A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of adalimumab in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the formation of nodules, abscesses, and fistulae at intertriginous sites. Pain, pruritus, malodor, and suppuration have a significant impact on quality of life for HS patients. Prevalence figures vary greatly in the literature from 0.05% to 4.1%, and HS is more common in females. The current understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of HS is incomplete; numerous hypotheses concern the interplay of lifestyle factors, skin microbiota, genetics, and a dysregulated immune system. Due to its phenotypic heterogeneity and multifactorial pathogenesis, HS is a complex disease that can prove challenging to manage. Two approved biologic therapies for the management of HS have led to clinical response in approximately 50% of treated patients. New therapies targeting the interleukin (IL)-1, IL-17, IL-36, and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathways are in ongoing clinical trials, and preliminary data offer hope for greater clinical efficacy in HS in the future.

Inflammasomes: emerging therapeutic targets in hidradenitis suppurativa?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent inflammatory lesions, which affect skin and hair follicles in intertriginous areas. HS has a multifactorial aetiology resulting in barrier dysfunction associated with aberrant immune activation. There is increased evidence for the role of inflammasomes in the pathophysiology of inflammatory skin diseases, including HS. Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes activated following exposure to danger signals, including microbial ligands and components of damaged host cells. Inflammasome activation induces many signalling cascades and subsequent cleavage of proinflammatory cytokines - most notably interleukin (IL)-1β - which have a role in HS pathogenesis. Limited immunotherapies are approved for treating moderate-to-severe HS, with variable response rates influenced by disease heterogeneity. Inflammasomes represent attractive targets to suppress multiple inflammatory pathways in HS, including IL-1β and IL-17. This review aims to summarize the role of inflammasomes in HS and to evaluate evidence for inflammasomes as therapeutic targets for HS treatment.

Comorbidities, Clinical Presentation, Subtypes, and Treatment of HS Patients in Lithuania

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a persistent, recurring skin inflammatory condition linked to various comorbidities. Management involves antibiotics, hormone therapy, immune-modulating drugs, surgery, and treatment of comorbidities. The objectives of the study were to assess the comorbidities, clinical presentation subtypes, and applied treatment of patients with HS. Methods: Patients with HS who visited the Centre of Dermatovenereology at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos in Lithuania underwent evaluation based on the guidelines of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Registry questionnaire. Results: The study included 49 patients, and 61.22% (n = 30) had comorbidities. A strong positive correlation was found between a family history of inflammatory diseases (69.38% (n = 34)) and the severity of HS according to Hurley stage (r = 0.71 p < 0.05). A statistically significant correlation (r = 0.944, p = 0.02) was found between metabolic comorbidities and Hurley stage. Patients on biologic treatment had a mean IHS4 of 7.38 at the beginning of treatment and 3.22 at follow-up (p < 0.05). For patients not on biologics, the initial IHS4 score was 6.21 and 5.42 at follow-up (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A family history of inflammatory diseases and metabolic comorbidities showed a strong correlation with HS severity. Treatment with biologics showed significant improvement in HS scores compared to systemic antibiotics.

S2k‐Leitlinie zur Therapie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa – Kurzfassung

Die S2k‐Leitlinie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa (HS/AI) soll eine akzeptierte Entscheidungshilfe für die Auswahl/Durchführung einer geeigneten/suffizienten Therapie liefern. Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa ist eine chronisch‐rezidivierende, entzündliche, potenziell mutilierende Hauterkrankung des terminalen Haartalgdrüsenapparats, mit schmerzhaften, entzündlichen Läsionen in den apokrinen drüsenreichen Körperregionen. Ihre Punktprävalenz in Deutschland ist 0,3%, sie wird mit einer Verspätung von 10,0 ± 9,6 Jahren diagnostiziert. Abnormale Differenzierung der Keratinozyten des Haartalgdrüsenapparats und eine begleitende Entzündung bilden die zentrale pathogenetische Grundlage. Primäre HS/AI‐Läsionen sind entzündliche Knoten, Abszesse und drainierende Tunnel. Rezidive in den letzten 6 Monaten mit mindestens zwei Läsionen an den Prädilektionsstellen verweisen auf eine HS/AI mit einer 97‐prozentigen Genauigkeit. HS/AI‐Patienten leiden an einer deutlichen Einschränkung der Lebensqualität. Zur korrekten Therapieentscheidung sollen Klassifikation und Aktivitätsbewertung mit einem validierten Instrument erfolgen, wie dem International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa wird nach der Ausprägung der nachweisbaren Entzündung in zwei Formen eingeteilt: aktive, entzündliche (milde, mittelschwere und schwere nach IHS4) und vorwiegend inaktive, nicht entzündliche (Hurley‐Grad‐I, ‐II und ‐III) HS/AI. Orale Tetrazykline oder eine 5‐tägige intravenöse Therapie mit Clindamycin sind mit der Effektivität von Clindamycin/Rifampicin vergleichbar. Subkutan applizierbares Adalimumab, Secukinumab und Bimekizumab sind für die Therapie der HS/AI zugelassen. Für die vorwiegend nicht entzündliche Erkrankungsform stehen verschiedene operative Verfahren zur Verfügung. Medikamentöse/chirurgische Kombinationen gelten als ganzheitliches Therapieverfahren.

S2k guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa / acne inversa - Short version

The S2k guideline on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS/AI) aims to provide an accepted decision aid for the selection/implementation of appropriate/sufficient therapy. HS/AI is a chronic recurrent, inflammatory, potentially mutilating skin disease of the terminal hair follicle-glandular apparatus, with painful, inflammatory lesions in the apocrine gland-rich regions of the body. Its point prevalence in Germany is 0.3%, it is diagnosed with a delay of 10.0 ± 9.6 years. Abnormal differentiation of the keratinocytes of the hair follicle-gland apparatus and accompanying inflammation form the central pathogenetic basis. Primary HS/AI lesions are inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels. Recurrences in the last 6 months with at least 2 lesions at the predilection sites point to HS/AI with a 97% accuracy. HS/AI patients suffer from a significant reduction in quality of life. For correct treatment decisions, classification and activity assessment should be done with a validated tool, such as the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). HS/AI is classified into two forms according to the degree of detectable inflammation: active, inflammatory (mild, moderate, and severe according to IHS4) and predominantly inactive, non-inflammatory (Hurley grade I, II and III) HS/AI. Oral tetracyclines or 5-day intravenous therapy with clindamycin are equal to the effectiveness of clindamycin/rifampicin. Subcutaneously administered adalimumab, secukinumab and bimekizumab are approved for the therapy of HS/AI. Various surgical procedures are available for the predominantly non-inflammatory disease form. Drug/surgical combinations are considered a holistic therapy method.

Comparative efficacy and therapeutic positioning of biologics in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of head-to-head comparative trials makes it difficult to determine the real value of each biological intervention. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy among biologics in treating moderate-to-severe HS throughout a network meta-analysis (NMA) and, to identify which pathogenetic pathways may be the most appropriate to target. Methods We comprehensively identified studies in 3 databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the efficacy of moderate-to-severe HS. Results The NMA comprised 13 studies comprising 14 interventions on 2,748 participants in the network. The NMA showed the odds of achieving the clinical response were significantly superior with adalimumab (RR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.06-0.63), adalimumab QW (RR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.87), MAB1p (RR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.03-3.12), secukinumab (RR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.47) and secukinumabQ2W (RR: 0.24, 95% CI = 0.1-0.46) compared to placebo. Conclusion Based on the NMA, inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a with adalimumab appears to be the best strategy, followed by the blockade of IL--17 with secukinumab. Data for bimekizumab and CJM112 are promising. Infliximab has inconsistent clinical response, and more data are necessary to confirm this molecule as a potential third-line therapy in HS. The blockade of IL-23 and CD5a pathways is not relevant, or at least the current evidence is insufficient to recommend further investigation of guselkumab, risankizumab, and vilobelimab in phase III trials.

A systematic review of 454 randomized controlled trials using the Dermatology Life Quality Index: experience in 69 diseases and 43 countries

BACKGROUND

Over 29 years of clinical application, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has remained the most used patient-reported outcome (PRO) in dermatology due to its robustness, simplicity and ease of use.

OBJECTIVES

To generate further evidence of the DLQI's utility in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to cover all diseases and interventions.

METHODS

The methodology followed PRISMA guidelines and included seven bibliographical databases, searching articles published from 1 January 1994 until 16 November 2021. Articles were reviewed independently by two assessors, and an adjudicator resolved any opinion differences.

RESULTS

Of 3220 screened publications, 454 articles meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion, describing research on 198 190 patients, were analysed. DLQI scores were primary endpoints in 24 (5.3%) of studies. Most studies were of psoriasis (54.1%), although 69 different diseases were studied. Most study drugs were systemic (85.1%), with biologics comprising 55.9% of all pharmacological interventions. Topical treatments comprised 17.0% of total pharmacological interventions. Nonpharmacological interventions, mainly laser therapy and ultraviolet radiation treatment, comprised 12.2% of the total number of interventions. The majority of studies (63.7%) were multicentric, with trials conducted in at least 42 different countries; 40.2% were conducted in multiple countries. The minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) was reported in the analysis of 15.0% of studies, but only 1.3% considered full score meaning banding of the DLQI. Forty-seven (10.4%) of the studies investigated statistical correlation of the DLQI with clinical severity assessment or other PRO/quality of life tools; and 61-86% of studies had within-group scores differences greater than the MCID in 'active treatment arms'. The Jadad risk-of-bias scale showed that bias was generally low, as 91.8% of the studies had Jadad scores of ≥ 3; only 0.4% of studies showed a high risk of bias from randomization. Thirteen per cent had a high risk of bias from blinding and 10.1% had a high risk of bias from unknown outcomes of all participants in the studies. In 18.5% of the studies the authors declared that they followed an intention-to-treat protocol; imputation for missing DLQI data was used in 34.4% of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides a wealth of evidence of the use of the DLQI in clinical trials to inform researchers' and -clinicians' decisions for its further use. Recommendations are also made for improving the reporting of data from future RCTs using the DLQI.

Risk of infection in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa on biologics or other immunomodulators: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful skin condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Biologic agents, including anti-TNF agents and IL-17 inhibitors, have shown promise as treatment options for HS. However, there is concern about the increased risk of infections associated with these therapies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We searched PubMed and Embase until February 1, 2023. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of any infectious complications. Secondary outcomes included serious and opportunistic infections in HS patients treated with biologics or other immunomodulators. Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising 1,696 patients. The pooled incidence rate for any infection was 24.2%, primarily consisting of mild respiratory and skin infections. Subgroup analysis based on the mechanism of action (MOA) showed a pooled incidence of 7.77% for anti-IL1, 14.24% for anti-PDE4, and 21.96% for anti-TNF. Notably, patients receiving anti-IL17 had the highest incidence rate of infection at 33.6%, but the relative risk compared to placebo was not significantly elevated (0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.14). Serious infections were rare, with pooled incidences of 0.39% for anti-IL17 and 0.03% for anti-TNF. Opportunistic infections were infrequent, with 10 reported cases, including eight oral candidiasis, one cryptosporidiosis, and one Blastocystis hominis infection. The use of biologic therapies in HS patients does not significantly increase the risk of infectious complications. Additionally, the occurrence of serious or opportunistic infections in HS patients treated with biologics appears to be minimal.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor treatment of acne fulminans - a clinical and literature review

Acne fulminans (AF) is a rare, serious, sudden-onset and long-lasting skin disease that causes scarring of face and body. Standard treatment with combined long-term isotretinoin and prednisolone is not always sufficient and has a well-known propensity for adverse effects leaving an unmet need for improved therapy. Case reports suggest that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors may play a role in the management of AF. In a 3-year retrospective data collection from two dermatology centers and literature review of clinical cases of acne fulminans treated with anti-TNF-α therapy, three clinical cases and twelve literature cases were identified. A total of five different TNF-α inhibitors have been tested, with adalimumab being the most commonly used. Clinical response was seen after 1 month in 2/3 (67%) clinical cases and 5/12 (42%) literature cases, respectively, and treatment was successful in 2/3 (67%) and 11/12 (92%) after a median 3-7 months. All reported adverse effects were mild and reversible. Anti-TNF-α treatment may provide rapid improvement in patients with AF when initial treatment with isotretinoin and prednisolone fails. However, randomized controlled trials are lacking, and exact dosage and timing need to be explored before clinical implementation.

Behandlung der Acne fulminans mit Tumornekrosefaktor-α-Inhibitoren - eine Übersicht klinischer Fälle und der Literatur: Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor treatment of acne fulminans - a clinical and literature review

Acne fulminans (AF) ist eine seltene, schwerwiegende, plötzlich auftretende und lang andauernde Hauterkrankung, die Vernarbungen im Gesicht und am Körper verursacht. Die Standardbehandlung mit langfristiger Verabreichung einer Kombination aus Isotretinoin und Prednisolon reicht nicht immer aus und kann unerwünschten Wirkungen haben. Es gibt daher einen ungedeckten Bedarf an besseren Therapien. Fallberichte lassen darauf schließen, dass Tumornekrosefaktor‐α (TNF‐α)‐Inhibitoren eine Rolle bei der Behandlung von AF spielen könnten. In einer 3 Jahre abdeckenden retrospektiven Datenerhebung aus zwei dermatologischen Zentren sowie einer Literaturübersicht klinischer Fälle von Acne fulminans, die mit Anti‐TNF‐α‐Therapie behandelt wurden, konnten drei klinische Fälle und zwölf Literaturfälle ermittelt werden. Insgesamt wurden fünf verschiedene TNF‐α‐Inhibitoren eingesetzt, am häufigsten Adalimumab. Klinisches Ansprechen wurde nach 1 Monat bei 2/3 (67%) der klinischen Fälle beziehungsweise 5/12 (42%) der Literaturfälle beobachtet. Nach einer medianen Dauer von 3–7 Monaten war die Behandlung bei 2/3 (67%) und 11/12 (92%) der Betroffenen erfolgreich. Alle berichteten unerwünschten Wirkungen waren leicht und reversibel. Die Anti‐TNF‐α‐Behandlung kann zu schneller Verbesserung bei Patienten mit AF führen, wenn die Erstbehandlung mit Isotretinoin und Prednisolon versagt. Allerdings fehlen randomisierte, kontrollierte Studien, und die exakte Dosierung sowie der exakte Zeitablauf müssen vor der klinischen Umsetzung genauer geprüft werden.

Biology of Interleukin-17 and Novel Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Skin disorders affect ∼40% of the human population. One of the most debilitating cutaneous disorders is Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a noncommunicable chronic inflammatory disease with an estimated global prevalence of 0.4% to 2.5%. In January 2011, high levels of IL-17 were discovered in skin lesions of HS patients. In the following years, translational and clinical research led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of HS. In June 2023, more than 12 years after the initial note, secukinumab, an anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe HS. This is the next milestone in improving the treatment of these patients after the approval of the anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody adalimumab in 2015. In this review article, we present the IL-17 pathway in HS and discuss the use of secukinumab as a therapeutic option for this disease. Our review starts with a description of the epidemiology, clinical features, etiology, and pathogenesis of HS. An overview of the IL-17/IL-17 receptor system in general and a detailed description of the known facts about the expression and action of IL-17 in HS follow. Afterward, we consider the results of clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of IL-17 inhibitors in HS. Finally, a comparison is made between secukinumab and adalimumab and the characteristics of the patients that may be particularly suitable for each of these biologics are described.

Narrative Review and Update on Biologic and Small Molecule Drugs for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Entity With a Promising Future

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory entity characterized by the appearance of multiple nodules, abscesses, and fistulas, predominantly in apocrine regions. In addition to its dermatological involvement, it is associated with multiple systemic comorbidities. Its treatment is combined: topical pharmacological, systemic pharmacological and surgical. Regarding biologic or small molecule drugs, currently only adalimumab is approved. A narrative review of the literature on biological or small molecule drugs used in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa is presented. The arsenal we found is large, with multiple targets: inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, IL-1, inhibitors of the janus kinase (JAK) pathway, and multiple other drugs in study. New prospective studies and comparative trials are needed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of these treatments, in an entity with a promising future.

Narrative Review and Update on Biologic and Small Molecule Drugs for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Entity With a Promising Future

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory entity characterized by the appearance of multiple nodules, abscesses, and fistulas, predominantly in apocrine regions. In addition to its dermatological involvement, it is associated with multiple systemic comorbidities. Its treatment is combined: topical pharmacological, systemic pharmacological and surgical. Regarding biologic or small molecule drugs, currently only adalimumab is approved. A narrative review of the literature on biological or small molecule drugs used in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa is presented. The arsenal we found is large, with multiple targets: inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, IL-1, inhibitors of the janus kinase (JAK) pathway, and multiple other drugs in study. New prospective studies and comparative trials are needed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of these treatments, in an entity with a promising future.

Axillary Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comparison between Two Perforator Flap Reconstructive Approaches after Radical Surgical Management

Background

Axillary hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can result in significant functional impairment in both personal and professional lives. Stage 3 HS requires radical surgical treatment. Flap reconstruction allows for faster healing and better functional and aesthetic outcomes. We compared the results of thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) and propeller inner arm artery perforator (IAAP) flap reconstructions after radical surgical treatment of axillary HS.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study that included 13 consecutive patients who underwent stage 3 axillary HS treatment between August 2015 and January 2023. Seven patients underwent reconstruction by islanded TDAP flaps, whereas six patients underwent reconstruction by propeller IAAP flaps, with one patient undergoing bilateral reconstruction. The data collected from the patient records included age, gender, smoking status, body mass index, comorbidities, operative time, defect size, flap size, hospital stay, and complications.

Results

Although not statistically significant (P = 0.1923), a higher rate of flap complications is reported here with propeller IAAP flaps (42.86 %), whereas islanded TDAP flaps had no flap complications (0%). We found a statistically significant difference in operative time (P = 0.0006), defect size (P = 0.0064), and flap size (P = 0.0012) between the two groups. All patients exhibited satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. Fourteen flaps were performed in total; only one case exhibited recurrence (7.14%).

Conclusion

After radical surgical management, both islanded TDAP and propeller IAAP flap reconstructions offer excellent outcomes for stage 3 axillary HS. We strongly encourage our peers to consider performing perforator flaps over secondary healing for these patients with a major functional impairment.

Assessment tools and phenotype classification for hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a heterogeneous chronic relapsing skin disease. Several assessment tools are used to assess disease severity and to classify disease phenotype; however, no consensus exists. This review evaluates the various assessment tools and phenotypes, assessing their validity and reliability. Numerous assessment tools and phenotype classifications have been proposed for identifying various subtypes within the hidradenitis suppurativa disease spectrum. Each has a different purpose, such as use in daily practice or in clinical trial settings. Several assessment tools and phenotype classifications have been validated but not always with satisfactory results and often with studies showing divergent intra-rater reliability results. A consensus is needed for a validated, easy-to-use, and timesaving assessment tool for routine daily practice. For clinical trials, a validated and extensive assessment tool that also measures response to treatment is also needed.

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgical Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic disease of the apocrine bearing skin causing induration, pain, draining sinuses, and subcutaneous abscesses, significantly impairs patients' quality of life (QOL). Full-thickness excision followed by skin grafting of the involved area can be curative. Herein, we evaluated the impact of this surgical treatment on QOL and depression symptomatology. Adult patients (≥18 years) who consented to participate filled out the dermatology quality of life (DLQI) and the Patient History Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at consent and at 1, 6, and 12 months post-initial evaluation and surgery. Demographics, HS, admission, and operative information were collected. Sixteen patients were included. Subjects were mainly white (81.3 %) and female (56.3%) with a median age of 38.2 (Interquartile range: 34.2-54.5); 62.5% were obese (BMI= 39.7 [28.4-50.6]). Half of the subjects presented with HS in 2 or more areas. Six patients were still undergoing surgeries at 6 months. One-, six-, and 12-month follow-up surveys were obtained from 14, 11, and 8 subjects for DQLI and from 14, 9, and 5 subjects for PHQ9. DLQI scores significantly decreased at 6 months compared to baseline, which indicates QOL improvement (10 [4-20] vs 15.5 [12-21.8], P = .036). Although not significant, PHQ9 scores tended to decrease. For those with the worst disease, DLQI significantly decreased at both 6 (P = .049) and 12 months (P = .047) compared to baseline. Despite a small sample size, our data suggest that aggressive surgical treatment improves the QOL of HS patients. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Racial disparities in dermatology

Significant racial/ethnic disparities in dermatologic care and their subsequent impact on dermatologic conditions were recently reported. Contributing factors include socioeconomic factors, gaps in educational exposure, and underrepresentation of minority groups in the dermatologic workforce. In 2021, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) announced its three-year plan to expand diversity, equity, and inclusion in dermatology. One way to reduce disparities in dermatology is for every dermatologist, regardless of race or ethnicity, to receive adequate education in diseases, treatments, health equity, and tailored approaches to delivering dermatologic care with cultural humility. In addition, a diverse dermatologic workforce-especially at the level of residency program educators and organizational leaders-will contribute to improved cross-cultural understanding, more inclusive research efforts, and improved treatment approaches for conditions that are more prevalent or nuanced in certain racial/ethnic populations. Finally, the dermatology and broader healthcare community needs to acknowledge and educate ourselves on the health impacts of racism.

Our Experience in Using Lateral Chest Flap to Treat Axillary Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects apocrine gland-bearing areas' causing abscesses and sinuses. Multimodality treatment is suggested for management. The surgical option is becoming more widely used, especially in drug-resistant cases. In this article, we describe a series of bilateral axillary hidradenitis cases which we treated with wide local excision and immediate reconstruction with lateral chest flap.

Methods

Fourteen patients presented to our clinic with bilateral hidradenitis suppurativa of the axilla. The cases were all resistant to medical treatment. They were managed by excision and simultaneous reconstruction with lateral chest flaps.

Results

At 3 months postoperatively, all patients had full shoulder range of motion and were completely satisfied with the aesthetic outcome, except for one patient who complained of the bulky look of his axilla. Liposuction was performed for him' with a pleasant resultant outcome.

Conclusions

Our patients underwent wide local excision of bilateral disease plus reconstruction with lateral chest flaps in the same session. Our aim was to introduce a treatment option for moderate to severe axillary hidradenitis suppurativa that offers good aesthetic and functional outcomes.

Top 100 most-cited publications in hidradenitis suppurativa: An updated bibliometric analysis

Background

Over the last several decades, our understanding of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has improved considerably, thereby enhancing our ability to clinically diagnose and treat the disease.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the top 100 most-cited publications related to HS to update bibliometric information on HS.

Materials and methods

We used the Web of Science database to identify reports on hidradenitis suppurativa. Data from the 100 most-cited publications were extracted and analyzed.

Results

The citation number of the top 100 most-cited articles was 89-532 (mean, 153.51), with the most productive periods being from years 2007 to 2016. Most publications originated from the British Journal of Dermatology and the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. The 100 articles originated from 18 countries, with Denmark being the most productive country, followed by the United States (17), England (14), and Germany (12). Jemec GB, from the University of Copenhagen, had 32 citations and was the most frequently identified author. The 100 articles encompassed several fields of research as follows: pathogenesis (18%), pathophysiology (7%), epidemiology (14%), clinical diagnosis and features (16%), treatment (25%), comorbidity (10%), and others (10%). In total, 11 reviews, three guidelines, and 86 original articles (nine randomized clinical trials) were included.

Conclusion

Through this bibliometric analysis, we aimed to indicate a series of intellectual landmark publications that offer us critical reviews, guidelines, and original articles, which highlight the immense level of progress achieved in the field of HS.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors for Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) vary among different countries, and several biologics and small molecule inhibitors have been tested for treating moderate-to-severe HS over the past few years. However, treatment guidelines for HS vary among different countries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to exam the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs) of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in treating moderate-to-severe HS. Binary outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total of 2076 participants on nine biologics and three small-molecule inhibitors for treating moderate-to-severe HS, including adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, avacopan, bimekizumab, CJM112, etanercept, guselkumab, IFX-1, INCB054707, infliximab, and MABp1. The meta-analysis revealed only adalimumab (RR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.44-2.17) and bimekizumab (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) achieved significant improvement on hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), and adalimumab was superior to placebo in achieving dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 (RR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.70-9.28). No increase in SAEs was found for all included active treatments when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab and bimekizumab are the only two biologics effective in achieving HiSCR with acceptable safety profile, whereas adalimumab is the only biologic effective in achieving DLQI 0/1.

Advances in biologic and small molecule therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disorder characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, fistulae, and scarring with a predilection for flexural regions. Several biologics and small molecule inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials for treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the data available from clinical trials and smaller, high-quality studies for existing and emerging biologic and small molecule inhibitor therapies for treatment of HS. Biologics discussed include TNFα, IL-17, IL-23, IL-12/23, and IL-1 inhibitors. Small molecule inhibitors discussed include PDE4, JAK, TYK, IFX-1, and complement cascade inhibitors. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for these drugs are also described.

EXPERT OPINION

Trial data and our own experience have shown that about half of HS patients experience improvement with adalimumab. However, there is a significant need for pharmacotherapies with higher efficacy goals as in those used for psoriasis. Many biologics and small molecule inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials. The landscape of upcoming therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa appears promising.

Improvement in Quality of Life and Pain in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa After Wide Local Excision: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects patients' quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in QoL in patients with HS after wide local excision (WLE) and to examine the level of pain, rate of postoperative complications, recurrences, and the time to complete wound closure.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent WLE of HS, followed by secondary wound healing. Dermatologic Life Quality Questionnaire, pain, and wound size were measured 1 day, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Dermatologic Life Quality Questionnaire and pain scores (mean ± SD) improved significantly (both p < .001) from 14.5 ± 7.3 and 3.7 ± 2.8 at baseline to 5.8 ± 6.9 and 0.8 ± 1.7, 6 months postoperatively, respectively. Wounds were closed completely by secondary intention after 4.4 ± 2.8 months. Sixteen patients (29.1%) experienced postoperative complications, local recurrences in the treated sites were observed in 11 patients (20%), and new lesions in untreated sites were observed in 5 cases (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

Wide local excision significantly improves patients' QoL and pain, and, given its low rate of recurrence and complications, should be considered as a first-line therapy, especially in patients with higher Hurley stages.

Trends in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Disease Severity and Quality of Life Outcome Measures: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Although there has been an increase in the number of randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment efficacy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), instrument measurements of disease severity and quality of life (QoL) are varied, making the compilation of data and comparisons between studies a challenge for clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to perform a systematic literature search to examine the recent trends in the use of disease severity and QoL outcome instruments in randomized controlled trials that have been conducted on patients with HS.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in February 2021. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used to identify all articles published from January 1964 to February 2021. In total, 41 articles were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

The HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) score (18/41, 44%) was the most commonly used instrument for disease severity, followed by the Sartorius and Modified Sartorius scales (combined: 16/41, 39%). The Dermatology Life Quality Index (18/41, 44%) and visual analogue pain scales (12/41, 29%) were the most commonly used QoL outcome instruments in HS research.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials conducted from 2013 onward commonly used the validated HiSCR score, while older studies were more heterogeneous and less likely to use a validated scale. A few (6/18, 33%) QoL measures were validated instruments but were not specific to HS; therefore, they may not be representative of all factors that impact patients with HS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

National Institute of Health Research PROSPERO CRD42020209582; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020209582.

Clinical Implementation of Biologics and Small Molecules in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, auto-inflammatory skin disease originating from the hair follicles. The typical inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining sinus tracts (tunnels) are characterized by a massive influx of neutrophils, macrophages, B-cells, plasma cells, T helper (Th)1, Th17 cells and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α. Over the last decades, several clinical trials evaluated the clinical efficacy of different biologics targeting these pro-inflammatory cytokines, in particular TNF-α and IL-1. However, adalimumab is still the only registered drug for HS. This review discusses biologics and small molecules with high level of evidence for their clinical application, provides guidance on when and how to use these biologics and small molecules in clinical practice, and elaborates on the combination with medical and surgical treatment options beyond the current guidelines. Furthermore this review provides an overview of potential biologics and small molecules currently under investigation for novel targets in HS such as IL-36, C5a, Janus kinase family members, CD-40, LTA4 and CXCR1/2.

MCPIP1/Regnase-1 Expression in Keratinocytes of Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Preliminary Results

The pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is yet to be fully understood. However, inflammation is a key element in the development of skin lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1-induced protein-1 (MCPIP1) in the skin of patients suffering from HS. Skin biopsies of 15 patients with HS and 15 healthy controls were obtained and processed for immunohistochemistry, western blot, and real time PCR. The highest mean MCPIP1 mRNA expression was found in the inflammatory lesional skin of HS patients. It was significantly higher than MCPIP1 mRNA expression in the biopsies from both healthy controls and non-lesional skin of HS patients. Western blot analysis indicated that expression of MCPIP1 was elevated within both lesional and non-lesional skin compared to the healthy control. The increased MCPIP1 mRNA and protein expression level in HS lesions may indicate its possible role in the disease pathogenesis.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is used as a first-line biologic agent in the management of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Pooled estimates, namely standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR), were calculated using random-effect model with trial sequential analysis. Small study effects were examined using the Doi plot. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using "The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" approach, and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) was calculated.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials, involving 1014 patients, were included. We performed subgroup analysis of adalimumab administered subcutaneously both weekly and every other week. Adalimumab administered weekly was associated with better clinical response achievement (RR 1.76, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.35-2.29; trial sequential analysis TSA-adjusted CI 1.01-3.08; CoE: low; NNT = 5) and a significant improvement in modified Sartorius score (SMD = -0.45, 95% CI = -0.76 to -0.13; CoE: very low; NNT = 10) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) (SMD -0.47, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.32; CoE: low; NNT = 10). Nevertheless, adalimumab administered every other week showed an improvement only in modified Sartorius score. The pooled RRs of adverse events in both groups revealed no statistical significance when compared with the placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab administered weekly resulted in not only better clinical responses than placebo but also significantly improved disease severity and quality of life of patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Our study provides supporting evidence to the current guidelines and aids decision-making in the application of adalimumab in HS management.

Association of hidradenitis suppurativa with Crohn's disease

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts. Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by inflammation of the entire digestive tract and belongs to the group of inflammatory bowel diseases, and there are many extraintestinal manifestations, among which hidradenitis suppurativa is one of the rare extraintestinal manifestations. There appears to be a strong association between CD and HS based on clinical and histological similarities (sinus tract development, granulomatous inflammation, and scarring), intersections in pathogenesis (genetic loci, immune dysregulation mechanisms, and microbiome changes), and commonality in treatment. In this review, we summarize recent studies on the association between HS and CD.

A safety review of biologic therapies for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa and unmet needs

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disorder characterized by nodules, abscesses, fistulae, and significant scarring in intertriginous areas rich in apocrine glands. Immunomodulator drugs, including biologics, are a mainstay of treatment for this disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review details the safety profiles of various biologic therapies currently available commercially that have been tried for HS as assessed in clinical trials and observational studies. As the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS, adalimumab is discussed in the most detail. Additional biologic medications, including tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors, interleukin 1 (IL-1) inhibitors, IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors, are discussed as well. Safety concerns in special populations, including pregnant women and children, are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Existing data support excellent short-term and long-term safety profiles for adalimumab, although caution must be taken with use in high-risk patient populations, including those with chronic infections or increased risk of malignancy. Based on their safety data for other indications, additional biologic agents appear safe in HS as well. However, further research is needed to fully understand the safety profiles of these medications in the HS population.

Efficacy of non-surgical monotherapies for hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and network meta-analyses of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

We determined the relative efficacy of non-surgical monotherapies for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

METHODS

Network meta-analyses were conducted to determine treatments' surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value (i.e., an estimate that ranks efficacy); pairwise comparisons were conducted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ten trials were eligible for quantitative analyses; however, all did not have a common endpoint. Outcomes corresponded to pain severity, clinical response, quality of life and abscess count. For pain reduction, infliximab was ranked most efficacious (SUCRA =94%) compared to bermekimab, anakinra and placebo; infliximab reduced pain more significantly (p < 0.05) than anakinra and than placebo. For occurrence of clinical response, bimekizumab had the highest SUCRA (67%) relative to adalimumab, anakinra and placebo; bimekizumab was more efficacious than placebo (p < 0.05). For quality of life in mild HS, Botox had the highest SUCRA (94%) compared to adalimumab and placebo; Botox was more efficacious than placebo (p < 0.05). For reduction in abscess count, oral tetracycline had the highest SUCRA (48%) compared to topical clindamycin and vehicle. Our work-being the first NMA study on non-surgical HS monotherapies-contributes to the comparative effectiveness literature for this condition.

Metabolic, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological issues of biologic therapies currently used in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, relapsing, debilitating inflammatory dermatologic disease of the terminal hair follicles at intertriginous sites clinically characterized by painful inflammatory nodules, abscesses, draining sinus tracts, and dermal fibrosis. The management of hidradenitis suppurativa is a challenge and usually consists of both medical and surgical approaches, which must often be combined for best outcome. The introduction of biological therapies, specifically TNFα-inhibitors such as adalimumab, has profoundly changed the therapeutic armamentarium of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

The PubMed database was searched using combinations of the following keywords: hidradentis suppurativa, biologic therapy, TNF-α inhibitors, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, adverse effects, pharmacodynamics, pharmacology, adverse events, pharmacokinetics, drug interaction. This article reviews and updates the chemistry, pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, adverse effects, drug interactions of on-label and off-label use of TNF-α inhibitors in HS.

EXPERT OPINION

Biologic agents, particularly adalimumab, exhibit clinical efficacy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Careful patient selection and close monitoring during treatment are mandatory to provide safe and effective use of the TNF-α inhibitor. Familiarity with biologic agents is crucial because these agents could become a consolidated treatment option in the clinician's therapeutic approaches.

Multidisciplinary Update on Genital Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review

Importance

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a predilection for the genital region. Genital HS requires medical and surgical management as well as close collaboration among a multidisciplinary team.

Observations

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a disease of the hair follicles that results in recurrent nodules, abscesses, and tunneling sinus tracts. Medical treatment mainstays include antibiotics and retinoids, but the evolving class of biologic medications has gained traction in the treatment of moderate and severe disease. Many of the medical therapies come with adverse effects requiring clinical and laboratory monitoring over the course of treatment. When lesions are refractory to therapy or are too large for medical therapy alone, surgical intervention is required. Surgical procedures can include treatment of affected areas with deroofing or excision of affected skin. When large portions of genital skin are removed, reconstruction is necessary to restore function and aesthetics of the genitals. We describe a variety of reconstructive techniques based on the size and location of the skin deficiency.

Conclusions and Relevance

Effective management of genital hidradenitis suppurativa requires a thorough understanding of medical and surgical techniques for prevention, treatment, and reconstruction of genital defects.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa as a Paradoxical Side Effect to the Use of Adalimumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease?

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with inflammatory bowel disease. However, it can arise as a paradoxical side effect of anti-TNF treatment.

Methods

The article reports on three patients with Crohn's disease who developed hidradenitis suppurativa during the treatment with adalimumab.

Results

Case 1: A 38-year-old female exhibited an infiltrative lesion in the inguinal region and vulva, consistent with hidradenitis suppurativa, after three months of adalimumab. These lesions were treated with partial vulvectomy. Case 2: After adalimumab treatment, a 27-year-old female, originally diagnosed with ileocolonic Crohn's disease, went into clinical and endoscopic remission. The patient eventually presented two hyperchromic nodules in the inguinal region, which were diagnosed as hidradenitis suppurativa. The patient showed improvement after treatment with oral doxycycline and local therapy. Case 3: A 34-year-old female with fistulizing and stenosing ileocolonic Crohn's disease, started adalimumab in 2010, with optimization in 2015. One year after, the patient developed bilateral, erythematous, hardened, inguinal nodulations with purulent drainage, consistent with hidradenitis suppurativa. Treatment with oral doxycycline, fusidic acid, and infiltration with triamcinolone resulted in partial improvement of the lesions. In 2018, the lesions deteriorate. The patient underwent surgical treatment.

Conclusion

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are more likely to the development of other mediated inflammatory diseases, such as hidradenitis suppurativa. Hidradenitis suppurativa may appear as a paradoxical reaction to anti-TNF therapy. Clinical teams must be aware of this type of complication. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for controlling the disease and preventing the onset of complications.

The most recent advances in understanding and managing hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicle unit that typically develops after puberty. HS has a significant negative impact on both the quality of life (QOL) of patients affected by this disease as well as family members and caregivers. However, the pathogenesis of HS is multifactorial and still remains to be fully elucidated, which makes the development of treatments difficult. The last 10 years have seen a surge in HS research, and many new findings have come to light, yet much more remains to be elucidated. Physicians must employ a multidisciplinary approach to maximally address all facets of HS. Clinical characteristics of the disease that differ between females and males as well as across different races and ethnic groups must be considered. Targeted topical, oral, and injectable therapies continue to be developed for HS as a greater understanding of the pathogenesis is reached. However, randomized controlled trials regarding dietary factors that may contribute to HS are needed to meet our patients’ growing concerns and questions about the role of diet in HS pathogenesis. Finally, improved outcome measures are needed to standardize HS severity and grading between physicians and clinical trials, and a more diverse representation of HS populations is needed in clinical trials.

Medical and Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of International Treatment Guidelines and Implementation in General Dermatology Practice

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic painful skin disease that severely impairs patients' quality of life. While high-quality trials of HS therapies remain limited, medical knowledge of best treatment practices is rapidly evolving, leading to the recent publication of multiple international treatment guidelines for HS.

SUMMARY

This review compares international HS treatment guidelines, describes evidence for effectiveness of common and emerging HS therapies, and provides guidance for integrating evidence-based HS care into practice. Although over 50 medical and procedural treatments are mentioned across international HS guidelines, only adalimumab and infliximab have grade B/weak recommendation or higher across all major guidelines. This review describes the appropriate patient selection and effectiveness of the most commonly used medical and procedural treatments for HS. It also includes recommendations for counseling, dosing, and duration of medical therapies as well as procedure videos for the practicing dermatologist.

Emerging medical treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting intertriginous skin areas, and it is characterized by recurrent painful episodes of inflammatory drainage. Although the pathophysiology of HS is not fully understood, recent research points to an imbalance of cytokines as a contributing factor to the associated symptoms of purulent drainage and sinus tract formation. HS lesions are often characterized by a superimposed pathogenic/commensal bacterial infection that can improve with targeted antibiotic therapy. New medical treatments have emerged in recent years, many of which specifically work against a variety of proinflammatory mediators associated with HS. These newer, specified treatment options, in conjunction with surgery and lasers, are thought to provide positive outcomes and an overall improvement in quality of life in patients with HS.

Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic skin condition characterized by recurrent painful abscesses usually limited to the intertriginous areas. Global prevalence has been estimated at up to 4% of the population. The exact pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa is yet to be elucidated; however, recent research has shown that the disease occurs under the influence of multiple genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Repeated insults result in sinus tract formation and disfigurement, which can have a significant psychosocial effect on patients. A wide range of treatments are available but none are curative. A combination antibiotic regimen is considered first line, and research into the use of biologics has been promising. Early recognition and treatment is paramount to achieving a better prognosis and improving patient quality of life.

Long-term safety of adalimumab for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory skin disorder that affects regions rich in apocrine glands. Although the etiology of HS is not clear, inflammatory cytokines, like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, participate in pathogenesis. Adalimumab (ADA), a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively targets TNFα, is the only EMA/FDA-approved biologic agent available for the therapy of moderate-to-severe HS.Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to present existing studies with an emphasis on the safety profile of ADA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. ADA is prescribed for more than 15 years for varied indications and has improved the therapeutic outcomes of many diseases. Clinical trials and real-life safety data from ADA administration in HS were presented, with particular attention to special populations, such as children, elderly, and pregnant women.Expert opinion: Existing data advise for limited safety concerns with long-term ADA treatment provided that patients are thoroughly screened for infections, latent tuberculosis, and history of malignancy before the start of treatment.

An Update on Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a common inflammatory skin condition which causes recurrent abscesses, sinuses and scarring in the axillae, groin and inframammary areas. As well as causing significant physical distress due to pain and discharge, the condition impacts psychological well-being with markedly impaired quality of life. Patients suffer pain, embarrassment and psychological distress with impairment of their work and intimate relationships marking it as one of the most distressing dermatological conditions. Numerous studies have documented markers of psychological distress encompassing the physical effects such as pain and itch, affects on mood and impaired function.

Race and Ethnicity Gaps in Global Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an often-debilitating disease characterized by chronic and recurrent painful nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts affecting the intertriginous areas. Despite evidence in the literature of varying prevalence of HS among different racial and ethnic groups, no studies have evaluated the overall generalizability of clinical trial results considering the increased prevalence of HS among African American populations. Additionally, there is a paucity of data exploring the distribution of race and ethnicity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for HS. The goal of this analysis is to explore the distribution of race and ethnicity in recent HS RCTs.

SUMMARY

Using ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed, race and ethnicity demographics were extracted from phase II and III trials published from 2000 to August 2019. Fifteen trials were included and among these trials 669 (68.0%) participants were Caucasian and 138 (14.0%) were of African descent. Asians, American Indian or Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders comprised 29 (2.9%), 3 (0.3%), and 1 (0.1%) participant respectively. Only 15 participants were reported as Hispanic as only three trials reported ethnicity data. The remaining 144 (14.6%) participants were recorded as "other/unspecified" (36 self-identified, 108 lacked race reporting). None of the trials included sub-analysis of treatment efficacy based on race or ethnicity.

Biologics for hidradenitis suppurativa: an update

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory dermatosis characterized by an occurrence of nodules, abscesses, sinus tracks and scarring. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial and still not fully understood, therefore, current systemic therapies still remain a serious challenge. Increased levels of several proinflammatory cytokines have been reported in patients suffering from HS, therefore biologics appear as a new approach to therapy for this condition. Adalimumab is the only one internationally registered agent and should be considered first after the conventional therapies appear insufficient. The efficacy and safety profile of some preparations, like infliximab and etanercept was confirmed so far in randomized trials, but there are some new biologics which are still being evaluated and require more rigorous examination.

A Comparison of International Management Guidelines for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis that imparts a significant burden on patients and presents a management challenge for healthcare providers. As attention to this debilitating condition has grown over recent years, our understanding of HS pathogenesis and optimal treatment approaches continues to evolve. Nine HS treatment guidelines developed by various expert organizations have been published, encompassing therapeutic modalities ranging from topical agents to systemic therapies to procedural interventions. These guidelines demonstrate significant overlap in treatment recommendations and have all been published within the last 5 years. Therefore, we aim to compare and synthesize the recommendations of international HS treatment guidelines and to encourage inter-organizational communication for the development of consensus or staggered publication of recommendations for HS management.

Biologic Treatment for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are often undertreated and there are limited efficacious therapies available for treating this population. Biologics are an emerging therapeutic modality used in the management of many inflammatory conditions including HS. Implementation of biologics is typically reserved for moderate-to-severe cases or in those cases that are refractory to treatment. Though many biologics have been trialed for use in HS, only one biologic, adalimumab, is currently US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. Limitations in the use of biologics for HS include the many scoring systems utilized in research studies and the relatively few well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials.

North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part I: Diagnosis, evaluation, and the use of complementary and procedural management

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting hair follicles, with profoundly negative impact on patient quality of life. Evidence informing ideal evaluation and management of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa is still sparse in many areas, but it has grown substantially in the last decade. Part I of this evidence-based guideline is presented to support health care practitioners as they select optimal management strategies, including diagnostic testing, comorbidity screening, and both complementary and procedural treatment options. Recommendations and evidence grading based on the evidence available at the time of the review are provided.

North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part II: Topical, intralesional, and systemic medical management

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a severe and debilitating dermatologic disease. Clinical management is challenging and consists of both medical and surgical approaches, which must often be combined for best outcomes. Therapeutic approaches have evolved rapidly in the last decade and include the use of topical therapies, systemic antibiotics, hormonal therapies, and a wide range of immunomodulating medications. An evidence-based guideline is presented to support health care practitioners as they select optimal medical management strategies and is reviewed in this second part of the management guidelines. A therapeutic algorithm informed by the evidence available at the time of the review is provided.

Exploring changes in placebo treatment arms in hidradenitis suppurativa randomized clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is characterized by recurrent, painful nodules in flexural areas.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore the placebo response in HS randomized clinical trials and to compare it briefly with the placebo response in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

A Cochrane Review on interventions in HS was used as a starting point, and a systematic review was then undertaken by using the PubMed database, yielding 7 HS randomized clinical trials for inclusion in this study.

RESULTS

This review demonstrates that there is a robust placebo response in HS that is most marked in physical signs but also marked in pain responses.

LIMITATIONS

Multiple outcome measures utilized in these studies and reporting bias limited this review.

CONCLUSION

This large placebo response has implications for clinical trial design. This knowledge can also help deliver improved clinical care by forming the basis of nonpharmacologic treatments and help optimize current medication use to maximize the placebo effect.

TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex disease with a dramatic impact on the quality of life of patients that it afflicts. Despite this, there are few treatment options offering long-term relief. The exact pathophysiology of HS is unclear, although the current theory involves follicular obstruction, rupture, and subsequent inflammation leading to fistula and abscess development in intertriginous skin. Several inflammatory modulators have been implicated in the development of HS, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α as well as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-10, and IL-17. Initial evidence for the use of TNF-α inhibitors in HS stemmed from recognition that inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with these medications saw a concurrent improvement in their HS symptoms. Early case reports and case series illustrated TNF-α inhibitors’ value in the treatment of HS. Later, two phase III clinical trials, PIONEER I and PIONEER II, demonstrated that adalimumab is an efficacious treatment for HS. Infliximab represents another effective HS treatment option with its main advantage being dosing flexibility. In contrast, clinical trials have failed to show evidence for application of etanercept in HS. There is limited data on other TNF-α inhibitors such as certolizumab-pegol and golimumab. This review outlines the history, dosing, response, and adverse effects of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of HS.

Quality of life measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa: position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology task forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

This paper is organized jointly by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force (TF) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and the EADV TF on acne, rosacea and hidradenitis suppurativa (ARHS). The purpose of this paper was to present current knowledge about QoL assessment in HS, including data on HS-specific health-related (HR) QoL instruments and HRQoL changes in clinical trials, and to make practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in people with HS. HS results in significant quimp that is higher than in most other chronic skin diseases. HS impact in published studies was assessed predominantly (84% of studies) by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). There is a lack of high-quality clinical trials in HS patients where HRQoL instruments have been used as outcome measures. One double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial on infliximab with low number of participants reported significantly better HRQoL improvement in the treatment group than in the placebo group. Well-designed clinical studies in HS patients to compare different treatment methods, including surgical methods and assessing long-term effects, are needed. Because of lack of sufficient validation, the Task Forces are not at present able to recommend existing HS-specific HRQoL instruments for use in clinical studies. The EADV TFs recommend the dermatology-specific DLQI questionnaire for use in HS patients. The EADV TFs encourage the further development, validation and use of other HS-specific, dermatology-specific and generic instruments but such use should be based on the principles presented in the previous publications of the EADV TF on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.

The anti-inflammatory potency of biologics targeting tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-12/23 and CD20 in hidradenitis suppurativa: an ex vivo study

Background

Biologics targeting inflammatory mediators can achieve clinical improvements in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, their clinical efficacy shows great interpatient variability in daily practice.

Objectives

To investigate the anti‐inflammatory potency of a selection of currently available biologics and prednisolone for the treatment of HS in an ex vivo skin culture system using lesional HS biopsies.

Methods

Lesional skin samples from 10 patients with HS and skin samples from five healthy controls were cultured ex vivo and exposed to prednisolone or biologics targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, interleukin (IL)‐17A, IL‐12/23p40 or CD20 (adalimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, ustekinumab and rituximab, respectively). Real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and cytokine bead arrays were used to measure the inhibitory effect of the biologics on cytokines and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs).

Results

The relative mRNA expression of all tested cytokines and AMPs was significantly downregulated by all anti‐inflammatory agents (P < 0·001). The protein production of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF‐α, interferon γ, IL‐1β, IL‐6 and IL‐17A was significantly inhibited by adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, prednisolone (all P < 0·001) and rituximab (P = 0·0071), but not by secukinumab (P = 0·0663). On both mRNA and protein levels, adalimumab, infliximab and prednisolone reduced the levels of a broader mix of individual cytokines than secukinumab, ustekinumab and rituximab. Moreover, a significant inhibitory effect on mRNA expression levels of inflammatory markers in healthy control skin was observed only for TNF‐α inhibitors (P < 0·001) and prednisolone (P = 0·0015).

Conclusions

This ex vivo study suggests that TNF‐α inhibitors and prednisolone are the most powerful inhibitors of proinflammatory cytokines and AMPs in HS lesional skin, which concurs with our clinical experience in patients with HS.

What's already known about this topic?

A key element of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an aberrant immune response characterized by the overexpression of several proinflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides in lesional skin.

Biologics targeting inflammatory cytokines have the potential to improve HS disease activity.

There is still need for efficacious drugs in the treatment of HS.

What does this study add?

We sought to quantify the anti‐inflammatory effects of currently available biologics in an ex vivo disease model.

Adalimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, ustekinumab and rituximab in addition to prednisolone significantly inhibited a selected panel of proinflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides in ex vivo HS lesional skin.

Adalimumab, infliximab and prednisolone reduced the levels of a broader mix of individual cytokines than secukinumab, ustekinumab and rituximab.

What is the translational message?

The significant inhibition of important proinflammatory cytokines by tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitors in HS correlates with their clinical efficacy.

Our ex vivo skin culture system represents an adequate model for studies in search of novel candidate drugs for the treatment of HS and to personalize the treatment in specific patients.

Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18173.

https://www.bjdonline.com/article/