of patient-reported outcomes, disease burden, and quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa simplex

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) comprises a group of rare, blistering genodermatoses. Prior work has been limited by small sample sizes, and much remains unexplored about the disease burden and health-related quality of life (QOL) of patients with EBS. The aim of this study was to characterize the most common patient-reported clinical manifestations and the health-related impact of QOL in EBS, and to examine differences in disease burden by age.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) or their caregivers completed a one-time online survey administered by EBCare, an international online EB registry. Survey data from respondents self-reporting a diagnosis of EBS were analyzed for clinical and wound manifestations, medication use, and QOL (using Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa [QOLEB] scores). Differences across age groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

There were 214 survey respondents with EBS. The mean age was 32.8 years (standard deviation = 19.2). Many respondents reported blisters (93%), recurrent wounds (89%), pain (74%), chronic wounds (59%), itch (55%), and difficulty walking (44%). Mean QOLEB score was 14.7 (standard deviation = 7.5) indicating a "moderate" impact on QOL, and 12% of respondents required regular use of opiates. Findings were consistent in subgroup analyses restricted to respondents with diagnostic confirmation via genetic testing or skin biopsy (n = 63 of 214). Age-stratified analyses revealed differences in disease burden: younger respondents were more likely to self-report severe disease (24% vs. 19% vs. 5% for respondents aged 0-9 vs. 10-17 vs. 18 + , p = 0.001), failure to thrive (9% vs. 15% vs. 3%, p = 0.02), and use of gastrostomy tubes (15% vs. 12% vs. 1%, p < 0.001) and topical antibiotics (67% vs. 69% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), while older respondents were more likely to be overweight or obese (6% vs. 0% vs. 51%, p < 0.001) and have difficulty walking (24% vs. 46% vs. 48%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest international cross-sectional survey of EBS patients conducted, respondents reported extensive disease burden including significant wounding, pain, itch, difficulty walking, and impact on QOL. Age stratified disease manifestations. These findings suggest significant unmet need, and treatment and counseling for EBS patients should consider age-specific differences.

Transcultural Validation of a Spanish Version of the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a relatively infrequent genodermatosis for which there is still no cure, and which impacts the quality of life of those that are affected by it. The Quality of Life evaluation in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QoLEB) questionnaire was specifically developed for English-speaking persons with EB.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake the transcultural adaptation and analysis of the psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the QoLEB questionnaire.

METHOD

We designed an observational study to implement the process of translation and validation of the scale in accordance with World Health Organisation guidelines. We assessed the content validity of the Spanish version with the participation of 33 adult patients who presented with four principal subtypes of EB. The subjects were examined and evaluated using the QoLEB and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires.

RESULTS

The Spanish version of the QoLEB displayed excellent internal consistency and content validity, α = 0.91. Test-retest reliability was likewise excellent (ps = 0.93), as was the reliability among subtypes (range ps = 0.82-0.93). The functional part of the QoLEB correlated well with the SF-36 physical component summary (ps = 0.70). The emotional QoLEB was moderately correlated with the SF-36 mental component summary (ps = 0.49). Significant discriminant validity existed between the global score of the questionnaire (p = 0.033) and the functional scale (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish version of the QoLEB questionnaire can be recommended for use in any subsequent studies seeking to assess the efficacy of possible treatments and care programmes in this group.

Reducing anxiety and preventing trauma in pediatric epidermolysis bullosa

Although dermatologists are well-trained in the medical management of complex skin disease, psychosocial care often exceeds a dermatologist's skillset. We aim to elucidate major factors to consider in the comprehensive management of pediatric epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and provide care recommendations. There are many types of trauma a child with EB may experience, from social to psychological to medical. We include information on trauma-informed care and advice for the dermatologist and multidisciplinary team regarding patient-centered and family-centered approaches to recognizing and reducing anxiety and trauma in EB patients.

Patient Quality of Life Improvement in Bullous Disease: A Review of Primary Literature and Considerations for the Clinician

Autoimmune and inherited bullous disorders are rare skin diseases that may have a profound negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Common symptoms include pain, pruritus, and scarring, and complications may result in the loss of the ability to perform daily tasks. Diagnosis may have a negative psychological impact, and ongoing management may require a significant allocation of time and resources by both patients and providers. To provide patient-centered care, consideration of these factors is of utmost importance for the dermatologist treating patients with bullous disorders. Herein, we present a review of the primary literature evaluating QOL in autoimmune and inherited bullous disorders, including pemphigus, pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa, and Hailey-Hailey disease.

Assessing the quality of life in the families of patients with epidermolysis bullosa: The mothers as main caregivers

Background

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an uncommon group of inherited disorders characterized by skin blistering after friction or mechanical trauma. EB affects patients and their families physically, socially, and emotionally.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the family quality of life of these patients using the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) questionnaire.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled caregivers of patients with EB registered at the Molecular Dermatology Research Center, affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, up to 2020. Participants filled out a demographic data collection form and the FDLQI questionnaire. The data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 22.

Results

Overall, 80 participants, consisting of 65 mothers (81.2%) and 15 fathers (18.7%) as primary caregivers, were enrolled in this study. The average FDLQI score was 19.88 ± 4.71. The FDLQI scores of caregivers of patients with EB simplex was significantly lower than scores observed in those with other types of EB (p < .001). There was a significant positive association between the number of patients with EB in the family and FDLQI score (p = .049). FDLQI scores were lower in caregiving mothers who had a higher education (p < .001) and those who were employed (p < .001).

Conclusion

Family quality of life is affected in patients with EB. Families with lower socioeconomic status and unemployed caregivers require special attention. More studies are needed to determine the parameters involved in the quality of life of patients with EB and their families.

Clinical trial of ABCB5+ mesenchymal stem cells for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare, devastating, and life-threatening inherited skin fragility disorder that comes about due to a lack of functional type VII collagen, for which no effective therapy exists. ABCB5⁺ dermal mesenchymal stem cells (ABCB5⁺ MSCs) possess immunomodulatory, inflammation-dampening, and tissue-healing capacities. In a Col7a1^–/– mouse model of RDEB, treatment with ABCB5⁺ MSCs markedly extended the animals’ lifespans.

METHODS

In this international, multicentric, single-arm, phase I/IIa clinical trial, 16 patients (aged 4–36 years) enrolled into 4 age cohorts received 3 i.v. infusions of 2 × 10⁶ ABCB5⁺ MSCs/kg on days 0, 17, and 35. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks regarding efficacy and 12 months regarding safety.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, statistically significant median (IQR) reductions in the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index activity (EBDASI activity) score of 13.0% (2.9%–30%; P = 0.049) and the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcome of Research for Epidermolysis Bullosa clinician (iscorEB‑c) score of 18.2% (1.9%–39.8%; P = 0.037) were observed. Reductions in itch and pain numerical rating scale scores were greatest on day 35, amounting to 37.5% (0.0%–42.9%; P = 0.033) and 25.0% (–8.4% to 46.4%; P = 0.168), respectively. Three adverse events were considered related to the cell product: 1 mild lymphadenopathy and 2 hypersensitivity reactions. The latter 2 were serious but resolved without sequelae shortly after withdrawal of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrates good tolerability, manageable safety, and potential efficacy of i.v. ABCB5⁺ MSCs as a readily available disease-modifying therapy for RDEB and provides a rationale for further clinical evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03529877; EudraCT 2018-001009-98.

FUNDING

The trial was sponsored by RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG. Contributions by NYF and MHF to this work were supported by the NIH/National Eye Institute (NEI) grants RO1EY025794 and R24EY028767.

Hologene 5: A Phase II/III Clinical Trial of Combined Cell and Gene Therapy of Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of devastating genetic diseases characterized by skin and mucosal fragility and formation of blisters, which develop either spontaneously or in response to minor mechanical trauma. There is no definitive therapy for any form of EB. Intermediate junctional EB (JEB) caused by mutations in the gene LAMB3 has been the first genetic skin disease successfully tackled by ex vivo gene therapy. Here, we present a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II/III study that aims at confirming the efficacy of Hologene 5, a graft consisting of cultured transgenic keratinocytes and epidermal stem cells and meant to combine cell and gene therapy for the treatment of LAMB3-related JEB. Autologous clonogenic keratinocytes will be isolated from patients’ skin biopsies, genetically corrected with a gamma-retroviral vector (γRV) carrying the full-length human LAMB3 cDNA and plated onto a fibrin support (144cm²). The transgenic epidermis will be transplanted onto surgically prepared selected skin areas of at least six JEB patients (four pediatric and two adults). Evaluation of clinical efficacy will include, as primary endpoint, a combination of clinical parameters, such as percentage of re-epithelialization, cellular, molecular, and functional parameters, mechanical stress tests, and patient-reported outcome (PRO), up to 12months after transplantation. Safety and further efficacy endpoints will also be assessed during the clinical trial and for additional 15years in an interventional non-pharmacological follow-up study. If successful, this clinical trial would provide a therapeutic option for skin lesions of JEB patients with LAMB3 mutations and pave the way to a combined cell and gene therapy platform tackling other forms of EB and different genodermatoses.

Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT Number: 2018-000261-36.

Hindi translation and validation of quality of life score in Indian patients with epidermolysis bullosa; and its correlation with the clinical severity assessment scores: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) has not been evaluated in Indian patients having epidermolysis bullosa (EB).

AIMS

The aims of the study were to measure health-related QoL in Indian patients having EB using the quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa (QoLEB) questionnaire, and to find its correlation with clinically measured disease severity.

METHODS

In this observational cross-sectional study, the QoLEB questionnaire was translated from English to Hindi (QoLEB-Hin) and culturally adapted without a change in concept following standard guidelines. QoLEB-Hin and three clinical scores that have been independently validated in EB, that is, Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa severity score (BEBs), Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes of Research for Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) and Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI), were administered to EB patients/their parents in the presence of an expert. This was followed by validity and correlation studies.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were recruited (19-females, 35-males; median age 5 years, range 0.025-36 years and 12 patients with an age >13 years). The parents answered the questions for 42 patients (age <13 years). Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa was diagnosed in 32 (59.2%) patients (dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa [DDEB]-19 [35.2%] and recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa [RDEB]-13 [24.1%]). Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) and epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) were each diagnosed in 11 (20.4%) patients. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of QoLEB-Hin score of all epidermolysis bullosa patients was 11.3 ± 7.6 (range 0-28; median and interquartile range [IQR], 10, 10) and reflected an overall moderate degree of affliction on QoL of patients. Mean ± SD of QoLEB-Hin scores for EBS, JEB, DDEB and RDEB were 5.4 ± 3.7 (range, 1-13; median and IQR, 6, 6), 11 ± 6.2 (range, 1-22; median and IQR, 10, 6), 9 ± 5.7 (range, 0-19; median and IQR, 10, 10) and 20.1 ± 6.4 (range, 12-28; median and IQR, 19, 12.5), respectively (P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.946 was obtained for all items indicating excellent internal consistency and reliability. Mean sample adequacy was 0.91; absolute fit based off diagonal values was 0.99; indices root mean square error of approximation and root mean square residual were 0.04 and 0.05, respectively, and Tucker Lewis index was >1 indicating overfit. The mean time taken to complete the questionnaire was 6.1 min (range, 6-8 min). QoLEB-Hin correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with BEBs (ρ = 0.79), iscorEB (ρ= 0.63) and EBDASI (ρ = 0.77). Three multiple linear regression models were used to ascertain the strength of relationship between QoL-Hin, and BEBs, iSCOREB and EBDASI, respectively, after adjusting for age, gender and disease subtype. The EBDASI clinical score accounted for approximately 74% (R2 = 0.736, P < 0.001) of the variability in QOL-Hin, as compared to 73% and 55% by BEBs (R2 = 0.731, P < 0.001) and iscorEB (R2 = 0.545, P < 0.001), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Parents filled out the questionnaires for many patients and probably led to an overall moderate degree of affliction of QoL. Comparison with Dermatology Life Quality Index and other QoL scores were not done in this study. Furthermore, the scoring was done at one point in time, and test-retest measurements could not be performed.

CONCLUSION

This study validated QoLEB-Hin in an Indian population finding an overall moderate reduction in QoL due to EB. Maximally affected QoL was seen in patients with RDEB. Furthermore, QoLEB-Hin had a variable positive correlation and association with all clinical severity assessment scores.

A systematic literature review of the disease burden in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a genetic collagen disorder characterized by skin fragility leading to blistering, wounds, and scarring. There are currently no approved curative therapies. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive literature review of the disease burden caused by RDEB.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Observational and interventional studies on the economic, clinical, or humanistic burden of RDEB were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies were included in the review. Patients had considerable wound burden, with 60% reporting wounds covering more than 30% of their body. Increases in pain and itch were seen with larger wound size. Chronic wounds were larger and more painful than recurrent wounds. Commonly reported symptoms and complications included lesions and blistering, anemia, nail dystrophy and loss, milia, infections, musculoskeletal contractures, strictures or stenoses, constipation, malnutrition/nutritional problems, pseudosyndactyly, ocular manifestations, and dental caries. Many patients underwent esophageal dilation (29-74%; median dilations, 2-6) and gastrostomy tube placement (8-58%). In the severely affected population, risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was 76% and mortality from SCC reached 84% by age 40. Patients with RDEB experienced worsened quality of life (QOL), decreased functioning and social activities, and increased pain and itch when compared to other EB subtypes, other skin diseases, and the general population. Families of patients reported experiencing high rates of burden including financial burden (50-54%) and negative impact on private life (79%). Direct medical costs were high, though reported in few studies; annual payer-borne total medical costs in Ireland were $84,534 and annual patient-borne medical costs in Korea were $7392. Estimated annual US costs for wound dressings ranged from $4000 to $245,000. Patients spent considerable time changing dressings: often daily (13-54% of patients) with up to three hours per change (15-40%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RDEB and their families/caregivers experience significant economic, humanistic, and clinical burden. Further research is needed to better understand the costs of disease, how the burden of disease changes over the patient lifetime and to better characterize QOL impact, and how RDEB compares with other chronic, debilitating disorders.

Engaging the Voices of Children: A Scoping Review of How Children and Adolescents Are Involved in the Development of Quality-of-Life-Related Measures

OBJECTIVES

Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly recommended to guide patient care, develop and evaluate interventions, and modify health systems. However, not enough is known about whether and how children and adolescents, as "experts" in their own health and quality of life (QoL), are being engaged in the development of instruments. Our goals in this review were (1) to identify all QoL-related instruments that have included children and/or adolescents in the development of questionnaire content, including identification of themes and items; and (2) to report how this was done; and (3) to highlight those that used qualitative methods.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched for child- or adolescent-completed QoL-related instruments, supplemented by hand-searching of relevant reviews until 2020. Original development papers were identified and retrieved when possible, from which instrument characteristics and details of qualitative development methods were extracted.

RESULTS

We identified 445 instruments, of which 88 used qualitative methods for content development. Interviews and focus groups were the most common methods. A variety of play techniques were used to engage the child and adolescent participants. The specific criteria for the inclusion of children and adolescents (age, developmental stage, duration, and nonclinical location) varied considerably.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers frequently involve children and adolescents in qualitative methods when developing QoL-related measures; however, there is little information about the methods used. Better reporting of methodology, improved dissemination of methods guidelines, and research into optimal ways of including children and adolescents in the process of instrument development would be useful.

A comparison study of outcome measures for epidermolysis bullosa: Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes of Research for Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB)

Background

The success of clinical trials in Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) is dependent upon the availability of a valid and reliable scoring tool that can accurately assess and monitor disease severity. The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes of Research for Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) were independently developed and validated against the Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score but have never been directly compared.

Objective

To compare the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the EBDASI and iscorEB scoring tools.

Methods

An observational cohort study was conducted in 15 patients with EB. Each patient was evaluated using the EBDASI and iscorEB-clinician scoring tools by 6 dermatologists with expertise in EB. Quality of life was assessed using the iscorEB-patient and Quality of Life in EB measures.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater reliability were 0.942 for the EBDASI and 0.852 for the iscorEB-clinician. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater reliability was 0.99 for both scores. The two tools demonstrated strong convergent validity with each other.

Conclusion

Both scoring tools demonstrate excellent reliability. The EBDASI appears to better discriminate between EB types and disease severities.

Supporting sexuality for people living with epidermolysis bullosa: clinical practice guidelines

This article presents evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the provision of healthcare services to address sexuality for people living with epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Currently, a lack of EB-specific research limits these services to sexual health assessment and intervention strategies designed for the general population. Due to the unique challenges of EB, a rare skin-fragility condition causing blistering responses to minor skin trauma and other systemic and secondary complications, condition-specific strategies are needed to support people with EB in achieving valued sexual lifestyles. This CPG represents the work of an international panel comprised of thirteen members including a medical doctor, nurses, psychologists, a social worker, an occupational therapist, and patient population involvement members living with EB. It describes the development of EB-specific recommendations for two primary domains of assessment and intervention related to sexuality: psychosocial and mechanical. Following a rigorous evidence-based guideline development process, this CPG establishes the first internationally actionable clinical practice recommendations for sexuality-related assessment and intervention for this population. Future research priorities are identified. Supplemental materials included provide additional support to clinicians in developing the necessary understanding and skills to promote equity and efficacy in this care domain.

An analysis of the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patients have multiple risk factors for osteoporosis. There is limited literature describing the prevalence of bone health in EB, particularly in adults and less severe EB types.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of osteopenia or osteoporosis in EB patients from the Australasian Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry (AEBR).

METHODS

Of 417 AEBR patients, 72 underwent a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. Bone mineral density (BMD) T and Z-scores, EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI), and Quality of Life in EB (QOLEB) scores were obtained.

RESULTS

T-scores of RDEB patients were significantly lower than the diagnostic cut-off value for osteopenia. EBDASI and QOLEB scores were inversely correlated with Z-scores. The prevalence of osteoporosis in adults was 75% in severe EB types (RDEB and JEB). In adults with less severe types (EBS and DDEB), the prevalence of osteopenia was 50% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study of osteoporosis in EB to date and the first to include adult patients with EBS. The high prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia identified in these patients warrants larger, collaborative international studies. Nevertheless, EB patients with high disease severity and QOL scores, irrespective of type, should receive early osteoporosis screening and prophylaxis.

Participatory co-design of patient-reported outcome indicators and N-of-1 evaluation of a dressing glove for Epidermolysis bullosa

OBJECTIVE

In autosomal recessive dystrophic Epidermolysis bullosa, repeat blistering results in finger webbing and severe contractures of the hands. The aim of this study was to codesign patient-reported outcome indicators for hand therapy with patients, carers and clinicians, and use these to proof-of-concept test a novel dressing glove for recessive dystrophic Epidermolysis bullosa, with cost analysis.

METHOD

Qualitative interviews and focus groups with patients and carers generated content for the indicators. Validity and reliability were established through expert review, piloting and consensus between patients, carers and clinicians. The indicators were self-reported by patients before and while wearing the dressing glove in an N-of-1 study. Time for dressing changes and use of conventional products were also self-reported.

RESULTS

A total of 11 indicators were initially generated from the thematic analysis. Expert review, piloting and consensus involved six patients, five carers and eight clinicians (total n=19). Participants agreed 14 indicators, covering hand skin condition (n=4), webbing between the digits (n=4), experiences of wearing and changing dressings (n=2), hand function (n=2), wrist function (n=1) and hand pain (n=1). In Phase 3, 12 patients scored indicators before wearing the gloves and four patients completed scoring while wearing the gloves. Statistically significant improvements between pre-glove and with-glove periods were found for most participants' experience scores. Skin appearance also improved for most participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The indicators generated useful data, differentiation between scores and participants demonstrating proof-of-concept for patients with recessive dystrophic Epidermolysis bullosa who could wear the dressing gloves. The indicators are being used in routine practice, supporting clinical follow up, commercialisation and regulatory governance of the dressing glove.

Clinical practice guidelines: Oral health care for children and adults living with epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genetic disorder characterized by skin fragility and unique oral features.

AIMS

To provide (a) a complete review of the oral manifestations in those living with each type of inherited EB, (b) the current best practices for managing oral health care of people living with EB, (c) the current best practices on dental implant-based oral rehabilitation for patients with recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB), and (d) the current best practice for managing local anesthesia, principles of sedation, and general anesthesia for children and adults with EB undergoing dental treatment.

METHODS

Systematic literature search, panel discussion including clinical experts and patient representatives from different centers around the world, external review, and guideline piloting.

RESULTS

This article has been divided into five chapters: (i) general information on EB for the oral health care professional, (ii) systematic literature review on the oral manifestations of EB, (iii) oral health care and dental treatment for children and adults living with EB-clinical practice guidelines, (iv) dental implants in patients with RDEB-clinical practice guidelines, and (v) sedation and anesthesia for adults and children with EB undergoing dental treatment-clinical practice guidelines. Each chapter provides recommendations on the management of the different clinical procedures within dental practice, highlighting the importance of patient-clinician partnership, impact on quality of life, and the importance of follow-up appointments. Guidance on the use on nonadhesive wound care products and emollients to reduce friction during patient care is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral soft and hard tissue manifestations of inherited EB have unique patterns of involvement associated with each subtype of the condition. Understanding each subtype individually will help the professionals plan long-term treatment approaches.

Family burden of children suffering from epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Living with a rare disease has profound effects on the patient's life and that of their entire family, with practical and psychosocial consequences. This is particularly true when the patient is a child. The principal aim of this study was to measure the family burden in Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the possible correlation between family burden and the severity of EB.

METHODS

A sample of 50 families with one or two children affected by EB were recruited between January 2016 and February 2017 to answer a 20-item questionnaire - the EB Burden of Disease (EB-BoD) - developed and validated to assess the family burden of children with EB.

RESULTS

The presence of a child with EB may have profound negative implications on several different areas of daily life. In particular, the results demonstrate important differences between the different subtypes of epidermolysis bullosa regarding most of the categories considered by the questionnaire. For three categories out of four (family life, child's life, economic and social impact), a higher score is observed for children with the more debilitating forms of EB: recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) and junctional EB (JEB).

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to work with patients and their families to identify and strengthen adaptive and coping behaviors. That is possible only through the synergistic working of a multidisciplinary team made up of experienced doctors, psychologists, and social workers while in contact with patient Associations.

The quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa (EB-QoL) questionnaire: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation into the Farsi language

Background

Defining the quality of life in the patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is important in patient care and management. Evaluation of quality of life requires a valid and reliable scale. The Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB-QoL) questionnaire, which is an English 17-item questionnaire, has emerged as a useful tool for assessing the quality of life in the patients with EB.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the EB-QoL questionnaire among a group of Iranian patients with EB.

Methods

The Farsi version of the EB-QoL questionnaire was finalized after translation and back-translation. From the 100 patients with EB invited to participate in the study, 83 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 83%). Subsequently, the content validity and construct validity of the questionnaire were assessed. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Moreover, the correlation between EB-QoL scores and EB severity scores (based on the Birmingham Epidermolysis bullosa severity score scale) was evaluated.

Results

A total of 83 patients (40 male and 43 female) with a median age of 15 years (interquartile range, 9–24 years) and an age range between 3 and 43 years were enrolled in this study. Mean ± standard deviation scores from the EB-QoL questionnaire were 43.7 ± 9.9. The translated EB-QoL questionnaire showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.90) and adequate item-total correlation. Also, there was a significant correlation between EB-QoL and EB severity scores (r = 0.39; p < .001).

Conclusion

The Farsi version of EB-QoL questionnaire has acceptable validity and reliability. Thus, the questionnaire can be used for future studies to assess the quality of life among Iranian patients with EB.

Epidermolysis bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an inherited, heterogeneous group of rare genetic dermatoses characterized by mucocutaneous fragility and blister formation, inducible by often minimal trauma. A broad phenotypic spectrum has been described, with potentially severe extracutaneous manifestations, morbidity and mortality. Over 30 subtypes are recognized, grouped into four major categories, based predominantly on the plane of cleavage within the skin and reflecting the underlying molecular abnormality: EB simplex, junctional EB, dystrophic EB and Kindler EB. The study of EB has led to seminal advances in our understanding of cutaneous biology. To date, pathogenetic mutations in 16 distinct genes have been implicated in EB, encoding proteins influencing cellular integrity and adhesion. Precise diagnosis is reliant on correlating clinical, electron microscopic and immunohistological features with mutational analyses. In the absence of curative treatment, multidisciplinary care is targeted towards minimizing the risk of blister formation, wound care, symptom relief and specific complications, the most feared of which - and also the leading cause of mortality - is squamous cell carcinoma. Preclinical advances in cell-based, protein replacement and gene therapies are paving the way for clinical successes with gene correction, raising hopes amongst patients and clinicians worldwide.

Losartan as disease modulating therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

A 6-year-old child with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, confirmed by history, clinical exam, and antigen mapping, was treated with losartan with reduction in the blistering and better quality of life.

Profiling trial burden and patients' attitudes to improve clinical research in epidermolysis bullosa

Background

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises inherited mechanobullous dermatoses with considerable morbidity and mortality. While current treatments are symptomatic, a growing number of innovative therapeutic compounds are evaluated in clinical trials. Clinical research in rare diseases like EB, however, faces many challenges, including sample size requirements and recruitment failures. The objective of this study was to determine attitudes of EB patients towards clinical research and trial participation as well as the assessment of contextual motivating and discouraging factors in an effort to support patient-centered RD trial designing.

Methods

A 53-items questionnaire was handed over to EB patients (of all types and ages) in contact with the EB House Austria, a designated national center of expertise for EB care. Main categories included level of interest in and personal knowledge about clinical studies, pros/cons for participation and extent of individual expenses considered acceptable for participation in a clinical study. Descriptive subgroup analysis was calculated with SPSS 20.0 and Microsoft Excel.

Results

Thirty-six individuals (mean age 25.7 years), diagnosed for recessive dystrophic EB (36.1%), EB simplex (33.4%), junctional EB (8.3%), dominant dystrophic EB (2.8%) and acral peeling syndrome (2.8%) participated. Motivation for participation in and the desire to increase personal knowledge about clinical trials were (outmost) high in 57.2 and 66.7%, respectively. Altruism was the major motivating factor, followed by hope that alleviation of the own symptoms can be achieved. The greatest hurdle was travel distance, followed by concerns about possible adverse reactions. Patients diagnosed for severe subgroups (RDEB, JEB) were more impaired by the extent of scheduled invasive investigations and possible adverse reactions of the study medication. Patients with generally milder EB forms and older patients were accepting more frequent outpatient study visits, blood takes, skin biopsies and inpatient admissions in association with trial participation.

Conclusions

This study provides additional indications to better determine and address attitudes towards clinical research among EB patients as well as guidance to improve clinical trial protocols for patient centricity.

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A global cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

A spectrum of skin disease severity exists in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB).

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the patient-reported outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with RDEB.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patients with RDEB surveyed through the global EBCare Registry. Patient-reported outcomes included skin disease severity, wound characteristics, pain, itch, extracutaneous symptoms, and medications. QOL was measured by using the validated Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients with RDEB reported 1226 wounds (937 recurrent wounds and 289 chronic open wounds). Overall skin disease severity was self-reported as mild (26%; 22/83), moderate (48%; 40/83), or severe (25%; 21/83). Worsening skin disease severity was significantly associated with larger wounds, increased opiate use, anemia, gastrostomy tube use, infections, osteoporosis, and squamous cell carcinoma. Larger wound size was associated with worse quality of life scores.

LIMITATIONS

All data were self-reported from an online epidermolysis bullosa patient registry.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a significant correlation between larger wound size with worsening skin disease severity and quality of life in participants with RDEB. Worsening skin disease severity significantly correlated with key clinical manifestations. These results show that patients with RDEB are able to self-report their skin disease severity and wounds.

The challenges of living with and managing epidermolysis bullosa: insights from patients and caregivers

BACKGROUND

Little information is available regarding the burden of living with and managing epidermolysis bullosa, including the distinct challenges faced by patients with different disease types/subtypes.

METHODS

A 90-question/item survey was developed to collect demographics, diagnostic data, management practices, and burden of illness information for patients with epidermolysis bullosa living in the United States. Recruitment was conducted via email and social media in partnership with epidermolysis bullosa patient advocacy organizations in the United States, and the survey was conducted via telephone interview by a third-party health research firm. Respondents aged ≥ 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa or caring for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa were eligible to participate in the survey.

RESULTS

In total, 156 responses were received from patients (n = 63) and caregivers (n = 93) representing the epidermolysis bullosa types of simplex, junctional, and dystrophic (subtypes: dominant and recessive). A large proportion of patients (21%) and caregivers (32%) reported that the condition was severe or very severe, and 19% of patients and 26% of caregivers reported a visit to an emergency department in the 12 months prior to the survey. Among the types/subtypes represented, recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa results in the greatest wound burden, with approximately 60% of patients and caregivers reporting wounds covering > 30% of total body area. Wound care is time consuming and commonly requires significant caregiver assistance. Therapeutic options are urgently needed and reducing the number and severity of wounds was generally ranked as the most important treatment factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Survey responses demonstrate that epidermolysis bullosa places a considerable burden on patients, their caregivers, and their families. The limitations caused by epidermolysis bullosa mean that both patients and caregivers must make difficult choices and compromises regarding education, career, and home life. Finally, survey results indicate that epidermolysis bullosa negatively impacts quality of life and causes financial burden to patients and their families.

Phase I/II open-label trial of intravenous allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in adults with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a hereditary blistering disorder due to a lack of type VII collagen. At present, treatment is mainly supportive.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether intravenous allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (BM-MSCs) are safe in RDEB adults and if the cells improve wound healing and quality of life.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, phase I/II, open-label study recruiting 10 RDEB adults to receive 2 intravenous infusions of BM-MSCs (on day 0 and day 14; each dose 2-4 × 10⁶ cells/kg).

RESULTS

BM-MSCs were well tolerated with no serious adverse events to 12 months. Regarding efficacy, there was a transient reduction in disease activity scores (8/10 subjects) and a significant reduction in itch. One individual showed a transient increase in type VII collagen.

LIMITATIONS

Open-label trial with no placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

MSC infusion is safe in RDEB adults and can have clinical benefits for at least 2 months.

Alopecia in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis and Clinical Features of Disease

Background

Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) are characterised by the body's production of autoantibodies against structural proteins in the epidermis and/or the basement membrane on cutaneous and mucosal surfaces. Alopecia is a complication of AIBD that has generally been overlooked in patients with severe blistering diseases because it is regarded as a cosmetic issue. Yet recent research into quality of life tools has found that stigmatisation by appearance plays a significant role in blistering diseases.

Aim

To review the current literature detailing the pathogenesis and clinical presentations of alopecia in AIBD patients.

Method

We searched Medline, PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases up to September 2018, for empirical human and animal studies.

Results

Only 36 human studies including 223 patients (190 pemphigus, 25 pemphigoid, 5 epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, 2 dermatitis herpetiformis and 1 linear IgA disease) detailed demographic and clinical manifestations of alopecia. A range of hair evaluation methods was demonstrated to reach alopecia diagnosis. Furthermore, with no universal validated scoring system for alopecia severity, alopecia patterns have been summarised.

Conclusion

Previous randomised trials have not highlighted alopecia as an important outcome of AIBD, so epidemiological evaluation of the available literature has been helpful in summarising trends between existing studies and demonstrating inconsistencies.

Pathogenesis and clinical features of alopecia in epidermolysis bullosa: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare genetic skin diseases characterized by the gene mutations encoding adhesion proteins within the skin. These adhesion proteins are also present in normal hair follicles. Anecdotally, there have been reports of scalp alopecia as a complication of EB and there are scattered cases in the literature, but alopecia has generally been overlooked in severe blistering diseases because it is regarded as a cosmetic issue. Therefore, there is no consensus about the natural history and clinical manifestations of alopecia in EB to allow potential intervention.

OBJECTIVES

To review the current literature detailing the pathogenesis and clinical presentations of alopecia in EB patients.

METHODS

Relevant human studies were searched in Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE electronic databases up to October 2018.

RESULTS

Only 15 reports detailed 29 EB patients with demographic and clinical manifestations of alopecia. Vertical biopsy sections were the most common method of alopecia diagnosis, and the most common pattern was patchy scalp alopecia (45%) followed by diffuse alopecia (41%). The most robust finding was nonspecific scarring alopecia in all dystrophic EB (DEB) patients and nonspecific nonscarring alopecia in most patients with EB simplex (EBS).

CONCLUSIONS

Hair abnormalities observed in EB are of variable severity despite there being no universal validated alopecia scoring system, with alopecia occurring secondary to blistering, or in areas prone to trauma.

Oleogel-S10 Phase 3 study "EASE" for epidermolysis bullosa: study design and rationale

Background

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, genetic diseases that affect the integrity of epithelial tissues, most notably the skin. Patients experience recurrent skin wounding, with severity depending on type, sub-type, and mutation. Oleogel-S10, a formulation of birch bark extract, has demonstrated efficacy in a Phase 2 trial assessing re-epithelialization of wounds in EB. EASE (NCT03068780, EudraCT 2016–002066-32) is a randomized, Phase 3, placebo-controlled study designed to determine the efficacy of Oleogel-S10 versus placebo in patients with EB.

Methods

EASE is a Phase 3, two-phase study comprising a 90-day, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase, followed by 24 months of open-label, single-arm follow-up. Patients with junctional EB, dystrophic EB, or Kindler syndrome and target wounds (10 - 50cm²) present for > 21 days and < 9 months, are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive wound dressings according to local standard of care with or without Oleogel-S10. Placebo is based on the Oleogel-S10 vehicle, which is sunflower oil formulated to have a consistency indistinguishable from that of the active product. The primary endpoint of the trial, directed by the US health authority according to the required study endpoints for chronic cutaneous ulcer and burn wounds, is to compare the efficacy of Oleogel-S10 versus placebo according to the proportion of patients with complete closure of the target wound within 45 ± 7 days of treatment. Additional EB-focused endpoints include wound burden, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

Results

Results of the primary endpoint are anticipated to be available by H2 2019.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03068780. EudraCT, 2016–002066-32. Registered on 3 March 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3362-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Occupational therapy for epidermolysis bullosa: clinical practice guidelines

The purpose of this article is to summarize the Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association (DEBRA) International evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for the provision of occupational therapy (OT) for children and adults living with inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB). This is a rare genetic disorder characterized by skin fragility leading to blister formation occurring spontaneously or following minor trauma. Current OT practice for persons with EB is based on anecdotal care, clinical expertise and trial and error with collaboration between caregiver and patient. Intervention based on research is needed to establish a foundation of knowledge to guide international practitioners to create and improve standards of care and to be able to work effectively with those living with the rare diagnosis of this condition.

This CPG was created by an international panel with expertise working with persons with EB. The panel was made up of 11 members including OT’s, a physiotherapist, a medical doctor, social worker, person with EB and a carer of a person with EB. It describes the development of recommendations for 5 outcomes determined by survey of persons with EB, caregivers, and experienced healthcare professionals. The outcomes include independence in activities of daily living (ADL), independence in instrumental ADL, maximization of hand function (non-surgical), fine motor development and retention, and oral feeding skills. The recommendations are supplemented with additional files that include photos and specific examples to further guide occupational therapists or, in situations where an OT is not available, other members of the healthcare team.

As the disorder of EB is rare, evidence-based CPGs are needed to provide a base of knowledge and practice for OTs throughout the world with the goal of providing quality care to patients, while improving their functional independence and quality of life. In addition, this information is valuable as a basis for further research.

Cultured Epidermal Autografts from Clinically Revertant Skin as a Potential Wound Treatment for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Inherited skin disorders have been reported recently to have sporadic normal-looking areas, where a portion of the keratinocytes have recovered from causative gene mutations (revertant mosaicism). We observed a case of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa treated with cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs), whose CEA-grafted site remained epithelized for 16 years. We proved that the CEA product and the grafted area included cells with revertant mosaicism. Based on these findings, we conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial of CEAs from clinically revertant skin for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. The donor sites were analyzed by genetic analysis, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and quantification of the reverted mRNA with deep sequencing. The primary endpoint was the ulcer epithelization rate per patient at 4 weeks after the last CEA application. Three patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with 8 ulcers were enrolled, and the epithelization rate for each patient at the primary endpoint was 87.7%, 100%, and 57.0%, respectively. The clinical effects were found to persist for at least 76 weeks after CEA transplantation. One of the three patients had apparent revertant mosaicism in the donor skin and in the post-transplanted area. CEAs from clinically normal skin are a potentially well-tolerated treatment for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Retrospective longitudinal study of osteoporosis in adults with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

This retrospective study looks at bone mineral density of people with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa as assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Data were collected in 34 patients aged 16-35 years. Statistical analysis showed immobility, low body mass index, and pubertal delay was associated with osteoporosis.

Epidermolysis bullosa-specific module of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL) questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) may have severe impact on different aspects of patients' life. Until now there was no EB-specific quality of life (QoL) instrument for young children.

OBJECTIVE

To create EB-specific proxy module of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL) questionnaire.

METHODS

Focus groups with parents of children with EB were organized. Parents of EB children were interviewed by the project staff with regard to their perception of QoL issues of the skin disease of their children.

RESULTS

Focus groups with parents of EB children in Ukraine and Romania were organized. Parents represented eight boys and 12 girls from 3 months to 4 years old with different EB types and disease severity. Based on the analysis of focus groups' results, two EB specific items that were not mentioned by parents of children with other skin diseases and therefore were not included to the dermatology-specific InToDermQoL questionnaire were developed: 'problems with defecation' and 'problems with shoes'. These problems were mentioned by 55% of all parents and 11.76% of parents that represented EB children older than 1 year, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We want to invite other centres and EB related organizations to join our project starting from the pilot test. There are many different reasons why QoL measurement is important in dermatology clinical practice and our goal is practical use of the instrument in children with EB.

Recent advances in understanding and managing epidermolysis bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous skin fragility disorder characterized by trauma-induced skin dissociation and the development of painful wounds. So far, mutations in 20 genes have been described as being associated with more than 30 clinical EB subtypes. The era of whole-exome sequencing has revolutionized EB diagnostics with gene panels being developed in several EB centers and allowing quicker diagnosis and prognostication. With the advances of gene editing, more focus has been placed on gene editing-based therapies for targeted treatment. However, their implementation in daily care will still take time. Thus, a significant focus is currently being placed on achieving a better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of each subtype and using this knowledge for the design of symptom-relief therapies, i.e. treatment options aimed at ameliorating and not curing the disease.

Reliability and validity of the instrument for scoring clinical outcomes of research for epidermolysis bullosa (iscorEB)

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare and currently incurable genetic blistering disorders. As more pathogenic-driven therapies are being developed, there is an important need for EB-specific validated outcomes measures designed for use in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To test the reliability and construct validity of an instrument for scoring clinical outcomes of research for EB (iscorEB), a new combined clinician- and patient-reported outcomes tool.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study consisting of independent 1-day assessments (six assessors) at two academic hospitals. The assessments consisted of iscorEB clinician (iscorEB-c), Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity (BEBS) and global severity assessment for physicians; and iscorEB patient (iscorEB-p), Quality of Life evaluation in Epidermolysis Bullosa and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index for patients. Construct validity and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interobserver, intraobserver and test-retest reliability were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 patients with a mean age of 19·5 years (1·8-45·2) were included. Disease severity was mild in 42% of cases, moderate in 29% and severe in 29%. The interobserver ICC was 0·96 for both the clinician-reported section of iscorEB-c and BEBS. The ICC for intraobserver reliability was 0·91 and 0·70 for the skin and mucosal domains of iscorEB-c, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for iscorEB-c was 0·89. The test-retest reliability of iscorEB-p was 0·97 and Cronbach's alpha was 0·84. The clinical score differentiated between subjects with mild, moderate and severe disease, and both clinical and patient subscores discriminated between recessive dystrophic EB and other EB subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

iscorEB has robust reliability and construct validity, including strong ability to distinguish EB types and severities. Further studies are planned to test its responsiveness to change.