Effect of CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinaemic patients intolerant of bromocriptine

How to manage intolerance to dopamine agonist in patients with prolactinoma

PURPOSE

Dopamine agonists (DA) are the gold-standard for prolactinoma and hyperprolactinemia treatment. Intolerance to DA leading to drug drop out occurs in 3 to 12% of cases. We provide here a review of published data about DA intolerance and present a case report concerning the use of intravaginal cabergoline.

METHODS

We review the literature on the definition, the pathogenesis, frequency and management of DA intolerance. In addition, the review provides strategies to enhance tolerability and avoid precocious clinical treatment withdrawal.

RESULTS

Cabergoline is often cited as the most tolerable DA and its side effects tend to ameliorate within days to weeks. Restarting the same drug at a lower dose or switching to another DA can be used in cases of intolerance. The vaginal route can be tried specifically if there are gastrointestinal side effects in the oral administration. Symptomatic treatment could be attempted, although mainly based on a strategy used in other diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to limited data, no guidelines have been developed for the management of intolerance in DA treatment. The most frequent management is to perform transsphenoidal surgery. Nevertheless, this manuscript provides data derived from published literature and expert opinion, suggesting new approaches to this clinical issue.

Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinemia is a common endocrine disorder that can be associated with significant morbidity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of outcomes of hyperprolactinemic patients, including microadenomas and macroadenomas, to provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners. Through this review, we aimed to compare efficacy and adverse effects of medications, surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases, reviewed bibliographies of included articles, and contacted experts in the field. Eligible studies provided longitudinal follow-up of patients with hyperprolactinemia and evaluated outcomes of interest. We collected descriptive, quality and outcome data (tumor growth, visual field defects, infertility, sexual dysfunction, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea and prolactin levels).

RESULTS

After review, 8 randomized and 178 nonrandomized studies (over 3,000 patients) met inclusion criteria. Compared to no treatment, dopamine agonists significantly reduced prolactin level (weighted mean difference, -45; 95% confidence interval, -77 to -11) and the likelihood of persistent hyperprolactinemia (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.99). Cabergoline was more effective than bromocriptine in reducing persistent hyperprolactinemia, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea, and galactorrhea. A large body of noncomparative literature showed dopamine agonists improved other patient-important outcomes. Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports improved outcomes with surgery and radiotherapy compared to no treatment in patients who were resistant to or intolerant of dopamine agonists.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide evidence to support the use of dopamine agonists in reducing prolactin levels and persistent hyperprolactinemia, with cabergoline proving more efficacious than bromocriptine. Radiotherapy and surgery are useful in patients with resistance or intolerance to dopamine agonists.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas and are an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility. The ultimate goal of therapy for prolactinomas is restoration or achievement of eugonadism through the normalization of hyperprolactinemia and control of tumor mass. Medical therapy with dopamine agonists is highly effective in the majority of cases and represents the mainstay of therapy. Recent data indicating successful withdrawal of these agents in a subset of patients challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is a lifelong requirement. Complicated situations, such as those encountered in resistance to dopamine agonists, pregnancy, and giant or malignant prolactinomas, may require multimodal therapy involving surgery, radiotherapy, or both. Progress in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of prolactinomas may enable future development of novel molecular therapies for treatment-resistant cases. This review provides a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of the various modes of therapy available for the treatment of patients with prolactinomas with an emphasis on challenging situations, a discussion of the data regarding withdrawal of medical therapy, and a foreshadowing of novel approaches to therapy that may become available in the future.

Hyperprolactinemia: pathophysiology and management

Hyperprolactinemia is commonly found in both female and male patients with abnormal sexual and/or reproductive function or with galactorrhea. If serum prolactin levels are above 200 microg/L, a prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma (prolactinoma) is the underlying cause, but if levels are lower, differential diagnoses include the intake of various drugs, compression of the pituitary stalk by other pathology, hypothyroidism, renal failure, cirrhosis, chest wall lesions, or idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. When a pituitary tumor is present, patients often have pressure symptoms in addition to endocrine dysfunction, such as headaches, visual field defects, or cranial nerve deficits. The large majority of patients with prolactinomas, both micro- and macroprolactinomas, can be successfully treated with dopaminergic drugs as first-line treatment, with normalization of prolactin secretion and gonadal function, and with significant tumor shrinkage in a high percentage of cases. Surgical resection of the prolactinoma is the option for patients who may refuse or do not respond to long-term pharmacological therapy. Radiotherapy and/or estrogens are also reasonable choices if surgery fails. In patients with asymptomatic microprolactinoma no treatment needs to be given and a regular follow-up with serial prolactin measurements and pituitary imaging should be organized. Currently, the most commonly used dopamine agonists are bromocriptine, pergolide, quinagolide and cabergoline. When comparing the plasma half-life, efficacy and tolerability of these drugs, cabergoline seems to have the most favorable profile, followed by quinagolide. Ifprolactin levels are well controlled with dopamine agonist therapy, gradual tapering of the dose to the lowest effective amount is recommended, and in a number of cases medication can be stopped after several years. Evidence to date suggests that cabergoline and quinagolide appear to have a good safety profile for women who wish to conceive, but hard evidence proving that dopamine agonists do not provoke congenital malformations when taken during early pregnancy is currently only available for bromocriptine. Once pregnant, dopamine agonist therapy should be immediately stopped, unless growth of a macroprolactinoma is likely or pressure symptoms occur. At our institution patients with symptomatic prolactinomas, both micro- and macroadenomas, are treated with cabergoline as the first-line aproach. In the small group of patients who do not respond to this treatment, or who refuse long-term therapy, surgery is offered. Radiotherapy is given if both pharmacologic therapy and surgery fail.

Dopamine receptor agonists for treating prolactinomas

Prolactinomas are the most common hormone-secreting pituitary tumours and cause infertility and gonadal and sexual dysfunction in both sexes. The approach to prolactinomas has changed in the last 25 years thanks to the availability of dopaminergic drugs characterised by a potent prolactin-inhibitory effect, a tumour shrinking effect associated with a satisfactory tolerability. In more recent years, cabergoline 1-[(6-allelylergolin-8beta-yl)carbonyl]-1-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]-3-ethyl-urea an ergoline derivative with potent, selective and long-lasting inhibitory activity on prolactin release, has been used to suppress prolactin secretion in women with hyperprolactinaemia. Cabergoline was shown to be significantly more effective than bromocriptine in inducing a complete biochemical response and clinical efficacy and was better tolerated than bromocriptine in the majority of patients. Notable tumour shrinkage until tumour disappearance was observed during cabergoline treatment in most patients with macroprolactinoma and it was also proven effective in patients resistant to or with a poor response to bromocriptine. In view of the limited data on cabergoline-associated pregnancies and the long half-life of the drug, it is currently recommended that women hoping to become pregnant, once ovulatory cycles have been established, should discontinue cabergoline therapy 1 month before they intend to conceive. However, no data concerning negative effects on pregnancy or offspring have been reported. The great efficacy of this compound together with its excellent tolerability makes this drug the current treatment of choice for the majority of patients with hyperprolactinaemic disorders.

Cabergoline

Cabergoline (CAB) (1-[(6-allelylergolin-8 beta-yl)carbonyl]-1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethyl-urea) is an ergoline derivative with potent, selective and long-lasting inhibitory activity on prolactin (PRL) secretion acting on dopamine receptors present in pituitary lactotrophes. Receptor binding studies have demonstrated that CAB has high in vitro selectivity and affinity for the subtype D2 of the dopamine receptor. In cultures of rat anterior pituitary cells, the concentrations of CAB and bromocriptine required to inhibit PRL secretory activity by 50% (IC50) were 0.1 and 3.4 nmol/l, respectively. As compared to bromocriptine, CAB was more potent in inhibiting the binding of [3H]N-n-propylnorapomorphine and it occupied the receptor for longer. These effects were observed in all areas of the rat brain. In vivo, CAB at doses of 0.125-1 mg twice weekly caused a dose-dependent suppression of PRL secretion in women with hyperprolactinaemia. CAB was shown to be significantly more effective than bromocriptine in inducing a complete biochemical response and clinical efficacy and was better tolerated than bromocriptine in the majority of patients. Notable tumour shrinkage until tumour disappearance was observed during CAB treatment in most patients with macroprolactinoma. CAB was also shown to be effective in patients resistant or poorly responsive to bromocriptine. In view of the limited data on CAB-associated pregnancies and the long half-life of the drug, it is currently recommended that women seeking to became pregnant, once ovulatory cycles have been established, should discontinue CAB therapy 1 month before they intend to conceive. However, no data on negative effects on pregnancy or offspring have been reported. The great efficacy of CAB together with its excellent tolerability makes this drug the current treatment of choice for the majority of patients with hyperprolactinaemic disorders. Very recently, the efficacy of CAB treatment has been reported in patients with acromegaly and clinically non-functioning adenomas with controversial results. CAB was also reported to have some efficacy in patients with Nelson's syndrome and Cushing's disease although these data are available only for limited case reports.

Medical therapy for acromegaly

Both somatostatin analogues, which bind to the somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5, and dopamine agonists, which are specific for the D2 receptor, have been used to treat acromegaly. Each of these classes of drugs contains several compounds that vary in duration of action, efficacy, and side effect profile. Although somatostatin analogues reduce GH levels and alleviate symptoms in most patients and restore IGF-1 levels to normal in 60% to 65% of patients, tumor shrinkage is limited to 40% of patients. evidence in the literature supports the use of these medications as secondary therapy in patients with acromegaly who have had surgery and who continue to have elevated GH levels (above 2 ng/mL during an oral glucose tolerance test) with or without IGF-1 concentrations that are above the upper limit of normal for age. In addition, medical therapy indicated in patients who refuse surgery and in patients who are poor surgical candidates. The controversial question is whether medical therapy should be an option for primary treatment of the acromegalic patient. Currently, ther are no data from prospective randomized trials comparing the effects of surgery versus somatostatin analogues as first-line therapy for for newly diagnosed acromegalic patients. Limited data from nonrandomized studies demonstrate that somatostatin analogues are effective long-term in suppressing GH and reducing IGF-1 into the normal range in approximately two-thirds of patients who have never undergone previous treatment. It is still the consensus that patients with GH-secreting microadenomas should undergo surgical resection, because the likelihood of complete cure by an experience neurosurgeon is high, at least 70% or greater. Successful surgical treatment has the advantage of completely removing the tumor in contrast to medical therapy, which rarely produces shrinkage greater than 50% despite the fact that IGF-1 and GH levels may be normal. In patients with macroadenomas of a size and location that suggest that the chance of complete resection is 40% or less, primary treatment with a somatostatin analogue should be considered as one option in the initial management of the patient. Another option in such an individual would be surgical debulking followed by medical therapy, because it is theoretically possible that biochemical cure with medical therapy after surgical debulking might be achieved with lower doses. The cost-effectiveness of these approaches has not yet been determined. Once the decision has been made to begin medical therapy, a choice must be made between dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues. Most evidence suggests that somatostatin analogues are more effective than dopamine agonists and therefore would be the therapy of choice. In select patients, dopamine agonists, particularly the long-acting agonist cabergoline, may be preferred initially if the patient is unwilling to take injections or if the GH elevations are relatively modest (< 10 ng/mL). Biochemical cure should be assessed by measurement of GH (which can be performed 2 hours after an octreotide injection) and IGF-1 concentrations. The goal of treatment include reduction of of GH below 2 ng/mL and reduction of IGF-1 into the normal range. In patients who do not reach these goals, the dose or frequency of injection of the somatostatin analogue or both should be increased. If such measures are unsuccessful, a dopamine agonist may be added to the medical regimen because some studies suggest that combination therapy may be more effective in select cases than octreotide therapy alone. If such measures are still unsuccessful, other options should be considered, including surgery, pituitary radiation, and medical treatment with investigational drugs.

Treatment of prolactinomas

The objectives of the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia are to suppress excessive hormone secretion and its clinical consequences, to remove tumour mass, to preserve the residual pituitary function and to prevent disease recurrence or progression. Prior to the advent of pharmacotherapy, therapy usually consisted of surgical resection and/or pituitary irradiation. In microprolactinomas, trans-sphenoidal surgical resection normalizes prolactin (PRL) levels, restores normal menses and produces the disappearance of galactorrhoea in a great majority of patients, but normalization of serum PRL levels varies from 35-70%. In macroprolactinomas, trans-sphenoidal surgery is less successful with only 32% of patients appearing to be cured initially. However, the recurrence rate is 19%, and the long-term cure rate is only 26%. In more than 80% of the patients with microprolactinoma, suppression of PRL levels and tumour shrinkage can be achieved with bromocriptine therapy given at doses of 2.5-5 mg per day. In 5-10% of the patients, the appearance of side-effects (nausea, dizziness and postural hypotension) is a limiting factor in continuing the treatment. Dopaminergic compounds cause notable tumour shrinkage in most macroprolactinomas. Treatment with cabergoline, a selective and long-lasting dopamine 2-receptor agonist at weekly doses of 0.5-2 mg has been shown to be effective both in normalizing PRL levels and in inducing tumour shrinkage. Pharmacotherapy with dopamine (DA) agonists is an appropriate first-line treatment for both micro- and macroprolactinomas. Surgery should be recommended for those patients who are severely intolerant of or resistant to DA agonists.

Quinagolide efficacy and tolerability in hyperprolactinaemic patients who are resistant to or intolerant of bromocriptine

OBJECTIVE

To audit the efficacy of quinagolide (CV205-502, Norprolac, Sandoz) in lowering prolactin, and its tolerability, in patients with bromocriptine resistance (BCR) or bromocriptine intolerance (BCI), in view of the paucity of results published in patients specifically with BCR or BCI, by collating results in our own patients with the reports in the literature.

DESIGN

Open prospective, uncontrolled administration of quinagolide in patients with BCR (defined for this report as failure to attain normal prolactin levels after 4 months of bromocriptine at maximum tolerated doses), or BCI (defined as a patient request to cease bromocriptine treatment because of side-effects at doses that were required, or failed, to normalize PRL levels).

MEASUREMENTS

Prolactin levels, menses or pregnancy, and side-effects.

PATIENTS

Six with BCR, and six with BCI (microprolactinoma in 7, macroprolactinoma in 5), treated with quinagolide 75 micrograms nightly increasing incrementally to a maximum of 450 micrograms. One patient who had taken part in a multicentre study of quinagolide in macroprolactinomas had BCI, and 11 further patients in the endocrine clinic who had BCR or BCI were offered quinagolide therapy under named-patient compassionate arrangements.

RESULTS

Normal prolactin in 4/5 with BCR (3/6 with side-effects, none of them quinagolide intolerant), and normal prolactin in 2/6 with BCI (4/6 with side-effects, two of them quinagolide intolerant).

CONCLUSIONS

Results in our 12 patients are broadly in line with those in 51 patients with bromocriptine resistance and 39 with bromocriptine intolerance extracted from various published reports, which together suggest that prolactin can be normalized in 16% of patients with bromocriptine resistance by quinagolide in doses of 225 micrograms or less, and in a further 20% by higher doses up to 600 micrograms. In bromocriptine intolerance, prolactin was normalized by quinagolide in doses of 225 micrograms or less in 58% of published cases and in 3 more patients by higher doses up to 1050 micrograms. About half the patients with bromocriptine resistance or bromocriptine intolerance who are treated with quinagolide experience side-effects, and around 7% are quinagolide intolerant. Doses need not exceed 225 micrograms, until failure to respond at this dose level is demonstrated.

Positive response to compound CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinemic patients resistant to or intolerant of bromocriptine

The clinical effects of CV 205-502, a potent and non-ergot-derived dopamine agonist, were investigated in 24 selected patients with hyperprolactinemia previously treated with standard oral bromocriptine, the slow-release oral form of bromocriptine (BRC-SRO) and/or the long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine (BRC-LAR); 14 were chosen because of their resistance to treatment and ten because they were intolerant of the different forms of bromocriptine. A macroprolactinoma was present in seven patients and a microprolactinoma in ten, whereas seven had no radiological images of a pituitary tumor and were classified as having non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. All the 24 patients were treated with CV 205-502 at a daily dose of 0.075-0.6 mg for 3-12 months. All the patients had gonadal dysfunction and galactorrhea. Basal serum prolactin values ranged from 70 to 1677 ng/ml. CV 205-502 was effective in 11 of the 14 patients resistant bromocriptine, BRC-SRO and BRC-LAR; serum prolactin levels became normal within 6 months and a tumor shrinkage was obtained in five of the seven macroprolactinomas. In general, the drug was effective and well tolerated. Only three patients (two resistant and one intolerant) manifested nausea, vomiting and postural hypotension. In conclusion, this study shows that CV 205-502 is effective in bromocriptine-resistant hyperprolactinemic patients. Furthermore, CV 205-502 has insignificant and tolerable side-effects in patients intolerant of bromocriptine. CV 205-502 can, therefore, be considered a useful and effective drug, and an interesting therapeutic alternative to the ergot-derived dopamine-agonist drugs in use today.

Acute overdose of a new dopamine agonist, CV 205-502

CV 205-502 is a new dopamine agonist used for hyperprolactinaemia. We report a case of acute overdose (one month treatment, i.e. 2.25 mg) in a 25-year-old male patient. Clinical symptoms were restricted to nausea and mild hypotension. Treatment consisting of ipeca cuanha, charcoal and intravenous fluids allowed a rapid, successful outcome. This case illustrates the particular features of CV 205-502 intoxication when compared to other dopamine agonists, pointing out the tolerance of the drug which can be considered for wider indications and safer prescriptions.

Benign intracranial hypertension associated with the withdrawal of a non-ergot dopamine agonist

The cases are reported of two patients who developed benign intracranial hypertension after the withdrawal of the novel non-ergot derived dopamine agonist CV 205 502 (quinagolide).

CV 205-502 in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states

CV 205-502 (octahydrobenzol[g]quinoline), a non-ergot dopamine agonist drug, was administered to 40 patients with hyperprolactinemic syndrome: 16 patients with macroprolactinoma, 14 with microprolactinoma and 10 with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Twenty-four out of 40 patients had previously been treated by surgery and/or bromocriptine, with variable results. All had gonadal dysfunction and 22 patients had galactorrhea. Eight patients with macroprolactinoma had defects of the visual field. Pre-treatment serum PRL levels ranged from 60 to 2050 micrograms/l. The daily dose of CV 205-502 used in this trial ranged from 0.075 to 0.600 mg. After 6-12 months of treatment, serum PRL level decreased in all the patients reaching normoprolactinemia in 31 of them (77.5%) who demonstrated restoration of menses and disappearance of galactorrhea. The remaining nine patients (22.5%) had only a decrease of PRL levels without reaching normoprolactinemia and without any clinical effect. In 12 out of 16 patients with macroprolactinoma not previously surgically treated, a significant tumor shrinkage was shown by means of Computed Tomography and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The disappearance of visual defects was obtained in four out of eight patients. CV 205-502 was tolerated satisfactorily: mild side-effects occurred in four patients in the first week of treatment and spontaneously disappeared, whereas six patients (15%) needed to withdraw the therapy after 6 months because of side-effects. In conclusion CV 205-502 is a potent and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states and is an effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in use today.

A cross-over study with the two novel dopaminergic drugs cabergoline and quinagolide in hyperprolactinemic patients

Cabergoline and quinagolide, two new dopamine agonist drugs with long-lasting activity, are currently under investigation for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. At present, studies comparing these drugs for tolerability and efficacy in the same patients are lacking. It was our aim to make such a comparison in an open randomized cross-over trial. Cabergoline (0.5 mg twice weekly) and quinagolide (75 micrograms once daily) were given orally. Each drug was administered for 12 weeks. Treatment with the second drug was started after the recurrence of hyperprolactinemia. Twelve women with hyperprolactinemia due to idiopathic disease (n = 6), microprolactinoma (n = 5) or postsurgical empty sella (n = 1) were evaluated. Six women were amenorrheic and 6 were oligomenorrheic. Ten had spontaneous or provoked galactorrhea. Baseline characteristics (age, clinical signs and PRL levels) of patients initially allocated to the two treatment groups were similar. Nine patients completed both treatment cycles and PRL levels were lower under cabergoline (10.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/L) than under quinagolide (25.0 +/- 7.7 micrograms/L; p < 0.05). One patient discontinued cabergoline because of dryness of the eyes after having completed the quinagolide cycle and 2 patients initially treated with cabergoline discontinued quinagolide because of gastrointestinal symptoms. After completion of the first treatment cycle, the time of recurrence of hyperprolactinemia was significantly longer after cabergoline (14 +/- 7 weeks) than after quinagolide (5 +/- 1 weeks; p < 0.05). At week 12, normal PRL levels (< 20 micrograms/L) were observed in 10 and 6 women during cabergoline and quinagolide, respectively. Only one case was resistant to both drugs. The clinical effects of the two treatments were similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The efficacy and tolerability of long-term cabergoline therapy in hyperprolactinaemic disorders: an open, uncontrolled, multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Study Group

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the efficacy and safety of the new, long-acting dopamine agonist drug cabergoline during long-term therapy of hyperprolactinaemia.

DESIGN

Open, prospective, multicentre study.

PATIENTS

One hundred and sixty-two females with either a microprolactinoma (n = 100), idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia (n = 54), empty sella syndrome (n = 7) or residual hyperprolactinaemia after surgery for a macroprolactinoma (n = 1). All had previously been treated with cabergoline or placebo for 4 weeks as part of a dose-finding study.

MEASUREMENTS

Menstrual pattern, adverse symptoms, blood pressure and pulse, serum PRL, blood count, liver and renal function were assessed after one month and subsequently at two-monthly intervals.

RESULTS

Treatment was started at doses of 0.25 mg (n = 3), 0.5 mg (n = 8), 1 mg (n = 150) or 2 mg (n = 1) per week, given either as a single weekly dose (n = 8) or divided into twice-weekly doses (n = 154), and was continued for at least 49 weeks in 123 patients. Final treatment doses ranged from 0.25 mg fortnightly to 2 mg twice weekly: most patients finished the study taking 0.5 mg once (n = 31) or twice (n = 77) weekly. Stable normalization of PRL levels was achieved in 138 subjects (85%), in 129 of whom the effective dose was < 1 mg per week. In the subset of 114 patients completing 49 weeks of therapy and having dose adjustments according to the protocol, the biochemical success rate was 92%. Fifty-nine of the 65 previously amenorrhoeic women (91%) and 44 of the 49 (90%) who were previously oligomenorrhoeic resumed regular menses and/or became pregnant during the study. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (39.5%). In 84% of cases with adverse events, the symptoms were of mild or moderate severity and most occurred during the first few weeks of therapy; five patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of poor tolerance. The most frequent symptoms were dizziness (13% of patients), headache (13%), nausea (10%) and weakness and/or fatigue (10%). Of 27 patients who had previously been poorly tolerant of other dopamine agonists, 17 (63%) did not experience any side-effects and only one was intolerant of cabergoline. No adverse haematological or biochemical effects were detected except for a slight downward trend in haemoglobin which may have been related to the resumption of regular menses in previously amenorrhoeic or oligomenorrhoeic women. A mild hypotensive effect was observed, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures falling by 5 and 4 mmHg respectively during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence for the long-term effectiveness and safety of cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia. Its ability to normalize PRL and restore gonadal function compares favourably with reported data on reference compounds while its tolerability profile and simple administration schedule offer potential advantages in terms of patient acceptability.

CV 205-502 treatment of macroprolactinomas

CV 205-502, a benzoquinoline, is a new nonergot dopamine agonist compound which has been shown to be effective in lowering PRL levels in normal volunteers and in hyperprolactinemic women. Seven patients (4 men and 3 women) presenting with hyperprolactinemia due to macroprolactinoma were treated with CV 205-502 given as a single daily dose at bedtime for up to 12 months. Six patients presented with impaired gonadal function and 2 with galactorrhea. All patients but one had previously been treated with bromocriptine and 4 had undergone pituitary surgery (3 with complementary radiotherapy). Six patients responded within a few weeks to CV 205-502 treatment, PRL levels being normalized (4 patients, 0.075 to 0.150 mg/day) or significantly reduced to restore normal gonadal function (2 patients, 0.225 mg/day). The seventh patient, who had previously been resistant to bromocriptine, also failed to respond to CV 205-502 treatment even after high doses (0.450 mg/day). Under CV 205-502 treatment, follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging revealed a reduction in tumor size of up to 52% of the initial volume in the "PRL-responders" whereas an increase in tumor size was observed in the "nonresponding" patient. No biological disturbance appeared during CV 205-502 treatment and the drug tolerance was very good, with mild side-effects being reported by only 2 patients. In conclusion, CV 205-502, given once daily, appears to be a safe and effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in the treatment of macroprolactinoma, by reducing hyperprolactinemia and tumor size. It was, however, of no benefit in the one patient whose macroprolactinoma had been resistant to bromocriptine.

CV 205-502, a new dopamine agonist, versus bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia

Forty-seven hyperprolactinaemic patients with serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations persistently above 1500 mU/l were treated with the new dopamine agonist CV 205-502 or bromocriptine in a prospective, randomized and double-blind fashion during a 24-week period. Two women had to be excluded because of poor compliance in the first month. Therefore 45 patients remained for evaluation. 81% of the patients in the CV 205-502 group and 70% of the patients in the bromocriptine group normalized their prolactin levels within the study period with a treatment dose as permitted in this protocol. In general serum prolactin normalized within 8 to 12 weeks of treatment. There were no differences between the two tested drugs regarding restoration of the menstrual cycle or disappearance of galactorrhoea. Both drugs gave rise to adverse reactions, especially during the initiation of therapy. However, the adverse reactions reported during CV 205-502 treatment were less severe and persistent than those attributed to bromocriptine. Patient acceptance of the new drug with regard to tolerability was judged by 90% of the women in that treatment group as very good or good, while 75% of those treated with bromocriptine evaluated its tolerability as very good or good. We conclude that CV 205-502 is highly effective in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia with concomitant restoration of gonadal function and prevention of galactorrhoea. The tolerability of the drug seems better than of bromocriptine and therefore this drug is of value in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemic patients.

Treatment of macroprolactinomas with a new non-ergot, long-acting dopaminergic drug, CV 205-502

Eleven patients with prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas were treated with the new non-ergot, long-acting dopamine agonist, CV 205-502, for a period of 2-18 months (mean 11 months). Tumour volumes ranged from 1.9 to 64 ml in seven patients who were newly diagnosed, and from 0.1 to 3.1 ml in four patients who had been treated for macroprolactinomas by oral bromocriptine or depot bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR). Plasma prolactin values ranged from 3.5 to 360 U/l before institution of CV 205-502 treatment in these 11 patients. The following observations were made: (1) plasma prolactin values fell dramatically in all patients, and values within the normal range were obtained in five patients at once-daily doses of CV 205-502 between 0.075 and 0.300 mg; (2) tumour size reduction was obtained in all patients with macroadenomas on pretreatment CT scans. Tumour reduction was associated with the development of a partial empty sella in five patients, and with visualization of the pituitary in six cases; (3) bitemporal hemianopia (five patients) disappeared in four patients and improved in one patient. Oculomotor palsy receded in one patient; (4) signs of anterior pituitary insufficiency improved or normalized in most cases affected; (5) mild nausea or dizziness during the first days of CV 205-502 treatment and/or during several days after a dose increase were observed in three patients. We conclude that CV 205-502 in a once daily dose is an effective and safe alternative in the long-term treatment of macroprolactinomas.

Dopaminergic treatments for hyperprolactinaemia

Hyperprolactinaemia is a frequent cause of anovulatory sterility, although spontaneous pregnancy may occur occasionally. Dopaminergic treatment is highly effective for the treatment of both idiopathic and tumoral hyperprolactinaemia. If the only cause of infertility is chronic anovulation due to hyperprolactinaemia, an 80% pregnancy rate can be anticipated. Because of these results, surgical treatment is still needed only rarely. Pregnancy, either spontaneous or drug-related, is usually uneventful for the mother and is not associated with any increase in abortion, twins or malformations. Pregnancy-related tumour growth occurs rarely and can be treated successfully with dopaminergic drugs. On the contrary, there is more frequently improvement after pregnancy of the biochemical and clinical disorders associated with hyperprolactinaemia.