Role of cholinergic muscarinic pathways on the free fatty acid inhibition of GH responses to GHRH in normal men

Growth-hormone response to combined stimulation with GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome before and after short-term fasting

Controversial data were reported on GH response to different provocative stimuli in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of our study was to assess the effect of short-term fasting on GH response to combined stimulus with GHRH+GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in obese patients with PCOS and possible relation with leptin and insulin changes during fasting. Twelve obese PCOS women and nine obese control women participated in 3-day fasting. GH response, IGF-I, insulin and leptin were measured after GHRH+ GHRP-6, before and after short-term fasting. Obese PCOS patients had significantly greater GH peak after GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting. Enhanced response to GH stimulation was found after fasting without substantial differences between obese PCOS and obese controls. Insulin and leptin significantly decreased, while insulin sensitivity significantly improved in both groups during fasting. In conclusion, obese PCOS patients have peculiar type of GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting, possibly due to enhanced sensitivity of somatotrophs. Observed changes in insulin and leptin may participate in modulation of enhanced GH response after short-term fasting to GHRH+GHRP-6 in PCOS and obese controls.

Cholinergic modulation of growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Hypothalamic cholinergic neurotransmission plays a major role in the regulation of GH secretion. Pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, is able to decrease hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone and release GH in normal subjects. Blockade of muscarinic receptor with pirenzepine blunts the GH release in several clinical situations. However, little information is available on the role played by central cholinergic pathways in GH regulation in uraemic patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess GH responses to GHRH after pretreatment with pyridostigmine and pirenzepine in a group of uraemic patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). GH responses of the patients treated with recombinant human erythropeitin (rhEPO) were compared to patients without treatment.

DESIGN

We studied 14 male patients on PD and nine control subjects. All subjects underwent three endocrine test in random order after an overnight fast. Each subject received GHRH (100 microg, i.v. in bolus at 0 minutes). Sixty minutes before the injection of GHRH subjects were given oral placebo, pyridostigmine (120 mg), or pirenzepine (100 mg).

MEASUREMENTS

Blood samples for GH were collected at -60, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes The hormonal secretory responses were studied by a time-averaged (area under the curves, AUC) and time-independent (peak values) analysis.

RESULTS

Baseline GH concentrations were similar in patients and controls. GH responses to placebo plus GHRH were also comparable in patients and controls (peak 26.6 +/- 3.8 vs. 33.2 +/- 4.4 mU/l, AUC 28.2 +/- 3.4 vs. 27.8 +/- 4.6 mU/h/l). Pyridostigmine administration induced a significant potentiation of GH responses to GHRH both in patients (peak 43.2 +/- 5.2 mU/l, AUC 47.6 +/- 6.0 mU/h/l; P < 0.01) and in control subjects (peak 79.2 +/- 8.6 mU/l, AUC 78.0 +/- 9.4 mU/h/l; P < 0.01). However, the increment in GH peak and AUC was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in controls in relation to values found in patients. Pirenzepine administration induced an abolishment of GH release after GHRH stimulation both in PD patients (peak 5.4 +/- 2.6 mU/l, AUC 6.0 +/- 2.4 mU/h/l; P < 0.01) and in healthy controls (peak 3.8 +/- 0.6 mU/l, AUC 4.0 +/- 0.4 mU/h/l; P < 0.05). Responses to pyridostigmine plus GHRH and pirenzepine plus GHRH were similar in patients on chronic therapy with recombinant human erythropeitin and in patients without rhEPO therapy.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the cholinergic regulation of GH release is preserved in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis. The significantly lower increase in GH response to GHRH induced by pyridostigmine suggests that cholinergic stimulatory tone is attenuated in patients in relation to control subjects. Long-term therapy with rhEPO seems not to affect GH responses to cholinergic stimulation or blockade.

Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is regulated through a complex neuroendocrine control system, especially by the functional interplay of two hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS), exerting stimulatory and inhibitory influences, respectively, on the somatotrope. The two hypothalamic neurohormones are subject to modulation by a host of neurotransmitters, especially the noradrenergic and cholinergic ones and other hypothalamic neuropeptides, and are the final mediators of metabolic, endocrine, neural, and immune influences for the secretion of GH. Since the identification of the GHRH peptide, recombinant DNA procedures have been used to characterize the corresponding cDNA and to clone GHRH receptor isoforms in rodent and human pituitaries. Parallel to research into the effects of SS and its analogs on endocrine and exocrine secretions, investigations into their mechanism of action have led to the discovery of five separate SS receptor genes encoding a family of G protein-coupled SS receptors, which are widely expressed in the pituitary, brain, and the periphery, and to the synthesis of analogs with subtype specificity. Better understanding of the function of GHRH, SS, and their receptors and, hence, of neural regulation of GH secretion in health and disease has been achieved with the discovery of a new class of fairly specific, orally active, small peptides and their congeners, the GH-releasing peptides, acting on specific, ubiquitous seven-transmembrane domain receptors, whose natural ligands are not yet known.

GH secretion in Prader-Labhard-Willi syndrome: somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH is enhanced by arginine but not by pyridostigmine

Low somatotrope responsiveness to secretagogues has been reported in patients affected by Prader-Labhard-Willi Syndrome (PLWS). In normal subjects, GH response to GHRH is known to be greatly potentiated to the same extent by pyridostigmine (PD) or arginine (ARG) which probably act via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To clarify somatotrope responsiveness in 7 PLWS patients, we studied GH response to GHRH alone and to GHRH combined with PD or ARG. Eight normal short children were studied as controls (NC). GH response to GHRH in PLWS was lower than in NC (AUC: 615 +/- 205 micrograms/l.h, vs 1271 +/- 333 micrograms/l.h, p < 0.02). In NC, the GHRH-induced GH rise was potentiated to the same extent by PD or ARG. In contrast, in PLWS PD failed to increase the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 615 +/- 205 micrograms/l.h vs 621 +/- 176 micrograms/l.h, n.s.) which was enhanced by ARG (AUC: 615 +/- 205 micrograms/l.h vs 1633 +/- 425 micrograms/l.h, p < 0.02). However, the GH response to GHRH + ARG in PLWS was lower than in NC. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that in PLWS the low somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH is not enhanced by cholinergic potentiation while it is increased by arginine.

Long-term administration of acipimox potentiates growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone by decreasing serum free fatty acid in obesity

Obesity is associated with an impairment of normal growth hormone (GH) secretion and blunted responses to all stimuli. A high plasma free fatty acid (FFA) level is frequently observed in obesity. FFA participates in the regulation of pituitary GH secretion. To determine whether the derangement of GH secretion in obesity is associated with high plasma FFA levels, tests with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and acipimox (ACX), an antilipolytic agent able to decrease FFA, were undertaken in six obese subjects and seven normal control subjects. In addition, the effect of prolonged suppression of FFA level on GH response to GHRH after administration of ACX for 1 month was also examined in each of the obese subjects. The GH response in obese subjects (median, 9.1 microg/L) to GHRH (1-29) (1 microg/kg intravenously [IV]) was significantly blunted as compared with normal control subjects (23.5 microg / L, P < .05). Basal FFA levels were higher in obese subjects (855.2 microEq / L than in normal control subjects (514.6 microEq / L, P < .05). One-dose ACX (500 mg) decreased FFA levels in both obese and normal subjects: the lowest FFA levels in obese subjects (158.3 microEq/L 2 to 2.5 hours after ACX were similar to those of normal control subjects (108.7 microEq/L). One-dose ACX potentiated GHRH-stimulated GH response in both obese and normal subjects. GH responses potentiated by ACX in obese subjects (27.1 microg/L) were similar to GH responses to GHRH in normal control subjects, but lower than in normal subjects treated with ACX plus GHRH (58.5 microg / L, P < .05). Thereafter, all of the obese subjects were treated with ACX for 1 month, after which the ACX plus GHRH tests were repeated. After 1 month of acipimox administration in the obese subjects, GH responses (38.8 microg/L) were significantly higher than those of obese subjects treated with GHRH and one-dose ACX plus GHRH (P < .05). They were similar to GH responses of normal control subjects receiving the one-dose ACX plus GHRH test. In conclusion, in obesity the prolonged suppression of FFA levels induced by long-term administration of ACX potentiated somatotrope responsiveness, likely acting at the pituitary level, suggesting that the duration of FFA suppression had an important relation to the magnitude of GH response.

Effects of acipimox, an antilipolytic drug, on the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone alone or combined with arginine in obesity

Increased free fatty acid (FFA) levels of obese patients are likely involved in the pathogenesis of the growth hormone (GH) hyposecretion of obesity. To clarify their role, we studied the influence of inhibition of plasma FFA levels, induced by 500 mg oral acipimox (ACX), an antilipolytic drug, on the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or combined with arginine ([ARG] study A) in six normal women ([NS] aged 24 to 37 years; body mass index, 22.4 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) and six obese women ([OB] aged 21 to 40 years; body mass index 39.5 +/- 3.2 kg/m2). In a group of seven OB patients (aged 18 to 58 years; body mass index, 35.8 +/- 1.3 kg/m2), the effect of ACX on either GHRH- or GHRH+ARG-stimulated GH increase was also studied after a 4-day treatment with the same drug at 250 mg three times daily (study B). OB patients had baseline FFA levels higher than NS (0.77 +/- 0.06 v 0.44 +/- 0.09 mmol/L, P<.05). In study A, ACX reduced FFA levels to the same nadir in both groups (0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.12 +/- 0.03 mmol/L, NS and OB subjects, respectively). In NS, ACX failed to significantly potentiate the GH response to either GHRH (1,371.9 +/- 425.2 v 1,001.8 +/- 229.0 micrograms/L x min) or GHRH+ARG (3558.4 +/- 1,513.7 v 3,045.9 +/- 441.8 micrograms/L x min), while in OB patients it increased the GH response to GHRH (797.6 +/- 277.3 v 353.8 +/- 136.7 micrograms/L x min, P<.01) and did not modify the response to ARG+GHRH (1,010.5 +/- 253.1 v 821.1 +/- 222.0 micrograms/L x min). In study B, ACX reduced FFA levels in OB patients (nadir, 0.09 +/- 0.04 mmol/L). This treatment strikingly increased the GH response to GHRH (1,734.0 +/- 725.4 v 271.5 +/- 112.8 micrograms/L x min, P<.01) and significantly potentiated that to ARG+GHRH (2,371.9 +/- 571.3 v 1,020.0 +/- 343.2 micrograms/L x min, P<.05). In conclusion, our present findings indicate that an acute reduction of plasma FFA levels in OB patients restores their somatotrope responsiveness, whereas it does not affect GH secretion in lean subjects. After prolonged treatment, ACX further improves GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in OB patients, suggesting that elevated FFA levels play a leading role in the GH hyposecretory state of obesity.

Influence of metabolic substrates and obesity on growth hormone secretion

In addition to stimulating body growth, GH plays an important role in metabolism. In turn, various products of intermediary metabolism, such as glucose, free fatty acids, dietary proteins, and amino acids feed back on both the hypothalamus and the anterior pituitary to control the function of the somatotroph cell. Alterations in nutritional status, such as malnutrition and obesity, markedly influence GH secretion and/or GH actions at tissue level. Therefore, the interaction between metabolic substrates and GH secretion can be viewed as part of the overall regulation of feeding and fasting in order to maintain an adequate body weight and body composition.

Metabolic modulation of the growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in man

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new potent synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man has never been evaluated. Hexarelin may act directly on specific pituitary receptors and indirectly on the hypothalamus. To elucidate its mechanism of action in man, we studied the interaction of hexarelin with glucose and free fatty acids (FFA), two metabolic factors known to inhibit both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulated GH secretion. Glucose is thought to inhibit GH secretion via stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release, whereas FFA could also act directly on somatotrope cells. Therefore, we investigated the effect of oral glucose (100 g) and lipid-heparin infusion (250 mL of a 10% lipid solution + 2,500 U heparin) on the GH response to a maximal dose (2 micrograms/kg intravenously [IV]) of hexarelin or GHRH in six normal men. Hexarelin elicited a clear-cut GH response (mean +/- SEM; peak, 62.6 +/- 8.0 micrograms/L) that was higher (P < .01) than that observed after GHRH (peak, 19.8 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L). Although similar increases in plasma glucose were observed with the two peptides, oral glucose almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 5.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 38.4 +/- 7.9 micrograms/L, P < .05). Similarly, lipid-heparin infusion nearly abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 4.9 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 34.2 +/- 4.5 micrograms/L, P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Interaction of free fatty acids and arginine on growth hormone secretion in man

We studied the interaction between free fatty acids (FFAs) and arginine (ARG) on basal and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in 14 normal subjects. Compared with placebo, ARG induced a significant increase of GH secretion (334.0 +/- 157.5 v 36.9 +/- 27.6 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). The increased levels of FFAs (1.9 +/- 0.4 mEq/L), obtained by the infusion of a lipid-heparin emulsion, abolished the effect of ARG (55.8 +/- 45.6 v 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). GHRH-induced GH secretion was potentiated by ARG (2,009.9 +/- 463.2 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .05) and suppressed by lipid-heparin infusion (106.2 +/- 28.3 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). Moreover, the lipid-heparin infusion inhibited the potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH increase (527.9 +/- 113.6 v 2,009.9 +/- 463.2 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). These results confirm the strong inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion, showing that they are even able to inhibit the potentiating effect of ARG on the GH response to GHRH. Since ARG likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, the inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion could take place directly at the pituitary level and/or at the hypothalamic level, counteracting the effect of ARG.

Protein intake during aggressive calorie restriction in obesity determines growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone after weight loss

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the influence of two types of calorie restriction, total fast or very low calorie diet, on GH responsiveness to GHRH in severely obese patients.

DESIGN

Twenty patients with massive obesity underwent one of two types of calorie restriction, total fast (10 patients) or very low calorie diet (10 patients).

MEASUREMENTS

Fasting GH, IGF-I, glucose, insulin and GH secretion after GHRH (100 ug i.v.) were assessed in all patients before and after diet therapy.

RESULTS

Both types of diet produced similar weight reduction (total fast, 5.6 +/- 1.6 kg/m2 vs very low calorie diet, 5.6 +/- 1.5 kg/m2 mean +/- SD). A significant increase in the integrated GH secretion was observed after weight loss with very low calorie diet (17 +/- 9 vs 27 +/- 12 mU/l min; P < 0.05). However, no change was found in GH response after weight loss with total fast (13 +/- 5 vs 15 +/- 7 mU/l min). Glucose, insulin and IGF-I levels showed a significant decrease with weight reduction which was similar for both groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the type of dietary manipulation during calorie restriction in obese patients may influence the changes in GH response to GHRH after weight loss.

Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion in humans

The episodic secretion of growth hormone (GH) depends on the rhythmic alternation in the hypothalamic release of GHRH and somatostatin (SS) into the hypophyseal portal system. In turn, GH appears to maintain this rhythm by stimulating SS and inhibiting GHRH secretion. Central adrenergic pathways, by modulating SS secretion, seem to be the final mediator for most stimuli, including other neurotransmitters, modifying GH release. Glucocorticoids enhance GH gene transcription and facilitate GH gene expression; the latter effect also depends on physiologic plasma levels of thyroid hormones. Sex steroids mainly act on SS neurons, most likely by affecting the alpha(2)-adrenergic transmission to them. Metabolic intermediates can also affect GH secretion: arginine and hypoglycemia inhibit SS release, whereas hyperglycemia and free fatty acids (FFA) stimulate it. In addition, a strong inhibitory effect of FFA on the somatotrophs also occurs.

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.