Haemopoietic reconstitution after autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with malignancies: a multicentre retrospective study

Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection efficacy is not an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The successful mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells are dependent on a number of clinical factors such as previous chemotherapy and disease stage. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether the effectiveness of mobilization and collection is an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 358 patients who received transplants from January 2003 to December 2004 (201 male and 157 female patients, ages from 2.7 to 77.3 years with median of 53 years of age) underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell collection after mobilization with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF plus chemotherapy priming. This retrospective study included patients with diagnoses of acute myelogenous leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, and solid tumors. All patients underwent stem cell collection until a target or a minimum CD34+ cell dose was reached. Correlations were performed between stem cell mobilization and/or collection efficacy and transplantation outcomes.

RESULTS

In general, both larger reinfused CD34+ cell dose and shorter number of days for the stem cell count to reach the minimum of 2 x 10(6) per kg CD34+ cells do not foster quicker engraftment. Reinfused CD34+ cell dose of less than 12 x 10(6) and number of days stem cell collection to reach this minimum CD34+ cell dose did not independently affect the overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection as defined as number of days to reach a CD34+ cell dose of 2 x 10(6) per kg should not be used independently to forecast posttransplantation prognosis, engraftment, DFS, and OS.

Establishment and optimization of a flow cytometric method for evaluation of viability of CD34+ cells after cryopreservation and comparison with trypan blue exclusion staining

BACKGROUND

Trypan blue exclusion staining is probably the most frequently applied method (Method I) for assessment of viability in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts after cryopreservation. Alternatively, a flow cytometry-based method (Method II) was established and optimized.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a first series of 22 autologous apheresis products, the influence of duration of antibody staining and red cell (RBC) lysis on viability was investigated. In a second series of 21 autologous and 1 allogeneic apheresis products, the effect of omitting the RBC lysis was evaluated. On the basis of the results of the first two series, 155 autologous and 57 allogeneic apheresis products were analyzed with Method I and the now optimized Method II.

RESULTS

Halving the incubation times did not influence the viability of CD45+ or CD34+ cells. Omission of RBC lysis resulted in a significantly (p = 0.022) increased median viability of CD45+ cells (75.8% vs. 71.0%) without any influence on CD34+ cells. In the third series, the median viability of CD34+ cells (96.9%) was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher compared with the viability of CD45+ cells (76.2%) and the viability determined by Method I (86.5%).

CONCLUSION

The viability of CD34+ cells was significantly higher compared with the viability of all white blood cells. The presented cytometry-based method is superior to the standard trypan blue method regarding the number of analyzable cells and documentation, regarding observer independence and standardization; it allows the analysis of the cells of interest for transplantation after minimal sample manipulation.

The role of growth factor administration and T-cell recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of solid tumors: results from a randomized comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation (PBPCT) combined with post-PBPCT administration of myelopoietic growth factors is a valid therapeutic intervention to rapidly restore hematopoiesis after the delivery of intensive, myeloablative cancer chemotherapy. On the other hand, the best growth factor regimen to potentiate PBPC-mediated immunohematopoietic recovery has yet to be determined.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a randomized evaluation, the effects produced by post-PBPCT G-CSF and GM-CSF on myeloid/lymphoid recovery and transplant outcome in women with chemosensitive cancer were compared. Thirty-seven ovarian cancer patients and 34 breast cancer patients ranging in age from 24 to 60 years were treated with carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) high-dose chemotherapy and then randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) or GM-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) until Day 13 after PBPCT. Patients were compared in regard to hematopoietic recovery, posttransplant clinical management, and immune recovery. Finally, clinical outcome was estimated as time to progression and overall survival.

RESULTS

Hematopoietic recovery and posttransplant clinical management were comparable in both the G-CSF and GM-CSF series. Conversely, significantly higher T-cell counts were observed in G-CSF-treated patients during the early and late posttransplant follow-up. Patients who received G-CSF showed a significantly longer median time to progression. A parallel analysis revealed that patients in whom a higher CD3+ count was recovered had a significantly longer overall survival and time to progression.

CONCLUSION

The enhancement of post-PBPCT T-cell recovery observed in G-CSF-treated patients encourages the use of G-CSF to ameliorate immune recovery, which seems to play a role in post-PBPCT control of disease in cancer patients. GM-CSF might be administered to prolong immunosuppression after autologous PBPCT for autoimmune diseases or allogeneic PBPCT.

Mechanisms of immune dysfunction in stem cell transplantation

High dose therapy (HDT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) results in alterations in the immunologic network, thymic re-education and the induction of peripheral tolerance. The changes to the immunoregulatory cascade and tolerance induction associated with autotransplants have been investigated in a series of studies focused on leukocyte reconstitution and function following HDT and autologous SCT. In these studies, we observed a significant decrease in the CD4:CD8 T cell ratio post-transplantation compared to normal peripheral blood (PB) donors due to a decrease in CD4+ cells. In addition, T cell function (phytohemagglutinin (PHA) mitogenesis) was consistently depressed compared to samples obtained from normal PB donors. The loss of T cell function was associated with an increased frequency of circulating monocytes, their expression of Fas ligand (FasL) and a high frequency of apoptotic CD4+ T cells. Indeed, 28-51% of circulating CD4+ T cells were observed to be apoptotic during the first 100 days following HDT and SCT. These studies suggest that 'primed' or activated Fas+ CD4+ lymphocytes interact with FasL+ monocytes, resulting in apoptosis, leading to the preferential deletion of CD4+ T cells, a decrease in the CD4:CD8 T cell ratio and depressed T cell function. Further, as discussed herein, the T cells are activated with a predominantly type 2 phenotype, which may also contribute to the maintenance of the immunosuppressive condition. Therefore, there is the potential to regulate immune recovery by stem cell product manipulation or post-transplantation cytokine administration.

A cell-kinetic model of CD34+ cell mobilization and harvest: development of a predictive algorithm for CD34+ cell yield in PBPC collections

BACKGROUND

Mobilization and homing of PBPCs are still poorly understood. Thus, a sufficient algorithm for the prediction of PBPC yield in apheresis procedures does not yet exist.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The decline of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood during apheresis and their simultaneous increase in the collection bag were determined in a prospective study of 18 consecutive apheresis procedures. A cell-kinetic, four-compartment model describing these changes was developed. Retrospective data from 136 apheresis procedures served to further improve this model. A predictive algorithm for the yield was developed that considered the sex, weight, and height of the patient, the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood before apheresis, the inlet flow, and the duration of the apheresis. The accuracy of this algorithm was evaluated by comparison of the predicted and the observed yields of CD34+ cells in 105 prospective autologous and 148 retrospective allogeneic apheresis procedures.

RESULTS

The correlation between predicted and observed yields was good for the autologous and allogeneic groups with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8979 and 0.8311 (p<0.0001), respectively. The regression is described by the equations log (measured value [m]) = 1.0118 + 0.8595 x log (predicted value [p]) for the autologous and log (m) = 2.226 + 0.7559 x log (p) for the allogeneic group. The respective equations for the zero-point regression are log (m) = 1.014 x log (p) and log (m) = 1.026 x log (p). The probability that the measured value was 90 percent or more of the predicted value was 83.8 percent for the autologous and 90.5 percent for the allogeneic apheresis procedures.

CONCLUSION

The predictive accuracy of the algorithm and the slope of the zero-point regression curve were higher for allogeneic than autologous PBPC collections. The predictive algorithm may be a useful tool in PBPC harvest, enabling the adaptation of the size of the apheresis to the needs of each patient.

Role of the CD34+ 38- cells in posttransplant hematopoietic recovery

Using three different statistical tests in parallel, we showed in a preliminary study that neither mononuclear cells, CD34+ 33+ or 33- cells, nor CD34+ 38+ cells significantly correlated with engraftment kinetics following autologous blood cell transplantation (ABCT). We additionally demonstrated here, in a series of patients suffering from malignant diseases, that the graft content in CD34+ 38- cells is individually a more sensitive indicator of the earliest, as well as the latest post-ABCT trilineage hematopoietic recovery than the colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage and even the total CD34+ cell content. This suggests that the CD34+ 38- cell population is itself subdivided into two more subsets, one being already lineage-committed and responsible for short-term engraftment, the other containing only very primitive hematopoietic cells responsible for sustained engraftment. Strong arguments favor the probability that these subsets correspond to HLA-DR+ and DR cells, respectively. We also defined an optimal threshold value of 0.05 x 10(6) CD34+ 38- cells/kg of the patient's body weight (b.w.) above which a rapid and sustained trilineage engraftment safely occurs. In fact, infusion of lower numbers of cells seems to have a more significant impact on long-term compared to short-term neutrophil recovery and on platelet kinetics engraftment. We additionally looked for the eventual influence on engraftment time of the type of disease, and of post-ABCT administration of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF). When the type of disease appeared to have no influence on the engraftment time, posttransplant HGF administration significantly reduced the time to trilineage engraftment in patients transplanted with < 0.05 x 10(6) CD34+ 38- cells, thus justifying it in case of reinfusion of low numbers of CD34+ 38- cells. On the other hand, the administration of HGF after infusion of more than 0.05 x 10(6) CD34+ 38- cells/kg b.w. did not hasten more, or only very little, the engraftment time, thus becoming not only unprofitable for the patients but costly as well.

Overview of autologous stem cell transplantation

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplants over the last decade. Faster recovery of cell counts, lesser transplant morbidity, shorter hospital stay and reduced cost compared with marrow autografts have been the main advantages of autologous peripheral blood cell over marrow transplants. In this paper we attempt to review the advances in the biology and mobilization of stem cells, and focus on clinical results of autologous peripheral stem cell and marrow transplants for disease specific sites such as breast cancer, myeloma, autoimmune diseases, germ cell tumors, the acute and chronic leukemias, the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease. We also discuss transplant related complications, gene therapy and the different methods of purging. This review was intended for autologous peripheral stem cell transplants, however, unavoidably, it also discusses autologous marrow transplantation and aspects common to both procedures.

A prospective, randomized, sequential, crossover trial of large-volume versus normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effect on progenitor cells and engraftment

BACKGROUND

The influence of leukapheresis size on the number of harvested peripheral blood progenitor cells is still unclear. A prospective randomized crossover trial was thus performed, to evaluate the effect of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) versus normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on progenitor cells and engraftment in 26 patients with breast cancer and 15 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were eligible for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either LVL on Day 1 and on Day 2 or vice versa. The number of progenitor cells was evaluated in the harvest and before and after leukapheresis in the peripheral blood.

RESULTS

The number of harvested CD34+ cells (4.8 x 10(6) vs. 3.4 x 10(6)/kg body weight, p < 0.001) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (3.1 x 10(5) vs. 2.4 x 10(5)/kg body weight, p = 0.0026) was significantly higher for LVL procedures than for NVL procedures. The median extraction efficacy, defined as the difference between the yield in the harvest and the decrease in the total number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood during leukapheresis, was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher for LVL than for NVL (2.6 x 10(8) and 8 x 10(7), respectively). In patients with breast cancer, the median amount of CD34+ cells in the harvest and the median extraction efficacy were higher for LVL than for NVL (p < 0.0001). This was not found for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

LVL results in a higher yield of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage than NVL, but only in patients with breast cancer and with high numbers of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood before leukapheresis.

Erythropoietin addition to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor abrogates life-threatening neutropenia and increases peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: results of a randomized comparison

PURPOSE AND METHODS

The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) treatment was compared in a randomized fashion with that of G-CSF treatment alone in promoting hematologic recovery and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent their first course of epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy during a phase II study of intensive outpatient ETP chemotherapy followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) late intensification with PBPC support.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of hematologic recovery of 50 randomized patients, after ETP chemotherapy, showed that life-threatening neutropenia occurred in 88% of the patients treated with G-CSF alone, whereas it occurred in only 4% of patients treated with G-CSF + EPO. Significantly different WBC and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) counts were observed in the two distinct arms on the day of WBC nadir (P <.0001 and P <.0001, respectively). Moreover, the addition of EPO to G-CSF increased PBPC mobilization and collection as compared with that in G-CSF-treated patients (P =.0009 and P =.0026, respectively), who required a significantly higher number of leukaphereses than G-CSF + EPO-treated patients (P =.0076) to obtain the planned minimum dose of PBPCs. Qualitative analysis by cloning assay of PBPCs collected in both arms revealed that G-CSF- and G-CSF + EPO-mobilized PBPCs have comparable in vitro functional properties.

CONCLUSION

This randomized comparison revealed that EPO significantly increases most of the hematologic effect produced by G-CSF administration after chemotherapy. This biologic property of EPO translated in vivo into a global improvement of patients' hematologic status.

Current aspects of biology, risk assessment, and treatment of neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma is one of the most intensely studied solid malignancies that affect the pediatric age groups; its clinical presentation, treatment strategies and ultimate prognosis vary greatly. The biologic and genetic character of each tumor has an important impact on disease behavior, and clinical staging now incorporates these factors to generate an overall therapy plan. The clinical presentation of neuroblastoma is related to primary tumor location, production of metabolically active substances, and the presence of metastatic disease. There are also prognostically important associated syndromes including opsoclonus-myoclonus, Horner's syndrome, neurofibromatosis, and a variety of other neurocristopathies. The histologic features of the tumor are of prognostic significance and are utilized in treatment stratification. The International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) has unified classic clinical staging. Features at diagnosis and those determined by initial operation are combined with biologic prognostic factors to achieve risk group assignment for virtually all patients. There are groups of children in which limited therapy is curative and intermediate-risk situations where standard multimodality treatment provides favorable outcomes. Unfortunately, there are many patients with high-risk disease that require intensive strategies, but success is still limited. It is in these most resistant patients that innovative approaches are being undertaken and novel strategies are being investigated.

Factors influencing platelet recovery after autologous transplantation of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells following myeloablative therapy in 50 heavily pretreated lymphoma patients

Delayed platelet recovery following autologous PBPCs transplantation after myeloablative therapy remains an unresolved problem in lymphoma patients heavily pretreated with several chemotherapy cycles and/or radiotherapy. In the present study of 50 lymphoma patients, the factors influencing platelet recovery after myeloablative therapy followed by autologous PBPCs transplantation were analysed retrospectively. The median age was 42 years (range, 15-58). Fourteen patients had HD and 36 had NHL (13 high-grade and 23 low-grade); most (80%) had stage III or IV. Twenty-two patients had received radiotherapy to various extents before mobilization. The mean number of previous chemotherapy cycles was seven (range 3-24) of different regimens (range 1-4). A median of three leukapheresis procedures (range 1-5) was performed after G-CSF mobilization. Single leukapheresis was sufficient in only one patient. A significant correlation was found between the BFU-E content of autografts and platelet recovery after transplantation. Neither the patient's age and sex nor the stage and grade of lymphoma had any effect on platelet recovery after transplantation. Neither the type of myeloablative therapy used or the dose of G-CSF administered after transplantation had any effect on platelet recovery after transplantation. The type of previous chemotherapy cycles was a major adverse factor affecting the progenitor cell yield in the autografts. Lymphoma patients previously treated with ASHAP and/or Dexa-BEAM cycles had less progenitor cell yield. The chemotherapeutic agents used in previous cycles also had a clear adverse effect on the progenitor cell yield in the autografts. Lymphoma patients previously treated with cycles including cytarabine and/or cisplatin showed significantly less progenitor cell yield and slower platelet recovery after transplantation. All seven patients with delayed platelet recovery had received cytarabine and/or cisplatin in several previous ASHAP and/or Dexa-BEAM cycles. All seven patients had a BFU-E count of less than 1 x 10(5)/kg yield in the autografts.

Primordial role of CD34+ 38- cells in early and late trilineage haemopoietic engraftment after autologous blood cell transplantation

In order to better define which cell subset contained in graft products might be the most predictive of haemopoietic recovery following autologous blood cell transplantation (ABCT), the relationships between the amounts of reinfused mononuclear cells (MNC), CFU-GM, total CD34+ cells and their CD33 and CD38 subsets. and the successive stages of trilineage engraftment kinetics, were studied in 45 cancer patients, using the Spearman correlation test, a linear regression model and a log-inverse model. No relationship was found between the infused numbers of MNC, CD33+ and CD33- subsets observed and the numbers of days to reach predetermined absolute neutrophil (ANC), platelet and reticulocyte counts. The infused numbers of CFU-GM, CD34+ and CD34+ 38+ cells correlated inconstantly with haemopoietic recovery parameters. The strongest and the most constant correlations were significantly observed between the infused numbers of CD34+ 38- cells and each trilineage engraftment parameter. The log-inverse model determined a threshold dose of 0.05 x 10(6) (= 5 x 10(4)) CD34+ 38- cells/kg, below which the trilineage engraftment kinetics were significantly slower and unpredictable. Post-transplant TBI-conditioning regimens increased the low cell dose-related delay of engraftment kinetics whereas post-transplant administration of haemopoietic growth factors (HGF) seemed to abrogate this delay. This would justify clinical use of HGF only in patients transplanted with CD34+ 38- cell amounts lower than the proposed threshold value. This study suggests that the CD34+ 38- subpopulation, although essentially participating in late complete haemopoietic recovery, is also composed of committed progenitor cells involved in early trilineage engraftment.

High CD34+ Cell Counts Decrease Hematologic Toxicity of Autologous Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation

Optimal numbers of CD34+ cells to be reinfused in patients undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy are still unknown. Hematologic reconstitution of 168 transplantations performed in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases was analyzed according to the number of CD34+ cells reinfused. The number of days from PBPC reinfusion until neutrophil recovery (>1.0 × 109/L) and unsustained platelet recovery (>50 × 109/L) were analyzed in three groups defined by the number of CD34+ cells reinfused: a low group with less than or equal to 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, a high group with greater than 15 × 106 CD34+cells/kg, and an intermediate group to which the former two groups were compared. The 22 low-group patients had a significantly delayed neutrophil (P < .0001) and platelet recovery (P < .0001). The 41 high-group patients experienced significantly shorter engraftment compared with the intermediate group with a median of 11 (range, 8 to 16) versus 12 (range, 7 to 17) days for neutrophil recovery (P = .003), and a median of 11 (range, 7 to 24) versus 14 (range, 8 to 180+) days for platelet recovery (P< .0001). These patients required significantly less platelet transfusions (P = .002). In a multivariate analysis, the amount of CD34+ cells reinfused was the only variable showing significance for neutrophil and platelet recovery. High-group patients had a shorter hospital stay (P = .01) and tended to need fewer days of antibotic administration (P = .12). In conclusion, these results suggest that reinfusion of greater than 15 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg after high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoproliferative diseases further shortens hematopoietic reconstitution, reduces platelet requirements, and may improve patients' quality of life.

High CD34+ Cell Counts Decrease Hematologic Toxicity of Autologous Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation

Optimal numbers of CD34+ cells to be reinfused in patients undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy are still unknown. Hematologic reconstitution of 168 transplantations performed in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases was analyzed according to the number of CD34+ cells reinfused. The number of days from PBPC reinfusion until neutrophil recovery (>1.0 × 109/L) and unsustained platelet recovery (>50 × 109/L) were analyzed in three groups defined by the number of CD34+ cells reinfused: a low group with less than or equal to 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, a high group with greater than 15 × 106 CD34+cells/kg, and an intermediate group to which the former two groups were compared. The 22 low-group patients had a significantly delayed neutrophil (P < .0001) and platelet recovery (P < .0001). The 41 high-group patients experienced significantly shorter engraftment compared with the intermediate group with a median of 11 (range, 8 to 16) versus 12 (range, 7 to 17) days for neutrophil recovery (P = .003), and a median of 11 (range, 7 to 24) versus 14 (range, 8 to 180+) days for platelet recovery (P< .0001). These patients required significantly less platelet transfusions (P = .002). In a multivariate analysis, the amount of CD34+ cells reinfused was the only variable showing significance for neutrophil and platelet recovery. High-group patients had a shorter hospital stay (P = .01) and tended to need fewer days of antibotic administration (P = .12). In conclusion, these results suggest that reinfusion of greater than 15 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg after high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoproliferative diseases further shortens hematopoietic reconstitution, reduces platelet requirements, and may improve patients' quality of life.

Growth factor administration following autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

Hematopoietic growth factor (HGF) administration following autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (APBPCT) is a current approach for shortening the duration of high-dose chemotherapy-induced transient peripheral pancytopenia. Several published clinical experiences and a retrospective study reported here show that recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) or recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) administration potentiates polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) and white blood cell (WBC) recovery with some clinical benefits mainly related to the reduction of infectious complications during the shortened period of neutropenia. However, this therapeutic strategy does not produce any enhancement of platelet (PLT) recovery or potentiation of red cell production. Conversely, a recent phase I/II study carried out in our institution showed that the combined administration of rhG-CSF and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) is able to potentiate trilineage hematopoietic recovery with a reduction of PLT transfusions and to considerably simplify the clinical management of patients as compared to patients treated with APBPCT alone. The post-APBPCT administration of rhEPO with rhGM-CSF decreased the number of days with WBC < 1 x 10(9)/L but failed to produce any appreciable effect on PLT recovery. Both combined treatments significantly reduced the patients' hospital stay and allowed the abrogation of systemic antibiotic administration following APBPCT. A further group of patients were treated with the combined administration of rhEPO, rhG-CSF and rhGM-CSF; they did not show a faster hematopoietic recovery than rhG-CSF plus EPO treated patients and a consistent hyperthermia was observed in most patients as a prominent side effect. Future prospective randomized studies will clarify the efficacy of HGF administration following APBPCT. Moreover, further improvements in the hematopoietic support of transplanted patients may be obtained when stem cell factor, flt3/flk2 tyrosine kinase ligands or megakaryocyte growth and development factor will become clinically available.

High-dose carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan (CEM) with peripheral blood progenitor cell support as late intensification for high-risk cancer: non-haematological, haematological toxicities and role of growth factor administration

The present report describes the non-haematological toxicity and the influence of growth factor administration on haematological toxicity and haematopoietic recovery observed after high-dose carboplatin (1200 mg m(-2)), etoposide (900 mg m(-2)) and melphalan (100 mg m(-2)) (CEM) followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) in 40 patients with high-risk cancer during their first-line treatment. PBPCs were collected during the previous outpatient induction chemotherapy programme by leukaphereses. CEM administration with PBPCT was associated with low non-haematological toxicity and the only significant toxicity consisted of a reversible grade III/IV increase in liver enzymes in 32% of the patients. Haematopoietic recovery was very fast in all patients and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) plus EPO after PBPCT significantly reduced haematological toxicity, abrogated antibiotic administration during neutropenia and significantly reduced hospital stay and patient's hospital charge compared with patients treated with PBPCT only. None of the patients died early of CEM plus PBPCT-related complications. Low non-haematological toxicity and accelerated haematopoietic recovery renders CEM with PBPC/growth factor support an acceptable therapeutic approach in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.

Improved priming for mobilization of and optimal timing for harvest of peripheral blood stem cells

The time of stem cell harvest and the mobilization regimen may play important roles in terms of achieving adequate numbers of stem cells by leukapheresis. To optimize the timing of leukapheresis, we have determined simultaneously the number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood as well as in the leukapheresis product of 214 apheresis procedures performed in 66 unselected patients with malignant hematologic diseases and solid tumors. A significant correlation between the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood and the leukapheresis product (R = 0.8) was found. The presence of more than 20 x 10(3)/ml blood CD34+ cells gave a sufficient yield (> or = 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) in 81% of the cases. In an attempt to compare two priming regimens, we performed leukapheresis twice in 12 patients with stable disease. In the first sequence, stem cells were mobilized with rhG-CSF (10 micrograms/kg/day) alone and, in the second sequence, with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) plus rhG-CSF. A significantly higher yield of CD34+ cells and a better correlation between CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and the leukapheresis product were found after priming with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF, compared with priming with rhG-CSF alone. In a multivariate analysis, three factors were found to correlate with the yield of CD34+ cells, namely prior chemotherapy, bone marrow function, and the mobilization regimen. The use of cyclophosphamide priming improves CD34+ mobilization, and the introduction of blood CD34+ level optimizes the timing for harvest of stem cells, which should be performed early during treatment of malignancies.

Cytokines and bone marrow transplantation

This article summarizes the various current uses of cytokines, and bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for cancer treatment. Interferons, interleukin-2 and hematopoietic growth factors are extensively used for the treatment of hematopoietic as well as nonhematopoietic malignancies, either as the main therapeutic agents or as an adjuvant. Research on gene therapy using cytokines is in progress. Stem cell transplantation is also discussed in the context of gene therapy of cancer. Gene therapy is expected to become a future modality in cancer treatment.

Autografting with blood progenitor cells: predictive value of preapheresis blood cell counts on progenitor cell harvest and correlation of the reinfused cell dose with hematopoietic reconstitution

One hundred and nine patients suffering from various malignancies underwent 285 apheresis procedures for PBPC collection. A median of two leukaphereses (range: 2-5) resulted in median numbers of 4.6 x 10(8) MNC/kg, 14.1 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg, and 6.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Preleukapheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cells correlated significantly with collected CD34+ cells/kg (r = 0.94; p < 0.0001) and with CFU-GM/kg (r = 0.52; p < 0.0001). A value > 4 x 10(4) CD34+ cells/ml was highly predictive for a collection yield > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg harvested by a single leukapheresis. Sixty patients were evaluated for hematologic reconstitution and engrafted in a median time of 10 days for WBC > 1.0 x 10(9)/l (range: 7-21 days), 10 days for ANC > 0.5 x 10(9)/l (7-20) and 11 days for PLT > 20 x 10(9)/l (7-62). Reinfused CD34+ cells/kg correlated significantly with hematologic engraftment (r = 0.44-0.52 and p < 0.006-0.001) as well as CFU-GM/kg (r = 0.36-0.44 and p < 0.007-0.001). A progenitor cell dose > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or > 8.0 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg led to a significantly faster recovery for WBC, ANC, and PLT when compared with patients receiving < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or < 8.0 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg. We conclude that rapid hematopoietic engraftment after high-dose therapy and PBPC reinfusion correlates well with a progenitor cell dose > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or > 8.0 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg, and that above a preleukapheresis threshold of 4 x 10(4) CD34+ cells/ml a PBPC autograft containing > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg can be collected by a single leukapheresis. We suggest that patients recovering from myelosuppression should be monitored for CD34+ cells in serial blood samples to determine the course of circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells. This issue will help to define the optimal time point to start apheresis and to predict a PBPC autograft harvested by a single leukapheresis, which will lead to rapid and stable hematopoietic reconstitution following transplantation.

Patterns of recovery phase infection after autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with malignancies. The Gruppo Italiano di Studio per la Manipolazione Cellulare in Ematologia

Recovery phase infection patterns in 55 patients who had undergone autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation (ABPCT) were evaluated retrospectively. The results were compared to those obtained in a group of 41 patients who received autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Fever related to documented or suspected infection developed in 38 of 55 patients in the ABPCT group and in 37 of 41 in the ABMT group (p < 0.05). The percentages of patients with positive blood cultures did not differ significantly (ABPCT, 8/55 vs. ABMT, 8/41, p > 0.05). However, fewer acquired systemic fungal infections (1/55 vs. 5/41, p < 0.05) as well as fewer days of antibiotic usage were observed in the ABPCT group.